Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COMPILATION OF
DAILY CLASS NOTES
MODERN HISTORY
Topic
Lecture – 1 Introduction & Fragmented Polity
Lecture – 2 Fragmented Polity II
Lecture – 3 Marathas and the Advent of the Europeans
Lecture – 4 Advent of the Europeans – II
Lecture – 5 Rise of East India Company
Lecture – 6 Rise of East India Company – II
Lecture – 7 Rise of East India Company III
Lecture – 8 Rise of East India Company - Governor Generals
Lecture – 9 Rise of EIC – Diplomacy
Lecture – 10 Various Acts till 1858
Lecture – 11 Various Acts and British Policies
Lecture – 12 British Economic Policy
Lecture – 13 British Policies II
Lecture – 14 British Policies – Education
Lecture – 15 British Policies – Education II
Lecture – 16 Revolts Before 1857
Lecture – 17 Revolt before 1857 – II
Lecture – 18 Tribal Revolts
Lecture – 33 Extremists Era III – Home Rule and Government of India Act 1919
Lecture – 38 Revolutionary
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture - 01
Introduction & Fragmented
Polity
2
Shahjahan (1628-1658): Succeeded Jahangir and ascended the throne in 1628. He was a great patroniser of
architecture, he built the Taj Mahal; Moti Masjid; Sheesh Mahal and Mussamman Burj at Agra; Red Fort with
its Rang Mahal, Diwan-i-Am and Diwan-i-Khas at Delhi; Jama Masjid in Delhi (red stone); etc. This led to
the huge expense in the Mughal treasury.
Aurangzeb (1658-1707): Shah Jahan’s zeal for construction had depleted the treasury. Aurangzeb’s long wars
in the south had further drained the exchequer. Aurangzeb expanded his empire to a large extent of the Indian
sub-continent; thus his reigning period was also called a ‘territorial climax’.
Aurangzeb had to face multiple other issues, regional groups and rebels like Jats, Marathas and Sikhs;
multiple wars; Jagirdari crisis; Aurangzeb’s bigoted religious policy further exacerbated the situation; etc.
In 1707, Aurangzeb died.
Shifting Allegiance of zamindars: Zamindars were the hereditary owners of their lands. They helped in the
collection of revenue and in local administrations for which they also maintained soldiers. During the reign of
Aurangzeb, there was a marked increase in the power of zamindars. The ‘Regional loyalties’ were encouraged
and many Zamindars helped Nobles to take advantage of the weakness of the empire and carve independent
territories for themselves.
Jagirdari Crisis: The nobles (Jagirdars/Mansabdars) during the Mughals were granted large Jagirs (lands).
By the end of Aurangzeb’s rule, the number of Jagirdars/Mansabdars increased significantly but the land was
limited. So, the Mughals had to carve out their own land to pacify the Jagirdars.
Conflict among Nobles: Nobles in the Mughal empire were divided on the line of Religion, Homeland and
Tribe. The mutual rivalry among Mughals increased and the weak Emperor failed to put a check on this.
Rise of Regional aspiration: Right from the time of Aurangzeb regional groups like Jats, Marathas and Sikhs
started defying the authority of the Mughal emperor with the aspiration of creating their own Independent
Kingdom. They did not succeed in their effort but this drew the Mughals into continuous warfare causing the
weakening of the empire.
Failure of the Mughal economy: Shah Jahan’s zeal for construction had depleted the treasury. Aurangzeb’s
long wars in the south had further drained the exchequer. Frequent wars, the luxurious lifestyle of the emperor
and amirs, and the reduction in Khalisa land (under the direct control of the emperor), all of this resulted in
expenditure which was much higher than income. All this made the empire Economically unstable.
Rise of independent states: The Great Mughals were efficient and exercised control over ministers and the
army, but the later Mughals were poor administrators. As a result, the distant provinces became independent.
The rise of independent states like Bengal, Oudh, Hyderabad, etc. ultimately led to the disintegration of the
Mughal Empire.
External Invasions: The invasions of Nadir Shah and Ahmad Shah Abdali resulted in huge loss of wealth.
Lack of Scientific Progresses: Almost no technological advancement fueled the stagnancy of the empire. Due
to this Mughal Military became obsolete and its administration inefficient.
5
Later Mughals:
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture - 02
Fragmented Polity II
2
Fragmented Polity II
Later Mughals:
During the first half of the Eighteenth century, the Mughal Empire showed signs of dissolution. The successors
of Aurangzeb were weak and dissolute and were at the mercy of their intriguing ministers.
After the death of Aurangzeb in 1707, a war of succession began amongst his three surviving sons.
Muazzam was the governor of Kabul,
Azam was the governor of Gujarat, and
Kam Baksh was the governor of Deccan.
Azam turned to Ahmednagar and proclaimed himself emperor.
Kam Baksh too declared himself the sovereign ruler and conquered important places such as Gulbarga and
Hyderabad.
Muazzam defeated both:
Azam at Jajau in 1707 and
Kam Baksh near Hyderabad in 1708.
Muazzam ascended the Mughal throne with the title of Bahadur Shah I.
Bahadur Shah followed a policy of compromise and conciliation and tried to conciliate the Rajputs, the
Marathas, the Bundelas, the Jats and the Sikhs.
During his reign the Marathas and the Sikhs became more powerful.
Sikhs:
Reconciled with Guru Gobind Singh and granted him high mansab.
After the death of the Guru, the Sikhs once again raised a revolt under the leadership of Banda
Bahadur.
The Mughal authority defeated Banda Bahadur at Lohgarh, a fort built by Guru Gobind Singh. That
was however recovered in 1712 by the Sikhs.
Rajputs:
To have better control over Marwar and Amber, he forced Ajit Singh of Marwar to submit to the
Mughal authority.
He made attempts to garrison Amber and replace Jai Singh with his younger brother Vijay Singh.
Both Ajit Singh and Jai Singh were later restored but their demand for high mansabs (ranks) and
offices of subahdars of important provinces were not accepted.
Marathas:
Shahu, son of Sambhaji who was in Mughal captivity was released in 1707.
He granted Sardeshmukhi of the Deccan but not the chauth.
He also did not recognize Shahu as the rightful Maratha king thus keeping the fight for supremacy
going between Tarabai and Shahu.
Marathas thus remained dissatisfied.
Bahadur Shah made peace with Chhatrasal, the Bundela chief and the Jat chief Churaman who joined him in
the campaign against Banda Bahadur.
He adopted a more tolerant attitude towards the Hindus.
There was however a deterioration in the field of administration in his reign because he lavishly granted jagirs
and promotions.
Previously, the contest for power was between the royal princes; the nobles had merely backed and sided with
them. Now they were aspirants to the throne or power.
After him, the war of succession was fought among his four sons, Jahandar Shah, Rafi-us-Shan, Azim-us-Shan
and Jahan Shah.
Jahandar Shah was a weak ruler and came to the throne chiefly – with the help of Zulfikar Khan (Irani party),
the powerful noble who made the wazir (prime minister).
4
Sayyid Brothers:
The two Sayyid brothers were Abdulla Khan and Hussain Ali Khan.
The exertions of these two brothers won Farrukh Siyar his empire.
Farrukh Siyar ascended the throne in 1713 and they actually played the part of king-makers during the period
1713-1720.
Farrukhsiyar (1713-1719):
Jahandar Shah’s position was challenged by Farrukhsiyar who with the help of the Sayyid brothers (Abdullah
Khan and Hussain Ali - Hindustani party, known as ‘King Makers’), defeated and killed Jahandar Shah.
The Sayyid brothers soon acquired dominant control over the affairs of the state. They were given the offices
of Wazir and Mir Bakshi respectively.
5
Farrukh Siyar's reign saw the execution of Sikh leader Banda Bahadur.
Supported by Sayyid Brothers:
Abdulla khan-Wazir
Hussain Ali khan- Mir Bakshi
He followed a policy of religious tolerance by abolishing Jaziya and Pilgrimage tax.
The English East India Company was granted trading privileges including exemption of custom duties for its
trade through Bengal.
Farman:
Permission was granted to purchase 38 villages surrounding the three already held by the company
(Sutanuti, Gobindapur and Kalikata, the predecessor of modern Calcutta).
The Company was also granted trading privileges in Bengal and further fortification of Calcutta.
This grant was instrumental in the setting up of business and the colonisation of Bengal, later to be followed
by the rest of India, by the East India Company.
Killed by Sayyid brothers with the help of Marathas (Peshwa Balaji Vishwanath).
It was the first time in the history of Mughals that an emperor was killed by his nobles.
The hostile nobles united themselves under the leadership of Nizam-ul-Mulk (Turani Party) of the Deccan.
Further the murder of Farrukh Siyar created a wave of terror and repulsion against the Sayyid brothers who
were looked down upon as traitors.
They were branded as anti-Islamic for their policies.
The anti-Sayyid nobles were strongly backed by Muhammad Shah who wanted to free him-self from the hold
of the brothers and they were helped by Nizam ul Mulk.
