In the court of Dr. D N Bhardwaj, Ld.

ADJ,
Sonepat

Mee Kaur etc. v/s Santosh etc.

Civil Appeal

Affidavit of one of the appellant

namely Om Braham s/o Ramji Lal r/o
Mohalla Jatwara, Sonepat

I, Om Braham s/o Ramji Lal r/o Mohalla

Jatwara, Sonepat, do hereby solemnly affirm

and declare as under:

1. That the deponent alongwith other

appellants filed the present appeal against

the respondents which is most likely to be

succeed on the grounds mentioned therein

and the same is fixed for 03.07.2019 for

filing the affidavit to the effect that the

correct address of the respondent no. 2..

2. That at the time of filing of the appeal,

the appellants gave the address of the

respondent no. 2, which is mentioned in the

memorandum of the appeal, is last known

 address of the respondent no. 2 to the

knowledge of the appellants.

3. That in the above noted appeal the

respondent no. 2 was served upon on the

above said address but the respondent no. 2

intentionally and deliberately with

malafide intention did not appear before

the Hon’ble Court and avoiding the court

proceeding.

4. That the presence of the respondent no. 2

may kindly be secured by way of substituted

service i.e. through publications on the

address mentioned in the memorandum of

appeal.

Deponent

Verification: Verified that the contents of

this affidavit are true and correct to the best

of my knowledge and belief. Verified at Sonepat

On:

Deponent
 In the court of Ms. Saravpreet Kaur Ld. JMIC,
Sonepat

M/s Ganga Jamuna v/s Ms. Rangoli Projects

Complaint u/s 138 NI Act

Application for taking necessary

action against the accused no. 1 to 3

R/Madam,

The applicant/complainant most respectfully

submits as under:

1. That the above noted case is pending before

this Hon’ble court and the same is fixed

for today.

2. That the complainant filed the present

complaint against the accused person of

their last known address to the knowledge

of the complainant. The Hon’ble Court

summoned the accused persons and some of

the accused persons appeared before this

Hon’ble Court.

3. That vide order dt. 05.09.2014, the Hon’ble

Court of Ms. Ankita Sharma returned the

 complaint to the complainant for filing

before the proper court in view of the law

laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court

(Dashrath Roop Singh Rathor v/s State of

Maharashtra). But after the amendment in

the Negotiable Instrument Act, the present

complaint again returned to the Hon’ble

Court for proper adjudication.

4. That in the above noted complaint the

accused person served on the address

mentioned in the complaint by the

complainant and some of the accused persons

appeared before the Hon’ble Court, but now

the accused no. 1 to 3 with the purpose to

harass the applicant/complainant and with

malafide intention did not appear before

this Hon’ble Court and avoiding the court

proceeding.

It is therefore prayed that necessary

action may kindly be taken against the

 accused no. 1 to 3 to secure the presence

of the accused before the Hon’ble Court in

the interest of justice.

Date: Applicant/Complainant

M/s Ganga Jamuna

through its
authorized
representative

Through Counsel: