Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/282238991
Article in Special Topics & Reviews in Porous Media An International Journal · January 2015
DOI: 10.1615/.2015012321
CITATIONS READS
5 169
4 authors, including:
Perry Li
University of Minnesota Twin Cities
281 PUBLICATIONS 4,307 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Chao Zhang on 20 February 2018.
Special Topics & Reviews in Porous Media — An International Journal, 6 (2): 145–158 (2015)
Chao Zhang,∗ Terrence W. Simon, Perry Y. Li, & James D. Van de Ven
∗
Address all correspondence to Chao Zhang E-mail: zhan1120@umn.edu
Interrupted-plate heat exchangers are used as regenerators for absorbing and releasing thermal energy such as in a
Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) system in which the exchanger absorbs energy to cool the air being compressed
or liberates energy to heat the air upon expansion. The exchanger consists of layers of thin plates in stacked arrays. In
a given layer, the plates are parallel to one another and parallel to the exchanger axis. Each successive layer is rotated to
have its plates be perpendicular to those of the layer below but still parallel to the exchanger axis. As flow passes from
one layer to the next, new thermal boundary layers develop, beneficial to effective heat transfer. The interrupted-plate
heat exchanger can also be seen as a porous medium. As such, it demonstrates strong anisotropic behavior when flow
approaches the plates in a direction other than axially. Thus, pressure drops and heat transfer coefficients are dependent
upon the attack angle. Mathematical models for anisotropic pressure drop and heat transfer behavior are proposed based
on numerical calculations on a Representative Elementary Volume (REV), the unit cell model of the interrupted-plate
medium. The anisotropic pressure drop is modeled by the traditionally used Darcy and inertial terms, with the addition
of another term representing mixing effects. Heat transfer between the fluid and the plates is formulated in terms of
Nusselt number vs. Reynolds number and approach angle of the mean flow. These models are used when solving, on the
scale of the heat exchanger application, the volume-averaged Navier–Stokes equations that treat the exchanger region as
a continuum. The analysis of the heat exchanger is used for design and optimization of the medium.
KEY WORDS: porous media, numerical simulation, heat exchanger, convection, anisotropic heat transfer,
interrupted plate
1. INTRODUCTION fore, as flow passes through the plate layers, new thermal
boundary layers are created, which is beneficial to heat
The present study presents modeling of three-dimensio- transfer. One application of such medium is Compressed
nal, anisotropic heat transfer and flow resistance prop- Air Energy Storage, where it is used in the chamber of
erties of an interrupted-plate medium that is made for a liquid-piston compressor to absorb heat from air being
the purpose of thermal regeneration. The design idea compressed (Zhang et al., 2013) and liberate that energy
of the present interrupted-plate heat exchanger (heat- when the air is being expanded. Due to its shape, the
absorbing porous medium) originated from a microfabri- interrupted-plate medium is an effective heat exchanger
cated segmented-involute-foil regenerator used for a Stir- but it represents a three-dimensional, highly anisotropic
ling engine (Tew et al., 2007; Sun et al., 2009). The struc- porous medium, requiring detailed characterization of its
ture features layers of thin plates that are stacked per- fluid mechanics properties. The present study resolves the
pendicularly to each other, as shown in Fig. 1. There- anisotropic pressure drop and heat transfer properties.
