Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract-The effect of the unbalanced current in a single-con- tions). This, commonly known as skin effect and proximity
ductor cable circuit could have more adverse impact on the low volt- effect, would increase the conductor resistance. These'effects
age system than on the medium voltage system. This is because a low
are more pronounced as the frequency becomes higher, or as
voltage cable circuit is generally sized to match the load requirement
closely, whereas a medium voltage cable circuit is often determined by the cross section of the conductor becomes larger. Thus the
the system short circuit consideration. However, the adverse impact resistance of a conductor carrying alternating current is larger
of the unbalanced current can be minimized if single conductor cables than the same conductor at the same temperature carrying
are arranged in a symmetrical configuration, or arranged in a "tri- direct current and can be expressed mathematically as follows:
angular" configuration (for Canadian practice only), if three, five, or
six cables are needed in each phase.
Rac = MFskin X MFproximity X MFtemperature X Rdc
I. INTRODUCTION (2.1)
WHEN A CABLE circuit is composed of single-conductor
cables, unequal current sharing between cables is always where
of primary concern. The unbalanced current would sometimes Rac 60 Hz (or 50 Hz) effective ac resistance
cause cable overload, and, consequently, electrical failures. at T°C,
The analysis of current distribution between cables for each Rdc dc resistance,
application is a complicated and tedious process. To protect MFskin multiplier factor due to skin effect,
the equipment from electrical failures and to ensure personnel MFproximity multiplier factor due to proximity effect,
safety, both Canadian and National Electrical Codes have MFtemperature temperature correction factor.
specific installation requirements for single-conductor cables in
parallel. However, rigidly following these installation require- Furthermore, due to the nonuniformity of the current
ments does not always result in a balanced current distribu- density, the flux linkages over the cross section of a conductor
tion. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the design engineers would also change. The flux linkages of a section near the sur-
to develop a cable configuration that will not only meet the face of a conductor are less than those of a section in the
Code requirements but will also minimize the current un- interior, and those between the nearest sections of two ad-
balances between cables. jacent conductors are greater than those of farther apart (as
The purpose of this paper is to assist engineers in their cable long as the two conductors carry current in the same direc-
circuit design by identifying various single-conductor cable tion). As a result, an unevenness of reactance exists over the
configurations which meet the codes, and their current dis- cross section of a conductor. However, in 50- or 60-Hz system
tribution. The paper will initially analyze a few important these changes are negligible. Therefore, for all practical pur-
factors influencing the cable impedance, then use the Buller poses the mutual reactance of a single conductor in a 50- or
formula to calculate cable impedances and derive the current 60-Hz system could be calculated on the basis of all other
distribution based on the differences of impedances among conductor currents situated at the center of the conductors. In
cables. Sections III and IV, more detailed discussions regarding the
effective ac resistance and reactance widl be presented.
II. BACKGROUND
In any unshielded ac-carrying conductor, the magnetic field III. EFFECTIVE AC RESISTANCE
around the axis of the conductor produces a nonuniformity of In the following sections, discussions of the factors influ-
the current density over the cross section of the conductor; encing the effective ac resistance of single-conductor cables
i.e., current density in the outer sections is higher than in the will be presented along with some figures for easy reference.
center, and current density in the farthest sections between
two conductors is higher than that of the nearest sections (as A. The Influence of Skin Effect on ac Resistance
long as two conductors carry the current in the same direc- It has been mathematically proven that a conductor or a
combination of conductors of certain proportionate shape and
Paper PID 83-33, approved by the Pulp and Paper Industry Com- a certain value of f/Rdc will have a definite value of Rac/Rdc
mittee of the IEEE Industry Applications Society for presentation at This is true of isolated conductors in a single-phase or poly-
the 1983 Pulp and Paper Industry Technical Conference, New Orleans,
LA, May 10-13. Manuscript released for publication June 21, 1983. phase system, where f is the frequency in hertz and Rdc is the
The author is with the Simons-Eastern Company, P. 0. Box 1286, dc resistance in ohm per 1000 ft [l] . Dwight provided most of
Atlanta, GA 30301. the contributions in the research of skin effect. Fig. was
RAC RAC
RoC 1.0
ISOLATED
1.10
1.08'
.08
.06
.06 0 2.6z
1.04 I-4d -
1.04'
1.02
1.02
_F fl-
_____- 25 50 75 JRDC 2i 50 75 J RDc
0 o
1 11 I I
:1
1
I ::EI
00 0 0 0 0 0
LO
N o
0
) '~
0 0
in
rl
0
o
olin 0
Fig. 1. Skin effect in 1-kV conductors. R dc in Q2/1000 ft, F in hertz. Fig. 2. Proximity effect in 1-kV conductors. Rdc in Q1/1000 ft, F in
hertz.
taken from one of his papers, showing skin effect in isolated
solid wires. RAC
The difference between the skin effect of a stranded cable RISOLATED
and a solid wire of the same resistance is mainly due to the
spiraling of the strands and is approximately inversely propor- 1.01
tional to the pitch of the spiraling. Since this difference is I 0d
negligible in a 50- or 60-Hz system, Fig. 1 can also be used for
isolated stranded cables in the 50- or 60-Hlz system.
of the ac resistance when the conductors are near each other ~'. Qu'o
eQ
2
o
m
Q
e
:E
Q
o
0 0 0 0
In addition to the skin effect and proximity effect, the zcon- For aluminum or ACSR conductors
ductor temperature rise would also cause the resistance in-
crease. The appropriate resistance temperature correc tion (228 + T\
factors can be determined from the following formulas. RT= 248 - ) R20
For copper conductors
(228 + T
1234.5 + T\ 253 R25 (2)
= V
254.5 1R2
where
(234.5 + T T temperature in degree centrigrade,
259 / (1) RT resistance at temperature T°C,
WU: SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLES IN PARALLEL 379
RAC TABLE I
12 0 R ISOLATED RESISTANCE IN 52/1000 ft AT 20°C AND 250C OF CLASS B
STRANDED COPPER AND ALUMINUM CONDUCTOR
000
CondLector 200C 25 OC
14 5 Size,
AWG or MCM CU AL CU AL
INSIDE
CONDUCTOR 2 0.159 0.262 0.162 0.267
1.0 1 0.126 0.206 0.129 0.211
1/0 0.100 0.165 0.102 0.168
OUTITSIDE 2/0 0.0795 0.131 0.0811 0.133
(c/O NDUCTOR 3/0
4/0
0.063 0.103 0.0642 0.105
1.05 0.050 0.0821 0.0509 0.0836
250 0.0423 0.0695 0.0431 0.0708
300 0.0353 0.0579 0.0360 0.0590
350 0.0302 0.0496 0.0308 0.0505
F 400 0.0264 0.0434 0.0270 0.0442
25 50 75 RDC 500 0.0212 0.0348 0.0216 0.0354
I II I I 600 0.0176 0.0290 0.0180 0.0295
o
0
o~
0 0 0 750 0.0141 0.0232 0.0144 0.0236
e o0 0
N z s- 0
1000 0.0106 0.0174 0.0108 0.0177
Fig. 4. Proximity effect ratio in 1-kV conductors. Rdc in Q/1000 ft,
F in hertz.
A =ln(Dl/1r),
R20 resistance at temperature 20°C, Dkk distance from cable 1 to cable k (inches),
R25 resistance at temperature 250C. r radius of conductor (inches),
n number of cables in group,
D. DC Resistance of Conductors Ik current in cable k (amperes).
DC resistances in ohms per 1000 ft per conductor at 200C Note that (3) is valid only if the following assumptions are
and 250C stranded copper and aluminum conductors are correct:
shown in Table I [4].
