Professional Documents
Culture Documents
251
0 1991 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. 0014-2999/91/$03.50
ADONIS 001429999100246R
RJP 51789
A 55, a thiazolylami W
properties in the rat
The antiulcer activity of BAY P 14551 a thiazolylaminobenzimidazole derivative, was evaluated in different experimental ulcer
models and its antiulcer activity was compared to that of different reference drugs. ‘The overall activity of the compound was equal
to or more potent than that of reference antiulcer drugs, such as pirenzepine, cimetidine and carbenoxolone, but it was not as
potent as tioprostil. The EDso values (expressed as pmol/kg p.o.) were 68 (confidence limits: 51-91) for indomethacin-induced
ulcers, 21 (confidence limits: 13-31) for stress-induced ulcers and 1260 Pmol/kg p.o. (confidence limits: 412-3800) for ulcers
induced by absolute ethanol. The compound had no activity against cysteamine-induced duodenal ulcers and lost its cytoprotective
activity in adrenalectomised rats. Since inhibition of gastric acid secretion was seen, if at all, only with the higher doses, the
gastro-protective action of BAY P 1455 seemed not to be due to an antisecretory effect, but more likely to a gastroprotective action
as hypothesised for prostaglandins.
Antiulcer drugs; Ulcer models (experimental); Indomethacin; Stress; Cysteamine; Ethanol; F’rostaglandins; Gastric acid secretion
Correspondence to: A. Grassi. Department of Pharmacology, Bayer Fig. 1. Chemical structure of BAY P 1455 (2-(2’-benzimidazolyl)-
Italia, Via delle Groane 126, 20024 Garbagnate M.se (MI). Italy. amino-4.methyl-thiazol).
er and antisecretory drugs. including the .?.4. Stress-induced gustric ulcers
etidine. the sntimuscarinic pireuzepine.
K csrbenosolone. and the alcohol pros- Female Sprague-Dawley rats (200-220 g) were fasted
~~~~~~~~~di~~
E B analogue rioprostil. 18 h before the experiments. Ulcers were induced by
restraint and water immersion (Senay and Levine, 1967)
as follows. Test compounds were given 60 min before
the animals were placed in plastic cylinders with an
internal diameter of 4.5 cm and with walls perforated
with several holes of 0.7 cm diameter. The rats were
then immersed in cold water (18°C) up to the
manubrium for 2 h. Two hours after the stress, the
In-house-bred Sprague-Dawley rats of both sexes stomachs were removed, examined, and scored as de-
he animals were kept under standard con- scribed above.
ditions. received normal rodent chow (Dott. Piccioni,
Gestate, (MI) Italy) and had free access to water 2.5. Ethunol-induced gastric ulcers
throughout the experimental procedures.
Female Sprague-Dawley rats (180-210 g) were fasted
18 h before the experiments. Each rat was given 1 ml of
2.2. s1dm1nces
absolute ethanol orally to induce gastric lesions. Test
compounds were given orally 30 min before ethanol
B_4Y P 1455 (molecular weight 230.31) was synthe- administration. The animals were killed and the
sised by Dr. J. Ippen. cimetidine was obtained from stomachs removed after 1 h, opened along the greater
SigurtS (Italy). pirenzepine dihydrochloride and in- curvature. gently rinsed under tap water and examined.
domethacin were purchased from Prodotti Gianni The lesions looked like extended bloody streaks cover-
(Italy). carbenoxolone sodium from Searle. rioprostil ing about 60% of the corpus surface, as described by
from Ortho. omeprazole from Hassle. cysteamine-hy- Robert et al. (1979).
drochloride from BDH Italia, histamine-hydrochloride Stomachs without lesions or with only one puncti-
and carbamoylcholine-hydrochloride from Merck and form lesion were considered protected. The percentage
pentagastrin from ICI. of protected animals from each group was calculated.
