You are on page 1of 14

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/375119305

The Burden and Correlates of Waterpipe (Hookah) Smoking among


Adolescents and Youth: A Systematic Review

Article in Substance Use & Misuse · October 2023


DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2257320

CITATIONS READS

0 68

12 authors, including:

Harsh Priya Deepika Mishra


All India Institute of Medical Sciences All India Institute of Medical Sciences
66 PUBLICATIONS 330 CITATIONS 94 PUBLICATIONS 467 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Anubhuti Sood Chaya Rani Hazarika


Translational Health Science and Technology Institute Indian Council of Medical Research
21 PUBLICATIONS 64 CITATIONS 10 PUBLICATIONS 17 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Chaya Rani Hazarika on 03 November 2023.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Substance Use & Misuse

ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/isum20

The Burden and Correlates of Waterpipe (Hookah)


Smoking among Adolescents and Youth: A
Systematic Review

Stuti Sharad Bhargava, Saibal Das, Harsh Priya, Deepika Mishra, Santhosh
Shivabasappa, Anubhuti Sood, Chaya Rani Hazarika, Prakash Chandra
Gupta, Joy Kumar Chakma, Leimapokpam Swasticharan, Praveen Sinha,
Vineet Gill Munish & Shalini R. Gupta

To cite this article: Stuti Sharad Bhargava, Saibal Das, Harsh Priya, Deepika Mishra, Santhosh
Shivabasappa, Anubhuti Sood, Chaya Rani Hazarika, Prakash Chandra Gupta, Joy Kumar
Chakma, Leimapokpam Swasticharan, Praveen Sinha, Vineet Gill Munish & Shalini R. Gupta (31
Oct 2023): The Burden and Correlates of Waterpipe (Hookah) Smoking among Adolescents and
Youth: A Systematic Review, Substance Use & Misuse, DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2257320

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2023.2257320

View supplementary material

Published online: 31 Oct 2023.

Submit your article to this journal

View related articles

View Crossmark data

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at


https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=isum20
Substance Use & Misuse
https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2023.2257320

RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Burden and Correlates of Waterpipe (Hookah) Smoking among


Adolescents and Youth: A Systematic Review
Stuti Sharad Bhargavaa*, Saibal Dasb,c*, Harsh Priyad, Deepika Mishrae, Santhosh Shivabasappaf, Anubhuti
Soodg, Chaya Rani Hazarikah, Prakash Chandra Guptai, Joy Kumar Chakmaa, Leimapokpam Swasticharanj,
Praveen Sinhak, Vineet Gill Munishk and Shalini R. Guptal
a
Division of Non Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India; bIndian Council of Medical Research - Centre for
Ageing and Mental Health, Kolkata, India; cDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; dDepartment of Public
Health Dentistry, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; eDepartment of Oral
Pathology and Microbiology, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; fDepartment of
Clinical Pharmacology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Eductaion and Research, Puducherry, India; gTranslational Health Science and
Technology Institute, Faridabad, India; hSocio-Behavioral Health Systems and Implementation Research Division, Indian Council of Medical
Research, New Delhi, India; iHealis Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health, Navi Mumbai, India; jDirectorate General of Health Services, Ministry of
Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India; kWorld Health Organization – India, New Delhi, India; lDepartment of Oral
Medicine and Radiology, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

ABSTRACT KEYWORDS
Background: This systematic review evaluated the available medical literature on the prevalence and Adolescents; burden; hookah;
trends of waterpipe tobacco smoking among adolescents and youth in jurisdictionally representative waterpipe smoking; youth
populations. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for relevant studies from
inception until 31 December 2022 that reported the burden of waterpipe smoking among
adolescents and youth (10–24 years of age). We extracted qualitative data on the demographic
characteristics, burden, and correlates of waterpipe smoking (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022310982).
Results: A total of 2,197 articles were screened and 62 were included in the analysis. The majority
(29) of the studies was from the United States of America and there were no studies from the
south-east Asian region. The prevalence of ever waterpipe smoking among the 10–24 years age
group was noted to be 18.16% (95% CI, 18.03–18.29). The prevalence of current (30-day) waterpipe
smoking was 6.43% (95% CI, 6.34–6.50). The age of initiation of waterpipe smoking was variable.
The prevalence of waterpipe smoking was higher among males, among those who belong to the
high- and middle-income groups, and among university students. The common risk factors of
waterpipe smoking included cigarette smoking, alcohol, and substance use. Waterpipe smoking
resulted in increased susceptibility to the use of conventional forms of tobacco (e.g. smoking)
among those who were never smokers. Conclusion: Waterpipe smoking usage was significantly high
among adolescents and young adults. Developing regulatory guidelines for water-pipe smoking,
surveillance of its use, intervention, and specific policy frameworks may be considered a public
health priority.

Introduction media, lack of waterpipe smoking-specific policy and regula-


tions, and erroneous perceptions about the relative safety of
Waterpipe smoking is a form of tobacco consumption that uti- waterpipe smoking (Advisory note: waterpipe tobacco smok-
lizes a single or multi-stemmed instrument to smoke flavored ing: health effects, research needs and recommended actions
or non-flavored tobacco, where the smoke is designed to pass by regulators, 2nd edition). Waterpipe smoke is addictive and
through water or other liquid before reaching the smoker. toxic, as it emanates from the combustion of tobacco. Waterpipe
Although considered to be a traditional practice, the use of smokers absorb toxicants and carcinogens from waterpipe
waterpipe smoking is reemerging as a popular trend, especially smoke in appreciable amounts resulting in immediate adverse
among adolescents and young adults across the world. Some physiological effects, as well as multiple long-term adverse
of the distinctive factors that appear to contribute to the grow- health outcomes (Advisory note: waterpipe tobacco smoking:
ing popularity of waterpipe tobacco smoking include the intro- health effects, research needs and recommended actions by
duction of flavored tobacco (muʽassel/maassel), social regulators, 2nd edition). Evidence suggests that waterpipe
acceptability due to the rising café, lounge bars, and restaurant smoking can cause acute lung infection and injury, carbon
culture, promotion through mass communication and social monoxide poisoning, oral and systemic genotoxicity, reduced

CONTACT Stuti Sharad Bhargava stuti.bhargava@icmr.gov.in Division of Non Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, V. Ramalingaswami
Bhawan, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi: 110 029, India
*These authors have contributed equally.
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2023.2257320.
© 2023 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
2 S. S. BHARGAVA ET AL.

