Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Perception Psychological Effects and Cessation of e Cigarettes Among College Students
Perception Psychological Effects and Cessation of e Cigarettes Among College Students
____________
A Thesis
Presented
To the Faculty of
____________
In Partial Fulfillment
Master of Arts
In
Clinical Psychology
____________
by
Michelle Kang
Spring 2019
I dedicate this to my mother and father, who are my motivation to be successful in life.
Without them I would not be here. Thank you for all the love and support you have given
me since day one. My mother Sook Kang and father Sei Chong Kang.
ii
ACKNOWLEDEGMENTS
I would like to thank my thesis chair and mentor, Dr. Carl Sneed and my committee, Dr.
Keisha Paxton and Dr. Philip Vieira. Their participation and input greatly improved my
thesis.
Thank you to my colleagues, Bryant Portillo, Christopher Odudu, Logan Baughman, and
Andrew Soto from Dr. Carl Sneed’s research lab who greatly assisted in this research.
Further, I would like to acknowledge CSUDH PEGS: Graduate Writing Institute for
Lastly, I would like to show my gratitude to the faculty from the Psychology Department
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
DEDICATION .................................................................................................................... ii
CHAPTER
1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1
Background ................................................................................................................ 2
Problem Statement ..................................................................................................... 8
Purpose of the Study................................................................................................... 8
Research Questions and Hypotheses .......................................................................... 9
Definition of Terms .................................................................................................. 10
Introduction ............................................................................................................. 11
E-Cigarettes and the Perception of Safety .............................................................. 12
Conventional Cigarette Users’ Perceptions on E-Cigarettes .................................. 15
Non-Smokers Unfavorable Opinions of E-Cigarettes ............................................ 18
Opinions of Friends and Family ............................................................................. 21
Stress and the Use of E-Cigarettes and Conventional Cigarettes ........................... 24
Self-Esteem and the Use of E-Cigarettes and Conventional Cigarettes ................. 27
Cessation to Vape or Smoking ................................................................................ 29
iv
CHAPTER PAGE
3. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................33
Participants .............................................................................................................33
Measures ................................................................................................................34
Data Analysis Procedure ........................................................................................35
4. RESULTS ......................................................................................................................39
5. DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................48
Perceptions of E-Cigarettes....................................................................................49
Psychological Conditions Due to Conventional Cigarettes and E-Cigarettes .......53
The Difficulties of Quitting Conventional Cigarettes versus E-Cigarettes ...........57
Limitations .............................................................................................................60
Significance of the Study to the Field of Clinical Psychology ..............................61
Recommendations ..................................................................................................62
Recommendations for Future Research .................................................................63
Summary ................................................................................................................63
REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................65
APPENDIX: SURVEY......................................................................................................79
v
LIST OF TABLES
PAGE
vi
ABSTRACT
E-cigarettes have evolved since 1965 with research indicating users believing that
e-cigarettes are less harmful than their conventional counterparts. For this study, I
cigarettes, in relation to stress and self-esteem associated with use, the likelihood to
cigarette users and non-users in their perception of e-cigarette use. Further, there was a
relationship between stress or low self-esteem and usage groups in the findings. Last, it
was found from Pearson Correlation that e-cigarette users found it more difficult to quit
using e-cigarettes compared to conventional cigarette smokers who are able to quit
smoking cigarettes.
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
The use of tobacco dates back to the early 1500 BC when the Mayans burnt
tobacco leaves in religious ceremonies. During these religious ceremonies, the plant was
blessed with powers of healing (Doll, 1998; Musgrave & Musgrave, 2000). Christopher
Columbus discovered tobacco and brought it to Europe in 1482 (Brandt, 2007; Musgrave
& Musgrave, 2000), while Jean Nicot, King of France’s Consult, shipped the tobacco
plant for further research from Portugal to Paris in 1560. After this discovery, the
alehouses, using smoking as a social tool. Tobacco had an enormous demand on growth
and sale, as most Europeans smoked tobacco as it began shaping the character of their
personalities (Brandt, 2007). By the late 16th century, the use of the plant started to
evolve in different parts of the world (Musgrave & Musgrave, 2000). It wasn’t until the
18th century that cigarette consumption increased where both men and women smoked
and doctors offered cigarettes to patients as a tool for relaxation (Doll, 1998).
As tobacco continued to evolve and the act of smoking itself was utilized as a
social tool, the adverse health effects had not yet been clearly defined. Although lung
cancer was medically recognized during the 18th century, it was not yet linked to
smoking tobacco (Proctor, 2012). In 1898, Hermann Rottmann, a medical student from
Germany, researched German tobacco workers who had been diagnosed with lung tumors
(Proctor, 2012). In 1912, physician Robert Adler noted that the incidence of abuse
2
towards tobacco and alcohol could be malignant neoplasms of the lung yet highlighted
that this statement was not his final judgment (Proctor, 2012). Although Rottman
proposed that lung tumors could be a result of tobacco dust, Adler corrected him stating
Additional research on lung cancer in relation to tobacco use has increased since
Robert Adler and Hermann Rottman first linked tobacco use to lung cancer. Tobacco use
is the leading cause of preventable casualties; nearly one in five deaths occurs as a result
of cigarette smoking (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2017), and life-
long cigarette smokers have a greater chance of developing health conditions such as
pulmonary disease, all leading to death (World Health Organization [WHO], 2012).
The history of cigarettes and smoking extends several centuries, starting with the
tobacco companies took advantage of extending tobacco use nationwide, which gave rise
Background
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is an agency that protects consumers and
promotes competition, while monitoring the tobacco industry for the consumers’ health
and safety concerns (FTC, 2018). The FTC reported that tobacco companies spending on
cigarette advertising and promotion increased from $8.3 billion in 2015 to that of $8.71
billion in 2016 (FTC, 2018). Tobacco companies advertise in order to maximize their
brand’s popularity, while also increasing awareness of their product. There are ways that
3
the tobacco industry advertises smoking so that their company can succeed. For example,
Furthermore, adolescents may witness their peers smoking and begin to view this as
acceptable or normal behavior amongst their social milieus. High school athletes often
watch professional athletes chew tobacco and end up partaking in similar behaviors.
Parental units can also influence their children to smoke, as children observe their parents
smoking and may fall victim to second-hand smoke. There are many different strategies
that tobacco companies use in advertising in order to gain popularity of tobacco and
associated with smoking as an adult (Shang, Huang, Cheng, Li, & Chaloupka, 2016;
Watkins, Glantz, & Chaffee, 2018). Youth who use tobacco products are also placed at a
higher risk for addiction and are more likely to continue using tobacco products
throughout adulthood (CDC, 2017). The CDC has identified biological and genetic
factors as to why youth may begin smoking at young ages. For example, if a mother was
smoking during pregnancy, it is likely that her child will smoke in later life. The CDC has
also highlighted that youth may be more biologically sensitive to nicotine, causing them
parents were smokers, the child may grow up to smoke and will experience a higher level
more than 3,200 individuals under the age of 18 smoke their first cigarette (U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services [USDHHS], 2014). As a result, the tobacco
industry has successfully fulfilled their goals to expose youth to their product and
Smoking Cessation
Fortunately, there are many people who want to quit smoking cigarettes and
tobacco control policies have assisted in decreasing the number of smokers by creating
smoking laws for smoke-free areas. Thus, smokers have fewer opportunities to smoke. In
addition to mass media highlighting harmful effects of tobacco use, the creation of quit
lines and other smoking cessation programs, have emerged, including the increase of
taxes on tobacco (Levy et al., 2010). These strategies appeared to be working, as 6 out of
10 adult cigarette smokers in the United States had reported that they wanted to
completely quit smoking in 2015 (CDC, 2017). There are many resources available that
can help people quit; treatments, medications, telephone hotlines, and online counseling.
People who desire to quit may attempt evidence-based methods of quitting, such as
behavioral support or medication. Such methods may also include the use of Nicotine
Replacement Therapy. These evidence-based methods are more likely to yield successful
results, as some smokers may either quit gradually or stop abruptly (Usher,
Raiamanoharan, & West, 2014). Furthermore, studies found the relationship between
family support and smoking cessation was found to be effective in stop smoking (Scholz
5
et al., 2016). Indeed, society is finding ways to steer people away from smoking tobacco,
which challenges tobacco companies to create new ways to lure their customers back.
Although many people have quit or attempted to quit smoking cigarettes, tobacco
maintain their addiction. To illustrate, tobacco companies have created new products that
deliver nicotine into a device called an electronic cigarette, or e-cigarette (Marcham &
Springston, 2017) Tobacco companies knew that since e-cigarettes are offered in a
variety of flavors and contemporary designs, it was bound to interest their consumers
E-Cigarettes
In lieu of the many methods of quitting tobacco, traditional smokers have also
switched to e-cigarettes. Smokers who try this device feel that e-cigarettes are a cessation
aid, while acting as a social enhancement and improving one’s health (Pokhrel, Herzog,
Muranaka, & Fagan, 2015). Studies have found that smokers find e-cigarettes as a new
pleasure, especially due to the different flavors that are offered (Measham, O’Brien, &
smokeless non-tobacco cigarette (Marcham & Springston, 2017). These devices consist
mechanism using a battery powered device. The strength of nicotine in e-cigarettes range
6
from 0% to 2.0%, equaling 20mg/mL, whereas a traditional cigarette contains one
milligram per cigarette (Benowitz, 2001; Cox et al., 2016). Thus, finishing one cartridge
one e-cigarette cartridge can deliver over 200 inhales, equal to one packet of traditional
cigarettes.
E-cigarettes have evolved since the original schematic was first patented. The
devices are now offered in different sizes, designs, and potency of fluid tobacco. The
depicted a white body with a tan mouthpiece (USDHHS, 2016). Second generation e-
cigarettes were larger than a traditional cigarette, and depicted the shape of a pen,
tank-style e-cigarette, which appeared bulkier than its former counterparts. This e-
cigarette allowed for different levels of heat intensity and was also rechargeable.
A study completed in 2012 discovered that there were more than 460 brands and
7,700 flavors of e-cigarettes (Zhu et al., 2014). Today, tobacco-like fluids come in a
variety of flavors such as strawberry, cherry, and chocolate, making the products more
such as e-hookahs, mods, vape pens, vape, and tank systems (CDC, 2017). Vapor is
defined as the nicotine aerosol that is generated from the device, where people typically
shorten the term vapor into vape, the action of smoking an e-cigarette (Czogala et al.,
cigarettes contain addictive nicotine and other chemicals that are harmful to one’s health.
The tobacco industry spent $6.4 million in 2011, increasing to $115 million by
2014 to advertise their products (CDC, 2017). E-cigarette companies were aware that the
media influenced youth population and were likely to fall back on heavy marketing
campaigns as they did with traditional cigarettes in the late 1920s (Cook, 2014). In fact,
e-cigarettes have become increasingly popular among youth and young adults by
cigarette products are a safer alternative than traditional cigarettes. Smokers are choosing
bypassing the negative effects of traditional smoking. However, this is not the case, as
Since e-cigarettes were introduced, the CDC found an increase in the use among
youth and young adults from 2011 to 2015 (CDC, 2013; CDC, 2014). For instance, the
prevalence of e-cigarette users amongst high school students was 5% in 2011, rising to
cigarettes to the younger generation. Although government agencies inform the public
effects on the brain from nicotine exposure, and psychosocial health, many users don’t
College students arrive on campus with a host of pressures and stressors that they
are experiencing. Studies have highlighted how college students do smoke for reasons
outside of social realms, such as relaxation, stress relief, and emotional regulation
(Delene & Brogowicz, 1990; Rosa, Aloise-Young, & Henry, 2014). The need to fit into a
new academic environment combined with a variety of social exposures encourages some
students to utilize smoking as a coping skill such as the use of conventional cigarettes and
e-cigarettes. Conventional cigarettes are generally considered more harmful than their
use (Chen, Bullen, & Dirks, 2017). Modern usage of conventional cigarettes and e-
cigarettes is associated with coping skills and certain psychological stressors. One study
demonstrated that smokers score lower on a general scale measuring well-being (Barros,
Kozasa, Formagini, Pereira, & Ronzani, 2015). Positive expectancies about e-cigarettes
were associated with quitting smoking, while negative expectancies were linked with
smokers who utilized both conventional cigarettes and e-cigarettes (Harrell et al., 2015).
The purpose of this research was to investigate the perceptions of e-cigarettes and
conventional cigarettes amongst college students. This research also investigated the use
likelihood to use these products. A secondary purpose to this study was to determine the
Perceptions
H1D: Individuals who have family and friends who smoke conventional cigarettes
or e-cigarettes will have a less favorable opinion with e-cigarette use around them than
non-smokers who do not have friends and family who use conventional or electronic
cigarettes.
Psychological Effects
H2A: Individuals who experience high stress are more likely to use e-cigarettes or
conventional cigarettes.
H2B: Students with low self-esteem are more likely to use e-cigarettes or
conventional cigarettes.
Cessation to E-Cigarettes or
Conventional Cigarettes
cigarettes.
