The topic of keeping animals in zoos is a controversial issue that has sparked debates

worldwide. While some argue that zoos provide a safe and controlled environment for animals,
others argue that it is unethical to keep animals confined in such small spaces. This essay will
explore both sides of the argument.
On one hand, zoos can provide a safe environment for animals, particularly endangered
species. Zoos provide animals with access to food, shelter, and medical care, which they may not
receive in the wild. For example, many zoos have breeding programs for endangered species that
help to preserve their populations.
However, on the other hand, keeping animals in zoos can be cruel and unethical. Animals are
confined to small spaces, limiting their freedom to roam and engage in natural behaviors. For
instance, many animals in zoos suffer from behavioral problems such as pacing, which is a sign of
stress.
There are many arguments against keeping animals in the zoo, the conditions in which animals
are kept in zoos can be inadequate. For instance, some zoos may not have enough space or
resources to properly care for the animals in their care. This can lead to health problems and a
decrease in the animal's quality of life.
In conclusion, while zoos provide a safe environment for animals, it is essential to consider the
ethical implications of confining animals to small spaces. To sum up It is important that zoos
prioritize the welfare of animals and provide them with the appropriate living conditions. As a
personal opinion, I believe that zoos should only be used for the rehabilitation of injured or sick
animals, or for endangered species breeding programs. Animals should be kept in environments
that are as close to their natural habitat as possible, with access to adequate space and
resources.