Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 试一下1

    Uploaded by

    zhanghui9929
    6 views3 pages
    This document contains the results of statistical analyses comparing multiple groups. It shows that the "Influence" group had significantly lower scores than the "Organizational" group on post-attitude and post-injury measures. Additionally, the "Peers" group had significantly lower scores than the "Organizational" group on all three post-measures: attitude, description ability, and injury. A separate analysis found all group pairs to be statistically significantly different from each other. Parameter estimates from a logistic regression model predicting food choice found some group assignments to be significant predictors.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains the results of statistical analyses comparing multiple groups. It shows that the "Influence" group had significantly lower scores than the "Organizational" group on post-attitude and post-injury measures. Additionally, the "Peers" group had significantly lower scores than the "Organizational" group on all three post-measures: attitude, description ability, and injury. A separate analysis found all group pairs to be statistically significantly different from each other. Parameter estimates from a logistic regression model predicting food choice found some group assignments to be significant predictors.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views3 pages

    试一下1

    Uploaded by

    zhanghui9929
    This document contains the results of statistical analyses comparing multiple groups. It shows that the "Influence" group had significantly lower scores than the "Organizational" group on post-attitude and post-injury measures. Additionally, the "Peers" group had significantly lower scores than the "Organizational" group on all three post-measures: attitude, description ability, and injury. A separate analysis found all group pairs to be statistically significantly different from each other. Parameter estimates from a logistic regression model predicting food choice found some group assignments to be significant predictors.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    Multiple Comparisons

    Dependent Variable(I) group(J) groupMean DiffStd. ErroSig.

    post_attiTamhane InfluenceOrganizat-5,965* 1,920 ,008


    InfluencePeers -4,911* 1,651 ,012
    post_descTamhane InfluenceOrganizat-1,101 ,715 ,337
    InfluencePeers -6,458* ,639 <,001
    post_injuTamhane InfluenceOrganizat-1,424* ,542 ,031
    InfluencePeers -1,603* ,402 <,001
    * The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

    Pairwise Comparisons of group


    Sample 1-Test StatStd. ErroStd. TestSig. Adj. Sig.a
    Influence -34,986 7,705 -4,541 <,001 ,000
    Influence -76,949 7,962 -9,664 <,001 ,000
    Peers-Org 41,963 8,087 5,189 <,001 ,000
    Each row tests the null hypothesis that the Sample 1 and Sample 2 distributions are the same.
    Asymptotic significances (2-sided tests) are displayed. The significance level is ,050.
    a Significance values have been adjusted by the Bonferroni correction for multiple tests.

    Parameter Estimates
    choicea B Std. ErroWald df Sig. 95%Exp(B)
    Confidence Interval for Exp(B)
    Lower Bound
    Upper Bound
    chocolateIntercept -1,652 2,581 ,410 1 ,522
    food_lite,006 ,027 ,051 1 ,822 1,006 ,955 1,060
    core_inta,113 ,068 2,747 1 ,097 1,120 ,979 1,281
    [group=1] -1,770 ,810 4,778 1 ,029 ,170 ,035 ,833
    [group=2] -2,433 1,145 4,517 1 ,034 ,088 ,009 ,828
    [group=3]0b . . 0. . . .
    water Intercept,736 2,619 ,079 1 ,779
    food_lite-,010 ,029 ,120 1 ,729 ,990 ,935 1,048
    core_inta,027 ,073 ,134 1 ,714 1,027 ,890 1,186
    [group=1] -22,919 ,000 . 1. 1.11E-07 1.11E-07 1.11E-07
    [group=2]-,592 1,133 ,273 1 ,602 ,553 ,060 5,099
    [group=3]0b . . 0. . . .
    banana Intercept -1,092 2,314 ,223 1 ,637
    food_lite,007 ,024 ,076 1 ,782 1,007 ,961 1,055
    core_inta,084 ,060 1,954 1 ,162 1,087 ,967 1,222
    [group=1]-,949 ,727 1,704 1 ,192 ,387 ,093 1,610
    [group=2] -1,767 1,033 2,926 1 ,087 ,171 ,023 1,294
    [group=3]0b . . 0. . . .
    a The reference category is: cola.
    b This parameter is set to zero because it is redundant.
    s are the same.

    iple tests.

    rval for Exp(B)


    Upper Bound

    You might also like