Draft
2151–4798/15/$35.00 °
c 2015 by Begell House, Inc. 145
146 Draft Zhang et al.
NOMENCLATURE
*
aV surface area per volume (/m) Sm momentum source term (Pa/m)
bf inertial coefficient (/m) T temperature (K)
bf 1 anisotropic inertial coefficient t thickness (m)
for x direction (/m) u velocity
bf 2 anisotropic inertial coefficient V volume
for y direction (/m)
bf 3 anisotropic inertial coefficient Greek Symbols
for z direction (/m) α angle between mean velocity
c conduction effect (–) vector and x axis (–)
cp Specific heat J/(KgK) β angle between mean velocity
d 1 , d 2 , f1 , f 2 coefficients for mixing vector and y axis (–)
on heat transfer (–) γ angle between mean velocity
b inertial coefficient (/m) vector and z axis (–)
¯b̄ anisotropic inertial matrix (/m) ² porosity (–)
b half distance between plates θ angle between mean velocity vector
H pressure resistance term due to mixing and xOy plain (–)
effects (–) κ turbulence kinetic energy
hV volumetric heat transfer coefficient (m2 /s2 )
W/(m3 K) ρ density (kg/m3 )
K permeability (m2 ) ϕ angle between the projection
k thermal conductivity [W/(mK)] of mean velocity
L representative pores size (m) vector on the xOy plane and x axis (–)
` plate length (m) χ a flow variable (velocity, temperature
m Reynolds number exponent characterizing or pressure) (m/s, K, or Pa)
anisotropic mixing on pressure drop (–)
Nu Nusselt number Subscript
n Reynolds number exponent characterizing REV representative elementary volume
anisotropic mixing on heat transfer
℘ periodic pore-scale pressure (Pa) Superscript
q 00 wall heat flux W/m2 f fluid region
ReL Reynolds number based on a s solid region
representative pore size * dimensionless variable
One method of modeling fluid flow and heat transfer packed beds (Saito and de Lemos, 2009), double-pipe
in engineering applications of porous media is by solving heat exchangers (Du et al., 2010), solar receivers (Xu
the volume-averaged transport equations. In the compu- et al., 2011), or metal-foam-filled liquid piston compres-
tational domain, the porous medium region is treated as sors (Zhang et al., 2013). In this approach, flow variables
a continuum (Slattery, 1969; Vafai and Tien, 1981). As are volume-averaged based on a Representative Elemen-
such, when applied to simulating flow in a porous zone, tary Volume (REV), which is a repeating, unit cell of the
closure models are used in the Navier–Stokes equations porous medium. It is defined as
to model the interactions between the flow and the in-
Z
ternal walls of the porous medium. Such approach has 1
been applied to metal-foam-filled pipes (Lu et al., 2006), hχi = χdV (1)
VREV VREV
Three Reynolds numbers are investigated in the simula- Angles αp , βp , and γp are varied in different simula-
tion runs: 1, 181, and 8309. These Reynolds numbers rep- tion runs. The pore-scale pressure gradient, (∂℘)/(∂xi ),
resent, respectively, Darcy, Darcy plus Forchheimer, and and the magnitude of the global-scale pressure drop
post-Forchheimer (turbulent) flow regimes. The Reynolds |(∂hpif )/(∂xi )| are calculated. Geometrical representa-
number is based on the mean flow velocity and a charac- tions of these angles are given in Fig. 2(a). Any direction
teristic pore size, in a 3D space can be defined by using either the (α, β, γ)
system, or a (ϕ, θ) system, as shown in Fig. 2(b).
*
ρ|h ui|L Periodic boundary conditions are applied on each pair
ReL = (4)
µ of the inlet and outlet boundaries of the REV domain,
where L is defined as 2L3 = VREV,f . Laminar flow Γ|x=−l = Γ|x=l , Γ|y=−(b+ 2t ) = Γ|y=b+ 2t ,
transport equations are solved when Reynolds number is Γ|z=−(b+ 2t ) = Γ|z=b+ 2t , Γ = ui , ℘
1 or 181; the RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes)
equations are solved when Reynolds number is 8309, On the interfacial boundary between the fluid and solid,
given in the following (with the overbars being omitted): the no-slip velocity and uniform-wall-heat-flux boundary
conditions are used. The periodic thermal boundary con-
∂ui dition is defined using interfacial wall heat flux,
=0 (5)
∂xi
· µ
∂ui ∂(ui uj ) ∂p ∂ ∂ui ∂uj
ρ +ρ =− + µ +
∂t ∂xj ∂xi ∂xj ∂xj ∂xi
¶¸ ³ ´
2 ∂uk ∂
− δij + −ρu0i u0j (6)
3 ∂xk ∂xj
∂ ³ ui ui ´ ∂ h ³ ui ui ´i
ρ cp T + +ρ uj cp T + +p
∂t 2 ∂xj 2
· µ ¶
∂ ∂T ∂ui ∂uj 2 ∂uk
= k + ui µ + − δij
∂xj ∂xj ∂xj ∂xi 3 ∂xk
¸
cp µt ∂T
+ (7)
Prt xj (a) α, β and γ
Solutions are obtained when the flow reaches a steady
state in the REV simulation. The Boussinesq hypothesis
is used to relate the Reynolds stresses to the mean velocity
gradients,
The model (the curve) and the CFD results (the points)
are compared in Fig. 5, which shows good agreement.