In 1720, Hussain Ali was killed by the rebellious nobles and Abdullah Khan died in 1722 after he was defeated
at Agra. This ended the rule of the Sayyid brothers in the Mughal Empire.
After the fall of the Sayyid brothers Muhammad Shah had a long reign (1719 - 48) to save the empire. Mughal
rule was still held in high esteem by the people.
The Mughal army, especially the artillery, was still the most important force; administration in northern India
had deteriorated but not collapsed entirely. The Maratha sardars were still confined to the south and the
Rajput’s were loyal to the Mughals.
He was the most pleasure-loving ruler of loose morals and is therefore called Muhammad Shah ‘Rangila’.
He was not a good ruler.
His first Wazir after the fall of the Sayyid brothers was Muhammad Amin Khan. After his death Nizam-
ul-Mulk was appointed the wazir in 1722.
But instead of supporting Nizam, the emperor suspected his own ministers.
The attempts to reform the administration proved futile and disgusted with the inability and fickle mindedness
of the emperor the Nizam chose to pursue his own ambitions. He gave up his office in 1724 and proceeded to
the south and founded the state of Hyderabad.
Saadat Khan carved out a state of Oudh. Murshid Quli Khan became virtually independent in Bengal, Bihar,
and Orissa.
Baji Rao - I raided Delhi in March 1737 with a small army of just 500 horsemen.
The already declining Mughal Empire received another fatal blow when the Persian monarch, Nadir Shah
invaded India in 1739 (Battle of Karnal).
7
His successor Ahmad Shah born of Udham Bai, a public dancing girl, ascended the throne but was unable to
cope with the disintegrating forces. He left the affairs of state in the hands of Udham Bai.
Udham Bai given the title of Qibla-i-Alam was a lady of poor intellect who ruled with the help of her paramour,
Javid Khan (a notorious eunuch).
The weak defences of the northwest encouraged Ahmad Shah Abdali:
He invaded India twice in 1749 and 1752, when he marched up to Delhi.
The emperor, with a view to buy peace and save Delhi from devastation, ceded Punjab and Multan to
Abdali.
Imad-ul-Mulk ousted the Wazir Safdar Jang and became the wazir. Ahmad Shah was blinded and deposed by
this new wazir.
Alamgir II (1754-1759):
After the removal of Ahmad Shah, Imad-ul-Mulk raised Azizuddin, Jahandar Shah’s son on the throne who
styled himself after Aurangzeb as Alamgir II.
The military and financial position of the empire during this period became worse to the extent that the
emperor’s household troops carried off the articles from the houses of the wazirs and nobles and sold them
into the market.
Ahmad Shah Abdali invaded Delhi in 1757 and the imperial city was plundered.
The relations between Alamgir II and Wazir Imad-ul-Mulk were not satisfactory and the latter got him
murdered in 1759.
During his reign the Battle of Plassey was fought in 1757.
He was also known as a fugitive Mughal emperor for not entering Delhi for 12 years. In these years Najib-ud-
daulah and Rohilla leaders had held over Delhi.
In 1764 he allied with Mir Qasim of Bengal and Shuja-ud-daulah of Awadh in the Battle of Buxar.
He was defeated in battle and signed the Treaty of Allahabad (1765) under which he gave diwani rights of
Bengal, Odisha and Bihar to Britishers. Alam got districts of Kora and Allahabad.
In 1771 Marathas returned to Delhi and Shah Alam ll ruled under Maratha suzerainty.
In 1772, Marathas took him to Delhi, where he stayed till 1803. He had a battle with Rohilla leaders supported
by Marathas.
In 1803, the British captured Delhi and the Mughal emperor became the pensioners of the English.
Akbar II (1806-1837):
He was told to give away his titles.
He gave the title of “Raja” to Ram Mohan Roy.
He asked for increment in pension
In 1835, the coins bearing the names of Mughal emperors were stopped.
Rise of Marathas:
Sambhaji:
He was the elder son of Shivaji. He defeated his brother Rajaram.
He supported Akbar II, the rebellious son of Aurangzeb.
In 1681 Aurangzeb reached Deccan in pursuit of his son Akbar II
In 1686 the annexation of Bijapur took place.
In 1687 the annexation of Golkonda took place.
In 1689, Sambhaji was captured and executed which unleashed Maratha sardars.
Rajaram:
He succeeded the throne with the help of the minister.
He also fled to the east coast (Jinji).
The Mughal captured Rajgarh along with Sambhaji's wife and son Shahu but Rajaram escaped.
In 1703, Aurangzeb opened negotiations but then retreated.
11
Shahu (1707-1749):
He was released by the Mughal emperor Bahadur shah which led to the start of civil war.
He defeated Tarabai’s army.
In his reign the rise of Peshwas and transformation of the Maratha kingdom into an empire based on the
principle of confederacy was evident.
Revenue System:
The revenue administration was based on Mughal & Deccani states.
Land was measured by the rod called lathi and classified as:
1. Paddy fields
2. Garden lands and
3. Hilly tracts
Shivaji reduced the powers of Deshmukh and Kulkarni.
Shivaji appointed his revenue officials called Karkuns.
Shivaji also discouraged revenue farming.
Chauth and Sardheshmukhi were two major sources of revenue and were collected in neighbouring areas of
Mughal/Deccan sultans.
Chauth: ¼ of the revenue paid to Mughals in order to avoid Maratha raids.
Sardeshmukhi: Additional levy of 10% on the lands where Marathas claim hereditary rights.
12
Peshwas:
Pant Pradhan who handles finance and general administration out of Ashta Pradhans.
Later, they became more important and functioned as Prime Minister.
They focused on intelligence and a centralised intelligence department was created.
Ashta Pradhan:
Ashta Pradhan was a system of ministerial delegation in the Maratha empire.
The council is credited with having implemented good governance practices in the Maratha heartland, as
well as for the success of the military campaigns against the Mughal Empire.
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 03
Marathas and the Advent of
the Europeans
2
Bajirao (1720-40):
He was the eldest son of Balaji Vishwanath.
He was called “Thorale” meaning elder Bajirao.
He was a great exponent of Guerrilla tactics after Shivaji.
He was known as the most influential of the nine Peshwas.
He formulated the policy of Northward expansion so that Maratha could rein from Attock to Cuttack.
He is said to have fought for the establishment of "Hindu Pad Padshahi" (Hindu Empire).
Nizam-ul-Mulk was the arch rival and conspired against him with the house of Kolhapur. Nizam got defeated
at Palkhed and Bhopal and had to grant Chauth and Sardeshmukhi of 6 provinces of Deccan.
In 1722, he captured Salsette and Bassein from the Portuguese.
In 1728, he shifted administrative capital from Satara to Pune.
He initiated the system of confederacy among the Maratha chiefs which they were supposed to administer
autonomously.
3
He helped conquer Central India (Malwa) and Rajputana and extended his dominions into Gujarat in the
northwest and Deccan in the south.
He raided Mughal Delhi in 1737. He fought in over 41 battles and is one of the few to have never lost a
single battle.
He died at the age of 40 of sudden fever in camp while going to Delhi.
In order to manage the rapidly increasing empire, Baji Rao I organised a confederacy of prominent Maratha
chiefs. Each Chief was assigned a sphere of influence which he was supposed to conquer and rule in the name
of Maratha King Shahu.
Rulers Areas ruled State
Bhonsle Thanjavur State Tamil Nadu
Ghorpade Mudhol State Karnataka
Gaekwad Baroda State Gujarat
Newalkar Jhansi State Uttar Pradesh
Holkars Indore State Madhya Pradesh
Puars (or Pawars) Dewas State Madhya Pradesh
Dhar State Madhya Pradesh
Chhatarpur State Madhya Pradesh
Scindia Gwalior State Madhya Pradesh
Balaji Bajirao (1740-61):
He was also known as Nanasaheb Peshwa.
He extended the Maratha territories into most of North-West, East and Central India.
In 1749, Shahuji died without an issue, however, Tarabai had introduced Ramraja as the grandson of
Rajaram (later found to be imposter)
In 1750, by the Sangola Agreement of 1750, the Maratha King became a roi faineant (do-nothing king) and
the Mayor of the palace and the Peshwa emerged as the
real and effective head of the Maratha Confederacy.
(Ramraja was retained as titular Chatrapati)
It was under his leadership that the Maratha Empire
reached its peak.
He defeated Alivardi Khan - Nawab of Bengal and 1/3rd of
the Indian subcontinent came under the Marathas.
In 1752, he entered into an Agreement with the Mughals
and gave assurance to protect the Mughal empire from
internal and external enemies for which Chauth of North
West provinces and the total revenue of Agra and Ajmer
would be collected by Marathas.
In 1758, he captured Attock (on the banks of the Indus River)
and Peshawar in the Battle of Attock.
4
Narayan-Rao (1772-73):
He was assassinated on Raghunath Rao’s order.
Raghunath Rao (1773 – 1774):
He was responsible for extending the Maratha empire to the zenith in the North as a General yet he saw
the decline of Maratha power in North India.
