NAME: NURFARHANA BINTI ZULKIFLI

NPM: 237000569
After watching the film, please write down your opinion, from an ethical standpoint
(based on an ethics check), whether the actions taken by Libby are ethically
good/justified?
"Double Jeopardy" is a 1999 thriller film featuring Ashley Judd as Libby Parsons, a
woman falsely accused of murdering her husband. In my opinion, I could provide an ethical
interpretation based on the film's premise.
Libby's acts are morally difficult from an ethical position, and whether they are
ethically justifiable depends on one's perspective and ethical framework. Here are some
ethical points to consider:
Revenge and justice: Libby's actions are motivated by her desire to reunite with her
kid and get revenge on her husband, who falsely accused her of a crime she did not commit.
Seeking vengeance may be ethically wrong from a deontological (duty-based) viewpoint, as
it frequently includes causing harm to others. Some may argue that her desire for vengeance
is reasonable in light of the injustice she endured.
Self-Defense: Libby feels that the legal principle of double jeopardy prevents her
from being prosecuted with her husband's death. This raises concerns about self-defense and
the ethical limits of taking another person's life to protect oneself or a loved one. Different
ethical theories may reach different conclusions on this issue.
Freedom: Libby is determined to reclaim her personal independence, reconcile with
her kid, and cleanse her record. Many ethical systems, like utilitarianism, place a premium on
individual happiness and the reduction of suffering. Libby's acts may be viewed as a means to
attain these objectives, which may be ethically defensible.
Break the Law: Throughout the film, Libby participates in a variety of criminal
behaviors in order to attain her goals. Breaking the law is often deemed immoral from a
deontological standpoint. Some may claim that the unfair judicial system she is traversing
justifies her conduct.
Consequences: Ethical judgments frequently consider the implications of one's
behavior. If Libby's acts cause harm to innocent people or increase injustice, the ethical
reason for her conduct may be called into question.
In conclusion, the ethical implications of Libby's conduct in "Double Jeopardy" are
complicated and susceptible to interpretation. Different ethical frameworks may provide
different results. Some may claim her acts are legitimate in the quest for justice and personal
freedom. Still, others may say that her actions are morally problematic, especially when they
entail retaliation or unlawful activity. Finally, the film highlights ethical issues and challenges
that prompt spectators to reflect on their moral beliefs.