University of Bahrain

College of Engineering
Department of Civil Engineering

CENG417 – Steel Design

Project

Done By: Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Ali – 20195593

Ahmed Abbas Radhi Habib – 20198553
Sayed Hashem Saeed Hashem Alghani – 20195854

Section Number: 1

Instructor: Dr. Abdulhameed Mohamed Irhouma

 Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction.......................................................................................................1
1.1 Objective........................................................................................................1
2.0 Drawings (AutoCAD) .......................................................................................2
2.1 Plans ..............................................................................................................2
2.1 Bracings .........................................................................................................3
3.0 Load Arrangement.............................................................................................4
3.1 Loads of Slabs................................................................................................4
3.2 Loads of Beams and Girders ..........................................................................5
3.3 Loads of Columns ..........................................................................................7
4.0 Shear and Moment Diagrams ..........................................................................10
5.0 Groups of the Structures..................................................................................19
5.1 Groups of Beams and Girders ......................................................................19
5.2 Groups of Columns ......................................................................................20
6.0 Design of Beams .............................................................................................21
7.0 Design of Columns..........................................................................................33
8.0 Design of Baseplates .......................................................................................39
9.0 Design of Bracings ..........................................................................................42
9.1 Loads of Bracings ........................................................................................42
9.2 Design of Critical Compression Bracing ......................................................45
9.3 Design of Critical Tension Bracing ..............................................................47
10.0 Design of Connections ..................................................................................48
10.1 Beam to Beam Connection .........................................................................48
10.2 Beam to Column Connection .....................................................................50
10.3 Bracing Connection....................................................................................52
11.0 Bill of Materials ............................................................................................54
12.0 Conclusion ....................................................................................................60
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 1 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Introduction
4/5/2023 4/5/2023 4/5/2023
Ref.
1.0 Introduction
On this project we as group members, are going to make a full steel
design for the main structural system of a Warehouse storage flooring
with configuration, it is composed of two floors that can have the
configuration, also the floors are composite which consist of corrugated
steel sheet and concrete slab.

All the members are rolled section, and the beams are universal
beams and columns are universal columns, the connections are simple
bolted connections for beam-column joints. All the bracings are double
angles connected back to back where the gusset plates are in between
the angles.

All the steel design requirements will be shown below in the report.

1.1 Objective

To design a safe and economic warehouse as much as possible, to

make sure that it will be able to carry all the loads which are designed.
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Student Mohd
Ahmed Name Student Abbas
Ahmed Name StudentHashem
Sayed Name 20 of 000
60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Drawings
Plans
00/0/2000
4/5/2023 00/0/2000
4/5/2023 00/0/2000
4/5/2023
Ref.
2.0 Drawings (AutoCAD)
2.1 Plans
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 3 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Drawings
4/5/2023 4/5/2023 4/5/2023
Ref.
2.2 Bracings
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 4 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Loads of Slabs
4/5/2023 4/5/2023 4/5/2023
Ref.
3.0 Load Arrangement
3.1 Loads of Slabs

➢ Level 1
𝑆𝑒𝑙𝑓 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 = [1 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 ] × 1.4 = 1.4 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2
𝐿𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = [5000 𝑘𝑔⁄𝑚2 × 9.81 𝑚⁄𝑠 2 ] × 1.6
= 78480 𝑁/𝑚2 = 78.48 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 1.4 + 78.48 = 79.88 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2

➢ Level 2
𝑆𝑒𝑙𝑓 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 = [23.6 𝑘𝑁/𝑚3 × 0.18 𝑚 + 0.3 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 ] × 1.4
= 6.367 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2
𝐿𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = [5000 𝑘𝑔⁄𝑚2 × 9.81 𝑚⁄𝑠 2 ] × 1.6 = 78480 𝑁/𝑚2
= 78.48 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2
𝐿𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = [6.5 𝑘𝑁⁄𝑚2 ] × 1.6 = 10.4 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 6.367 + 78.48 + 10.4 = 95.247 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 5 of 60
Description: Loads of Beams and Date: Date: Date:
Girders 4/5/2023 4/5/2023 4/5/2023
Ref.
3.2 Loads of Beams and Girders
➢ Level 1
𝑆𝑒𝑙𝑓 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 (𝐴𝑙𝑙 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑠) = [0.05 × 79.88𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 ] × 1.4
= 5.59 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
o Beam 2
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 79.88 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 × 2 𝑚 = 159.76 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 159.76 + 5.59 = 165.35 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
o Girder 1
𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 165.35 𝑘𝑁/𝑚 × 3.5 𝑚 = 578.73 𝑘𝑁
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 5.59 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
o Girder 2
𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 165.35 𝑘𝑁/𝑚 × 7 𝑚 = 1157.45 𝑘𝑁
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 5.59 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
o Beam 1
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 79.88 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 × 1 𝑚 = 79.88 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 79.88 + 5.59 = 85.47 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 6 of 60
Description: Loads of Beams and Date: Date: Date:
Girders 4/5/2023 4/5/2023 4/5/2023
Ref.
➢ Level 2
𝑆𝑒𝑙𝑓 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 (𝐴𝑙𝑙 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑠) = [0.05 × 95.247𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 ] × 1.4
= 6.67 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
o Beam 4
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 95.247 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 × 2 𝑚 = 190.49 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 190.49 + 6.67 = 197.16 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
o Girder 3
𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 197.16 𝑘𝑁/𝑚 × 1.75 𝑚 = 345.03 𝑘𝑁
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 95.247 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 × 1.75 𝑚 = 166.68 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 166.68 + 6.67 = 173.35 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
o Girder 4
𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 197.16 𝑘𝑁/𝑚 × 3.5 𝑚 = 690.06 𝑘𝑁
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 95.247 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 × 3.5 𝑚 = 333.36 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 333.36 + 6.67 = 340.03 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
o Beam 3
𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 197.16 × 1 = 197.16 𝑘𝑁
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 95.247 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 × 1 𝑚 = 95.247 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 95.247 + 6.67 = 101.92 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
o Beam 5
𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 197.16 𝑘𝑁/𝑚 × 2 𝑚 = 394.32 𝑘𝑁
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 95.247 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 × 2 𝑚 = 190.49 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 190.49 + 6.67 = 197.16 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 7 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Loads of Columns
4/5/2023 4/5/2023 4/5/2023
Ref.
3.3 Loads of Columns
➢ Level 1
Column 1 (A1,A4,C1,C5)
Total Self Weight = 79.88 kN/m2
Total Slab Load = 79.88 × [3 × 3.5 × 1]= 838.74 kN
Beam Load = 5.59 × [7/2 × 2] = 39.13 kN
Girder Load = 5.59 × [(2+2/2)] = 16.77 kN
Column Self-Weight = 5.59 kN
Total Column Load = 900.23 kN

Column 2 (B1)
Total Self Weight = 79.88 kN/m2
Total Slab Load = 79.88 × [3 × 7 × 1]= 1677.48 kN
Beam Load = 5.59 × [7× 2] = 78.26 kN
Girder Load = 5.59 × [(2+2/2)] = 16.77 kN
Column Self-Weight = 5.59 kN
Total Column Load = 1778.1 kN

Column 3 (A2,A3,C2,C3,C4)
Total Self Weight = 79.88 kN/m2
Total Slab Load = 79.88 × [6 × 3.5 × 1]= 1677.48 kN
Beam Load = 5.59 × [7/2 × 3] = 58.695 kN
Girder Load = 5.59 × [(2+2+2/2+2/2)] = 33.54 kN
Column Self-Weight = 5.59 kN
Total Column Load = 1775.305 kN
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 8 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Loads of Column
4/5/2023 4/5/2023 4/5/2023
Ref.
Column 4 (B2,B3)
Total Self Weight = 79.88 kN/m2
Total Slab Load = 79.88 × [6 × 7 × 1]= 3359.96 kN
Beam Load = 5.59 × [7/2 × 3 + 7/2 × 3 ] = 117.39 kN
Girder Load = 5.59 × [(2+2+2/2+2/2)] = 33.54 kN
Column Self-Weight = 5.59 kN
Total Column Load = 3511.48 kN

Column 5 (B4)
Total Self Weight = 79.88 kN/m2
Total Slab Load = 79.88 × [6 × 3.5] + [3 × 3.5] = 1687.98 kN
Beam Load = 5.59 × [7 × 2 + 3.5] = 97.825 kN
Girder Load = 5.59 × [(2+2+2/2+2/2)] = 33.54 kN
Column Self-Weight = 5.59 kN
Total Column Load = 1824.935 kN

