Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ALEXIS DORANGE
Alexis Dorange
Master’s Degree Project
Master in Aerospace Engineering
i
Abstract
ii
Referat
Kylsystemet är en avgörande del för en helikopters drift. Utan den kan
helikoptern inte hovra. Kylsystemet för huvudväxeln hos en helikopter består
av radiatorer och en fläkt. En fläkt är en aerodynamisk kropp och kan därför
förbättras gällande aerodynamisk e↵ektivitet. Därför måste olika parame-
trar övervägas när man utformar en ny axialfläkt för att få god aerody-
namisk prestanda. Simuleringar genomfördes för att undersöka e↵ekterna
av dessa parametrar och komma fram till en optimal utformning baserad på
undersökningskraven. Denna optimala utformning har visat en ökning av
massflödet upp till en faktor på cirka två för en given tryckförlust jämfört
med den ursprungliga fläkten.
iii
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank Mr. HONNORAT, project leader, for welcoming me in his
department for this project. I wish to thank particularly Mr. COQUILLAT
for mentoring me and guide me throughout this project with good advice, for
trusting me to do the best I could and achieve the target fixed. For helping
me when I needed help, whether in the professional or the personal domain.
I also thank Mr. SERR for helping me during the trainee, for his expertise in
the helicopter domain and for his joy everyday that makes everyone want to
work. I wish to thank both of them to have trusted me with this tremendous
project and motivated me when I had hard times. I also want to thank Mr.
BARRAUD for helping me with CAD software when I was struggling. I
want to thank Mr. DELECROIX, Mr. BLANCHARD and Mr. BIANCO
for my integration during the first month of my trainee period. I also want
to thank all the people in the department for welcoming me and integrate
me so quickly in the team. It has been a real pleasure to work with such a
devoted and competent team. Finally I wish to thank Ms. OTERO SOLA
for her advice, for the help provided and for her time and attention.
iv
Contents
1 Introduction 1
2 Background 3
2.1 Safran Engineering Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.2 Airbus Helicopters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2.1 History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2.2 H130 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.3 Basics of aerodynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3 Methodology 9
3.1 CFD Tools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.1.1 Governing equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.1.2 The Case Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.1.3 Turbulence model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.1.4 Wall Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.2 Mesh realization and control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5 Parameter investigation 22
5.1 Parameter definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
5.2 Blade thickness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
5.3 Blade angle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
5.4 Number of blades . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
5.5 Chord distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
5.6 Deflection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
5.7 Twisting law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
v
6.2.1 New shape of the hub . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
6.3 CFD Correction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
7 Mechanical Sizing 33
7.1 Beam Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
7.2 Finite Element Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
8 Conclusion 35
vi
List of Figures
4.1 Given CAD (left) and more accurate (right) CAD of the stan-
dard fan of the H130. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.2 Complete fan (rotor, stator and grid) design with CAD (left)
and simplified for CFD computation (right). . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.3 Target point, working curve of the original fan and aim of the
study (thick red line). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
4.4 Comparison between CFD computations and test on the orig-
inal fan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
4.5 Comparison of turbulence models in Ansys on the original fan. 21
vii
5.4 Velocity triangle for the H130 fan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
5.5 E↵ect of the blade thickness on the mass flow rate and the
power consumed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
5.6 E↵ect of the blade angle on the mass flow rate and the power
consumed by the fan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
5.7 Evolution of mass flow rate (left) and efficiency (right) with
respect to the AoA at fixed pressure losses PL1 and PL2. . . . 26
5.8 E↵ect of the number of blades, namely 6 (T1C1 6B) and more
than 6 (T1C1 B1) on the mass flow rate and power consumed
by the fan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
5.9 E↵ect of chord distribution on the mass flow rate and power
consumed by the fan. With T2 the original chord distribution
and T2 Chord the new chord distribution. . . . . . . . . . . . 27
5.10 E↵ect of the deflection on the mass flow rate and power con-
sumed by the fan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
5.11 E↵ect of twisting law on the mass flow rate and power con-
sumed by the fan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
viii
Nomenclature
Abbreviations
AH Airbus Helicopters
N-S Navier-Stokes
Symbols
↵ Angle of Attack
Blade Angle
⌧ Stress Tensor
D
Material derivative
Dt
r¨ Divergence Operator
⌘ Efficiency
g Body acceleration
q Heat flux
ix
u Flow velocity
B Partial Derivative
⇢ Density
CD Drag Coefficient
CL Lift Coefficient
D Drag
L Lift
p Pressure
t Time
x
Chapter 1
Introduction
Cooling systems are of various forms and for numerous applications : power
plants, engines, electric systems, etc. The objective of a cooling system is
to cool down an electronic or a mechanical device, such as an engine. A
cooling system comprises a closed loop of fluid which cools down the device
by exchanging heat with it, and a radiator which cools down the fluid with
air. Moreover this last exchange is accelerated by a fan.