10
Definition of Terms
Electronic Cigarettes: Electronic cigarettes are devices that have a fluid-filled reservoir
Conventional Cigarettes: A thin cylinder of finely cut tobacco rolled in paper for smoking
Introduction
Tobacco companies have always explored new ideas and sought products that
seemed safer than regular conventional cigarettes (Trumbo & Harper, 2013). As new
products are being introduced to the market, cigarette smokers are convinced that e-
cigarettes are a safer alternative since they do not contain tobacco. E-cigarettes work by
automatically heating the liquid nicotine and other chemical compounds such as nicotine,
carbonyl compounds, and volatile organic compounds (USDHHS, 2016) via an electronic
element, then steam from the liquid nicotine and other chemicals are released which are
then inhaled and absorbed orally (Trumbo & Harper, 2013; USDHHS, 2016).
Consequently, e-cigarettes have numerous health effects to individuals who use this
device, especially among youth, young adults, and pregnant women (USDHHS, 2016).
Questions arose when e-cigarettes were introduced to the general public because many
consumers were not getting the truth about e-cigarettes from tobacco companies. Cooper,
Louisa, Harrell, and Perry (2017) completed a study that focused on e-cigarettes, where
dual users of conventional cigarettes and e-cigarettes were asked about their perception of
cigarettes. Both groups reported that they believed e-cigarettes posed lower to no harm on
their health while also believing that it was safer than smoking conventional cigarettes.
Cigarette smokers who experience undesirable consequences from smoking are more
12
likely to use e-cigarettes for smoking cessation (Pokhrel & Herzong, 2015). The Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved e-cigarettes as a method of smoking
cessation and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has stated that there has not been
enough evidence where e-cigarettes are recommended for smoking cessation in adults
(CDC, 2018). If the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, who is a group of health
experts that makes recommendations about preventive health care, has not found enough
evidence that e-cigarettes are a safer alternative, consumers must learn to understand the
safety of e-cigarette use. Recent studies have also investigated the perception of e-
cigarettes from e-cigarette users to determine if they are aware of the health risks
undergraduate students who were specifically e-cigarette users and non-users (Case,
Crook, Lazard, & Mackert, 2016). Thirty undergraduate students were recruited for the
study and completed semi-structured interviews. The participants of this qualitative study
were non-users and were more dubious about e-cigarettes than e-cigarette smokers. E-
cigarette smokers appeared to have positive attitudes towards e-cigarette use compared to
that of their non-using counterparts. E-cigarette users also appeared to believe that the e-
cigarettes were healthier and less harmful than conventional cigarettes. When e-cigarette
users were asked why they believed it was healthier and less harmful, several themes
emerged, including that e-cigarettes contained fewer chemicals, less nicotine, and less
13
smoke than conventional cigarettes. For example, e-cigarette users believed that there
was less smoke entering the lungs, while also perceiving that other individuals around
them were not at risk of secondhand smoke since the devices release a vapor instead of
smoke. Vapor is defined as the nicotine aerosol that is generated from the device and
inhaled by the e-cigarette smoker (Czogala et al, 2014). E-cigarette vapor contains
nicotine and other chemicals including solvents, flavorants, and toxicants that both the
smoker and people within the vicinity are exposed to (Marcham & Springston, 2017;
(USDHHS, 2016). Depending on the brand, the potency of nicotine contained in the e-
cigarette depends on whether the device is smoke indoors or outdoors. Nonusers within
the vicinity of e-cigarettes are involuntarily exposed to nicotine, albeit not toxic tobacco-
specific combustion products (Czogala et al, 2014). Therefore, it is partially true when
people believe e-cigarettes are safer than their conventional counterparts, due to e-
cigarettes not releasing toxic tobacco smoke similarly to conventional cigarettes. Lastly,
in the same study, another e-cigarette user claimed that electronic cigarettes have flavors
and lower amounts of nicotine, which appeared to increase perceptions of higher levels of
concentrated on the impact that flavors from e-cigarettes have on this misconception.
Flavors in e-cigarettes can be a way to distract the smoker from tasting tobacco.
Olfactory and gustatory senses in smokers can highlight pleasurable perceptions from the
amongst adults were studied (Xu, Guo, Liu, Lie, & Wang, 2016). This meta-analysis
found that the majority of individuals had the perception that e-cigarettes were safer than
current smokers demonstrated a higher interest to try e-cigarettes than former smokers
and non-smokers. Xu et al’s (2016) study purported that the lowest prevalence of
evident that people perceived e-cigarettes to be safer than conventional cigarettes in this
study.
E-cigarette users view vaping as a safer alternative than non-users do for many
reasons. Smokers may not have been educated on e-cigarettes not being safe nor being
any healthier. Individuals who are exposed to tobacco advertisements are particularly at-
risk for attempting first time e-cigarette use without knowing the health effects (Nicksic,
Snell, Rudy, Cobb & Barnes, 2017). Tobacco advertisements are glamorized to attract
more consumers. All negative health facts on e-cigarettes are not displayed in smokeless
tobacco advertising. Furthermore, young adults are more receptive to marketing and are
more likely to have positive perceptions on e-cigarettes that they are less harmful
(Pokhrel, Fagan, Kehl & Herzog, 2015). Therefore, tobacco companies are succeeding in
marketing e-cigarettes to the public without disclosing negative health effects. Thus,
15
without being properly educated on e-cigarettes, users are not aware of the potentially
dangerous health effects. Since these studies include statistics of individuals’ perceptions
Since smoking tobacco is the leading cause of preventable death in the United
States (CDC, 2018), many adult cigarette smokers want to quit smoking. The National
non-institutionalized United States civilian population, reported that between the years of
2000 and 2015, there had been an increase of cessation attempts (from 49.2% to 55.4%),
recent smoking cessation (5.7% to 7.4%), receipt of health professional advice to quit
smoking (52.4% to 57.2%), and the use of cessation counseling tools and/or medication
(21.9% to 31.2%). Moreover, the survey concluded that approximately three in five
adults who had ever smoked had successfully quit (Babb, Malarcher, Schauer, Asman, &
Jamal, 2017). There are several resources available to aid smokers in the cessation of
cigarettes; however, given that e-cigarettes may look more alluring and pleasant, some
cigarettes (Pokhrel & Herzog, 2015). Cigarette smokers are more likely to smoke e-
(Choi & Forster, 2013). The FDA and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force have not
approved e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation aid (CDC, 2018). A recent study concluded
16
that conventional cigarette smokers do believe that e-cigarettes could help them reduce or
quit conventional cigarettes. In addition, the same group of participants who were
exposed to tobacco product advertising, while receiving coupons for tobacco products,
was more likely to try e-cigarettes for the first time (Nicksic, Snell, Rudy, Cobb &
that e-cigarettes aid in the reduction or cessation of smoking tobacco cigarettes; therefore,
their perceptions of e-cigarettes are not as negatively correlated compared to the truth of
e-cigarettes.
participants were current smokers who had smoked 100 or more cigarettes in their
lifetime. The results of the survey demonstrated that current and former cigarette smokers
that e-cigarettes aid in the cessation of conventional cigarettes, while being less harmful.
In this study, Volesky et al. (2016) concluded that cigarette users who perceived e-
cigarettes as being harmless were more likely to use e-cigarettes around other individuals.
This finding highlighted that since cigarette users perceived e-cigarettes to be safer, they
appeared comfortable enough to use e-cigarettes around others without knowing that
vapor is considered secondhand smoke and can affect others around them negatively.
Data from cigarette smokers was collected from a cohort study completed by Choi
and Forster (2013). This study revealed that participants who were current or former
by Choi and Forster (2013) to suggest that cigarette smokers had higher odds of knowing
bridging product where they only used e-cigarettes in places where conventional
cigarettes were not allowed. These studies demonstrated that cigarette smokers perceive
e-cigarettes as harmless since they are comfortable in using the device in public places
study where they assessed cigarette smokers’ perceptions on attempts to cease smoking
study perceived e-cigarettes as cessation aids and felt that e-cigarettes were just as
effective as FDA-approved cessation tools. Findings in this study indicated that cigarette
smokers who used e-cigarettes to quit conventional smoking habits reported to have
through the use of e-cigarettes as less harmful than conventional cigarettes in many ways.
conventional cigarettes when they smoke the device in public places where tobacco
cigarettes are otherwise prohibited. In addition, e-cigarettes users had the misconception
that electronic cigarettes were effective cessation tools, even though the FDA and the
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force had not confirmed that e-cigarettes are an effective
18
and safe alternative to conventional smoking cessation tools. In some cases, e-cigarettes
had a positive impact on the psychological effects on traditional cigarette smokers where
they felt highly motivated to quit smoking cigarettes. These studies highlighted how
conventional cigarette smokers and e-cigarette users shared similar opinions in which
Some smokers believe that e-cigarettes are safer than conventional cigarettes due to the
device releasing vapor versus smoke (Case et al., 2016). In actuality, the aerosol in e-
cigarettes contains nicotine and heavy metals that people within the vicinity are exposed
to through second hand smoke (USDHHS, 2016; Marcham & Springston, 2017).
Whether it is vapor or smoke, non-smokers may view it as harmful; therefore, they have a
less favorable opinion about e-cigarettes when being used around them.
attitudes toward e-cigarette use in indoor workplaces and selected public and private
venues. The study took place in Barcelona, Spain with 736 participants who were adults
currently living in the city. Results concluded that 45% disagreed with the use of e-
cigarettes in any indoor public places. Of that 45%, 52.3% were non-conventional
cigarette smokers, former cigarette smokers, never having used e-cigarettes. Non-
cigarettes in schools, hospitals, health care centers, and hospitality venues. The lowest
19
percentage of disagreement for using e-cigarettes was found in private venues such as
homes and private vehicles. In contrast, the study found that the least disagreement for
the use of e-cigarettes in public and private places were among cigarette smokers and e-
cigarette users. The largest disagreement for e-cigarette use in public places was from
about their perceptions of e-cigarette use in public; they reported having negative or
neutral attitudes toward e-cigarettes. One participant stated that she did not have a
positive opinion on the topic but felt that any type of smoking should be prohibited on
campus. Another participant, who was also a non-user of e-cigarettes, stated that she did
not feel that e-cigarette smoking should be allowed on campus. This participant was
aware that e-cigarettes contained chemicals that were harmful to the smoker and
individuals around them; however, she completed her statement by highlighting that there
are people on campus who are fit and active, and it is not healthy for individuals to be
using e-cigarettes around the campus population. Both participants in this study appeared
campus. They both appeared concerned about e-cigarette vapors and the impact it had on
practitioners and tobacco counselors at a facility was conducted to explore their attitudes
and risk perceptions concerning e-cigarettes (Van Gucht & Baeyens, 2016). The
20
participants had an average of more than 17 years of experience in the field, with
approximately 1% of the sample being cigarette smokers. This study demonstrated that
two-thirds of the sample agreed that e-cigarettes were harmful to individuals within the
vicinity of the vapor. Approximately 8 out of 10 respondents disagreed with allowing the
general practitioners and tobacco counselors were also aware of the health effects that e-
cigarettes pose, including the risk of cancer and how e-cigarettes are considered
health risks of smokers. They discussed that e-cigarettes would cause renormalization of
smoking habits and may also be viewed as an alternative to conventional cigarettes. The
participants expressed that renormalization of e-cigarettes may lead the electronic devices
cigarette users. Studies have found that non-smokers disagreed with e-cigarette use in
public places (Martínez-Sánchez et al., 2014). Moreover, when a non-smoker was asked
of her perception of e-cigarette use on campus, she responded by saying that she
preferred e-cigarettes to be prohibited on campus since the exposure of vapor can affect
individuals within the vicinity via second-hand smoke. Non-smokers were aware that the
aerosol of the e-cigarettes contained harmful chemicals within secondhand smoke. Due to
these perceptions, general practitioners and tobacco counselors at a health facility were
interviewed to confirm the dangers of vapor. More than half of the participants agreed
that e-cigarettes should be banned from public places (Van Gucht & Baeyens, 2016). In
21
addition, they were aware that e-cigarettes contained harsh chemicals such as carcinogens
that lead to cancer. Overall, when health professionals agreed that e-cigarettes should be
prohibited due to second hand smoke, it was safe to say that non-smokers did not want e-
cigarette use in public because they can be negatively affected by the vapor released from
e-cigarettes.
When an individual non-smoker who has friends or family members that use e-
cigarettes, they appear to have varied perceptions of the health risks to which they are
perceptions and attitudes toward cigarettes and hookah amongst adults in Jordan. The
study gained valuable insight from non-smokers who had family members who smoked
cigarettes and hookah in Jordan. Hookahs are water pipes used to smoke tobacco, coming
in an array of flavors similar to that of e-cigarettes, while having similar health risks as
cigarette smoking (American Lung Association, 2007). The researchers asked a total of
874 participants about accepting a family members’ smoking of hookah. The results
demonstrated that 61.7% of participants disagreed with accepting family members who
smoke hookah. In the same manner, 64.2% of participants disagreed with the statement of
accepting a family member smoking cigarettes. Attitudes of parents toward their sons and
daughters smoking were also apparent, as 80% of participants disagreed with the
hookah. Even parents who smoked hookah themselves had strong disagreements about
their sons or daughters smoking hookah. In the study, when non-smokers were asked
22
about their perception on smoking, they indicated that smoking causes early death.