pulmonary function, altered vascular and hemodynamic func- defined by the authors). We studied any measure of the bur-
tions, and adverse psychological effects (Adetona et al., 2021). den and/or correlates of waterpipe tobacco smoking.
Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have shown Interventional studies, case reports, case series, commentar-
this method of tobacco consumption to be linked to diseases ies, reviews, viewpoints, editorials, or opinions were excluded.
typically associated with cigarette use, such as lung cancer, Studies on waterpipe smoking for non-tobacco products (e.g.
oral cancer, cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, and cannabis, opium), studies in which waterpipe tobacco smok-
low birth weight (Akl et al., 2010; Waziry et al., 2017). ing burden and/or correlates were not provided separately
Despite this, both waterpipe tobacco users and non-users from the data on other forms of tobacco use, and studies
consider waterpipe tobacco to be less harmful than cigarette involving other age groups were also excluded.
tobacco (Akl et al., 2015). The World Health Organization
Global Action Plan has set a target of a 25% relative reduc-
tion in tobacco use by 2025 (Ward, 2015; Global Action Plan Search strategy
for the Prevention and Control of NCDs 2013-2020). A sys- We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from inception
tematic review conducted in 2008 showed that waterpipe until 31 December 2022. We used “waterpipe” along with its
tobacco smoking prevalence was alarmingly high among synonyms and their spelling variations, e.g., “hookah”, “shisha”,
school and university students in middle eastern countries as “narghile”, and other culturally-specific terms. For various bib-
well as among adolescents of middle eastern descent in west- liographic databases, the search terms were adapted along
ern countries (Akl et al., 2011). A study on the global epide- with database-specific filters. The titles and abstracts of rele-
miology of waterpipe smoking conducted in 2015 showed vant studies in the English language were found using the
that waterpipe smoking has become a global public health search strategy by two independent authors. To determine the
problem (Akl et al., 2015). A systematic review in 2018 fur- suitability, the authors then retrieved the study abstracts, and
ther demonstrated that Waterpipe tobacco smoking is most if necessary, the full text of the articles. The web-based Rayyan
prevalent in eastern Mediterranean and European countries, software (https://www.rayyan.ai/) was used for this purpose.
and appears higher among youth than adults (Jawad et al., For accessing the missing information, the corresponding
2018). Developing surveillance, intervention, and regulatory/ authors of the relevant article were contacted by email.
policy frameworks specific to the waterpipe has become a
public health priority (Maziak et al., 2015),
While these show an exponentially rising number of Data analysis
prevalence studies, references to these are often unsystematic
Abstract reviewing and data extraction was carried out inde-
and focus on a selective number of studies in a limited
pendently by three authors using a pre-formatted data extraction
number of countries and typically at a non-jurisdictionally
spreadsheet. No assumptions or simplifications were made
representative level (e.g., single-center studies among college
during data extraction. The included studies were assessed for
students) (Maziak, 2011; Maziak et al., 2015). These
risk of bias by three authors using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale
approaches are likely to introduce bias that could under- or
(Table s1) (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute). We extracted
over-estimate the prevalence, and therefore importance, of
data on the demographic characteristics of the study popula-
waterpipe tobacco use in the discourse, around policy mea-
tion, burden (proportion for institution-based studies and prev-
sures. This is particularly important to address within water-
alence for community-based studies) for ever use and current
pipe tobacco research given the relatively high prevalence
(30-day) use, and correlates of waterpipe smoking. We analyzed
among adolescents and youth as compared to other popula-
the data based on the geographical region, age of the studied
tion groups (Akl et al., 2011). In this regard, there is a
population, sampling frame, and socio-demographic character-
dearth of summarized evidence on the burden and correlates
istics of the study population. The risk factors of waterpipe
of waterpipe smoking among adolescents and youths across
smoking were enumerated as reported in the original studies
the world. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review the
and classified in the same way. A third author was involved in
medical literature on the prevalence and trends of waterpipe
disagreement resolution if any. We categorized verbatim preva-
tobacco smoking among adolescents and youth in jurisdic-
lence measures and trends of current (30-day) and ever water-
tionally representative populations.
pipe smoking. The study protocol can be accessed in
PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022310982).

Methods
Results
Study design
Description of the included studies
We included all completed and published studies involving
the general population or demographically defined popula- A total of 2,197 articles were screened, and finally, 62
tions (e.g. defined by age, gender, or ethnicity) which reported (Varsano et al., 2003; Almerie et al., 2008; Jackson & Aveyard,
the burden of waterpipe smoking in the population of age 2008; Korn & Magnezi, 2008; Primack et al., 2009; Jamil
between 10 and 24 years (adolescents and youth) (Adolescent et al., 2010; Noonan et al., 2011; Smith et al., 2011; Sterling
and young adult health) including populations within educa- & Mermelstein, 2011; Abughosh et al., 2012; Fielder et al.,
tional establishments and, at any level of the jurisdiction (as 2012; Jarrett et al., 2012; Mzayek et al., 2012; Heinz et al.,
Substance Use & Misuse 3

2013; Jawad et al., 2013, 2016; McKelvey et al., 2013, 2014; were included for the qualitative synthesis (Figure 1). The
Reveles et al., 2013; Barnett et al., 2014; Goodwin et al., characteristics of the included studies are summarized in
2014; Palamar et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014, 2021; Table 1. The 62 studies were conducted in 19 countries. The
Cavazos-Rehg et al., 2015; Jaber et al., 2015; Khan et al., majority of the studies were from the United States of
2015; Kheirallah et al., 2015; Linde et al., 2015; Obaid et al., America (USA) (29), followed by Iran (6), Jordan (5), the
2014; Roohafza et al., 2015; Villanti et al., 2015; United Kingdom (4), and Lebanon (2). There were no studies
Abbasi-Ghahramanloo et al., 2016; Abdo et al., 2016; Bahelah from the south-east Asian region. The majority of the studies
et al., 2016; Grinberg & Goodwin, 2016; Jawad & Power, were published from 2013-2018 (30), followed by 2018-2023
2016; Kelishadi et al., 2016; Nădăşan et al., 2016; Salloum (15), and 2008-2013 (13). Thirty-three studies were con-
et al., 2016; Shepardson & Hustad, 2016; Abdullah et al., ducted among school-going students, 16 among university
2017; Kasza et al., 2017; Bashirian et al., 2018; Ghelichkhani students, two studies included both school-going and univer-
et al., 2018; Kulak et al., 2018; Roods et al., 2018; Ross et al., sity students, and 11 studies did not specify the study popu-
2018; Azagba et al., 2019; Fitzpatrick et al., 2019; Galimov lation. Two studies were conducted wholly among female
et al., 2019; Miri-Moghaddam et al., 2019; Abbadi et al., participants while one included only male participants. The
2020; Klosterhalfen et al., 2020; Naicker et al., 2020; Roberts proportion of female participants in different studies varied
& Ferketich, 2020; Salih et al., 2020; Sharma et al., 2020; from 43.1 to 63.6. The age of the study participants ranged
Hanewinkel et al., 2021; Hirpa et al., 2021; Little et al., 2021) from 10 to 24 years.

Figure 1. Study flow chart depicting the steps of the synthesis of evidence from the literature.
4 S. S. BHARGAVA ET AL.

Table 1. Summary characteristics of the included studies.


Current
Ever use (30-day)
Sample burden use burden
Author, year Country Study population/setting Study design Study method size (n) (%) (%)
Abbasi-Ghahramanloo Iran University students Cross-sectional study Anonymous structured 1,834 18.16 –
et al., 2016 questionnaires
Varsano et al., 2003 Israel School students Cross-sectional study Self-reported questionnaire 388 40.98 21.91
Primack et al., 2009 USA School students Youth Tobacco Survey Standardized questionnaire 6,594 6.40 3.50
Azagba et al., 2019 USA School students National Youth Tobacco Self-administered, 17,872 7.10 2.50
Survey questionnaires
Hirpa et al., 2021 Ethiopia School students Cross-sectional study Self-reported questionnaire 3,347 2.57 0.60
Korn & Magnezi, 2008 Israel School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 326 37.12 9.82
anonymous
questionnaire
Bashirian et al., 2018 Iran School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 730 62.74 26.30
anonymous
questionnaire
Jaber et al., 2015 Jordan School students Longitudinal study Study questionnaire 1,781 16.73 –
Kelishadi et al., 2016 Iran School students Survey of a school-based Self-administered 13,486 5.90 1.83
surveillance system anonymous
questionnaire
Salloum et al., 2016 USA Adults National Adult Tobacco Telephone survey 2,528 15.74 3.80
Survey
McKelvey et al., 2014 Jordan School students Longitudinal Survey Self-administered 1,243 36.85 –
anonymous
questionnaire
Sterling & Mermelstein, USA School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 951 58.46 29.86
2011 anonymous
questionnaire
Miri-Moghaddam et al., Iran University students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 500 31.20 15.00
2019 anonymous
questionnaire
Ross et al., 2018 USA National Cross-sectional study Telephonic interviews 1,125 2.04 –
population-based
sample of
adolescents
Fielder et al., 2012 USA College students Longitudinal study Monthly online surveys 483 44.93 12.97
Reveles et al., 2013 Brazil School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 495 19.80 –
anonymous
questionnaire
Jawad et al., 2013 UK Medical students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 489 51.74 6.34
anonymous
questionnaire
Abbadi et al., 2020 Jordan School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 1,082 – 31.42
anonymous online
questionnaire
Roohafza et al., 2015 Iran School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 5,336 32.21 11.5
anonymous
questionnaire
McKelvey et al., 2013 Jordan School students Longitudinal study Self-administered 1,781 30.21 14.04
anonymous
questionnaire
Kheirallah et al., 2015 Jordan School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 1,476 14.16 –
(Global Youth Tobacco anonymous
Survey) questionnaire
Bahelah et al., 2016 Lebanon School students Longitudinal study Interview 498 35.34 32.13
Heinz et al., 2013 USA University students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 143 47.55 22.38
anonymous
questionnaire
Klosterhalfen et al., 2020 Germany Household survey Cross-sectional study Interview 12,220 13.24 1.78
(German Study on
Tobacco Use)
Mzayek et al., 2012 Jordan School students Longitudinal Self-administered 1,701 46.38 18.87
anonymous
questionnaire
Salih et al., 2020 Saudi Arabia University students Cross-sectional study Web-based survey 385 34.03 –
Almerie et al., 2008 Syria University students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 570 23.51 –
anonymous
questionnaire
Ghelichkhani et al., 2018 Iran Community-dwelling Cross-sectional study Interview 2,257 4.25 –
individuals (Iran’s sixth national
Surveillance of Risk
Factors of
Non-Communicable
Diseases)