He seized the throne but was not recognised and later overthrown.
He was deposed by Nana Phadnis.
He went to the British for help in the First Anglo-Maratha War (1775 – 82).
In the Battle of Talegaon (1776), Nana Phadnavis defeated the British leading to the signing of the
Treaty of Purandar, 1776 and the Treaty of Salbai, 1782.
This restored the status quo but the English retained Salsette and dropped the cause of Raghunath Rao.
Sawai Madhav Rao (1774 – 1795):
He was the son of Narayan Rao and was crowned when he was just 40 days old.
His empire was managed by Nana Phadnavis with a 12-member regency council called Barabhai Council.
Baji Rao II (1796 - 1818):
He was the son of Raghunath Rao and the last Peshwa.
He was the weakest and most incompetent Peshwa.
In 1802, he signed the Treaty of Bassein with the British which gave them effective control over the
Maratha region, Deccan and Western India.
In 1818, in the Third Anglo-Maratha War, he was defeated by the British and pensioned.
The territories of Peshwa were annexed.
His adopted son was Nana Sahib.
Decline of the Maratha Power:
The Successors of Shivaji were very weak and inefficient. Real power passed into the hands of the Peshwa.
Under Sahu, the office of the Peshwa also became hereditary.
Though the first two Peshwas were
empire-builders, the Maratha power
received a staggering blow at the Third
Battle of Panipat in 1761. Marathas lost
the cream of their army and their
political prestige suffered.
Most of all, their defeat gave an
opportunity to the English East India
Company to consolidate their power in
Bengal and South India.
In the absence of a settled system, the
state descended into a terrible engine
of oppression. Unfortunately, most of the eminent leaders died towards the end of the eighteenth century.
6
Important Concepts:
Capitalism:
It is an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private
owners for profit, rather than by the state.
It is a system based on profit making.
The capital accumulates and looks for new venues of investment.
Mercantilism (17th Century):
It is an economic system of trade that spanned from the 16th century to the 18th century.
Mercantilism is based on the principle that the world's wealth was static, and consequently, many European
nations attempted to accumulate the largest possible share of that wealth by maximising their exports and
by limiting their imports via tariffs (protectionism).
Gold and silver were the most desirable that could be accessed from trade.
It was based on the acquisition of colonies, through the market, which eventually became a supplier of raw
materials.
The situation was, thus, prepared for Portugal's intrusion towards India.
In 1498, the first Portugal Ship arrived in India. It was led by Vasco de Gama.
Important Explorations:
Christopher Columbus Vasco da Gama
He was from Spain. He was from Portugal.
He found America instead of India in 1492. He found India through the Cape of Good Hope and
reached Calicut in 1498.
Portuguese:
Before the advent of the Portuguese, the seaborne trade between India and the West was in the hands of the
Arabs.
The Portuguese not only asserted their naval superiority by overthrowing the Arabs but also conquered large
territories in India.
Vasco Da Gama (1498):
He found a sea route to India through the Cape of Good Hope.
He reached Calicut in May 1498.
He sent a couple of his men to Ponnani to meet with the ruler of Calicut, the Zamorin. Over the objections
of Arab merchants, Gama managed to secure a letter of concession for trading rights from Zamorin, Calicut's
Hindu ruler.
But the Portuguese were unable to pay the prescribed customs duties and price of his goods in gold.
Also, the Portuguese wanted to monopolize the eastern trade by expelling competitors, especially the
Arabs.
Kochi became the Head Quarter of the Portuguese Empire in India (later it was replaced by Goa).
PW Web/App: https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture - 04
Advent of the Europeans - II
2
The Blue Water Policy was the fortification of the Indian Ocean, not for the security but for the
establishment of Portuguese business in the
Indian ocean.
He wanted to build strong naval power rather than
strong fortresses as they have lesser manpower.
There was a threat from the Sultan of Egypt who
raised a fleet against them in the Red sea.
He conquered Kilwa, erected forts in Anjediva,
Cochin, Cannanore,
He refused to cede office until after the Battle of
Diu.
He died at Table Bay, on return voyage, March
1510.
He fought in the Battle of Diu and Chaul.
The great Muslim alliance was soundly defeated, easing the Portuguese strategy of controlling the Indian
Ocean to route trade down the Cape of Good Hope, circumventing the traditional spice route controlled by the
Arabs and the Venetians through the Red Sea and Persian Gulf.
Importance of Goa:
It was a crucial trading port of Arabian and Persian war-horses to India unloading exclusively at Goa.
This region was considered as the most valuable source of income due to trade and strategic importance.
Capturing Goa would help the Portuguese to control trade in the Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean.
Setting up a strong naval base at Goa gives a signal to the regional kingdom for caution.
Portuguese Administration:
The Portuguese Administration was headed by Viceroy with the help of a council.
Vedor Da Fazenda was responsible for revenue, and the cargoes and dispatch of fleets.
Portuguese Administration:
Reach of Portuguese occupation in India
➢ On the West Coast: Goa, from Mumbai to Daman & Diu to the approaches to Gujrat.
➢ In South: Mangalore, Cannanore, Cochin, calicut.
➢ In East: San Thome (In Chennai) and Nagapattinam (In Andhra), Hooghly in Bengal.
Portuguese who were the first Europeans to come to India were also the last to leave with the recapture of Goa
by the Indian Govt in 1961.
Capture of Hooghly: On the basis of an imperial farman 1579, the Portuguese had settled down on a river
bank which was a short distance from Satgaon in Bengal to carry on their trading activities.
Over the years, they strengthened their position by constructing big buildings which led to the migration
of the trade from Satgaon to the new port known as Hooghly.
Portuguese settled in Hooghly after migrating from Satgaon in Bengal.
There they monopolised the manufacture of salt, built a custom house of their own and imposed a strict
levy on tobacco which had become an important article of trade since its introduction at the beginning of
the 17th century.
The Portuguese not only made money as traders but also started a cruel slave trade by purchasing or
seizing Hindu and Muslim children, whom they brought up as Christians.
In the course of their nefarious activities, they seized two slave girls of Mumtaz Mahal.
On June 24, 1632, the siege of Hooghly began, ending in its capture three months later.
Shah Jahan ordered the Bengal Governor Qasim Khan to take action against the Portuguese.
A siege of Hooghly finally led to the Portuguese fleeing. The Mughals suffered a loss of 1,000 men, but
also took 400 prisoners to Agra. The prisoners were offered the option to convert to Islam or become
slaves. The persecution of Christians continued for some time after which it died down gradually.
Portuguese Architecture:
The Portuguese brought with them the Iberian style of architecture.
They initially built trading posts and warehouses, which were later
remodelled into fortified towns along the coastlines.
They also introduced the concept of 'Patio houses' and 'Baroque style'
developed in the late 16th century in Europe to express the strength of the
Church.
Iberian style: It refers to the art of Spain and Portugal after the Classical Age and before Romanesque art and
architecture
A patio home is a dwelling that shares at least one
wall with another home, and usually doesn't rise
higher than one and-a-half stories tall.
The Baroque style is characterised by exaggerated
motion and clear detail used to produce drama,
exuberance, and grandeur in sculpture, painting,
architecture, literature, dance, and music. It is
applied in church to express the strength of the
church.
It involved use of contrasting colours and
elaborate, detailed and theatrical design to create a dramatic effect.
8
Diu Fort:
It was built in 1535 AD on the coast of Diu Island.
The fort has a lighthouse and canons are placed on the walls.
It has three churches inside the fort complex namely: St. Thomas Church, St. Paul's Church, and Church of
St. Francis of Assisi.
He was first buried on a beach at Shangchuan Island. His body was taken from the island in February 1553
and temporarily buried in St. Paul's Church in Portuguese Malacca on 22 March 1553.
Pereira came back from Goa, removed the corpse shortly after 15 April 1553, and moved it to his house. On
11 December 1553, Xavier's body was shipped to Goa. The body is now in the Basilica of Bom Jesus in Goa.
British-Portuguese Conquest:
In 1608, the arrival of William Hawkins to the court of Jahangir and stayed in Agra till 1611 convinced him
to grant permission to open a factory on the west coast.
This permission was not liked by the governor of Gujarat and Portuguese.
In 1611 Battle of Swally (near Surat) took place between Portuguese and Britishers in which the Portuguese
lost.
Hence, the English East India Company set up its first factory in Surat in 1613 and this marked the end
of Portuguese European power.
John Seely:
“Our acquisition of India was made blindly. Nothing great that has ever been done by Englishman was done so
unintentionally and so accidentally as the conquest of India”.
British (1608-1947):
The Success of these European powers and the high profits they made inflamed the imagination of the
merchants of English. They also made attempts to participate in such profitable commerce.
In 1599, John Mildenhall, a merchant adventurer of London, came to India. He travelled to India through
Persia, reached Agra in 1603 and spoke with the Akbar.