On light helicopters, a cooling system regulates the temperature of hot
parts like the engine, the main gearbox and other components. The system
is composed by radiators and a fan. Due to the capacity of a helicopter to
fly in hover, without any relative wind, the cooling fan has to ensure a fresh
air flow through the radiators in all weather conditions otherwise the engine
risks to be overheated. The radiators are placed after the air intake at the
top cover of the machine. Following these radiators is the fan that blows
directly into the main transmission box.
As part of the continuous improvement of its product range, Airbus He-
licopters is seeking to improve the cooling system for the main gearbox and
engine on the H130 helicopter. The standard fan of the H130 is a commer-
cial fan built for trucks in the USA. It was sufficient at the beginning but
constant power improvements have led to an overheating when the outside
atmospheric temperature is too high, preventing the helicopter to even take
o↵. In this project , the axial cooling fan of the H130 is studied in order to
deal with the temperature limitations. However, the stator and the electronic
command of the fan will stay the same so the study is limited to the blades
and hub of the fan.
The approach used for the study is divided in several steps. First the
original fan is characterized to identify its current performance and the one
that needs to be fulfilled. Then a parameter study is carried out with Com-
putational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations to assess the impact of these
1
parameters on the fan. Based on this analysis, an optimal design is defined
and then characterized through calculations.
The report starts with a general background on the companies involved,
the helicopter under consideration and the basics of aerodynamics. Then the
CFD based methodology is presented, followed by the parameter investiga-
tion, the design analysis, and some conclusions.
2
Chapter 2
Background
This chapter provides a brief history of the companies involved in this project,
namely Safran Engineering Services, where the project has been carried out,
as a subcontractor for Airbus Helicopters. The H130 helicopter considered in
this analysis is presented, followed by a brief background to aerodynamics.
The French company is born from the merger of Teuchos and Labinal’s
Engineering and Technology division. Labinal Power Systems was a major
company in the aeronautic sector and was created in 1921 specialised in
design, production and implementation of electric wires in the aeronautic
sector.
Safran Engineering Services is selling its expertise in the following do-
mains: electrical systems, aerostructures, mechanical and software systems
and On-board electronic systems.
Today, SES employs more than 3,700 people on 19 sites in 10 countries,
working as a subcontractor for most of the major aerospace companies. SES’s
3
customers are mainly in the aeronautics sector, but they are also present
in the automotive, energy, rail and space industries in companies such as:
Airbus, Airbus Helicopters, Dassault Aviation, PSA... [3]
Since January, 1st 2014 the EADS Group has changed its name to Airbus
Group. This choice of communication lies in a desire to strengthen collabo-
ration between the di↵erent entities of the Airbus group and to rely on the
strong reputation of the Airbus name in order to find new markets for all
activities. On January, 7 th 2014 Eurocopter changed its name to Airbus
Helicopters.
4
Figure 2.4: Airbus Helicopters logo.
‚ Firefighting
5
Figure 2.5: H160 first pre series exemplar and military model ”Guépard”.