Although smoking rates are high amongst Jordanians, most participants demonstrated a
significant amount of concern among family members’ smoking status, even if the
parents smoked themselves. Whether a family member smokes or not, smoking does not
appear to be acceptable and participants did not have any positive perceptions towards
A similar study was completed by Chen, Ho, Au, Wang, and Lam (2015) on how
secondhand smoke from cigarettes from family members at home can cause unhappiness
survey where preteens shared their opinions on why secondhand smoke from cigarettes
has negative reactions. Preteens in the survey stated that secondhand smoke was
“unpleasant or gross,” had made them “coughed or chocked,” “dizzy,” and “wanted to
throw up” respectively (Lessov-Schlaggar et al., 2011). Given the negative impact of
tobacco use and the dislike of tobacco use by non-smokers, the associations of smoking
in the household and secondhand exposure in relation to family unhappiness was studied
using cross-sectional data from primary school students in Hong Kong. Results
Children between the ages of 7 and 12 stated that it was hard to avoid the second-hand
smoke at home and hoped that the family member could eventually quit smoking.
coughing and eye irritation, as well as the exacerbation of negative health effects when
about the cost of cigarettes and how this can be a financial burden to the family.
In a similar qualitative study, a participant who had similar concerns stated, “How
can they [smokers] use money for cigarettes? It’s like taking food off the table,” (Yousey,
2007, p. 14,565). Chen et al. (2015) added that an avoidable expenditure that brings harm
family unhappiness. In the same study, researchers found that homes that were not
family happiness. Non-smokers in the family did not experience coughing and eye
irritation due to the lack of second-hand smoke. Additionally, there was no need for
smoke. More importantly, family members did not have to worry about the health of
smoking family members. When there are no smokers in a household, additional money
is not spent on cigarettes; moreover on food or other expenses that are important for the
family. This study demonstrated that when family members were exposed to second-hand
showed dissatisfaction. Whether the dissatisfaction same from the concern of the
smokers’ health or the non-smokers’ health, the cost expense of cigarettes, or the physical
24
negative health effects, this led to an increase in unhappiness within the family household
of smokers.
or vapors around them than smokers. For instance, the attitude of parents whose sons and
daughters smoked in their presence bothered the parents, with the parents expressing how
it bothered them because they did not like thinking about any negative health effects
(Abu-Helalah et al., 2015). Even if the parents were smokers themselves, their sons and
daughters’ smoking was not be accepted due to their concerns of health and safety of
cigarettes. Studies have concluded that family members who smoke in the household
bring unhappiness to other family members (Chen et al., 2015). Due to non-smokers in a
smoke from conventional cigarettes, those who have friends and family who smoke will
autonomy, experiencing changing social networks, and facing new academic challenges
that create stressful transitions into young adulthood (Filipkowski, Heron, & Smyth,
2016). Students may use conventional cigarettes or e-cigarettes to ease their stress caused
25
by the transition to college. Since, e-cigarettes are marketed as safe and socially
accepted by their peers (Berg et al., 2013). Moreover, studies have concluded that college
students are more likely to use alcohol and cigarettes in order to cope with transitional
experimental design using an online survey to assess 1,201 South Korean international
students who studied in the United States. The purpose of this study was to explore the
off campus and determining future predictors of smoking amongst international students.
Results demonstrated that almost half of the respondents had smoked more than 100
cigarettes in their lifetime. Students living off campus smoked more cigarettes than
students living on campus. Students who lived off campus have more opportunities to
smoke as they transition home. Further, smoking had increased in half of the current
participants and one-fourth of the students living on campus. Stress relief was found to be
the primary reason for increased smoking amongst the students who lived off campus,
homesickness (Sa et al., 2013). In relation to the predictors of smoking, the following
themes emerged; students living off campus, students living alone, social influences,
males living in the United States living less than three years, females living in the United
States with longer duration of residence, high level of acculturative stress, moderate to
26
high levels of anxiety and depression, and current smokers being in an environment
This study was completed on international students who had more of a transitional
impact since they were from an overseas country. South Korean international students
study confirmed how international students experience stress and anxiety due to the
separation from their familiar environment; however they found effective ways to cope
with homesickness rather than smoking (Szabo, Ward, & Jose, 2016).
Park, Lee, Shearston, and Weitzman (2017) completed a study that focused on the
patterns of e-cigarette use and levels of psychological distress. Smokers with higher
positive correlation was associated between higher levels of psychological distress and an
increased use of both e-cigarettes and cigarettes. Similar studies have been conducted
consider that cigarette use may provoke depressive symptoms (Bares, 2014). Park et al.
(2017) provided a similar suggestion stating that clinicians should be aware of mental
health issues in their patients who use e-cigarettes since they are susceptible of greater
psychological distress.
In summary, empirical studies have suggested that those with stressors are more
amongst college students who had typical stressors and their way of coping with the said
stressors. Furthermore, the patterns of e-cigarette use, and levels of psychological distress
27
were positively correlated suggesting that higher levels of psychological distress led to
While previous studies have focused on stressors that individuals encounter when
on the association of self-esteem and smoking. The association between stress and self-
esteem in adolescent smoking were examined (Carters & Byrne, 2013). Low stress is
likely to decrease the risk of smoking to the extent that it increases school self-esteem
among adolescents. In other words, adolescents with high stress are at risk of smoking
because their self-esteem can affect them negatively. In connection with previous studies,
college students that were trying to cope with transitional stressors were more likely to
use alcohol and cigarettes (Locke et al., 2015). Indeed, stress does not directly lead to
smoking, but rather influences one’s self-esteem, which places the individual at a higher
risk for smoking (Carters & Byrne, 2013). Students with low self-esteem are at a higher
risk for smoking in order to cope with their problems; similarly, individuals who smoke
Saari, Kentala, and Mattila (2015) conducted a longitudinal cohort study on the
habits were monitored from the ages of 16 to 29, with results indicating that adolescents
who had low levels of self-esteem were more likely to smoke as adults. It is interesting to
note that adolescent self-esteem was not associated with adolescent self-report of
28
smoking. A similar study was completed by Joffer et al. (2014), where the authors
focused on predicting factors found in early adolescence that allowed for smoking in later
attitudes towards smoking, family and intrapersonal factors, gender, binge drinking,
smoking, and the use of smokeless tobacco. The study suggested that the predictive value
of attitudes and strengthening one’s self-esteem during their first six school years
influenced smoking behavior during adolescence. Saari et al. (2015) shared similar
factors that predicted smoking in later life. Both studies shared the same interest on how
self-esteem was associated with smoking. Above all, smoking amongst adolescents was
linked to self-esteem, and both studies confirmed that low self-esteem was associated
Researchers conducted various studies that were associated with smoking and
mental health, especially among adolescents and college students (Sa et al., 2013; Carters
& Byrne, 2013; Joffer et al., 2014; Park et al., 2014; Locke et al., 2015; Saari et al.,
2015). Mantler, Irwin, Morrow, Hall, and Mandich (2015) conducted a study related to
self-esteem and smoking with patients who attempted quitting cigarettes with the help of
a life coach, and how this effort affected the patients’ self-esteem levels. The primary
focus of this study included motivational interviewing via co-active life coaching and its
smoking, and quitting. The study also examined the effect of the intervention itself on 40
participants to intervention groups and sessions that were held for 30 minutes with a
29
Certified Professional Co-Active Coach via telephone or online. Data was collected
intervention. The results of this longitudinal study concluded that participants who
that applying motivational interviewing via co-active life coaching can be effective to
smokers who want to quit. In addition, this type of cessation aid can improve a patient’s
Simultaneously, a smoker’s self-esteem can increase with the help of a cessation aid; in
the study of Mantler et al. (2015), the cessation aid was motivational interviewing via co-
active life coaching. Smokers who eliminate smoking from their daily lives have a higher
Studies have been completed that examined the level of difficulties to exclusively
quit cigarettes and e-cigarettes, to determine which product is harder to quit. Pasquereau,
determined the length of time that a smoker did not smoke or vape when attempting to
smokers or were dual users of both conventional and electronic cigarettes. When the
study was reassessed during a six-month follow up, results concluded some reduction in
in this study ceased smoking cigarettes within the six-month follow-up period, including
0.8% in the group that used e-cigarettes, and 9.5% that did not use either tobacco or e-
cigarettes. In addition, 89.7% of the participants still smoked cigarettes, and 2.4% in that
group became regular electronic cigarette smokers. Furthermore, among dual users who
had previously attempted to quit, 14.5% stopped smoking cigarettes, with 9.6% of that
group quitting both cigarettes and e-cigarettes. However, it should be noted that 4.9% of
cigarettes, and 42.3% continued to associate as dual users. Researchers concluded that
dual users were likely to make an attempt to quit, and during the time of quitting, the
number of cigarettes was reduced to half the number of cigarettes initially smoked.
Yuyan et al. (2016) studied e-cigarette smokers who had previously attempted to
quit, determining how long they successfully ceased e-cigarette smoking. A longitudinal
Within the group, 2,454 individuals participated in the one year follow up assessment
Results showed that 21.6% were exclusive cigarette smokers who ceased smoking for
more than 30 days, while only 11% of e-cigarette smokers ceased vaping for more than
cigarettes during their attempt to quit were less likely to quit electronic cigarette usage for
more than 30 days. Similar to the previous research of Pasquereau et al. (2017), cigarette
smokers who attempted to quit were more likely to switch to e-cigarettes. Those smokers
were still consuming nicotine but in a different way, which appeared no different from
31
smoking conventional cigarettes. The Yuyan et al. (2016) study demonstrated that there
were more cigarette smokers than electronic cigarette users who ceased using the product
Polosa, Caponnetto, Cibella, and Le-Houezec (2015) completed a pilot study that
was aimed at cigarette smokers who were provided e-cigarettes to examine whether the
number of cigarettes was reduced. The participants included 71 adult smokers at the
beginning of the survey, with 49 participants completing the 6- and 12-month follow-up.
At the six month follow up, results demonstrated that the number of cigarettes smoked
per day decreased to a mean of 24.9 to 4.0. At the 12-month follow up, the number of
cigarettes per day decreased to a mean of 2.6. Approximately 40% of participants were
successful at quitting; 25.4% reduced the number of cigarettes smoked; 33.8% kept the
habit of smoking, and 31% were unsuccessful at completing the follow up. Nevertheless,
the study highlighted that 66.2% of the participants who used e-cigarettes to help aid in
quitting smoking cigarettes were successful whether the number of cigarettes decreased,
or they ceased smoking permanently. Polosa et al. (2015) concluded that success rates of
smoking cessation appeared higher compared to those who continued smoking behaviors.
Researchers did observe the changes in nicotine strength during the time of the study, as
participants were lowering the nicotine strength from their e-cigarettes from 12 to 18
time with e-cigarette use, this indicated a way for smokers to gradually cease smoking or
cigarettes after a smoker made an attempt to quit (Polosa et al., 2015; Yuyan et al., 2016;
Pasquereau et al., 2017). The Pasquereau et al. (2017) study concluded that dual users
were likely to make an attempt to quit, whereas it appeared harder for cigarette smokers
to quit due to switching over to use e-cigarettes. In contrast, the Yuyan et al. (2016) study
highlighted that cigarette smokers were the group that stayed away from nicotine
products for more than 30 days compared to that of their e-cigarette smoking
counterparts. Finally, the Polosa et al. (2015) study concluded that cigarette smokers had
higher successful cessation rates when e-cigarettes were used to aid in the cessation of
appeared higher than that of electronic cigarettes. Dual users appeared more likely to
make an attempt to quit due to their use of e-cigarettes as an aid to quit smoking.
Additionally, former cigarette users who switched to e-cigarettes and e-cigarette users
found it difficult to quit. Smokers can lower the amount of nicotine in e-cigarettes but
that only indicates they are reducing the amount of nicotine and is therefore not
considered a form of quitting. Thus, without the help of e-cigarettes, cigarette smoking
METHODOLOGY
Participants
California. Approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board
(IRB) at California State University, Dominguez Hills. The sample consisted of 550
individuals (62% female) Demographic background was also collected and was broken
down into the following: e-cigarette users (7%), conventional cigarette users (5%), dual
users (5%), and non-user (83%). The ethnic make-up of the sample was Hispanic (n=316;
Asian/Pacific Islander (n=51; 9.4%). The participants were recruited via Blackboard
researcher first contacted various professors from the psychology department, requesting
permission to utilize one of their current courses for recruitment. After permission was
the study. The announcement described the study as an online survey measuring people’s
perceptions of electronic cigarettes and tobacco use. After consent was obtained, the
participants were able to complete the online survey. The survey included 273 questions
participant was provided extra credit or course credit for participating in the study if they
gender, ethnicity, primary language spoken, current marital status, current employment
status, total household income, number of individuals in their household, highest level of
education completed, and current class standing within the university. Respondents were
also asked about their perception, level of stress, self-esteem, and cessation in regard to
the use of both e-cigarettes and conventional cigarettes. For example, respondents were
asked about their perception of how harmful it is breathing other peoples’ e-cigarette
smoke, whether they saw themselves as successful in either a true or false statement,
when they had last attempted to quit smoking or vaping, and the length of time they
Measures
comprised of 10 questions that were summed to obtain the final self-esteem calculation
for each subject. Each of the questions that comprised the self-esteem scale were scored
The internal consistency reliability for the self-esteem scale was very strong, as
indicated by Cronbach’s Alpha. Cronbach’s Alpha considered any score that was high as
being reliable. In the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, reliability was indicated at α=.835.
