Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Green consumption, as defined by Manakotla & Jauhari (2007) and Pizam (2009), is
synonymous with being environmentally friendly, responsible, and eco-conscious. Green
products are those that do not have adverse effects on the environment or human health
(Maichum, et al., 2016). Ottman (1998), as cited by Mei, et al. (2012), suggests that green
products are predominantly non-toxic items made and packaged with recyclable
materials. In essence, eco-friendly products, which cause minimal harm to the
environment, are categorized as green products (Mei, et al., 2012). Moreover, "green
products" and "environmental products" are commonly used business terms denoting
products designed to protect the environment by reducing energy consumption and
minimizing waste (Pavan & Payal, 2010).
Srivastava (2007) highlights that growing concerns about environmental issues like air
pollution, resource depletion, and global warming have driven the development of green
products. Consequently, individuals express their environmental concerns through the
purchase of green products (Maichum, et al., 2016). Green consumers are those who aim
to address environmental problems through their purchases, considering the
environmental impacts of their consumption (Mostafa, 2007). These consumers prioritize
products with environmentally friendly attributes (Mei, et al., 2012).
Research on green purchase intention, especially for eco-friendly products, has been
ongoing since the 1970s, emphasizing the role of variables like knowledge, awareness,
beliefs, and social demographics in shaping consumer behavior (Mei et al., 2012). Five
key variables consistently found to influence green purchase intention include.
1. Environmentalattitude(Jobber,2000;Mostafa,2007;Ling,2013).
2. Environmental knowledge (Lee et al., 2012; Mei et al., 2012; Azian
et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013; Aman et al., 2012).
3. Environmental concern (Diamantopoulos et al., 2003; Jain & Kaur, 2004; Kim &
Choi, 2005; Smith & Paladino, 2010; Aman et al., 2012; Nath et al., 2013;
Vazifehdoust et al., 2013; Dagher et al., 2015; Maichum et al., 2016).
4. Social influence (Lee, 2008; Mei et al., 2012; Ling, 2013).
5. Eco-label (Leire & Thidell, 2005; D’Souza et al., 2006; Rashid, 2009;
Vazifehdoust et al., 2013).
The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), which incorporates attitudes, subjective norms,
perceived behavioral control, and knowledge, is often used to understand intention and
behavior (Ajzen, 1991, cited by Kong et al., 2014). TPB posits that intention plays a
pivotal role in encouraging individuals to execute behavior, and a stronger intention is
associated with a higher likelihood of taking action. Similarly, Chan and Lau (2000)
demonstrate that purchase intention significantly influences actual purchase behavior
based on a model that combines TPB and the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) by
Fishbein (1980).
TRA, the precursor to TPB, revolves around the concept of intention, which encompasses
an individual's motivation, awareness, and decisions related to a specific behavior
(Marius and Metlen, 2013). TRA posits that a significant portion of human behaviors can
be predicted based on intention because behavior is believed to depend on intention
(Marius and Metlen, 2013). It suggests that attitudes toward behaviors and the subjective
norms associated with those behaviors are instrumental in determining behavioral
intentions (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975). TRA has been successfully applied and refined in
various previous studies to explore and explain human decision-making processes
(Vazifehdoust et al., 2013). Numerous studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in
predicting human decisions and behaviors across various situations (Vazifehdoust et al.,
2013). Consequently, TRA has been widely utilized in diverse research to gain insights
into the psychological mechanisms guiding individual behavioral decisions (Han & Kim,
2010). It has also played a pivotal role in investigations related to green purchase
behavior (Baker & Ozaki, 2008), particularly in studies examining customer purchase
intentions (Lee & Green, 1990 cited by Mei et al., 2012).
However, TRA faces limitations when applied to situations where individuals may have
the intention to perform a behavior but are unable to do so due to external factors like
income or product availability (Paul et al., 2016). In response to this limitation, the
Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) was developed as an extension of TRA by Icek Ajzen
in 1985. TPB incorporates the concept of perceived behavioral control, addressing the
voluntary nature of certain behaviors and the influence of external constraints. This
extension makes TPB more suitable and applicable in contemporary contexts, where
individuals may aspire to engage in green purchasing but face practical obstacles. In
summary, TPB extends and enhances the predictive power of TRA, providing a more
comprehensive framework for understanding and studying behavioral intentions.
The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) is a comprehensive model that builds upon the
variables of the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) by incorporating the concept of
Perceived Behavioral Control. This extension allows TPB to explore the influence of
various factors, including cognitive, social, and voluntary aspects, on customer
behavioral intentions (Han et al., 2010). Consequently, TPB has been widely endorsed as
the most effective model for predicting consumer intentions (Yadav et al., 2016).
Numerous studies in the field of purchase intention have advocated for TPB's suitability
because intention lies at the core of its framework (Liobikiene et al., 2016). As a result,
TPB is frequently chosen as the primary conceptual model in research related to green
purchase intentions.
In constructing the research model for this study, a synthesis of literature reviews
conducted by multiple authors on green purchase intentions has led to the development of
a new conceptual model. This model is designed to align with the specific focus of this
study and integrates elements from TPB along with several variables drawn from other
literature within the realm of green purchase behavior.
Environmental Attitude
General attitudes encompass individuals' beliefs that translate into actions related to their
concerns (Schwartz, 1992, as cited by Dagher et al., 2015). Specifically, when it comes to
environmental attitudes, these beliefs often manifest as a willingness to pay more for
environmentally friendly products (Laroche et al., 2001). Lee (2008) defines
environmental attitude as how people perceive their role in environmental protection,
reflecting their awareness of environmental concerns. Rashid et al. (2009) offer a slightly
different perspective, viewing environmental attitudes as individuals' conjectures about
what has positive or negative impacts on the environment.
