Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Marguerite J. Breckheimer
Following Starbucks racial bias crisis that occurred at one of their Philadelphia locations on
April 12, Starbucks immediately jumped into action as they saw the threat to their companies
reputation. Two days after the incident, Starbucks posted a public apology. The apology
recognized the incident and mentioned that they would be reviewing their policies to prevent
situations like these from happening again. Many found this apology to be unmeaningful and
generic considering the seriousness of a racial bias issue. An article by Sarah Larson that
discusses the lessons that can be learned from this crisis says, “The short, impersonal statement
did nothing to reassure the public that the company was taking the incident seriously” (Larson,
2019). The media reacted to this apology by starting the hashtag “Boycott Starbucks”. The
following day, Starbucks CEO Kevin Johnson took to social media with a more personal
statement. He apologized for the situation and said, “You can and should expect more from us”.
In order to make the situation right, Kevin Johnson flew across the country to apologize to the
two men in person and let them have a say in how this issue could be solved. Johnson also met
with the city leaders to discuss ways they can prevent incidents like this from repeating
themselves. On Monday April 16th, Kevin Johnson made an appearance on Good Morning
America to make another public statement emphasizing Starbucks dedication to making this
situation right. Lastly, Johnson announced he would be shutting down 8,000 Starbucks locations
on May 29th to hold bias sensitivity training for employees. This had mixed responses as some
people found the training to be pointless while others thought it could help racial bias issues in
the workplace. Overall, Starbucks handled this crisis well with a few minor hiccups along the
way.
One way Starbucks could have improved their crisis management in this scenario would be to
get the initial apology out faster. Starbucks waited two days before putting out anything to the
public. According to Sarah Larson, “This happens quite often when organizations are still
gathering the facts to determine what had actually happened” (Larson, 2019). When a racial bias
incident occurs, it is crucial that companies respond almost immediately, as these crises can ruin
a company's reputation in an extremely short period of time. The fact that this crisis was brought
to social media adds another factor of urgency because things spread within seconds on social
media.
Next, I will be conducting a SWOT analysis on Starbucks as a company and their crisis
Strengths
One major strength Starbucks holds is their customer loyalty and brand recognition. Starbucks is
a giant organization with millions of customers who buy their products daily. Starbucks created
one of the most successful customer loyalty programs to date. Their rewards app allows
customers to earn points that can be redeemed for free upgrades, food, beverages, and certain
merchandise. Customers can earn points in various ways including games, visiting the store
multiple days in a row, or simply by scanning the app when you pay. This system keeps
customers coming in frequently and promotes positive brand association. Another strength
Starbucks possesses is their large global presence. Starbucks has stores in over eighty nations
and is a worldwide name. Starbucks specially customizes the products in each region in order to
appeal to those specific customers. This widens their customer base and once again promotes
brand recognition.
Weaknesses
An article on how Starbucks handled this racial bias incident discusses how Starbucks is known
for their fast-paced working environment. Although it's great that Starbucks can get your coffee
out shortly, the article says, “This can translate to the company choosing quantity over quality”
(Avila et al., 2019). In other words, the busy and overwhelmingly fast-paced work environment
can leave room for errors such as this incident. Interactions may seem impersonal and rushed
when customer service should be one of Starbucks top priorities. Another weakness Starbucks
possesses is their high prices. If you want anything other than black coffee, you’re most likely
going to pay a minimum of five dollars. With customizations and upcharges, you’re looking at
an eight-dollar cup of coffee. Starbucks' constantly rising prices may cause customers to go to a
more affordable competitor or make their coffee at home. Another major weakness Starbucks
faces is their lack of options for people with dietary restrictions. Dairy and gluten allergies are
very common and can be life threatening. Although Starbucks offers a few non-dairy
alternatives, they have a long way to go until their stores are a safe option to those who have
gluten and dairy allergies or sensitivities. This can drive customers away and cause them to go
elsewhere where more options are available or make their coffee at home.
Opportunities
One major opportunity for Starbucks that was brought up in an article covering this racial bias
and expand their customer base. According to the article, “With tasteful campaigns or thoughtful
corporate responsibility motives, Starbucks has the global power to change a community through
their financial resources, large customer and employee base, or vast range of products” (Avila et
al., 2019). Essentially by developing these campaigns Starbucks can show their care for further
promoting diversity and inclusivity both in their stores and in surrounding communities. Another
opportunity for Starbucks would be to work and collaborate alongside other companies.
Starbucks is currently affiliated with companies such as Spotify and Teavana. Collaborating with
other companies in various industries is a great way to get Starbucks to be a topic of discussion
Threats
Competitors such as Dunkin Donuts, Tim Hortons, and Caribou coffee stand as a threat to
Starbucks. All model a similar fast-paced work environment and serve their own specialty coffee
beverages. Starbucks must constantly update their menu and model exceptional customer service
in order to stay on top among other large competitors. Small local coffee shops with more
affordable prices and sustainable practices may also serve as a threat. A second threat that
Starbucks possesses is environmental risks. Starbucks makes a large carbon footprint with their
single-use plastic (cups, straws, food packaging, etc.). Starbucks needs to implement
environmentally friendly practices to run an ethical and sustainable business. The next
generation is extremely environmentally conscious, and these poor practices could drive them
away. A third threat Starbucks must face is their brand image. With this crisis, along with crises
from now and the past, Starbucks reputation is at risk. With such a large name, any negative
news about Starbucks has the power to blow up in seconds. Starbucks has to make sure they have
a good crisis management team and a thought-out plan on how to handle crises.
References
admin. (2023, April 14). Starbucks SWOT Analysis. The Strategy Story.
https://thestrategystory.com/blog/starbucks-swot-analysis/
Avila, M., Parkin, H., & Galoostian, S. (2019). $16.7 Million to save One Reputation:
Communication Research, 7, 4.
https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1108&context=pjcr
Larson, S. (2019, January 16). 7 crisis management lessons from the philadelphia
resources/7-crisis-management-lessons-from-the-philadelphia-starbucks-arrest/
The Starbucks Incident: a crisis management case study. (2018, May 18). Bernstein
a-crisis-management-case-study/#:~:text=Starbucks%20accomplished%20that%20by
%20immediately