35
Perceived Stress Scale
The Perceived Stress Scale was used to measure stress. The scale comprised of
nine questions that were summed to obtain the final stress calculation for each subject.
Each of the questions that comprised of the stress scale were scored on a Likert scale of 1
The internal consistency reliability for the perceived stress scale was strong, as
demonstrated by Cronbach’s Alpha. In the Perceived Stress Scale, the reliability was
α=.849.
The following statistical tests were used to test all of the research questions and
corresponding hypotheses. All of the analyses were completed using the Statistical
The first hypothesis evaluated the relationship between the manners of e-cigarette
users’ perceptions of smoking versus that of non-users. To test the first hypothesis, an
independent t-test was used. A t-test was completed to determine if there were differences
between the groups of e-cigarette users and non-users on the dependent variable
perception of safety. Respondents were asked how harmful they felt about breathing
another person’s e-cigarette vapor. Answers ranged from very harmful to one’s health to
smoking. To test the second hypothesis, an independent t-test was used. A t-test was
36
completed to determine if there were statistical differences between the groups of
The third hypothesis evaluated non-smokers that have less favorable opinions that
e-cigarette users of e-cigarette use in public places. To test the third aim, an independent
t-test was used. A t-test was completed to determine if there were statistical differences
between the groups of non-users and e-cigarette users in relation to the dependent
variable of irritation. Respondents were asked how much e-cigarette vape bothered them
when in its presence. In addition, respondents were asked how likely they were to make a
face, a coughing noise, a loud comment, or some other signal to get the smoker to realize
that their e-cigarette usage bothered them when used in a non-smoking area of a public
place.
The fourth hypothesis evaluated participants who have friends and family who
opinions with e-cigarette use around them than non-smokers who do not have friends and
family who smoke. To test this hypothesis an independent t-test was used. A t-test was
completed to determine if there were statistical differences between the groups of friends
and family who smoke conventional cigarettes and friends and family who smoke e-
asked how much e-cigarette vape bothered them when in their presence. In addition,
respondents were asked how likely they were to make a face, a coughing noise, a loud
37
comment, or some other signal to get the smoker to realize that e-cigarette usage bothered
The fifth hypothesis evaluated individuals with high stress and if they were more
correlation matrix with the variables non-user, e-cigarettes only, conventional cigarettes
only, and dual users was used. The stress scale was used to understand any relationships
between the variables. An ANOVA was conducted to determine if there were differences
between the groups of e-cigarette users, conventional cigarette users, dual users, and non-
The sixth hypothesis evaluated individuals with low self-esteem and if they were
more likely to use e-cigarettes or conventional cigarettes. To test the sixth hypothesis, an
ANOVA was conducted to determine if there was a difference between the groups in
The seventh hypothesis evaluated the relation of cessation to the length of time a
person has stayed off conventional cigarettes or e-cigarettes when attempting to quit
smoking. To test the seventh aim, a correlation matrix was completed with the variables
quitting, how long they stayed off e-cigarettes, quitting, and the length of time they
ceased using conventional cigarettes This aided in better understanding the relationships
The test determined if there was a difference in the mean of the two questions of
quitting and length of time they ceased e-cigarette or traditional cigarette use, if there was
cigarette user, and dual users), and if there was any interaction between the two factors.
39
CHAPTER 4
RESULTS
Sample Characteristics
Table 1 shows sample demographics for usage groups e-cigarette users (n = 38),
conventional cigarette users (n = 26), dual users (n = 26), and non-smokers (n = 440). In
Table 1
EC User 38 7.2
CC Users 26 4.9
Non-User 440 83
Gender
The age of the total sample ranged from 18 to 62 years of age (M = 23. SD =5.9,
61% female). The average age was 23.03 years (SD = 5.9) for the usage groups. Of the
40
550-total sample, 336 (61.1%) were females and 204 (37.1%) were males, and 10 were
not specified by the participants. Table 2 shows the ethnic make-up of the sample, which
were Hispanic (n=316; 58.8%), Caucasian/White (n=70; 13%), African American (n=51;
9.4%), Asian/Pacific Islander (n=51; 9.4%), and the rest of the ethnic population was
specified as other.
Table 2
Caucasian/White 70 13
African-American 51 9.4
Table 3 shows the current class standing from the sample population. All of the
participants were in their undergraduate program except three, who were completing their
203 (43.5%) were Juniors, 101 (21.6%) were Seniors, 100 (21.4%) were Sophomores,
Post 3 .6
Baccalaureate/Graduate
Regarding household income, 53.5% of the sample made less than $30,000, and
the rest (46.5%) identified a household income of $30,000 or more. Overall, this
variables across the usage groups of e-cigarette users, conventional cigarette users, dual
users, and non-smokers. An ANOVA, where the dependent variable was age and the
independent variable were the usage groups, found that there were significant differences
between the groups. A one-way ANOVA was conducted with age at the dependent
variable and the usage groups as the independent variables. The analysis was significant;
Levene’s statistic showed that the assumption of homogeneity of variance was violated,
so Robust test was assessed (F-Welch (3, 56.3) = 7.1, p = 0.00). Bonferroni post-hoc
42
analysis determined that the mean age of the conventional cigarette users ( M = 27.1, SD
= 8.1 ) was higher than non-smokers ( M = 22.9, SD = 6.0), and the e-cigarette users (M
= 21.2, SD = 2.8).
A Chi-Square Test was conducted between gender and the usage groups which
found significant difference in proportions χ² (3, N = 520) = 9.3, p .03. Pearson Chi-
Square indicated that there was a significant difference in gender. In particular, the
percentage of males (65.4%) was very high in the dual user groups compared to other
groups (non-smoker 36.5%, e-cigarette users 36.8%, and conventional cigarette users
46.2%). In contrast, the percentage of females (34.6%) was significantly low in the dual
user groups compared to other groups (non-smoker 63.5%, e-cigarette users 63.2%, and
To find the difference in proportions between ethnicity and the usage groups, a
Chi-Square Test was used to assess the difference in proportions between ethnicity and
the usage groups. Pearson Chi-Square indicated that there was a significant difference
between ethnicity and the usage groups (χ² (18, N = 520) = 39.4, p .00). The percentage
of Hispanics in the dual usage groups (19.2%) was much lower than the percentage of
users (84.6%). In Asians, under dual use, the percentage was significantly higher (30.8%)
than the other groups; non-smoker (8.4%), e-cigarette users (10.5%), and conventional
cigarette users (3.8%). Furthermore, in the Caucasian group, dual use (34.6%) and
conventional cigarette use (26.9%), were significantly low compared to the other groups;
following demographics by usage groups: Marital Status, Work Status, and Household
Income. None of the analyses were significant. Pearson Chi-Square indicated that there
was no significant difference between all three demographics by usage groups. There was
no significant difference in proportions between: Marital Status (χ² (12, N = 520) = 7.1, p
= .85) and usage groups, Work Status (χ² (18, N = 520) = 10.1, p = .93) and usage groups,
Household Income (χ² (33, N = 520) = 33.7, p = .43) and usage groups.
Hypothesis 1A proposed that e-cigarette users will perceive vaping as safer than
non-users. An independent t-test found that there was a significant difference between e-
cigarette users and non-users in their perception of the safety of vaping (t(73) = -2.8, p =
.00). The mean safety rating for e-cigarette users (M = 2.5, SD = .6) was higher than non-
smokers (M = 2.0, SD = .71). In order to rule out that age was the actual driver for the
difference between e-cigarette users and non-users, ANCOVA confirmed that this
difference was significant even when age was added as a covariate (F (2, 72) = 4.160, p =
.02).
safer than non-users. An independent t-test found that there was no significant difference
between conventional cigarette users and non-users in their perception of the safety of
vaping (t(73) = -1.2, p = .25). The ANCOVA using age as the covariate confirmed that
there was no significant difference between these groups (F(2, 72) = .67, p = .52).
44
Hypothesis 1C proposed that non-smokers have less favorable opinions of e-
non-smokers were less bothered by the use of e-cigarettes in their presence than e-
cigarette smokers. The mean level of irritation with vaping in their presence for non-
smokers (M = 2.9, SD = 1.2) was stronger (lower) than e-cigarette users (M = 4.2, SD =
.97). The analysis was significant. An independent t-test found that non-smokers were
significantly bothered by e-cigarette use in their presence than e-cigarette users (t(444) =
-6.0, p = .00). In order to rule out that age was the actual driver for the difference between
non-smokers and e-cigarette users, ANCOVA confirmed that this difference was
significant even when age was added as a covariant (F(2, 493) = 21.83, p = .00).
The mean likelihood of making a disapproving gesture when e-cigarette use was
in their presence among non-smokers (M = 3.1, SD = 1.4) was stronger (lower) than e-
cigarette users (M = 3.9, SD = 1.4). An independent t-test found that non-smokers were
significantly more likely to make a disapproving gesture when e-cigarette use was in their
presence (t(444) = -3.3, p = .00). In order to rule out that age was the actual driver for the
difference between e-cigarette users and non-users, ANCOVA confirmed that this
difference was significant even when age was added as a covariant (F (2, 493) = 7.19, p =
.00).
Hypothesis 1D proposed that those who have friends and family who smoke
conventional cigarettes or e-cigarettes, had less favorable opinions about e-cigarette use
around them compared to those who did not have friends and family who smoked or
vaped. The mean level of irritation with vaping in their presence for those with friends
45
and family who did not smoke or vape (M = 3.1, SD = 1.3) was stronger (lower) than
those who have friends and family who smoked or vaped (M = 3.5, SD = 1.4). An
independent t-test found that those who did not have friends and family who smoked or
vaped were significantly bothered by e-cigarette use in their presence than those who had
friends and family who smoked or vaped (t(171.21) = -2.9, p = .00). In order to rule out
that age was the actual driver for the difference between non-smokers and e-cigarette
users, ANCOVA confirmed that this difference was significant even when age was added
The mean likelihood of making a disapproving gesture when e-cigarette use was
in their presence among those who did not have friends and family who smoked or vaped
(M = 3.2, SD = 1.4) was stronger (lower) than those who had friends and family who
smoked or vaped (M = 3.7, SD = 1.4) in their presence. An independent t-test found that
those with friends and family who did not smoke or vape were significantly more likely
to (Q74) make a disapproving gesture when smoke or vape use was in their presence
(t(502) = -3.3, p = .00). In order to rule out that age was the actual driver for the
difference between non-smokers and e-cigarette users, ANCOVA confirmed that this
difference was significant even when age was added as a covariant (F (2, 501) = 5.55, p =
.00).
Hypothesis 2A proposed that those with higher levels of stress were more likely
cigarette users. The analysis was not significant. An ANOVA determined that there were
no significant differences in stress levels in any of the groups (F (3, 502) = .96, p = .41).
These results did not support the hypothesis that those with more stress were more likely
though stress did not significantly affect the independent variable, there was a significant
groups which was consistent with the findings from ANOVA. All of the Pearson
Correlation coefficients between stress and user groups were <.07. None of these were
Hypothesis 2B proposed that those with lower self-esteem were more likely to use
way ANOVA was carried out to determine if mean levels of self-esteem were higher
among e-cigarette or conventional cigarette users (F (3,500) = .31, p = .81). The analysis
was not significant. These results did not support the hypothesis that those with lower
ANCOVA using age as the covariate confirmed that there was no significant difference
A Pearson Correlation Test was conducted between each group of users and the
amount of time they attempted to quit e-cigarettes. Results showed that non-smokers (r =
.30, p = .01, N = 69) who have smoked e-cigarettes in the past were positively associated
with quitting for longer periods of time. In contrast, e-cigarette users who had smoked e-
cigarettes (r = -.39, p = .00, N = 69) in the past were negatively associated with quitting
for longer periods of time. This demonstrated that e-cigarette smokers quit for shorter
periods of time. The other variables of conventional cigarette users and dual users were
users and the amount of time they had attempted to quit conventional cigarettes. Results
showed that there was no relationship between user groups and the amount of time they
DISCUSSION
cigarettes and conventional cigarettes held among college students. It was hypothesized
that e-cigarette users would perceive e-cigarette use as a safer alternative of smoking than
that of non-users. It was also hypothesized that conventional cigarette smokers would
also perceive e-cigarette use as a safer alternative than conventional cigarette use, and
that non-smokers would have a less favorable opinion of e-cigarette smoking in public
places than that of e-cigarette users. A final hypothesis also stated that individuals who
had family and friends who smoked conventional cigarettes or e-cigarettes would have a
less favorable opinion with e-cigarette use around them than that of non-smokers who did
not have friends and family who use conventional or electronic cigarettes. This proposed
research also investigated the use of e-cigarettes and conventional cigarettes in relation to
stress, self-esteem, and the likelihood to use these products. It is further hypothesized that
individuals who experienced stress were more likely to use e-cigarettes than conventional
cigarettes. Similarly, students with low self-esteem were more likely to use e-cigarettes or
conventional cigarettes. A secondary purpose to this study was to determine the cessation
towards e-cigarettes and conventional cigarettes amongst college students. It was finally
hypothesized that it was more difficult to quit conventional cigarettes than e-cigarettes.