(Continued)
Substance Use & Misuse 5

Table 1. Continued.
Current
Ever use (30-day)
Sample burden use burden
Author, year Country Study population/setting Study design Study method size (n) (%) (%)
Abdullah et al., 2017 Canada Community-dwelling Cross-sectional study Telephone-based survey 6,398 19.72 3.36
individuals (Canadian Tobacco Use
Monitoring Survey
2011 and 2012)
Galimov et al., 2019 Russia School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 716 34.92 9.36
anonymous
questionnaire
Noonan et al., 2011 USA University students Cross-sectional study Web-based survey 223 60.99 13.45
Kulak et al., 2018 USA University students Cross-sectional study Web-based survey 1538 13.85 18.60
Jawad et al., 2016 UK University students Cross-sectional study Online survey 2,213 63.67 13.56
Palamar et al., 2014 USA School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 5,540 18.74 –
anonymous
questionnaire
Nadasan et al., 2016 Romania School students Cross-sectional study Online questionnaire 1,835 21.09
Fitzpatrick et al., 2019 USA Adolescents visiting an Cross-sectional study Online assessment 257 14.79 –
urban pediatric clinic
Abughosh et al., 2012 USA University students Cross-sectional study Online survey 1,195 50.88 –
Khan et al., 2015 Pakistan Women of reproductive Cross-sectional study Questionnaire 2,554 2.11 –
age group (Pakistan Demographic
and Health Survey)
Jamil et al., 2010 USA Community-dwelling Cross-sectional study Self-administered 89 – 43.82
individuals anonymous
questionnaire
Wang et al., 2021 Hong Kong School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 33,991 3.60 1.84
anonymous
questionnaire
Shepardson & Hustad, USA University students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 936 22.33 13.10
2016 anonymous
questionnaire
Jawad et al., 2016 UK Community-dwelling Cross-sectional study Self-administered 219 46.58 –
individuals anonymous
questionnaire
Barnett et al., 2014 USA School students Longitudinal (Florida Self-administered 36,439 16.70 7.70
Youth Tobacco Survey) anonymous
questionnaire
Villanti et al., 2015 USA Young adults Cross-sectional study Online questionnaire 1,555 25.02 4.69
(Legacy Young Adult
Cohort Study)
Grinberg & Goodwin, USA Adults Cross-sectional study Telephonic survey 85,545 5.59 1.10
2016 (Tobacco Use
Supplement of the
Current Population
Survey)
Hanewinkel et al., 2021 Germany School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 2,752 13.84 –
anonymous
questionnaire
Abdo et al., 2016 Lebanon School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 1,982 31.79 16.90
anonymous
questionnaire
Obaid et al., 2014 Dubai School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 2,457 2.20 –
anonymous
questionnaire
Roods et al., 2018 USA School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 4,500 13.00 5.51
(Youth Tobacco Survey) anonymous
questionnaire
Jackson & Aveyard, 2008 UK University students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 937 37.89 8.00
anonymous
questionnaire
Naicker et al., 2020 South Africa School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 579 26.08 –
anonymous
questionnaire
Cavazos-Rehg et al., 2015 USA Adults Cross-sectional study Online survey 1,217 45.11 –
Sharma et al., 2020 USA Adults and youth Longitudinal (Population Audio computer-assisted 15,647 26.97 –
Assessment of Tobacco self-interviews
and Health Study)
Little et al., 2021 USA USA Air Force military Cross-sectional study Survey 2,411 13.73 –
recruits
Smith et al., 2011 USA School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 691 26.05 –
anonymous
questionnaire

(Continued)
6 S. S. BHARGAVA ET AL.

Table 1. Continued.
Current
Ever use (30-day)
Sample burden use burden
Author, year Country Study population/setting Study design Study method size (n) (%) (%)
Jarrett et al., 2012 USA University students Cross-sectional study Institution-administered 82,155 30.80 9.56
paper or web-based
questionnaire
Roberts & Ferketich, 2020 USA University students Longitudinal study Online survey 529 13.23 –
Kasza et al., 2017 USA Community-dwelling Longitudinal study Audio computer-assisted 22,761 22.27 9.00
individuals self-interview
Wang et al., 2014 USA School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 24,658 8.90 0.32
anonymous
questionnaire
Wang et al., 2019 USA School students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 19,018 7.10 2.60
anonymous
questionnaire
Goodwin et al., 2014 USA University students Cross-sectional study Self-administered 1,799 – 14.06
anonymous
questionnaire
Linde et al., 2015 USA USA Air Force military Cross-sectional study Self-administered 5,094 26.15 –
recruits anonymous
questionnaire
UK, United Kingdom; USA, United States of America.

Table 2. Prevalence estimates of waterpipe smoking based on region, country,


reported the current (30-day) prevalence of waterpipe smok-
and study population. ing. The prevalence of current (30-day) waterpipe smoking
Current (30-day) was 6.43% (95% CI, 6.34–6.50). Twenty-eight out of 40
Ever use % (n) use % (n) (70%) studies reported a > 5% prevalence of current (30-day)
WHO regions Africa 6 (3,926) 0.6 (3,347) use of waterpipe, while 11 studies reported such prevalence
America 19.9 (2,76,603) 6.91 (2,60,954) of >15%. The prevalence of ever smoking of waterpipe was
Eastern 17.33 (40,571) 9.35 (27,096)
Mediterranean highest in the European region (22.8%), followed by the
Region Americas (19.9%), and the eastern Mediterranean region
Europe 22.8 (22,095) 4.7 (17,289) (17.3%). The prevalence of current (30-day) use waterpipe
Western Pacific 3.6 (33,991) 1.8 (33,991)
Top seven USA 19.88 (2,69,710) 7 (2,54,556) smoking was highest in the eastern Mediterranean region
countries Iran 14.7 (24,143) 5.6 (20,052) (9.35%), followed by the Americas (6.9%), and Europe
Jordan 28.72 (7,982) 20 (4,564) (4.7%). Table 2 enumerates the prevalence estimates of
Lebanon 32.5 (2,480) 19.96 (2,480)
UK 54.9 (3,858) 11.2 (3,639) waterpipe smoking based on region, country (top seven
Germany 13.35 (14,972) 17.8 (12,220) countries), and study population. Table 3 states the preva-
Israel 39.2 (714) 16.4 (714) lence estimates of waterpipe smoking based on the study
Study population School students 11.8 (2,06,765) 4.3 (1,87,616)
University students 31.4 (94,130) 10.04 (92,433) population. The highest burden of ever use and current use
Not specified 19.09 (76,291) 7.43 (62,628) of hookah was among university students.
The results are represented by percentages (numbers).
WHO, World Health Organization; UK, United Kingdom; USA, United States of
America.
Socio-demographic characteristics of individuals
smoking waterpipe
Table 3. Prevalence estimates of waterpipe smoking according to the
population. The key socio-demographic characteristics of individuals
Study population Ever use % (n) 30-day use % (n) smoking waterpipe are as follows:
School students 11.8 (2,06,765) 4.3 (1,87,616)
University students 31.4 (96,750) 10.3 (94,078) i. Age of initiation: The age of initiation of waterpipe
Young professionals and 16.77 (1,06,809) 5.73 (93,157)
not-specified smoking was variable. Twelve out of 16 studies
reported 14–18 years as the age of initiation of water-
pipe smoking.
ii. Country: The prevalence of ever waterpipe smoking
Prevalence of waterpipe smoking
was highest in the UK followed by Israel, Lebanon,
Fifty-nine studies reported the proportion of participants and Jordan. On the other hand, the prevalence of
who ever smoked a waterpipe. The prevalence of ever water- current (30-day) waterpipe smoking was highest in
pipe smoking among 3,77,186 participants from 19 countries Jordan followed by Lebanon and Germany.
was estimated to be 18.16% (95% CI, 18.03–18.29). iii. Gender: Twenty-six studies reported the gender dis-
Fifty-seven out of 59 (80%) studies reported a prevalence of tribution of waterpipe smoking. Nineteen of these
ever smoking of waterpipe of >10%, while six studies studies reported that the prevalence of waterpipe
reported a prevalence of ever use of >50%. Forty studies smoking was higher among males than females [odds
Substance Use & Misuse 7

