Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
I. lfiWo people wanrro fonn a bosiness aJtd wish 10 uy and clirninett pc110nal liabiliry they
would:
2' rarli.1mcnUiry Suprt.'''IUI(Y \\'as O)mpktdy eliminat-ed by the Coosticwioo A.ct and the
O.sner ofRighiS and freedom:
(a) True
·--(b) False
J.
U
In whoch of lhc folk.....ing pTOJOCI structures will an o....ner be de<mod
"Constnooror·· unde< the Oc:cuparional H.ahh and Safety Act?
IQ be lhe
C
(a) cr:odi lil)f)3l
{bJ COtJStnrcuon mana-gemeru
E
(c) design-build
cd) all of the ab<>ve
(e) """' M the above
M
4. Jf rwo business pgnncrs choose • corporation as the~r 1>\ls-ine$$ organiulioo, can e~h or
rhcm be:
5. A pany who commences a lawsuil. loses that lawsuit :Jt u\al .JQC th,~t. l.)l~i.ll'd<:r•c~ :'Ill
api""I will at variotl$ St•ges of the la"'sull be ..:felTed to os:
. {a) Pleintitl'and appdl•nt
(b) l>tfmdano and appellant
(c) Plaontoff' >1><1 n:>i>Ondent
ld) Defendan1 •nd respondent
(e) None ofthe ftl>ove
O(
1>. Does the Provi- of Onc.ario hove the ris)tlto enact a Ia_. th&l .,.... conditions on a
pmon·s &bi ~ty to seek a patent?
7 Which of the following dtspute resolutiOn techni~ues entail the a ~sistanoe of a third party:
(•) Parmcring
(b\ Negotiation
"""' (c) MedJat£on
" (dl Atbi ttatioo
I e) All of Ia). (<) and (d).
(a) rhe DRB can be st• up with panellists who are experts in cc:mstruction mauers;
(b) the PRB is ....~li>hed ot the heginnin~ of lh< proj«:t and is avQilablc t<> respond
lf.) dispute-s as they arise;
I C)
(dl
'\, (cl
All of(a).(l>) and(c)
ll<>th (a) and (b) U
the d«i:sion:s of the ORB arc never subjecl to appcaf:
-
C
9. A ronln<tOt lhal atrani!<S for the posting of a SUT<1y bond will ""vcr he ltlble to lhe
wmy «mi"'RY if lite •wcty C<><ltp31\Y ho< u> I"'Yout ony mtl<li<>lllldcr the bond:
E
(a) True
• (b) False
M
an.
An Owner entered into a COlltCut-1 Wtth Otneral Electric ror the des• Mlllnufacture. delivery,
iJl$t.lll!llitm and testing of a ga.c; turbiM r()r Chc O"'mr's new powt:r project (IN •'G.lS Turbi:nc
.. Conenc~j. Th ~ OWner at~ mtcrod inco a COfUr:.ct w j(h a gt1'ler.ll contn clor 10 buikl the
....MECU
...... ,.loki) . Page 2 of 12 www.ryemecu.com
Obtained from Ryerson's Mechanical Engineering Course Union (MECU) www.ryemecu.com
. 3.
buildins •nd ancillory serviocs for rhe ca.< nubine. Tile contraCI prioc for l!le Gas Turbine
Cootnoct is $8S,OOO,OOO. As part of Gencral Elearic's ol>li¥ations under the Gas T11rbine
Conuact, General Electric is 10 carry out a pmotm:ill« test after installation is complete (tht
value of rhe perf''"'""'ce test <<Jmll(lnent of the wwk is S 1,000,000). As wd I. as part of General
El«tric's ol>tiption under rhe Gas Turbin< ContTa<l, General Elc<tric is to rrovidc spare pans
worth $7$0,000. You are the consultant retained by tht O wner to c:~rry (lut the contract
administrat)on of the Q-s,s Turbine C.onuac:t
Gctt... t EleCiric ..,vises the Owner that it has ad•ieve<l Sobst!llltial rerf<>nnlln«. The ga<
turbine is rt~dy to be opereted. The Owner contract$ yuu 10 ~dvise as 10 whether Subsrarni •l
Perlbrmancc of the Gas Turbine Contract bas been achicvod . Yoo cany Out an inspe\.'1ion 8.114
<ktcnnine tbal ~ Electric has no1 canied out rhe perf.,...,._ test nor hu it Sl>pJ>Iied tbt
spare pans.
