Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Auditors should take materiality into account when considering the nature,
timing and extent of audit procedures.
Materiality should be taken into account at the planning stage and consider if
the outcome of tests, enquiries or examination differ from expectation.
Like the ISA 320, the companies Act provides that materiality is a matter of
professional judgment and it has both quantitative and qualitative
dimensions
Figures can be material purely because of its size relative to another in the
accounts
Auditors often set more form of percentage value on errors which will decide
if they are material or not. This can be for instance:
5 to 10% of tax before tax
1% of total turnover
5% of net assets
However, this should not be taken as being prescriptive- the actual amount
decided on will be a matter of professional judgment.
Compare the magnitude of the item with the magnitude of the same item in
the previous year
Compare the magnitude of the item with the total of which it form a part(e.g.
debtors may include employees loans but if employees loans become
larger, that is material, then the description ‘debtors’ may be inadequate.
Despite its financial value, materiality can be estimated qualitatively. These relates
to the nature of the error or misstatement detected.
The following are examples of errors which are material by virtue of their nature :
An item which is misstated in the accounts e.g.. Short term loan classified as
long-term loan
An item which might affect the accounts but which has been omitted because
it cannot be quantified with reasonable degree of certainty e.g. outcome of the
court case.
In these cases auditors should remind the directors of their duties to comply
with the companies act and the accounting standards and rectify omission
or misstatement.
In order to gather audit evidence auditors need to carry out audit test on
transactions and balances.
Compliance tests
Substantive test
3. The letter of weakness sent to management that asks for the identification
areas of weakness
They also review the minutes of the directors meetings and enquiries
For example:
Of a transaction – the sale of a piece of plant will require the auditors to
examine the copy, authorization, price, entry in the fixed asset register
etc
Valuation and location Appropriate value of assets, liability and capital are
included in the financial statement
Occurrence, rights and All disclosure events, and transactions occurred and
obligations are of the company
This can result in auditors’ liability which may damage the audit
firm’s reputation and payment of compensation for negligence.
Audit risk is the risk auditors have to asses, business risks are overall
of risks faced by business or organization in carrying its day to day
activities
AR = IR x CR x DR
Where:
AR= The risk that auditor will draw an invalid conclusion (The allowable
audit risk that a material misstatement might remain undetected for the
account balance and related assertions).
IR = Inherent risk
CR = Control risk
DR = Detection risk
Dr. Mwiga Wiljonsi Mbesi 20
Inherent risk (IR)
IR is the risk which is derived from the nature of entity itself, its business
and its environment, or at the transaction level in the susceptibility of
the transactions to possible misstatement due to their nature or
complexity.
CR is the risk that the clients’ internal control procedures will fail to
prevent and detect material errors or misstatement.
CR is influenced by:
The attitude of the directors and management towards internal control
(internal control environment)
Additional locations
New products
DR is the risk that the auditor’ own procedures and review of financial statements
will not detect material errors or misstatements (Detection risk, the risk that
the auditors’ procedures will fail to detect a material misstatement if it exists.
The auditor will make primary assessment of the levels of inherent and
control risk
Generally, auditors aims to have not more that 5% risk that the
financial statements are materially incorrect. That means that auditors
should have a confidence level of 95% certain that their opinion is the
correct one