ratio (OR), 1.2–7.46]. The association of male gender iii. Waterpipe smoking in the family: Five studies
with hookah use was reported in school as well as reported waterpipe smoking in the family (parents/
university students. Six studies found no effect of siblings) as a risk factor for waterpipe smoking (OR,
gender on the prevalence of waterpipe smoking. 1.02–13.87). A study among seventh-grader
Contrarily, two studies reported that waterpipe smok- school-going children in Jordan identified that chil-
ing was more common in females. dren were more likely to initiate waterpipe smoking
iv. Socioeconomic status: Seven studies reported a higher if they were exposed to teachers who smoked (OR,
prevalence of waterpipe smoking among high- and 1.12–3.84).
middle-income groups as compared to the low-income iv. Ethnicity: A study from the UK reported that indi-
group. viduals of nonwhite ethnicities had higher odds of
v. Educational status: The prevalence of both ever and waterpipe smoking (OR, 1.66–3.04). Two studies
current (30-day) waterpipe smoking among univer- from the US found higher use of waterpipe among
sity students was higher than those in school-going individuals of Hispanic Latino ethnicities (OR,
children. A majority of the studies conducted among 1.25–1.85).
school children were performed in the USA (12). v. Area of residence: Six studies reported a higher prev-
alence of WPS use among urban-dwelling individuals
as compared to rural-dwelling ones (OR, 1.06–2.05).
Risk factors associated with waterpipe smoking For women in Pakistan, staying in a rural area was a
risk factor for waterpipe smoking.
The risk factors associated with waterpipe smoking are as
vi. Other socio-cultural/perceptual factors: A study
follows (Table 4):
reported curiosity about waterpipes as a strong influ-
encer of waterpipe smoking (OR, 28.28). Another
i. Cigarette smoking: Six studies reported that water-
study reported low self-perception of academic
pipe smoking strongly predisposes to conventional
achievement as the most significant variable leading
tobacco (e.g. cigarette smoking) in later life (OR,
to regularly smoking waterpipe (OR, 25.97). Seven
1.2–3.4). Twenty-three studies reported cigarette
studies reported social acceptability as a risk factor
smoking as a strong predictor of waterpipe smoking
for waterpipe smoking (OR, 1.54–5.77). A study
(OR, 1.26–30.8) among school students, as well as
among school students from Russia identified school
university students. Six studies reported cigarette
troubles and anger coping strategies as risk factors
smoking in the family as a risk factor for waterpipe
for waterpipe use. Nine studies identified considering
smoking (OR, 1.24–19.02). Seven studies reported
waterpipe smoking as a safe and positive attitude as
cigarette smoking among friends influenced water-
a strong risk factor for the initiation of waterpipe
pipe smoking by the individual (OR, 1.18–12.22). A
smoking (OR, 1.64–3.77). Two studies identified low
study from Germany reported an increased risk of
knowledge about tobacco as a risk factor for water-
cigarette and e-cigarette use among those having a
pipe smoking use. Three studies identified the use of
history of prior waterpipe smoking.
flavored tobacco products, receptivity to tobacco
ii. Alcohol and substance use: Marijuana and illicit drug
companies’ marketing, and perception of higher rates
use were identified as risk factors in eight studies
of tobacco use among peers as risk factors for water-
(OR, 1.03–33.81) Ten studies reported a positive
pipe smoking. A study among adolescents in Iran
association between alcohol use and waterpipe smok-
reported students who perceived that their parents
ing (OR, 1.14–14.81).
would punish them or discuss with them if they
smoked were less likely to be waterpipe smokers.
Table 4. Risk factors of waterpipe smoking.
Odds ratio (range as
reported across
Risk factors studies) Discussion
Cigarette smoking By own 1.26–30.8 Based on 62 studies across 19 countries, we found that the
By family members 1.24–19.02
By friends 1.18–12.22 prevalence of ever waterpipe smoking among the 10–24 years
Alcohol and substance Alcohol 1.14–14.81 age group was 18.16% (95% CI, 18.03–18.29). The prevalence
use Substance use 1.03–33.81 of current (30-day) waterpipe smoking was 6.43% (95% CI,
Waterpipe smoking in Waterpipe smoking in the 1.02–13.87
the family family 6.34–6.50). A majority of the studies were conducted among
Ethnicity Nonwhite 1.66–3.04 school-going students in the last decade 2010–2020. Twelve
Latino 1.25–1.85 out of 59 studies reported a prevalence of >40% and 35 stud-
Residence Urban- 1.06–2.05
Knowledge, attitude, Curiosity about waterpipes 28.28 ies reported a prevalence of >20% of ever waterpipe smoking.
and practice Low self-perception of 25.97 Nineteen studies reported a current (30-day) use prevalence
academic achievement of waterpipe smoking of >10%. The prevalence of ever water-
Social acceptability 1.54–5.77
Considering waterpipe 1.64–3.77 pipe smoking was high in Europe (22.8%), the Americas
smoking as a positive (19.9%), and the eastern Mediterranean region (17.33%). The
attitude prevalence of current (30-day) waterpipe users was highest in
8 S. S. BHARGAVA ET AL.

