Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/236649845
CITATIONS READS
25 71
6 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Heather Michelle Nicholson Wright on 29 December 2016.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document
and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
Estimating rates of decompression from textures of erupted ash
particles produced by 1999–2006 eruptions of Tungurahua volcano,
Ecuador
Heather M.N. Wright1, Katharine V. Cashman2, Patricia A. Mothes3, Minard L. Hall3, Andrés Gorki Ruiz3,
and Jean-Luc Le Pennec4
1
U.S. Geological Survey, MS 910, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA
2
Department of Geological Sciences, 1272 University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USA
3
Instituto Geofìsico, Escuela Politècnica Nacional, Apartado 2759, Quito, Ecuador
4
IRD, R 163, Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans, 5 rue Kessler, 63038 Clermont-Ferrand cedex, France
ABSTRACT (e.g., Geschwind and Rutherford, 1995; Hammer and Rutherford, 2002).
Persistent low- to moderate-level eruptive activity of andesitic Eruption models that incorporate estimates of changing crystal and bub-
volcanoes is difficult to monitor because small changes in magma ble concentrations with magma ascent thus require accurate predictions
supply rates may cause abrupt transitions in eruptive style. As direct of this evolution path (e.g., Melnik and Sparks, 1999; Diller et al., 2006).
measurement of magma supply is not possible, robust techniques for
indirect measurements must be developed. Here we demonstrate that TUNGURAHUA VOLCANO, ECUADOR
crystal textures of ash particles from 1999 to 2006 Vulcanian and Tungurahua is a stratovolcano in the eastern cordillera of Ecuador
Strombolian eruptions of Tungurahua volcano, Ecuador, provide (Fig. 1). The most recent phase of magmatic activity began on 5 October
quantitative information about the dynamics of magma ascent and 1999 (Smithsonian Institution, 2002–2004) and continues to the time of
eruption that is difficult to obtain from other monitoring approaches. this writing. Activity has included gas emissions, Vulcanian and Strombo-
We show that the crystallinity of erupted ash particles is controlled lian eruptions and lava fountains, and sub-Plinian eruptions (Arellano et
by the magma supply rate (MSR); ash erupted during periods of high al., 2008); an anomalously large event occurred in August 2006, produc-
magma supply is substantially less crystalline than during periods ing an ash column 17 km high (volcanic explosivity index = 3; Eychenne
of low magma supply. This correlation is most easily explained by et al., 2012). Erupted ash, scoria, and ballistics are andesitic in composi-
efficient degassing at very low pressures (<<50 MPa) and degassing- tion (~58 wt% SiO2), with the exception of minor silicic andesite (~62
driven crystallization controlled by the time available prior to erup- wt% SiO2) erupted in August 2006 (Samaniego et al., 2011). SO2 emis-
tion. Our data also suggest that the observed transition from intermit- sions over this time period have exceeded, by two orders of magnitude,
tent Vulcanian explosions at low MSR to more continuous periods estimates of dissolved sulfur in the erupted magma volume; 90% of these
of Strombolian eruptions and lava fountains at high MSR can be emissions have been through passive degassing (Arellano et al., 2008).
explained by the rise of bubbles through (Strombolian) or trapping Ash emitted from the volcano during all explosive activity records volume
of bubbles beneath (Vulcanian) vent-capping, variably viscous (and accumulations through time (Ruiz et al., 2006; Le Pennec et al., 2012).
crystalline) magma.
INTRODUCTION
A primary goal in volcanology is to understand the relationship
between magma supply rate (MSR) and eruption style. Although recent
Ν
advances in volcano monitoring techniques have greatly improved our
ability to accurately predict where, and sometimes when, volcanic erup-
tions will occur (e.g., Swanson et al., 1983; Sparks, 2003), predicting what
will happen is more difficult, and relies primarily on field studies of past
activity (e.g., Nakada, 2000). Recent studies of ash emitted before (Cash- 2°N
man and Hoblitt, 2004) and during (Taddeucci et al., 2002; Miwa et al.,
2009) eruptions suggest that ash samples may provide important informa- 0°
tion about both ascending magma composition and physical conditions of Tungurahua
ascent. Here we extend this approach to assess conduit processes that have 2°S
Ecuador
controlled the ongoing eruption of Tungurahua volcano, Ecuador, by (1)
quantifying groundmass crystallinities preserved in ash particles, (2) link- 4°S 200 km
ing crystallinity changes to varying rates of magma ascent as interpreted 81°W 79°W 77°W
from time-averaged magma eruption rates, (3) comparing our results
Figure 1. Ash sampling sites shown on shaded relief map of Tungu-
to experimental studies of crystallization, and (4) using these results to rahua volcano, Ecuador (masl—meters above sea level). Inset: Loca-
explain observed transitions in eruption style. tion map of Tungurahua volcano in Ecuadorean Andes.