1) the current in cable k,i.e., Ik, is expressed as a vector;
E. Effective ac Resistance Calculation 2)ny=, Ik = °;
As indicated in Fig. 1, the ac resistance of a single-conduc- 3) the current is uniformly distributed over the conduc-
tor cable is the dc resistance compounded by the factors tor;
relating to skin effect, proximity effect, and temperature rise. 4) no shielding;
The calculation results tabulated in Tables 11-V are the effec- 5) for the mutual partial linkages due to the flux pro-
tive ac resistance of 1 -kV single-conductor cables in four of the duced by other cable currents it can be assumed that
commonly used cable configurations. linkages are equal to the total linkages that would
exist with a line 'conductor situated at the center of
IV. REACTANCES the actual conductor.
Many formulas have been published for the reactance of
parallel single-conductor cables. However, if discounting the The technique of reactance calculations based on (3) can be
skin effect and proximity effect on reactance, the Buller's demonstrated in Table VI where the reactance of cable 1 in a
formula [5] appears to be the easiest to handle, that is, group of n cables is calculated. Therefore,
S = sum of products
X = 0.023 K' +A +
k=2
[(InD--
k-DI (k 1)
)
A+VFl D~lk
=A+z[n Dl k-_ 1I]].'
(
k- I i]
-
k-2 IDl(k-1) J=1 II1
(3) Thus
cable 1 reactance = 0.23 (K' + S')
where
X 60-Hz (or 50-Hz) reactance of a single-conductor
= 0.23 K'+ A + [ in lk
k=2 Di (k-1 )
cable in a group of n parallel cables (ohms per
1000 feet) (Q/1000 ft),
K' constant =,0.25 for concentric stranded cable, (j= II)3
380 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, VOL. IA-20, NO. 2, MARCH/APRIL 1984
TABLE II
EFFECTIVE AC RESISTANCE OF 1 kV SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLE WITH TRIANGULAR CONFIGURATION
AND SPACED ONE CABLE DIAMETER APART
00
TABLE III
EFFECTIVE AC RESISTANCE OF 1-kV SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLE WITH TRIANGULAR CONFIGURATION
AND NO SPACING IN BETWEEN
Multiplier Eff.AC
Cable Conductor DC Resist.
AWIi Overall Dia. Resistance 60 Temp. Ohm per
or Dia. Ohm/lOOOft R Skin roximity Effect lOOOft
MCM (Inches) (Inches) @200C DC Effect Effect @ 900C @90°C
TABLE IV
EFFECTIVE AC RESISTANCE OF 1-kV SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLE WITH FLAT CONFIGURATION AND
SPACED ONE CABLE DIAMETER APART
Multiplier Eff.AC
Cable Con- DC Resist.
AWG OverI' ductor Resist. 60 Temp. Ohm per
or Dia. Dia. Ohm/1000' RDC Skin Proximity Effec 1000 ft
MCM (Inch) (Inch) @20'C D Effect Effect _ 90'C @90°C
OC* IC** OC* IC**
2/0 1.07 0.42 0.0795 27.50 1.0 1.0006 1.001 1.28 0.102 0.102
4/0 1.20 0.53 0.05 36.64 1.01 1.002 1.oo8 1.28 .o065 o.065
250 1.31 0.58 0.0423 37.66 1.01 1.003 1.01 1.28 .055 0.055
500 1.55 0.81 0.0212 53.20 1.03 1.013 1.051 1.28 .028 0.029
750 1.78 1.0o 0.0141 65.20 1.055 1.029 1.118 1.28 .020 0.021
1ooo 1.89 1.152 0.0106 75.24 1.095 1.048 1.193 1.28 .016 o.018
000
* -
Outside Conductor
** -
Inside Conductor
Equation (3) is very general and can be applied to any cable ship as long as their magnitudes and phase relationship are
arrangement as long as known. For a three-phase system the following vector relation-
ships may exist between currents (Fig. 5):
k=l
k = 0.
IA IA LO = IA
IB = IBL240 = a2IB
It can also be applied to cables of different sizes, carrying
different currents. These currents may have any phase relation- IC=IcL1200 =aIc
WU: SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLES IN PARALLEL 381
TABLE V
EFFECTIVE AC RESISTANCE OF 1-kV SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLE WITH FLAT CONFIGURATION AND
NO SPACING IN BETWEEN
TABLE VI
CABLE 1 REACTANCE CALCULATION
where
j,k= 1, ,n
IA n
Fig. 5. IA==
I
Iaj
for a balanced current distributed circuit where n
IB = z Ibi
a=--1 /2 + Nf3/2i
a2 =-1/2 -NV/2, n
i-c = z Icj.