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (150-200 g) were fasted 18 Female Sprague-Dawley rats (180-200 g) received
h before the experiments. Indomethacin was suspended normal animal chow throughout the experiments.
in 1% arabic gum and administered i.p. (15 mg/kg; Cysteamine was dissolved in saline and administered
according to Lee et al., 1971). Test compounds were S.C. at a dose of 425 mg/kg (Robert et al., 1974). Test
given orally at the same time. Stomachs were examined compounds were given orally at the same time. The
5 h after treatment as follows: the animals were killed duodenum was examined 24 h after cysteamine admin-
and the stomachs were removed, opened along the istration. A IO-cm segment of duodenum, starting from
smaller curvature, gently rinsed under tap water and the pylorus, was rernoved, opened longitodinally, gently
examined-The severity of gastric lesions was calculated rinsed under tap water and examined. Cysteamine ad-
by counting the number of lesions present in each ministration induced a single big ulcer in the duodenum.
stomach according to the following severity score: 0 = The severity of this ulceration was evaluated by using
normal stomach: 1 = punctiform redness: 2 = lesions of the following arbitrary score: 0 = normal duodenum;
less than 3 mm in any direction; 3 = lesions more than 1 = superficial erosions; 2 = deep ulcer and damage to
3 mm long in any direction. the muscularis mucosae; 3 = perforated ulcer or ulcer in
The ulcer index for each stomach was obtained by animals that died 5 h after cysteamine application. Data
summing the individual lesions of a given score class from animals that died within S h after cysteamine
and by multiplying the sum by the respective severity treatment were discarded.
score. Drug effects were evaluated by considering the
percent reduction in the ulcer index of treated animals 2.7. Studies with adrenalectomised rats
compared to that of untreated animals. Stomachs with
an ulcer index of less than 5 were considered protected, Female Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 180-210 g were
unless two ulcers larger than 1 mm or 1 ulcer larger adrenalectomised under ether anaesthesia as described
than 3 mm were observed. by Szabo et al. (1983). One week after adrenalectomy
253
the rats received a drinking solution of 0.9% NaCl for collected for 30 min under basal conditions, gastric
the duration of the experiment. secretion was stimulated by infusing different secreta-
Gastric lesions were induced in surgically treated gogues (1 ml/h for 2.5 h) throuf& the cannula inserted
animals and in control animals by ethanol treatment, as in the jugular vein. Sixty minutes after the infusion of
described above. The number and size of lesions were the stimulant. the compound or vehicle solution, ad-
similar in both groups. Gastric lesions were evaluated as justed to pH 5.1, was injected through the duodenal
described above. cannula. To evaluate changes in gastric acid secretion.
acid output in 15 min was measured before and after
2.8. Determination ofserum corticosterone ievels drug application and expressed as PEq H’.
2.10. Gastric acid secretion in perfused rat stomach 3. I. Indomethacin-induced gastric ulcers
Female rats were fasted 18 h before the experiments The mean ulcer index in the control group was
and anaesthetised with ethyl urethane (1 g/kg i.p.). between 37 and 43. BAY P 1455, tested from 20 to 220
After a median epigastric laparotomy and a median cut pmol/kg p.o., reduced the severity of indomethacin-in-
in the neck had been made, the oesophagus was cannu- duced lesions and showed a clear dose-response rela-
lated, using a cannula with an external diameter of 1.5 tionship (fig. 2). The threshold dose was 43 pmol/kg
mm, as described by Lai (1964). In experiments in p.o. The highest dose of BAY P 1455 (220 pmol/kg
which gastric acid secretion had to be stimulated by an po.) provided some rats with complete protection from
agonist, the jugular vein was also cannulated with can- ulcer formation.
nulas of 1 mm external diameter for the infusion of Cimetidine, which was used as the reference com-
secretagogues. A cannula (external diameter 2.5 mm) pound for H, blockers, and rioprostil, which was used
was introduced into the stomach through the pylorus, as the reference compound for prostaglandins, were also
by means of an incision in the duodenum. A second dose dependently active. The threshold dose of cimeti-
cannula (external diameter 1.5 mm) was introduced into dine was 40 pmol/kg p.o. One fifth of the animals that
the duodenal loop via the same duodenal incision for received the highest dose (396 pmol/kg p.o.) were com-
intraduodenal (i.d.) drug application. The stomach was pletely protected from ulcer formation. The tbreshold
cleaned by flushing 30 ml of physiological saline solu- dose of rioprostil was 0.14 pmol/kg p.o., and tbe num-
tion (37’C) through the oesophageal cannula. The ber of animals per group that were protected from ulcer
stomach was perfused with physiological saline at a rate formation was proportional to the dose used. The EDso
of 0.5 ml/min through the same cannula. After 30 min, values and respective confidence limits were 68 (51-91)
15-min samples of perfusate were collected via the pmol/kg for BAY P 1455, 96 (65-132) pmol/kg for
py!oric cannula for acid determination. Each sample cimetidine and 0.3 (0.2-0.4) pmol/kg for rioprostil.
was titrated to pH = 7 with 0.005 N NaOH with an Pirenzepine, which was used as the antimuscatinic refer-
automatic titrator (Radiometer). After samples had been ence drug, and ~arbenoxolone, used as the cytotrop~c
Mxroscopic score
20 -- ~-~
m----m Rioprostil
0-0 Bay P 1455
151
A-A Pirenzepine
I I
I
701
T
\
54 ---xl
‘\
r
a+ ___-(--- -,
0 ~~~~_~_~~~~_____~_~ I
‘C-1
1..
