Nature and Science, 1(1), 2003, Ma, Nature of Time and Space

The Nature of Time and Space

Hongbao Ma

Department of Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA, hongbao@msu.edu

Abstract: Related to human activities, there are two aspects of the world: One is the observed world
(epistemology) and the other is the existed world (ontology). This article discusses the nature of time and
space from the epistemological and the ontological aspects. From the epistemology angle, time and space
are relative (observed). From the ontology angle, time and space are absolute (existed) and the universe is a
timeless world, which means that all the past, the present and the future exist eternally. [Nature and Science
2003;1(1):1-11].

Key words: time; space; nature; universe; ontology; epistemology

Contents and measurement, etc. For the existed world, it is related

1. Introduction to ontology, naturalism, materialism, physical entity,
2. Newton’s Concepts and existence, etc.
3. Classical Relativity According to Webster’s Dictionary: “Time – The
4. Special Relativity system of those sequential relations that any event has
5. General Relativity to any other, as past, present, or future; indefinite and
6. Quantum Mechanics continuous duration regarded as that in which events
7. Simultaneous Events succeed one another”; “Space – The unlimited or
8. Time Dilation incalculably great three-dimensional realm or expanse
9. Lorentz Contraction in which all material objects are located and all events
10. Gravity and Light occur” (Webster’s, 2003). According to the New
11. Gravitational Waves Webster’s Dictionary: “Time - The measure of duration.
12. Big Bang A particular part or point of duration”; “Space:
13. Black Hole Extension. Internal between points or objects quantity of
14. Twin Paradox time” (New Webster’s, 2003). As another reference,
15. Length Paradox according to the Hyperdictionary: “Time is the
16. Probability Paradox (Oppugn the Second Law of continuum of experience in which events pass from the
Thermodynamics) future through the present to the past” (Hyperdictionary,
17. Uncertainty Principle 2003). From the definitions we can see that the time and
18. Three-dimensional Time space have both the observed (measure) and existed
19. The Measurement of Time (duration and extension) characterizations.
20. Absolute Time and Space The modern physics is mostly talking about the
21. Timeless World measured time and space with observations and
22. Determinism mathematics, but ignoring the existed time and space
23. Discussions and Conclusions (Hawking, 1996). According to the relativity, a traveler
could see that the time and the space are shrink as
1. Introduction his/her observation, if it is true. But he/she cannot
Does the past still exist? Where is the past? Does the change the time and space. The time and space are still
future exist already and wait us to meet? Does the life the same time and space no matter there is a traveler to
still exist after death? What is time? What is space? Is observe it or not. The time and space do not shrink, but
there an absolute time or space in the universe or not? St the observer feels them shrink. There are essential
Augustine, who died in AD 430, said: “If nobody asks conflicts of the time and space concepts between the
me, I know what time is, but if I am asked then I am at a observed and existed aspects. If we only think about the
loss what to say” (Barbour, 2000; Folger, 2000). This measured world, including time and space that are
answer is true for most of the people on the earth. measured by human, we should say that there is nothing
Related to human’s activities, there are two aspects of if the measurers die.
the world: One is the observed world and the other is In this article, I will describe and discuss the nature of
the existed world. For the observed world concept, it is time and space from both the observed aspect and the
related to epistemology, empiricism, idealism, existed aspect.
mentalism, immaterialism, spiritualism, subjectivity,

http://www.sciencepub.net 1 editor@sciencepub.net
 Nature and Science, 1(1), 2003, Ma, Nature of Time and Space
2. Newton’s Concepts
In 1687, Sir Isaac Newton (1/4/1643-3/31/1727) created
precise notions of time, space and motion. Newton’s
time and space concept is absolute. According to
Newton’s theory, time flows with perfect uniformity
forever and space is a limitless container. Nothing in the
universe affects the time’s flow. The space stretches
from infinity to infinity. The time and space are more
fundamental than matters. It can be imagined as an
empty world without matter but not a matter world
without time and space. All the things in the Newtonian
world are at definite positions and conditions. All the
things in the universe move through absolute space
according to the definite laws of motion. If all the
conditions of the universe are known at some instant,
the laws determine all the future movements, and also
all the history of the universe can be known. This is so
called mechanical determinism. Even though the
Newton’s mechanical determinism has been criticized
by relativity and quantum theories, it is still considered
as the true verity of the objective world from the
ontological angle.
3. Classic Relativity
Motion is observed when something moves relatively to
other things. Observers moving relatively to each other
report different descriptions for the motion of an object,
but the objects obey the same laws of motion regardless
of reference system. The laws of physics are the same in
all inertial reference systems (Galilean principle of
relativity). For example, measurements in one inertial
reference system yield the same forces as measurements
in any other inertial reference system.
Observers in different reference systems can reconcile
different velocities they obtain for an object by adding
the relative velocity of the reference systems to that of
the object (However, this procedure breaks down for the
velocities near that of the light according the Einstein’s
special relativity). In a reference system accelerating
relatively to an inertial reference system, the law of
inertia does not work without the introduction of
fictitious forces that are due entirely to the accelerated
motion. Centrifugal force arises in rotating reference
systems and is an example of inertial forces. The earth
is noninertial reference system as it rotates always.
4. Special Relativity
In 1905, Albert Einstein (3/14/1879-4/18/1955) set up
the special relativity with the two basic postulates:
1. The laws of physics are the same in all inertial
reference systems.
2. The speed of light in a vacuum is a constant
value regardless of the speed of the source or
the speed of the observers.