EMR (9.35%) followed by the Americas (6.91%) and Europe. factors associated with waterpipe use. Three studies also
The age of initiation of waterpipe smoking was variable. The reported that participants who smoked waterpipe used alcohol
prevalence of waterpipe smoking was higher among males, and cigarettes at a higher frequency and quantity, and they
among those who belong to the high- and middle-income reported more severity on measures of problem alcohol and
groups, and among university students. The common risk nicotine use than participants who did not smoke waterpipe
factors of waterpipe smoking included cigarette smoking, (Heinz et al., 2013). Another study evaluating nicotine depen-
alcohol and substance use, waterpipe smoking in the family, dence among adolescent waterpipe smokers in Lebanon
nonwhite ethnicity, and urban-dwelling individuals. reported that nicotine dependency developed among adoles-
Surprisingly, there were no studies from the south-east Asian cent waterpipe smokers at low levels of consumption and fre-
region. There is an unmet need to generate evidence on the quency of use. Another study reported curiosity about
burden and determinants of waterpipe use from this geo- waterpipes as a strong influence on waterpipe smoking (OR,
graphical part, especially in India. Longitudinal nationally 28.28; 95% CI, 22.64–35.33) Another study reported low
representative studies will help in better understanding the self-perception of academic achievement as the most signifi-
epidemiology of this new epidemic, particularly in terms of cant variable that increases the probability of smoking water-
the continued tobacco use habit in later life. pipe regularly (OR, 25.97) (Korn & Magnezi, 2008).
Our results are consistent with another systematic review Participants liked waterpipe smoking because they like its fla-
on waterpipe tobacco smoking which reported a high prev- vor and social environment (46.3% and 29.5% respectively)
alence of Waterpipe tobacco smoking in eastern Mediterranean (Eshah & Froelicher, 2018). A recent systematic review evalu-
and European countries with Lebanon having the highest ating the determinants of waterpipe use among women noted
prevalence estimate for current (30-day) use (Jawad et al., a lack of awareness of the hazardous effects of waterpipe, a
2018). In our study, the prevalence of current (30-day) favorable attitude toward use, and the influence of friends and
waterpipe smoking was highest in Jordan followed by family as significant risk factors contributing to its use
Lebanon and Germany. Another study also reported a higher (Bashirian et al., 2021).
prevalence among youth than among adults. The prevalence In addition to the findings of our study, tobacco industry
of current (30-day) waterpipe smoking was highest in Jordan marketing, peer influence, product appeal based on novelty
followed by Lebanon and Germany while past 30-day use and flavors, perceived social acceptability, perceptions about
was highest among Lebanese youth as per a recent review harm relative to conventional tobacco products, and lack of
(Jawad et al., 2018). The estimate of current (30-day) water- regulation for e-cigarettes and waterpipe have been cited in
pipe smoking (6.18%) is similar to a study among adoles- the literature as a predisposing factor for waterpipe smoking
cents [prevalence, 6.9% (95% CI, 6.4–7.5)] which was based (Wang et al., 2019). The other established factors of use and
on the data from 72 countries that had conducted Global initiation, including the availability of flavors, exposure to
Youth Tobacco Survey from 2010–2019 (C et al., 2022). tobacco product marketing, curiosity and susceptibility, and
Another systematic review evaluating the prevalence of misperceptions about harm from tobacco product use con-
waterpipe smoking noted the highest rate among school stu- tinue to promote tobacco product use among youths (Wang
dents across countries (Akl et al., 2011). et al., 2014). According to the report, there was a connec-
A previous study has shown that, among school-going tion between the use of flavored tobacco products, openness
students, the prevalence of waterpipe smoking increases with to tobacco company advertising, and the belief that their
each grade throughout high school (Barnett et al., 2017). peers had a higher prevalence of tobacco usage (Lee et al.,
Another study has reported the largest increase in waterpipe 2015). In a study among Jordanian adults, the majority of
smoking between ages 18 and 19 years (Pérez et al., 2021). It the participants reported that they smoked a waterpipe for
was also reported that the rates of waterpipe smoking initi- the first time with their friends (66.8%), they usually smoke
ation were highest during the first two months of schooling in the company of others (63.2%), and believe that quitting
(Fielder et al., 2012). Another study on the prevalence and cigarettes smoking is harder than quitting waterpipe smok-
attitudes among medical students in London found that ing (61.6%). More than half (56.7%) of participants have
waterpipe smoking was more common than cigarette smok- extremely poor knowledge about the health effects of water-
ing [current (30-day) 11.0% vs. 6.3%, ever 51.7% vs. 16.8%]. pipe smoking (Eshah & Froelicher, 2018).
A previous systematic review and meta-analysis showed that A wide range of sociocultural factors affects waterpipe
waterpipe use was associated with greater odds of suscepti- smoking among adolescents and young adults. These are
bility to cigarette smoking among adolescents and young primarily socio-cultural norms, gender differences, motiva-
adults who never smoked (Yu et al., 2023). In a study per- tion to smoke, sensory characteristics of waterpipe, meta-
formed in a US university, for more than half (52.9%) of the phors, consumerism, indicators of dependence, comparison
ever-users, waterpipe was the first tobacco product ever between cigarettes and waterpipe, health effect of smoking,
tried by the students. This study demonstrated a progression and intervention (Afifi et al., 2013; Makvandi et al., 2021).
in waterpipe smoking uptake from non-susceptible, to sus- Therefore, interdisciplinary multidimensional strategies are
ceptible, to first use, and to continued use (Roberts & needed for waterpipe smoking management and prevention
Ferketich, 2020). among these at-risk groups. Public education, strict supervi-
The analysis of the included studies showed male gender, sion of tobacco import, export, and selling, ample employ-
cigarette smoking (by self/family/friends), waterpipe smoking ment opportunities for young people, and effective leisure
by family/friends, alcohol use, and illicit substance use as time management are essential to reduce waterpipe smoking.
Substance Use & Misuse 9

The common barriers to de-addiction treatment among Acknowledgments


waterpipe smokers include smoking culture, client resistance,
Dr. Roy Daniels, Senior Resident, Centre for Community Medicine,
the lack of resources, staff smoking, and environmental bar- The All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, for
riers. On the other hand, the facilitators of de-addiction identifying Key words.
treatment include financial support, enhanced leadership,
and state mandates against smoking in addiction treatment
programs (Pagano et al., 2016; Farhoudian et al., 2022). Authors’ contributions
Globally, there is limited attention to waterpipe policies in
SSB conceptualized the review; SSB and HP drafted the study protocol;
various countries because of the inherent complexity. The
HP, DM, SS, and AS were involved in the literature search and study
various national policies in this regard have been reviewed selection; SSB, SD, HP, DM, SS, and AS extracted data from the included
comprehensively earlier (Alaouie et al., 2022). studies; SD and SS performed the risk of bias analyses; HP, DM, and
The strengths of our study include the inclusion of a AS were involved in disagreement resolutions at all stages; SS and CRH
large number (n = 62) studies, the use of a consistent defini- performed all qualitative synthesis; SSB, SD, and SS interpreted the anal-
tion of ever use and current (30-day) use of waterpipe, and yses; SSB, SD, CRH, and SS drafted the review; PCG, JKC, LS, PS,
the inclusion of a wide demographic range of the study pop- VGM, and SRG provided guidance, expert inputs, and updated the final
review. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and had
ulation. However, there are certain limitations to this study.
final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
The studies were reported only from selected regions and
countries and there was a paucity of data from a large part
of the world. There was variability in the study population
Funding
across the various included studies and not all outcomes of
interest were reported in all studies. Notwithstanding these The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work
limitations, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first featured in this article.
systematic review to summarize the burden and risk factors
of waterpipe smoking among adolescents and young adults
across the globe (WHO., 2015). Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the
main article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed
Conclusion to the corresponding author.
To conclude, it was revealed that waterpipe smoking usage
was significantly high among adolescents and young adults.
The prevalence of waterpipe smoking was higher among References
males, among those who belong to the high- and
Abbadi, A., Alnahar, J., Zoghoul, S., Bsoul, A., Alarood, S., Al-Mistarehi,
middle-income groups, and among university students. The A.-H., & Alzyoud, S. (2020). Waterpipe nicotine dependence and
common risk factors of waterpipe smoking included ciga- depressive symptoms among adolescent waterpipe and dual users.
rette smoking, alcohol, and substance use. Waterpipe smok- Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2020, 2364571–2364510.
ing resulted in increased susceptibility to the use of https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2364571
conventional forms of tobacco (e.g. smoking) among those Abbasi-Ghahramanloo, A., Rahimi-Movaghar, A., Zeraati, H., Safiri, S.,
& Fotouhi, A. (2016). Prevalence of hookah smoking and its related
who were never smokers. There is an unmet need to gener- factors among students of Tehran University of Medical Sciences,
ate more global evidence on the burden and determinants of 2012–2013. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,
waterpipe use, especially from south-east Asian countries. 10(2), e4551. https://doi.org/10.17795/ijpbs-4551
Qualitative studies can help in understanding the miscon- Abdo, R., Zeenny, R., & Salameh, P. (2016). Health behaviors among
ceptions about waterpipe smoking and the subsequent initi- school-aged children: A cross sectional study in Lebanese private
schools. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 14(6),
ation of cigarette smoking particularly among the youth. To 1003–1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-016-9677-z
protect adolescents and youth from the waterpipe smoking Abdullah, P., Costanian, C., Khanlou, N., & Tamim, H. (2017).
addiction, tailored awareness programs, public health poli- Prevalence and characteristics of water-pipe smoking in Canada:
cies, and regulations are required. Developing regulatory Results from the Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey. Public
guidelines for water-pipe smoking, surveillance of its use, Health, 148, 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2017.03.007
Abughosh, S., Wu, I.-H., Peters, R. J., Hawari, F., & Essien, E. J. (2012).
intervention, and specific policy frameworks may be consid- Ethnicity and waterpipe smoking among US students. The
ered a public health priority, as Australia is aiming to do in International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease: The Official
the near future (Kirby, 2023). Journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung
Disease, 16(11), 1551–1557. https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.12.0152
Adetona, O., Mok, S., Rajczyk, J., Brinkman, M. C., & Ferketich, A. K.
Declaration of interest (2021). The adverse health effects of waterpipe smoking in adoles-
cents and young adults: A narrative review. Tobacco Induced Diseases,
The authors declare there is no Complete of Interest at this study. 19(October), 81–31. https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/142521
Adolescent and Young Adult Health. (2022). Retrieved October 24, from
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescents-health-
Disclosure statement risks-and-solutions.
Advisory note: waterpipe tobacco smoking: health effects, research
The authors declare no competing interests. needs and recommended actions by regulators. 2nd edition.
10 S. S. BHARGAVA ET AL.

