0% found this document useful (0 votes)
139 views1 page

Student Presentation Evaluation Criteria

The document provides marking criteria for written and oral presentations in English III at Universidad Nacional de Moreno. For written assignments, students will be evaluated on the structure and organization of their work, inclusion of main ideas from source texts, and rephrasing skills. For oral presentations, students will be assessed on delivery, coherence, use of visual aids, comprehensiveness of content, research, English proficiency, and ability to answer questions knowledgeably. The final mark will reflect performance across these criteria.

Uploaded by

unrandom615
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
139 views1 page

Student Presentation Evaluation Criteria

The document provides marking criteria for written and oral presentations in English III at Universidad Nacional de Moreno. For written assignments, students will be evaluated on the structure and organization of their work, inclusion of main ideas from source texts, and rephrasing skills. For oral presentations, students will be assessed on delivery, coherence, use of visual aids, comprehensiveness of content, research, English proficiency, and ability to answer questions knowledgeably. The final mark will reflect performance across these criteria.

Uploaded by

unrandom615
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Universidad Nacional de Moreno Licenciatura en Gestión Ambiental- Licenciatura en Biotecnología

Departamento Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnologías Inglés III


Prof: María Florencia Garabito
WRITTEN AND ORAL PRESENTATION MARKING CRITERIA
Group:
Student:
Item NOT BELOW SATISFACTORY GOOD (7) VERY GOOD EXCELLENT Comments Grade
WELL AVERAGE (6) (8-9) (10)
ACHIEVED (4-5)
(1-3)
Written assignment Structure: Logically organised
Content: presence of main ideas
Rephrasing of the text

Coherence: grammar and


reference
Delivery
Clearly presented
Organised and easy to follow
Engaged with the audience
Obvious enthusiasm for topic
Oral presentation Visual aids
Clear and readable slides
Visually appealing slides
Suitable use of
figures/data/diagrams
Content
Comprehensive
Well-researcheduse of material
Use of English. Expression of key
concepts and phrases. Fluency
and pronunciation
Answers to questions
Thoughtful
Responsive
Drew on knowledge of topic
beyond presentation

Final mark:

You might also like