The first postulate says that there is no absolute space
and any inertial reference system is just as good as any
http://www.sciencepub.net
other. This is a reaffirmation of the Galilean principle of
relativity. According to Galilean’s classical relativity, a
traveler in a ship moving with a constant velocity could
not conduct experiments that would determine whether
the ship is moving or at rest. However, a theory by the
Scottish physicist James Clerk Maxwell describing the
behavior of electromagnetic waves, such as light and
radio, yielded unexpected results. In Newton’s laws,
reference systems moving at constant velocities are
equivalent to each other. However, if one system
accelerates relatively to another, the two reference
systems are not equivalent. The Newton’s laws depend
on acceleration and not on the velocity. The acceleration
of a reference system can be detected, but its velocity
cannot be detected absolutely. In Maxwell’s theory the
velocity of the electromagnetic waves appears in the
equations rather than their acceleration. Maxwell’s
equation and Galilean principle of relativity were
apparently in conflict. To reconcile the contradiction
between the principle of relativity and Maxwell’s
equation, Einstein supposed an absolute reference
system in the universe, which depended on his second
postulate of special relativity: There is a speed limit.
According to Newtonian mechanics a charged particle
(charge q, mass m) in a constant electric field E can be
accelerated to an arbitrary velocity: v(t)=qEt/m. The
velocity could be arbitrarily big according to the
equation. But, the Einstein’s special relativity supposes
that particles cannot be accelerated beyond the light
speed c=3×108 m/s (Kogut, 2001). As the Figure 1
shows, according to Newton’s law, the relative velocity
of the light to the observer should be v’=c+v, but the
relativity denies the rule called addition of velocities in
Newton’s world and gives the result as v’<c+v or v’=c,
with the speed limit postulate. It rests on Newton’s ideas
of absolute time and space. As my opinion, the speed
limit is the postulated idea by the theory of special
relativity and it is an idealistic concept.
c v’=c v
a
Light
Observer
Figure 1. A light moves to the left direction with the
speed c and an observer moves to the right direction
with the speed v. According to the Einstein’s special
relativity, the speed of the light observed by the
observer is also c, rather than c+v.
5. General Relativity
In the second half of 1915, Einstein expanded on his
general theory of relativity and most definitely included
"time" as a very important factor. According to the
general relativity, the laws of physics are the same in all
reference systems, and constant acceleration is
2 editor@sciencepub.net
 Nature and Science, 1(1), 2003, Ma, Nature of Time and Space
completely equivalent to a uniform gravitation
(gravitational mass=inertial mass). One of Einstein’s
postulates of this theory states that the fabric of space-
time, in the vicinity of a large mass, is curved. This
"curvature" can be observed affecting the motion of
other bodies in the vicinity in a way that is manifested
as a force. This is called the force of gravity. Another
tenet of Einstein's relativity notes the slowing of "time"
at high speeds. According to the theory of relativity,
some space-time future and past are relative to every
space-time point P (Figure 2) (Zeh, 1992).
Relative Future
P (Present)
Relative Past
Figure 2. Local space-time structure according to the
theory of relativity. Space-time future and past are
defined relatively to every event P and independently of
any frame of reference.
Although the general relativity has been universally
accepted by modern science, many questions still need
asked. Is acceleration relative? If there is no absolute
space in the universe, what is the reference of the
acceleration motion? We can say that there is no way to
determine which of two inertial reference systems is
really at rest and which is absolute motion, but we really
feel the absolute acceleration if the system is
accelerated. Accelerated to what? It does not need
reference to determine acceleration and the acceleration
is absolute. Be absolute to what? As my conclusion the
answer should be “space”. The space is the absolute
reference in the existed world. The space is absolute.
6. Quantum Mechanics
The submicroscopic atomic world of the quantum
mechanics and the vast cosmic world of the general
relativity provide a radically different conception of
time each, and physicists simply don't know how to
reconcile the two views. Specifically, DeWitt hijacked
the Schrödinger equation, named for the great Austrian
physicist who created it. In its original form, the
equation reveals how the arrangement of electrons
determines the geometrical shapes of atoms and
molecules. As modified by DeWitt, the equation
describes different possible shapes for the entire
universe and the position of everything in it. The key
difference between Schrödinger's quantum and DeWitt's
cosmic version of the equation - besides the scale of the
http://www.sciencepub.net
things involved - is that atoms, over time, can interact
with other atoms and change their energies. But the
universe has nothing to interact with except itself and
has only a fixed total energy. Because the energy of the
universe does not change with time, the easiest way to
solve what has become known as the Wheeler-DeWitt
equation is to eliminate time. In theories of quantum
mechanics, time is essentially taken for granted, and it
simply regularly ticks away in the background, just as it
does in our own lives. Time in the quantum theory has
no remarkable properties at all. That is not agreed in the
general relativity. The pictures of time in the general
relativity and the quantum mechanics are fundamentally
incompatible (Peskin, 1995).
7. Simultaneous Events
According to Einstein’s special theory of relativity, the
time clock varies and the simultaneity is relative from
the different observers. There is no universal way to say
if two specific physical events are simultaneous or not.
(Kirkpatrick, 1995). With Figure 3, the following gives
the description. For the two events X and Y, observer A
can say that they are the simultaneous events, observer
B can say that X is after Y, and observer C can say that
X is before Y (Figure 3). What is true? My answer is
that there is no answer. The real thing is that the events
X and Y are existed events. The differences of time
order gotten from different observers are their
description on an observed world, not an existed itself.
All the history is there forever, and all the future is there
already. There is neither before nor after in the nature.
Observer B v
a a
Event X Event Y
Observer A
v’ Observer C
Figure 3. There is no universal way to say if two
specific physical events are simultaneous or not
according to the special theory of relativity. As for the
events X and Y, if it is simultaneous for observer A, the
event Y will happen before the event X for observer B
and after the event X for observer C.
8. Time Dilation
3 editor@sciencepub.net
 Nature and Science, 1(1), 2003, Ma, Nature of Time and Space

According to the special theory of relativity, time Table 1. The Values of the Adjustment Factor for
interval increases with the object’s moving speed Various Speeds
(Figure 4). Speeds Adjustment Factor (γ)
Fastest subsonic jet plane 1.0000000000006
Mirror B
3 times speed of sound 1.000000000005
50% of speed of light 1.15
Light Light 80% of speed of light 1.67
c l0 c 99% of speed of light 7.09
99.99% of speed of light 70.7
99.9999% of speed of light 707
Mirror A v Mirror A
The speed of light ∞
v∆t
9. Lorentz Contraction
If the constancy of the speed limit implies time dilation,
Figure 4. The demonstration of the time dilation. In a it must also affect the measurements of the length of
moving box at the velocity v of right direction, a light moving objects. This is the Lorentz contraction (Kogut,
ray emits from mirror A and travels to mirror B (length 2001). It can be described with Figure 5.
