You are on page 1of 1

Art Inquiry. Recherches sur les arts 2022, vol.

XXIV
255
ISSN 1641-9278 / e - ISSN 2451-0327 / https://doi.org/10.26485/AI/2022/24/15

Cezary Wąs
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5163-9248
Institute of Art History
University of Wroclaw
cezary.was@uwr.edu.pl

DISCONTINUITY IN THE DEVELOPMENT


OF MODERN CITIES IN REM KOOLHAAS' THEORIES

Abstract: Cities played a major role in human civilization, but there have been major changes
in their forms. Throughout their long history, they have exhibited characteristics that contradict
each other. Historians, noticing the differences in the properties of cities, pointed to their many
types. The decisive division assumed that "oriental" cities are ruled by autocratic regimes, while
"western" cities are liberal and democratic. This kind of division was often questioned, especially
because it seemed that liberal-democratic systems had finally dominated world politics in the
late 20th century. The turn of the 21st century showed that such predictions were not correct.
Rem Koolhaas' theory of Generic Cities demonstrates that there has been an unexpected change
and that city forms in which Western culture values are irrelevant are now gaining importance.

Keywords: architectural theories, contemporary town planning, Rem Koolhaas, generic city

Initial considerations

A long history of cities in the world culture may lead one to believe that
there is continuity in their development. However, such an assumption raises
doubts. This is because the city is a reality that cannot be defined based on
a closed and unambiguous group of distinguishing features. The diversity of
cities, both ancient and modern ones, makes it impossible to create a strict defi-
nition. Examples can illustrate this insurmountable difficulty. If a large number
of inhabitants were included among the basic features of a city, then the history
of cities would make us notice that some densely populated human settlements

You might also like