Professional Documents
Culture Documents
9.1 Various reasons have been put forward to explain the difference in the proportion
of total investment made in business start-ups by Canadian and U.S. venture
capitalists. These include:
• Canadian venture capitalists are more cautious than their U.S. counterparts. Start-
ups are more risky and Canadian venture capitalists may be less willing to take on
these risks.
• Canadian venture capitalists have a shorter-term investment perspective that makes
them prefer financing existing businesses.
• There is greater competition among U.S. venture capitalists for good investment
opportunities, which leads them to invest in business start-ups to achieve the
required returns.
• U.S. venture capitalists have more funds to invest so they can invest more in
startups.
9.2 A listed business may wish to revert to unlisted status for a number of possible
reasons. These include:
• Cost. A stock exchange listing can be costly, as the business must adhere to
certain administrative regulations and financial disclosures (especially in the post-
Enron/WorldCom fraud era when the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 in the U.S.
created significant new regulatory and accounting requirements).
• Scrutiny. Listed businesses are subject to close scrutiny by analysts and this may
not be welcome if the business is engaged in sensitive negotiations or
controversial activities.
• Takeover risk. The shares of the business may be purchased by an unwelcome
bidder and this may result in a takeover.
• Investor profile. If the business is dominated by a few investors who wish to
retain their interest in the business and do not wish to raise further capital by
public issues, the benefits of a listing are few.
9.3 A bought deal involves an investment dealer buying the shares in the business and
then, in turn, selling the shares to the public. The risk is borne by the investment
dealer. The issue will be advertised by the publication of a prospectus that will set
out details of the business and the issue price of the shares (or reserve price if a
tender issue is being made).
In a best efforts issue, the investment dealer does not guarantee a price for the new
IPO. A best efforts issue runs the risk that the shares will not be sold and is a less
popular form of issue for businesses.
• Ambitious
• Experienced
• Capable
• Well balanced.
9.5 Warren Buffett’s success as an investor is an argument against the efficient market
hypothesis. The efficient market hypothesis implies that one cannot consistently
beat the market. That is, the best an investor can hope for over a long period is to
match the returns of the stock market averages. Mr. Buffett seems to have found a
way to exploit some market inefficiency to earn superior returns throughout his
long investment career.
9.1 5 Situations
2. Strong form of market efficiency - because the formal announcement did not
cause the share price to change significantly.
3. Strong form of market efficiency - because the formal announcement did not
cause the share price to change significantly.
5. Weak form of market efficiency - because the share price seems to be fluctuating
randomly.
9.2 Students should draw straight line trend lines connecting at least three points, up or
down channels, triangles, cup with handle, or other trend lines as appropriate to
each company’s stock chart.
You should buy ETFs in the small cap sector and the TSX 100 because they have the
highest 1-year growth rates.
(a)
(b) Miss Muserandathon fared rather poorly in her investment results from 2002 to
2005. She lost money in 2003, when the TSX returned a stellar 24.28%. From 2003
to 2005, her returns were significantly below the TSX Composite Index returns.
However things have turned around since then as she roundly beat the market index
in 2006 and 2007. In the great recession of 2008, her performance matched the
index with a loss of nearly 35%.
(b)
Your
company
should
only
invest
in
A
Ltd.
as
that
investment
is
the
only
one
with
an
internal
rate
of
return
larger
than
your
company’s
9%
cost
of
capital.
(b)
Your
company
should
invest
in
Four
Ltd.
as
it
is
the
only
investment
with
an
IRR
greater
than
your
company’s
9%
cost
of
capital.
(c)
(i) March 31, 2010
Share price $7.80
Number of shares 600
Value of your father’s holdings $4,680
(d) The value of your father’s MFIL holdings remains unaffected by the rights offering,
as long as he buys the shares or sells the rights. The value of his holdings will be
reduced if he lets the rights expire.