➢ Level 2
Column 1 (A1,A3,C1,C3)
Total Self Weight = 95.247 kN/m2
Total Slab Load = 95.247 × [3 × 3.5 × 1] = 1000.1 kN
Beam Load = 6.67 × [3.5 × 2] = 46.69 kN
Girder Load = 6.67 × [(2+1)/2)] = 13.34 kN
Column Self-Weight = 6.67 kN
Total Column Load = 1066.8 kN
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 9 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Loads of Columns
4/5/2023 4/5/2023 4/5/2023
Ref.
Column 2 (B2)
Total Self Weight = 95.247 kN/m2
Total Slab Load = 95.247 × [6 × 7 × 1] = 4000.374 kN
Beam Load = 6.67 × [3.5 × 6] = 140.07 kN
Girder Load = 6.67 × [(6+6/2+6/2)] = 80.04 kN
Column Self-Weight = 6.67 kN
Total Column Load = 4227.154 kN

Column 3 (A2,B1,B3,C2)
Total Self Weight = 95.247 kN/m2
Total Slab Load = 95.247 × [3 × 7 × 1] = 2000.187 kN
Beam Load = 6.67 × [7 × 2] = 93.38 kN
Girder Load = 6.67 × [(3+3/2+3/2)] = 40.02 kN
Column Self-Weight = 6.67 kN
Total Column Load = 2140.257 kN
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 10 of 60
Description: Shear and Moment Date: Date: Date:
Diagrams 5/5/2023 5/5/2023 5/5/2023
Ref.
4.0 Shear and Moment Diagrams
Note: All shear and moment diagrams were plotted using
https://structural-analyser.com/
Girder 1
𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 165.35 𝑘𝑁/𝑚 × 3.5 𝑚 = 578.73 𝑘𝑁
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 5.59 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 11 of 60
Description: Shear and Moment Date: Date: Date:
Diagrams 5/5/2023 5/5/2023 5/5/2023
Ref.
Beam 1
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 79.88 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 × 1 𝑚 = 79.88 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 79.88 + 5.59 = 85.47 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 12 of 60
Description: Shear and Moment Date: Date: Date:
Diagrams 5/5/2023 5/5/2023 5/5/2023
Ref.
Girder 2
𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 165.35 𝑘𝑁/𝑚 × 7 𝑚 = 1157.45 𝑘𝑁
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 5.59 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 13 of 60
Description: Shear and Moment Date: Date: Date:
Diagrams 5/5/2023 5/5/2023 5/5/2023
Ref.
Beam 2
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 79.88 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 × 2 𝑚 = 159.76 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 159.76 + 5.59 = 165.35 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 14 of 60
Description: Shear and Moment Date: Date: Date:
Diagrams 5/5/2023 5/5/2023 5/5/2023
Ref.
Beam 3
𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 197.16 × 1 = 197.16 𝑘𝑁
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 95.247 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 × 1 𝑚 = 95.247 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 95.247 + 6.67 = 101.92 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 15 of 60
Description: Shear and Moment Date: Date: Date:
Diagrams 5/5/2023 5/5/2023 5/5/2023
Ref.
Girder 3
𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 197.16 𝑘𝑁/𝑚 × 1.75 𝑚 = 345.03 𝑘𝑁
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 95.247 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 × 1.75 𝑚 = 166.68 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 166.68 + 6.67 = 173.35 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 16 of 60
Description: Shear and Moment Date: Date: Date:
Diagrams 5/5/2023 5/5/2023 5/5/2023
Ref.
Girder 4
𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 197.16 𝑘𝑁/𝑚 × 3.5 𝑚 = 690.06 𝑘𝑁
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 95.247 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 × 3.5 𝑚 = 333.36 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 333.36 + 6.67 = 340.03 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 17 of 60
Description: Shear and Moment Date: Date: Date:
Diagrams 5/5/2023 5/5/2023 5/5/2023
Ref.
Beam 4
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 95.247 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 × 2 𝑚 = 190.49 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 190.49 + 6.67 = 197.16 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 18 of 60
Description: Shear and Moment Date: Date: Date:
Diagrams 5/5/2023 5/5/2023 5/5/2023
Ref.
Beam 5
𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 197.16 𝑘𝑁/𝑚 × 2 𝑚 = 394.32 𝑘𝑁
𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 95.247 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 × 2 𝑚 = 190.49 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 190.49 + 6.67 = 197.16 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 19 of 60
Description: Groups of Beams Date: Date: Date:
and Girders 5/5/2023 5/5/2023 5/5/2023
Ref.
5.0 Groups of the Structures
5.1 Groups of Beams and Girders

Level 1
Beam Length (m) Shear (kN) Moment (kN.m)
Girder 1 6 595.5 1182.61
Beam 1 7 299.15 523.5
Girder 2 6 1174.22 2340.05
Beam 2 7 496.0 744.08

Level 2
Beam Length (m) Shear (kN) Moment (kN.m)
Beam 3 7 353.38 790.93
Girder 3 6 605.05 1094.54
Girder 4 6 1200.11 b to c 2173.52
Beam 4 7 591.48 1174.75
Beam 5 7 690.06 1552.64

Group Beams Length (m) Shear (kN) Moment (kN.m)

Beam 1
Beam 2
Group 1 Beam 3 7 690.06 1552.64
Beam 4
Beam 5
Girder 1
Group 2 6 605.05 1182.61
Girder 3
Girder 2
Group 3 6 1200.11 2340.05
Girder 4
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 20 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Groups of Columns
5/5/2023 5/5/2023 5/5/2023
Ref.
5.2 Groups of Columns

Group 1
Length (m) 6
Columns A4,B4,C4,B5,C5
F (kN) 1824.935

Group 2
Length (m) 12
Columns A1,C1,A2,C2,A3,C3,B1
F (kN) 3918.357

Group 3
Length (m) 12
Columns B2,B3
F (kN) 7738.634
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 21 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Beams
13/5/2023 13/5/2023 13/5/2023
Ref.
6.0 Design of Beams
Group 1 (F=690.06 kN, M=1552.64 kN.m)

Try 838×292×176
From Table of Properties:
D=834.9 mm, T=18.8 mm, t=14 mm, b/T=7.76, d/t=54.4,
Sx=6810×103 mm3, Zx=5890×103 mm3, u=0.856, x=46.5
ry=59mm, rx=331mm, Ix=246000×104 mm4
𝑇 = 18.8 > 16 → 𝑃𝑦 = 265 𝑀𝑃𝑎
✓ Section Classification
Table11
275 275
𝜀=√ =√ = 1.019
𝑃𝑦 265
𝐹𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒: 𝑏/𝑇 = 7.76 < 9𝜀
𝑊𝑒𝑏: 𝑑/𝑡 = 54.4 < 80𝜀
∴ 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1 (𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐), 𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚
✓ Check for Shear
𝑑/𝑡 = 54.4 < 70𝜀 → 𝑁𝑜 𝑆ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐵𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔
4.4.5
𝐴𝑣 = 𝐷𝑡 = 834.9 × 14 = 11688.6 𝑚𝑚2
4.2.3
𝑃𝑣 = 0.6𝑃𝑦𝐴𝑣 = 0.6 × 265 × 11688.6 = 1858.49 𝑘𝑁
𝑃𝑣 > 𝐹 → 𝑆ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑘
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 22 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Beams
13/5/2023 13/5/2023 13/5/2023
Ref.
✓ Check for Moment
4.2.5.2 0.6𝑃𝑣 = 0.6 × 1148.98 = 1115.09 > 𝐹 → 𝐿𝑜𝑤 𝑆ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟
𝑀𝑐 = 𝑃𝑦𝑆𝑥 = 265 × 6810 × 103 = 1804.65 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
𝑀𝑐 > 𝑀 → 𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑏𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑐

✓ Lateral Torsional Buckling

4.3.6.1 Provide Intermediate Lateral Supports
𝐿𝐸 = 3.5 𝑚 = 3500 𝑚𝑚
𝐿𝐸 3500
𝜆= = = 59.32
𝑟𝑦 59
𝜆 59.32
= = 1.275
𝑥 46.5
Table19 𝑣 = 0.98
4.3.6.9
𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1 𝑎𝑛𝑑 2 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠, 𝛽𝑤 = 1
4.3.6.7 𝜆𝐿𝑇 = 𝑢𝑣𝜆𝛽1/2 𝑤 = 0.856 × 0.98 × 59.32 × 11/2 = 49.76
Table16
𝑃𝑏 = 232 𝑀𝑃𝑎

4.3.6.4
𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1: 𝑀𝑏 = 𝑃𝑏 × 𝑆𝑥 = 232 × 6810 × 103
= 1579.92 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚

0.875m 0.875m 0.875m 0.875m

M1 M2 M3 M4 M5
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 23 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Beams
13/5/2023 13/5/2023 13/5/2023
Ref.
𝑀1 = 𝟎
1 1
𝑀2 = 690.06 × 0.875 − 172.55 × 0.875 × × 0.875 ×
2 3
= 𝟓𝟖𝟏. 𝟕𝟖𝟒𝟒 𝒌𝑵. 𝒎
1 1 1
𝑀3 = 690.06 × 1.75 − 197.2 × 0.75 × − 197.2 × × ( + 0.75)
2 2 3
= 𝟏𝟎𝟒𝟓. 𝟑𝟐 𝒌𝑵. 𝒎
1 1
𝑀4 = 690.06 × 2.62 − 197.2 × × ( + 1.625)
2 3
1 1
− 197.2 × × ( + 0.75 + 0.125)
2 3
0.125 0.125
− (197.2 − 172.55) × × ×2
2 3
0.125
− 172.55 × 0.125 × = 𝟏𝟑𝟓𝟖. 𝟎𝟏𝟒𝟓 𝒌𝑵. 𝒎
2
𝑀5 = 𝟏𝟓𝟓𝟐. 𝟔𝟒 𝒌𝑵. 𝒎
0.15𝑀2 + 0.5𝑀3 + 0.15𝑀4
𝑚𝐿𝑇 = 0.2 +
Table18 𝑀𝑚𝑎𝑥
0.15(581.7844 ) + 0.5(1045.32 ) + 0.15(1358.0145 )
𝑚𝐿𝑇 = 0.2 +
1552.64
= 0.724
𝑀𝑏 1579.92
= = 2182.21 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
𝑚𝐿𝑇 0.724
𝑀𝑥 = 1552.64 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
𝑀𝑏
4.3.6.2 𝑀𝑥 <
𝑚𝐿𝑇
∴ 𝑜𝑘, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔.
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 24 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Beams
13/5/2023 13/5/2023 13/5/2023
Ref.
✓ Deflection Check
5 × 𝑤 × 𝐿4
𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝑈𝐷𝐿) =
384 × 𝐸 × 𝐼
5 × 123.25 × (7000)4
= = 7.64𝑚𝑚
384 × (205 × 103 ) × (246000 × 104 )

W 𝐿3
𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑) =
48 × 𝐸 × 𝐼
246.4375 × 103 × (7000)3
= = 3.492𝑚𝑚
48 × (205 × 103 ) × (246000 × 104 )

𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 7.64 + 3.492 = 11.132 𝑚𝑚

𝐿 7000
𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐿𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝛿 = = = 35 𝑚𝑚
200 200

𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 < 𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐿𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝛿 → 𝑂𝑘

Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 25 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Beams
13/5/2023 13/5/2023 13/5/2023
Ref.
Group 2 (F=605.05 kN, M=1182.61 kN.m)

Try 610×305×149
From Table of Properties:
D=612.4 mm, T=19.7 mm, t=11.8 mm, b/T=7.74, d/t=45.8,
Sx=4590×103 mm3, Zx=4110×103 mm3, u=0.886, x=32.7
ry=70mm, rx=257mm, Ix=126000×104 mm4
𝑇 = 19.7 > 16 → 𝑃𝑦 = 265 𝑀𝑃𝑎
✓ Section Classification
Table11
275 275
𝜀=√ =√ = 1.019
𝑃𝑦 265
𝐹𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒: 𝑏/𝑇 = 7.74 < 9𝜀
𝑊𝑒𝑏: 𝑑/𝑡 = 45.8 < 80𝜀
∴ 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1 (𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐), 𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚
✓ Check for Shear
4.4.5
𝑑/𝑡 = 45.8 < 70𝜀 → 𝑁𝑜 𝑆ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐵𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔
4.2.3
𝐴𝑣 = 𝐷𝑡 = 612.4 × 11.8 = 7226.32 𝑚𝑚2
𝑃𝑣 = 0.6𝑃𝑦𝐴𝑣 = 0.6 × 265 × 7226.32 = 1148.98 𝑘𝑁
𝑃𝑣 > 𝐹 → 𝑆ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑘
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 26 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Beams
13/5/2023 13/5/2023 13/5/2023
Ref.
✓ Check for Moment
4.2.5.2 0.6𝑃𝑣 = 0.6 × 1148.98 = 689.39 > 𝐹 → 𝐿𝑜𝑤 𝑆ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟
𝑀𝑐 = 𝑃𝑦𝑆𝑥 = 265 × 4590 × 103 = 1216.35 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
𝑀𝑐 > 𝑀 → 𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑏𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑐

✓ Lateral Torsional Buckling

4.3.6.1 Provide Intermediate Lateral Supports
𝐿𝐸 = 2 𝑚 = 2000 𝑚𝑚
𝐿𝐸 2000
𝜆= = = 28.57
𝑟𝑦 70
𝜆 28.57
= = 0.874
𝑥 32.7
Table19 𝑣 = 0.99
4.3.6.9
𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1 𝑎𝑛𝑑 2 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠, 𝛽𝑤 = 1
4.3.6.7 𝜆𝐿𝑇 = 𝑢𝑣𝜆𝛽1/2 𝑤 = 0.886 × 0.99 × 28.57 × 11/2 = 25.06
Table16
𝑃𝑏 = 265 𝑀𝑃𝑎

4.3.6.4
𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1: 𝑀𝑏 = 𝑃𝑏 × 𝑆𝑥 = 265 × 4590 × 103
= 1216.35 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚

M1 M2 M3 M4 M5

0.5m 0.5m 0.5m 0.5m

Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 27 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Beams
13/5/2023 13/5/2023 13/5/2023
Ref.
22
𝑀1 = 595.5 × 2 − 5.6 × = 1179.8 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
2
2.52
𝑀2 = 595.5 × 2.5 − 5.6 × − 578.73 × 0.5 = 1181.89 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
2
𝑀3 = 1182.61 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
2.52
𝑀4 = 595.5 × 2.5 − 5.6 × − 578.73 × 0.5 = 1181.89 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
2

22
𝑀5 = 595.5 × 2 − 5.6 × = 1179.8 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
2

0.15𝑀2 + 0.5𝑀3 + 0.15𝑀4

𝑚𝐿𝑇 = 0.2 +
Table18
𝑀𝑚𝑎𝑥
0.15(1181.89) + 0.5(1182.61) + 0.15(1181.89)
𝑚𝐿𝑇 = 0.2 +
1182.61

𝑚𝐿𝑇 = 0.9998

𝑀𝑏 1216.35
= = 1216.59
𝑚𝐿𝑇 0.9998

𝑀𝑥 = 1182.61
4.3.6.2 𝑀𝑏
𝑀𝑥 <
𝑚𝐿𝑇

∴ 𝑜𝑘, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔.

Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 28 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Beams
13/5/2023 13/5/2023 13/5/2023
Ref.
✓ Deflection Check
5 × 𝑤 × 𝐿4
𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝑈𝐷𝐿) =
384 × 𝐸 × 𝐼
5 × 3.5 × (6000)4
= = 0.2286 𝑚𝑚
384 × (205 × 103 ) × (246000 × 104 )

W×a
𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑𝑠) = (3𝐿2 − 4𝑎 2 )
24 × 𝐸 × 𝐼
361.6875 × 103 × 3000
= 3 4
(3 × 60002 − 4 × 30002 )
24 × (205 × 10 ) × (126000 × 10 )
= 12.602𝑚𝑚

𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 0.2286 + 12.602 = 12.831 𝑚𝑚

𝐿 6000
𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐿𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝛿 = = = 30 𝑚𝑚
200 200

𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 < 𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐿𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝛿 → 𝑂𝑘

Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 29 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Beams
13/5/2023 13/5/2023 13/5/2023
Ref.
Group 3 (F=1200.11 kN, M=2340.05 kN.m)

Try 838×292×226
From Table of Properties:
D=850.9 mm, T=26.8 mm, t=16.1 mm, b/T=5.48, d/t=47.3,
Sx=9160×103 mm3, Zx=7990×103 mm3, u=0.869, x=35
ry=62.7mm, rx=343mm, Ix=340000×104 mm4
𝑇 = 26.8 > 16 → 𝑃𝑦 = 265 𝑀𝑃𝑎
✓ Section Classification
Table11