and
1 +a+a2 =0. V. IMPEDANCES
Once the effective ac resistance and reactance of a single-
If IA = IB = IC, then conductor cable are established, the impedance of the cable
can simply be calculated as follows:
Lak= 1 Ibi = 2 Icak =
Ia k Ia*k Ia k Z = Rac' +X (4)
382 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, VOL. IA-20, NO. 2, MARCH/APRIL 1984
TABLE VII
ALLOWABLE CABLE FILL AREA FOR SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLES IN LADDER OR VENTILATED
TROUGH CABLE TRAY FOR CABLES RATED 2000 V OR LESS
i.e., one with one cable diameter spacing or more apart, and XX [8], where
the other with less than one cable diameter spacing in be- Xm = 7rf(0l404l~ $)s
tween. The most commonly used configurations on a 24-in Xm= 27Tf .11404lol I.1/ft
tray with one cable diameter spacing are shown in Figs. 6-10. \m0
Y10
The most common configurations on a 24-in tray with no A = 27rf(0. 1404 log1o2) ,uQ/ft
spacing between trays cables are shown in Figs. 1 1-15
B = 27rf(0. 1404 log1 0 5) ,uQ/ft
VIII. CALCULATION RESULTS
f frequency,
With the help of a programmable calculator the current dis- S spacing between center of cables (inches),
tribution for 1 kV parallel single-conductor cables sizing from ?yt mean radius of shield (inches),
2/0 to 1000 kcmil, in all configuration listed in Sections 7.1 I conductor current (amperes).
and 7.2 have been calculated and the results are tabulated in For the 60-Hz system
Tables VIII-XIX.
s
IX. SHIELD VOLTAGE Xm 52.92 log, 0
=
7m
A = 15.93 i4/ft
Shielding of a cable is to confine the dielectric field within
the cable so that an excessive voltage stress between conductor B= 36.99 ,uQ/ft
and insulation can be eliminated. This is a standard practice
for a single-conductor cable rated 5 kV and above. The shield voltage in some cases may cause current discharge
Since single-conductor cables are normally grounded at one and therefore become hazardous to personnel. The usual safe
point only, a voltage would build up in the shield. The magni- voltage is about 25 V for cable having a nonmetallic covering
tude of this so called shield voltage depends on the mutual in- over the shield. Table XXI indicates the calculated maximum
ductance to other cables, the current in all the conductors, and allowable cable length for single-conductor cables with shield
the distance to the grounded point. grounded at one point only.
If the following assumptions are correct, i.e.,
1) no proximity effect, X. DISCUSSION
2) mathematically perfect cables and spacing, and equal
shield resistances, The following bases were used in the current distribution
3) equal conductor currents, calculation.
4) open circulated shields not grounded at more than one 1) All single-conductor cables were in parallel. However, the
point, current unbalance would become negligible if cables were
5) no disturbing magnetic or conducting bodies within the transposed in the tray.
field of influence, 2) l-kV aluminum armor single-conductor cables were
considered in the calculation. The results could also be applied
then the shield voltage can be calculated as shown in Table to 5-kV single-conductor unshielded cables, because the in-
WU: SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLES IN PARALLEL 385
--D "FLAT"
5'
"STACK"
I
J5 p wx 3o
W:3D
(a) (b)
Fig. 6. Two cables per phase. (a) Canadian practice. (b) American
practice.
T Q .c')l
.:
"STACK" "FLAT" (for 500 MCM -1000 MCM
conductors)
(_
) Cc3)(
-- - Mfz_vX'I
A
I
'STACK"
1-~ W.3o
I
I&- s .D l 7 a (a I
I ;1U)
-
ft- I=
tin
1
--L
U lull W9 u W 9I
"TRIANGULAR"
-I
"FLAT"
(a) (b)
Fig. 8. Four cables per phase. (a) Canadian practice. (b) American
practice.
386 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, VOL. IA-20, NO. 2, MARCH/APRIL 1984
18"
"STACK" a
"FLAT" (for 500 MCM - 1000 MCM
conductors)
1e
18
a a CD l
"TR ANGULAR" "FLAT" (for 250 MCM conductors)
(a) (b)
Fig. 9. Five cables per phase. (a) Canadian practice. (b) American
pI ractice.