(c) A four-for-one stock split and a stock dividend of three shares for each share
outstanding are basically the same thing. Both result in a $6.25 share price. The
stock dividend reduces retained earnings, however, which may affect future cash
dividends.
The striking price should be $6.50 to maximize the share sale proceeds.
9.12 The answer to this question is covered in the chapter. Refer as necessary.
9.13 The answer to this question is covered in the chapter. Refer as necessary.
(b)
$
40,000,000
Selling
price
of
company
in
5
years
Leasing
Present
Tax savings Value
(45% tax Payment Factor Present Value
Year Payment rate) After Tax @ 10% @ 10%
1 $394,421.33 $177,489.60 $216,931.73 0.9091 $197,212.64
2 394,421.33 177,489.60 216,931.73 0.8264 179,272.38
3 394,421.33 177,489.60 216,931.73 0.7513 162,980.81
4 394,421.33 177,489.60 216,931.73 0.6830 148,164.37
5 394,421.33 177,489.60 216,931.73 0.6209 134,692.91
6 394,421.33 177,489.60 216,931.73 0.5645 122,457.96
7 394,421.33 177,489.60 216,931.73 0.5132 111,329.36
8 394,421.33 177,489.60 216,931.73 0.4665 101,198.65
9 394,421.33 177,489.60 216,931.73 0.4241 92,000.75
10 394,421.33 177,489.60 216,931.73 0.3855 83,627.18
11 394,421.33 177,489.60 216,931.73 0.3505 76,034.57
12 394,421.33 177,489.60 216,931.73 0.3186 69,114.45
13 394,421.33 177,489.60 216,931.73 0.2897 62,845.12
14 394,421.33 177,489.60 216,931.73 0.2633 57,118.12
15 394,421.33 177,489.60 216,931.73 0.2394 51,933.46
Net present value $1,649,982.73
Buying
Opening
Year UCC CCA @ 10% Closing UCC
Buying
Present
Tax Shield Value
(45% tax Net Cost Factor Present Value
Year Payment rate) of Buying @ 10% @ 10%
1 $394,421.33 $202,500.00 $191,921.33 0.9091 $174,475.68
2 394,421.33 259,001.04 135,420.29 0.8264 111,911.33
3 394,421.33 241,502.18 152,919.15 0.7513 114,888.16
4 394,421.33 224,818.44 169,602.89 0.6830 115,838.77
5 394,421.33 208,774.83 185,646.50 0.6209 115,267.91
6 394,421.33 193,204.50 201,216.83 0.5645 113,586.90
7 394,421.33 177,947.02 216,474.31 0.5132 111,094.62
8 394,421.33 162,846.70 231,574.63 0.4665 108,029.56
9 394,421.33 147,750.95 246,670.38 0.4241 104,612.91
10 394,421.33 132,508.77 261,912.56 0.3855 100,967.29
11 394,421.33 116,969.20 277,452.13 0.3505 97,246.97
12 394,421.33 100,979.82 293,441.51 0.3186 93,490.47
Beginning
Interest
Ending
Year
Balance
Payment
@
5%
Balance
1 $162,156.43
$20,000.00
$
-‐
$142,156.43
2
142,156.43
20,000.00
7,107.83
129,264.26
3
129,264.26
20,000.00
6,463.21
115,727.47
4
115,727.47
20,000.00
5,786.37
101,513.84
5
101,513.84
20,000.00
5,075.69
86,589.53
6
86,589.53
20,000.00
4,329.48
70,919.01
7
70,919.01
20,000.00
3,545.95
54,464.96
8
54,464.96
20,000.00
2,723.25
37,188.21
9
37,188.21
20,000.00
1,859.41
19,047.62
10
19,047.62
20,000.00
952.38
(0.00)
(b)
The
10-‐year
CCA
schedule
is:
(c) The ten year tax shield schedule for the purchase option is:
Buying
Leasing
(a) (i) Earnings per share for each financing option, and under each scenario, is as follows:
Loan issue
Scenario
Optimistic Most likely Pessimistic
$m $m $m
Earnings before interest and taxation 10.4 8.8 6.4
Interest (2.4 + 1.5) 3.9 3.9 3.9
Earnings before tax 6.5 4.9 2.5
Income tax (30%) 2.0 1.5 0.8
Net income 4.5 3.4 1.7
Dividend paid 1.2 1.2 1.2
Increase in retained earnings 3.3 2.2 0.5
EPS $4.5m/40m $3.4m/40m $1.7m/40m
$0.113 $0.085 $0.043
Rights issue
Scenario
Optimistic Most likely Pessimistic
$m $m $m
Earnings before interest and taxation 10.4 8.8 6.4
Interest 2.4 2.4 2.4
Earnings before tax 8.0 6.4 4.0
Income tax (30%) 2.4 1.9 1.2
Net income 5.6 4.5 2.8
Dividend paid 1.5 1.5 1.5
Increase in retained earnings 4.1 3.0 1.3
EPS $5.6m/50m $4.5m/50m $2.8m/50m
$0.112 $0.090 $0.056
Rights issue
Scenario
Optimistic Most likely Pessimistic
$m $m $m
[20/(20 + 39 + 15 + 4.1)] [20/(20 + 39 + 15 + 3.0)] [20/(20 + 39 + 15 + 1.3)]
× 100% × 100% × 100%
= 25.6% = 26.0% = 26.6%
Rights issue
Scenario
Optimistic Most likely Pessimistic
Earnings before interest and tax 10.4 8.8 6.4
Interest expense 2.4 2.4 2.4
Times interest earned 4.3 times 3.7 times 2.7 times
(b) We can see from the above that the leverage effect on returns is very small. There are only
modest variations in return to common shareholders between the rights option and the loan
option. However, the loan option does result in much higher leverage ratios and this will
have an effect on the debt capacity of the business. In addition, the times interest earned ratio
is significantly lower under the loan option. As the additional financial risk, revealed by
these ratios, is not reflected in higher returns to shareholders, more borrowing does not
appear to be an attractive option.
The existing EPS is $0.098 (that is, $3.9m/40m) and this is higher than the EPS forecasts for
the most likely and pessimistic scenarios. The existing leverage ratio of 33.9 per cent
[20m/(20m + 39m)] falls between the leverage ratios under the equity option and the loan
option. The existing times interest earned ratio of 3.3 times (8.0m ÷ 2.4m) is higher than all
scenarios under the loan issue option and the pessimistic scenario for the rights issue.
The calculations above do not reveal a compelling case for the expansion program.
$m
Earnings before interest and taxes (2011) 50.0[40m + (25% × 40m)]
Less Income tax (30%) 15.0
Earnings available to shareholders 35.0
Earnings per share ($35m/240m) = $0.146
Share price = EPS × P/E ratio*
= $0.146 × 15
= $2.19
* This is a rearrangement of the PE ratio formula shown above.
(a) The stages in calculating the theoretical ex-rights price of a common share are as
follows:
($)
Original shares (4 × $0.825) 3.30
Rights share (100% – 20%) × $0.825 0.66
Value of five shares following rights issue 3.96
Value of one share following the rights issue $3.96
5
Theoretical ex-rights price $0.792
(b) The price at which the rights are likely to be traded is:
($)
Value of one share after rights issue 0.792
Less: Cost of a rights share 0.660
Value of rights to shareholder 0.132
($)
Shareholding following rights issue [(4,000 + 1,000) × $0.792] 3,960
Less: Cost of rights shares (1,000 × $0.660) 660
Shareholder wealth 3,300
If the rights are neither purchased nor sold, the shareholder wealth following the rights
issue will be:
The investor will have the same wealth under the first two options. However, if the
investor does nothing, the rights issue will lapse and so the investor will lose the value of
the rights and will be worse off.