275 275
𝜀=√ =√ = 1.019
𝑃𝑦 265
𝐹𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒: 𝑏/𝑇 = 5.48 < 9𝜀
𝑊𝑒𝑏: 𝑑/𝑡 = 47.3 < 80𝜀
∴ 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1 (𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐), 𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚
✓ Check for Shear
4.4.5
𝑑/𝑡 = 47.3 < 70𝜀 → 𝑁𝑜 𝑆ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐵𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔
4.2.3 𝐴𝑣 = 𝐷𝑡 = 850.9 × 16.1 = 13699.49 𝑚𝑚2
𝑃𝑣 = 0.6𝑃𝑦𝐴𝑣 = 0.6 × 265 × 13699.49 = 2178.22 𝑘𝑁
𝑃𝑣 > 𝐹 → 𝑆ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑘
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 30 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Beams
13/5/2023 13/5/2023 13/5/2023
Ref. ✓ Check for Moment
0.6𝑃𝑣 = 0.6 × 2178.22 = 1306.93 < 𝐹 → 𝐻𝑖𝑔ℎ 𝑆ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟
4.2.5.3 𝑀𝑐 = 𝑃𝑦(𝑆𝑥 − 𝜌𝑆𝑣)
2 2
𝐹𝑣 1200.11
𝜌 = [2 ( ) − 1] = [2 ( ) − 1] = 0.01
𝑃𝑣 2178.22
𝑡 16.1
𝑆𝑣 = 𝐷 2 × = 850.92 × = 2914224.01 𝑚𝑚3
4 4
3
4.3.6.1 𝑀𝑐 = 265(9160 × 10 − 0.01 × 2914224.01) = 2419.7 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
𝑀𝑐 > 𝑀 → 𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑏𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑐
✓ Lateral Torsional Buckling
Provide Intermediate Lateral Supports
𝐿𝐸 = 2 𝑚 = 2000 𝑚𝑚
𝐿𝐸 2000
𝜆= = = 31.898
𝑟𝑦 62.7
𝜆 31.898
= = 0.91137
Table19
𝑥 35
4.3.6.9 𝑣 = 0.99
𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1 𝑎𝑛𝑑 2 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠, 𝛽𝑤 = 1
4.3.6.7
𝜆𝐿𝑇 = 𝑢𝑣𝜆𝛽1/2 𝑤 = 0.869 × 0.99 × 31.898 × 11/2 = 27.44
Table16

𝑃𝑏 = 265 𝑀𝑃𝑎
4.3.6.4
𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1: 𝑀𝑏 = 𝑃𝑏 × 𝑆𝑥 = 265 × 9160 × 103
= 2427.4 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚

0.5m 0.5m 0.5m 0.5m

Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 31 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Beams
13/5/2023 13/5/2023 13/5/2023
Ref.
22
𝑀1 = 1174.22 × 2 − 5.6 × = 2283.24 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
2
2.52
𝑀2 = 1174.22 × 2.5 − 5.6 × − 1157.5 × 0.5 = 2339.3 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
2
𝑀3 = 2340.05 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
2.52
𝑀4 = 1174.22 × 2.5 − 5.6 × − 1157.5 × 0.5 = 2339.3 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
2
22
𝑀5 = 1174.22 × 2 − 5.6 × = 2283.24 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
2

0.15𝑀2 + 0.5𝑀3 + 0.15𝑀4

𝑚𝐿𝑇 = 0.2 +
Table18 𝑀𝑚𝑎𝑥
0.15(2339.3) + 0.5(2340.05) + 0.15(2339.3)
𝑚𝐿𝑇 = 0.2 +
2340.05

𝑚𝐿𝑇 = 0.9999
𝑀𝑏
𝑀𝑥 <
𝑚𝐿𝑇

𝑀𝑏 2427.4
= = 2427.63
4.3.6.2
𝑚𝐿𝑇 0.9999

𝑀𝑥 = 𝟐𝟑𝟒𝟎. 𝟎𝟓
∴ 𝑜𝑘, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔.
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 32 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Beams
13/5/2023 13/5/2023 13/5/2023
Ref.
✓ Deflection Check
5 × 𝑤 × 𝐿4
𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝑈𝐷𝐿) =
384 × 𝐸 × 𝐼
5 × 3.5 × (6000)4
= = 0.085 𝑚𝑚
384 × (205 × 103 ) × (340000 × 104 )

W×a
𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑𝑠) = (3𝐿2 − 4𝑎 2 )
24 × 𝐸 × 𝐼
723.4375 × 103 × 3000
= 3 4
(3 × 60002 − 4 × 30002 )
24 × (205 × 10 ) × (126000 × 10 )
= 25.207𝑚𝑚

𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 0.085 + 25.207 = 25.292 𝑚𝑚

𝐿 6000
𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐿𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝛿 = = = 30 𝑚𝑚
200 200

𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 < 𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐿𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝛿 → 𝑂𝑘

Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 33 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Columns
14/5/2023 14/5/2023 14/5/2023
Ref.
7.0 Design of Columns
Group 1 (F = 1824.935 kN)
Try 254×254×107
Ag= 13600 mm2, T= 20.5 mm, t= 12.8 mm, b/T= 6.31, d/t= 15.6,
rx= 113 mm, ry= 65.9 mm, Steel grade= 275, LE= 6000 mm,
Pyflange= 265 MPa, Pyweb= 275 MPa, Py=265 MPa

✓ Section Classification
275 275
Table11 𝜀=√ =√ = 1.019
𝑃𝑦 265

𝐹𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒: 𝑏/𝑇 = 7.74 < 9𝜀 → 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1

𝐹 1824.935 × 103
3.5.5 𝑟2 = = = 0.488
𝐴𝑔 × 𝑃𝑦𝑤𝑒𝑏 13600 × 275
120𝜀 120 × 1.019
= = 61.867
1 + 2𝑟2 1 + 2 × 0.488
𝑊𝑒𝑏: (𝑑/𝑡 = 15.6) < 61.867 > 40𝜀 → 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 3
𝐿𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚
Project: Main Structural SystemBy: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage FlooringAhmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 34 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Columns
14/5/2023 14/5/2023 14/5/2023
Ref.
✓ Slenderness Ratio
𝐿𝐸𝑥 6000
𝜆𝑥 = = = 53.097
𝑟𝑥 113
4.7.2
𝑇𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 23 → 𝑇𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 24 (𝑏) → 𝑝𝑐 = 224.35 𝑀𝑃𝑎
Table23

Table24
𝐿𝐸𝑦 6000
𝜆𝑦 = = = 91.047
𝑟𝑦 65.9
𝑇𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 23 → 𝑇𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 24 (𝑐) → 𝑝𝑐 = 137.57 𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑃𝑐 = 𝐴𝑔 × 𝑝𝑐 = 13600 × 137.57 = 1870.952 𝑘𝑁
4.7.4
𝑃𝑐 > (𝐹 = 1824.935 𝑘𝑁) → 𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑆𝑎𝑓𝑒
𝑃𝑐 < (1.2𝐹 = 2189.92 𝑘𝑁) → 𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝐸𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑐
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 35 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Columns
14/5/2023 14/5/2023 14/5/2023
Ref.
Group 2 (F = 3918.357 kN)
Try 368×368×177
Ag= 22600 mm2, T= 23.8 mm, t= 14.4 mm, b/T= 7.83, d/t= 20.2,
rx= 159 mm, ry= 95.4 mm, Steel grade= 275, LE= 6000 mm,
Pyflange= 265 MPa, Pyweb= 275 MPa, Py=265 MPa

✓ Section Classification
275 275
𝜀=√ =√ = 1.019
𝑃𝑦 265
Table11

𝐹𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒: 𝑏/𝑇 = 7.83 < 9𝜀 → 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1

𝐹 3918.357 × 103
3.5.5 𝑟2 = = = 0.63
𝐴𝑔 × 𝑃𝑦𝑤𝑒𝑏 22600 × 275
120𝜀 120 × 1.019
= = 54.068
1 + 2𝑟2 1 + 2 × 0.63
𝑊𝑒𝑏: (𝑑/𝑡 = 20.2) < 54.068 > 40𝜀 → 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 3
𝐿𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 36 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Columns
14/5/2023 14/5/2023 14/5/2023
Ref.
✓ Slenderness Ratio
𝐿𝐸𝑥 6000
𝜆𝑥 = = = 37.736
𝑟𝑥 159
4.7.2
𝑇𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 23 → 𝑇𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 24 (𝑏) → 𝑝𝑐 = 243.72 𝑀𝑃𝑎
Table23
𝐿𝐸𝑦 6000
Table24 𝜆𝑦 = = = 62.893
𝑟𝑦 95.4
𝑇𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 23 → 𝑇𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 24 (𝑐) → 𝑝𝑐 = 189.66 𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑃𝑐 = 𝐴𝑔 × 𝑝𝑐 = 22600 × 189.66 = 4286.316 𝑘𝑁
4.7.4
𝑃𝑐 > (𝐹 = 3918.357 𝑘𝑁) → 𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑆𝑎𝑓𝑒
𝑃𝑐 < (1.2𝐹 = 4702.03 𝑘𝑁) → 𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝐸𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑐
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 37 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Columns
14/5/2023 14/5/2023 14/5/2023
Ref.
Group 3 (F = 7738.634 kN)
Try 356×406×393
Ag= 50100 mm2, T= 49.2 mm, t= 30.6 mm, b/T= 4.14, d/t= 9.48,
rx= 171 mm, ry= 105 mm, Steel grade= 275, LE= 6000 mm,
Pyflange= 255 MPa, Pyweb= 265 MPa, Py=255 MPa