Retrieved October 24, 2022, from https://www.who.int/publications/i/ Farhoudian, A., Razaghi, E., Hooshyari, Z., Noroozi, A., Pilevari, A.,
item/advisory-note-waterpipe-tobacco-smoking-health-effects-resea Mokri, A., Mohammadi, M. R., & Malekinejad, M. (2022). Barriers
rch-needs-and-recommended-actions-by-regulators-2nd-ed. and facilitators to substance use disorder treatment: An overview of
Afifi, R., Khalil, J., Fouad, F., Hammal, F., Jarallah, Y., Abu Farhat, H., systematic reviews. Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment, 16,
Ayad, M., & Nakkash, R. (2013). Social norms and attitudes linked 11782218221118462. https://doi.org/10.1177/11782218221118462
to waterpipe use in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Social Science Fielder, R. L., Carey, K. B., & Carey, M. P. (2012). Prevalence, frequency,
& Medicine (1982), 98, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed. and initiation of hookah tobacco smoking among first-year female
2013.09.007 college students: A one-year longitudinal study. Addictive Behaviors,
Akl, E. A., Gaddam, S., Gunukula, S. K., Honeine, R., Jaoude, P. A., & 37(2), 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.10.001
Irani, J. (2010). The effects of waterpipe tobacco smoking on health Fitzpatrick, M., Johnson, A. C., Tercyak, K. P., Hawkins, K. B., Villanti,
outcomes: A systematic review. International Journal of Epidemiology, A. C., & Mays, D. (2019). Adolescent beliefs about hookah and hoo-
39(3), 834–857. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq002 kah tobacco use and implications for preventing use. Preventing
Akl, E. A., Gunukula, S. K., Aleem, S., Obeid, R., Jaoude, P. A., Chronic Disease, 16, E05. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd16.180093
Honeine, R., & Irani, J. (2011). The prevalence of waterpipe tobacco Galimov, A., El Shahawy, O., Unger, J. B., Masagutov, R., & Sussman,
smoking among the general and specific populations: A systematic S. (2019). Hookah use among Russian adolescents: Prevalence and
review. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 244. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471- correlates. Addictive Behaviors, 90, 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
2458-11-244 addbeh.2018.11.018
Akl, E. A., Ward, K. D., Bteddini, D., Khaliel, R., Alexander, A. C., Lotfi, Ghelichkhani, P., Yaseri, M., Yousefifard, M., Baikpour, M., Asady, H.,
T., Alaouie, H., & Afifi, R. A. (2015). The allure of the waterpipe: A Oraii, A., Rafei, A., & Hosseini, M. (2018). The gap of cigarette and
narrative review of factors affecting the epidemic rise in waterpipe hookah smoking between socioeconomic groups in Iran: Effect of
smoking among young persons globally. Tobacco Control, 24(Suppl 1), inequalities on socioeconomic position. Archives of Iranian Medicine,
i13–i21. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051906 21(9), 418–424.
Alaouie, H., Reddiar, S. K., Tleis, M., Kadi, L. E., Afifi, R. A., & Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs 2013-2020.
Nakkash, R. (2022). Waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) control pol- Retrieved October 24, 2022, from https://www.who.int/publications-
icies: Global analysis of available legislation and equity consider- detail-redirect/9789241506236
ations. Tobacco Control, 31(2), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1136/ Goodwin, R. D., Grinberg, A., Shapiro, J., Keith, D., McNeil, M. P., Taha,
tobaccocontrol-2021-056550 F., Jiang, B., & Hart, C. L. (2014). Hookah use among college students:
Almerie, M. Q., Matar, H. E., Salam, M., Morad, A., Abdulaal, M., Prevalence, drug use, and mental health. Drug and Alcohol Dependence,
Koudsi, A., & Maziak, W. (2008). Cigarettes and waterpipe smoking 141, 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.04.024
among medical students in Syria: A cross-sectional study. The Grinberg, A., & Goodwin, R. D. (2016). Prevalence and correlates of
International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 12(9), 1085– hookah use: A nationally representative sample of US adults ages
1091. 18-40 years old. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse,
Azagba, S., Latham, K., & Shan, L. (2019). Waterpipe tobacco smoking 42(5), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2016.1167214
trends among middle and high school students in the United States Hanewinkel, R., Morgenstern, M., Sargent, J. D., Goecke, M., & Isensee,
from 2011 to 2017. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 200, 19–25. B. (2021). Waterpipe smoking and subsequent cigarette and
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.04.005 e-cigarette use: A cohort study. ERJ Open Research, 7(3), 00371–
Bahelah, R., DiFranza, J. R., Fouad, F. M., Ward, K. D., Eissenberg, T., 2021. https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00371-2021
& Maziak, W. (2016). Early symptoms of nicotine dependence Heinz, A. J., Giedgowd, G. E., Crane, N. A., Veilleux, J. C., Conrad, M.,
among adolescent waterpipe smokers. Tobacco Control, 25(e2), e127– Braun, A. R., Olejarska, N. A., & Kassel, J. D. (2013). A comprehensive
e134. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052809 examination of hookah smoking in college students: Use patterns and
Barnett, T. E., Forrest, J. R., Porter, L., & Curbow, B. A. (2014). A contexts, social norms and attitudes, harm perception, psychological cor-
multiyear assessment of hookah use prevalence among Florida high relates and co-occurring substance use. Addictive Behaviors, 38(11),
school students. Nicotine & Tobacco Research: Official Journal of the 2751–2760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.07.009
Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 16(3), 373–377. https:// Hirpa, S., Fogarty, A., Addissie, A., Bauld, L., Frese, T., Unverzagt, S.,
doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntt188 Kantelhardt, E. J., Getachew, S., & Deressa, W. (2021). An emerging
Barnett, T. E., Tomar, S. L., Lorenzo, F. E., Forrest, J. R., Porter, L., & problem of shisha smoking among high school students in Ethiopia.
Gurka, M. J. (2017). Hookah use among Florida high school stu- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
dents, 2011–2014. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(2), 18(13), 7023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137023
220–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.027 Jaber, R., Madhivanan, P., Veledar, E., Khader, Y., Mzayek, F., &
Bashirian, S., Barati, M., Abasi, H., Sharma, M., & Karami, M. (2018). Maziak, W. (2015). Waterpipe a gateway to cigarette smoking ini-
The role of sociodemographic factors associated with waterpipe tiation among adolescents in Irbid, Jordan: A longitudinal study.
smoking among male adolescents in western Iran: A cross-sectional The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease: The
study. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 16, 29. https://doi.org/10.18332/ Official Journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and
tid/91601 Lung Disease, 19(4), 481–487. https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.14.0869
Bashirian, S., Barati, M., Karami, M., Hamzeh, B., Afshari, M., & Ezati, Jackson, D., & Aveyard, P. (2008). Waterpipe smoking in students:
E. (2021). Determinants of waterpipe smoking among women: A Prevalence, risk factors, symptoms of addiction, and smoke intake.
systematic review. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12, Evidence from one British University. BMC Public Health, 8(1), 174.
25. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_116_20 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-174
Ma, C., Yang, H., Zhao, M., Magnussen, C. G., & Xu, B. (2022). Jamil, H., Elsouhag, D., Hiller, S., Arnetz, J. E., & Arnetz, B. B. (2010).
Prevalence of waterpipe smoking and its associated factors among Sociodemographic risk indicators of hookah smoking among White
adolescents aged 12-16 years in 73 countries/territories. Frontiers in Americans: A pilot study. Nicotine & Tobacco Research: Official
Public Health, 10 Journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 12(5),
Cavazos-Rehg, P. A., Krauss, M. J., Kim, Y., & Emery, S. L. (2015). Risk 525–529. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq026
factors associated with hookah use. Nicotine & Tobacco Research: Jarrett, T., Blosnich, J., Tworek, C., & Horn, K. (2012). Hookah use
Official Journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, among U.S. college students: Results from the National College
17(12), 1482–1490. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntv029 Health Assessment II. Nicotine & Tobacco Research: Official Journal
Eshah, N. F., & Froelicher, E. S. (2018). Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 14(10), 1145–
and patterns of waterpipe use among Jordanian adults who exclu- 1153. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nts003
sively smoke waterpipes. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, Jawad, M., Abass, J., Hariri, A., Rajasooriar, K. G., Salmasi, H., Millett,
17(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515117719592 C., & Hamilton, F. L. (2013). Waterpipe smoking: Prevalence and
Substance Use & Misuse 11