2 10 100 1000 lE-1 1 10 100 1000
Log doses (uMol,‘kg P.o.~ Log doses (uMol/kg p.o.)
Fig. 2. Dos+response curves for BAY P 1455 (20. 43, 87 and 220 Fig. 3. Dose-response curves for BAY P 1455 (4, 13, 49 and 130
pm&/kg p.0.). cimetidine (40. 119 and 3% pmol/kg p.0.) and pmol/kg p.0.). pirenzepine (7, 24, 71 and 236 pmol/kg p.o.) and
rioprostil(O.14. 0.3. 0.6. 1.1 and 2.3 pmol/kg p-0.) to prevent experi- rioprostil (0.6. 1.1. 2.3 and 3.4 pmol/kg p.o.) against stress-induced
mental gastric ulcer induced by indomethacin (15 mg/kg i.p.) in rats. gastric ulcers. Each point represents the meanfS.E.M. score values.
Twenty animals were used per dose on four different days. The data Twenty animals were used per dose in four different experiments. The
far the cimetidine group were pooled from two experiments per- mean ulcer index of the control rats was between 11 and 16.
formed at different times. Each point represents the mean f S.E.M. of
scores. The mean ulcer index of the control rats was between 37
and 43.
3.2. Stress-induced gastric ulcers
TABLE 2 TABLE 3
Mean scores f S.E.M. of gastric lesions and percent inhibition versus Mean scores* S.E.M. of gastric lesions of alI compounds test4
controls of cimetidine and carbenoxolone against stress-induced gastric against Wteamine-inducedduodenal ulcers.The EDso v&e could &
ulcers. calculated for pirenzepine only.
Compound N. of Dose Score % Compound N. Dose Score % ED,
rats (wnol/ (mean f inhibition of (pmol/ (mean* inhibition (conf.
kg P.o.) S.E.M.) rats kg p.o.) S.E.M.) lim)
Cimelidine 25 0 11.1 f1.5 Bay P 1455 25 0 3.2 +0.2
20 119 11.9k2.7 - 7.0 25 109 3.5 +0.2 - 10.1
20 400 5.5 *0.7 b 51.0 22 217 3.2 +0.3 -2.1
20 1189 6.4kO.9 b 42.4 18 434 2.8 +0.4 12.1
Carbenoxolone 25 0 11 868 2.8 +0.3 10.8
12.9k2.9
25 53 7.6kl.O a 41.0 Cimetidine 20 0 3.0 +I0.2
24 175 9.4* 1.3 27.2 16 198 3.5 + 0.4 - 16.7
25 526 lO.O& i.8 22.0 14 396 2.7 f 0.5 9.5
a P < 0.05 and h P < 0.01 are significandy different from control val- 12 793 2.9kO.4 2.8
ues. 13 1585 2.6 +0.3 12.8
The protective action of BAY P 1455 was less pro- Rioprostil 22 0 2.7kO.3
19 1.1 1.8kO.3 = 34.4
nounced in this ulcer model. The compound exhibited a
18 2.3 1.4kO.3 b 47.0
rather flat dose-response relationship in the range from 19 3.4 1.6kO.3 b 42.1
130 to 4340 pmol/kg p.o. (fig. 5). The EDS,, calculated 21 6.8 0.7kO.2 b 74.0
according to the Litchfield and Wilcoxon’s method a P -=z0.05 and b P -Z0.01 are significantly different from control val-
(1949), was 1260 (confidence limits: 412-3800) pmol/kg. ues.
In contrast, the reference compounds pirenzepine,
carbenoxolone and rioprostil exhibited a clear dose-re-
sponse relationship. Cimetidine was not active in this
experimental model in doses up to 3960 pmol/kg p.o_ ble activity in this ulcer model (table 3). Only pirenze-
The respective EDso values (confidence limits) of pine (from 60 to 470 pmol/kg p.o.) exhibited a dose-de-
pirenzepine, carbenoxolone and rioprostil were 990 pendent protective action, with an EDso of 100 (confi-
(674-1450), 482 (319-725) and 0.51 (0.28-0.90) pmol/kg dence limits: 67-136) pmol/kg, while good protection,
p.o. The potency of BAY P 1455 was similar to that of but not completely dose-related, was observed with
carbenoxolone and pirenzepine but less pronounced rioprostil (table 3).
than that of rioprostil.
3.5. Antiulcer activity in adrenalectomised rats
3.4. Cysteamine-induced duodenal ulcers
Since corticosteroids exert a permissive role on the
Like cimetidine and carbenoxolone, BAY P 1455 cytoprotective effect of prostaglandins, as described by
(from 109 to 868 pmol/kg p.o.) did not show apprecia- Szabo et al. (1983), the protective action of BAY P 1455
TABLE 4
Mean blood corlicosterone levels (pg/ml) f S.E.M. after administration of lest compounds lo normal (NOR) and adrenslectomised (ADR) rats.
.
.^,.-.
i I ._
?E-’ t
10 ‘00 1000
[; ;;c<s ..‘.‘,: ,,_: ? : Log doses (uLlol,‘kg p.0.)
Fig. 5. Ckw-re~~~nsr tune< for B.AY P 1455 (130. 434. 1300 and Fig. 7. Dose-response curves for BAY P 1455 (130. 434 and 1300
4340 amoI;kg p.0.). pirenzepine (154. 707 and 1410 gmol/kg p.0.). pmol/kg). cimetidinc (39. 119. 396 and 1189 pmol/kg), pirenzepine
csrbenoxokme (175. 330. 526 and 1750 pmol/kg p.0.) and rioprostt! (0.71. 2.4. 7.1 and 23.6 pmol/kg) and rioprostil (0.3. 3 and 30
(0.W. 0.08. 0.3 and 08 pmol.,‘kg po.) against ethano!-induced gastric pmol/kg) administered orally to pylorus-ligated rats. The data repre-
ukxrs. Twenty animals per group \\ere used in four experiments. srnt the mean+S.E.M. FEq of H ’ secreted in 4 h under basal
conditions.
Cimetidine 46 0 26.8k1.8
20 12 23.2 + 2.6 13.4
20 40 20.6? 2.2 a 22.9
19 119 17.4k2.1 h 34.9
20 400 13.9k1.8 h 48.1
Omeprazole 8 0 21.9*3.4
9 3 20.8 + 2.8 4.8
8 9 12.4k1.3 a 43.6
9 30 9.3*0.5 h 57.6
Rioprostil 8 0 27.4k4.2
Fig. 6. Gastroprotective activity (percentage of protected stomachs) of 8 0.04 28.3 +4.1 -3.5
BAY P 1455 (1300 pmol/kg p.o.). pirenzepine (707 amol/kg p.0.). 8 0.14 16.3k4.4 40.4
carbenoxolone (526 pmol/kg p.0.) and rioprostil (0.8 pmol/kg p.0.) 8 0.56 12.2+1.6 h 55.3
against gastric u!cers induced by absolute ethanol in normal and a P < 0.05 and h P < 0.01 are significantly different from control val-
adrenalectomised rats. Eight rats were used for each group. ues.
257
3.6. Gastric acid secretion in pylorus-ligated rats secretion in rats this effect was not dose-dependent
(table 5). Pirenzepine, when tested from 70 to 700
BAY P 1455 tested at 130, 434 and 1300 pmol/kg qWkg id., had the same effect.
p.o. dose dependently reduced the total gastric acid As expected. gastric secretion was reduced in a dose-
output in this classical experimental model (fig. 7). The dependent manner by all three reference compounds.
EDSUwas 970 (confidence limits: 618-2290) pmol/kg. Cimetidine was tested i.d. from 12 to 400 pmol/kg_
The volume of gastric juice secreted was not reduced in omeprazole from 3 to 30 pmol/kg. and rioprostil from
a 4-h period. 0.04 to 0.56 pmol/kg.
