Planning variances arise from inaccurate planning or faulty standards, while operational variances result from favorable or unfavorable performance compared to revised standards. A material price planning variance provides feedback on estimating skills, while an operational variance measures purchasing efficiency given market conditions. Variance analysis highlights controllable and uncontrollable variances, and operational variances provide a fairer reflection of actual performance. However, variance analysis may not be appropriate for modern manufacturing using just-in-time and total quality management approaches due to customized small batch production, automation, emphasis on continuous improvement over standards, and need for more detailed information for effective control.
Planning variances arise from inaccurate planning or faulty standards, while operational variances result from favorable or unfavorable performance compared to revised standards. A material price planning variance provides feedback on estimating skills, while an operational variance measures purchasing efficiency given market conditions. Variance analysis highlights controllable and uncontrollable variances, and operational variances provide a fairer reflection of actual performance. However, variance analysis may not be appropriate for modern manufacturing using just-in-time and total quality management approaches due to customized small batch production, automation, emphasis on continuous improvement over standards, and need for more detailed information for effective control.
Planning variances arise from inaccurate planning or faulty standards, while operational variances result from favorable or unfavorable performance compared to revised standards. A material price planning variance provides feedback on estimating skills, while an operational variance measures purchasing efficiency given market conditions. Variance analysis highlights controllable and uncontrollable variances, and operational variances provide a fairer reflection of actual performance. However, variance analysis may not be appropriate for modern manufacturing using just-in-time and total quality management approaches due to customized small batch production, automation, emphasis on continuous improvement over standards, and need for more detailed information for effective control.
- Variances which have arisen because of inaccurate planning or faulty standards. - Compares original standard with a revised standard that should or would have used - Not controllable by management.
2) Operational Variances
- Variances which have been caused adverse or favourable operational performance, compared with a standard which has been revised in hindsight - Compares actual result with the revised standard. - Controllable by management.
Planning and operational variances for materials and labour
- A material price planning variance is really useful to provide feedback on ust how skilled managers are in estimating future prices.
- he operational variance is more meaningful as it measures the purchasing
T department’s efficiency given the market conditions that prevailed at that time.
- It ignores factors which cannot be controlled by the purchasing department. Advantages Disadvantages
1.The analysis highlights variances which 1. What should a realistic/achievable
re controllable and noncontrollable a tandard be? s
. Mangers acceptance of the use of
2 . It may become to easy to justify all the 2 variances for performance measurement variances due to bad planning and motivation
. The planning and standard setting
3 . Revising and analyzing variances into 3 processes should improve planning and operational can be costly
. Operational variances will provide a
4 . Do managers us correctly this 4 ‘fairer’ reflection of actual performance. meaningful info? - Variance analysis may not be appropriate in modern manufacturing companies because : 1. Standard costs apply to manufacturing environments in which quantifies of an identical product are output from the production process. 2. It is doubtful whether standard costing is of much value for performance setting and control in automated manufacturing environments. 3. Variances are the difference between actual performance and standard, measured in cost terms 4. Standard costing and adherence to a preset standard is inconsistent with the concept of continuous improvement, which is applied within TQM and JIT environments. 5. Variance analysis is often carried out on an aggregate bias (total material usage variance, total labour efficiency variance and so on) but in complex and constantly changing business environments more detailed information is required for effective management control. 6. Shorter product life cycles in the modern business environment mean that standard costs will need to be reviewed and updated frequently.
Key features of operating in a JIT and TQM environment.
1. High level of automation 2. High levels of overheads and low levels of direct labour costs 3. Customized products produced in small batches 4. Low stock 5. Emphasis on quality.