AB) then reflects back to mirror A (length BA). l

As Figure 4 shows, the light ray travels along the line 1

segment AB and then along BA back to mirror A. The
distance mirror A in Figure 4 travels between sending
and receiving the light ray is v∆t. The distance the light A B
2
ray travels is: AB+BA=2 l 0 + (v∆t / 2) .
2
(1) v∆t1 2
The light ray also travels at the speed limit c in the box
according to special relativity postulate 2, so A B
AB+BA= c∆t (2)
Here the equation (2) is subjectively assumed that the v∆t2 3
light speed is limited to c as the special relativity
supposes.
Combining equations (1) and (2) it gets: A B
2
c∆t=2 l 0 + (v∆t / 2) .
2
Figure 5. The demonstration of the Lorentz contraction.
In a moving box at the velocity v of right direction, a
2l 0 2l 0 / c light ray emits from mirror A and travels to mirror B
∆t= =
c −v
2 2
1− v2 / c2 (length AB) then reflects back to mirror A (length BA).
∆τ In the first image of Figure 5, light ray leaves mirror A
∆t= ,
and heads toward mirror B (from left to right). In the
1− v / c 2 2
second image, the light ray reaches mirror B after a time
where ∆τ = 2l 0 / c =∆t 1 − v / c .
2 2 ∆t1. Mirror A has moved a distance v∆t1 to the right, so
c∆t1=l+∆t1. (3)
This result is called “time dilation”. The time interval
In the third image of Figure 5, the light ray leaves
in a moving system, ∆t is dilated by a factor of
mirror B and is reflected to mirror A. Between images 2
1 and 3, a time ∆t2 has passed, so mirror A moves an
γ ≡ .
1− v2 / c2 additional distance v∆t2:
Two experiments, one in 1971 and the other one in c∆t2=l-v∆t2. (4)
1977, confirmed the predictions of the time dilation Where the minus occurs because the light ray is
(Kirkpatrick, 1995). Time dilation is an observed moving from mirror B to A while mirror A is moving to
phenomenon. the right direction for the v∆t2.
Table 1 gives the calculated values of the adjustment ∆t=∆t1+∆t2
factor for the different speeds of the moving systems. l l
∆t = + (5)
c−v c+v

http://www.sciencepub.net 4 editor@sciencepub.net
 Nature and Science, 1(1), 2003, Ma, Nature of Time and Space
2l c
∆t = . modern science. Although there is no direct evidence of
1− v2 c2
From ∆t=γ(2l0/c), it gets
l = l 0 γ = 1 − v 2 c 2 l 0 . (6)
This is called Lorentz contraction because l is less than
l0. This result is conducted from the time dilation. It is
the observed result.
10. Gravity and Light
According to the special relativity, gravitation alters
space. One of the arguments of this is that space is
distorted when a gravitational field bends light.
Relativity denies the Newtonian space view of the flat-
space (Euclidean) and takes the warped space-time
view. According to Einstein’s general theory of
relativity a gravitational field alters time, and the
gravitational time dilation is caused (Pickover, 1998).
But, according to my opinion, the fact is that the clocks
run slower in a gravitational field, rather than the time
elapse slower. Light is bent by gravity (Figure 6). The
light is wave-particle, so that it is possible for light to
move as a curve, rather than straight line only, just like
any other object to travel in the three-dimension space
with any contrail. This is not space bent, but the light
bent. There is no gravitational time dilation existed.
Real star ∗ ∗ Apparent star position
position
Sun
Earth
Figure 6. The path of starlight is bent as it passes the
sun. This effect has been greatly exaggerated in this
drawing.
11. Gravitational Waves
When Einstein proposed his general theory of relativity,
he also postulated the existence of gravitational waves.
In many ways gravitational waves should be analogous
to electromagnetic waves. The acceleration of electric
charges produces electromagnetic waves such as light,
radio, radar, TV, and x-rays, etc. Gravitational waves
should result from the acceleration of mass. Both carry
energy through space, and decrease in intensity as the
inverse square of the distance from the source. But, the
gravitational waves have not been detected yet. Why?
First, the gravitational force is 1043 times weaker than
the electromagnetic force. Second, the detectors are less
sensitive in intercepting gravitational waves by at least
another factor of 1043. The detection of gravitational
http://www.sciencepub.net
waves is one of the most fundamental challenges of the
gravitational waves detected, there is strong indirect
evidence for the existence of the gravitational waves. In
1974 Joseph Taylor and Russell Hulse discovered a pair
of neutron stars orbiting each other at very close range.
Neutron stars normally have masses slightly larger than
the mass of our sun but they are only 10 km in diameter.
The electrons and protons in neutron stars combine and
form neutrons under the condition of high density, and
the neutron stars consist almost entirely of neutrons.
The two neutron stars Taylor and Hulse observed orbit
each other every eight hours and the orbital speed is
0.13% of the light speed. One of the neutron stars is a
pulsar that gives a pulse of radiation every 59
milliseconds. These pulses of radiation like a clock that
is as good as any atomic clock. This clock allows very
precise timings of the orbits and almost 20 years of
measurements indicate that the orbital period is
decreasing. In fact, it is decreasing at precisely the rate
expected from the loss of energy due to gravitational
radiation, possibly the gravitational wave. The 1993
Nobel Prize of physics was awarded to Taylor and
Hulse for this contribution (Kirkpatrick, 1995).