2.2.2 H130
The H130 is a member of Airbus’ Ecureuil family, which represents 42% of
Airbus’ in-service fleet and has accumulated more than 33 million flight hours
worldwide. There are more than 646 H130s operated in 50 countries. The
H130 is an intermediate single-engine helicopter with three blades on the
main rotor tailored for passenger transportation, sightseeing and VIP duties,
medical airlift, law enforcement and surveillance missions. It has a cabin up
to 7 passengers and a range of 617 km and a fast cruise speed of 128 knots
(237km/h [5] ). As the best-selling helicopter of the company the continuous
improvement is common on this helicopter so all components need to be
carefully investigated to adapt to those upgrades.
6
Figure 2.7: Airfoil nomenclature [1].
An airfoil is described by its geometry Fig 2.7: the upper surface and
lower surface, the leading edge which is the point at the front that has the
maximum radius and corresponds to the stagnation point. The trailing edge
is defined at the other end of the airfoil. The chord c, Fig 2.8, is the line
defined between the leading and the trailing edge. The mean camber line is
the line defined midway between the upper and lower surfaces; it depends on
the thickness and camber. The angle of attack ↵ is the angle between the
relative wind direction U8 , Fig 2.8, and the chord line [6].
The aerodynamic force is the force that the fluid is applying on the body
in which it is submerged due to the relative motion between the body and
the fluid, Fig 2.8. Depending on the chosen axes one can distinguish di↵erent
sets of components of the resultant aerodynamic force R. With respect to the
body axes, the two components are the normal force N and the axial force
A, perpendicular and parallel to the airfoil chord line respectively. Moreover,
the lift L, and the drag D, are the components of the aerodynamic force in
the freestream axes where the lift is the force perpendicular to the direction
of freestream velocity U8 and the drag is parallel to the relative freestream
velocity [7].
7
Figure 2.8: Aerodynamic forces [2].
From these forces are calculated the lift and drag coefficients that depends
on the geometry and on the fluid characteristics:
2L 2D
CL “ ; CD “ (2.2)
⇢SU8 2 ⇢SU8 2
With ⇢ is the density of the fluid, S is the wing surface area and U8 is the
freestream velocity.
8
Chapter 3
Methodology
This chapter goes through the theory behind CFD and the models used in
this trainee. It also explains the domain used and the quantities measured.
9
equation is the energy equation and come from the global energy of the
system.
The system 3.1 is a system of non-linear partial di↵erential equations.
The non-linearity occurs in the material derivative in the momentum equa-
tion. In order to solve it, boundary conditions are fixed. The CFD packages
use various numerical methods based on a mesh [9]. Finite-element methods
require a 2D or 3D mesh and are very flexible in terms of geometry and mesh
elements. At each mesh element, a base function is used. This base function
should locally describe the solution of (or part of) the governing equation to
be approximated. The finite-element method aims to minimize the di↵erence
between the exact solution and the collection of base functions [10]. How-
ever, problems in the fluid-mechanics area are generally governed by local
conservation. For instance, the continuity equation dictates the local con-
servation of mass. Local conservation is not necessarily a property of the
finite-element method, since the di↵erence between the base functions and
the exact solution is minimized globally. Most of the CFD packages are using
Finite Volume Method for the mesh since it is based on local conservation.
To solve the equations numerically with the finite volume method, the en-
tire computational domain is divided into ‘small’ sub-volumes, so-called cells.
Employing Gauss’ law, the partial derivatives expressing a conservation prin-
ciple, such as r¨u, can be rewritten at each cell as an algebraic contribution.
The governing equations are reformulated, at each computational cell, into a
set of linear algebraic equations. These equations are solved in an iterative
manner afterwards. The price for this so-called discretization of the domain
is the introduction of a numerical error into the solution [11].
For this simulation the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equa-
tions are solved to simplify the turbulence modelling and computations. They
are time-averaged equations of motion. The method is based on the decom-
position of every variable into the mean value and the fluctuating value of
the variable. Moreover the derivation of a mean value is equal to zero, so
this decomposition will greatly help to solve the equations.