49
Perceptions of E-Cigarettes
Findings confirmed the hypothesis that e-cigarette users perceive e-cigarette use
as a safer alternative of smoking than non-users a significant difference between the two
groups. Findings are consistent with prior research. For instance, Case et al. (2016), did a
formative study on the perceptions of e-cigarettes among undergraduate students that are
either e-cigarette users or non-users. Study found that e-cigarette users believed that e-
cigarettes were less harmful than conventional cigarettes whereas non-users reported
having negative or neutral attitudes toward e-cigarette use. In this situation, a non-user
stated that e-cigarette use should be prohibited from campus because of the exposure to
the chemicals in vapors. Further e-cigarette users perceived that e-cigarette use are
approved by their peers. In contrast, non-users perceived that none of their peers or their
family would approve of e-cigarettes because of the negative social stigma associated
with use. Therefore, there was a significant difference between e-cigarette users and non-
users in their perceptions of e-cigarette use in this current study and previous literature
review.
difference between the two groups. Findings are consistent with the results of the study.
For example, the research from Volesky et al. (2016), found that more than three-quarters
of the participants who are current and former cigarette smokers had positive perceptions
cigarettes were an effective way to quit smoking, improve their health, and were
50
considered harmless. Furthermore, a cohort study completed by Choi and Forster (2013)
found that current or former conventional cigarette smokers also had positive perceptions
of e-cigarettes. More than half of the participants (52%) in their study agreed that e-
cigarettes were less harmful than cigarettes. The remaining participants mentioned that e-
cigarettes could be used as a cessation tool and were therefore considered less addictive
than cigarettes. Literature reviews demonstrated conventional cigarette smokers and non-
users having had similar perceptions; e-cigarettes are safe to use. Whether it was
conventional cigarette smokers or former conventional smokers who did not smoke
cigarettes, studies found that there were no differences in their perceptions of vaping.
In the present study, participants who were cigarette users’ and non-smokers’
were given the question about the perception of safety of vaping. Both usage groups,
cigarette users’ and non-smokers’ answers showed no significant difference. Since both
usage groups do not use e-cigarettes, their answers could be generalized to what they
already know about e-cigarettes. Therefore, the results showed no significant difference
between both usage groups due to the generalization of the answers about e-cigarettes.
Findings confirmed the hypothesis that non-smokers had less favorable opinions
cigarette use in their presence, more so than e-cigarette users. In addition non-smokers
were significantly more likely to make disapproving gestures when e-cigarette use was in
their presence. Findings are consistent with prior research. Take the research of Martínez-
Sánchez et al. (2014), a study assessed attitudes toward e-cigarette use in indoor
workplaces and selected public and private venues. Half of the participants, consisting of
51
non-users, disagreed with the use of e-cigarettes in any indoor public places. The highest
percentage of disagreement with the use of e-cigarettes in schools, hospitals, health care
centers, and hospitality venues were from non-smokers. Furthermore, half of the
participants were not in favor of the sale and marketing of e-cigarettes. This highlights
how non-users are bothered by the use and sale of e-cigarettes in public places. In a
similar fashion, an online questionnaire studied the perceptions of attitudes and risk in
relation to general practitioners and tobacco counselors (Van Gucht & Baeyens, 2016).
More than 80% of the respondents agreed that e-cigarette use should be prohibited in
public places since people within the vicinity of vapor are exposed to second-hand
smoke. Given these findings from literature reviews, non-smokers had less favorable
opinions of e-cigarette smoking in public places than their e-cigarette using counterparts.
Moreover, studies showed that non-smokers were significantly more likely disapprove
unfavorable opinions about e-cigarettes. Previous study from Case et al. (2016), the
college students in their sample population were aware of the dangers of e-cigarettes and
had less unfavorable opinions about them. Similar to the current study, college students
who were non-users may have been aware of secondhand smoke from e-cigarette
therefore, they have unfavorable opinions about e-cigarette use in public places. For these
reasons, the results in the current study, the non-smokers were significantly bothered by
who smoked conventional cigarettes or e-cigarettes would have a less favorable opinion
with e-cigarette use around them than non-smokers who do not have friends and family
who use conventional cigarettes or e-cigarettes. Those who did not have friends and
family who smoked or vaped were significantly bothered by e-cigarette use in their
presence than those who had friends and family who smoked or vaped. Additionally
those with friends and family who did not smoke or vape were significantly more likely
disapprove when smoke or vape use was in their presence. The likelihood of making a
disapproving gesture when e-cigarette use was in their presence among those who did not
have friends and family who smoked or vaped was stronger than those who had friends
and family who smoked or vaped in their presence. Findings are consistent with prior
literature reviews. Specifically, Abu-Helalal et al. (2015), gained insight from non-
smokers who had family members who smoked cigarettes and hookah. More than half of
the participants in their study who had family members who smoked had a hard time
accepting that a family member smoked hookah or conventional cigarettes. The attitudes
of parents whose sons and daughters that smoked were negative as well. Furthermore,
parents who smoked hookah themselves had strong disagreements about their sons or
daughters smoking hookah. This is an example of those who had family members who
smoked had less favorable opinions of smoking; those who smoked and had family
members that smoked, also had less favorable opinions of those who smoked.
Furthermore, Chen et al. (2015) also confirmed the findings by researching opinions from
participants who had family members who did smoke. Children between the ages of 7
53
and 12 who were exposed to secondhand smoke claimed that the smoke caused coughing
and eye irritation. Furthermore, children of smokers were dissatisfied of their family
members that smoked stating that it led to family unhappiness. On the contrary, homes
that were not exposed to secondhand smoke or tobacco-related products were associated
Non-smokers in the family did not experience coughing and eye irritation whereas
smoker’s family members did. This is an example of those who have family members
who smoked were bothered by smoke in their presence and more likely made a
disapproving gesture. In this case, family members were dissatisfied. Individuals who had
family and friends who smoked conventional cigarettes or e-cigarettes had a less
favorable opinion with e-cigarette use around them than non-smokers who did not have
Findings confirmed the hypothesis that individuals who experienced high stress
stress in any of the groups. Furthermore, there was no relationship between stress and
usage groups which was consistent with the findings. Findings are not consistent with
prior research. Previous literature reviews has shown that students with high stress were
students who studied in the United States (Sa et al., 2013). This study found that smoking
54
behaviors amongst international students living on campus were considered a stress
relief. Students in this study increased their amount of smoking due to higher levels of
stress. In summation, this study found consistent findings that cigarette smoking was
Another empirical study found that patterns of e-cigarette use were positively
correlated with the levels of psychological distress (Park et al., 2017). In this study,
results showed a positive correlation that was associated between higher levels of
cigarettes. Even though empirical studies had shown that individuals who experienced
high levels of stress were likely to use e-cigarettes or conventional cigarettes, this current
smoking behaviors. Further, according to the data given from the participants at the
University, Pearson Correlation showed no relationship between stress and usage groups
The present study was a novel attempt to investigate whether college students
who experience high stress were more likely to use e-cigarettes or conventional
between stress levels and the use of e-cigarettes or conventional cigarettes could be the
samples taken from different participants. In the current study, local college students at a
specific four year University were observed. Previous research by Sa et al. (2013) on
Further, the study was a non-experimental design which makes their sample less
55
representatives. Another study in the literature review, Park et al. (2017) differed from
the current study because it had a formidable sample. Their sample size of 36,697 (628
for the subgroup of current and former e-cigarette users) was larger than the current study
of 550 (38 for the subgroup of e-cigarette users) which gives it more power to find a
difference between these groups. The difference in sample size in Park et al. (2017) and
the difference in audience surveyed in Sa et al. (2013) could account for the current study
differing conclusion.
difference between stress levels and the use of e-cigarettes or conventional cigarettes
could be the given time of survey. The survey was distributed in late September when
class had already been in session for over one month. By this time, students have already
been acclimated to their classes and feel comfortable about the classes. Previous studies
have found factors that lead to stress in students were during the transition period where
students had problems adapting to their new environment (Bhujade, 2017). In addition,
the current study sample demographics show the highest class standing were juniors and
next were seniors from undergraduate programs. This could be evident that the
participants in this current study had more than two years of education and being in the
school environment were not fairly new. Therefore, the results showed no associations to
stress levels and the use of smoking or vaping because the participants demonstrated no
Findings confirmed the hypothesis that those with lower self-esteem were more
and usage groups. Findings are not consistent with prior research. Previous studies found
that those with lower self-esteem were more likely to use e-cigarettes or conventional
esteem and the predictability of smoking found that self-esteem was positively associated
with smoking in adulthood (Saari et al., 2015). Self-esteem did not affect the adolescent
at the current time, but it affected them later in their adulthood. Within the same topic of
self-esteem, Joffer et al. (2014) found factors that predicted smoking in later adolescence.
Researchers suggested that the predictive value of attitudes and strengthening of one’s
self-esteem during their first six school years influenced smoking behavior during
adolescence. Although previous literature supported that those with lower self-esteem
were more likely to use e-cigarettes or conventional cigarettes, it was unable to be met
and the likelihood to use cigarettes or e-cigarettes could be that the different scales were
distributed compared to each study. Previous research from Saari et al. (2015) used
Lawrence Self-Esteem Questionnaire (LAWSEQ). Joffer et al. (2014) used their own
questionnaire which differs from the current study (which used the Rosenberg’s Self-
Esteem Scale) and the Saari et al. (2015) study (which used the LAWSEQ). Further, the
participants from Saari et al. (2015) study were from Finland. This could account for the
difference in the current study which takes place in United States. The difference in the
57
types of self-esteem measures and the country of origin could be the reasons for the
differing result.
Another possible explanation for this result of no relationship between low self-
esteem and the likelihood to use cigarettes or e-cigarettes could be that the students from
the sample population may not have smoked or tried cigarettes during their adolescent
years; therefore, they may have a sufficient amount of self-esteem at the time the survey
was taken. Previous research has indicated that adolescents who experience low self-
esteem can be a predictability of smoking later in adulthood (Saari et al., 2015). The
current study shows that more than half of the participants are not smokers. This could be
an indicator that they have higher self-esteem, or their self-esteem levels were
sufficiently high during adolescence that they do not use any smoking products during
their adulthood. The participants’ high self-esteem during adolescence may have
influenced the results of this study, which found no associations between low self-esteem
Findings confirmed the hypothesis that it was more difficult to quit conventional
cigarettes than e-cigarettes. First, a Pearson Correlation Test was conducted between each
group of users and the amount of time they attempted to quit e-cigarettes. Results
demonstrated that non-smokers who had smoked e-cigarettes in the past were positively
associated with quitting for a longer period of time. E-cigarette users who had smoked e-
cigarettes in the past were negatively associated with quitting for a longer period of time.
58
Furthermore, conventional cigarette users and dual users were not significantly correlated
with quitting for longer periods of time for e-cigarettes. Non-smokers appeared to abstain
from e-cigarette use longer than smokers. The current study’s findings were consistent
Yuyan et al. (2016) which demonstrated that the success rates for e-cigarette cessation
were higher among non-users than e-cigarette users. The taste, the expense and the look
and feel of the device were motivating factors to stop vaping among non-users compared
Finally, a Pearson Correlation Test was conducted in this current study between
each group of users and the amount of time they attempted to quit conventional
cigarettes. Results showed that there was no relationship or any significant difference
between user groups (e-cigarette users, conventional cigarette users, and dual users) and
the amount of time they attempted to quit conventional cigarettes. In the attempt to quit
smoking cigarettes from cigarette users, the Yuyan et al. (2016) study showed that some
cigarettes. Therefore, Yuyan et al (2016) concluded that there were more cigarette
smokers than e-cigarette smokers who ceased using the product for more than 30 days.
replaced their smoking behaviors to include that of vaping. For these reasons, cigarette
smokers had higher rates of abstaining from conventional cigarettes because they found
other smoking alternatives. The Polosa et al. (2015) study confirmed the manner in which
conventional cigarette smokers decreased or ceased their cigarette smoking habits with
59
the help of e-cigarettes. The nicotine strength in the e-cigarettes was gradually lowered so
smokers were able to wean off nicotine over time. Similarly to the current study,
conventional cigarette smokers and dual users. The cigarette smokers switched over to e-
users reduced the consumption of cigarettes initially smoked while smoking e-cigarettes.
In this case, dual users were more likely to attempt to quit, whereas cigarette smokers still
Findings confirmed the hypothesis that it was more difficult to quit smoking
conventional cigarettes than e-cigarettes. Previous studies showed that smokers who
quitting conventional cigarettes was not as difficult compared to vaping (Polosa et al.
2015; Yuyan et al. 2016; Pasquereau et al. 2017). Only non-users appeared to stay off e-
cigarettes longer than e-cigarette users when attempting to quit vaping (Yuyan et al,
2016). Therefore the hypothesis was not met as it has been concluded that it is more
difficult for e-cigarette users to quit vaping compared to conventional cigarette smokers
The current study differs from the three previous studies (Polosa et al. 2015;
Yuyan et al. 2016; Pasquereau et al. 2017) in that these previous studies only look at
conventional cigarette smokers or e-cigarette users, whereas the current study looks at
both by comparing e-cigarette users to conventional cigarette users. The previous studies
do not compare these two groups whereas they look at one or the other.
