Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment
Content
objective
Distinction between private and the public sectors AO2
The main features of the following types of organizations:
• Sole traders
• Partnerships AO3
• Privately held companies
• Publicly held companies
The main features of the following types of for-profit social
enterprises:
• Private sector for-profit social enterprises AO3
• Public sector for-profit social enterprises
• Cooperatives
Unit content (continued)
Assessment
Content
objective
The main features of the following types of non-profit
social enterprises: AO3
• Non-governmental organizations (NGOs)
Private vs. public sectors
• creating employment
• helping the development
and growth of the economy
• providing a wide variety of
goods and services
https://youtu.be/ksdAC8CYF7A
Sole traders: Advantages
• It is the quickest and easiest type of business to set up. Sole traders can avoid complicated and
costly set-up procedures.
• Sole traders are likely to be highly motivated as the owners have a sense of achievement from
running their own business and can keep all of the profits made.
• The sole trader (owner) has complete control without having to consult with or be accountable to
others.
• Hence, decision-making is also swift as the owner does not have to consult anyone else and seek
their permission to execute a decision.
• The sole trader enjoys privacy as it only needs to publish its financial accounts to the tax authorities
(rather than to the general public like a publicly held company). For example, sole traders in Hong
Kong only need to submit paperwork for the Inland Revenue if their annual sales revenue exceed
HK$2m (around US$260,000). Similarly, sole proprietors in the UK are able to complete their own
business tax returns without the formal requirement of final accounts being externally audited.
• The owner can benefit from tax advantages. As a small business, many sole traders work from
home, so can claim tax concessions by using part of their home for business purposes.
Sole traders: Disadvantages
• The finance to set up and run the business is generally provided by the owner (from personal savings) as s/he cannot
easily access external sources of finance.
• The sole trader accepts all the risks of owning and running their own business, including any losses made or even the
collapse of the organization.
• The workload for a sole trader can be extremely high. There is no one else to share ideas or to ask questions, so all
pressures, burdens and responsibilities fall on the owner. This means the sole trader often has to work very long hours.
• Legally, a sole trader is treated as the same legal entity as the business, i.e. it is an unincorporated business. This
means the sole trader has unlimited liability so is responsible for any debt owed to other individuals or organizations,
even if this requires the owner to pay the debts from their personal belongings and assets.
• There is a lack of continuity in the operations of the business if the owner is unwell, wishes to take a holiday or wants
to retire. The latter is a main reason why many sole trader businesses struggle to continue.
• As sole proprietorships are usually small businesses (such as a small convenience store owner), they are unlikely to be
able to gain any economies of scale, perhaps because they cannot buy their materials or stocks (inventory) in bulk.
This means sole traders pay more for their goods, their prices charged to customers also tend to be higher. By
contrast, larger business (such as supermarket chains) gain these cost-saving benefits, so are able to charge much
lower prices due to their ability to exploit economies of scale.
• Since access to external finance is difficult for most sold traders (because they represent a high degree of risk),
expansion of the business is difficult.
Partnerships
https://youtu.be/s8vXZTB3618
Partnerships: Advantages
• Partnerships can raise far more finance than sole traders, especially as there can be up to 20 partners
(subject to the laws in different countries) in the business. Silent partners (also known as sleeping
partners) can provide additional capital without having any role in the actual running of the business.
• Having partners enables the firm to benefit from having more ideas and different skills and expertise.
• Unlike a sole trader, partners can share the burden of their workload and responsibilities.
• Hence, unlike a sole trader, partnerships benefit from continuity as the partnership can remain in
operation if a partner is unwell or wants to go on a family vacation.
• Partnerships can benefit from specialization and the division of labour. For example, a law firm might
have partners who specialize in different specialisms, such as criminal law, civil law, business law and tax
law.
• As with sole traders, business affairs of a partnership are kept confidential, so only the tax authorities
need to know about the financial position of the partnership.
Partnerships: Disadvantages
• As the business has more than one owner, this can easily lead to disagreements and conflict
between the owners, which can seriously damage the running of the partnership.
• Decision making is slower than with sole traders because there are more owners involved. This
can also lead to disagreements and conflicts between the owners
• Unlike with a sole trade, the profits made by a partnership must be shared between all the
owners.
• In general, partners have unlimited liability so are liable for any debts, fines, penalties or law
suits against the business, even if this these were caused by another partner in the firm.
However, sleeping partners are exempt from unlimited liability.
• Compared to limited liability companies, access to finance is restricted to the finances available
from the different partners in the firm. There is no maximum number of owners in limited
liability companies, so they can raise finance through their shareholders.
• There is no continuity if a partner decides to leave the firm or if one of the partners die. This is
because such cases would void the Deed of Partnership. There would be a time delay in setting
up a new partnership agreement.
Limited liability companies
• There is better control of a privately rather than publicly held company, as shares in a privately
held company cannot be bought or sold without the agreement of existing shareholders.
• Significantly more finance can be raised compared with a sole trader (one owner) or a partnership
(up to 20 owners).
• Privately held companies have greater privacy compared to publicly held companies; the latter
must make their final accounts available to the general public.
• Shareholders have limited liability, so cannot lose more than what they invest in the company.
Owners are protected against any misconduct or misjudgments of those who run the company.
• Unlike a sole trader or partnership, a privately held company can enjoy continuity in the event of
the death of a major shareholder.
Privately held companies
Disadvantages
• Privately held companies can only sell their shares to family, friends, and employees, with
the approval of the majority of existing shareholders. This can make it difficult to buy and
sell shares in the company.
• They are more expensive to operate than a sole trader or partnership. For example, there
are higher legal fees and auditing fees (for checking and approving of the financial
accounts).