10
translational speeds can be assigned to cell zones. It does not account for the
relative motion of a moving zone around other zones, in this case the mesh
remains fixed for the computation. It can be compared to freezing the motion
of the moving cell zone in a specific position and computing the instantaneous
flow field with the moving zone in that position [12]. To calculate the mass
flow rate the pressure loss is imposed thanks to a parameter that will fix the
pressure at the pressure inlet and outlet. As the rotation is simulated thanks
to the MRF, the other surfaces will be set as walls. This gives the following
domain:
Figure 3.2: Torque and axial force created on the fan by air.
The force on the rotation axis created by the fan which is the result of
the lift created by the blades, and the torque on the fan which is the result of
11
the drag created by the blades are computed in this simulation. The forces
are shown on Fig 3.2. And powers can be calculated from these forces:
Paero “ Faxis v and Pnec “ T ! (3.2)
where Paero is the aerodynamic power given by the force along the rotation
axis created by the blades Faxis and the fluid velocity along that axis v. And
Pnec is the necessary power to rotate the fan and is given by the torque T
and the rotational speed of the fan !. This power will then be assimilated
to an electric power. In Eq. 3.2, the speed v is obtained with the measured
mass flow rate q and the stator surface around the fan S:
q
v“ (3.3)
S
And the efficiency of the fan is:
Paero
⌘“ (3.4)
Pnec
12
The Enhanced Wall Treatment is then a near-wall modelling approach
that is capable of modelling with accuracy a fine near-wall mesh without
significantly reducing the accuracy for wall-function meshes by combining
the two-layer model with enhanced wall functions.
The viscosity-a↵ected near-wall region is entirely resolved all the way to
the viscous sublayer with the near-wall model . The two-layer approach is an
integral part of the enhanced wall treatment and is used to specify both ✏ and
the turbulent viscosity in the near-wall cells. In this approach, the domain
is divided into one viscosity-a↵ected region and one fully-turbulent region.
The separation of the two regions is determined by a wall-distance-based,
turbulent Reynolds number, Re y , defined as:
?
⇢y k
Rey ” (3.5)
µ
where y is the wall-normal distance from the nearest wall and is calculated
at the cell centers with the following equation:
where ~r is the position vector at the field point, and ~rw is the position
vector of the wall boundary. w is the union of all the wall boundaries
involved. With this interpretation y is uniquely defined in the flow domain
and is independent of the mesh topology.
In the fully turbulent region ( Rey ° 200), the k- ✏ model is employed
whereas in the viscosity-a↵ected near-wall region ( Rey † 200), the one-
equation model of Wolfshtein [15] is employed. In the one-equation model,
the momentum equations and the k equation are retained.
To extend the method to the near-wall region, the CFD software blends
the linear (laminar) and logarithmic (turbulent) laws-of-the-wall:
1
u ` “ e u` `
lam ` e uturb (3.7)
apy ` q4
“´ (3.8)
1 ` by `
where a “ 0.01 and b “ 5.
The software will then calculate the wall-function to apply to every region
to keep y ` † 60 [16].
13
3.2 Mesh realization and control
To realize a good mesh the geometry need to be simplified first. In fact there
can be some useless surfaces such as holes for screws or chamfers on surfaces.
Also some volumes can be simplified as surfaces. The domain needs to be
created according to the Fig 3.1. To create a good mesh it needs to be more
refined where its behaviour will change. For this case the mesh needs to be
refined on the blades with even closer refinement at the leading and trailing
edge. The boundary layer is meshed with the wall functions that has been
described before. After meshing, the permeability of the mesh needs to be
checked. In fact it can happen that some surfaces are not glued and that the
nodes on both surfaces do not correspond to each other. A tool allows to
join all the surfaces of the model, but it has a limitation that implies local
modification by hand.
On Fig 3.3 it can be seen that the two surfaces has not been joined
perfectly. These are two surfaces of di↵erent parts. So it has to be done
by hand. After checking the permeability and repairing the potential errors,
the quality of the mesh needs to be checked and it is done by checking the
skewness. The skewness allow to check the quality with the following formula:
optimal cell size ´ cell size
Skewness “ (3.9)
optimal cell size
14
Figure 3.4: Skewness theory illustration with the ideal cell size (green), and
the current cell created by the meshing tool (purple).