12. What 1• the dollar thre•hold below which tht value of defect< t<> be remedie.l or
•n(;omplt te Vt'Ork Eo b~ pertlllmod must fait bef(Wt S1.1bstanhal PttfQrman~e is achieved :
U
~
(b) S8SO,OOO
(c) S847,SOO
(d) S8.500,000 .
C
{e) none of the above
!3. Has O t neral Electric achieved SuboiGlltial Pafo1111ance of the G•• Turbine Contract:
E
(a} \'~<
' (b) No
M
14. Dc:>c:i your aruwer chango if Oeoeral Elcccnc had already earned nut the performance
lest:
(a) Yes
, (bl No
15. Ont.'e )'OP iss.ue the Cenifieate of Subslaotia.l Pt'liC>n'!\ance and dehvtr ;, lo General
E'~C:\ric. when dc)(>S 1he Cmtttruction L'f'' AC'I ~II I)W the- ()wn~r ft• rcl !!a~· lht.: t,a,:i4.'
hold~ck :
...
Obtained from Ryerson's Mechanical Engineering Course Union (MECU) www.ryemecu.com
(c) 45 days aftu lhe Ccniflcau of Tocal Perfonnanee is published in the Daily
Commercial News
tdJ nooe of the above
17. Wl~<h OOC Oflh< following proj«:t struaur.. I< COOOUCh"C tO I "fost·tr•ckcd" project:
"' (b)
(a) traditional
d«iil!fl·build
(c) construct•on mant~ gem cnt
(d) oil of !he above
\ (c) (b) and !c) •bove
(a) JieP
(bj lcnc:rs of credtt
(C) p arant(e
(d) none of the :.buvc
'\
19.
te) (b) end (e) obove
U
Jf .an owner relam.s a ,d esigner 10 produ.;e a set of dr3wing:s and lhat owner wi$hes co be
C
able to use the drawing..s to make fururc modiflOI.ti<>m• to the building it MUSl:
(a) how: the oopynl!l>t in tbc d,..,.;ngs m ip:d to it
(b) have a ticen~e gr..n1«J to •• to make suc.h use of 1hc dr,awings
E
(<) have th• mvr• l rishts oftl>< designer waived
(d) (a) and (c) vr (I>) and (c)
·. (e) Ia). (b) and (c)
M
~0. Based on the theory of pn::cedent. among •he foUowing <::oun~ "'hi"h oouf1'S: <lccistons
would t.:>l<e .,.-eccdence:
., (a) Supwne Coull of On111rio
(bl Onta.no Coun or Jusuoe
(c) Brilish Columbia Court or ] USii«
(dl J\(ln~ ,,f th<' t•fx."t
(e) (b) •nJ {<) at>vve
21. Tn a trial of an engineer who h1.• been accus«< <>f negtig<n<:<, rhe applicable standard of
~i s :
' , (b)
(>) tb< ~rd wbicll would be u<ed by a rasonabte cn~n«r
the sul'tjocuve S:l;.odard
(c) • h~ ~tand3rd tooaaine:d in prvvfncia) rcwuJation~ or CC\mmon iaw PI\)Vtn...-es
(d) Mnt oft hi! :.~ve
.s.