The dimensionless pressure drop decreases with increas-
ing Reynolds number, because of non-dimensionalization
with the inertial effects.
m23 * 2 ∗
ρH23 ReL cos β|h ui| hu3 i . In sum, the pressure drop
in the Oy direction is
µ ∗¶
∂p 1 L2 ∗
= − hu2 i −[Lb2 Lb23 cos β cos γ]
∂y ∗ yOz ReL K2
· ∗ ¸
hu2 i m23 ∗
FIG. 6: Velocity and wall temperature distributions × ∗ − H23 ReL cos βhu3 i (16)
hu 3 i
(ReL = 8309, θ = 45◦ , ϕ = 90◦ ).
Due to the identical periodic features of the shape along
the Oy and Oz directions, the pressure drop in the Oz
direction must be modeled as
µ ∗¶
∂p 1 L2 ∗ £ ¤
= − hu3 i − Lb23 cos β cos γ Lb2
∂z ∗ yOz ReL K2
· ∗ ¸
hu2 i ∗
× ∗ − H23 Rem L cosγhu2 i
23
(17)
hu3 i
(a)
µ ¶
∂p∗ 1 L2 ∗ £ ¤
=− hu2 i − Lb21 cos α cos β Lb2
∂y ∗ xOy ReL K2
· ∗ ¸
hu1 i ∗
× ∗ − H21 Rem
L
21
cos βhu1 i (19)
hu2 i
FIG. 9: Velocity and wall temperature distributions
(ReL = 8309, θ = 0, ϕ = 5.4◦ ). Results from 12 CFD runs with different mean flow an-
gles and two different Reynolds numbers are used to find
the inertial and mixing coefficients in the model.
Comparing Figs. 9 and 10 to Figs. 6 and 7, one sees
that if the mean flow is parallel to the yOz plane (Figs. 6 b12 = −63.12/m, b21 = 221.6/m, H12 = 0.6252,
and 7), the local fluid follows the Oy direction in some re-
gions of the REV while in other regions it follows the Oz H21 = 2.271, m12 = −0.04198, m21 = 0.02699
direction. However, if the mean flow is parallel to the xOy The model and the CFD runs are in good agreement as
plane (Figs. 9 and 10), it is not possible for the local fluid shown in Fig. 11. The maximum values for the directional
(a) (b)
FIG. 11: Pressure drops with different mean flow directions with different Reynolds numbers, all parallel to the xOy
plane (curves: model; points: CFD results); (a) x-directional pressure drop, (b) y-directional pressure drop.
components of the pressure drop, ∂p∗ /∂x∗ and ∂p∗ /∂y ∗ , neither ϕ nor θ is or 90◦ . The flow fields for such cases
are reached when the mean flow has an angle of attack are shown in Figs. 12 and 13. Even though the mean flow
with respect to the plates. is in a certain direction, the local flow features do not fol-
In the previous discussions, specially chosen CFD runs low this direction, and they run in very different directions
have resolved the pressure drop characteristics of the in- to reduce impingement on the walls, leading to complex
terrupted plate medium with respect to different flow an- flow separation and mixing pattern. This feature is bene-
gles and the directional pressure drop components are ficial for heat transfer, as the amount of mixing that leads
shown to be functions of directional velocity components. to heat transfer is determined by the pore-scale mixing
The full model is given by activities.
2 The model [Eq. (20)] and pressure drop values cal-
L culated from all the simulation cases are compared in
K1 0 0
∗ Fig. 14. The following features of the anisotropic pressure
1 hu1 i
∗ ∗ L2 ∗ drop of the interrupted-plate medium can be observed.
∇ p =− 0 0 hu 2 i
ReL K2 ∗ For a very small θ, as ϕ increases from 0 to 90◦ , (1)
hu i
L2 3
the x-directional pressure drop increases slightly when
0 0
K2 ◦
ϕ reaches around 30 , due to an increase in viscous ef-
Lb1 Lb12 cos α cos β Lb12 cos α cos γ fect in the x direction, and it then decreases to 0 as ϕ
− Lb21 cos α cos β Lb2 Lb23 cos β cos γ
Lb21 cos α cos γ Lb23 cos β cos γ Lb2
∗
hu1 i
∗
× hu2 i
∗
hu3 i
0 H12 RemL
12
cos α H12 Rem L
12
cos α
− H21 ReL 21 cos β
m
0 H23 ReL 23 cos β
m
m21 m23
H21 ReL cos γ H23 ReL cos γ 0
∗
hu1 i
∗
× hu2 i (20)
∗
hu3 i
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
(e) (f)
FIG. 14: Comparison of anisotropic pressure drop between model (curved surfaces) and CFD solutions (points).
