GET DATA

/TYPE=TXT
/FILE="C:\Users\mary_\OneDrive\Desktop\New folder\Male.csv"
/DELCASE=LINE
/DELIMITERS=" ,"
/QUALIFIER='"'
/ARRANGEMENT=DELIMITED
/FIRSTCASE=2
/IMPORTCASE=ALL
/VARIABLES=
X F3.0
nr F3.0
year F4.0
school A9
exper A9
union A3
ethn A5
maried A3
health A3
wage F12.10
industry A32
occupation A35
residence A15.
CACHE.
EXECUTE.
DATASET NAME DataSet1 WINDOW=FRONT.
NOMREG union (BASE=LAST ORDER=ASCENDING) BY school exper
/CRITERIA CIN(95) DELTA(0) MXITER(100) MXSTEP(5) CHKSEP(20) LCONVERGE(0) PC
ONVERGE(0.000001) SINGULAR(0.00000001)
/MODEL
/STEPWISE=PIN(.05) POUT(0.1) MINEFFECT(0) RULE(SINGLE) ENTRYMETHOD(LR) REMO
VALMETHOD(LR)
/INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
/PRINT=PARAMETER SUMMARY LRT CPS STEP MFI.

Nominal Regression
[DataSet1]

Page 1
 Warnings

Unexpected singularities in the Hessian matrix are

encountered. This indicates that either some predictor variables
should be excluded or some categories should be merged.

The NOMREG procedure continues despite the above warning

(s). Subsequent results shown are based on the last iteration.
Validity of the model fit is uncertain.

Case Processing Summary

Marginal
N Percentage
union no 3296 75.6%
yes 1064 24.4%
school Facultate 608 13.9%
Gimnazial 216 5.0%
Liceal 3528 80.9%
Primar 8 0.2%
exper Avansat 1044 23.9%
Expert 51 1.2%
Incepator 701 16.1%
Mediu 2562 58.8%
NA 2 0.0%
Valid 4360 100.0%
Missing 0
Total 4360
Subpopulation 15a

a. The dependent variable has only one value observed in 5 (33.3%) subpopulations.

Model Fitting Information

Model Fitting
Criteria Likelihood Ratio Tests
-2 Log
Model Likelihood Chi-Square df Sig.
Intercept Only 142.983
Final 59.760 83.223 7 .000

Pseudo R-Square

Cox and Snell .019

Nagelkerke .028
McFadden .017

Page 2
 Likelihood Ratio Tests

Model Fitting
Criteria Likelihood Ratio Tests
-2 Log
Likelihood of
Reduced
Effect Model Chi-Square df Sig.
a
Intercept 59.760 .000 0 .
school 122.087 62.328 3 .000
exper 69.730 9.970 4 .041

The chi-square statistic is the difference in -2 log-likelihoods

between the final model and a reduced model. The reduced
model is formed by omitting an effect from the final model.
The null hypothesis is that all parameters of that effect are 0.
a. This reduced model is equivalent to the final model because omitting the effect does not increase the
degrees of freedom.

Parameter Estimates

union a B Std. Error Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

no Intercept 25.356 308.158 .007 1 .934
[school=Facultate] -11.358 308.158 .001 1 .971 1.167E-005
[school=Gimnazial] -11.233 308.158 .001 1 .971 1.323E-005
[school=Liceal] -12.115 308.158 .002 1 .969 5.474E-006
[school=Primar] 0b . . 0 . .
[exper=Avansat] -12.343 .086 20780.905 1 .000 4.360E-006
[exper=Expert] -11.276 .622 328.658 1 .000 1.267E-005
[exper=Incepator] -12.064 .104 13363.186 1 .000 5.765E-006
[exper=Mediu] -12.247 .000 . 1 . 4.800E-006
b
[exper=NA] 0 . . 0 . .

Page 3
 Parameter Estimates

95% Confidence Interval for Exp

(B)
union a Lower Bound Upper Bound
no Intercept
[school=Facultate] 5.785E-268 2.356E+257
[school=Gimnazial] 6.554E-268 2.669E+257
[school=Liceal] 2.713E-268 1.105E+257
[school=Primar] . .
[exper=Avansat] 3.686E-006 5.156E-006
[exper=Expert] 3.744E-006 4.288E-005
[exper=Incepator] 4.698E-006 7.073E-006
[exper=Mediu] 4.800E-006 4.800E-006
[exper=NA] . .

a. The reference category is: yes.

b. This parameter is set to zero because it is redundant.

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=union BY school
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/CELLS=COUNT
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs
[DataSet1]

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
union * school 4360 100.0% 0 0.0% 4360 100.0%

union * school Crosstabulation

Count
school
Facultate Gimnazial Liceal Primar Total
union no 521 189 2578 8 3296
yes 87 27 950 0 1064
Total 608 216 3528 8 4360

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=school BY union
Page 4
 /FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/CELLS=COUNT
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs
[DataSet1]

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
school * union 4360 100.0% 0 0.0% 4360 100.0%

school * union Crosstabulation

Count
union
no yes Total
school Facultate 521 87 608
Gimnazial 189 27 216
Liceal 2578 950 3528
Primar 8 0 8
Total 3296 1064 4360

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=school BY union
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/CELLS=COUNT ROW COLUMN TOTAL
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs
[DataSet1]

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
school * union 4360 100.0% 0 0.0% 4360 100.0%

Page 5
 school * union Crosstabulation

union
no yes Total
school Facultate Count 521 87 608
% within school 85.7% 14.3% 100.0%
% within union 15.8% 8.2% 13.9%
% of Total 11.9% 2.0% 13.9%
Gimnazial Count 189 27 216
% within school 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%
% within union 5.7% 2.5% 5.0%
% of Total 4.3% 0.6% 5.0%
Liceal Count 2578 950 3528
% within school 73.1% 26.9% 100.0%
% within union 78.2% 89.3% 80.9%
% of Total 59.1% 21.8% 80.9%
Primar Count 8 0 8
% within school 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within union 0.2% 0.0% 0.2%
% of Total 0.2% 0.0% 0.2%
Total Count 3296 1064 4360
% within school 75.6% 24.4% 100.0%
% within union 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 75.6% 24.4% 100.0%

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=union BY school
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/CELLS=COUNT ROW COLUMN TOTAL
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs
[DataSet1]

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
union * school 4360 100.0% 0 0.0% 4360 100.0%

Page 6
 union * school Crosstabulation

school
Facultate Gimnazial Liceal Primar Total
union no Count 521 189 2578 8 3296
% within union 15.8% 5.7% 78.2% 0.2% 100.0%
% within school 85.7% 87.5% 73.1% 100.0% 75.6%
% of Total 11.9% 4.3% 59.1% 0.2% 75.6%
yes Count 87 27 950 0 1064
% within union 8.2% 2.5% 89.3% 0.0% 100.0%
% within school 14.3% 12.5% 26.9% 0.0% 24.4%
% of Total 2.0% 0.6% 21.8% 0.0% 24.4%
Total Count 608 216 3528 8 4360
% within union 13.9% 5.0% 80.9% 0.2% 100.0%
% within school 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 13.9% 5.0% 80.9% 0.2% 100.0%

Page 7