attitudes among medical students in London. The International Makvandi, Z., Mostafavi, F., Bashirian, S., Zamani-Alavijeh, F., & Kelishadi,
Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease: The Official Journal of the R. (2021). Sociocultural factors contributing to waterpipe tobacco smok-
International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 17(1), ing among adolescents and young adult women: A qualitative study in
137–140. https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.12.0175 Iran. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being, 16(1), 1857043.
Jawad, M., Charide, R., Waziry, R., Darzi, A., Ballout, R. A., & Akl, E. Maziak, W. (2011). The global epidemic of waterpipe smoking. Addictive
A. (2018). The prevalence and trends of waterpipe tobacco smoking: Behaviors, 36(1-2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.08.030
A systematic review. PloS One, 13(2), e0192191. https://doi. Maziak, W., Taleb, Z. B., Bahelah, R., Islam, F., Jaber, R., Auf, R., &
org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192191 Salloum, R. G. (2015). The global epidemiology of waterpipe smok-
Jawad, M., Choaie, E., Brose, L., Dogar, O., Grant, A., Jenkinson, E., ing. Tobacco Control, 24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1), i3–i12. https://doi.
McEwen, A., Millett, C., & Shahab, L. (2016). Waterpipe tobacco use org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051903
in the United Kingdom: A cross-sectional study among University McKelvey, K., Attonito, J., Madhivanan, P., Jaber, R., Yi, Q., Mzayek, F.,
Students and Stop Smoking Practitioners. PloS One, 11(1), e0146799. & Maziak, W. (2014). Determinants of waterpipe smoking initiation
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146799 among school children in Irbid, Jordan: A 4-year longitudinal anal-
Jawad, M., & Power, G. (2016). Waterpipe tobacco and electronic ciga- ysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 142, 307–313. https://doi.
rette use in a southeast London adult sample: A cross-sectional anal- org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.06.038
ysis. Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England), 38(2), e114-121– McKelvey, K. L., Wilcox, M. L., Madhivanan, P., Mzayek, F., Khader, Y.
e121. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdv106 S., & Maziak, W. (2013). Time trends of cigarette and waterpipe
Kasza, K. A., Ambrose, B. K., Conway, K. P., Borek, N., Taylor, K., smoking among a cohort of school children in Irbid, Jordan,
Goniewicz, M. L., Cummings, K. M., Sharma, E., Pearson, J. L., 2008-11. European Journal of Public Health, 23(5), 862–867. https://
Green, V. R., Kaufman, A. R., Bansal-Travers, M., Travers, M. J., doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckt140
Kwan, J., Tworek, C., Cheng, Y.-C., Yang, L., Pharris-Ciurej, N., van Miri-Moghaddam, M., Shahrakipour, M., Nasseri, S., & Miri-Moghaddam,
Bemmel, D. M., … Hyland, A. J. (2017). Tobacco-product use by E. (2019). Higher prevalence of water pipe compared to cigarette
adults and youths in the United States in 2013 and 2014. The New smoking among medical students in Southeast Iran. Central European
England Journal of Medicine, 376(4), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1056/ Journal of Public Health, 27(3), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.21101/
NEJMsa1607538 cejph.a5615
Kelishadi, R., Heshmat, R., Shahsanai, A., Djalalinia, S., Motlagh, M. E., Mzayek, F., Khader, Y., Eissenberg, T., Al Ali, R., Ward, K. D., & Maziak,
Keikha, M., Ardalan, G., Najafi, F., Khoramdad, M., Asayesh, H., & W. (2012). Patterns of water-pipe and cigarette smoking initiation in
Qorbani, M. (2016). Determinants of tobacco and hookah smoking schoolchildren: Irbid longitudinal smoking study. Nicotine & Tobacco
in a nationally representative sample of Iranian children and adoles- Research: Official Journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and
cents: The CASPIAN-IV study. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, Tobacco, 14(4), 448–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntr234
18(8), e31099. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.31099 Nădăşan, V., Foley, K. L., Pénzes, M., Paulik, E., Mihăicuţă, Ş., Ábrám,
Khan, M. T., Hashmi, S., Zaheer, S., Aslam, S. K., Khan, N. A., Aziz, H., Z., Bálint, J., & Urbán, R. (2016). Use of electronic cigarettes and
Rashid, N., & Shafique, K. (2015). Burden of waterpipe smoking and alternative tobacco products among Romanian adolescents.
chewing tobacco use among women of reproductive age group using International Journal of Public Health, 61(2), 199–207. https://doi.
data from the 2012-13 Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey. BMC org/10.1007/s00038-015-0774-8
Public Health, 15(1), 1113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2433-7 Naicker, N., Teare, J., Albers, P., & Mathee, A. (2020). Prevalence of
Kheirallah, K. A., Alzyoud, S., & Ward, K. D. (2015). Waterpipe use and hookah pipe smoking in high-school learners in Johannesburg,
cognitive susceptibility to cigarette smoking among never-cigarette South Africa. South African Medical Journal, 110(6), 546–551.
smoking Jordanian youth: Analysis of the 2009 Global Youth Tobacco Noonan, D., Kulbok, P., & Yan, G. (2011). Intention to smoke tobacco
Survey. Nicotine & Tobacco Research: Official Journal of the Society for using a waterpipe among students in a southeastern U.S. College.
Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 17(3), 280–284. https://doi. Public Health Nursing (Boston, Mass.), 28(6), 494–502. https://doi.
org/10.1093/ntr/ntu140 org/10.1111/j.1525-1446.2011.00945.x
Kirby, T. (2023). Australia to introduce sweeping e-cigarette regulations. Obaid, H. A., Hassan, M. A., Mahdy, N. H., El Disouky, M. I., Alzarba,
Lancet (London, England), 401(10388), 1557. https://doi.org/10.1016/ F. E., Alnayeemi, S. R., Rillera, M. C., & Al Mazrooei, B. S. (2014).
S0140-6736(23)00954-6 Tobacco use and associated factors among school students in Dubai,
Klosterhalfen, S., Kotz, D., Boeckmann, M., & Kastaun, S. (2020). Waterpipe 2010: Intervention study. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal,
use and associated consumer characteristics in the German population: 20(12), 765–773. https://doi.org/10.26719/2014.20.12.765
Data from a national representative survey (DEBRA study). Addictive Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Retrieved October 24, 2022, from
Behaviors, 110, 106542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106542 https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
Korn, L., & Magnezi, R. (2008). Cigarette and nargila (water pipe) use Pagano, A., Tajima, B., & Guydish, J. (2016). Barriers and facilitators to
among Israeli Arab high school students: Prevalence and determi- tobacco cessation in a nationwide sample of addiction treatment
nants of tobacco smoking. TheScientificWorldJournal, 8, 517–525. programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 67, 22–29. https://
https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2008.71 doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2016.04.004
Kulak, J. A., Saddleson, M. L., Travers, M. J., Bansal-Travers, M., Palamar, J. J., Zhou, S., Sherman, S., & Weitzman, M. (2014). Hookah
Homish, G. G., Mahoney, M. C., & Giovino, G. A. (2018). Examining use among U.S. high school seniors. Pediatrics, 134(2), 227–234.
hookah as an introduction to nicotine products among college stu- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-0538
dents. Substance Use & Misuse, 53(11), 1869–1877. https://doi.org/10 Pérez, A., Kuk, A. E., Bluestein, M. A., Harrell, M. B., Perry, C. L., &
.1080/10826084.2018.1441308 Chen, B. (2021). Prospective estimation of the age of initiation of
Lee, Y. O., Hebert, C. J., Nonnemaker, J. M., & Kim, A. E. (2015). hookah use among youth: Findings from the Population Assessment
Youth tobacco product use in the United States. Pediatrics, 135(3), of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study waves 1-4 (2013-2017). Addictive
409–415. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-3202 Behaviors, 117, 106838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106838
Linde, B. D., Ebbert, J. O., Pasker, C. K., Wayne Talcott, G., Schroeder, Primack, B. A., Walsh, M., Bryce, C., & Eissenberg, T. (2009). Water-pipe
D. R., Hanson, A. C., & Klesges, R. C. (2015). Prevalence and pre- tobacco smoking among middle and high school students in Arizona.
dictors of hookah use in US Air Force military recruits. Addictive Pediatrics, 123(2), e282–288. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-1663
Behaviors, 47, 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.03.012 Reveles, C. C., Segri, N. J., & Botelho, C. (2013). Factors associated
Little, M. A., Fahey, M. C., Wang, X.-Q., Talcott, G. W., McMurry, T., with hookah use initiation among adolescents. Jornal de Pediatria,
& Klesges, R. C. (2021). Trends in tobacco use among young adults 89(6), 583–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2013.08.001
presenting for military service in the United States air force between Roberts, M. E., & Ferketich, A. K. (2020). Hookah susceptibility and
2013 and 2018. Substance Use & Misuse, 56(3), 370–376. https://doi. transitions over the first year of college. Journal of Studies on Alcohol
org/10.1080/10826084.2020.1868517 and Drugs, 81(2), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2020.81.195
12 S. S. BHARGAVA ET AL.