60
Further, a potential explanation for this outcome within the current study agrees
with previous research of conventional cigarette smokers being able to quit cigarettes for
longer periods of time by switching to e-cigarettes (Polosa et al., 2015; Yuyan et al.,
2016; Pasquereau et al., 2017). This current study demonstrates how e-cigarette users
showed a negative correlation for quitting for longer periods of time to those similar to
the Yuyan et al. (2016) study. The participants in the current study who were former
Since e-cigarettes seem more appealing and carry the misconception that they are an aid
to cessation of conventional cigarettes (Volesky et al., 2016; Choi & Forster, 2013; Xu et
al., 2016; Case et al., 2016 ), e-cigarette users in the current study may have decided to
current study showed a negative correlation between e-cigarette users and quitting for
Limitations
At the time of this current study, e-cigarettes were fairly new to the public. Not all
participants of the study may have had a strong knowledge or an exposure towards e-
cigarettes. Some participants may not have tried e-cigarettes to where they may have
attempted to abstain for 30 days or more. Depending on the marketing and advertising of
e-cigarettes near the university, or if any of the participants’ friends and family used e-
cigarettes, respondents could have little knowledge of e-cigarettes, therefore not being
able to fully answer the questions in the manner in which they were attended. This could
study took place. The sample provided may not be generalized to other regions of the
factors, individuals who live in areas that have high crimes; college students may
experience different stressors than other people, and so forth. There can be several factors
Finally, the participants may not have been open and forthright about their use
and personal smoking history. For example, some participants may have differing
definitions of what it means to be a smoker, social smoker, or non-user. This study did
not provide definition of these terms for the participants; instead, these terms were
applied based on the answers received. Additionally, participants may not have been open
about their use due to cultural reasons. Perhaps some participants may have opted to keep
their smoking history personal even though the survey stated that participation is
anonymous.
appear as educated; therefore, this study demonstrated a need for further investigation
psychological effects of e-cigarettes are detrimental since there have appeared to be many
smoking.
individuals. This in turn, can provide information to the field of clinical psychology and
can aid in improving both education and cessation programs aimed towards conventional
Recommendations
awareness about the dangers of e-cigarettes. Just like conventional cigarettes are sold
with warning labels on the cigarette packages, so should e-cigarettes. Smoke shops and
convenience stores that sell e-cigarettes should have posters with warning labels visible
to the consumers.
consumers so that they will know the truth and not carry on common misconceptions
individuals outside of college. The more data that is collected, the validity on the research
would be stronger; therefore, the data would be more valid and reliable. It is also
future studies should focus on smoking behaviors; ensuring that researchers account for
researchers can clearly define social smoking, regular smoking, and non-smoking before
cigarettes is equally important, as there are many different types of smoking devices that
Summary
The purpose of this research was to investigate the perceptions of e-cigarettes and
conventional cigarettes amongst college students. Most of the hypotheses in this study
were not met. The hypothesis that was met was related to concerns and less favorable
opinions of others around e-cigarette and conventional cigarette use. This study found
that there was no difference in the perception between conventional cigarette smokers
and e-cigarette users. Furthermore, the use of e-cigarette or conventional cigarette had no
psychological effects, and it appeared that it was easier to quit conventional cigarettes
compared to e-cigarettes.
64
Although most hypotheses in this study had not met, previous studies and within
the literature supported the hypotheses in this study. Further research is recommended as
REFERENCES
Abu-Helalah, M. A., Alshraideh, H. A., Al-Serhan, A. A., Nesheiwat, A. I., Da’na, M., &
Babb S., Malarcher A., Schauer G., Asman K., & Jamal A. Quitting Smoking Among
Bares, C. B. (2014). Gender, Depressive Symptoms, and Daily Cigarette Use. Journal Of
Barros, V.V., Kozasa, E. H., Formagini, T. D., Pereira, L. H., & Ronzani, T. M. (2015).
Biener, L., & Hargraves, J. L. (2014). A Longitudinal Study of Electronic Use Among a
Cessation and Motivation to Quit. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 17(2), 127-133.
Doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu200
Brandt, A. M. (2007). The Cigarette Century. New York, NY: Basic Books
67
Students: A Brief Review. Indian Journal Of Health And Wellbeing, 8(7), 748-
Caraballo, R. S., Shafer, P. R., Patel, D., Davis, K. C., & McAfee, T. A. (2017). Quit
Carters, M. A., & Byrne, D. G. (2013). The role of stress and area-specific self-esteem in
doi:10.1111/ajpy.12019
Case, K., Crook, B., Lazard, A., & Mackert, M. (2016). Formative research to identify
doi:10.1080/07448481.2016.1158180
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). E-cigarette Ads and Youth. Retrieve
Georgia: Author.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Health effects of cigarette smoking.
Retrieve from:
https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/health_effects/effects_cig
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Morbidity and Mortality Weekly
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/mm6552a1.htm?s_cid=mm6552a1_w
Chen, J. J., Ho, S. Y., Au, W. M., Wang, M. P., & Lam, T. H. (2015). Family Smoking,
14559-14570. doi:10.3390/ijerph121114559
Chen, J., Bullen, C., & Dirks, K. (2017). A comparative health risk assessment of
doi:http://dx.doi.org.tcsedsystem.idm.oclc.org/10.3390/ijerph14040382
Choi, K., & Forster, J. (2013). Characteristics Associated With Awareness, Perceptions,
doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300947
Cook, S. A. (2014). When Smoking Was Chic. Canada’s History. 94(2), 43-48.
Retrieved from
http:/libproxy.csudh.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct
=true&db=aph&AN=95429473&site=ehost-live&scope=site
69
Cooper, M., Loukas, A., Harrell, M. B., & Perry, C. L. (2017). College students’
Cox, S., Kośmider, L., McRobbie, H., Goniewics, M., Kimber, C., Doig, M., & Dawkins,
L. (2016). E-cigarette puffing patterns associated with high and low nicotine e-
liquid strength: effects on toxicant and carcinogen exposure. BMC Public Health,
Czogala, J., Goniewicz, M. L., Fidelus, B., Zielinska-Danch, W., Travers, M. J., &
Delene, L. M., & Brogowicz, A. A. (1990). Student health needs attitudes and behavior
Farasalinos, K. E., Romagna, G., Tsiapras, D., Kyrzopoulos, S., Spyrou, A., & Voudris,
Retrieve from:
70
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-
cigarette-report-2014-federal-trade-commission-smokeless-tobacco-
Filipkowski, K. B., Heron, K. E., & Smyth, J. M. (2016). Early Adverse Experiences and
717-728. doi:10.5993/AJHB.40.6.4
Harrell, P. T., Simmons, V. N., Piñeiro, B., Correa, J. B., Menzie, N. S., Meltzer, L. R., &
... Brandon, T. H. (2015). E-cigarettes and expectancies: why do some users keep
Jamal, A., Phillips, E., Gentzke, A. S., Homa, D. M., Babb, S. D., King, B. A., & Neff, L.
doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6702a1
Joffer, J., Burell, G., Bergström, E., Stenlund, H., Sjörs, L., & Jerdén, L. (2014).
1035-1051. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1296
Lebrun-Harris, L. A., Fiore, M. C., Naomi, T., & Ngo-Metger, Q. (2015). Cigarette
doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301691
Lessov-Schlaggar, C. N.; Wahlgren, D. R.; Liles, S.; Jones, J.A.; Ji, M., Hughes, S. C.;
48, 234-240
Levy, D. T., Cho, S., Kim, Y., Park, S., Suh, M., & Kam, S. (2010). SimSmoke Model
doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.166900
Locke, G. W., Shilkret, R., Everett, J. E., & Petry, N. M. (2015). Interpersonal Guilt and
doi:10.1080/08897077.2014.885482
Mantler, T., Irwin, J. D., Morrow, D., Hall, C., & Mandich, A. (2015). Assessing
doi:10.3109/16066359.2014.946410
Martínez-Sánchez, J. M., Ballbè, M., Fu, M., Martínez-Sánchez, J. C., Gottlieb, M.,
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114256
Measham, F., O’Brien, K., & Turnbull, G. (2016). “Skittles & Red Bull is my favourite
Doi:10.1080/09687637.2016.1178708
Musgrave, T., & Musgrave, W., (2000). An Empire of Plants: People and Plants That
Changed the World. New York, NY: Sterling Publishing Co., Inc.
Nicksic, N. E., Snell, L. M., Rudy, A. K., Cobb, C. O., & Barnes, A. J. (2017). Tobacco
Park, S. H., Lee, L., Shearston, J. A., & Weitzman, M. (2017). Patterns of electronic
cigarette use and level of psychological distress. Plos One, 12(3), e0173625.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173625
Pasquereau, A., Guignard, R., Andler, R., & Nguyen-Thanh, V. (2017). Electronic
Patel, D., Davis, K. C., Cox, S., Bradfield, B., King, B. A., Shafer, P., … Bunnell, R.
(2016). Reasons for current E-cigarette use among U.S. adults. Preventive
73
org.libproxy.csudh.edu/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.011
Pokhrel, P., Fagan, P., Kehl, L., & Herzog, T. A. (2015), Receptivity to E-cigarette
Pokhrel, P., Fagan, P., Little, M. A., Kawamoto, C. T., & Herzog, T. A. (2013). Smokers
e62.doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301453
Pokhrel, P., Herzog, T. A., Muranaka, N., & Fagan, P. (2015). Young adult e-cigarette
users’ reasons for liking and not liking e-cigarettes: A qualitative study.
Pokrel, P., & Herzog, T. A. (2015). Reasons for quitting cigarette smoking and electronic
cigarette use for cessation help. Psychology Of Addictive Behaviors, 29(1), 114-
121. doi:10.1037/adb0000025
Polosa, R., Caponnetto, P., Cibella, F., & Le-Houezec, J. (2015). Quit and smoking
3428-3438. doi:10.3390/ijerph120403428
74
Postolache, P., Dima Cozma, C., & Cojocaru, D. (2013). Assessment of Nicotine
Proctor, R. N. (2012). The history of the discovery of the cigarette-lung cancer link:
evidentiary traditions, corporate denial, global toll. Tobacco Control, 21(2), 87-
91. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050338
QuickStats: Cigarette Smoking Status Among Current Adult E-cigarette Users, by Age
http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6542a7
Rosa, J. D. R., Aloise-Young, P. A., & Henry, K. L. (2014). Using motives for smoking
Sa, J., Seo, D. d., Nelson, T. F., & Lohrmann, D. K. (2013). Cigarette Smoking Among
Saari, A. J., Kentala, J., & Mattila, K. J. (2015). Weaker Self- Esteem in Adolescence
doi:10.1155/2015/687541
75
Scholz, U., Stadler, G., Ochsner, S., Rackow, P., Hornung, R., & Knoll, N. (2016).
Examining the relationship between daily changes in support and smoking around
Seidenberg, A. B., Jo, C. L., & Ribisl, K. M. (2016). Differences in the design and sale of
doi:http://dx.doi.org.libproxy.csudh.edu/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-05237
Shang, C., Huang, J., Cheng, K-W., Li, Q., & Chaloupka, F. J. (2016). Global Evidence
Szabo, A., Ward, C., & Jose, P. E. (2016). Uprooting stress, coping, and anxiety: A
Trumbo, C. W., & Harper, R. (2013). Use and Perception of Electronic Cigarettes Among
doi:10.1080/07448481.2013.776052
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2014). The Health Consequences of
https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/50th-anniversary/pdfs/general-
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2016).E-Cigarette Use Among Youth
and Young Adults. A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences Of Smoking:
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and
Ussher, M., Brown, J., Rajamanoharan, A., & West, R. (2014). How Do Prompts for
Van Gucht, D., & Baeyens, F. (2016). Health professionals in Flanders perceive the
potential health risks of vaping as lower than those of smoking but do not
131-8. doi:10.1186/s12954-016-0111-4
Volesky, K. D., Maki, A., Scherf, C., Watson, L. M., Cassol, E., & Villeneuve, P. J.
harms and risks of e-cigarette use: survey results from a convenience sample in
77
Wang, T. W., Gentzke, A., Sharapova, S., Cullen, K. A., Ambrose, B. K., & Jamal, A.
(2018). Tobacco Product Use Among Middle and High School Students - United
States, 2011-2017. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 67(22), 629-
633. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6722a3
Tobacco Product Use With Future Cigarette Smoking Among Youth in the
org.libproxy.csudh.edu/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.4173
Wislon, A. J., Bonevski, B., Dunlop, A., Shakeshaft, A., Tzelepis, F., Walsberger, S., &
and client experiences and beliefs about addressing tobacco in addiction treatment
Wong, L. W., Mohamad Shakir, S., Alia, H., Aghamohammadi, N., & Hoe, V. (2016).
Reasons for Using Electronic Cigarettes and Intentions to Quit Among Electronic
Xu, Y., Guo, Y., Liu, K., Liu, Z., Wang, X., (2016). E-Cigarette Awareness, Use, and
Yousey, Y. Family attitudes about tobacco smoke exposure of young children at home.