✓ Section Classification
275 275
𝜀=√ =√ = 1.038
𝑃𝑦 255
Table11

𝐹𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒: 𝑏/𝑇 = 4.14 < 9𝜀 → 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1

𝐹 7738.634 × 103
3.5.5 𝑟2 = = = 0.583
𝐴𝑔 × 𝑃𝑦𝑤𝑒𝑏 50100 × 265
120𝜀 120 × 1.019
= = 57.540
1 + 2𝑟2 1 + 2 × 0.583
𝑊𝑒𝑏: (𝑑/𝑡 = 9.48) < 57.540 > 40𝜀 → 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 3
𝐿𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 38 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Design of Columns
14/5/2023 14/5/2023 14/5/2023
Ref.
✓ Slenderness Ratio
𝐿𝐸𝑥 6000
𝜆𝑥 = = = 35.088
𝑟𝑥 171
4.7.2 𝑇𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 23 → 𝑇𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 24 (𝑐) → 𝑝𝑐 = 229.86 𝑀𝑃𝑎
Table23 𝐿𝐸𝑦 6000
𝜆𝑦 = = = 57.143
Table24 𝑟𝑦 105
𝑇𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 23 → 𝑇𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 24 (𝑑 ) → 𝑝𝑐 = 176.71 𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑃𝑐 = 𝐴𝑔 × 𝑝𝑐 = 50100 × 176.71 = 8853.17 𝑘𝑁
4.7.4
𝑃𝑐 > (𝐹 = 7738.634 𝑘𝑁) → 𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑆𝑎𝑓𝑒
𝑃𝑐 < (1.2𝐹 = 9286.361 𝑘𝑁) → 𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝐸𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑐
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 39 of 60
Description: Design of Date: Date: Date:
Baseplates 14/5/2023 14/5/2023 14/5/2023
Ref.
8.0 Design of Baseplates
𝑩𝒂𝒔𝒆𝒑𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒄𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒎𝒏𝒔 𝑮𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒑 𝟏 ∶ (𝟐𝟓𝟒 × 𝟐𝟓𝟒 × 𝟏𝟎𝟕) 𝑼𝑪
𝐷 = 266.7 𝑚𝑚 , 𝐵 = 258.8 𝑚𝑚 , 𝑡 = 12.8 𝑚𝑚 , 𝑇 = 20.5 𝑚𝑚
𝑓𝑐𝑢 = 25 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2 , 𝐹𝑐 = 1824.935 𝑘𝑁 , 𝑃𝑦 = 265 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
𝐹𝑐 1824.935 × 1000
4.13.2.1 𝐴𝑏𝑒 = = = 121.66 × 103 𝑚𝑚2
0.6 × 𝑓𝑐𝑢 0.6 × 25
𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒 (500 × 500 𝑚𝑚2 ) 𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒
𝐴𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒 = 250 × 103 𝑚𝑚2 > 𝐴𝑏𝑒 = 121.66 × 103 𝑚𝑚2
𝐴𝑏𝑒 = (𝐷 + 2𝑐)(𝐵 + 2𝑐) − (𝐷 − 2𝑐 − 2𝑇 )(𝐵 + 2𝑐 − 𝑡 − 2𝑐)
Fig.15
121.66 × 103
= (266.7 + 2𝑐)(258.8 + 2𝑐)
− (266.7 − 2𝑐 − 2 × 20.5)(258.8 + 2𝑐 − 12.8 − 2𝑐)
𝑐 = 60.58 𝑚𝑚
𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒 = 𝐷 + 2𝑐 = 266.7 + 2 × 60.58
= 387.86 𝑚𝑚2 < 500 𝑚𝑚 𝑂𝑘
𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒 = 𝐵 + 2𝑐 = 258.8 + 2 × 60.58
= 379.96 𝑚𝑚2 < 500 𝑚𝑚 𝑂𝑘
Table9 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 (16 𝑚𝑚 < 𝑡𝑝 < 40 𝑚𝑚) → 𝑃𝑦 = 265 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
𝜔 = 0.6 × 𝑓𝑐𝑢 = 0.6 × 25 = 15 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
0.5
4.13.2.2 3𝜔 3 × 15 0.5
𝑡𝑃 = 𝑐 [ ] = 60.58 [ ] = 24.96 𝑚𝑚
𝑃𝑦 265
So, 500 mm×500 mm ×30 mm thick baseplate in grade S275 steel
should be suitable.
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 40 of 60
Description: Design of Date: Date: Date:
Baseplates 14/5/2023 14/5/2023 14/5/2023
Ref.
𝑩𝒂𝒔𝒆𝒑𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒄𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒎𝒏𝒔 𝑮𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒑 𝟐 ∶ (𝟑𝟓𝟔 × 𝟑𝟔𝟖 × 𝟏𝟕𝟕) 𝑼𝑪
𝐷 = 368.2 𝑚𝑚 , 𝐵 = 372.6 𝑚𝑚 , 𝑡 = 14.4 𝑚𝑚 , 𝑇 = 23.8 𝑚𝑚
𝑓𝑐𝑢 = 25 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2 , 𝐹𝑐 = 3918.357 𝑘𝑁 , 𝑃𝑦 = 265 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
𝐹𝑐 3918.357 × 1000
𝐴𝑏𝑒 = = = 261.22 × 103 𝑚𝑚2
4.13.2.1 0.6 × 𝑓𝑐𝑢 0.6 × 25
𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒 (600 × 600 𝑚𝑚2 ) 𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒
𝐴𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒 = 360 × 103 𝑚𝑚2 > 𝐴𝑏𝑒 = 261.22 × 103 𝑚𝑚2
𝐴𝑏𝑒 = (𝐷 + 2𝑐)(𝐵 + 2𝑐) − (𝐷 − 2𝑐 − 2𝑇 )(𝐵 + 2𝑐 − 𝑡 − 2𝑐)
Fig.15
261.22 × 103
= (368.2 + 2𝑐)(372.6 + 2𝑐)
− (368.2 − 2𝑐 − 2 × 23.8)(372.6 + 2𝑐 − 14.4 − 2𝑐)
𝑐 = 92.95 𝑚𝑚
𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒 = 𝐷 + 2𝑐 = 368.2 + 2 × 92.95
= 554.1 𝑚𝑚2 < 600 𝑚𝑚 𝑂𝑘
𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒 = 𝐵 + 2𝑐 = 372.6 + 2 × 92.95
= 558.5 𝑚𝑚2 < 600 𝑚𝑚 𝑂𝑘
𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 (16 𝑚𝑚 < 𝑡𝑝 < 40 𝑚𝑚) → 𝑃𝑦 = 265 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
Table9
𝜔 = 0.6 × 𝑓𝑐𝑢 = 0.6 × 25 = 15 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
0.5
3𝜔 3 × 15 0.5
4.13.2.2 𝑡𝑃 = 𝑐 [ ] = 92.95 [ ] = 38.3 𝑚𝑚
𝑃𝑦 265
So, 600 mm×600 mm ×40 mm thick baseplate in grade S275 steel
should be suitable.
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 41 of 60
Description: Design of Date: Date: Date:
Baseplates 14/5/2023 14/5/2023 14/5/2023
Ref.
𝑩𝒂𝒔𝒆𝒑𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒄𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒎𝒏𝒔 𝑮𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒑 𝟑 ∶ (𝟑𝟓𝟔 × 𝟒𝟎𝟔 × 𝟑𝟗𝟑) 𝑼𝑪
𝐷𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛:
𝐷 = 419 𝑚𝑚 , 𝐵 = 407 𝑚𝑚 , 𝑡 = 30.6 𝑚𝑚 , 𝑇 = 49.2 𝑚𝑚
𝑓𝑐𝑢 = 25 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2 , 𝐹𝑐 = 7738.634 𝐾𝑁 , 𝑃𝑦 = 255 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
𝐹𝑐 7738.634 × 1000
𝐴𝑏𝑒 = = = 515.91 × 103 𝑚𝑚2
4.13.2.1 0.6 × 𝑓𝑐𝑢 0.6 × 25
𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒 (800 × 800 𝑚𝑚2 ) 𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒
𝐴𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒 = 640 × 103 𝑚𝑚2 > 𝐴𝑏𝑒 = 515.91 × 103 𝑚𝑚2
𝐴𝑏𝑒 = (𝐷 + 2𝑐)(𝐵 + 2𝑐) − (𝐷 − 2𝑐 − 2𝑇 )(𝐵 + 2𝑐 − 𝑡 − 2𝑐)
Fig.15
515.91 × 103
= (419 + 2𝑐)(407 + 2𝑐) − (419 − 2𝑐 − 2 × 49.2)(407
+ 2𝑐 − 30.6 − 2𝑐)
𝑐 = 154.23 𝑚𝑚
𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒 = 𝐷 + 2𝑐 = 419 + 2 × 154.23
= 727.46 𝑚𝑚2 < 800 𝑚𝑚 𝑂𝑘
𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒 = 𝐵 + 2𝑐 = 407 + 2 × 154.23
= 715.46 𝑚𝑚2 < 800 𝑚𝑚 𝑂𝑘