1-A 54W3oD
_L
T
18
~~ s6aa
I
lk® tst?ws @ 4.s
iti~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
c I
8
"STACK"
"FLAT" (for 500 MCM -
1000 MCM
conductors)
9\~4 @ GsC3D
5S.Zo .Ws 3r t1 .31
1: bAs---I
A @ @.
IBM
We3o
(typicAL) "FLAT"
I
(ryricAL )
"TR I ANGULAR" "TR I ANGULAR"
(a) (b)
Fig. 11. Two cables per phase. (a) Canadian practice. (b) American
practice.
WU: SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLES IN PARALLEL 387
"FLAT"
(a) (b)
Fig. 12. Three cables per phase. (a) Canadian practice. (b) American
practice.
* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~18
"FLAT"
"FLAT"
Fig. 14. Five cables per phase. (a) Canadian practice. (b) American
practice.
388 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, VOL. IA-20, NO. 2, MARCH/APRIL 1984
1F
"FLAT"
18- IS
-Ok64)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
''TRIANGULAR" (for 500 MCM - "TRIANGULAR" (for 500 MCM -
1000 MCM conductors) 1000 MCM conductors)
TABLE VIII
CANADIAN PRACTICE-i-kV 1000-kcmil SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLE (1.89-in OVERALL DIAMETER)
Stack 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
B Triangular 26.o8 25.57 |24.83| 23.53 27-75 25.81 24.28 22.15 20.80 23.57 25.95 29.68
5 A Triangular 24.39 22.82 18.60 17.63 16.57 19.17 17.57 15.50 28.25 19.51 15.23 19.48 25.61 15.82 23.85
Stack 18.57 18.25 20.98 21.48 20.73 19.55 19.48 18.96 18.74 23.27 18.30 18.17 18.00 17.77 27.76
B Triangular 24.43 11.97 22.19 20.61 20.81 21.27 19.85 18.80 17.27 22.82 16.68 19.12 21.22 24.35 18.63
6 A Triangular 21.05 20.85 16.27 14.49 14.10 13.24 15.44 14.16 12.43 24.67 19.38 13.92 11.98 14.92 19.12 12.28 16.85 24.85
Stack 15.22 15.28 1 5.22 15.28 19.50 19.50 16.00 15.79 16.00 15.79 18.21 18.21 15.43 15.12 15.43 15.12 19.45 19. 45
B Triangular 18.79 18.23 17.07 15.67 15.51 14.72 17.13 16.00 15.18 14.06 20.50 17.13 13.66 15.74 17.71 20.54 14.33 18.03
* A - One cable Diameter
B - No Spacing
WU: SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLES IN PARALLEL 389
TABLE XXI
MAXIMUM LENGTH (FEET) FOR 15-kV SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLES WITH SHIELD GROUNDED
AT ONE END ONLY
AWG
®S=2d ~ iLS=d
S=2dA-
S=d (D=2
0 0
or ~JA®
_________ i(Note 1) (Note 1) (Note 2)
CANADA AMERICA CANADA AMERICA
Note 1: Maximum length applicable to Canadian and American practice for size from 250 MCM to 1000 MCM.
Note 2: This configuration is not allowed in the American Practice, thus maximum lengths applied to
Canadian Practice only.
65
* - According to National Electrical Code Section 318-2, no smaller than 250 MCM Single Conductor Cable
allowed to be used in tray, thus maximum length applicable to only Canadian Practice for size 2/0 and 4/0.