Two locations are labeled with brackets to give comparisons between the CFD “x” (first entry in the bracket) and the
corresponding model results (second entry in the bracket). The locations being labeled are (ϕ = 55◦ , θ = 31◦ ) and
(ϕ = 75◦ , θ = 65◦ ) for ReL = 181; (ϕ = 44◦ , θ = 31◦ ) and (ϕ = 63◦ , θ = 42◦ ) for ReL = 8309. (a) x-direction
pressure drop, ReL = 181, (b) x-direction pressure drop, ReL = 8309, (c) y-direction pressure drop, ReL = 181,
(d) y-direction pressure drop, ReL = 8309, (e) z-direction pressure drop, ReL = 181, (f) z-direction pressure drop,
ReL = 8309.
represents convective heat transfer due to fluid inertial two-dimensional and quasi-three-dimensional porous me-
and mixing effects. Furthermore, this term is based only dia investigated. Given this, a more generalized form for
on the angle γ because it is the dominant angle for the this term is adopted in the present study by including
(a)
θ increases from 0 to around 40◦ and then decreases as θ flow and its projection on the xOy plane, and ϕ, the an-
continues to reach 90◦ . (3) Because of the aforementioned gle between the projected vector on the xOy plane and the
aspects, the highest heat transfer effects occur when the Ox axis. The directional pressure drop is largest when ei-
mean flow approaches in a direction with both ϕ and θ ther θ or ϕ is around 45◦ while the other is 0. The reason
being about 33◦ . The reason for this is that with this direc- for this is that the largest flow separation effect is real-
tion, the pore-scale fluid is most agitated, forming com- ized when the mean flow approaches from this direction.
plex fluid movement in many different directions inside If either θ or ϕ is smaller than 45◦ while the other is 0,
the REV, even though the mean flow is pointing in one the flow separation effect is smaller; if either θ or ϕ is
specific direction. This situation is illustrated by the flow greater than 45◦ while the other is 0, stagnation zones in
fields in Figs. 12 and 13. Heat transfer is enhanced by the the REV play important roles in suppressing fluid move-
agitated pore-scale fluid. ment and, thus, reducing pressure drop. If either θ or ϕ
The proposed models are further tested against a CFD is around 45◦ while the other is greater than 0, the pore-
simulation for a Reynolds number that was not used for scale fluid attempts to run parallel to the plate to avoid
developing the models. A flow through the REV in the x direct impingement on the plate, leading to reduced flow
direction with a Reynolds number of 4969 is simulated separation effects. Heat transfer is greatest when both θ
using the Transition SST model, and a mesh count of and ϕ are around 33◦ , again due to agitation on the pore
1,323,532 cells, with a maximum y+ value of 1.88 for scale. For a given Reynolds number, the largest heat trans-
the first layer of cells next to the wall. The Nu/Pr1/3 val- fer and the largest pressure drop do not occur for the same
ues and the dimensionless pressure drop values resulting mean flow angle of attack. This indicates that heat trans-
from the CFD simulation and the model are, respectively, fer can be maximized with reduced cost in flow resistance
166.9 and 167.1, and –0.1217 and –0.1078. The model is by carefully positioning the interrupted plate medium at a
relatively good. particular angle.
Next, numerical heat transfer values are compared be- The models developed in the present study are nec-
tween the present interrupted-plate heat exchanger and essary for conducting numerical simulations of porous
heat exchangers studied in other references. For com- media for various applications by solving the volume-
parison purposes, converting dimensionless numbers to averaged Navier–Stokes equations based on the porous-
be based on the hydraulic diameter, which is twice the continuum approach.
plate separation distance, we obtain that a Reynolds num-
ber of 249 and the Nuhydraulic /Pr1/3 value of 14.2 for
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
the present interrupted-plate medium for an x-directional
flow. In the study of the microfabricated involute-foil re- This work is supported by the National Science Foun-
generator (Sun et al., 2009), the Nuhydraulic /Pr1/3 value dation under grant NSF-EFRI 1038294, and University
of the regenerator is 16.4. Overall, the heat transfer val- of Minnesota, Institute for Renewable Energy and En-
ues computed in the present study are comparable to those vironment (IREE) under grant: RS-0027-11. The authors
published for these other heat exchangers. would like to thank also the Minnesota Super-Computing
Institute for the computational resources used in this
5. CONCLUSIONS work.
Hsu, C. T., On pressure-velocity correlation of steady and os- pp. 1787–1806, 1972.