Roods, K., Jasek, J., & Farley, S. M. (2018). Trends in hookah use Sterling, K. L., & Mermelstein, R. (2011). Examining hookah smoking
among New York City middle and high school students, 2008–2014. among a cohort of adolescent ever smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco
Preventing Chronic Disease, 15, E20. https://doi.org/10.5888/ Research: Official Journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and
pcd15.170283 Tobacco, 13(12), 1202–1209. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntr146
Roohafza, H., Kasaei, Z., Heidari, K., Omidi, R., Alinia, T., Naji, M., Varsano, S., Ganz, I., Eldor, N., & Garenkin, M. (2003). Water-pipe
Jaberifar, M., & Sadeghi, M. (2015). Better view on attitudes and tobacco smoking among school children in Israel: Frequencies, hab-
perceived parental reactions behind waterpipe smoking among its, and attitudes. Harefuah, 142(11), 736–741, 807.
Iranian students. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: The Official Villanti, A. C., Cobb, C. O., Cohn, A. M., Williams, V. F., & Rath, J.
Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 20(11), 1032–1038. M. (2015). Correlates of hookah use and predictors of hookah trial
https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-1995.172812 in U.S. young adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 48(6),
Ross, J. C., Suerken, C. K., King, J. L., Wiseman, K. D., Noar, S. M., 742–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.01.010
Wagoner, K. G., & Sutfin, E. L. (2018). Adolescents’ first tobacco Wang, B., King, B. A., Corey, C. G., Arrazola, R. A., & Johnson, S. E.
product: Results from a nationally representative survey. Tobacco (2014). Awareness and use of non-conventional tobacco products
Regulatory Science, 4(3), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.18001/TRS.4.3.4 among U.S. students, 2012. American Journal of Preventive Medicine,
Salih, S., Shaban, S., Athwani, Z., Alyahyawi, F., Alharbi, S., Ageeli, F., 47(2 Suppl 1), S36–S52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.05.003
Hakami, A., Ageeli, A., Jubran, O., & Sahloli, S. (2020). Prevalence, Wang, L., Chen, J., Leung, L. T., Ho, S. Y., Lam, T. H., & Wang, M. P.
predictors, and characteristics of waterpipe smoking among Jazan (2021). Use patterns of cigarettes and alternative tobacco products and
University Students in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. Annals socioeconomic correlates in Hong Kong secondary school students.
of Global Health, 86(1), 87. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 17253. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96452-y
Salloum, R. G., Haider, M. R., Barnett, T. E., Guo, Y., Getz, K. R., Wang, T. W., Gentzke, A. S., Creamer, M. R., Cullen, K. A.,
Thrasher, J. F., & Maziak, W. (2016). Waterpipe tobacco smoking Holder-Hayes, E., Sawdey, M. D., Anic, G. M., Portnoy, D. B., Hu,
and susceptibility to cigarette smoking among young adults in the S., Homa, D. M., Jamal, A., & Neff, L. J. (2019). Tobacco product
United States, 2012–2013. Preventing Chronic Disease, 13, E24. use and associated factors among middle and high school students
https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd13.150505 - United States, 2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
Sharma, E., Bansal-Travers, M., Edwards, K. C., Halenar, M. J., Taylor, K. A., Surveillance Summaries (Washington, D.C.: 2002), 68(12), 1–22.
Kasza, K. A., Day, H., Hammad, H. T., Anic, G., Limpert, J., Gardner, L. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6812a1
D., Borek, N., Kimmel, H. L., Compton, W. M., Hyland, A., & Stanton, Ward, K. D. (2015). The waterpipe: An emerging global epidemic in
C. A. (2020). Longitudinal pathways of exclusive and polytobacco hookah need of action. Tobacco Control, 24(Suppl 1), i1–i2. https://doi.
use among youth, young adults and adults in the USA: Findings from the org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052203
PATH Study Waves 1-3 (2013-2016). Tobacco Control, 29(Suppl 3), s155– Waziry, R., Jawad, M., Ballout, R. A., Al Akel, M., & Akl, E. A. (2017).
s162. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055625 The effects of waterpipe tobacco smoking on health outcomes: An
Shepardson, R. L., & Hustad, J. T. P. (2016). Hookah tobacco smoking updated systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of
during the transition to college: Prevalence of other substance use Epidemiology, 46(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw021
and predictors of initiation. Nicotine & Tobacco Research: Official WHO Global report on trends in prevalence of tobacco smoking
Journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 18(5), (2015). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Retrieved October
763–769. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntv170 22, 2025, from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/156262/1/9
Smith, J. R., Novotny, T. E., Edland, S. D., Hofstetter, C. R., Lindsay, S. 789241564922_eng.pdf?ua=1.
P., & Al-Delaimy, W. K. (2011). Determinants of hookah use among Yu, Z., Wang, M., & Fu, J. (2023). Association between waterpipe use
high school students. Nicotine & Tobacco Research: Official Journal of and susceptibility to cigarette smoking among adolescents and young
the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 13(7), 565–572. adults who never smoked: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntr041 Tobacco Induced Diseases, 21, 29. https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/159621

View publication stats

You might also like