15
Figure 3.6: Section of the volume mesh when cutting horizontally the domain
of computation at the middle of the fan.
On the figure above one can see the refinements near the surface of the
fan and around the stator part on the left. The wall treatment can also
be seen on the same parts. The blue zone is the MRF zone so it is refined
compared to the tube in purple.
The residuals given by the computation are the following:
16
On all the residuals one can observe that when the inlet pressure changes
it forms a spike and that every sub computation for every pressure value is
converging to a stable solution.
17
Chapter 4
In this chapter, the original fan is analyzed and characterized showing the
di↵erence between the CFD results and a test on the original fan. Note that
due to confidentiality reasons, sensitive information has been omitted from
the results.
As previously said the standard fan was initially designed for trucks and
is used by the company on the H130. The fan was earlier designed on
Computer-Aided Design (CAD) software thanks to surface mapping, but
its design was incorrect so the airfoil has been redesigned in order to create
a more accurate design. In addition to the fan, there are also structural
parts such as a stator and a grid that comes with the fan furnished by the
manufacturer.
18
Figure 4.1: Given CAD (left) and more accurate (right) CAD of the standard
fan of the H130.
Figure 4.2: Complete fan (rotor, stator and grid) design with CAD (left) and
simplified for CFD computation (right).
With the pressure loss in the circuit and with the characteristics of the fan
given by CETIAT, namely the company which provided tests and certifica-
tion for fans, the working point of the fan was found. This point is defined as
the intersection of the two curves namely Pressure Loss and Working Curve
Fan, see Fig. 4.3. The target working point for the new fan, called from now
on simply target point, was calculated and appears as a black diamond on
the figure.
The target point corresponds to the mass flow rate and pressure loss
the new fan has to achieve in order to prevent a overheating of the main
19
gearbox when the H130 is performing a hover flight at the maximum outside
temperature specified on the requirements specification with the maximum
mass onboard it can carry. This point is very important since it will be our
goal when designing the new fan. In this study the goal is to change the
working curve to make it intersect with the pressure loss in the circuit at the
target point as show the thick red line in Fig 4.3.
Figure 4.3: Target point, working curve of the original fan and aim of the
study (thick red line).
The electric circuit that powers the fan will neither be changed. So in
this study we will keep the power specifications on the H130 which will give
a limit in electric power. This design is simulated in order to compare the
simulation results with the test results in terms of pressure loss, mass flow
rate and required power. The test results are furnished by CETIAT which
measured the speed and pressure on the fan to give a working curve.
Figure 4.4: Comparison between CFD computations and test on the original
fan.
20
One can observe that in terms of pressure loss, the simulation is close
to the test for a simple model. Moreover, the CFD computation gives more
linear behaviour than the test. The CFD computations show a margin of
power compared to the H130 limitation. This calculation will be used as
a reference to compare CFD results and real results. The final design will
be therefore scaled with that di↵erence, see Sec 6.3. However, no data is
available for the power consumption of the original fan so this part can no
be scaled.
In the Ansys article [13] it is recommended to be careful when using the
Realizable k- ✏ model with MRF, therefore a computation has been realized
to compare the e↵ects. The results show that the realizable model is more
accurate than the standard one, as shown in the Fig. 4.5. In fact, the
computation with the realizable k- ✏ model gives closer results with respect
to the CETIAT data so it will be used for all the computations.
21
Chapter 5
Parameter investigation
This chapter provides a description of all the parameters found a↵ecting the
aerodynamic performance of the axial fan and how they a↵ect the perfor-
mance.
It then raised the question of the thickness as shown on Fig 5.2 of the
airfoil which has been analyzed. Another parameter is the blade angle and
the angle of attack illustrated on Fig 5.3 (left). The angle of attack can
change along the blade which will create a twist as shown on Fig 5.3 (right).
