Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Original Article
Abstract
Introduction: We aimed to assess the status of sensory processing in children with attention deficit and
hyperactivity disorder, high-functioning autism and typical peers.
Methods: Participants in this study are children 7 to 10 years old with attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder (n = 30), autistic children with high cognitive function (n = 28) and 30 matched typical children.
Parents of children in all the groups have completed the Dunn sensory profile questionnaire (SP).
Results: The results of the present study showed that children in high-functioning autism and normal
sensory processes act different. The autistic children differ in sensory seeking, emotional reactivity, low
muscle tone and endurance, oral sensory sensitive, inattention and distractibility, poor sensory registration,
sensory sensitivity, fine movement/perception. Children with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder differ
in seven factors of the nine factors. These factors were sensory seeking, emotional reactivity, low muscle tone
and endurance, inattention and distractibility, poor sensory registration, sensory sensitivity, fine
movement/perception.
Conclusion: Different sensory processing function in these children may explain their abnormal
behaviors. This sensory processing dysfunction affects on child's daily life in areas such as play, academic
skills, peer relationships, and self-help activities. Therapists should consider the child's sensory processing
functions when they set therapeutic planes.
Declaration of Interest: None.
Keywords: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Autism high function, Sensory processing. 1
Sensory processing is defined as registration, their siblings’ show that children with ADHD,
modulation, integration and organizing sensory girls with ADHD show tactile defensiveness more
inputs (6). Sensory processing disorder is defining than boys with ADHD, but ADHD boys didn’t
difficulties in regulation and organizing the variety show any significant difference compare with
and intensity of responses to sensory input for normal croups (17). Another study suggests that
compliance with environmental requirements (7). ADHD children show under responsively in
Children, who have sensory processing disorder, auditory system (18). Yochman et al. (2004)
show abnormal sensory responses, such as under suggested that ADHD children respond to sensory
or over responsively, to sensory stimuli (8). stimuliare significantly different from healthy
Sensory processing disorder in children with children. These differences are evident in the six-
autistic disorder is in a rangebetween 42-95% factor of 9sensory scale factor and emotional
based on case studies have been reported (8,9). responses. Behavioral and sensory processing is
ADHD children compared to normal children sensory modulation based on 11ofthe14 sections
show more abnormalities in the sensory sensory profile questioner different from healthy
modulation in both the physiological assessment children (19).
and parents reporting (10). From the perspective Several studies in response to sensory stimuli in
of sensory processing, children with ADHD may the ASD population are done (20,21,9). This
not properly receive and process sensory response include over responsivity, under
information. Therefore, they have difficulties in responsivity, Sensory seeking. All seven sensory
creating adaptive responses in home or social domains specially auditory, visual, tactile and
settings (11). Neu (1997) suggested that more proprioceptive may indicate dysfunctions. These
activity, less adaptive abilities and low sensory abnormal sensory processing patterns recognized
threshold in infancy is associated with higher rate as sensory modulation disorder, which is related to
of ADHD in later ages (12). arousal level. Studies used parental questioners;
Empirical evidence and assumptions are suggest that rate of sensory processing dysfunction
highlighted with sensory processing and in autistic children than other psychological
dysfunction among children with ADHD (13). disorders (8,22). Baranek et al. (2005) observed 3
Both sensory modulation disorder and ADHD sensory processing patterns in autistic children.
include hyperactivity and impulsive behaviors and These patterns pare wise incompatible and often
a high percentage of children with ADHD haves have a coincidence (23). Although ASD diagnostic
sensory processing disorders (14). criteria do not include sensory processing deficits,
ADHD in children is reported too sensitive to many articles have reported sensory processing
sensory stimuli in infancy and can be easily abnormalities in children with ASD. Several
dismayed by environmental changes (15). Further, research groups have reported sensory modulation
children with ADHD behavioral show behavioral problems, which include both under and over
evidence of difficulties in sensory modulation responsiveness to sensory stimuli in autistic
response to sensory inputs and particularly show children (23,24,25). Pfeiffer et al. (2005) reported
over responsivity compared to normal children a strong relationship between the tactile defensive
(16). Another study of children with ADHD and and anxiety in children with Asperger (26).
29 International Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences (IJABS), volume 1, number 1, summer 2014; Journals. smbu.ac.ir/ijabs
Dehghan, Mirzakhany, AlizadeZarei, et al.
International Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences (IJABS), volume 1, number 1, summer 2014; Journals. smbu.ac.ir/ijabs 30
Sensory processing in children with ADHD
Factor 1 (sensory seeking): the child shows a need Factor 8 (sedentary): indicates the preference of
to a variety of sensory stimuli. Based on the child is the type of activity. Based on
questionnaire standard scoring, children whose questionnaire standard scoring, children whose
scores are low on this factor need lots of different scores are low on this factor, indicating that the
sensory stimuli. child prefers quiet and sitting activities.
Factor 2 (emotional reactivity): shows children's Factor 9 (fine movement/perception): indicates the fine
reactions to emotional-social issues. Based on baby status. Based on questionnaire standard scoring,
questionnaire standard scoring, children whose children whose scores are low on this factor, indicating
scores are low on this factor, shows severe reaction poor eye and hand coordination for children.
on emotional issues like failure, fear and anxiety. The questionnaire filling and completion time by
Factor 3 (low muscle tone and endurance): shows the childcare provider is 15 to 20 minutes and
muscle endurance of the child on different score time for specialist is 30 minutes. Cronbach's
activities. Based on questionnaire standard alpha coefficient for all of the parts is obtained
scoring, children whose scores are low on this between 47 to 91 (32).
factor, indicating that the child has little tolerance
in everyday activities and gets tired easily. Results
Test the hypothesis, given the number of variable
Factor 4 (oral sensory sensitive): oral sensory
sand data obtained from measurement to multivariate
processing in children's shows. Based on
analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used. The first
questionnaire standard scoring, children whose
hypothesis: there is a difference of 9-factors between
scores are low on this factor, indicating the child
normal and ASDHF children (table 1).
has a high sensitivity to the taste, smell and
The second hypothesis: there is a difference of 9
temperature of the food.
factors between normal and ASDHF children
Factor 5 (inattention and distractibility): represents
(table 2). The third hypothesis: between children
the focus of the child's daily activities. Based on
with autism and ADHD sensory, there is a
questionnaire standard scoring, children whose
difference in terms of factors 9 (table 3).
scores are low on this factor, indicate that the child
quickly loses its focus because of environmental
Conclusion
factors and is not able to continue activities. The first research question was whether the two
Factor 6 (poor sensory registration): child doesn’t ASDHF and ADHD have different sensory
register sensory stimuli enough. Based on processing from normal children. As the results
questionnaire standard scoring, children whose have shown, children with ADHD and ASDHF
scores are low on this factor, indicating that the have different sensory processing from normal
child does not understand sensory stimuli enough. children. The results of this study showed that
Factor 7 (sensory sensitivity): children register children in the ASDHF and normal group act
high sensory stimuli. Based on questionnaire different in sensory processing. These children
standard scoring, children, whose scores are low were different at the components of sensory
on this factor, indicating that children record high seeking, emotional reactivity, low muscle tone and
intensity vestibular and proprioceptive sensory endurance, oral sensory sensitivity, inattention
stimuli and show sever reaction on it.
31 International Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences (IJABS), volume 1, number 1, summer 2014; Journals. smbu.ac.ir/ijabs
Dehghan, Mirzakhany, AlizadeZarei, et al.
International Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences (IJABS), volume 1, number 1, summer 2014; Journals. smbu.ac.ir/ijabs 32
Sensory processing in children with ADHD
and distractibility, poor sensory registration and like throwing things tight. Some of these children
fine motor sensory perceptions. do not understand the situation of their body organs
A similar pattern in other studies of children with except with severe proprioceptive stimuli. These
autism is expressed (8,30,35). However, the results behaviors may be interpreted as aggressive
are inconsistent with studies of Ermerand Dunn behavior. These children go up the high places,
(1998), which have reported the incidence of low running and are stirring to receive stimuli
sensation-seeking behavior in a small sample of equilibrium. These behaviors together interferes
children with autism (36). children sit to learn in school, playing with peers,
ADHD children showed different functions in self-care activities and may increase child's
seven factors of SP questionnaire nine factors. environmental failure (39).
These factors are emotional reactivity, low muscle ASDHF samples children showed oral sensory
tone and endurance, inattention and distractibility, sensitivity. This means that these children are
poor sensory registration, sensory sensitivity and sensitive to food flavor and texture of foods
sedentary. (hardness and softness). This makes these children
The results are consistent with the study of Yachmn do not have a good diet and eat only a limited
et al. 2004. The sensory systems processed in, variety of foods (40).
affect the child's ability to respond compliant. A However, what is important for clinical work
child will not absorb every sense that is received correlate these findings with the daily challenges of
passively. A child chose sensory stimulus that these children. Weakness of sensory processing,
needs to achieve his purpose in that time and place. causing a mismatch between environmental needs
This is sensory integration and when this process is of the child and his inner emotional needs (41) and
successful, the child can organize a successful and can cause weakness in the child's ability to work
purposeful action on the environment that is called with others and engage in related activities in a
adapted response (37). sustainable basis.