11
In 1615, Sir Thomas Roe reached the Mughal court. Roe remained at Jahangir’s court from the end of 1615
till the end of 1618 and he succeeded in securing several privileges for the company, particularly the
permission to erect factories in many places (Agra, Ahmedabad and Baroch).
Now they got farman to establish their factories in all parts of the Mughal empire. He was able to get a royal
order “Farman” to local authorities sanctioning English Trade at Surat at reasonable terms.
With this Farman, the English Factory got legal authority and a permanent basis. A branch factory at
Masulipatnam was established after a few days.
Conditions in the South were more favourable to them as they did not have to face a strong Indian government
there.
They opened their first factory in the South at Masulipatnam (1611), Aramgaon (1626) , Amboyna Massacre
1623 (Indonesia).
The Britishers were thrown out of Indonesia by the Dutch and now full focus was on expansion of commercial
activities in India.
Sir Thomas Roe was successful in obtaining two farmans from the Mughal Court confirming free trade with
exemption from inland toll.
Treaty between India and England was not possible as England was too small for this.
The Amboyna massacre was the 1623 torture and execution on Ambon Island (present-day Ambon, Maluku,
Indonesia) of twenty men, including ten of whom were in the service of the English East India Company, and
Japanese and Portuguese traders, by agents of the Dutch East India Company (VOC), on accusations of
treason.
It was the result of the intense rivalry between the East India companies of England and the United Provinces
in the spice trade and remained a source of tension between the two nations until late in the 17th century.
British Vs Aurangzeb:
In 1688, English captured Hooghly and declared war with Aurangzeb but was defeated and soon came back
on humble treaties.
Aurangzeb pardoned and took compensation of 1.5 Lakh.
In 1632, Golden Farman were issued by Sultan of Golkonda allowing English to trade freely from the ports of
Golkonda with the right to trade in for a fixed customs duty.
In 1633, the English moved east and started factories at Hariharpur in Mahanadi Delta and Balasore in Orissa.
In 1639, Francis Day received permission to build a fortified factory at Madras received from the ruler of
Chandragiri.
13
It later became Fort St. George and replaced Masulipatnam as headquarters of the English settlement in south
India. It was the first territorial possession and was the first presidency. It was elevated to a Presidency, under
the leadership of the first president, Aaron Baker.
In 1690, Britishers bought the fort Devanampattinam (Madras) and renamed it Fort St. David.
In 1662, The Portuguese gave the island of Bombay to King Charles II of England as Dowry for marrying a
Portuguese Princess Catherine of Braganza. Gerald Aungier was the first governor. Bombay replaced Surat as
Headquarter in 1687.
Bengal:
In 1651, Shah Shuja, the subedar of Bengal allowed English to trade in Bengal in return of annual payment of
Rs 3000. The British established factories at Hugli in 1651 and soon after at Kasimbazar, Rajmahal and Patna.
In 1667, the English obtained the royal farman to trade in Bengal from the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb.
In 1690 there was the establishment of a factory at Sutanati by Job Charnock. Fortified at 1696 (Fort William
named in 1700).
In 1691, the Governor of Bengal gave the English Company Dastaks (Free trade passes) on the payment of a
fixed duty.
In 1698, they also got Zamindari rights for Govindpur, Kalikata and Sutanati. This region later became
Calcutta.
In 1700, the British established Fort William at Calcutta. It became the seat of eastern presidency with Sir
Charles Eyre as its first President.
In 1714, an English mission led by John Surman to the court of Mughal emperor Farrukhsiyar secured three
famous farmans in 1717 after the Emperor was cured of a painful disease by the English Surgeon William
Hamilton, giving the company many valuable privileges in Bengal, Gujrat and Hyderabad.
The farmans were regarded as the Magna Carta of the company. The Nawabs of Bengal, however, showed
scant regard for the imperial farman.
Farman by Farukhsiyar:
In 1717, Farrukhsiyar issued a farman giving the British East India Company the right to reside and trade in
the Mughal Empire.
They were allowed to trade freely, except for a yearly payment of 3,000 rupees. This was because William
Hamilton, a surgeon associated with the company cured Farrukhsiyar of a disease.
The company was given the right to issue dastak (passes) for the movement of goods. But not for company
servants who were allowed to trade though and were supposed to pay the same taxes as Indian merchants.
The farman allowed the British East-India company to carry out duty-free trade in the province of Bengal.
In Hyderabad the company retained its privileges of freedom of duties. In Madras required to pay only existing
rent.
In Surat, it was exempted from all dues for a payment of Rs 10,000.
The Company’s coins minted at Bombay were to have currency throughout the Mughal Empire.
The Company could rent more territory around Bombay.
14
Self-Study:
Danes (Denmark):
The Danish EIC was established in 1616 and in 1620 they established a factory at Tranquebar (TN) and
Tanjore (TN).
Their principal settlement was at Serampore, Calcutta.
They were better known for their missionary activities rather than commerce.
The then Danish colony include today's town of:
Tharangambadi Tamil Nadu,
Serampore West Bengal
Nicobar Islands
In 1755 founded a colony Fredericknagore (Serampore, Bengal) which was later occupied by English.
After the mid-1770s Danes became weak and bankrupt and Serampore transferred to Danish Crown.
Serampore is famous for the cultural and educational activities of missionaries.
In 1845 Denmark ceded Serampore to Britain and ended Danish presence in Bengal.
Danish Architecture:
The Danish fleet led by Ove Gjedde landed in Tranquebar (Tharangambadi) in 1620, after an almost 2
year expedition during which they sailed through England, Africa.
Initially they settled at Masulipatnam.
As Tranquebar was the Danish outpost
in India for over 200 years.
Their town planning was laid out in
squares and canals.
Some of the Danish architecture style
buildings are:
Towngate and landporten
The Danish Fort
New Jerusalem Church
15
Bartholomaus Ziegenbalg:
Bartholomaus Ziegenbalg was the first Protestant missionary to land in India, sent as a royal missionary
by King Frederick IV, from the Kingdom of Denmark.
They landed at Tranquebar 1707.
They attended the local school, sat amongst the village children, and learnt Tamil. He set up a Tamil
seminary in 1707, and preached Christianity to the villagers.
In 1711, he convinced the Martin Luther University at Halle to start scholarly study into the Tamil
language.
In 1715, translated the Bible into Tamil and helped set up India's first printing press at Tranquebar, with
Tamil being the first Indian language to be printed.
They championed the cause of women's education and for abolition of the caste system, and gained the
respect of the local people.
They established the very first school for girls in India at Tranquebar in 1707.
Between 1717 and 1718, he helped establish the New Jerusalem Church at Tranquebar for the use of the
native people, conducting services in Tamil.
Ziegenbalg died on 23 February 1719, aged 37, and is buried in the New Jerusalem Church.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 05
Rise of East India
Company
2
French (1664-1760):
The French established their 1st factory at Surat.
The French headquarters was at Pondicherry.
They develop their strong hold in South India.
They also had a cordial relation with Mysore.
3
On 21st September 1746 the city was captured and Robert Clive was taken as Prisoner of War.
La Bourdonnais was bribed and tried to ransom the city.
Dupleix recaptured Madras but could not capture Fort St. David.
The French army was led by Dupleix.
English also tried but failed to capture Pondicherry in October 1748.
Nawab Anwar-ud-din of Carnatic fought from the side of English.
A small French army defeated the large army of Nawab at St. Thome. This was an eye-opener for Europeans
as they realised that even a small disciplined army can defeat a much larger Indian army.
The fight was between Captain Paradise and Mahfuz Khan, however, the Indian army lost.
Anwar had asked the trade companies to maintain peace in the land and was told by Dupleix that Madras
would be surrendered to him after capturing. Dupleix took a U-turn.
Result: Ended with the treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle concluded in 1748 which brought the Austrian war of
succession to a conclusion. Madras was handed back to the English and French and in turn got territory in
North America.
The Second Carnatic War (1749-54):
Dupleix wanted to increase his power and French Political influence in southern India.
He interfered in local dynastic disputes to defeat English.
Immediate Cause:
Hyderabad:
The death of Nizam-ul-Mulk (1748) provided an opportunity.
The accession of Nasir Jung (Son of Nizam-ul-Mulk) to the throne of Hyderabad was opposed by
Muzaffar Jung, Grandson of Nawab.
The French supported Muzaffar Jung, the English Supported Nasir Jung.
Carnatic:
The release of Chanda Sahib (Son in law of Dost Ali).
The appointment of Anwar-ud-din as nawab resented Chanda Sahib.
The French supported Chanda Sahib & English Anwar-uddin.
The Carnatic region is the region of peninsular South India lying between the Eastern Ghats and the
Bay of Bengal in the modern Indian states of Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and southern Andhra Pradesh.
Course of the War:
The combined army of Muzaffar Jung, Chanda Sahib and the French, defeated and killed Anwar-ud-din at
the Battle of Ambur in 1749.
Muzaffar Jung became the Subedar of Deccan and granted Pondicherry and Masulipatnam to the French.
Also, surrendered some districts in Northern Circars to the French.
Dupleix became the governor of Mughal territories to the south of River Krishna.