This is called the twisting law of the blade and it will be also analyzed. The
e↵ect of the number of blades on the fan is also an important parameter of
the study. And deflection has been added to the blade to characterize its
22
e↵ect. Finally, the chord distribution along the blade was changed. For the
profile of the blade several thicknesses were used: a thick one called T1, and
two thinner ones T2 and T3. The measured blade angle on the original fan
is called C0 and di↵erent angles C1, C2 will be tried where C1†C0†C2. A
linear and a calculated twisting law will be tested. The e↵ect of the number
of blades will be compared with respect to the original configuration of six
blades and we define B1 as a number of blades with B1°6.
C3 is the blade angle to have a zero angle of attack, calculated using the
velocity triangle at the leading edge, illustrated in Fig 5.4. According to the
ONERA article on design of turbomachines [17], the triangle is defined by:
$
~ ~ ~
&U “ R ^ !
’
V~ “ ~q {⇢S (5.1)
’
% 2
W “U `V 2 2
Where R ~ is the radius and !~ is the rotational speed of the fan. ~q is the mass
flow rate, ⇢ is the density of the fluid and S is the surface of fluid a↵ected by
the fan. Those quantities define the rotating speed of air U ~ and the absolute
23
speed of air V~ . From these vectors is calculated W~ , the relative speed as
seen by the rotor. From this triangle we find the blade angle .
ˆ ˙
U
“ atan (5.2)
V
This angle is calculated for di↵erent radius of the blade and this gives the
twist distribution along the blade. This is by definition the angle distribution
for a zero angle of attack.
Figure 5.5: E↵ect of the blade thickness on the mass flow rate and the power
consumed.
In Fig 5.5, T1 which is the thickest airfoil, gives the best mass flow rate
at same pressure loss (Fig. 5.5 left) but also requires the highest power to
rotate the fan (Fig. 5.5 right). And T3, the thinnest airfoil gives the lowest
mass flow rate but requires the lowest power. Therefore a thicker airfoil
gives better performance in terms of mass flow rate and with higher required
power. In fact the thicker the airfoil is, the higher the lift coefficient will be
24
resulting in an increase in terms of mass flow rate. However, a thicker airfoil
will also imply more drag and by consequence more power consumption.
Figure 5.6: E↵ect of the blade angle on the mass flow rate and the power
consumed by the fan.
25
Figure 5.7: Evolution of mass flow rate (left) and efficiency (right) with
respect to the AoA at fixed pressure losses PL1 and PL2.
Figure 5.8: E↵ect of the number of blades, namely 6 (T1C1 6B) and more
than 6 (T1C1 B1) on the mass flow rate and power consumed by the fan.
This analysis has been realized with T1 being the thinner airfoil, C1 being
the lowest blade angle and B1°6. From Fig 5.8 one can observe that the gap
with respect to the target has been reduced by adding blades.
However we can also observe that for a small pressure loss, the design
with more blades generates a smaller mass flow rate but also a smaller power
consumption compared to the design with 6 blades. This comes from the
26
overlapping of blades that prevent air to follow the normal path and then
goes through less surface creating less drag and lift consequently.
Figure 5.9: E↵ect of chord distribution on the mass flow rate and power
consumed by the fan. With T2 the original chord distribution and T2 Chord
the new chord distribution.
From Fig 5.9, we can clearly see that the chord distribution has a minimal
impact on the performance so the original chord distribution will be kept.
5.6 Deflection
For this study deflection is added on the blade at mid radius of the blade.
This study has been realized with the thick airfoil T3 and the blade angle
C4 described in Section 5.3. In the T3C4 Deflect case, a deflection of 20 %
of the chord is applied at mid radius.
Figure 5.10: E↵ect of the deflection on the mass flow rate and power con-
sumed by the fan.
The deflection itself should not have almost any impact on the results but
we can observe a slight di↵erence. This is due to the fact that the path of
27
the airflow is not the same with the deflection. In fact, it will encounter the
deflected part in the first place changing the local behaviour of the air. The
result is that it creates less lift so makes the fan move away from the target
but also less drag so less power consumed by the fan.