Based on the Dunn pattern if a child has The second research question was whether children
impairment in sensory registration, he will need with ADHD and ASDHF show different sensory
more intensive stimuli to participate and respond to performance in sensory profile questionnaire? The
it. Children who are in a low arousal state and have results show the performance of these two groups
inadequate emotional records they do not capture differs from each other in the sensory situation. The
changes in environment and so, accommodative differences are significant in sensation seeking and
response will not occur (38). These children require fine components/perception.
more sensory stimulation in certain sensory ADHD children have lower performance in seeking
modalities such as proprioception and balance. For sensory component (mean score 57.63) than
instance, in a deep sense, these children usually ASDHF children (mean score 66.14) and level of
seek for active resistance to muscle stimulation, sensation-seeking behaviors is higher in these
deep palpation, or joint push and pull. For example, children.
hitting legs instead of walking, intentional failure, One of the characteristics of ADHD children is
collision with objects or other people, or pushing impulsivity. Impulsivity in ADHD often explained
big objects. They may do some serious throwing as incorrect executive functions (EFs). In general
33 International Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences (IJABS), volume 1, number 1, summer 2014; Journals. smbu.ac.ir/ijabs
Dehghan, Mirzakhany, AlizadeZarei, et al.
terms, impulsivity means act without thinking and 2. Khoshabi K, Puretemad H, Homan A,
inability for planning. In the literature impulsivity Biglariyan A, Tofigh. Prevalence of attention
is a heterogeneous concept that is described with deficit and hyperactivity disorder and
terms such as quick response, sensation seeking, comorbid disorders in primary school
risk seeking, freshness seeking, boldness, and students in Tehran. University of welfare and
errantry (42). Sensation-seeking behaviors in rehabilitation science 2003.
children with ADHD can be aggravated by
3. Mannuzza S, Klein RG, Bessler A, Malloy P,
impulsivity.
LaPadula M. Adult psychiatric status of
Fine movement/perception factor in Dunn
hyperactive boys grown up. American Journal
questionnaire just has 3-question about matching
of Psychiatry 1998; 155: 493–8.
puzzle and hand fine movement. Results show that
4. American Psychiatric Association.
children with ADHD (mean 9.80) have lower
Diagnostic and statistical manual of
performance than the children of ASDHF (mean
mental disorders (4th ed., Text revision).
11.64). Due to low number of queries of this
Washington DC: American Psychiatric
component we cannot accurately judge the fine
Association 2000.
movement/perception and understanding of this
group based on this questionnaire. The results of 5. Crane L, Goddard L, &Pring L. Sensory
this study suggest that occupational therapists processing in adults with autism spectrum
consider emotional needs of children in developing disorders. Autism, 2009; 13:215–228.
treatment protocols for children with ADHD and 6. Miller LJ, Lane SJ. Towards a consensus in
ASD. To inform families about their children's terminology in sensory integration theory and
emotional state can provide a better understanding practice: Part 1: Taxonomy of
of why children behave like this. Adapting and neurophysiological processes. Sensory
modifying the child's living environment by taking Integration Special Interest Section Quarterly
the functional status of the child can lead to better 2000; 23:1–4.
performance. Obviously, the outcome of the status 7. Miller LJ, Anzalone ME, Lane SJ, Cermak
of children’s behavior, sensory processing, SA, &Osten ET. Concept evolution in sensory
cognitive skills, psychological factors, parenting integration: A proposed nosology for
styles, and other factors are effective. Therefore,
diagnosis. American Journal of Occupational
therapists must be detailed and comprehensive
Therapy, 2007; 61(2),135–140.
compilation of various therapeutic approaches such
8. Kientz MA, & Dunn WA comparison of
as sensory integration, perceptual-motor activities,
the performance of children with and
behavioral therapy and etc. to be used.
without autism on the Sensory Profile.
International Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences (IJABS), volume 1, number 1, summer 2014; Journals. smbu.ac.ir/ijabs 34
Comparison of sensory processing in children with
35 International Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences (IJABS), volume 1, number 1, summer 2014; Journals. smbu.ac.ir/ijabs
Dehghan, Mirzakhany, AlizadeZarei, et al.
International Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences (IJABS), volume 1, number 1, summer 2014; Journals. smbu.ac.ir/ijabs 36
Comparison of sensory processing in children with
37 International Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences (IJABS), volume 1, number 1, summer 2014; Journals. smbu.ac.ir/ijabs