5
Some of the family members of Kunjali Marakkar who were engaged in trade had moved to the coastal
regions of Tamil Nadu.
At Madhavan Kurichi, a small village in Thoothukkudi,
Tamil Nadu there is a Perumal temple with a painted image
of a ship and the legendary Kunjali is worshipped here.
According to historical records, the honorific title of
‘Kunjali’ was bestowed by the Zamorin on the Commandants
of his Naval force in recognition of their prowess in maritime
warfare.
The peace treaty, the Zamorin signed with the Portuguese in
1528 that allowed them to build a fort at Ponnani, which was
a strategic position. This was the first instance when the
relation between the Zamorin and the Muslim seamen turned
sour. This was a major turn in Kunjali Marakkar history.
Kunjali-IV gained popularity not only among his people but he assisted other enemies of the Portuguese like
the Rani of Ullal and Sultan of Bijapur.
In 1598, the Portuguese convinced the Zamorin that Marakkar IV intended to take over his Kingdom to
create a Muslim empire. In an act of betrayal, the Zamorin joined hands with the Portuguese who brutally
killed him.
A museum dedicated to Kunjali Marakkars has been built in Thiruvananthapuram.
They were looking for textiles to exchange with the spices they traded in the East Indies
Nagapatam in Madras and Chinsura in Bengal were their principal strongholds.
But soon their Indian possessions were eventually conquered by the English.
Their other principal factories in India were at Surat, Bimlipatam, Karaikal, Chinsura, Baaranagar,
Kasimbazar, Balasore, Patna and Cochin.
The Dutch replaced Portuguese.
Battle of Colachel:
Battle of Colachel in which the Dutch were defeated by the army of Marthandavarma, Maharaja
of Travancore.
De Lannoy was a Dutch official who was captured in this battle and made great contributions to
the Travancore army.
Pondicherry:
The history of Puducherry can broadly be classified in two periods- Pre-Colonial period and Colonial Period.
Pre-Colonial Period:
The Pre-Colonial period started with the reign of the Pallavas who continued to rule the empire
from 325 A.D. – 900 A.D., then came the Chola dynasty for the time period from 900 A.D. –
1279 A.D., continued by Pandya Dynasty from 1279 A.D. -1370 A.D.
During 14th Century, it was under the rule of the Naikship of Gingee denoting the Vijayanagar
Empire from 1370 A.D. – 1614 A.D which was conquered by the Sultan of Bijapur and he
continued for the phase from 1614 A.D. - 1638 A.D.
It was during the period of the Sultan when the Portuguese and Danish merchants used the place
as the trading center.
Colonial Period:
The colonial period started with the Portuguese as they were the first Europeans to trade in textile
in 1521 and subsequently with the Dutch and the Danes in the 17th century.
Portuguese established a factory in Puducherry at the beginning of 16th c, but were compelled to leave a
century later by the ruler of Gingee, who found them unfriendly.
After that the Danes shortly set up an establishment in Puducherry.
Then Dutch who had also set up trading posts in Porto Novo and Cuddalore.
The French, who had trading centres in the North, Mahe and Madras were invited to open a trading centre in
Puducherry by the new ruler of Gingee to compete with the Dutch.
During the Nine Years' War, the Dutch East India Company laid siege to the French fort of Pondicherry in
1693, whose commander Francois Martin surrendered on 6 September of the same year. Pondicherry was
restored to French rule in 1699, owing to the provisions of the Treaty of Ryswick.
In spite of a treaty between the English and French not to interfere in local politics, the intrigues continued.
Subsequently France sent Lally Tollendal to regain the French losses and chase the English out of India.
After an initial success they razed Fort St. David in Cuddalore to the ground, but strategic mistakes by Lally
led to the loss of the Hyderabad region and the siege of Puducherry in 1760. In 1761 Puducherry was razed
to the ground in revenge and lay in ruins for 4 years.
In 1765 the town was returned to France after a peace treaty with England in Europe.
In the next 50 years Puducherry changed hands between France and England with wars and peace treaties.
On November 1, 1954, the French possessions in India were de facto transferred to the Indian Union and
Puducherry became a Union Territory and finally ratified in 1962.
Dutch Malabar:
Also known by the name of its main settlement Cochin.
The battle between the Dutch and the Portuguese started in December 1661.
1661 and 1795 - started with the capture of Portuguese Quilon, and ended with the conquest of Malabar by
the British in 1795.
12
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 06
Rise of East India
Company - II
2
Columbian Exchange:
The terms Old World and New World are used in reference
to the Age of Exploration.
The Old World refers to Europe, Africa, and Asia, while the
New World refers to North America, South America, and the
Caribbean.
This system of naming these two different “worlds” is largely
Eurocentric.
The Columbian exchange, also known as the Columbian
interchange, named for Christopher Columbus, was the
widespread transfer of plants, animals, culture, human
populations, technology, diseases, and ideas between the
Americas, West Africa, and the Old World in the 15th and 16th
centuries.
It also relates to European colonisation and trade following
Christopher Columbus’s 1492 voyage. Invasive species,
including communicable diseases, were a by-product of the
Exchange.
Old World to New World: Coffee, wheat, cotton, barley,
rice, sugarcane and sugar beet, etc.
New World to Old World: Avocado, cashew, cocoa bean,
potato, maize, rubber, tobacco, etc.
Imperialism:
Imperialism is a political system in which a rich and powerful country controls other countries (colonies)
which are not as rich and powerful as itself while colonialism is the practice by which a powerful country
controls another country or countries, in order to become richer.
Britain’s Imperialism and White Man’s Burden:
The imperial history of Britain starts with the conquest of Ireland in the 16th Century.
The English emerged as the ‘New Romans’ conquesting territories one after the other.
The English considered it as a ‘White Man’s Burden’.
3
Mir Jafar: A rebellious commander, husband of Alivardi Khan’s sister, alarmed (Hindu) subject
population.
Jagat Seth, Omichand, Rai Ballabh, Rai Durlabh and others opposed him.
He defeated Shaukat Jang and killed him in a battle.
Siraj also developed a strong contempt for the English because:
English Fortifications in Calcutta.
Misuse of Dastaks by the English.
Company gave asylum to a political fugitive Krishna Das, son of Raj Ballabh and fled with treasures.
The British assumed that the Nawab would be under French’s influence.
He seized the English factory at Kasimbazar, marched upon Calcutta and captured it.
Black Hole incident of Calcutta (Kolkata) describes how British prisoners were held captive by the
army of the Nawab of Bengal, for one night, in the 'black hole' of Fort William in Calcutta. The total
number of prisoners locked in the black hole was probably 146, of whom 23 came out alive.
Madras authorities dispatched a naval force under Admiral Watson and a land force under Robert Clive.
He recaptured Calcutta by the Treaty of Alinagar (Feb, 1757) which was concluded between the English
and Nawab Siraj-ud-daulah.
Then Clive chose to fight the Nawab with the weapon of political conspiracy. Clive arranged a conspiracy in
which Mir Jafar, Rai Durlabh Jagat Seth and Omi Chand joined.
Clive was now in search of a pretext to make war. He charged the Nawab with violating the treaty of
Alinagar and led an expedition against him.
Battle of Plassey:
The Fight:
On June 23, 1757, Battle of Plassey was fought. It was a mere Skirmish.
Mir Jafar was offered the position of nawab who would help the company in lieu of its services. Due to
this, the English had won the battle even before it was fought.
Siraj-ud-Daulah was murdered by Mir Jafar’s son Miran.
Mir Jafar became the Nawab of Bengal.
He was offered a large sum of money to the company along with the zamindari of 24 parganas.
Significance of the Battle of Plassey:
It laid the foundation of the British Empire in India and established the supremacy of the English Military in
Bengal.
English's main rival French was ousted.
English got grants of territories. The revenue from them helped them to further strengthen their military.
English sovereignty over Calcutta was recognised.
The English put their resident at the court of Nawab to better control his affairs.
6
Oudh:
Nawab Reign
Saadat Ali Khan I 1722 – 19th March 1739
Muhammad Muqim 1739 – 5th October 1754
Jalal-ud-din Haider Abul Mansur Khan 1754 – 26th January 1775
Muhammad Yahya Mirza Amani 26th January 1775 – 20th April 1797
Wazir Ali Khan 21st September 1797 – 21st January 1798
Saadat Ali Khan II 21st January 1798 – 11th July 1814
Ghazi-ud-din Haider 11th July 1814 – 19th October 1827
Nasir-ud-din Haider Shah 19th October 1827 – 7th July 1837
Muhammad Ali Shah 7th July 1837 – 7th May 1842
Amjad Ali Shah 7th May 1842 – 13th February 1847
Wajid Ali Shah 13th February 1847 – 11th February 1856
Begum Hazrat Mahal 11th February 1856 – 5th July 1857
Wife of Wajid Ali Shah and mother of Birjis Qadra.
Birjis Qadr 5th July 1857 – 3rd March 1858 (in rebellion)
8
On the other hand, Mir Jafar, handed over the districts like Midnapore, Burdwan and Chittagong to the
English.