It is well-documented that attitudes are a significant factor influencing behavior and
behavioral intentions (Kotchen and Reiling, 2000). Numerous studies have explored the
relationship between environmental behavior and environmental attitudes (Dagher et al.,
2015). For instance, Balderjahn and Katz's 1998 study found that environmental attitudes
positively influence environmental behavior (Dagher et al., 2015). In essence, attitudes
encompass beliefs and actions that can translate into behavioral intentions (Vazifehdoust
et al., 2013). Thus, intentions are influenced by attitudes, suggesting that more positive
attitudes lead to greater intentions to engage in a particular behavior (Maichum et al.,
2016). Additionally, Maichum et al. (2016) highlight that attitudes serve as predictors of
purchase intention. However, it's worth noting that environmental behavior is often
considered independent of environmental attitudes (Smith et al., 1994, and Berger &
Corbin, 1992, as cited by Dagher et al., 2015). This body of literature underscores that
green purchase intention may or may not be influenced by environmental attitudes.
The link between environmental attitudes and green purchase intention has been explored
in various academic reports (Ling, 2013). An examination in Egypt by Mostafa (2007)
found that environmental attitudes play a crucial role in green purchase intention.
Similarly, it is believed that purchase intention is associated with attitude, highlighting
the connection between environmental attitudes and green purchase intention (Jobber,
2000). Moreover, Irland (1993), Schwepker and Cornwell (1991, as cited by Ling, 2013)
also proposed that consumers' environmental attitudes can determine the extent of their
green purchase intention. However, Lee (2008) reported that the green purchase intention
of Hong Kong's young generation is not significantly influenced by environmental
attitudes. Likewise, based on a study in Malaysia by Tan (2013), it is suggested that
individuals' green purchase intention is not substantially impacted by their environmental
attitudes. Consequently, the following hypothesis is posited:
Numerous studies have explored the relationship between green purchase intention and
environmental knowledge (Azian et al., 2013). Existing literature consistently suggests
that environmental knowledge is a crucial factor with a positive influence on consumers'
green purchase intention (Wang et al., 2014). When consumers possess environmental
knowledge, the likelihood of their green purchase intention increases, as knowledge
enhances their awareness of environmental issues (Aman et al., 2012). Similarly,
environmental knowledge heightens consumers' awareness of environmental concerns,
leading to an increase in green purchase intention (Lee et al., 2012). Rashid (2009)
reported that environmental knowledge directly impacts the consumer purchase decision-
making process, including their green purchase intention. Furthermore, a study among
Penang volunteers conducted by Elham Rahbar et al. (2011), as cited in Mei et al. (2012),
concluded that environmental knowledge significantly influences green purchase
intention. However, some studies have pointed out that environmental knowledge does
not necessarily influence green purchase intention (Paco & Raposo, 2009, as cited by Mei
et al., 2012). Based on these findings, the following hypothesis is proposed:
Social influence
Social influence can be likened to peer pressure, a concept discussed in Mei et al.'s theory
(2012). Cohan (2009) also introduced the concept of peer pressure, which involves
individuals experiencing psychological pressure when they compare themselves to others.
Peer pressure leads individuals to engage in behaviors they may not want to maintain
their relationships with their peers (Ling, 2013). Research has shown that information
obtained from online discussions has a more significant impact on consumers' purchase
intentions than information provided by marketers (Ling, 2013).
Additionally, Lee (2008) reported that social influence is the primary factor affecting the
purchase intentions of young people in Hong Kong. Therefore, in the context of this
study, social influence, such as online communication, may indeed have effects on green
purchase intention. Furthermore, Mei et al. (2012) cite Kalafatis et al. (1999) in their
support of the idea that social influence is the most potent factor influencing consumers'
purchase intentions for green products in the UK. Based on these observations and
theories, the following hypothesis is proposed:
Eco-label
However, it's important to note that eco-labeling alone may not definitively determine
consumers' purchasing decisions. Leire and Thidell (2005) argue that eco-labels can be
complex and may not always effectively influence green purchase intentions.
Additionally, compared to conventional products, accessing eco-label information on
green products may be more challenging due to its complexity, potentially limiting the
impact of eco-labels on green purchase intention. Considering these factors, the following
hypothesis is proposed:
Preliminary survey and research will be conducted to establish and test initial hypotheses.
This qualitative phase will help in understanding the key factors that affect the green
purchase intention of Vietnamese customers.
According to common rules, when analyzing and testing the reliability of the scale with
Cronbach's Alpha coefficient, EFA exploratory factor analysis and regression analysis,
the research sample must be large enough and ensure the sample size. Hair et al (2016)
proposed that the research sample must be 5 times the total number of observed variables:
M ≥ m x 5, where m is the number of observed variables, M is the number of samples in
the study.
Thus, the minimum number of observations to ensure the requirements for Cronbach's
Alpha testing, EFA analysis and regression analysis:
M = 19 x 5 = 95 (observations)
Within the scope of this study, the research team used a dataset consisting of 160 usable
(excluded 8 responses were deleted because those responses were uncompleted).
The study used an online survey conducted through a Google Form, by mainly
convenient sampling method to investigate the green purchase intention of Vietnamese
customers. Also, the Google Form was uploaded to various FaceBook pages and groups
to help reach a wide range of participants. Collected data were processed using SPSS 26.
1. Environmental Attitude:
2. Environmental Knowledge:
EK I understand about the Greenhouse Effect 1 2 3 4 5
1
3. Environmental Concern
4. Social Influence
5. Eco-label