As a personal opinion, I think that the gravitational
waves will be detected directly, and it is only a matter of
the development of technology and the improvement of
the detecting sensitivity. As it has no evidence to say
that the speed of gravitational waves travel with the
light speed limitation, the detection of gravitational
waves will affect the concepts of the relativity and the
nature of time and space.
12. Big Bang
According to the modern cosmological principle, the
universe was formed about 15 billion years ago. For the
beginning, a tremendous explosion started the
expansion of the universe. This explosion is known as
the big bang model. At the point of this event all of the
matter, energy, time and space were contained at one
point. Supposing that there was neither time nor space
before the big bang. This occurrence was not a
conventional explosion but an event filling all of the
space with all of the particles of the embryonic universe
rushing away from each other. This phenomenon of
galaxies moving farther away from each other is known
as the redshift. Redshift says that the light ray will shift
to a longer wavelength (red direction) if the light source
moves from the observer. The faster the moving, the
more the redshift. Light from the farther galaxies has a
bigger redshift, which shows that the farther the stars,
the fast they are moving. The origin of the big bang
theory can be credited to Edwin Hubble. With the
redshift observation, Hubble made the conclusion that
the universe is continuously expanding. He discovered
that a galaxy’s velocity is proportional to its distance
5 editor@sciencepub.net
 Nature and Science, 1(1), 2003, Ma, Nature of Time and Space
from the observer. Galaxies that are twice as far from us
move twice as fast. Another consequence is that the
universe is expanding in every direction. This
observation means that it has taken every galaxy the
same amount of time to move from a common starting
position to its current position. Just as the big bang
theory provided for the foundation of the universe,
Hubble’s observations provided for the foundation of
the big bang theory.
Since the big bang, the universe has been continuously
expanding and there has been more and more distance
between clusters of galaxies. The big bang theory
received its strongest confirmation when Arno Penzias
and Robert Wilson, who later won the Nobel Prize in
1978 for the discovery of the cosmic background
radiation in 1964 (Lidsey, 2000).
The temperature of the universe at any given time is
directly related to the size and age of the universe. It
often proves convenient to measure the age of the
universe directly in terms of its temperature. A higher
temperature corresponds to an earlier time. When the
universe was one second old its temperature was about
ten billion degree. Matter in the form of atoms would
not have been present that time (Lidsey, 2000;
Delsemme, 1998). Even most modern cosmologists
agree that the big bang model represents an accurate
description of the very early universe, at least for the
time after about one second, what existed prior to the
big bang is completely unknown. Especially, it is
unreasonable to believe that there was neither time nor
space before the big bang (origin of the universe).
13. Black Hole
According to the general relativity, a black hole is a
region of space that has so much mass concentrated in it
that there is no way for a nearby object to escape its
gravitational pull. Light inside the black hole is bent
back on itself and never escapes. Stars begin to collapse
and the matter density would gradually increase within
the black hole. In the general relativity, gravity is a
manifestation of the curvature of space-time. Massive
objects distort time and space, so that the usual rules of
geometry do not apply anymore. This distortion of
space is extremely severe near a black hole. In
particular, a black hole has something called an event
horizon. This is a spherical surface that marks the
boundary of the black hole. Objects can pass in through
the horizon, but they cannot get back out. In fact, once
anything crosses the horizon, it will be doomed to move
inexorably closer and closer to the center of the black
hole (Al-Khalili, 2003).
The black hole theory does not show what will happen
for the gravitational waves from a black hole. Even the
postulate of relativity that makes light speed as the
speed limitation keeps matter escaping from the black
http://www.sciencepub.net
hole, whether the speed of gravitational waves obeys
this limitation is not clear.
14. Twin Paradox
As I have described in this article, time could be relative
and dilative according to relativity from the
epistemological point. But, from the ontological angle,
time could be neither relative nor dilative. People in
different inertial systems can stop their experiments,
come together, and compare clocks. They should be
able to resolve the question of which clock is really
running slower. This makes the apparent paradox, called
the twin paradox. Suppose that twins decide to do a
time-dilation experiment. One twin gets in a spaceship
and flies away from the earth. The spaceship travels out
to a distant star and returns to the earth. The twin
staying on the earth observes that clocks in the
spaceship run slower than on the earth. Therefore, the
twin in the spaceship ages more slowly. The twin should
return from the journey at a younger age than the one
who stays at home. Meanwhile, the twin in the
spaceship observes that the clocks on the earth are
running slower, as he will see that earth moves from
him (relatively). So, the earth-bound twin will age
slower and should be the younger age the reunion. Thus,
we have a paradox. How can each twin be younger than
the other? The answer by the physics now is that the
twin in the spaceship is taking the trip and his clock is
slower. This is supposed that the situation is not
symmetric and the spaceship accelerates to leave or
turns around to return. But, if there is no absolute space,
it will be no way to define which system is accelerated.
The two objects should be relative to be accelerated if
no absolute space existed. The fact is that we really feel
the accelerate force if we take the trip. So that, the only
possible answer is that the absolute reference should be
the absolute space. The theory of relativity is wrong in
this point.
15. Length Paradox
Suppose that an experimenter takes a pole of 9 m long
at 80% of the speed of light relatively to a box of 6 m
long. Knowing about the length contraction according to
the Lorentz contraction by special relativity, the
experimenter proposes that the pole can certainly fit the
box when it pass through the box for a while, as the
following calculation:
For the pole, original length l0=9 m, v=0.8 c. For the
pole’s length l when it moves at v, according to Lorentz
contraction [equation (6)]:
l = l0 γ = 1 − v 2 c 2 l0 =
9 × 1 − (0.8c) 2 c 2 = 9 × 1 − 0.64 = 5.4 (m).
As 5.4<6, the pole certainly can fit the box when the
pole passes through the box for a while.
6 editor@sciencepub.net
 Nature and Science, 1(1), 2003, Ma, Nature of Time and Space
For the box, it also moves at the speed of 0.8 c toward
the pole (relative moving). According to the Lorentz
contraction either, it is impossible for the box to fit the
pole at any instant as the box is too small to the pole, as
the following calculation:
For the box, original length l0’=6 m, v’=0.8 c. For the
box’s length l’ when it moves at v’:
l ' = l 0 ' γ = 1 − v' 2 c 2 l 0 ' =
6 × 1 − (0.8c) 2 c 2 = 6 × 1 − 0.64 = 3.6 (m).
As 3.6<6, the box certainly cannot fit the pole when
the box passes through the pole.
For the same event, it is impossible for the pole to fit
the box but for the box cannot fit the pole. So that we
can get the conclusion that the length cannot contract
from the ontological angle and the Lorentz contraction
by special relativity is wrong at this point. From
ontological point, the length (space) as an objective
existence has the absolute meaning and the Lorentz
contraction is at the epistemological level.
16. Probability Paradox (Oppugn the Second Law of
Thermodynamics)
The first law of thermodynamics is stated as “the energy
of the universe is fixed”, or “the energy is a function of
state”, i.e., there is no net energy change in any cyclic
process: dE=0. The second law of thermodynamics
could be formulated in four different ways: (1) Heat
cannot flow from a colder body to a hotter one
automatically; (2) Entropy must increase; (3) No cyclic
process can convert heat entirely to work; (4) In any
cyclic process the heat Q transferred to the system from
its surroundings at the temperature T must obey an
inequality: dQ/T<0 (Hoover, 1999).
The second law of thermodynamics is a statistical
result (Savitt, 1990; Uffink, 2001). As an example: take
ten billion red liquid particles and ten billion white
liquid particles, and arbitrarily mix all the particles in a
container. Suppose that there is no interaction between
any two of the particles. After a certain time, there is
almost no possibility that all the red particles are in a
half of the box and all the white particles are in the other
half part of the box. It cannot separate the red and white
particles without outside energy input. This suppose is
depended on all the red particles are same and all the
white particles are same, but the red ones and white
ones are different. This distinguishability comes from
the human eye as we see some particles are red and
others are white. The true story is that all the particles
are really different. There are twenty billion particles
that can be numbered from one to twenty billion. The
concept of entropy is an epistemological concept rather
than ontological concept. The basic ground for the
thermodynamics is to consume that the matter particles
are divided into groups with human’s idea, but not the
http://www.sciencepub.net
nature itself. According to thermodynamics, the
particles belonging to the same group are the same, and
those belonging to different category are different. But,
the true fact for the nature is that all the particles are
different. Any two particles in the universe are different.
Even one particle is not the same ones when it is at any
two different times. There is no reason to say that the
difference between any of two same color particles is
smaller than the difference between any of two particles
with different color. We say that red particle A is more
similar to red particle B than white particle A, and this
is depended on the human’s intuition. It is certainly
possible that red particle A is less similar to red particle
B than white particle A. The key point is that we must
know that any true existent distribution of the twenty
billion particles has the same possibility to appear as the
distribution of all red ones are in one half of the
container and the all white ones are in the other half of
the container.
As a metaphor, let’s think about this dilemma: A 20-
year-old guy is charged with killing another guy with a
knife by cutting the victim’s neck publicly. Many
people really saw this event and went to court as
witnesses. But, the attorney of the killer says in the
court: “The cut location was on the 16.5555555555 cm
from the top of the victim’s head with the 1.3333333333
cm deep and 3.3333333333 cm wide. According to the
statistical calculation, it needs about 1020 times to make
one time cut of this. If my client made the cut one time
per second, it needs at least 20 million years to get this
cut done (60×60×24×1000000=8.64×1010). My client is
only 20 years old. How could my client do this within
his 20 years even if he cut with all his time? This
against the second law of thermodynamics and the
principle of statistics.” Even plenty evidence and
witnesses are there to prove this killing, how is the
judger going to make the judgment if he respects the
statistical theory and the second law of thermodynamics
and the science?
The fact is that the basic statistical principles and the
second law of thermodynamics are useful tools in
human practice, but they are not the true natural
existence.
17. Uncertainty Principle
The famous Heisenberg's uncertainty principle states:
The more precisely the position (of a subatomic
particle) is determined, the less precisely the momentum
is known in this instant, and vice versa. According to
this argument by the German physicist Werner
Heisenberg, we cannot make any measurements on a
system of atomic entities without affecting the system.
The more precise our measurements, the more we
disturb the system. Furthermore, the measured and
disturbed quantities come in pairs, the more precisely
we determine one half of the pair, and the more we
7 editor@sciencepub.net
 Nature and Science, 1(1), 2003, Ma, Nature of Time and Space
disturb the other. In other words, the more certain we
are about the value of one, the more uncertain we are
about the value of the other. This is the essence of the
uncertainty principle. Mathematically, it says that the
product of the uncertainties of these pairs has a lower
limit equal to Planck’s constant. For example, the pair
of variables that is connected by the uncertainty
principle is energy and time: ∆E∆t>h (E is energy, t is
time and h is Planck’s constant) (Kirkpatrick, 1995).
From the description we can see that the uncertainty
principle is a mathematical results even with observed
supports.
The uncertainty principle is a measurable principle, not
an existent principle. It is the epistemological principle
rather than the ontological principle. Not to say if it is
right or wrong, this uncertainty principle is depended on
the ability of human brain and muscle to determine the
position and momentum of an object. But, it does not
say anything if the position and momentum certainty
existing in the same time or not. Even the measurement
is principle important for technology and maybe also for
science, the real essence of the world is its existence,
rather than its measurability. The existence is 0 and 1.
This means that all in the natural world only have two
conditions: existence and non-existence. It is not the
natural fact that a physical object can exist in the
probability x: 0<x<1. It must be: x=0 or x=1. The
uncertainty principle does not show the real world.
18. Three-dimensional Time
Suppose that a signal travels in the three-dimensional
space with velocity v at any direction that represented
by the variable distance s. The distance s to reach any
particular point in the three-dimensional space will be
the summation of x, y, and z:
S2=x2+y2+z2 (7)
vt=s (8)
Substituting the above:
v2t2= x2+y2+z2
t2=( x2+y2+z2)/v2
t2=(x2/v2)+(y2/v2)+(z2/v2)
t2x= x2/v2
t2 y= y2/v2
t2 z=z2/v2
t2= t2x+t2y+t2z (9)
From equation (9) we can see that the time of a signal
to travel in the three-dimensional space is three
dimensions either. The nature of time could be three
dimensions according to the above mathematical
calculation. This three-dimensional time concept is
obtained from the mathematical calculation rather than
the ontological existence. Mathematical results are at
the epistemological level. If any mathematical result is
in conflict with the possible existence, I persist that the
possible existence is true.
http://www.sciencepub.net
19. The Measurement of Time
The modern idea of time is the fourth dimension of the
space. We measure the length, width and depth of an
object in order to define its place in space, and we now
recognize the importance of its fixed position at the time
of the measurement.
Three systems of time measurements are in use: (1)
universal time (Greenwich Mean Time) – derived from
the rotation of the earth on its axis; (2) ephemeris time –
derived from the revolution of the earth around the sun;
(3) atomic time – derived from the operation of the
atomic clocks. Universal time is the mean solar time of
the prime meridian on which the city of Greenwich of
England is located. The universal time is the basis for
the standard time used for the reckoning of civil time.
Ephemeris time is the time scale of dynamical
astronomy that is used for the precise study of the
motion of celestial bodies. Atomic time is the time
measurements of the time interval related to the physical
phenomena. The time measurement tools are normally
called clocks.
There are many kinds of clocks in the human history,
such as water clock, sand clock, glass clock, pendulum
clock, quartz-crystal clock, atomic clock, etc. The
typical method to measure time is the pendulum. A
given pendulum completes a certain fixed number of
oscillations while the earth rotates once on its axis
relative to the stars. A simple pendulum whose length is
one meter, for example, always completes 43,047
oscillations while the earth rotates once on its axis
(Markowitz, 1988).
The most discussions on time measurement by the
relativity are clock. The clock is a man-made tool to
measure the time. This is an epistemological concept.
20. Absolute Time and Space
Both the relativity and quantum mechanics are thinking
about how to measure the time with a clock and how to
measure the space with a ruler. They are at the
epistemological (or empiricism) level. To reveal the
essence of nature, we need to discuss the time and space
from the ontology, or naturalism point. From the
ontology angle, the key point is not about how to make
the accurate measurements, but how to understand the
real nature existence.
If there is no absolute space existing, all the
movements including the accelerative movement are
relative. But, we really feel the accelerative movements
if we take an accelerative carriage and we do not need
any moving or static reference to feel this acceleration.
How can we feel the acceleration as our experience if
there is no absolute reference system to be referenced?
Considering the earth or a big star as the reference
system is really objective. The light pathway can be
curved, but it is the light’s pathway is curved, rather
than the space is curved. There is no reason to say that
8 editor@sciencepub.net
 Nature and Science, 1(1), 2003, Ma, Nature of Time and Space
the light ray must travel on a specific surface of a space.
We can assume that the phenomenon of light ray curved
is the light passes through the continuous surfaces of
absolute space when the gravitational force influences
the light, rather than the space is curved by the
gravitation (Figure 6). Even we agree with the concepts
of time dilation and Lorentz contraction, we still should
consider them as a linguistic question, rather than the
scientific tenet. For the body in an inertial system, the
moving is relative. If we do not give a reference, we
cannot verify its motion. But, for the accelerated
motion, it does not need to define a reference. How do
we know the absolute acceleration without an absolute
reference? The only possibility is that there is an
absolute reference – the absolute space. The size of
space can be measured small under a specific physical
condition such as an moving object, but the space itself
cannot be changed by human observation. The real
space is absolute!
Time is a strange being. It is everywhere and is always
running. In all literatures, sciences and mythologies
time always goes in one direction-forward. According to
the relativity time can be zero or stand still at the speed
of light. But time never vanishes. It is the current belief
that time can be removed and introduced into the
universe thereby showing that total universal time is
constant. This is a weird concept. People can see the
time arrow goes in one direction in the macro-world, but
never see it goes vice versa. In the micro-world,
according to the quantum calculation, scientists get the
two-way time arrow objectively. Why? The reason is
that the intelligence of human brain cannot feel the true
existence of the micro-world running. This is the
science tricking brain. The clocks can run slower under
a specific physical condition such as an object moving,
but the time cannot elapse slower by human’s
measurements. Time is the natural existence
phenomenon. Nobody can make the time dilate or
shrink by his/her measuring activity. The real time is
absolute!
21. Timeless World
I have discussed the nature of time and space partly
from the epistemological angle depended on the
common scientific notions. Now, let’s think about the
timeless world concept from the ontological angle.
For the past, where is it now? For the future, where
does it stay? These questions have been asked in the
whole history of human society (Hawking, 1988, 2002).
I am convinced of the timeless world naturally. In my
view, everything in the universe will never change.
Time and motion are nothing more than illusions. In the
universe, every moment of every individual's life - birth,
death, and anything in between - exists forever.
Everyone is eternal. That means each and every one of
us is immortal. The universe has neither past nor future.
http://www.sciencepub.net
All the things in the past, present, and future exist
forever. The concepts of past, present and future are
depended on the human brain. The total universal time
is constant. It is a matter of experimentally proven fact
that this seemingly universal flow of time does not exist.
Lapses of time, as they are measured by the recurrence
of periodic events, are not impervious to everything but
rather depend upon the relative motion of the two
systems whose periodicities are being compared and the
positions of the systems are in a gravitational field.
A ship with over-light speed can catch the image of the
past events. This happens only because the light goes
out but not because there is the real past time. This is
just like what we see a movie tape with the reversed
direction. The fact is that everything exists already and
forever. We see that there are past and future because
we are living in our time arrow. This is the absolute
time. The key question for us is how to testify that the
past still exists and the future has existed already.
