Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SIGNIFICANCE OF GROUPS
Contents
2.0 Objectives
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Definition of Groups
2.3 Types of Groups
2.4 Factors of Group Formation
2.5 Theories Underlying Group Work Practice
2.6 Benefits of Groups
2.7 Influence of Groups on Personality Development
2.8 Types of Group Work Groups
2.9 Group Logistics
2.10 Let Us Sum Up
2.11 Key Words
2.12 Suggested Readings
2.13 Answers to Check Your Progress
2.0 OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this unit is to provide you with an understanding of groups. It is aimed
at explaining to you the meaning of groups and its significance for individuals. After
reading this unit you should be able to:
! identify the key characteristics of groups;
! enumerate the various types of groups;
! discuss factors of group formation;
! understand theories of group formation;
! list the benefits individuals gain from groups;
! explain the impact of groups on personality development;
! enumerate the various types of treatment and task groups in social group work;
and
! list the essential aspects in group work logistics.
2.1 INTRODUCTION
All day long we interact first in one group and then in another. We live in a dwelling as
part of a group, we learn in groups contained in the same classroom, we work in
22
groups, we interact with friends in groups, and we spend much of our leisure time in Characteristics and
Significance of Groups
groups. Our family life, our leisure time, our friendships, and our careers are all filled
with groups. In fact, if a person from outer space conducted a study of the people of
Earth, group membership would probably be the dominant characteristic noted. We
are born into a group called the family, and we would not survive the first few minutes,
the first few weeks, or even the first few years of our lives without membership in this
group. It is within our family and peer groups that we are socialised into ways of behaving
and thinking, educated, and taught to have certain perspectives on ourselves and our
world. Our personal identity is derived from the way in which we are perceived and
treated by other members of our groups. We learn, work, and play in groups. As
humans we have an inherent social nature. Our life is filled with groups from the moment
of our birth to the moment of our death. All these make groups one of the most important
factors in our lives. In business, government, and the military there is great interest in
improving the productivity of groups. There is great concern in our society with
strengthening the family. Educators are striving to better understand how the classroom
functions as a group. Drug abuse, delinquency and crime, and mental illness are all
being treated through group procedures, and there is continued concern with making
those procedures more effective. As the effectiveness of groups goes, our quality of life
goes. The more effective our family, career, and educational groups, the higher the
quality of our lives.
While the Oxford definition has captured the basic essence of a group, different social
scientists have put forward their own views on what is a group with emphasis on the
various aspects of a group. We can see some of the definitions below.
Interpersonal Interaction
A group may be defined as a collection of individuals who are interacting with one
another. According to this definition, the individuals are not a group unless they are
interacting with one another. Three psychologists who have defined group in this way
are Bonner, Stogdill, and Homans. They stress that the primary defining characteristic
of a group is interpersonal interaction. It is questionable that a group can exist without
its members interacting with one another.
23
Social Work with Groups Perceptions of Membership
A group may be defined as a social unit consisting of two or more persons who perceive
themselves as belonging to a group. According to this definition, the persons are not a
group unless they perceive themselves to be part of a group. Two psychologists who
have defined group in this way are Bales and Smith. They stress that the primary defining
characteristic of a group, is that the members perceive themselves to be part of a group.
It is questionable that a group could exist without its members being aware that they are
members of a group.
Interdependency
Goals
Group may be defined as a collection of individuals who join together to achieve a goal.
According to this definition, the individuals are not a group unless they are trying to
achieve a mutual goal. Three psychologists who have defined group this way are Deutsch
and Freeman.
They stress that the primary defining characteristic of a group is the craving of its members
to achieve a mutual goal. It is questionable whether a group would exist unless there
was a mutual goal that its members were trying to achieve.
Motivation
Group may be defined as a collection of individuals who are all trying to satisfy
some personal need through their joint association. According to this definition, the
individuals are not a group unless they are motivated by some personal reason to be
part of a group. Two psychologists who have defined group in this way are Bass and
Cattell. They stress that the primary defining characteristic of a group is that its members
belong to the group in order to obtain needed rewards or to satisfy other personal
needs. It is questionable that a group could exist without its member needs being satisfied
by their membership.
Structured Relationships
They say that the primary defining characteristic of a group is that the interaction
of its members is structured by role definitions and norms. It is doubtful whether
a group could exist unless role definitions and norms structure the interaction of its
24 members.
