The theory of rational consumer choice is based on the principles of consumer rationality and perfect information. It assumes that consumers will act in their own self-interest to maximize their satisfaction from economic decisions by rationally choosing products that provide the most benefit based on their preferences and complete information about options. However, behavioral economics has shown that psychological factors can influence choices in ways that do not always maximize utility, such as through heuristics, biases, and framing effects. Nudge theory and choice architecture are policy approaches that aim to subtly influence choices in predictable ways without mandates.
The theory of rational consumer choice is based on the principles of consumer rationality and perfect information. It assumes that consumers will act in their own self-interest to maximize their satisfaction from economic decisions by rationally choosing products that provide the most benefit based on their preferences and complete information about options. However, behavioral economics has shown that psychological factors can influence choices in ways that do not always maximize utility, such as through heuristics, biases, and framing effects. Nudge theory and choice architecture are policy approaches that aim to subtly influence choices in predictable ways without mandates.
The theory of rational consumer choice is based on the principles of consumer rationality and perfect information. It assumes that consumers will act in their own self-interest to maximize their satisfaction from economic decisions by rationally choosing products that provide the most benefit based on their preferences and complete information about options. However, behavioral economics has shown that psychological factors can influence choices in ways that do not always maximize utility, such as through heuristics, biases, and framing effects. Nudge theory and choice architecture are policy approaches that aim to subtly influence choices in predictable ways without mandates.
Utility is the satisfaction or benefit a consumer can get from a good or
service. The idea of consumers always acting in their own self-interest to
maximize the satisfaction derived from own economic decisions is supported by the theory of rational consumer choice which is based on several principles. The first one is consumer rationality that combines all assumptions about the individual’s capabilities. For example, consumers are able to rank goods by preference, meaning they can certainly say which ones they prefer or not. They also preserve consistency between choices, such as when preferring A over B and B over C, they should prefer A over C. Lastly, consumers always prefer more of a good to less when being confronted by 2 groups with different number of goods. The second principle is perfect information stating that a consumer has knowledge of all possible products, their qualities, and prices. As a result, when they pick 1 good over another, they do so because of the information available, thereby acting rational. In conclusion, both principles lead to utility maximization as consumers always tend to maximize their satisfaction from consuming goods and services by doing reasonable purchases based on rationality and having all information about the products.
Even so, the above assumption can be criticized by behavioral economics
which studies the effects of psychological factors in economic decision. It shows that the theory of rational consumer choice has limitations in the form of biases (systematic errors in thinking and evaluating) that can impact consumer choices. For instance, rules of thumb are simple guidelines based on experience and common sense that exclude any complex consideration of choices, like comparing one serving of fruit to a fist in size (avoiding more complicating ways of doing measurements). In addition, anchoring is purchases based on irrelevant information, such as when shopping for a new computer and the first one is $3,000, but you skip and find another one for $1,700, so suddenly, the second computer seems a bargain, even though it's still expensive. Finally, there’s framing – purchases based on the way information is presented, like when preferring yogurt with package saying “80% fat free” instead of “20% fat”. Such standpoint inspired several procedures used in countries’ policies nowadays, in particular, nudge theory and choice architecture. Nudge theory is finding a method to influence consumers’ choices in a predictable way without offering something. For example, in 2012, the UK government decided to change the reminder letters sent to taxpayers that were late in their income tax payment with the help of The British Behavioral Insights Team (BIT). The team altered the messaging to “Nine out of ten people in the U.K. pay their taxes on time. You are currently in the very small minority of people who have not paid us yet.” As a consequence, this had a significant effect on the delinquent taxpayers who, in the number of almost 120,000, made payments of 4.9 million pounds which would not have been raised without the intervention. By feeling isolated and pressured, consumers were influenced to not examine the situation properly, but rather indulge own instincts, thereby diminishing the money available to purchase goods and services, and therefore, total utility.