22. Determinism
Classic Newtonian mechanics and the newer quantum
mechanics have been sources of many debates about the
role of cause and effect in the natural world. With
Newton’s law of motion came the idea that specifying
the position and momentum of a particle and the forces
acting on it allowed the calculation of its future motion
(Roberts, 2003). Everything is determined. It was like
that the universe is an enormous machine. Since the
universe has been made of existence condition, its
future is predetermined. This idea is known as the
Newton’s mechanical determinism. This notion must
also be extended to living organisms. Newton’s
mechanical determinism has been criticized by the
relativity and the quantum theories.
Even though humans could not determine the positions
and momenta of all the objects at a specific time,
according to the Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, and
there are limitations of the abilities for the human
intelligence to know the future of the world, the nature
knows the future. The future is predetermined by nature.
All things in the future are real existence in the future
according to the timeless world tenet, no matter we can
pre-know or not. For natural existence fact, we must say
that the “determinism (predetermine)” is true, not the
“prophetism (precognition)” is true. Everything of the
world in future is there – somewhere in future, no
matter whether we do know the detail or not.
Time, space, memory and mind are related. To talk
about this I want to mention the old Zen parable of the
three Buddhist monks who were arguing about a waving
flag. The first monk said that the flag was moving, not
the wind. The second monk said that the wind was
moving, not the flag. Then the third monk smiled and
said: "It is neither the wind nor the flag that is moving -
it is your minds". This provided a hint for the nature of
9 editor@sciencepub.net
 Nature and Science, 1(1), 2003, Ma, Nature of Time and Space
our knowledge. The principles and theories we created,
such as the relativity, the uncertainty principle, the
second law of thermodynamics and the probability
theory, etc., all are the moving of our mind. Maybe we
will never know the complete functions and future of
the universe with our limited ability. But the nature does
know. The natural determinism is the natural existence
that is not depended on our knowledge or our abilities.
23. Discussions and Conclusions
A lot of discussions on the topics of nature of time and
space have been made and the relativity and the
quantum theories were challenged (Butterfield, 2003;
Hawking, 2001; Hoover, 2003; Morriston, 1999;
Myrvold, 2003).
Motion is everywhere in the universe. In one second, a
human heartbeat takes place and the earth moves about
30 km around the sun, and a beam of light travels
300,000 km (7 times around our earth). In addition, the
earth rotates on its axis at almost 1,600 km and revolves
around the sun at approx 100,000 km per hour. This
entire solar system is moving toward the star Vega at
about 19 km per second and our Milky Way galaxy is
traveling toward the Great Andromeda galaxy at about
80 km per second.
Space is defined by saying where a thing may come to
be or has been. It is the separator of objects. Time is a
similar separator of chronological events (when things
have been or may come to be). The whole universe is an
entity connected by the space-time field. The whole
universe is one thing.
There are two aspects for the concept of time and
space: One is the measured time and space (subjective,
epistemology), and the other is the physical time and
space (objective, ontology, physical entity). As the
space expands, it is no reason to say that the space
expands or the ruler shrinks, neither to say that time
dilates or contracts. The only accepted natural fact is
that we get the message of something sometimes getting
bigger (so called expanding or dilating) and sometimes
becoming smaller (so called shrinking or contacting).
To describe the universe on the largest scale, Einstein
weaved time and space together into the very fabric of
the universe. As a result in the general relativity, there is
no invisible framework, no clock ticking outside the
universe against which to measure events. How could
there be? Time and space joined together cause weird
consequences: Space and time curve around stars and
other massive bodies and make light bend away from
straight-line paths. Does time seem to slow down or
even come to a full stop near the black holes? The
concepts on these topics by modern science are at the
idealist point.
The mistakes of the relativity are to consider that all
the existence is relative but the light/light speed is
absolute. Light is only a form of electromagnetic
http://www.sciencepub.net
radiation existing in the universe with the wave and
particle properties. From this point, as any other forms
of the existence, light cannot be the standard to judge
the nature of time and space. All the existences in the
universe are existing, including all the energy, matter,
moving, space, time, etc. The existence is absolute, no
matter someone observing/measuring it or not. After
Albert Einstein died on April 18, 1955, the universe still
exists absolutely. The existence is not depended on
whether Heisenberg could measure it precisely or not.
We have no way to ontologically recognize all the
past, present, or future existence. The contemporary
intelligent people could monitor the instantaneous state
of the processing of inputs by the brain. However, what
perceived has been delayed in the perceiving process
because in the course of this perceiving procedure, a
finite amount of time is taken to encode and process the
inputs. The processed information is transferred to a
tape called memory, which is often modified in the
process of accessing. From epistemology, we consider
that the future is modifiable by intervention in real time,
while the past is not. The human brain, by a process of
participation, transforms visual inputs in the form of
light waves into the objective reality. We see the world
through our eyes and we think about the world with our
brain cells (Brown, 1998). Light rays are the bridge
from the body to the spirit through the tunnel of the
mind. Furthermore, we can also feel the real world and
measure the world with our skin, nose, tongue, hand,
etc. All the physical parts of our body can be used to
feel and measure the world. So, making the light as the
absolute reference is totally wrong. We trust our
observations but we know that the world we observe is
the observed world, and sometimes it is not the real
existed world. Even we must depend on our
observations, but we should think about what it really is
(Rose, 1998).
According to the big bang theory, time began with the
big bang, an explosion of a singularity (Earman, 1999).
The theory is very vague on the how, when, where, and
why of that singularity. Was it located in space? If so,
space has no beginning and space must be absolute.
Some scientists consider the big bang to be a rapid
expansion of space. If space can expand, then it is in
motion, and thus it cannot be a dimension that defines
motion. If we say the beginning of the universe, we
need to ask “beginning of what?” According to the
modern cosmology, the concept of time has no meaning
before the beginning of the universe. It did not exist
then. So that we can see that the modern cosmological
concept on the time and space is wrong. Linear time is
based on a historical perspective of events that rush
ahead, one following the other, in a straight line. The
passage of light is an event. Events occur in time and
space. Time and space measure the when and where of
10 editor@sciencepub.net
 Nature and Science, 1(1), 2003, Ma, Nature of Time and Space
events. Light passes through space during a time span. It
is not the passage of light through space creates time.
