Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Duties
No-Rights
Liabilities
Disabilities
About Hohfeld’s Analysis of Legal Rights
Professor Hohfeld has proposed that the different meanings of the term
right are often expressed in a single sentence. This uncertainty in the
language indicates a lack of precision in thought and the conclusions that
are derived in turn. His broke the meaning of rights into eight unique
concepts. These terms are defined with respect to one another to
eliminate the presence of any ambiguity. The four pairs of opposites and
correlatives exist as mentioned below.
Each and every right has a corresponding duty. When a right is invaded, a
duty is violated. This implies that if A enjoys a right against B, then B is
duty bound to respect this right.
‘Rights in rem’ and ‘Rights in personam’– Both these terms have been
derived from civil law. A ‘right in rem’ is a right that exists against the entire
world whereas a ‘right in personam’ is against a specific individual. ‘Rights
in rem’ are considered as negative rights whereas ‘rights in personam’ are
usually positive in nature.
Proprietary and Personal rights– The former is concerned with value while
the latter is not. Value, in the case of proprietary rights, is derived from
estate, property etc and personal rights are associated with status,
reputation.
Liberty does not mean interference with others like liberty to free speech
on public affairs does not grant a person the right to publish defamation.
Likewise one has the liberty to self-defense against violence but no right is
conferred to engage in revenge against the person who inflicted the injury.
Another example in this context is that when an alien who has no duty not
to enter a foreign country i.e. he has liberty to enter. The authorities have a
no-right against him i.e. they may not have any right in the strict sense
though they may still possess a liberty to refrain him from entering. [i]
Powers and rights in the strict sense are different because in the latter
case, a corresponding duty always exists which is absent in the former
case. Example- right to create a will does not result in a corresponding
obligation for someone else.
Liability is not concerned with the fruitful or unfruitful result in any given
case. For instance, a person committing a tort is duty bound to pay
compensation and is liable for an action to be brought against him/her as
well. However, someone who is not a tortfeasor is not under any duty to
pay compensation but is equally liable for an action to be instituted, that in
all probability will fail, as no grounds exist.
References
[i] https://www.ukessays.com/essays/philosophy/the-hohfeldian-analysis-
of-rights-philosophy-essay.php
[ii] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesley_Newcomb_Hohfeld
[iii] http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MurUEJL/2005/9.html
Are you tired of missing out on internship, job opportunities and law
notes?
Well, fear no more! With 45,000+ students already on board, you don't want
to be left behind. Be a part of the coolest legal community around!
Join our WhatsApp Groups (Click Here) and Telegram Channel (Click
Here) and get instant notifications.
Classification of Statutes
Case Briefs
CRPC Notes
Jurisprudence Notes
Add Comment *
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Post Comment
About LawBhoomi
Contact Info
Advertise with Us