{
22. Slander. ....,,
'• (a) is a f.-.nn of tort ',..,u
(b) includes fraud
(c) both of th< above
(dl is the ~me os dcfamal ion
_,_
~· If ~ftndant A •nd Defendant A are oqncull'ml tonfeo•ors:
-
(b) Defendant A Md Defendant B ore vi..n ously liable J(.": ~
(c) ,., and (b) 9
(d l Defendant A and ~f<ndanl B bolb committ£<1 • ton
24. The Hedley Byrne vs. H¢1ler case is imponant t~ engmcers because u establtshcs th;u;
(a) re-Tianu on profe-.~~jonal d:ill and jl.ldg:mtnt c.an ~i\'e rise "·' a do1y of <·are
\. \b)
\,(c)
(d)
or
both rhc above
U
professionals may be lial;>lo fO< roeglig<t~r •dvice
a di:scJ:~imer \\'ill RO{ protecr a professional &om liability {ot negh&ent ad\•icc
C
25. The purposc of<on Jowls:
l!ndcr ;\ ·•naditionat pr¢jec• stn.~cturt'' Jnvoh'•l'lg an O~:nc:r. the Owner':) Eng1n<cr wl<l ch~
Owner's Oen~ral Contracror:
(a)
(b)
(he Enaineer owts a duty of -care to •he Owner
~,. En£in~ can onl )· bc li•ble to 1.ne Owner
·l:
( e) tiK En.s,•nter owes a duty or care to I he Gene-ral Contracwr
. (d) ta) and lei
29. Th< new limilllliom Ac:l,2002 prevenl<> pleinliff frocn •uift& a de(<Jidant.
(a) not until si.~ year~ after the rime of the action arose
(bl oticr Ofleen y~ars after lhe cvmts "'cuncd
(c) after rwo y~l"$ after <fiscover~bHily of the e ltim
. (d) after whichever ofttle two limuohoo periods described on (b) or (c) ends earfief
(a) the panics to a contract may agree t~ change the apphcablc- limitation period 1hat
uppHe-s to them
(b) ••Y such agreem<nt I<> change the opphcoble llonltnliun period" void
(c) the c.oncc:pt of discoverab•ht}· is n~ looger relevant
(d} the ooncept<>f disc~verability docs nol apply to tort cl~ims
31. An C!'llincC'f whu prepares and deljvers to a clicnc 111 report whtch con101i.ns a ncgrig_en£
misslatcmcnl :
(o) U
moy he prO<e<ted from J i~lity by the tenm of tht mgineer·• rorur.>e~ ..; tit lh<
C
elien<
(b) may be pcotocted by • disclaimer in lh< rcpon
(c) l>odl of the abuve
none of the •bove
E
(d)
M
(•) the cng,~~r ..... 11 rwc bot respot~slbl<: tOr the adeq\lacy of the .xh·i.t::<:.
. (bl thcrngineer.,.i ll be responsible fo,.,he adcqu•cyof lhe ad vke
(c) the ""Ill"""' wi;J 001 be responsible if the od\Olc< w•s l!iY<n during • &elf
tournament
. (d) the engineer may he lioblc for the odequ>cy of the advice un.lff <OOtfOCI law
35. Where an employee acting within the ru!()nable scope of Ills or her retpOn<il>iliry
c.ornmils nesli&cnce, vican(tU! liablUty mu ns that:
U
t<> his or her employer and clients, only
to onyone a reasonable engineer <ould foresee would be hanned by the engineer's
C
conduct
(d) ooly to those ptr$()1\S with whom the eaginctr has privity
E
38. To pr<>Ve that • defendant enaineer l>reachod the duty of . .... undc:r to~ Jaw. it must be
establ;.hed lha t the enpn<et's c:ooclue~ :
M
40. In a neatisence oloun. the plainciff must prov;dc <noog/1 ev1dence apins t tbc defendant
10 prcw:c the d aim:
(b)
enforceable.
Qvannm merui1 is lhe legal principk by wllid> a """" may enfm:e.., o<herwis<
C
' ( ) lc)
unenforuabJe gratuitous promise.
(dl Bolh (b) and (c).
(<I A II of lhe above.
E
' C•l Th!J us~ ofTrunonb ExpJor~•ioo "· Murph)• lsl)nt i.>f the: le-ading C3$t:S in C2in.ada
dealing wilh the <>Oncepl of e<jUitable est<oppel.
.9.
(~) A minor has the: g pacity to entCT into oenrun •wn ooncratts.
,, (c) Penalty (]auscs art enforc:eable under conti"$Ct law.
" (d) Bolh (a) 311d (c).
(e) All of tbe eoovc.
(o) The c;ase of Hunter v. Sync::rudc i s • case de11hng with quanrum meruit.
•, l (b) A hmitativn of liabitit~ clause wlllch limits one party'& li•bilny to Sl.()(l is not
enforceable.
(e) Equitable e•IA>pp<l i• a legal princi ple •ppfied to ..uurc that on< paf(y "' a
contract CMl tall:t advant8ge of tbr Olhcr p3ny·s m1s.W;c.
(d ) Bolh (b) 3lld (e~
(c) None ofllle abcwt".
(c) Wbe.-. an iMocent pany claims lh•t undue onOocncc has been e.cncd by the
other party to a contracl> the ir\n('l~ l pany must lake pmmr• ,cuoo when the
undue tnnumcc or threat is Rmovcd.
(d) Both (a) and (b).
(e) All oftbe above.
appro~ch to U
staterntnts al"C' true?
(a) There are three types of.ntsrcpresentatiQn~ mnucent. negligent i!nd fraudultnt.
(b} Only wberc ottc of the- parties fo a cOtltriCl makes an i~UlQocenl mtSrq>res:cnlaut.m,
ean the innocent pany rt~c.\nd lhe cont~~
(o} The lepl principle of n< !lli~tn l miSr<Jl<es<nlation does 1101 apply iQ con on....
(<II Both (at and (l,l.
lei All ofche above.
· II ·
56. As acneral lcsaJ pnn<:iples, \n the event of a breach o f controct, which of lhe followill&
an U'\le SlaH!I1lents?
(a) The norHitfaultins party can usually recover its damat~es ~ulting from tho
bruch o f eoolract.
(b) The non·defauUing party rney in certain cirC\J111S!ance be entitled 1o ,...,inate the
c:ontracc.
(<) As o seneral principle., damages a"""*<' to the noJ>.<Icfautting p!tty should put
that party in <he same po•llion .. <ft~c contract had been perfonned.
(d) Both lb) and (c ).
(e) All of the above.
(a) A p.ny 10 • contract rnay be considered to hoivc repudiated a contra<t if that I""'Y
•nnotJr\Ces by it$ words or actions d\8t it has no intencioo of 'on\pleting lhe
QOI\tr~\.
(b) In the C35e of a rep&tdiation, tfle dillmages ..rc calculated as of lhC' dat~ or
(c)
(d)
repudlatton of the .:ontract.
U
The inno<ctJt p:>rty <aMOt elect 1o ac<>qrt the other pony's repulliation, but mu$1
continue with the c:onrr~c-1 (if rossible).
Both (a) and (b).
C
(e) AU of the above.
(b) Some of the r<medle$ whkh may be avoHable to a nvn·defa~~lting party in tb<
evenr of a bruch of contract include: ltnninat•on. sp«ific perfC>rmance and
injunchons.
(c) Quanlllm meruh is a lo&~~l principle "''!'licd wher! thee arc no <:on tract proviS>QnS
dealin&with oontracl price.
(d) Both (a) and (c)
(c) All of the a'oove.
'
~ 9. Which of lhc tollowin£ ~muem~nc~ are: true.>
·.
(a} £nginccn may be required to ac1as a clie-nt'~ agent
(b) Entiineers can n.-cr be concunently hahle for breach of contract toN! for
n.gligmce.
(c) !n adrnin•sLerint rhe terms of .a construc:tion contract~ an engineer may bt> rcqujred
to make decision1: ~ffccting the right~ of the owner and the contrdctor.
.. (d) Bolh \!l !!!H¥\
(•J AU ofth• ab~vc
• 12.
IaI C<>uns will enforce liquidated damages clauses in a contra" if they are a genuine
pr&estimate of damages.
tb) The lesal principle <>f substantial compliance is usually "'Plicilly stated tn
mod-em cons1ruction f:ontracts.
(c) The pUIJlOSe of an inJunction is to enforce a promise not to do S(lt!>Cthing.
hl) The remedy of s!"'Ci6c perfotmanc• ts most often applied in sal< of land casos.
(o) All oftheahQv~.
U
C
E
M