Experimental and theoretical models demonstrate that the evolution
of bubble and crystal populations during degassing and magma ascent
changes the physical properties of the ascending magma (e.g., Geschwind METHODS
and Rutherford, 1995; Melnik and Sparks, 1999; Mangan and Sisson, Ash samples (n = 14) from Vulcanian eruptions at Tungurahua were
2000). Water exsolution from ascending volatile-saturated melts triggers collected from solar panel surfaces, roof tops, and plastic collection mats
extensive crystallization at low pressures (e.g., Blundy and Cashman, at nine sample sites from 2000 to 2004. A single sample was also collected
2001). The efficiency of crystallization depends on the rate of magma from the largest eruption of the sequence in August 2006. Each ash sample
ascent and the duration and pressure of shallow storage prior to eruption contains material erupted over 1–2 days. Textural variations among ash
GEOLOGY, July 2012; v. 40; no. 7; p. 619–622; doi:10.1130/G32948.1; 4 figures; Data Repository item 2012181.
GEOLOGY
© | July Society
2012 Geological 2012 | of
www.gsapubs.org
America. For permission to copy, contact Copyright Permissions, GSA, or editing@geosociety.org. 619
particles in each sample were determined using backscattered electron feldspar microlites 10–25 µm long, sparse mafic microlites <5 µm across,
(BSE) images of ash particles (Appendix DR1 in the GSA Data Reposi- and glass SiO2 concentrations from 60 to 66 wt% (Fig. 2A). Class II parti-
tory1). Groundmass glass and feldspar compositions were analyzed using cles contain more feldspar and mafic microlites (<10 µm; average 38% φm)
a Cameca SX50 electron microprobe at the University of Oregon with a 12 and between 64 and 68 wt% SiO2 in groundmass glass (Fig. 2B). Class III
keV electron beam at 20 nA. Dissolved water concentrations of ground- particles contain abundant feldspar and mafic microlites (average 45% φm)
mass glasses were analyzed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spec- and from 66 to 69 wt% SiO2 in groundmass glass (Fig. 2C). Class IV par-
troscopy using band assignments, absorption coefficients (ε), and densi- ticles contain little analyzable glass (average 57% φm). Moreover, the high
ties (ρ) appropriate for dacite glass (Table DR2 in the Data Repository). SiO2 content of groundmass glass (69.4 wt%) decreases the brightness
Path length was corrected from wafer thickness using microlite crystallini- contrast between feldspar microlites and glass (Fig. 2D). Class V particles
ties calculated for each sample, with a resultant error of as much as 50%. are the most crystalline (average 67% φm), with abundant feldspar mafic
microlites and an average groundmass glass with 70.4 wt% SiO2 (Fig. 2E).
RESULTS The average crystallinity (or glass composition) of each ash sample
Most classifications of ash particles rely on optical discrimination of is calculated by multiplying the proportion of each particle class by the
glassy (sideromelane), crystalline (tachylite), lithic (either dense juvenile average φm (or silica content) of that class. Average ash crystallinities from
clasts or altered accidental clasts), and crystal fragments (e.g., Taddeucci et 2000 to 2004 samples are 36%–60%, with corresponding silica contents
al., 2002, 2004; Andronico et al., 2009; Miwa et al., 2009). BSE examina- of 65.0–69.2 wt% (Table DR2). To test the effect of transport distance and
tions of sieved ash mounts from Tungurahua show that each ash sample size class on ash componentry, we analyzed 2 samples from 20 January
is composed of grains of variable crystallinity. To determine an average 2005, using multiple particle size classes (φ sizes 1–4). These compari-
crystallinity for each sample, we classified each ash particle as belong- sons show that ash samples from the same event have the same charac-
ing to one of five textural categories based on microlite crystallinity, φm teristics, regardless of distance from the vent (at least for events lacking
(crystals <35 µm in length), and glass composition (glass K2O is inversely pyroclastic flows; cf. Eychenne et al., 2012) or particle size.
correlated with crystallinity; Fig. 2). Class I particles contain the lowest FTIR analyses of erupted pyroclasts indicate that the groundmass
percentage of microlites in the groundmass (average 29%), with tabular glass of all 2000–2004 pyroclasts is degassed, with a maximum H2O
content of 0.4 wt%; none of the analyzed samples contain detectable dis-
solved carbon dioxide (>10 ppm). These low volatile contents record vola-
tile equilibration at pressure, P ≤ 5 MPa (10 MPa at the high end of the
error range).
DISCUSSION
Crystallinity variations of erupted pyroclasts are most likely con-
trolled by changes in conditions of magma ascent. To test this hypothesis,
we calculate the time-averaged MSR (e.g., Scandone and Malone, 1985)
from the cumulative bulk volume of magma emitted from Tungurahua
between 1999 and 2004 (Fig. 3; also see the Data Repository). Ash emis-
30
Cumulative volume erupted (×106 m3)
1 November 17 July
2003 2004
25 4 August 2002 6 September
2 November 2001
2003
20 18 June 2003
15 April 2001 5 April 2002
14 May 2000
15 1 November 2003
Cumulative volume
erupted (x106 m3)
25.4
25 September 2000 25.2
10 25.0
24.8
24.6
5 24.4
1 Sept. 1 Oct. 1 Nov.
13 November 1999
00 01 02 03 04
20 20 20 20 20
Figure 2. A–E: Ash classification scheme for particle counts (I–V); ry ry ry ry ry
ua ua ua ua ua
Jan
backscatter electron image of each particle type. Corresponding
silica content and crystallinity of corresponding ash particle are Jan Jan Jan Jan
shown. F: Additional classification created for low-crystallinity par- Figure 3. Cumulative volume emission data points (A.G. Ruiz, unpub-
ticles in August 2006 sample; black—vesicles, dark gray—feldspars, lished data) with average supply rate (lines) preceding ash sample
light gray—glass, white—mafic crystals. dates. We use a 2 month data window so that linear fits use more
than 2 data points for all samples (no data are available over the 2
month period preceding 15 April 2001, so we used regression for vol-
1
GSA Data Repository item 2012181, supplementary methods, Table DR1 ume emission data points at end of 2000). For the 2 month time peri-
(ash grain counts, feldspar compositions, glass compositions, and FTIR results), ods during which rate of ash accumulation changed abruptly (slope
and a translated excerpt from unpublished Ruiz et al. manuscript, is available online changed), we use slope corresponding to data most closely preced-
at www.geosociety.org/pubs/ft2012.htm, or on request from editing@geosociety ing sample date (minimum 5 day window); see inset example of rate
.org or Documents Secretary, GSA, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301, USA. calculation where slope changed over this interval (1 November 2003).
0 60 of the 10 yr eruption. At the same time, eruptive styles have included Vul-
-6 -4 -2 0
log dP/dt (MPa/s) canian, Strombolian, and violent Strombolian activity. We have shown
50 that the MSR correlates with the extent of syneruptive magma crystalliza-
tion. The extent of crystallization, in turn, affects the magma rheology, by
40 increasing both the particle-particle interactions (Ji, 2004) and the silica
content of the residual melt (Shaw, 1972); the highest crystallinity Tun-
Class 30
1 gurahua samples have rhyolitic groundmass compositions. Magma rheol-
2 ogy controls not only the deformation properties of the magma, but also
3 20
4 the ability of volatiles to migrate through the conduit. We might therefore
5 expect a direct relationship between the MSR and eruption style (Cash-
10
-3.5 -2.5 -1.5 -0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 man, 2004); at Tungurahua, this relationship is manifested by Strombolian
Volume supply rate log (m3/s) - 2 month average activity (enhanced gas transport) during times of elevated magma supply
(low crystallinity), as observed in August 2001 (e.g., Arellano et al., 2008;
Figure 4. Magma volume supply rate versus microlite crystallinity
Le Pennec et al., 2012). In the extreme case of very high magma supply
of samples. Open symbol corresponds to sample for which no data
points exist over 2 month window used to calculate magma sup- (e.g., July–August 2006), gas retained within the magma exsolves rapidly
ply rate (period ending 15 April 2001). Large symbols correspond during decompression, causing extensive fragmentation. It is interesting
to samples for which break in volume accumulation slope occurred that the threshold MSR inferred for the transition from Strombolian (~1
over 2 month interval and therefore shorter interval was used to m3/s) to sub-Plinian (~103 m3/s) activity at Tungurahua overlaps with other
calculate supply rate; star corresponds to 18 August 2006 inferred
magma supply rate; ±1.5 orders of magnitude based on extrapola- estimates for the transition from violent Strombolian to sub-Plinian activ-
tion error inherent in relationship. Shaded bars represent percent- ity (Pioli et al., 2009).
ages of each textural class for each sample (to show heterogene-
ity). Inset: Crystallinity versus log-integrated decompression rate for CONCLUSIONS
Soufrière Hills experimental samples (single decompression experi-
Vulcanian, Strombolian, and violent Strombolian eruptions at Tun-
ments) with varying annealing pressures (P; t is time) (diamonds:
125 MPa; squares: 100 MPa; circles: 75 MPa; triangles: 50 MPa; gurahua volcano, Ecuador, produce short-lived eruptions of ash and are
Couch et al., 2003), Arenal experimental samples at 60 MPa anneal- fed by variable magma supply rates. The MSR controls the time avail-
ing pressure (filled circles; Szramek et al., 2006), and Tungurahua able for crystallization during magma ascent, thereby controlling the
ash samples assuming 10-m-diameter conduit (x symbols). Offset extent of shallow crystallization (microlite crystallinity). This study pro-
between Soufrière Hills and Arenal curves suggests that composi-
tion and temperature exert strong controls on resultant textures. vides the first quantitative assessment of the relation between ash textures
Conduit diameter of 20 m shifts calculated decompression rate by and magma supply rates. We conclude that syn-ascent crystallization of
factor of 10–0.6 MPa·s. magma occurred at varying decompression rates in response to volatile