Figure 5.11: E↵ect of twisting law on the mass flow rate and power consumed
by the fan.
The result is that the calculated law is giving less drag so consuming less
power as can be seen on Fig 5.11 (right), and on the left part of the figure
one can see that the calculated law also creates more lift so gives a higher
mass flow rate making the design slightly closer to the target. Consequently,
this twist will be kept for all designs.
28
Chapter 6
In this chapter, di↵erent fan designs are analysed based on the previous
parameter investigation. An iterative approach is used focused on di↵er-
ent characteristics in order to maximise the performance of the original fan
design.
Figure 6.1: Fan performance for a design based on low power consumption.
29
It is clear from the figure above that this iteration did not give great
results since it has poor performance when subjected to a low pressure loss
and consume more than the original fan. After focusing on the power con-
sumption, the next step aims to increase the mass flow rate.
Figure 6.2: Fan performance for a design based on high mass flow rate.
This design is clearly better in terms of mass flow rate for a given pressure
loss but it is also worse in terms of drag since the blades have a higher angle.
Yet, there is a little margin in terms of power and the target in performance
has not been yet reached. So additional performance improvements needs to
be obtained. In the following section, the hub is changed.
30
6.2.1 New shape of the hub
In the third iteration the design is centered on a new hub. In fact, for now
the air collides on a plan, so it creates local turbulence and the air which
arrives on the root of the blades is not perfectly laminar preventing the root
to work as it should. So in order to gain performance an eclipsed shape hub
has been used which will propagate the air more properly towards the blades.
This solution gives a higher mass flow rate, improving the fan design. This
design will be considered in this project as the optimal and final design.
Figure 6.3: Fan performance for a design based on high mass flow rate with
a new hub.
Figure 6.4: Corrected final design fan performance. The full lines being CFD
results and the dashed the test and the scaled final design.
As shown in Fig 6.4, after correction the final design of the fan gives
an even better performance with a mass flow rate increase up to a factor
31
of about two for the pressure loss at the target point compared to the real
original fan (CETIAT).
32
Chapter 7
Mechanical Sizing
After finishing the design, the question of mechanical sizing was raised to
ensure that there will not be any mechanical issue with the new design such
as the blades getting broken.
Fc
Fc “ L! 2 mblade ; c “ (7.1)
S
Where Fc is the centrifugal force and is defined by the length of the blade L,
its mass mblade and the rotational speed of the fan !. The torsion constraint
33
c created by the centrifugal force is defined with the surface S “ ce and R
which is the distance from the root to the centre of gravity.
The flexion is given by:
RFaero e ce3
f “ ; I“ (7.2)
I 2 12
Where f is the flexion constraint and is defined with the aerodynamic force
Faero and the second moment of area I.
The total constraint t is obtained by adding the two ones :
t “ c ` f (7.3)
34
Chapter 8
Conclusion
The original fan of the H130 has been investigated for further improvements.
Through a parameter investigation an optimal design has been defined with
a higher blade angle, a non-linear twisting of the blades, a medium thick
airfoil, a higher number of blades and an eclipsed shape hub. With this op-
timal design the fan performance gets closer to the target point calculated
with the H130 specifications. The gap with respect to the target point was
decreased by a factor of about two compared to the original fan. Finally, a
mechanical sizing study has shown that the blades will not break when the
fan is working, validating the final design.
As a future work this study has proven that the study requirements were
too limiting so there is a need to find a way too change the requirements. This
could be by increasing the power given to the fan which would allow some
changes on the fan itself or on the rotational speed. It could also concern the
modification of the structural parts around the fan since the current one were
not designed for the new blade profile. These parts could also be changed to
design a bigger fan. A test should be carried out to characterize the new fan
design and after validation of the gain a series of tests should be performed
before its installation on the helicopter.
35
Bibliography
36
[13] Ansys Fluent. Realizable k ´ ✏ model, 2009,
https://www.afs.enea.it/project/neptunius/docs/fluent/html/th/node60.htm.
37