It led to the duty-free trade in Bengal, except for a duty of 2 per cent on salt.
After Mir Jafar’s death, his son Nazam -ud-Daulah was made Nawab.
But real power vested with Naib Subedars who could be appointed by English.
Return of Clive (1765 – 67):
Treaty of Allahabad was signed on 12th August 1765:
Between the Mughal Shah Alam II and Robert Clive.
Marks the political and constitutional involvement and the beginning of British rule in India.
Terms of the Agreement:
Oudh:
Nawab surrendered Allahabad and Kara to Shah Alam.
He agreed to pay 50 lakh war indemnity to the company.
The Company promised to support the Nawab against an
outside attack provided he paid for services of the troops.
He confirmed Balwant Singh, Zamindar of Banaras,
possession of his full state.
Shah Alam II:
The Mughal emperor Shah Alam handed over the Treaty of
Allahabad to Robert Clive which transferred tax collecting
rights in Bengal, Bihar and Orissa (Bengal Subah) to the East India Company.
The fugitive Shah Alam was taken under protection and was to reside at Allahabad.
He was assigned to Allahabad and Kara.
He had to issue firman granting Diwani rights of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa to Britishers.
In return would pay 26 lakhs annually and will be providing for the expenses of Nizamath of these provinces.
Mughals had two main officers:
Subahdar: He used to handle Nizamat i.e., defence, police, criminal justice.
Diwan: He was the Chief Financial Officer was revenue incharge and civil justices.
He did not annex Oudh and made it a buffer state against Afghans (Ahmad Shah Abdali) and Marathas.
Also, Shuja-ud-Daulah became a grateful ally.
Bengal:
The Dual system (Company and Nawab).
The Company acquired real power by this system.
The Diwani by the Mughal emperor was given to them.
10
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 07
Rise of East India Company III
2
British vs Marathas:
7
Maratha Confederacy:
After the fall of Mysore in 1799–1800, the Marathas
were the only major power left.
The Maratha Empire confederacy of five major
chiefs:
1. The Peshwa (Prime Minister) capital city of
Poona,
2. The Gaekwad chief of Baroda,
3. The Scindia chief of Gwalior,
4. The Holkar chief of Indore, and
5. The Bhonsle chief of Nagpur.
The Maratha chiefs were engaged in internal
quarrels among themselves. The British had
repeatedly offered a subsidiary treaty to the Peshwa
and Scindia, but Nana Fadnavis refused strongly.
Second Anglo Maratha War (1803 – 05):
Richard Wellesley (1798-1805) was the Governor General.
Towards the war:
In 1795, Peshwa Madhavrao Narayan committed suicide.
Bajirao II, the worthless son of Raghunath Rao, became the Peshwa and Nana Phadnavis became the
Chief minister.
There were internal conflicts, which gave the English an opportunity to intervene. Nana Phadnavis died in
1800.
The course of War:
In 1801, the Peshwa brutally murdered the brother of Jaswantrao Holkar, Vithuji.
Jaswant fought against the combined forces of Scindia and Bajirao II and defeated them in 1802.
He made Vinayakrao, son of Amritrao, Peshwa seat. As a result of it Bajirao II fled to Bassein.
On December 31, 1802 signed a treaty with the English.
Treaty of Bassein - 1802:
Bajirao II had to maintain a subsidiary force of 6000 infantry with a proportionate artillery, the annual
expense of which was estimated to be Rs 26 lakh.
Bajirao II agreed not to entertain any foreign national hostile to the British in his service.
He needed to accept British intercession to settle his differences with the Nizam and the Gaekwad and not to
negotiate with any other state his differences with the two of them.
Bajirao II had to surrender the city of Surat to the British.
He also needs to give up all claims for Chauth on the Nizam’s dominions; and thus, this treaty is regarded as
the "death knell of the Maratha Empire”.
11
Diplomatic skills of English: It helped them in winning allies and isolating enemies. English maintained an
organised network of spies while Marathas were ignorant and lacked information about their enemies.
Progressive outlook of English: English was rejuvenated by the Renaissance. They were deeply indulged in
scientific innovations, ocean exploration and acquisition of colonies. On the other hand Indians were deeply
engulfed in old dogmas and superstitions.
With respect to the fall of Marathas it can be well said that: English attacked a divided house which
started crumbling with the first push.
In 1803, the Daulat Scindia signed the Treaty of Surji-Anjangaon with the British after the Battle of
Assaye and Battle of Laswari:
Cede all territory between the Ganga and the Yamuna.
Gave up his control over the imperial cities of Delhi and Agra as well as the Rajput states.
He has an accredited minister at his court.
He surrenders parts of Bundelkhand, Ahmednagar, Broach and territories west of the Ajanta hills.
He accepted the Treaty of Bassein.
He renounced all claims on the Peshwa, the Mughal emperor, the Nizam, the Gaikwad and the English
Company and to accept the latter as a sovereign authority.
He decided not to employ in his service any European without the consent of the British.
In return, the Company promised to provide Sindhia a force of 6 battalions of infantry, its expenses being
defrayed from the revenues of lands ceded by him.
Restore Bhonsle Asirgarh, Burhanpur, Powanghur and Dohud and territories in Khandesh and Gujarat
depending on these forts.
By the supplementary treaty of Burhanpur (1804) the British agreed to support him with a subsidiary
force.
The British started hostilities against Yashwantrao Holkar. The Treaty of Rajpurghat, signed on 24
December 1805, forced Holkar to give up Tonk, Rampura, and Bundi.
Treaty of Rajpurghat (1805):
To renounce all claims to the area north of the Bundi hills.
Never to entertain in his service any European.
On their part, the British promised:
Not to disturb Holkar's possessions in Mewar and Malwa or interfere with the rulers south of the
Chambal.
To restore those of his possessions situated south of the River Tapti.
Punjab before Ranjit Singh:
Guru Gobind Singh transformed the Sikhs into a militant sect to defend their religion and liberties.
After Guru Gobind Singh, Banda Bahadur assumed the leadership of Sikhs. He revolted against the Mughals
during Bahadur Shah's reign.
In 1715, Farrukhsiyar defeated and killed Banda Bahadur, for which the Sikhs faced a major setback.
The Sikh polity became leaderless and got divided into Bandai (Liberal) and Tat Khalsa (Orthodox).
In 1784, Kapur Singh Fazullapuria united the Sikhs under Dal Khalsa.
Two sections emerged out of it:
1. Budha Dal: Army of veterans
2. Taruna Dal: Army of young.
Invasion by Ahmed Shah Abdali helped Sikhs to wrest the benefit of instability and organise themselves
better.
15
They consolidated themselves into misls which were a military brotherhood and had democratic set-up.
12 misls: Alluwalia, bhangi, Dallewwalia, Faizulapuria, kanhaiya, krosasinghiya, Nakkai, Nishaniya,
Phulakiya, Ramgarhiya, Sukerchakiya.
Misl was administered by Gurumatta Sangh, a socio-political and economic system.
The credit for organising the misls and strengthening the strong kingdom goes to Ranjit Singh of
Sukerchakia misl.
Ranjit Singh (1792-1839) belonged to Sukerchakia Misl.
He Captured Lahore in 1799 and Amritsar in 1802.
He was a military genius. It is said that he possessed one of the largest armies in Asia.
He was very tolerant towards other religions. Most
of his trustworthy nobles were non-sikhs.
He signed a Tripartite treaty (1838) with Lord
Auckland and Shah Shuja to place the latter on the
thrones of Afghanistan by invasion.
A French visitor to the court of Ranjit Singh,
Compared Ranjit Singh with Napoleon Bonaparte.
Political instability that started in Punjab after the
death of Ranjit Singh in 1839 and quick succession
of rulers in the Punjab and the high handedness of
the military and Sikhs allies like Prime Minister
Rajan Lal Singh, the Commander-in-Chief Misar
Tej Singh and Dogra Raja Gulab Singh made the
British intervention possible.
PW Web/App: https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 08
Rise of East India Company
- Governor Generals
2
After the Treaty of Turkmanchai in 1828 (concluded Russo-Persian war), English had firm belief that
Russia could invade India.
In such a scenario, English wanted to create Afghanistan as a buffer state to protect their Indian occupation
from potential Russian invasion.
There were three conflicts in 1839–42; 1878–80 and 1919.
Britain tried to extend its control over Afghanistan and to oppose Russia so as to have influence in
Afghanistan.
Ranjit Singh signed the Tripartite Treaty (1838) with Lord Auckland and Shah Shuja to place the latter on
the thrones of Afghanistan by invasion.
However, he refused to give access to the British Army through his territory to attack Dost Mohammed, the
Afghan Amir.
Raja Ranjit Singh had a weak position vis-a-vis the Company from 1809 to 1839.
Despite this, he took no step to organise a coalition of other Indian princes or maintain a balance of power.
After the death of Ranjit Singh in 1839, the region witnessed political instability due to the quick succession
of rulers in the Punjab
The high handedness of the military and Sikhs allies like:
Prime Minister Rajan Lal Singh,
The Commander-in-Chief Misar Tej Singh
Dogra Raja Gulab Singh
All these issues made the British intervention possible.
Punjab After Ranjit Singh:
Beginning of Court Factions:
Kharak Singh:
He was Ranjit Singh’s son and successor.
He was not efficient and thus court factions became active.
Kharak Singh’s sudden death in 1839 and accidental death of his son, Prince Nau Nihal Singh 1840
left Punjab in a state of anarchy.
The quarrel over succession provided an opportunity for decisive action by the English.
Chand Kaur (1841):
Chand Kaur was the wife of Kharak Singh and became the only female ruler of Sikh Empire.
She assumed the title of Malika Muqaddasa.
She was abdicated in 73 days.
Sher Singh (1841 - 43):
He was also the son of Ranjit Singh but was murdered in 1843.
Thereafter discontent was growing among the troops as a result of irregularity of payment.
5
Since the Sikhs were not able to pay the entire war indemnity, Kashmir, including Jammu, was sold to
Gulab Singh in lieu of Rupees 75 lakh.
Treaty of Bhairowal (1846):
The Sikhs were unhappy with the transfer of Kashmir Sikhs rebelled.
Rani Jindan was removed as regent.
The council for regency of Punjab was set up with 8 Sikh sardars presided over by Resident Henry
Lawrence.
Second Anglo-Sikh War (1848–49):
The causes of the First Anglo-Sikh War was as follows:
The defeat in the first Anglo-Sikh War.
The treaties of Lahore and Bhairowal were highly humiliating.
Inhuman treatment to Rani Jindan, sent to Benares as a pensioner.
Second Anglo-Sikh War (1848–49):
Mulraj, the governor of Multan on being replaced, revolted and murdered two English officers.
Sher Singh was sent to suppress the revolt, but he himself joined Mulraj, leading to a mass uprising in
Multan.
Lord Dalhousie, a hardcore expansionist, got the pretext to annex Punjab completely.
Course of the War:
Lord Dalhousie himself proceeded to Punjab. Three important battles fought:
1. Battle of Ramnagar, led by Sir Hugh Gough, the commander-in-chief of the Company.
2. Battle of Chillianwala, in January 1849.
3. Battle of Gujrat, in February 1849.
The Sikh army surrendered at Rawalpindi and Afghans chased out of India.
Result at the end of the War:
It surrendered the Sikh army and Sher Singh in 1849 and subsequently the English annexed the Punjab.
Dalhousie for his service was given thanks and promotion by the British Parliament.
Three-member board to govern Punjab with Lawrence brothers (Henry & John) and Charles Mansel.
In 1853, the board was nullified and Punjab was placed under a chief commissioner.
John Lawrence became the first chief commissioner.
Significance: Both sides developed mutual respect for each other’s fighting spirit. Sikhs fought on the
British side at many occasions including in the 1857 revolt.
They were accompanied in other campaigns and wars until the Indian independence in 1947.
7
Sindh:
In the 18th century, Sindh was ruled by the Kallora chiefs.
In 1758, an English factory was built at Thatta.
In 1761, Ghulam Shah ratified the earlier treaty and excluded
other Europeans from trading there.
This advantage was enjoyed by the English up to 1775. Later
Sarfaraz ruled and closed the factory.
Rise of Talpura Amirs
In the 1770s, the Baloch tribe of Talpura, started settling in
Sindh.
The Talpuras rose in influence and power very quickly and in
1783 established their total control over Sindh under the
leadership of Mir Fateh Ali Khan.
The ruler Mir Fateh Khan ruled the country with his
brothers known as Char Yar.
In 1800, Mir died and his brothers divided the kingdom
among themselves. They called themselves Amirs.
Gradual Ascendancy over Sindh:
There was a belief that Napoleon was conspiring with Tipu Sultan to invade India.
Lord Wellesley counteracts the alliance of the French, Tipu Sultan and Shah Zaman - the Kabul monarch.
Tipu Sultan tried increasing influence in Sindh.
Mir Fatah declined Lord Wellesley’s proposals.
As a result, the British agent Crow left Sindh.
Tilsit Alliance:
In 1807, the alliance of Tilsit - Alexander I of Russia was joined by Napoleon of France.
The alliance had a condition of combined invasion of India by Land route.
This compelled the British to create a barrier between India and Russia.
8
Ranjit Singh agreed to British mediation in his disputes with the Amirs.
The treaty made Emperor Shah Shuja to give up his sovereign rights in Sindh.
Main objective was:
To obtain finances for the Afghan adventure.
Amirs’ territory operation against Afghanistan through Sindh.
Sindh Accepts Subsidiary Alliance (1839):
The Company persuaded Amirs:
to pay the money,
to consent to the abrogation 1832 treaty.
Under threat of superior force, Amirs accepted a new treaty:
British subsidiary force to be stationed at Shikarpur and Bukkar.
Pay Rs 3 lakh annually for the maintenance of the Company’s troops.
No negotiations with foreign states without Company.
Provide a storeroom at Karachi for military supplies.
Abolishing all tolls on the Indus.
Furnish an auxiliary force for the Afghan war if required.
Capitulation of Sindh:
Amirs of Sindh did not liked:
The 1st Anglo-Afghan War (1839–42), fought their soil.
The presence of the British troops in their region.
They were asked to pay for all this, which they did.
They were neither rewarded nor thanked, but were charged with hostility.
They were also charged with treasonable activities against the British.
Ellenborough, was in a precarious position due to the:
Recent Afghan war reverses.
He sent Outram to Sindh to negotiate a new treaty in which Amirs were required:
to cede important provinces as the price of their past transgressions,
to supply fuel to the Company’s steamers plying on the Indus.
And to stop minting coins.
Also, a succession dispute intervened through Napier and started a war when the Amirs rose in revolt.
Battle of Miani & Battle of Dobo:
Battle of Miani & Battle of Dobo, wherein 3000 British troops defeated 12,000 Baluchis in
1843 under Charles Napier.
Amirs made captives and banished from Sindh.
In 1843, under GG Ellenborough, Sindh was merged into the British Empire and Charles Napier
was appointed its first governor.
10
Why and how did the British become the Master of India?
The entire process of annexation and consolidation of the British empire in India took almost 100 years.
During this period English relied on both
war and administrative policies to
impose their power.
They even resorted to using various
unscrupulous tactics to exploit regional
politics and finally to consolidate their
own rule over the entire India.
Major factors that led to the success of
English:
Superior Arms, Military and Strategy:
The English firearms included
muskets and cannons which were
better than Indian arms in speed and range.
Indian officers and the ranks could never match their British counterparts. Many Indian rulers employed
European officers to train their troops, but in the absence of originality they became mare imitators.
Military Discipline and Regular Salary:
Discipline in the military and payment of regular salary helped the English to buy the loyalty of their
soldiers.
While Indian rulers were dependent on personal retinues or a rabble of mercenary elements who could
turn rebellious or join the opponents when the going was not good.
Civil Discipline and fair selection system:
The company officers and troops were given charge on the basis of their reliability and skill.
11
While the Indian administrators and the military officers were appointed on the basis of caste and
personal relation.
As a result, the leadership on the Indian side remained weak and the military officers often tended to be
rebellious and disloyal in order to pursue their own self-interest.
Brilliant leadership and the support of second line leaders:
English officers like Clive, Warren Hastings, Elphinstone, Munro, Marquess of Dalhousie, etc.
displayed a rare quality of leadership.
They were backed by the long list of secondary leaders like Sir Eyre Coote, Lord Lake, Arthur
Wellesley, who fought not only for the
leaders but also for the cause of glory
for their country.
Indian rulers too had brilliant leaders
like Haider Ali, Tipu Sultan, Chin
Kilich Khan, Madhu Rao Sindhia and
Jaswant Rao Holkar, but they often
lacked a team of second line of trained
personnel.
Also, they were fighting for personal or
dynastic advancement.
They often supported the British
against the neighbouring rulers; the consciousness of India was missing.
Strong Financial Backup:
The company was earning huge profits in trade with India and the rest of the world. It had adequate
income to finance its wars. Also, because of their superiority in sea Power, this vast number of resources
they possess were available to them in times of need.
Nationalism:
Britishers were making huge economical advances and were fueled with Nationalism.
Indians on the other hand were weak, divided among themselves and drowned deep into ignorance and
religious backwardness.
Lack of materialist vision was also a cause of their defeat at the hands of the British.
Self-Study:
Rohellas and Bangash Pathans:
In Gangetic Valley the Rohillas and Bangash Pathan carved out independent principalities for themselves.
Rohillkhand and the kingdom of Bangash Pathan were the result of large-scale Afghan migration from the
17th century onwards into India.
Daud Khan was awarded the Katehr region (Rohillkhand) in the then northern India by Aurangzeb to
suppress Rajput uprisings, which had affected this region.
