Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TRODUCTION
ENGINEERING ETHICS
All heople in thiS Worid
Tace
dilemmas every
life, to take decisios. Dilemma
fesscianal day, either in
ros more in personal life
importantiy due to morality deCision-making
Or or
Definition of'Ethics
world Ethicos' which ich means
derived from the Greek
'Ethics' is
The word "Character and custom
of a people',Tho .
of 'acting' or Words
Customary way
used interchangeably, although they havoclbtle
Ethics and 'Morality are often
'Ethics' refer to moral practices
in the profestine.
differences. Broadly speaking
refers to practices in day- to day life. Ethir
normal -
wr.t.
people this world. Therefore we
in can
dy o
dy ot
various disciplines, although we concentrate more on the stu
Engineering Ethics' in the subsequent
(1) Professional Ethics: chapters. eirroles
211
2) Personal
nalEthics: is one's own ethical
commitments when dealing
Dersonal eth
else. Personal ethics is strongly influenced
by early home or
with everyone
and often modified by later personal reflections religious training
o c S Ethics: refer to the moral
practices
ther words, Business Ethics attempts toconcerned with runninga business.
apply general moral principles to
huiginess activities in order to resolve or clarify, the moral
arise in business.
issues which typically
l Engineering Ethics: is the study of the decisions
policies, and values that are
normally desirable in engineering practice and research. In other words
Fneineering Ethics consists of the responsibilities and rights that ought to
be endorsed by those engaged in engineering, and also of desirable
ideals and personal commitments of all engineers. Engineering Ethics is
nothing but widely accepted codes and standards of conduct by engineering
organizations.
ash of Ethics
Although Ethics are practiced in different domains, it is the same man who
clash of his personal
might appear in several of them. And very often there is a
Clashes
beliefs with that of professional duties or with that of business practices.
Man has been
like these are inevitable and certainly puts people in difficulties.
clashes but eventually some decision has to be
eternally perturbed by such
taken and continued with. This could be
after all kinds of debates, discussions
did after being convinced by Sri
and deliberations. Atleast that is what Arjuna
and violence, in Mahabharatha.
Krishna about the inevitability of war
mentioned
professional life when ethics clash, are
ome examples of modern day
below from
immense pressure
control dept. is under
An tngineer in the Quality engineering components
which
to okay a batch of
production & marketing dept. that
Marketing Manager argues
standards. The
ae
Talling below manufacturing The Production Manager
assures
incur huge
losses.
n deadlines would contribute to the
rejection of
Omeeting would not
in question do?
tha the components should the QC Engineer
a of. What
that they are part in
whateverpproducts
dtever
near by lake.
Hazardous
substances
community?
Two partners start a business. Business is doing well and there is enouah.
But one partner wants to avoid paying taxes to the maximum extent pocek
but the other partner is against evading too much. The first partner arguecth
the government does not do much for people and public money only make
politicians rich. The other partner says that it iS the primary duty of people to
pay taxes first and then talk about benefits. Whom would you support?
4 The principal of an engineering college finds out that the management is doing
unethical practices w.r.t admissions in the college. The Principal knows that he
is legaly responsible for all the admissions. What should he do?
5 A software engineer is in the midst of an important assignment for his
company. He is offered a higher salary and promotion by a rival company
which insists that he join them immediately. The new company says that it
will take care of any penalties or bond requirements with the previous
company. What do you think he should do? Should he abandon this key
project which needs his presence badly and quit the company which gave him
a job as a fresh graduate?
SCOPE AND AIMS OF ENGINEERING ETHICS
The scope of the study of Engineering Ethics can be understood through tne
following topics.
A. Common Themes of Engineering Ethics
There are seven common themes which recur in the study of Ethics as Jpp
vaiues -
Embedded- Engineering,
Moral
2
moral values are embedded in engineering projects they are going
0
chieve more than economic success a long-lasting public-backed
halesome success. Some ethics which can enhance the excellence of engineering
projects a r e :
ilShare profits with employees who are eventually responsible for success
(infosys grew to be one of the biggest IT Companies in the world because of
N. R. N's profit-sharing policies)
liv) Combine technological progress with commitment to the public good.
(v Most work cultures trickle down from the top. Management should strive
to demonstrate by personal examples the value of moral standards and
ethical practices.
3. Personal Commitment and Meaning
make them. The people
Engineering is all about products and the people who
include engineers who are at the forefront of relationships with customers,
colleagues, management, R& D, employers, and the general public. The personal
with
Commitments of individual engineers need to be aimed at and integrated
their individual
these shared responsibilities. In addition, if engineers are aware of
Contribution to the overall successsof projects,
their commitment would
increase.
Promote
. responsible conduct and prevent wrong-doing
for organizations
Since 'Preven tion is always better than cure, it is important
rather than punish them
o promote responsible conduct among its employees
Or any wrong-doing. Strong ethic culture should prevail in organizations
for
Ethics
theft, bribery, incompetence etc., Conflicting
prevent fraud, humane
5Enerate dilemmas Personal ethics,
professional ethics, moralities,
business
each other and come in the way of
onsiderations often clash with advice
personal reflection, work environment,
ormance. Company policies, due to
resolve dilemmas which aregenerated
bye Xperienced people, etc., help
Clash of ethics.
cONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND PROFESSIONAL ETHic
214 ICS
mankind
1 Electrification 11. Nuclear technologies
They are
1. Normative Inquiries
These inquiries help individuals and groups overcome clash of ethicS u the
discharge ot their duties In other words, normative inquiries are med at
NGINEERINGE T H I C s 215
deatifying and justifying the morally desirable norms or standards that guide
individuals or groups in their work places. Some examples of normative inquiries
are
are engineers who work public projects, obliged to public
()To what extent, on
safety?
it ever, should engineers announce to the public the dangerous
(i) When,
hazardous to publicC?
practices employed by their management which are
values do
When designing and executing Metro Rail for example, whose
(ii)
those of management,
engineers consider primary in making judgements
-
combination
R&D, politicians, tax payers, affected people, workers,
or some
of these?
obligation?