TABLE IX
AMERICAN PRACTICE-1-kV 1000-kcmij SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLE (1.89-in OVERALL DIAMETER)
TABLE X
CANADIAN PRACTICE-1-kV 750-kcmil SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLE (1.78-in OVERALL DIAMETER)
Stack 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 _ __ 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
B Triangular 26.28 25.56 21..71. 23.142 27.38 25.73 24.39 22.1.9 20.97 23.65 25.92 29.1.6
5 A TIriangular 24.4.0 22.35 18.51 18.00 16.71. 19.19 17.79 15.91 27.13 19.98 15.1.2 19.66 25.78 15.91. 23.20
Stack 18.77 18.52 20.82 21.21. 20.65 19.511 19.1.6 18.97 18.78 23.29 18.29 18.18 18l.01 17.82 27.70
B Triangular 21.71 20.90 19.95 18.70 18.741. 21.06 19.85 18.91 17.53 22.61. 16.83 19.17 21.18 21.17 118.65
6 A Triangular 21.20 20.19 16.08 11.87 14.30 13.37 15.53 14..39 12.80 23.1.1 19.37 14.1.7 12.25 15.27 19.71. 12.1.5 16.68 23.60
Stack 15.36 15.1.3 15.36 15.1.3 19.21 19.21 16.011 15.82 16.01 15.82 18.18 18.18 15.1.0 15.11. 15.1.0 15.11. 19.1.6 1 9.1.6
B Triangular -118.81 18.06 16.941. 15.61 15.71. 14.81. 17.02 116.01. 15.33 11.30 20.06 17.25 13.83 15.83 17.70 20.39 14.4.1 17.83
*A -One cable diameter
B -No spacing
TABLE XI
AMERICAN PRACTICE-1-kV 750-kcmil SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLE (1.78-in OVERALL DIAMETER)
______ _____ Triangular 26.28 .25.56 24.71. 23.421.2 _ 27.38 25.73 24..39 22.1.9 _ __20.97 23.65 25.92 29.1.6 ___
5 A ~~~Flat 20.09 120.97 19.59 22.26 17.09 19.9 197 19.86 19.21. 21.23 19.28 19q.16 19.07 18.71 23.78
B1 Flat 15.02 20.07 27.29 15.1.0 22.231 21.1.5 20.1.8 17.52 21.1.5 19.10 _ __23.79 19.65 15.95 23.13 17.1.8
Triangular 21.71 20.90 19.95 18.70 18.71. 21.06 19.85 18.91 17.53 22.61. 16.83 19.17 21.18 24..17 18.65
6 A ~~~Flat 16.419 16.1.9 17.02 17.02 16.1.9 16.4.9 16.82 16.82 16.3636 1.6 1682 16.82 1.5 6.85 16.29 16.2 9 1.5 6.85
a Flat 11.96 15.91 22.13 11.96 15.91 22.13 17.95 17.39 14.66 17.95 17.39 l14.66 20.21. 16.62 13.11. 20.21. 16.62 13.11.
*A
____Triangular
-One cable diameter
18.81 F18.06 1l6.91. 15.61 15.71. l1.1 7.02 116.01. 15.33 11.430 20.06 1.5 3.83 15.83 1 .7.70 120.39 l14.41 117.83
B No spacing
WU: SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLES IN PARALLEL
391
TABLE XII
CANADIAN PRACTICE-1-kV 500-kcmil SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLE (1.55-in OVERALL DIAMETER)
3 A Triangular 38.67 132.26 29.07 1o.0.3 31.51 28.36 26.35 32.76 40.89
Stack 28.19 28.00 1.3.81 33.37 33.51. 33.11 32.89 34.02 33.09 _________
B Triangular 35.15 33.01. 31.81___ 35.17 33.12 31.72 29.18 33.11 37.72
1. A Triangular 28.55 125.66 22.63 23.16 24..B8 23.61 21.58 29.91. 20.15_ 25.1.6 32.35 22.03 ___
Stack 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
B Triangular 26.67 25.57 24.58 23.17 26.73 25.59 21.59 23.09 21.22 23.77 215.89 29.12
5 A Triangular 24.0121.25 17.92 18.1.1. 18.38 19.12 18.15 16.61. 25.36 20.73 __ 15.75 19.98 25.97 16.07 22.23 _
Stack 19.11 18.96 20.58 20.87 20.1.8 19.1.1 19.38 18.95 18.80 23.1.6 ______18.28 18.21 18.06 17.92 27.51.4 ____
B Triangular 21.90 20.80 19.77 18.50] 19.03 20.67 19.83 19.12 18.02 22.35 17.06 19.27 21.13 23.89 18.66
6 A Triangular 21.31 19.16 15.67 15.61] 14.68 13.57 15.55 14.71. 13.1.8 21.51 19.25 15.1.6 12.67 15.87 20.66 12.67 16.38 21.75
Stack 15.39 15.67 15.59 15.67] 18.75 18.75 15.99 15.85 15.99 15.85 18.16 18.16 151.35 15.17 15.35 15.17 19.1.8 19.48
B Triangular 18.85 17.80 16.71 15.1.1.16.16 15.03 16.79 16.12 15.58 14.75 19.31. 17.1.3 14.10 16.00 17.71 20.16 14.53 17.51
*A - One cable diameter
B - No spacing
TABLE XIII
AMERICAN PRACTICE-1-kV 500-kcmil SIN'GLE-CONDUCTOR CABLE (1.55-in OVERALL DIAMETER)
TABLE XIV
CANADIAN PRACTICE-1-kV 250-kcmil SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLE (1.31-in OVERALL DIAMETER)
TABLE XV
AMERICAN PRACTICE-1-kV 250-kcmil SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLE (1.31-in OVERALL DIAMETER)
B Flat 21.72 125.53 29.23 23.53 - - 27.68 24.89 122.0o1 25.39 | | 26.47 25.18 |22.|9 25.1S.