cillating flows in regenerators made of wire screens, Trans. Saito, M. B. and S. de Lemos, M. J., Laminar heat transfer
ASME, vol. 121, pp. 52–56, 1999. in a porous channel simulated with a two-energy equations
Hsu, C. T., Dynamic Modeling of Convective Heat Transfer in model, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 36, pp. 1002–
Porous Media, in K. Vafai, ed., Handbook of Porous Media 1007, 2009.
(2nd ed.), Taylor and Francis Group, LLC, pp. 39–80, 2000.
Slattery, J. C., Single-phase flow through porous media, AIChE
Kamiuto, K. and Yee, S. S., Heat transfer correlations for open- J., vol. 15, pp. 866–872, 1969.
cellular porous materials, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer,
vol. 32, pp. 947–953, 2005. Sun, L., Simon, T. W., Mantell, S.C., Ibrahim, M. B.,
Gedeon, D., and Tew, R., Thermo-fluid Experiments Support-
Kuwahara, F., Shirota, M., and Nakayama, A., A numerical
ing Microfabricated Regenerator Development for a Stirling
study of interfacial convective heat transfer coefficient in two-
Space Power Engine, AIAA-2009-4579, in Proc. of the 7th
energy equation model for convection in porous media, Int. J.
Intl. Energy Conversion Engineering Conf., 2009.
Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 44, pp. 1153–1159, 2001.
Lu, W., Zhao, C. Y., and Tassou, S. A., Thermal analysis on Tew, R., Ibrahim, M., Danila, D., Simon, T. W., Mantell, S. C.,
metal-foam filled heat exchangers. Part I: Metal-foam filled Sum, L., Gedeon, D. Kelly, K., Mclean, J., Wood, G., and
pipes, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 49, pp. 2751–2761, Qiu, S., A Microfabricated Involute-Foil Regenerator for Stir-
2006. ling Engines, NASA Technical Report, NASA/CR – 2007-
215006, 2007.
Menter, F. R., Langtry, R. B., Likki, S. R., Suzen, Y. B.,
Huang, P. G., and Volker, S., A correlation based transi- Vafai, K. and Tien, C. L., Boundary and inertial effects on flow
tion model using local variables. Part I: Model formulation, and heat transfer in porous media, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer,
ASME-GT2004-53452, 2004. vol. 24, pp. 195–203, 1981.
Nakayama, A., Kuwahara, F., Umemoto, T. and Hayashi, T., Xu, C., Song, Z., Chen, L., and Zhen, Y., Numerical investiga-
Heat and fluid flow within an anisotropic porous medium, tion on porous media heat transfer in a solar tower receiver,
Transactions of ASME, vol. 124, pp. 746–753, 2002. Renewable Energy, vol. 36, pp. 1138–1144, 2011.
Nakayama, A., Kuwahara, F., and Hayashi, T., Numerical mod- Zhang, C., Shirazi, F. A., Yan, B., Terrence, W. S., Li, P. Y.,
eling for three-dimensional heat and fluid flow through a bank and Van De Ven, J., Design of an Interrupted-Plate Heat Ex-
of cylinders in yaw, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 498, pp. 139–159, changer Used in a Liquid-Piston Compression Chamber for
2004. Compressed Air Energy Storage, in Proc. of the ASME 2013
Nakayama, A., Ando, K., Yang, C., Sano, Y., Kuwahara, F., and Summer Heat Transfer Conference, 2013.
Liu, J., A study on interstitial heat transfer in consolidated Zhang, C., Wiebedink, J. H., Shirazi, A. F., Yan, B., Si-
and unconsolidated porous media, Heat Mass Transfer, vol. mon, T. W., and Li, P. Y., Numerical investigation of metal-
45, no. 11, pp. 1365–1372, 2009. foam filled liquid piston compressor using a two-energy
Patankar, S. V. and Spalding, D. B., A calculation procedure equation formulation based on experimentally validated mod-
for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional els, in Proc. of the ASME 2013 Intl. Mechanical Engineering
parabolic flows, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 15, no. 10, Congress and Exposition, Houston, TX, 2013.