Characteristics and
Mutual Influence Significance of Groups
A group may be defined as a collection of individuals who influence each other.
According to this definition, the individuals are not a group unless they are affecting and
being affected by each other and therefore, the primary defining characteristic of a
group is interpersonal influence. Shaw defined group in this way.
One solution to the profusion of definitions is to combine them all into one definition. A
small group may be defined as two or more individuals who:
a) pursue common goals
b) are interdependent
c) interact with each other
d) share norms concerning matters of common interest and participate in a system of
interlocking roles
e) influence each other
f) find the group rewarding and
g) define themselves and are defined by others as belonging to the group
Not all these characteristics are equally important and although it is impossible to gain
consensus among social scientists as to which characteristics are most important we
can arrive at a definition of group for the purpose of group work as follows.
A group is two or more individuals in face to face interaction, each aware of
positive interdependence as they strive to achieve mutual goals, each aware of
his or her membership in the group, and each aware of the others who belong to
the group.
Voluntary groups are those we join through our own choice and effort. We may join a
political party or a particular occupation. In contrast involuntary groups are those that
we are forced to join or those that we are automatically members of without choice.
For example, everyone is without a choice, automatically a member of sex, age and
racial groups.
An open group is one in which virtually anyone can become a member. For instance, all
can join the Hrithik Roshan fan club. A closed group, however, is much more difficult to
join. Some exclusive clubs restrict membership so that all cannot join. Only a few elites
manage to get memberships in such clubs. Similarly the mafia (underworld) is a closed
group.
A vertical group consists of members from all walks of life, while a horizontal group
consists predominantly of members from one social class. Occupational groups – of
doctors or electricians for instance – are composed largely of members from the same
social class. On the other hand religious groups may have members from all classes.
Primary group is one where members develop close, personal, intimate and enduring
relationships. Family, neighbours and work associates are examples of such groups.
Members know one another well, greatly influence each other and feel closely related.
On the other hand, in secondary groups individuals act towards one another in rather
impersonal, superficial and utilitarian ways.
Natural groups consist of members who come together in a spontaneous fashion on the
basis of naturally occurring events, interpersonal attraction or the mutually perceived
needs of members. Family, peer groups and street gangs are examples of natural groups.
On the other hand formed group consists of members who come together through
some outside influence or intervention. These are groups that are formed for a particular
purpose. Therapy groups, encounter groups, committees and teams are examples of
formed groups.
The type of group that we discussed last – formed group – is of great interest to group
work as the groups that we come across in group work predominantly belong to this
type of groups.
Relying on one principle of this theory that suggests individuals will not change their
behaviour unless they see their behaviour and attitudes as others see them, the t-group
experience attempts to provide participants with extensive feedback about their own
behaviour. Members are confronted with the effects of their own behaviour on other
group members and on the group worker. Role plays, simulations, and other experiential
program activities are often used to illustrate how group processes develop and how
they affect members.
Guided group interaction and positive peer culture are two specialized group work
methods that rely heavily on principles from social exchange theory. They are frequently
used with delinquent adolescents in residential and institutional settings. In both
approaches, structured groups are used to confront, challenge, and eliminate antisocial
peer group norms and to replace them with pro-social norms through guided peer-
group interaction.
The importance of groups for humans has led a number of social scientists to perceive
groups as the salvation or the bane of our species. To some social scientists groups are
the basis for everything that is good in our lives. For other social scientists groups are
destructive influences on our lives. Both views are oversimplified. Groups can have
constructive or destructive effects depending on how they are used.
31
Social Work with Groups
Check Your Progress III
Note: a) Use the space provided for your answer.
b) Check your answer with those provided at the end of this unit.
1) What are the salient features of Systems theory?
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
2) What are important aspects of psychodynamic theory?
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
Social action groups empower members to engage in collective action and planned
change efforts to alter some aspect of the social or physical environment. Social action 37
Social Work with Groups groups serve the common good of both members and non-members. Examples of
social action groups include the following:
! A tenant’s group seeking support for a playground in their housing complex.
! A group of women in poor neighbourhoods working to improve water supply in
their locality.
A worker involved in a social action group can assume one of many leadership roles,
depending on the nature of the change effort and the needs of the group. A worker
assumes an enabler role to help the group acquire information or resources, determine
priorities and procedures and plan a strategy for action. The bond that holds members
of action groups together is a shared perception of injustice, inequity, and a need for a
change in the current social structure. Communication patterns vary with the
circumstances of the group. The worker helps the group develop open communication
patterns so that all members have a chance to become involved. The worker also helps
the group establish communication links with its environment.
Group Size
What is a desirable size for a group? The answer depends on several factors: age of
clients, experience of the leader, type of group, and problems to be explored. For
instance, a group composed of elementary school children might be kept to 4 to 6,
whereas a group of adolescents might be made up of 8 to 12 people. For a weekly
ongoing group of adults, about 10 to 12 people with one leader may be ideal. A group
of this size is big enough to give ample opportunity for interaction and small enough for
everyone to be involved and to feel a sense of “group.”
Frequency and Duration of Meetings
How often should a group meet? For how long? Should a group meet twice weekly
for 1-hour sessions? Or is 1 ½ to 2 hours once a week preferable? With children
and adolescents it may be better to meet more frequently and for a shorter period
to suit their attention span. If the group is taking place in a school setting, the meeting
times can correspond to regularly scheduled class periods. For groups of college students
or relatively well functioning adults, a 2-hour weekly session might be preferable. This
2-hour period is long enough to allow some intensive work yet not so long that fatigue
sets in. You can choose any frequency and duration that suit your style of leadership
and the type of people in your group. For an in-patient group in a mental health centre,
it is desirable to meet on a daily basis for 45 minutes. Because of the members’
psychological impairment, it may not be realistic to hold their attention for a longer
period.
Length of a Group
What should be the duration of a group, and is it wise to set a termination date? For
most groups a termination date should be announced at the outset, so that members
will have a clear idea of the time limits under which they are working. Groups in
educational institutions typically run for about 15 weeks. It is long enough for trust to
develop and for work toward behavioural changes to take place, but it is not so long
that the group seems to be dragging on interminably. A major value of this type of time-
limited group is that members are motivated to realize that they do not have forever to
attain their personal goals. At different points in this 15-week group, members are
challenged to review their progress, both individually and as a group. If they are dissatisfied
with their own participation or with the direction the group is taking, they have the
responsibility to do something to change the situation.
Some groups composed of the same members meet for years. Such a time structure
allows them to work through issues in some depth and to offer support and challenge in
making life changes. These ongoing groups do have the potential for fostering
dependency, and thus it is important that both the leader and members evaluate the
impact of the group on the clients’ daily living.
Place for Group Meetings
Where should the group hold its meetings? Many places will do, but privacy is essential.
Members must be assured that they will not be overheard by people in adjoining rooms. 39
Social Work with Groups Groups often fail because of their physical setting. If they are held in a day hall or ward
full of distractions, productive group work will not occur. You would require a room
that is not cluttered up with chairs and tables and that allows for a comfortable seating
arrangement. Members must be able to sit in a circle. This arrangement lets all the
participants see one another and allows enough freedom of movement that members
can spontaneously make physical contact.
Open Versus Closed Groups
Open groups are characterized by changing membership. As certain members are
ready to leave, new members are admitted, and the group continues. Closed groups
typically have some time limitation, with the group meeting for a predetermined number
of sessions. Generally, members are expected to remain in the group until it ends, and
new members are not added.
There are some advantages to open groups that incorporate new members as others
leave, one of which is an increased opportunity for members to interact with a greater
variety of people. A potential disadvantage of open groups is that rapid changing of
members can result in a lack of cohesion, particularly if too many clients leave or too
many new ones are introduced at once. Therefore, it will be better to bring in new
members one at a time as and when opening occurs.
Shaw, Marvin E. (1977), Group Dynamics, Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi.
1) i) Aggregate v) Aggregate
1) One of the most important factors of group formation is the attraction that a group
offers to its members. The attraction may arise due to reasons such as similarity of
attitudes, availability of something that fulfills the needs of the members etc. Another
factor in group formation is the goals of the group. If the goals suit the members
they join the group. The prestige one attaches to the group also enables the group
to form by recruiting more members who join because of the prestige it offers.
The need for affiliation among humans is a strong factor of group formation. All
human beings want to affiliate themselves with one group or the others as the
group satisfies several socio-emotional needs. Another factor is the proximity of
the individuals and the interaction among them. These factors enable the formation
of groups.
The role of group worker is more Group worker has a limited role
43