(iv What moral rights can engineers exercise in fulfilling professional
and answers.
Answering the above questions may lead to further questions
continue with life.
end of the day and
But people have to take decisions at the
2. Conceptual Inquiries
issues in
aimed at clarifying broad concepts, principles and
These inquiries are
of conceptual inquiries are:
engineering ethics. Some examples
and how is it related to risk'?
i)What does safety m e a n
Do they exist?
What roles do sincerity and Honesty play in workplaces?
(i)
Does it have boundaries?
ii) What is professionalism?
constitutes a bribe?
Are gifts a form of bribe?
(IV) What
3. Factual Inquiries
aimed at finding facts and figures which may help in resolving
These inquiries are
also called descriptive inquiries, seek to
uncover
RESPONsIBILITY OF ENGINEERS
T R O D U C T I O O N
where
Responsibility is one
and Moral. Legal
Responsibility can be both Legal Moral responsibility
is one where
irresponsible.
the law indicts a man of being own c o u r s e in deciding
the
The law will take its
à man in not legally
trapped. mistakes whereas
moral
for their
responsible for
Tate of people iegally penalized. In regard to responsibility
be
responsibilities for
failure cannot as:
further distinguish
morality, we
in both law and
Causing harm,
harm
intentionally causing
Responsibility for harm are both legally and morall
cause
and deliberately
Feople who knowing!y kinds.
criminals of all
esponsible for it e.g.,
causing harm
Negligently
esponsibility for but failing to
exercise 'due care',
without knowing are.
harm responsible but morally
n s means causing legally
a r e not responsible
cases, people a r e morally
Evertheless. In such
nev with a knife, you
child to play
For example if youallow a knife.
caused by the
Or any injury,
220 cONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND PROFESSIONAL ETHIcs
MEANINGS OF RESPONSIBILITY
(1) Obligations
Obligations are actions that one is expected to carry out without being demanded
for. Meeting obligation is nothing but showing your responsibility. Some
obligations are expected to be met by all people i.e. being honest, fair and decent.
Most obligations are based on different roles that people take such as
parents,
colleagues, teachers, engineers, doctors etc., Every role has its own obligations
specific to its functions.
(2) Accountable
riends, some neighbours, close relatives, social workers show such attitudes.
9 "Good Works" Attitude of Responsibility
his is the
highest degree of responsibility shown rarely by people. People having
G00d works" attitude go above and beyond the call of
duty in executing
esponsibilities. In fact they go beyond their normal obligation and duties. They
dke on such responsibilities and do such Work that no one expected them to
. If
they did not do these things, no one would fault them.
rents, extremely close friends, true. Saints and elevated souls may have such
attitude.
cONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
222
(1) Self-interest
Most engineers are first human beings, then professionals. During their discharge
of duties self-interest may oppose company interests or-group interests. This
may prompt professionals to act contrary to the interests of the company,
contrary to even the expectations of the companions.
ERING ETHICS
ENGINE
(4) lgnorance
information.
Ignoranc
with full knowledee and
is better executed 1s e s p e t d y
Responsibility action. This
information is an obvious barrier to responsible better
of vital duties better with
who c a n discharge their
true
with profesionals
information
be due to:
gnorance may
s o u r c e s of information.
(i) Lack of
look for information.
(i) Lack of Knowledge of right places to
(ii) Lack of
perseverance
Although there are limits to what professionals are expected to know, ignorance
in modern
is always a bad excuse. Ignorance is increasingly unacceptable
professional atmospheres.
5) Egocentricity & Egoism
People are said to be "ego-centric' if their perspective is limited. They are a
more generally known as "narrow-minded,, people. If engineers fail to realize
the importance of wider perspectives in the design of the product or a service,
their responsibility is weakened. According to
Pritchard, egocentricity can be
called as a special form of ignorance.
(7) Over-Confidence
Success can bring confidence. But continuous success can breed overconfidence.
And over-confidence can affect decision-making which can bring down
Over confidence may also result due
consistency in discharging responsibilities.
to lack of humility, presence of sub-ordinates who indulge in flattering, lack of
affects responsibility
competition, absolute power, and so on. Overconfidence
in the long run rather than in the short duration.
part of a group, both in the negative as well as positive sense. A man's behaviour
can also change as a member of one group and as a member of another group.
Behaviour, whether personal or professional, can directly affect the responsibility
of a person.
Irving Jamis has identified 8 symptoms of Group Behaviour which affect
responsibility of individuals who are part of that group. They are:
(i) Groups operate under the assumptions that they are not vulnerable to
failures.
(in) Non-members of groups and members of other groups are viewed as
outsiders and sometimes considered as adversaries or enemies.
(i) Groups never take responsibilities. In fact they shift, responsibilities especiay
in case of failures.
vii Groups generally guard tradition and are greatly resistant to change
HONESTY, INTEGRITY AND RELIABILITY
INTRODUCTION