The other compounds used as reference were also
active in a dose-dependent manner, not only by reduc- 3.7.2. Stimulated gastric acid secretion
ing the total acid output but also by reducing the The thiazolylaminobenzimidazole derivative BAY P
volume of gastric juice secreted. Omeprazole was the 1455, tested at 220 and 868 pmol/kg i.d.. did not show
most active compound, with an ED,, of 3 pmol/kg p.o. appreciable activity in reducing gastric acid secretion
(confidence limits: 0.9-lo), while the EDso values of stimulated by histamine (table 6). In contrast. cimeti-
pirenzepine and cimetidine were 5.4 (confidence limits: dine, rioprostil and omeprazole reduced the stimulated
2.3-12.9) and 179 (confidence limits: 102-295) pmol/kg gastric acid secretion in a dose-dependent manner. The
p.0.. respectively. dose-response curves for cimetidine and omeprazole
were steeper than the dose-response curve for rioprostil.
3.7. Gastric acid secretion in perfused rat stomachs Pirenzepine was completely inactive in this experimen-
tal model when tested in doses up to 2400 Pmol/kg i.d.
The effect of BAY P 1455 on basal and stimulated
BAY P 1455 also did not influence gastric acid secretion
gastric acid secretion in the perfused rat stomach model
stimulated by pentagastrin and carbamoylcholine.
was compared with rhat of cimetidine. pirenzepine,
rioprostil and omeprazole. Gastric acid secretion was
stimulated with either histamine. pentagastrin, or
4. Discussion
carbamoylcholine.
3.7.1. Basal gastric acid secretion The aim of the study was to verify the antiulcer
BAY P 1455 tested at 868 and 1300 pmol/kg i.d. activity of BAY P 1455. as demonstrated in primary
reduced slightly, but significantly, basal gastric acid screening p:sts, and to clarify its mode of action.
The benzimidazole derivative, BAY P 1455. had clear
TABLE 6
antiulcer effects in all the experimental models tested,
with the exception of the cysteamine duodenal ulcer
Effect of the antiulcer drugs tested on the mean+S.E.M. total acid
output (TAO) in the in situ perfused stomach model after histamine model. Thus, the compound had gastroprotective prop-
stimulation (6 mg/kg per min i.v.). erties, since duodenal ulcers induced by cysteamine are
mainly the consequence of gastric hypersecretion (Szako
Compound N. OC Dose TAO (FEq H+ ) %
rats (pmol/ (mean + S.E.M.) inhibition et al., 1979; Kirkegaard et al., 1980; Boesby et al..
kg P.o.) 1983). The protective activity of BAY P 1455 was
BAY P 1455 16 0 219k22
clear-cut and dose-dependent in the gastric ulcer models
8 220 166+39 24.2 where the ulcerogenic agents produced ulcers not only
8 868 176&29 19.5 by causing hypersecretion. but also by reducing defen-
Cimetidine 22 0 304 f 31
sive mechanisms. Overall, the compound proved to be a
8 4 226 f 43 25.7 better gastroprotective agent than the reference com-
8 12 208+18 31.6 pounds used, with the exception of the prostaglandin
8 40 217+28 a 28.6 analogue rioprostil.
x 120 131+15h 56.9
As shown in table 7, BAY P 1455 was more active in
Omeprazole 0 176 f 26 the stress-induced ulcer model than in the other experi-
3 148&18 15.7 mental models (EDso values around 20 pmol/kg P.0.).
9 53k 6h 69.9
However, its protective activity against indomethacin-
30 26k 4h 85.2
90 23+ 6h 87.2
induced ulcers was also noteworky (ED,, of 68 pmol/kg
p.0.). In the stress-induced ulcer model, BAY P I455
Rioprostil 8 0 177123 was at least as active as the antimuscarinic drug
8 0.14 137511 22.8
0.28 128f15 27.8
pirenzepine (fig. 3), while the H, blocker cimetidine and
8
8 0.56 124k 16 30.0 the cytotrophic compound carbenoxolone were com-
8 1.13 109*15 ‘I 98.5 pletely inactive. This might indicate that histamine-in-
a P < 0.05 and h P < 0.01 are significantly different from control G
duced gastric secretion does not play an important role
ues. in this ulcer model.
Aknowledgements
, t&tea wtth thetr conhdcnce hmit?s of the antiulcer drugs tested
tn dtffe,mnt e\pertmetnaf rat models of ulcers. nd. = EDS,, not dcfina- The authors wish to express their gratitude to G. Boldorini and R.
blc. Paglia for their excellent technical assistance.