Ontologically, the time and space can neither contract
nor expand. If we really want to say that time and space
can contract or expand, we must create other words to
define the concepts of those kinds of “time” and
“space”, rather than the time and space we have defined
already. The modern physics and cosmology, such as
the relativity and the quantum theory, are defining the
contraction/expansion of time/space with the linguistic
tricks, rather than the scientific philosophy.
Contemporary astrophysics says that it has significant
evidence revealing that the universe is open (expanding
only, not oscillating). When this conclusion is combined
with other types of cosmological observations, it would
seem that the universe originated at a singularity (an
absolute temporal boundary) approximately 15 billion
years ago. This intends to give conclusions about a
causative power outside of space-time asymmetry (i.e.,
a Creator), and the nature of space-time and causality
(Spitzer, 2001).
If we say that the universe is finite, we must ask and
answer what is the outside of the universe. Although
this is an ancient question, it is still the question that
nobody can answer reasonably. “Nothing” is not the
satisfied answer to the outside of the universe of the
finite model.
Although the quantum information theory that
combines physics, computer science and information
theory has succeeded in harnessing the special features
of the sub-atomic world to devise fast algorithms, to
decipher unbreakable codes, and to teleport quantum
states (Hagar, 2003), and this gives quantum theory new
features, the quantum theory still conflicts with the real
physical existence.
Correspondence to:
Hongbao Ma
B326 Clinical Center
Department of Medicine
Michigan State University
East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
Telephone: 517-432-0623 (O); 517-355-7880 (H)
Email: hongbao@msu.edu
References
Al-Khalili J. Black holes wormholes & time machines. Institute of
Physics Publishing, Bristol, United Kingdom. 2003:78-107.
Barbour J. The End of Time – The next revolution of physics.
Oxford University Press. New York City, New York. 2000:11-3.
Brown JW. Foundations of cognitive metaphysics. Process Studies
1998;27(1-2):79-92.
Butterfield J, Isham C. Spacetime and the philosophical challenge of
quantum gravity, in Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale:
Contemporary Theories, in Quantum Gravity, Callender C (ed),
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Britain. 2001:33-89.
http://www.sciencepub.net
Callender C. Philosophy of space-time physics, in The Blackwell
Guide to the Philosophy of Science, Machamer P (ed), Blackwell
Press, Cambridge, Britain. 2002:173-98.
Delsemme A. Our cosmic origin: From the big bang to the
emergence of life and intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
Cambridge, United Kingdom. 1998:28-37.
Dowe P. The coincidences of time travel. Philosophy of Science.
2003;70(3):574-89.
Earman J, Eisenstaedt J. Einstein and singularities. Studies in History
and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 1999;30B(2):185-235.
Folger T. From here to eternity- Imagine a universe with no past or
future, where time is an illusion and everyone is immortal. Discover
2000;21(12):54-61.
Hagar A. A Philosopher looks at quantum information theory.
Philosophy of Science 2003;70(4):752-75.
Hawking SW. A brief history of time: from the big bang to black
holes. Bantam Books, New York, NY, USA. 1988:16-25.
Hawking SW, Penrose R. The nature of space and time. Princeton
University Press. Princeton, NJ, USA. 1996:3-36.
Hawking SW, Penrose R. The nature of space and time.
International-Studies-in-Philosophy 2001;33(4):126-7.
Hawking SW, Thorne KS, Novikov I, Ferris T, Lightman A. The
future of spacetime. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York, NY,
USA. 2002:57-62.
Hoover KD. Nonstationary time series, cointegration, and the
principle of the common cause. The British Journal for the Philosophy
of Science 2003;54(4):527-51.
Hoover WG. Time reversibility, computer simulation, and chaos.
World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. River Edge, NJ, USA.
1999:41-2.
Hyperdictionary. http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/time.
2003.
Kirkpatrick LD, Wheeler GF. Physics. Saunders College Publishing.
New York, NY, USA. 1995:274-83.
Kogut JB. Introduction to relativity. Harcourt/Academic Press.
Burlington, MA, USA. 2001:12-20.
Lidsey JE. The big bang. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge,
United Kingdom. 2000:55-65.
Markowitz W. Time. In Collier’s Encyclopedia. Macmillan
Educational Company. New York, NY, USA. 1988;22:318-25.
Monk NAM. Conceptions of space-time: Problems and possible
solutions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.
1997;28B(1):1-34.
Morriston W. Must the past have a beginning? Philo1999;2(1):5-19.
Myrvold WC. Relativistic quantum becoming. The British Journal
for the Philosophy of Science 2003;54(3):475-500.
New Webster’s Dictionary, Weston, FL, USA. 2003:161,173.
Peskin ME, Schroeder DV. An introduction to quantum field theory.
Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. New York, NY, USA.
1995:781-800.
Pickover CA. Time: A traveler’s guide. Oxford University Press.
New York, NY, USA. 1998:25-33.
Roberts JT. Leibniz on force and absolute motion. Philosophy of
Science 2003;70(3):553-73.
Rose S. Lifelines. Oxford University Press. New York City, New
York. 1998:136-41.
Savitt SF. Epistemological time asymmetry. Proceedings of the
Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association
1990;317-24.
Spitzer RJ. Indications of creation in contemporary astrophysics.
Ultimate Reality and Meaning. 2001;24(3):209-54.
Uffink J. Bluff your way in the second law of thermodynamics.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2001;32B(3):
305-94.
Webster’s New Universal Unabridged Dictionary. Barnes & Noble
Publishing, Inc. New York, NY, USA. 2003:1827,1984.
Zeh HD. The physical basis of the direction of time. Springer-
Verlag. New York, NY, USA. 1992:8-11.
11 editor@sciencepub.net