Triangular 26.98 25.51 24.43 23.08 25.63 25.25 24.87 24.25 | ___22.13 24.17 25-76 27.941 _
5 A Flat 15.35 20.58 26.26 15.67 22.15 23.46 19.70 16.05 22.96 17.83_ 21.65 20.53 17.22 21.80 18.80
B F |at 17.1120.29 2J.51 17.50 21.60 22.29 19.90 17.416 21.82 18.53 21.31 20.20 18.20 21.20 19.10
Triangular 21.59 20.74 20.02 19.32 18.341 20.541 20.30 20.07 19.80 19.29 17.41 18.91 19.95 21.03 22.70
6 A Flat 12.26 16.39 21.35 12.26 16.39 21.35 19.91 16.76 13.33 19.91 16.76 13.33 18.20 17.48 14.32 18.20 17.48 14.32
B Flat 13.98 16.60 19.42 13.98 16.60 19.42 18.76 16.71 14.53 18.76 16.71 14.53 17.87 16.96 15.17 17.87 16.96 15.17
Triangular 18.31 17.44.16.89 16.41 15.87 15.08 17.11. 16.97 16.82 16.65 16.42 15.39 14.33 |15.50 | 16.26| 16.96 17-79 19.60
A - One cable diameter
8 - No spacing
WU: SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLES IN PARALLEL 393
TABLE XVI
CANADIAN PRACTICE-1-kV 410-kcmil SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLE (1 .20-in OVERALL DIAMETER)
TABLE XVII
AMERICAN PRACTICE-i-kV 4/0-kcmil SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLE (1.20-in OVERALL DIAMETER)
TABLE XVIII
CANADIAN PRACTICE-i-kV 2/0-kcmil SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLE (1.07-in QVERALL DIAMETER)
TABLE XIX
AMERICAN PRACTICE-1-kV 2/0-kcmil SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLE (1.07-in OVERALL DIAMETER)
ABECONFIGURATION CURRENT DISTRIBUTION (1
sulation thickness difference between 41 kV and 5 kV single- purpose of consistency. Therefore, these results present a
conductor cables would not significantly alter calculation, wider unbalanced current spread than the measurements taken
results. from the actual installations.
3) The iteration procedure was used for the calculation, In designing a single-conductor cable circuit, the following
i.e., assuming initial balanced currents to all cables and then points would be useful for an engineer to know.
repeat the same calculations with the newly obtained values 1) The cable reactance plays an important role in determin-
until all. values converged. However, due to the difficulty of ing the current distribution and is a function of distance be-
convergence in some of the unsymmetrical cable configura- tween cables.
tions, all the -results shown were from the first iteration for the 2) To achieve a balanc'ed current distribution for a group of
WU: SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLES IN PARALLEL 395
TABLE XX
FORMULAS FOR OPEN-CIRCUITED SHIELD VOLTAGE-SINGLE-CONDUCTOR CABLES
CABLE C B
CABLE - A ) I 2 2 I B 2
CABLE - C CABLE Xm)I 2 3(X m +A)
XI + (X -A)
m
-2 3(X m +A+ 2)2
2 + (Xm2-
_ )
CABLE -B I Xm I XI,,2
x A