Table9 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 (63 𝑚𝑚 < 𝑡𝑝 ≤ 80 𝑚𝑚) → 𝑃𝑦 = 245 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2

𝜔 = 0.6 × 𝑓𝑐𝑢 = 0.6 × 25 = 15 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
0.5
4.13.2.2
3𝜔 3 × 15 0.5
𝑡𝑃 = 𝑐 [ ] = 154.23 [ ] = 66.1 𝑚𝑚
𝑃𝑦 245
So, 800 mm×800 mm ×70 mm thick baseplate in grade S275 steel
should be suitable.
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 42 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Loads of Bracing
15/5/2023 15/5/2023 15/5/2023
Ref.
9.0 Design of Bracings
9.1 Loads of Bracings
➢ Level 1 section A

BRACING 1: 80.02 KN (Tension)

BRACING 2: -100.93 KN (Compression)
➢ Level 1 section 1

BRACING 5: -96.6 KN (Compression)

BRACING 6: 71.92 KN (Tension)
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 43 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Loads of Bracing
15/5/2023 15/5/2023 15/5/2023
Ref.
➢ Level 2 section A

BRACING 1: 172.61 KN (Tension)

BRACING 2: -189.39 KN (Compression)
BRACING 3: 72.54 KN (Tension)
BRACING 4: -108.29 KN (Compression)
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 44 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Loads of Bracing
15/5/2023 15/5/2023 15/5/2023
Ref.
➢ Level 2 section 1

BRACING 5: -177.91 KN (Compression)

BRACING 6: 159.19 KN (Tension)
BRACING 7: -104.55 KN (Compression)
BRACING 8: 63.88 KN (Compression)
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 45 of 60
Description: Design of Critical Date: Date: Date:
Compression Bracing 15/5/2023 15/5/2023 15/5/2023
Ref.
9.2 Design of Critical Compression Bracing
𝐹 = 189.39 𝑘𝑁, 𝑇𝑟𝑦 150 × 90 × 15
𝑏 𝑑
𝐴𝑔 = 6780 𝑚𝑚2 , = 10 𝑚𝑚 , = 6 𝑚𝑚 , 𝑟𝑥 = 47.4 𝑚𝑚
𝑡 𝑡
𝑟𝑦 = 37.5 𝑚𝑚 , 𝑟𝑣 = 19.3 𝑚𝑚 , 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑠 = 8
✓ Section classification

275 275
Table11 𝜀=√ =√ =1
𝑝𝑦 275

𝑏/𝑡 = 10 𝑚𝑚 < 15𝜀 → 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 3 (𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑖 − 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑡)

(𝑏 + 𝑑 )
= 16 𝑚𝑚 < 24𝜀 → 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 3 (𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑖 − 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑡)
𝑡
𝐿 = √(6000)2 + (6000)2 = 8485.281 𝑚𝑚
0.85 × 𝐿𝑥 0.85 × 8485.281
𝜆𝑥 = = = 152.16
4.7.10.3 𝑟𝑥 47.4
0.85 × 𝐿𝑥 0.85 × 8485.281
𝜆𝑥 = + 30 = + 30 = 182.16
𝑟𝑥 47.4
𝐿𝐸 8485.281
𝐿𝑣 = = = 942.809 𝑚𝑚
𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑠 + 1 8+1
Table25 𝐿𝑣 942.809
𝜆𝑐 = = = 48.85 < 50 𝑂𝐾
𝑟𝑣 19.3
2 0.5 0.5
𝐿𝑦 8485.281 2
𝜆𝑦 = [( ) + (𝜆𝑐 )2 ] = [( ) + (48.85)2 ] = 231.487
𝑟𝑦 37.5
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 46 of 60
Description: Design of Critical Date: Date: Date:
Compression Bracing 15/5/2023 15/5/2023 15/5/2023
Ref.

𝜆𝑦 = 1.4 × 𝜆𝑐 = 1.4 × 48.85 = 68.39

Table23 𝜆𝑦 = 231.487 𝑖𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 ℎ𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑡 → 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 23 → 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 24 (𝑐)
Table24
𝑝𝑐 = 31.70 𝑀𝑃𝑎

4.7.4
𝑃𝑐 = 𝐴𝑔 × 𝑝𝑐 = 6780 × 31.70 = 214.926 𝑘𝑁
𝑃𝑐 > (𝐹 = 189.39 𝑘𝑁) → 𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑆𝑎𝑓𝑒
𝑃𝑐 < (1.2𝐹 = 227.27 𝑘𝑁) → 𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝐸𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑐
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 47 of 60
Description: Design of Critical Date: Date: Date:
Tension Bracing 15/5/2023 15/5/2023 15/5/2023
Ref.
9.3 Design of Critical Tension Bracing
𝐹 = 172.61 𝑘𝑁, 𝑇𝑟𝑦 150 × 90 × 15 (𝐷𝑜𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝐴𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒𝑠)
𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 2 𝑏𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑠, 22 𝑚𝑚, 1 𝑏𝑜𝑙𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝑒𝑎𝑐ℎ 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒
𝐴𝑔 = 6780 𝑚𝑚2 , 𝑡 = 15 𝑚𝑚 𝑑 = 22 𝑚𝑚 , 𝐷𝑡 = 24 𝑚𝑚 ,
𝑆275 , 𝑝𝑦 = 275 𝑁 ∕ 𝑚𝑚2 , 𝑘𝑒 = 1.2
4.6.3 𝐴𝑔 = 𝑎1 + 𝑎2
𝑎1 = 150 × 15 × 2 = 4500 𝑚𝑚2
𝑎2 = 𝐴𝑔 − 𝑎1 = 6780 − 4500 = 2280 𝑚𝑚2
3.4.2
𝑎1𝑛 = 𝑎1 − 1 × 𝐷𝑡 × 𝑡 = 4500 − 2 × (1 × 24 × 15)
= 3780 𝑚𝑚2
3.4.3 𝑎1𝑒 = 𝑘𝑒 × 𝑎1𝑛 = 1.2 × 3780 = 4536 𝑚𝑚2
𝑎2𝑛 = 𝑎2𝑒 = 𝑎2 = 2280 𝑚𝑚2
𝐴𝑒 = 𝑎1𝑒 + 𝑎2𝑒 = 4536 + 2280 = 6816 𝑚𝑚2
4.6.3.2 𝑃𝑡 = 𝑝𝑦 × (𝐴𝑒 − 0.25 × 𝑎2 ) = 275 × (6816 − 0.25 × 2280)
𝑃𝑡 = 1717.65 𝐾𝑁 > (𝐹 = 172.61 𝑘𝑁) → 𝑂𝐾
∴ 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 48 of 60
Description: Beam to Beam Date: Date: Date:
Connection 22/5/2023 22/5/2023 22/5/2023
Ref.
10.0 Design of Connections
10.1 Beam to Beam Connection
Assume S275, Grade 4.6, M20, 2 mm clearance holes.
F = 496.05 kN (Beam 2), Use Double Angle 80×80×8

Table9 275
(t < 16 → Py = 275 MPa → 𝜀 = √ = 1)
Table11 𝑃𝑦

𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒 = 496.05/2 = 248.025 𝑘𝑁

Table33
𝐷𝑡 = 20 + 2 = 22 𝑚𝑚

6.2.1.1
𝑆𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 2.5𝑑 = 2.5(20) = 50 𝑚𝑚
6.2.1.2 𝑆𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 14𝑡 = 14(8) = 112 𝑚𝑚
𝑆𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 = 80 𝑚𝑚

Table29
𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 1.25𝐷 = 1.25(22) = 27.5 𝑚𝑚
6.2.2.5 𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 11𝜀𝑡 = 11(1)(8) = 88 𝑚𝑚
𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 = 40 𝑚𝑚