• A privately held company can become a target for a takeover by a larger company which
purchases a majority stake, although other owners have to agree to the sale of the
company.
Publicly held companies
• Additional finance can be raised through a share issue (the process of subsequently selling more
shares in a company). Hence, it is easier for publicly held companies to obtain finance from a stock
exchange to fund its growth and evolution by selling additional share capital. In 2010, Brazil’s state
oil company Petrobras raised $70 billion, in the world’s largest share issue.
• It is also easier for large publicly held companies to borrow money from bank loans and mortgages,
due to their lower level of risk for financial lenders.
• As with privately held companies, the shareholders of publicly held companies enjoy limited
liability.
• Large publicly held companies get to enjoy the benefits of operating on a large scale, such as
opportunities to exploit economies of scale, market share, and market power.
• As with privately held companies, publicly held companies enjoy continuity even if a principal or
major shareholder leaves the organization or passes away.
Publicly held companies
Disadvantages
• There is a lack of privacy because the general public have access to the financial
accounts of publicly held companies.
• Publicly held companies are the most administratively difficult and expensive form of
commercial for-profit business to set up and run. For example, there are high costs of
complying with the rules and regulations of the stock market.
• As the general public can buy and sell share freely, there is always a potential threat
that a rival company will make a takeover bid.
• Large companies can suffer from diseconomies of scale. Being too large can cause
inefficiencies in the company, and hence higher average costs of production.
Definition of Social Enterprise: Discrepancies
• There are three main types of for-profit social enterprises covered in the IB
Business Management syllabus:
NOTE: The IB acknowledges that the legal definition of a social enterprise varies between
countries.
For-profit social
enterprises
* Traditional businesses may allocate some funds to corporate social responsibilities (CSR), it is not their
main or most important focus. Instead, the main drivers for such businesses is profit, growth, and
protecting shareholder value. A growing number of traditional businesses are reporting on the triple
bottom line to as part of their CSR and sustainability goals.
Private Sector for-profit
social enterprises
https://youtu.be/_PuTjiMNIWg
PUBLIC SECTOR for-profit
social enterprises
• 98 cooperatives, 8 foundations, 1
mutual and 7 international
delegations, distributed in four areas:
finance, industry, distribution and
knowledge.
MONDRAGON Corporation
Unió Nuts
https://youtu.be/_0_6go0vOjE
La Fageda
• La Fageda is a consumer
cooperative originally
created in 1982 as a
worker cooperative. It
manages training, leisure
and sports activities, and
also services for all the
people in the organization,
such as the internal store
and the kitchen-dining
room.
https://youtu.be/QvxKSdgbNaM
Cooperatives
https://youtu.be/f807DajFuMA
Types of Cooperatives
• Similarly, employees and managers of cooperatives may lack the financial motivation
to excel, due to the absence of a profit motive.
• Most cooperatives have very limited sources of finance as their capital depends on the
amount contributed by their members.
• Most cooperatives are unable to hire a range of specialist managers to run the
business, due to the lack of financial rewards and sources of finance to remunerate
their senior staff. This can limit the success of the cooperative.
• A democratic culture is not always effective. Despite some members having more to
contribute to the organization and greater responsibilities, they only get one vote as
do all other members. This can be somewhat inefficient and perceived as unfair for
some members.
Non-governmental
organizations (NGOS)
• Non-profit social enterprises exist for the benefit of local communities and societies.
Examples include fundraising events and donations to meet social aims of a community.
• Non-profit organizations, including non-profit social enterprises, are exempt from paying
corporate and profits taxes.
• Many NPOs also qualify for government assistance in the form of grants and/or subsidies,
thereby reducing their costs of production.
• There can be a positive impact on employees and donors who feel that the non-profit
enterprise is pursuing a socially meaningful ambition.
Non-governmental
organizations (NGOS)
Disadvantages of non-profit social enterprises (apply to both NGOs and charities):
• There are strict guidelines and restrictions that non-profit social enterprises must follow;
not all trading activities are permitted. This is to ensure the general public is protected
against fraudulent activities by dishonest charities or non-governmental organizations.
• NPOs depend on the goodwill of the general public and donors to fund their operations. As
a result, business survival is often difficult for many smaller, less-known non-profit social
enterprises.
• In many cases, there is a lack of financial and cost control because, unlike in a for-profit
organization, managers at NPOs are not expected to earn a profit for their owners or
shareholders.
• As a non-profit organization, the wages and remuneration of workers are often lower than
in commercial, for-profit organizations. Whilst it might be socially acceptable that the
managers at a bank or private law firm is paid an annual bonus, gets to travel on business
class and is offered a company car, the equivalent benefits for a person working for a
charity might be deemed to be rather unethical.
Non-governmental
organizations (NGOS)
• Amnesty International
• Doctors Without Borders
• The International Organization for Standardization
(ISO)
• Oxfam
• Wikimedia Foundation
• World Vision International
• World Wildlife Fund
Doctors Without Bordres
Humanitarian Action
https://youtu.be/YC2HH19Pznc
Doctors Without Bordres
Humanitarian Action
https://youtu.be/8DFemg94ufU
Doctors Without Bordres
Humanitarian Action
https://youtu.be/Qgl96whdKug
Oxfam Intermón
https://youtu.be/X9_6e3GH5-U
Summary: Where do
businesses stand?
Source: Kognity
Activity
VIDEO. SEK Group: We are B Corp
Can we really ‘know’ if for-profit
organizations do not care about
society as much as non-profit
social enterprises?
CASE ANALYSIS:
B CORP CERTIFICATION