Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hirschmuller 2008 Sigmund Freud and The History of Anna o Reopening A Closed Case by Richard A Skues (Basingstoke and
Hirschmuller 2008 Sigmund Freud and The History of Anna o Reopening A Closed Case by Richard A Skues (Basingstoke and
among other things, this was a result of the hypnotic elements in the therapy,
and that only fully developed analytical theory and the technique of free
association could have resulted in a better outcome, their opponents, on the
other hand, argue that at the very outset of psychoanalysis one can already
see its theoretical untenability and the dishonesty of its practitioners who
have omitted or falsifed essential facts about the treatment.
Richard A. Skues, a social historian from London who for several years
has studied the early years of psychoanalysis from a critical standpoint,
has now brought out a book claiming to re-open the ‘closed case’. Since
Skues had partially followed the speculations of Swales or Israels in his
previous publications, one had reason to be curious how he would present
the case of Anna O. The result is surprising: Skues’s book is a meticulous
stock-taking of what can be historically verified, of the development of the
established facts, of the contributions of the important authors and their
respective internal integrity and tendentiousness. Skues painstakingly and
methodically tracks the secondary literature in English, German and French
down to the latest publications, and some more peripheral ones have also
not escaped him (however, he does not take into account the wealth of
literature now emerging on the later life of Bertha Pappenheim, nor a
recent, well-written biography by Brentzel2 ).
It is to his credit that Skues subjects the arguments of the various authors
to meticulous critical analysis and reveals their weaknesses. He manages
clearly to unravel how the idea that Breuer’s treatments ended in failure
was used by both camps, on the one side as a proof of the inadequacy
of pre-analytical methods of treatment, and on the other to discredit
psychoanalysis itself.
Skues has rendered us the service of taking the historical documentation
seriously and of approaching the matter without prejudice. That is more
than many other authors have done. In addition his meticulous chronology
in the appendix is useful. Skues comes to the conclusion that in the
published case history Breuer did not promise more than he actually
achieved. He does not consider the surviving symptoms (trigeminal
neuralgia and addiction to medication as well as occasional hypnoid
states and inability to speak German) to be directly connected to the
hysteria itself, and consequently to have been justifiably omitted from the
publication. He has no new facts to adduce; however, he leaves it explicitly
open whether judgement of the case may not change in future, should new
documents come to light.
DOI: 10.3366/E146082350800007X