6.3.1 𝐴𝑠 = 𝐴𝑡 = 245 𝑚𝑚2

Table30 𝑝𝑠 = 160 𝑀𝑃𝑎
6.3.2.1
𝑃𝑠 = 𝐴𝑠 × 𝑝𝑠 = 2 × 245 × 160 = 78.4 𝑘𝑁
Table31 𝑝𝑏𝑏 = 460 𝑀𝑃𝑎
6.3.3.2 𝑃𝑏𝑏 = 𝑑 × 𝑡𝑝 × 𝑝𝑏𝑏 = 20 × 8 × 460 = 73.6 𝑘𝑁
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 49 of 60
Description: Beam to Beam Date: Date: Date:
Connection 22/5/2023 22/5/2023 22/5/2023
Ref.
6.3.3.3
𝐾𝑏𝑠 = 1
Table32 𝑝𝑏𝑠 = 460
𝑃𝑏𝑠 = 𝐾𝑏𝑠 × 𝑑 × 𝑡𝑝 × 𝑝𝑏𝑠 = 1 × 20 × 8 × 460 = 73.6 𝑘𝑁
0.5𝐾𝑏𝑠 × 𝑒 × 𝑡𝑝 × 𝑝𝑏𝑠 = 0.5 × 1 × 40 × 8 × 460 = 73.6 𝑘𝑁 ≥ 𝑃𝑏𝑠
𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑖𝑠 𝑃𝑏𝑏 = 𝑃𝑏𝑠 = 73.6 𝑘𝑁
248.025
𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑠 = = 3.37 ≈ 4 𝑏𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑠
73.6
4.2.3 𝐴𝑣 = 𝐷 × 𝑡𝑝 = 834.9 × 8 = 6679.2 𝑚𝑚2
3.4.2 𝐴𝑣,𝑛𝑒𝑡 = 6679.2 − 4 × 22 × 8 = 5975.2 𝑚𝑚2
3.4.3
𝑆275 → 𝐾𝑒 = 1.2
6.2.3 𝐴𝑣 6679.2
0.85 × = 0.85 × = 5566 𝑚𝑚2
𝐾𝑒 1.2
𝐴𝑣
𝐴𝑣,𝑛𝑒𝑡 > 0.85 ×
𝐾𝑒
𝑃𝑣 = 0.6 × 𝑃𝑦 × 𝐴𝑣 = 0.6 × 265 × 6679.2 = 1061.99 𝑘𝑁 > 𝐹 → 𝑜𝑘
𝐿𝑣 = 287𝑚𝑚
Fig.22

6.2.4 𝑃𝑟 = 0.6 × 𝑃𝑦 × 𝑡[𝐿𝑣 + 𝐾𝑒 (𝐿𝑡 − 𝑘 × 𝐷𝑡 )]

𝑃𝑟 = 0.6 × 265 × 8[400 + 1.2(47 − 0.5 × 22)]=563.75kN > 𝐹 → 𝑜𝑘
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 50 of 60
Description: Beam to Column Date: Date: Date:
Connection 22/5/2023 22/5/2023 22/5/2023
Ref.
10.2 Beam to Column Connection
Assume S275, Grade 4.6, M20, 2 mm clearance holes.
F = 1200.11 kN (Girder 4), Use Double Angle 120×120×12

Table9
275
(t < 16 → Py = 275 MPa → 𝜀 = √ = 1)
Table11 𝑃𝑦

1200.11
𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒 = = 600.055 𝑘𝑁
Table33
2
𝑆𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 2.5𝑑 = 2.5(20) = 50 𝑚𝑚
6.2.1.1 𝑆𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 14𝑡 = 14(12) = 168 𝑚𝑚
6.2.1.2
𝑆𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 = 80 𝑚𝑚
𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 1.25𝐷 = 1.25(22) = 27.5 𝑚𝑚
Table29 𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 11𝜀𝑡 = 11(1)(12) = 132 𝑚𝑚
6.2.2.5
𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 = 40 𝑚𝑚
𝐷𝑡 = 20 + 2 = 22 𝑚𝑚
6.3.1
𝐴𝑠 = 𝐴𝑡 = 245 𝑚𝑚2
Table30

6.3.2.1
𝑝𝑠 = 160 𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑃𝑠 = 𝐴𝑠 × 𝑝𝑠 = 2 × 245 × 160 = 78.4 𝑘𝑁
Table31
𝑝𝑏𝑏 = 460 𝑀𝑃𝑎
6.3.3.2
𝑃𝑏𝑏 = 𝑑 × 𝑡𝑝 × 𝑝𝑏𝑏 = 20 × 12 × 460 = 110.4 𝑘𝑁
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 51 of 60
Description: Beam to Column Date: Date: Date:
Connection 22/5/2023 22/5/2023 22/5/2023
Ref.
6.3.3.3 𝐾𝑏𝑠 = 1
Table32 𝑝𝑏𝑠 = 460
𝑃𝑏𝑠 = 𝐾𝑏𝑠 × 𝑑 × 𝑡𝑝 × 𝑝𝑏𝑠 = 1 × 20 × 12 × 460 = 110.4 𝑘𝑁
0.5𝐾𝑏𝑠 × 𝑒 × 𝑡𝑝 × 𝑝𝑏𝑠 = 0.5 × 1 × 40 × 12 × 460 = 110.4 𝑘𝑁 ≥ 𝑃𝑏𝑠
𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑖𝑠 𝑃𝑠 = 78.4 𝑘𝑁
600.055
𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑠 = = 7.65 ≈ 8 𝑏𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑠
78.4
4.2.3 𝐴𝑣 = 𝐷 × 𝑡𝑝 = 850.9 × 12 = 10210.8 𝑚𝑚2
3.4.2
𝐴𝑣,𝑛𝑒𝑡 = 10210.8 − 8 × 22 × 12 = 8098.8 𝑚𝑚2
3.4.3
𝑆275 → 𝐾𝑒 = 1.2
6.2.3 𝐴𝑣 10210.2
0.85 × = 0.85 × = 7232.225 𝑚𝑚2
𝐾𝑒 1.2
𝐴𝑣
𝐴𝑣,𝑛𝑒𝑡 > 0.85 ×
𝐾𝑒
𝑃𝑣 = 0.6 × 𝑃𝑦 × 𝐴𝑣 = 0.6 × 265 × 8508.5 = 1352.85 𝑘𝑁 > 𝐹 → 𝑜𝑘

Fig.22
𝐿𝑣 = 673𝑚𝑚
6.2.4 𝑃𝑟 = 0.6 × 265 × 12[673 + 1.2(47 − 0.5 × 22)]=1366.5 > 𝐹 → 𝑜𝑘
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 52 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Bracing Connection
22/5/2023 22/5/2023 22/5/2023
Ref.
10.3 Bracing Connection
Assume S275, Grade 4.6, M20, 2 mm clearance holes.
F = 189.39 kN (Beam 2), Use Double Angle 50×50×4

Table9
275
(t < 16 → Py = 275 MPa → 𝜀 = √ = 1)
Table11 𝑃𝑦

189.39
𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒 = = 94.695 𝑘𝑁
Table33
2
𝑆𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 2.5𝑑 = 2.5(20) = 50 𝑚𝑚
6.2.1.1 𝑆𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 14𝑡 = 14(4) = 56 𝑚𝑚
6.2.1.2
𝑆𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 = 80 𝑚𝑚
𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 1.25𝐷 = 1.25(22) = 27.5 𝑚𝑚
Table29 𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 11𝜀𝑡 = 11(1)(4) = 44 𝑚𝑚
6.2.2.5
𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 = 40 𝑚𝑚
𝐷𝑡 = 20 + 2 = 22 𝑚𝑚
6.3.1
𝐴𝑠 = 𝐴𝑡 = 245 𝑚𝑚2
Table30

6.3.2.1
𝑝𝑠 = 160 𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑃𝑠 = 𝐴𝑠 × 𝑝𝑠 = 2 × 245 × 160 = 78.4 𝑘𝑁
Table31
𝑝𝑏𝑏 = 460 𝑀𝑃𝑎
6.3.3.2
𝑃𝑏𝑏 = 𝑑 × 𝑡𝑝 × 𝑝𝑏𝑏 = 20 × 4 × 460 = 36.8 𝑘𝑁
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 53 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Bracing Connection
22/5/2023 22/5/2023 22/5/2023
Ref.
6.3.3.3 𝐾𝑏𝑠 = 1
Table32 𝑝𝑏𝑠 = 460
𝑃𝑏𝑠 = 𝐾𝑏𝑠 × 𝑑 × 𝑡𝑝 × 𝑝𝑏𝑠 = 1 × 20 × 4 × 460 = 36.8 𝑘𝑁
0.5𝐾𝑏𝑠 × 𝑒 × 𝑡𝑝 × 𝑝𝑏𝑠 = 0.5 × 1 × 40 × 4 × 460 = 36.8 𝑘𝑁 ≥ 𝑃𝑏𝑠
𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑖𝑠 𝑃𝑏𝑏 = 𝑃𝑏𝑠 = 36.8 𝑘𝑁
94.695
𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑠 = = 2.57 ≈ 3 𝑏𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑠
36.8
4.2.3 𝐴𝑣 = 𝐷 × 𝑡𝑝 = 834.9 × 4 = 3339.6𝑚𝑚2
3.4.2
𝐴𝑣,𝑛𝑒𝑡 = 3339.6 − 3 × 22 × 4 = 3075.6 𝑚𝑚2
3.4.3
𝑆275 → 𝐾𝑒 = 1.2
6.2.3 𝐴𝑣 3339.6
0.85 × = 0.85 × = 2365.55 𝑚𝑚2
𝐾𝑒 1.2
𝐴𝑣
𝐴𝑣,𝑛𝑒𝑡 > 0.85 ×
𝐾𝑒
𝑃𝑣 = 0.6 × 𝑃𝑦 × 𝐴𝑣 = 0.6 × 265 × 3339.6 = 530.99 𝑘𝑁 > 𝐹 → 𝑜𝑘

Fig.22
𝐿𝑣 = 300𝑚𝑚
6.2.4 𝑃𝑟 = 0.6 × 265 × 4[300 + 1.2(47 − 0.5 × 22)]=218.27kN > 𝐹 → 𝑜𝑘
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 54 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Bill of Materials
23/5/2023 23/5/2023 23/5/2023
Ref.
11.0 Bill of Materials
BOM for beams design (Group 1):
𝑼𝑩 𝟖𝟑𝟖 × 𝟐𝟗𝟐 × 𝟏𝟕𝟔
𝐹𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 = 175.9 𝐾𝑔 ∕ 𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ𝑠 × 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑠 = 7 × 37 = 259 𝑚
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝐾𝑔) = 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 × 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 175.9 × 259
= 45558.1 𝐾𝑔
45558.1
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠) = = 45.558 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠
1000

BOM for girder design (Group 2):

𝑼𝑩 𝟔𝟏𝟎 × 𝟑𝟎𝟓 × 𝟏𝟒𝟗
𝐹𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 = 149.2 𝐾𝑔 ∕ 𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ𝑠 × 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑔𝑖𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠 = 2 × 12
= 24 𝑚
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝐾𝑔) = 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 × 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 149.2 × 24
= 3580.8 𝐾𝑔
3580.8
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠) = = 3.581 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠
1000
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 55 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Bill of Materials
23/5/2023 23/5/2023 23/5/2023
Ref.
BOM for girder design (Group 3):
𝑼𝑩 𝟖𝟑𝟖 × 𝟐𝟗𝟐 × 𝟐𝟐𝟔
𝐹𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 = 226.5 𝐾𝑔 ∕ 𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ𝑠 × 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑔𝑖𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠 = 2 × 9
= 18 𝑚
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝐾𝑔) = 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 × 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ
= 226.5 × 18 = 4077 𝐾𝑔
4077
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠) = = 4.077 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠
1000

BOM for Columns design (Group 1):

𝑼𝑪 𝟐𝟓𝟒 × 𝟐𝟓𝟒 × 𝟏𝟎𝟕
𝐹𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 = 107.1 𝐾𝑔 ∕ 𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ𝑠 × 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛𝑠 = 6 × 5
= 30 𝑚
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝐾𝑔) = 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 × 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ
= 107.1 × 30 = 3213 𝐾𝑔
3213
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠) = = 3.213 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠
1000
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 56 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Bill of Materials
23/5/2023 23/5/2023 23/5/2023
Ref.
BOM for Columns design (Group 2):
𝑼𝑪 𝟑𝟓𝟔 × 𝟑𝟔𝟖 × 𝟏𝟕𝟕
𝐹𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 = 177 𝐾𝑔 ∕ 𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ𝑠 × 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛𝑠 = 12 × 7
= 84 𝑚
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝐾𝑔) = 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 × 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 177 × 84
= 14868 𝐾𝑔
14868
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠) = = 14.868 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠
1000

BOM for Columns design (Group 3):

𝑼𝑪 𝟑𝟓𝟔 × 𝟒𝟎𝟔 × 𝟑𝟗𝟑
𝐹𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 = 393 𝐾𝑔 ∕ 𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ𝑠 × 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛𝑠 = 12 × 2
= 24 𝑚
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝐾𝑔) = 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 × 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 393 × 24
= 9432 𝐾𝑔
9432
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠) = = 9.432 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠
1000
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd 57 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Bill of Materials
23/5/2023 23/5/2023 23/5/2023
Ref.
BOM for Columns base plate design (Group 1):
𝑼𝑪 𝟓𝟎𝟎 × 𝟓𝟎𝟎 × 𝟑𝟎
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ𝑠 × 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛𝑠 = 6 × 5
= 30 𝑚
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝐾𝑔) = 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 × 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 30 × 30
= 900 𝐾𝑔
900
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠) = = 0.9 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠
1000
BOM for Columns base plate design (Group 2):
𝑼𝑪 𝟔𝟎𝟎 × 𝟔𝟎𝟎 × 𝟒𝟎
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ𝑠 × 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛𝑠 = 12 × 7
= 84 𝑚
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝐾𝑔) = 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 × 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 40 × 84
= 3360 𝐾𝑔
3360
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠) = = 3.36 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠
1000
BOM for Columns base plate design (Group 3):
𝑼𝑪 𝟖𝟎𝟎 × 𝟖𝟎𝟎 × 𝟕𝟎
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ𝑠 × 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛𝑠 = 12 × 2
= 24 𝑚
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝐾𝑔) = 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 × 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 70 × 24
= 1680 𝐾𝑔
1680
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠) = = 1.68 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠
1000
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 58 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Bill of Materials
23/5/2023 23/5/2023 23/5/2023
Ref.
BOM for Bracing:
𝟐 × (𝟏𝟓𝟎 × 𝟗𝟎 × 𝟏𝟓) 𝒅𝒐𝒖𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒍𝒆𝒔
𝐹𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 = 53.2 𝐾𝑔 ∕ 𝑚
𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 = √(6000)2 + (6000)2 = 8485.28 𝑚𝑚
= 8.49 𝑚
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ𝑠 × 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔
= 8.49 × 2 × 8 = 135.84 𝑚
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝐾𝑔) = 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 × 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ
= 53.2 × 135.84 = 7226.688 𝐾𝑔
7226.688
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑖𝑛 (𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠) = = 7.227 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠
1000

Total
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 45.558 + 7.658 + 27.513 + 5.94 + 7.227
= 93.896 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠
𝐴𝑠 𝑖𝑡 𝑔𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑛 𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 10% ∶
= 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 × 0.1 = 93.896 × 0.1 = 9.3896 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠 = 93.896 + 9.3896 = 103.2856 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas Sayed Hashem 59 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Bill of Materials
23/5/2023 23/5/2023 23/5/2023
Ref.
Beams:
Size Total Length (m) Mass (tons)
838 × 292 × 176 259 45.558

Girders:
Size Total Length (m) Mass (tons)
610×305×149 24 3.581
838×292×226 18 4.077

Columns:
Size Total Length (m) Mass (tons)
254×254×107 30 3.213
356×368×177 84 14.868
356×406×393 24 9.432

Columns Base Plate:

Size Total Length (m) Mass (tons)
500×500×30 30 0.9
600×600×40 84 14.868
800×800×70 24 1.68

Bracing:
Size Total Length (m) Mass (tons)
2×(150×90×15) 135.84 7.227

Total Tons:

Total (Tons)
Beams 45.558
Girder 7.658
Columns 27.513
Columns Base Plate 5.94
Bracing 7.227
Total tons before the percentage 10% 93.896
Total tons after the percentage 10% 103.2856
Project: Main Structural System By: Checked: Approved: Sheet No:
of a Warehouse Storage Flooring Sayed Hashem Ahmed Mohd Ahmed Abbas 60 of 60
Date: Date: Date:
Description: Conclusion
23/5/2023 23/5/2023 23/5/2023
Ref.
12.0 Conclusion
To sum up, as we have mentioned on the introduction and through
the details of the design, all the required steps of steel design of main
structural system of a Warehouse storage flooring with configuration has
been done. We have learn many things on this project and gained a lot
of experience on the steel design such as, how to do the load
arrangement both stories 1 and 2, how to make the combination of beam
groups and that was at the beginning but after trying multiple times it
become easy, and also one of the most difficulties that we have face is
that the number of tries in order to choose the best section that can carry
the loads safely and economy without exceeding 20%.