Yuyan, S., Pierce, J. P., White, M., Vijayaraghavan, M., Compton, W., Conway, K., &
Messer, K. (2016). E-cigarette use and smoking cessation in the 2010/2011 TUS-
CPS longitudinal cohort. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 1-9. doi:10. 1186-s12889-
016-3770-x
Zhu, S., Sun, J. Y., Bonnevie, E., Cummins, S. E., Gamst, A., Yin, L., & Lee, M. (2014).
Four hundred and sixty brands of e-cigarettes and counting: implications for
doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051670
APPENDIX
SURVEY
80
Consent Form
You are being asked to participate in a research study. Before you give your consent to
volunteer, it is important that you read the following information and ask as many
questions as necessary.
Investigators: Carl Sneed, Ph.D., Bryant Portillo, B.A., Christopher Odudu, B.A.,
Logan Baughman III, B.A., Andrew Soto, B.A.
Purpose of the Study: This study is designed to gain a better understanding of electronic
cigarette users’ and non-users’ attitudes towards electronic cigarette use and seeks to
gain an overall understanding of how e-cigarette use influences an individual’s perceived
stress, self-esteem, hope, and emotional intelligence.
Description of the Study: As a participant, you will be asked to participate and complete
in an approximately 30-45 minute long survey (depending on your current usage of
cigarettes and electronic-cigarettes) that contains questions regarding your thoughts and
feelings towards electronic cigarettes and its use. To determine if you are eligible to
participate, you will be asked if you are 18 years of age or older. If your response
indicates that you are not eligible, the information obtained during screening will be
omitted from the study and shredded to protect your privacy.
Risks or Discomforts: Due to the personal nature of the questions that will be included in
the questionnaire, the questions asked, and/or the discussion could be emotionally
upsetting to you as a participant. If you begin to feel uncomfortable, you may discontinue
81
participation at any time, either temporarily or permanently, and it will not affect your
relationship with the researcher” or the school, or the job, etc. as appropriate
Benefits of the Study: By participating in this study, you may potentially, if eligible,
receive extra credit for your class. This is entirely dependent on your professor.
Additionally, discussion of these issues may help to clarify your own attitudes on this
topic. Lastly, results from this study will be used to expand on the literature and
knowledge of electronic cigarette use and their social acceptability.
Confidentiality: The records of this study will be kept private. Data will be stored in a
computer hard-drive and kept password-protected. Any report of this research that is
made available to the
public will not include your name or any other individual information by which
you could be identified.
Questions about the Study: If you have any questions about this study or your
rights as a participant, you may call the investigator Bryant Portillo at (310) 686-
2918 or bportillo3@toromail.csudh.edu or the professor Dr. Carl Sneed at
csneed@csudh.edu, or the Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human
Subjects at CSUDH, 310-243-3756.
82
1. Do you agree to the above terms? By clicking Yes, you consent that you are willing to
answer the questions in this survey.
Yes
No
Demographics
Female
Male
Arab
Black
Caucasian/ White
Hispanic/Latino
English
Spanish
Single
Married
Divorced
Widowed
Separated
Self-employed
A homemaker
A student
Retired
Unable to work
$10,000 to $19,999
$20,000 to $29,999
$30,000 to $39,999
84
$40,000 to $49,999
$50,000 to $59,999
$60,000 to $69,999
$70,000 to $79,999
$80,000 to $89,999
$90,000 to $99,999
$100,000 to $149,999
$150,000 or more
Some college
Vocational/technical school
Bachelor's degree
Master's degree
Doctoral degree
Professional degree
Master's program
Doctoral program
Instructions: Indicate the extent to which each question applies to you using the following
response choices available.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
* 13. When I am faced with obstacles, I remember times I faced similar obstacles and
overcame them.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
* 17. Some of the major events of my life have led me to re-evaluate what is important
and not important.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
87
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
* 19. Emotions are some of the things that make my life worth living.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
88
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
89
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
90
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
* 29. By looking at their facial expressions, I recognize the emotions people are
experiencing.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
92
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
* 37. When another person tells me about an important event in his or her life, I almost
feel as though I have experienced this event myself.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
93
Strongly Agree
* 38. When I feel a change in emotions, I tend to come up with new ideas.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
* 39. When I am faced with a challenge, I give up because I believe I will fail.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
* 40. I know what other people are feeling just by looking at them.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
* 41. I help other people feel better when they are down.
94
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
* 42. I use good moods to help myself keep trying in the face of obstacles.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
* 43. I can tell how people are feeling by listening to the tone of their voice.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
* 44. It is difficult for me to understand why people feel the way they do.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
95
Agree
Strongly Agree
The questions in this scale ask you about your feelings and thoughts during the last
month. In each case, you will be asked to indicate how often you felt or thought a certain
way based on the following response choices available.
* 45. In the last month, how often have you been upset because of something that
happened unexpectedly?
Never
Almost Never
Sometimes
Fairly Often
Very Often
* 46. In the last month, how often have you felt that you were unable to control the
important things in your life?
Never
Almost Never
Sometimes
Fairly Often
Very Often
* 47. In the last month, how often have you felt confident about your ability to
handle your personal problems?
Never
96
Almost Never
Sometimes
Fairly Often
Very Often
* 48. In the last month, how often have you felt that things were going your way?
Never
Almost Never
Sometimes
Fairly Often
Very Often
* 49. In the last month, how often have you found that you could not cope with all the
things that you had to do?
Never
Almost Never
Sometimes
Fairly Often
Very Often
* 50. In the last month, how often have you been able to control irritations in your life?
Never
Almost Never
Sometimes
97
Fairly Often
Very Often
* 51. In the last month, how often have you felt that you were on top of things?
Never
Almost Never
Sometimes
Fairly Often
Very Often
* 52. In the last month, how often have you been angered because of things that were
outside of your control?
Never
Almost Never
Sometimes
Fairly Often
Very Often
* 53. In the last month, how often have you felt difficulties were piling up so high
that you could not overcome them?
Never
Almost Never
Sometimes
Fairly Often
98
Very Often
Instructions: Below is a list of statements dealing with your general feelings about
yourself. Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with each statement.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
99
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
* 60. I feel that I'm a person of worth, at least on equal plane with others.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
100
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Read each item carefully. Please select the response that best describes how you think
about yourself right now for each statement.
* 64. If I should find myself in a jam, I could think of many ways to get out of it.
Definitely False
Mostly False
Somewhat False
Slightly False
Slightly True
Somewhat True
101
Mostly True
Definitely True
Definitely False
Mostly False
Somewhat False
Slightly False
Slightly True
Somewhat True
Mostly True
Definitely True
* 66. There are lots of ways around any problem that I am facing now.
Definitely False
Mostly False
Somewhat False
Slightly False
Slightly True
Somewhat True
Mostly True
Definitely True
102
Definitely False
Mostly False
Somewhat False
Slightly False
Slightly True
Somewhat True
Mostly True
Definitely True
Definitely False
Mostly False
Somewhat False
Slightly False
Slightly True
Somewhat True
Mostly True
Definitely True
* 69. At this time, I am meeting the goals that I have set for.
Definitely False
Mostly False
103
Somewhat False
Slightly False
Slightly True
Somewhat True
Mostly True
Definitely True
Below are a few images that illustrate what an electronic cigarette, vape mod, or vape pen
might look like.
104
105
For the following questions, you must choose at least one response from the available
choices for each question. Some questions may allow you to enter more than one
response from the choices available.
* 70. Before viewing the last page, had you heard of electronic cigarettes, also known as
"e-cigarettes" or "e-cigs"?
Yes, but I wasn't sure what they were or how they worked
No
Refuse to answer
* 71. Do you intend to use e-cigarettes or vape within the next 12 months?
Definitely not
Probably not
Unsure
106
Probably
Definitely
0-20%
21-40%
41-60%
61-80%
81-100%
Refuse to answer
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
For the next two questions, if this has never happened to you, imagine what you would do
in the situation.
* 74. If someone was using an e-cigarette or vaping in a non-smoking area of a public
place, how likely are you to make a face, a coughing noise, a loud comment, or some
other signal to get him or her to realize that it is bothering you?
Very Likely
Somewhat Likely
Somewhat Unlikely
107
Very Unlikely
* 75. How likely are you to approach that person and point out that they are in a non-
smoking area?
Very Likely
Somewhat Likely
Somewhat Unlikely
Very Unlikely
* 76. Does the vapor from e-cigarettes, vape mods, or vape pens, offend you in public?
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
* 77. Should there be a separate vaping section designated for e-cigarette users and
vapers?
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
Yes
108
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
* 79. Do you think that e-cigarettes, vape mods, or vape pens, are trying to appeal to
people less than 18 years of age?
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
* 80. In bars and cocktail lounges, do you think that using e-cigarettes or vaping should
be allowed in all areas, allowed in some areas, or not allowed at all?
Refuse to answer
* 81. Do you think that using e-cigarettes or vaping is a habit, an addiction, neither, or
both?
Habit
Addiction
Neither
Both
109
Don't know
Refuse to answer
* 82. Do you think that giving away free samples by e-cigarette companies should be...
Always allowed
Don't know
Refuse to answer
Always allowed
Don't know
Refuse to answer
* 84. How often are you in the company of someone or exposed to using e-cigarettes or
vaping?
Never
Seldom
Frequently
Refuse to answer
110
* 85. Which of the following characteristics do you consider indicate that certain e-
cigarettes are less harmful than tobacco cigarettes? (You may choose more than one
response)
Nicotine levels
Shape
Color
Refuse to answer
Yes
No
I don't remember
Refuse to answer
* 87. How often are you exposed to e-cigarette vapor at your place of work?
Ocassionally
Refuse to answer
* 88. Have people annoyed you by using an e-cigarette or vaping in front of you?
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
* 89. Do you feel bad for people who use e-cigarettes or vape?
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
* 90. Have people expressed to you why they use e-cigarettes or vape?
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
* 91. If so, do you feel bad for people after they tell you why they use e-cigarettes or
vape?
Yes
Indifferent
112
No
Refuse to answer
Beneficial
Harmful
Neither
Refuse to answer
* 93. For what particular reason do you not use e-cigarettes or vape? (You may choose
more than one response)
Cost reasons
I don't enjoy it
Other
Don't know
Refused
Not applicable
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
Refuse to answer
* 96. The people I spend most of my time with use e-cigarettes or vape.
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
114
Yes
Indifferent
No
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
* 99. The majority of the people I associate with, socially, use e-cigarettes or vape.
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
* 100. Do you intend to smoke tobacco products within the next 12 months?
Definitely not
Probably not
Unsure
Probably
Definitely
115
Refuse to answer
0-20%
21-40%
41-60%
61-80%
81-100%
Refuse to answer
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
For the next two questions, if this has never happened to you, imagine what you would do
in the situation.
* 103. If someone was smoking in a non-smoking area of a public place, how likely are
you to make a face, a coughing noise, a loud comment, or some other signal to get
him or her to realize that it is bothering you?
Very likely
Somewhat likely
116
Somewhat unlikely
Very unlikely
* 104. How likely are you to approach that person and point out that they are in a non-
smoking area?
Very likely
Somewhat likely
Somewhat unlikely
Very unlikely
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
* 106. Should there be a separate smoking section designated for cigarette smokers?
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
* 108. Do you think that tobacco cigarette companies are trying to appeal to people less
than 18 years of age?
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
* 109. In bars and cocktail lounges, do you think that smoking cigarettes should be
allowed in all areas, allowed in some areas, or not allowed at all?
Refuse to answer
* 110. Do you think that smoking cigarettes is a habit, an addiction, neither, or both?
Habit
Addiction
Neither
Both
118
Don't know
Refuse to answer
111. Do you think that giving away free samples by cigarette companies should be...
Always allowed
Don't know
Refuse to answer
Always allowed
Don't know
Refuse to answer
* 113. How often are you in the company of someone who smokes or exposed to cigarette
smoke?
Never
Seldom
Frequently
Refuse to answer
119
Yes
No
I don't remember
Refuse to answer
* 115. How often are you exposed to cigarette smoke at your place of work?
Occasionally
Refuse to answer
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
Yes
Indifferent
120
No
Refuse to answer
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
* 119. If so, do you feel bad for people after they tell you why they smoke?
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
* 120. For what particular reason(s) do you not smoke cigarettes? (You may choose
more than one response)
I don't enjoy it
Other
Don't know
Refused
Not applicable
Refuse to answer
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
Refuse to answer
* 123. The people I spend most of my time with smoke cigarettes.
122
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
Yes
Indifferent
No
Refuse to answer
* 127. The majority of the people I associate with, socially, smoke cigarettes.
Yes
123
No
Refuse to answer
* 128. Have you used an electronic cigarette, vape pen, vape mod, or vaped, even one or
two puffs, in the past 30 days?
Yes
No
Within 5 minutes
6-30 mintues
31-60 minutes
Refuse to answer
* 130. Do you find it difficult to refrain from using e-cigarettes or vaping in public
places? (E.g., church, library, etc.)
Yes
No
Refuse to answer
Yes
No
Refuse to answer
* 132. Do you use e-cigarettes or vape even if you are in bed sick most of the day?
124
Yes
No
Refuse to answer
* 133. Why do you use e-cigarettes or vape? (You may choose more than one response)
More affordable
Refuse to answer
* 134. Can you remember why you tired your first e-cigarette or vaped for the first time?
Refuse to answer
0-20%
21-40%
41-60%
61-80%
81-100%
Refuse to answer
* 136. If your best friend/partner uses e-cigarettes or vapes, how often does he or she use?
Never
Infrequently
Occasionally
Regular
Refuse to answer
* 137. When you first started using e-cigarettes or vaping, did you think it was common
for people your age to use e-cigarettes or vape as well?
126
Yes
No
Refuse to answer
* 138. When you first started using e-cigarettes or vaping, did you believe that you can
become addicted to it?
Yes
No
Refuse to answer
* 139. During the past 30 days, on how many days did you use e-cigarettes or vape?
1 or 2 days
3 to 5 days
6 to 9 days
10 to 19 days
20 to 29 days
All 30 days
Refuse to answer
140. When was the last time you used an e-cigarette or vaped? (Please choose one
response that best fits your situation)
Earlier today
127
Not during the past 7 days but sometime during the past 30 days
Refuse to answer
* 141. In the past 12 months, did you receive ads from an e-cigarette, vape mod or
vape pen company through... (You can choose more than one answer)
I did not receive ads from an e-cigarette, vape mod, or vape pen company
The mail
The Internet
Refuse to answer
* 142. When you go to a convenience store, supermarket, or gas station, how often
do you see ads or promotions for electronic cigarettes, vape mod, or vape pen
products?
Never
Rarely
Sometimes
Always
Refuse to answer
128
* 143. During the past 30 days, how often did you see an ad for e-cigarette, vape mod or
vape pen products that was outdoors on a billboard or could be seen from outside a
store?
Never
Rarely
Sometimes
Always
Refuse to answer
* 144. When you watch TV or go to the movies, how often do you see actors and
actresses using e-cigarette, vape mod, or vape pen products?
Never
Rarely
Sometimes
Always
Refuse to answer
* 145. During the past 12 months, how many times have you stopped using e-cigarettes
or vaping for one day or longer because you were trying to quit using?
I did not try to quit using e-cigarettes or vaping during the past 12 months
1 time
129
2 times
3 to 5 times
6 to 9 times
10 or more times
Refuse to answer
* 146. Are you thinking about quitting the use of all e-cigarettes and vaping?
Refuse to answer
* 147. Inside your home (not counting decks, garages or porches) is e-cigarette or
vaping...
Always allowed
Never allowed
Refuse to answer
* 148. In the vehicles that you and family members who live with you own or lease, use
of e-cigarettes and vaping is...
Always allowed
Sometimes allowed
130
Never allowed
Refuse to answer
* 149. Do you think that breathing other peoples' e-cigarette vapor is...
Refuse to answer
* 150. Have you ever used e-cigarettes or vaped to quit smoking tobacco cigarettes?
Yes, I have
No, I haven't
Refuse to answer
* 151. If you use e-cigarettes or vape, do you use less than when you were smoking
tobacco?
Refuse to answer
* 152. Do you use or have you ever used an e-cigarette that contains nicotine?
Yes
No
131
Refuse to answer
* 153. If you do or have used the cartridges containing nicotine, what was the amount of
nicotine you use or used?
.03
.06
.12
.18
Refuse to answer
* 154. Why did you switch from tobacco cigarettes to e-cigarettes or vaping?
Health reasons
Refuse to answer
* 155. Did you switch to using your current e-cigarette, vape mod, or vape pen because it
gives you a more satisfying "hit" than the previous tobacco cigarettes you tried?
Yes
No
Don't know
132
Refuse to answer
Very important
Important
Not important
Refuse to answer
* 157. When you started using e-cigarettes or vaping, was it your intention to quit
smoking?
Yes
No
Refuse to answer
* 158. Do you now use e-cigarettes or vape every day, some days, or not at all?
Every day
Some days
Not at all
Don't know
Refuse to answer
*
* 159. During the past 30 days, on how many days did you use e-cigarettes or vape?
0 days
1 or 2 days
133
3 to 5 days
6 to 9 days
10 to 19 days
20 to 29 days
All 30 days
Refuse to answer
* 160. How true is this statement for you? "I feel restless and irritable when I don't use e-
cigarettes or vape for a while."
Sometimes true
Often true
Always true
Refuse to answer
* 161. Are you seriously thinking about quitting the use of e-cigarettes or vaping?
Refuse to answer
134
* 162. If you decided to quit using e-cigarettes or vaping for good, how likely is it that
you would succeed?
Very likely
Somewhat likely
Somewhat unlikely
Very unlikely
Refuse to answer
*
* 163. During the past 12 months, how many times have you stopped using e-cigarettes or
vaping for one day or longer because you were trying to quit using e-cigarettes and
vaping for good?
I did not try to quit using e-cigarettes or vaping during the 12 past months
1 time
2 times
3 to 5 times
6 to 9 times
10 or more times
Refuse to answer
* 164. When you last tried to quit for good, how long did you stay off e-cigarettes and
vaping?
1 to 7 days
135
1 year or more
Refuse to answer
* 165. How old were you when you first tried an e-cigarette or vaped, even one or two
puffs?
* 166. During the past 30 days, on the days you used e-cigarettes or vaped, how many
cigarettes did you smoke per day?
Refuse to answer
167. Among the following, what were the most significant elements that made you start
using e-cigarettes, vape mods, or vape pens?
Combustion reasons
Other (spontaneous)
Don't know
Refuse to answer
Below are a series of statements about e-cigarettes and vaping. Please rate your level of
agreement for each question.
* 168. For the most part, I enjoy the taste of e-cigarettes and vaping.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 169. When I am in a good mood, using e-cigarettes or vaping makes it even better.
Neutral
137
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 174. The most that I can go in between e-cigarettes and vaping is a couple of hours.
Neutral
139
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 175. Within seconds after using an e-cigarette or vaping, I start to feel better.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 176. There aren't many things that can take the place of e-cigarettes or vaping in my
life.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 177. When I have to deal with stressful situations, I will use an e-cigarette and/or vape.
140
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 179. At times I feel that using e-cigarettes or vaping has too much control in my life.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
141
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 182. When I want to reward myself, the fastest way to do so is with an e-cigarette or
through vaping.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 183. The urge to use e-cigarettes or vape grows increasingly stronger as time goes by.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 184. I will continue to use e-cigarettes or vape even at the expense of my other interests
and hobbies.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
143
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 186. When I need a lift, nothing can get it done like an e-cigarette or vaping can.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 187. Other e-cigarette users and "vapers" would consider me a heavy e-cigarette user or
"vaper".
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 188. It would take a pretty serious medical problem to make me quit using e-cigarettes
or stop vaping.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 189. When something prevents me from using e-cigarettes or vaping for hours, the
cravings I have for e-cigarettes or vaping becomes nearly intolerable.
Not True of Me At All
Neutral
145
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 190. When I inhale e-cigarette vapor into my mouth, I enjoy the way it makes me feel.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 191. When I wake up in the morning, I will use an e-cigarette or vape within about 30
minutes.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 192. I reach for an e-cigarette, a vape mod, or a vape pen, when I feel irritable.
146
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
147
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 196. No matter what the mood, using e-cigarettes or vaping makes it that much better.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 197. Feelings of irritability can cause me to reach for an e-cigarette, vape mod, or vape
for relief.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 198. There are few feelings that can compare to a long, slow exhalation from an e-
cigarette puff or from vaping.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 199. For a quick pick me up, using an e-cigarette or vaping does the job.
Neutral
149
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 200. Have you a smoked a cigarette, even one or two puffs, in the past 30 days?
Yes
No
* 201. How soon after waking up do you smoke your first cigarette?
Within 5 minutes
6-30 minutes
31-60 minutes
Refuse to answer
* 202. Do you find it difficult to refrain from smoking in places where it is forbidden?
(E.g., church, library, etc.)
Yes
No
Refuse to answer
* 203. Do you smoke more frequently in the morning, as opposed to the afternoon or
evening?
Yes
No
Refuse to answer
* 204. Do you smoke even if you are sick in bed sick most of the day?
150
Yes
No
Refuse to answer
* 205. Do you currently smoke every day, some days, or not at all?
Every day
Some days
Not at all
No answer
Refuse to answer
10 cigarettes or less
11-20
21-30
More than 30
Refuse to answer
* 207. About how many cigarettes have you smoked in your entire life? (An approximate
guess)
10 cigarettes or less
Refuse to answer
151
* 208. At any time in your life, have you smoked more than 1 cigarette per day for 30
days straight?
Yes
No
Refuse to answer
* 209. During the past 30 days, on how many days did you smoke?
Some days
No days
Refuse to answer
* 210. When you first started smoking, did you believe that smoking cigarettes could be
harmful to your health?
Yes
No
Refuse to answer
I am a daily smoker
I am an infrequent smoker
I am an occasional smoker
Refuse to answer
* 212. If your partner/best friend is a smoker, how often does he or she smoke?
Never
Infrequently
Occasionally
Regularly
Refuse to answer
* 213. How old were you when you tried your first cigarette, even a single puff?
8 or 9 years old
10 or 11 years old
12 or 13 years old
14 or 15 years old
16 or 17 years old
Refuse to answer
Before age 10
Refuse to answer
Any other
Refuse to answer
* 216. Do you intend to use e-cigarettes or vape within the next 12 months?
Definitely not
Probably not
Unsure
Probably
Definitely
Refuse to answer
None
A few
Most
All
154
Refuse to answer
* 218. When you first started smoking, did you believe that you could become addicted to
cigarettes?
Yes
No
Refuse to answer
* 219. While you were growing up, how many of your parents/guardians smoked?
None
One
Refuse to answer
* 220. While you were growing up, what was your oldest age when at least one of your
parents/guardias smoked?
Refuse to answer
* 221. While you were growing up, did any of your siblings who lived with you smoke?
Yes
No
I don't have any siblings who lived with me while I was growing up
Refuse to answer
* 222. While you were growing up, did any of your parents/guardians smoke inside your
home?
Yes
No
Refuse to answer
* 223. While you were growing up, did your parents/guardians allow visitors and guests
to smoke inside your home?
Yes
No
Refuse to answer
* 224. While you were growing up, did your parents/guardians allow you to smoke inside
your home?
Yes
156
No
Refuse to answer
7 days
30 days
6 months
1 year
Refuse to answer
*
*
* 226. During the past 12 months, how many times have you stopped smoking for
one day or longer because you were trying to quit smoking for good?
1 time
2 times
3 to 5 times
6 to 9 times
10 or more times
Refuse to answer
157
* 227. When you last tried to quit, how long did you stay off cigarettes?
1 to 7 days
1 year or more
Refuse to answer
Refuse to answer
*
* 229. In the past 12 months, did you do any of the following to help you quit smoking?
(You can choose more than one response)
Refuse to answer
* 230. How old were you when you smoked your first cigarette?
* 231. During the past 30 days, on how many days did you smoke?
0 days
1 or 2 days
3 to 5 days
6 to 9 days
10 to 19 days
20 to 29 days
All 30 days
Refuse to answer
* 232. During the past 30 days, on the days you smoked, how many cigarettes did you
smoke per day?
159
Refuse to answer
Below are a series of statements about smoking. Please rate your level of agreement for
each question.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 235. The activity of smoking carries a considerable amount of control over my life.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
161
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 238. When I wake up, most of the time, I want to smoke a cigarette.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 239. I can't think of many things that satisfy me the way that cigarettes do.
Neutral
162
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 244. There aren't many things that can take the place of cigarettes in my life.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
164
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 248. At times, I feel that smoking has too much control in my life.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
166
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
168
* 255. The urge to smoke grows increasingly stronger as time passes by.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 256. I will continue to smoke at the expense of my other interests and hobbies.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 259. When I need a lift, nothing can get it done like smoking a cigarette can.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 261. It would take a pretty serious medical problem to make me quit smoking.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 262. When something prevents me from smoking for hours, the cravings I have for
a cigarette becomes nearly intolerable.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 263. The majority of the people I associate with are social smokers.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 264. When I inhale smoke into my mouth, I enjoy the way it makes me feel.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 265. When I wake up in the morning, I will smoke within about 30 minutes.
172
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
173
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 270. No matter what the mood, smoking makes it that much better.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 272. There are few feelings that can compare to a long, slow exhalation from a cigarette
puff.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
175
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
* 273. For a quick pick me up, smoking a cigarette does the job.
Neutral
Slightly True of Me
Mostly True of Me
Extremely True of Me
176
You were asked to complete this survey to get extra credit in your SBS 318 class at
California State University, Dominguez Hills. PLEASE PUT YOUR LAST NAME
and FIRST NAME in the boxes below. Please make sure to include your given name
and not nicknames.
274. PLEASE PUT YOUR LAST NAME IN THE TOP BOX AND YOUR FIRST
NAME IN THE BOTTOM BOX SO THAT YOU CAN GET CREDIT FOR THIS
ASSIGNMENT. PLEASE PUT YOUR FULL NAME AND DON'T USE
NICKNAME, AS THAT MAY MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO FIGURE OUT WHO
SHOULD GET THE EXTRA CREDIT.