His adopted son, Ali Mohammad, succeeded him in 1721 and taking advantage of Nadir Shah’s invasion
set up a small kingdom of Rohilkhand in the Himalayan Foothills between Kumaon and Ganga. He became
so powerful that he refused to send tax revenues to the centre.
12
Ali Muhammad Khan died, leaving his six sons behind. However, two of his elder sons were in Afghanistan
at the time of his death while the other four were too young to assume the leadership of Rohilkhand.
As a result, power transferred to other Rohilla Sardars including Najib-ud-Daula who got aligned with
Abdali. He also convinced Shuja-ul-Daula, the Nawab of Oudh, to join Ahmad Shah Abdali's forces against
the Marathas.
Muhammad Khan Bangash, who belonged to the Bangash tribe, became the first Nawab of Farrukhabad in
1713 in Uttar Pradesh, India. He named the city after then Mughal emperor Farrukhsiyar.
The Bangash Nawabs encouraged merchants and bankers to come and settle here. Also, established the
Farrukhabad mint known for quality.
The third Nawab, Ahmad Khan Bangash, took part in the Third Battle of Panipat in 1761 and supported
Ahmad Shah.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 09
Rise of EIC – Diplomacy
2
Rise of EIC:
The states brought under the Ring fence were assured of protection from external aggression but at
their own cost.
These states were required to maintain subsidiary forces which were to be organised, equipped and
commanded by the officers of the company, who in turn were to be paid by the states.
E.g., Awadh was brought under the Ring fence to safeguard Bengal from Marathas and Afghan
invaders.
The British came to India in 1600 as traders in the form of the East India Company, which
had the exclusive right of trading in India under a charter granted by Queen Elizabeth I.
In 1765, Clive the then Governor of Bengal secured from Shah Alam II, the powerless and effete
Mughal emperor the Diwani (rights over revenue and civil justice) of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa,
stipulating in return to pay the emperor an annual subsidy of 26 lakhs of rupees.
Also, the Nawab of Bengal became a mere pensioner; the company was to pay him a fixed annual
sum of Rs. 53 lakhs for the support of the Nizamat. Clive thus established a Double Government
with the Company as Diwan, and the Nawab as Nazim (Nizamat).
The acquisition of the Diwani of Bengal and the introduction of the Double Government system by
Clive in 1765 became an important building block for the British empire.
Under the dual system, the Nawab was limited to the position of a figurehead and the
administration was in the hands of the Deputy Nawab, who was the nominee of the company and
an English resident posted at the Durbar and the used to decide every matter of significance in the
arrangement (Dual Government) a fatal divorce of power from responsibility was inherent which
lead to most of the scandals and abuses speedily to their appearances.
In the first place, the abuses of private trade reached its peak because the Indian administrators in
this arrangement were open to illegitimate pressure, and unable to restrict the misconduct of the
company's servants.
And secondly, the ongoing demands of the company for increasing the revenue eventually
resulted in gross oppression of the peasantry.
Clive as the founder of British Empire:
He reached Madras in 1742 as a writer (clerk), but soon he joined the army.
The siege of Arcot (1751) turned the scales against the French in the Carnatic.
In 1753, he returned to England and again back to India in 1755.
In Bengal, he won the Battle of Plassey (1757) and reduced Mir Jafar to the position of a mere puppet of the
English. He returned back to England in 1760.
After the victory of Buxar, Clive was sent out to India again as governor and commander-in-chief of the
British possession in Bengal.
On his arrival in 1765, he concluded a Treaty of Allahabad. This was a master stroke of Clive’s policy.
By this treaty, he made Oudh a buffer state and legalised the holdings of the company in Bengal.
5
By his dual system, in Bengal (1765-72), he made the company a great power but with no responsibility.
He forced the company’s servants to sign covenants forbidding them to receive presents or to carry on
private inland trade.
He also organised the Society of Trade.
Above all, he transformed a mere trading body into a territorial power.
In 1772, Parliament opened an inquiry into the company's practices in India.
Questioned about some of the large sums of money he had received while in India, Clive pointed out that
they were not contrary to accepted company practice, and defended his behaviour by stating "I stand
astonished at my own moderation" given opportunities for greater gain.
The hearings highlighted the need for reform of the company; a vote to censure Clive for his actions failed.
Later in 1772, Clive was honored with Knight of the Bath and was appointed Lord Lieutenant of
Shropshire.
Robert Clive died in 1774.
Warren Hastings (1772-1785):
“If Clive was the founder of the British Empire in India, Warren Hastings was its’ administrative
organiser’.
When he was appointed Governor of Bengal in 1772, the dual system of administration was transferred to
the Servants of the Company. The Nawab was deprived of even a nominal share in administration.
Hastings wanted not so much to increase the company’s possession as to consolidate and strengthen what it
had already got.
He helped the Nawab of Oudh in his designs upon Rohilkhand to maintain Oudh as a strong buffer state.
In the First Maratha war and Second Mysore war, he showed great diplomatic power.
The first Anglo-Maratha war was brought to a close by the famous Treaty of Salbai in 1782.
It saved the British from the combined opposition of Indian powers.
In war with Haider Ali, Warren Hastings bribed the Nizam.
Treaty of Mangalore (1784) gave peace for some time with Mysore.
Regulating Act of 1773, Act of 1781 and Pitt’s India Act was passed during his reign.
He established Calcutta Madrasa.
Asiatic Society of Bengal was founded by Sir William Jones in 1784 during his tenure.
His strained relation with Maharaja of Bengal Chait Singh led to impeachment in England.
On return to England, Hastings was impeached in the House of Commons for alleged crimes in India,
notably embezzlement, extortion and coercion, and an alleged judicial killing of Maharaja Nandakumar.
His prosecution was managed by MPs including Edmund Burke, encouraged by Sir Philip Francis.
The House of Lords acquitted him of all charges on 24 April 1795.
Lord Cornwallis (1786-1793):
6
Cornwallis was anxious to maintain peace and neutrality and to avoid entanglements with the Indian
states.
But, the third Mysore War was an exception. To fight Tipu Sultan, he concluded alliance with the Nizam and
the Marathas.
By the Treaty of Seringapatam (1792), Tipu agreed to cede half his dominions, to pay a large war
indemnity and to surrender two of his sons as hostages.
He introduced the Permanent Settlement in Bengal.
In his administrative reforms, Cornwallis built a superstructure where the foundations had been laid by
Warren Hastings.
He tried to purify the administration. His Judicial reforms were embodied in the famous Cornwallis code. It
was based on the principle of separation of powers.
He introduced Permanent Revenue Settlement in 1793.
He tried to organise civil services but the exclusion of Indians from high posts was a short-sighted measure.
Expansion under Lord Wellesley (1798-1805):
When Lord Wellesley came to India, the British were locked in a life and death struggle with France all over
the world. So, he decided to raise the East India Company to a predominant position in India through an
aggressive policy.
He relied on three methods:
1. System of Subsidiary Alliances,
2. Outright war
3. Assumption of the territories of previously subordinated rulers.
Subsidiary Alliance:
The author and originator of this policy was not Wellesley but Dupleix, the French Governor.
Dupleix devised it and implemented it and later the same was followed by the British from Clive to
Wellesley.
The British in return were to defend the state from its enemies and follow a policy of non-interference in
their Internal matters.
Result of Subsidiary Alliance:
Subsidiary Alliance brought immense gain for the company by extending area under the influence and
at the same time buying peace in its territories, thus helping them in both expanding and consolidating
their empire.
4 stages of application of Subsidiary Alliance:
1. Stage I: Company offered to help a friendly Indian state with its troops to fight any war the state might be
engaged in.
7
The second Anglo-Maratha War had shattered the power of the Maratha Chiefs but not their spirit.
The Peshwa, Holkar and Bhonsle were defeated one by one and the Maratha confederacy was dissolved.
The Peshwa was deported to Bithur.
Paramountcy:
The subsidiary idea was somewhere more dignified as the state was treated at par
But in Paramountcy the states were annexed and became subjects
Major states were Nepal and Maratha.
Anglo-Nepal Relation:
Gorkha ruled over Nepal after annexing it from the successors of Ranjit Malla of Bhatgaon in 1760. They
started their expansion towards the south and in the process, they captured Butwal and Sheoraj.
This brought them into conflict with the English headed at that time by Lord Hastings. The war broke out
and ended with the Treaty of Sugauli 1816.
As per the terms of Treaty:
A British resident was to be stationed in Nepal.
Garhwal and Kumaon were ceded to British and Nepal pulled down its claims over Terai.
Nepal also agreed to withdraw from Sikkim.
The agreement reaped many benefits to the British:
British expansion reached up to the Himalayas’.
Its trading with Central Asia got easier.
Hill stations like Shimla, Mussoorie, Nainital came under British Possession.
Large number of Gorkhas joined the British Army.
During his reign the Ryotwari System was established in Madras by Thomas Munro (Governor of
Madras).
Lord Hastings started an all-out drive against the Pindaris and exterminated them by 1818.
Rajputana also came under British protection.
Thus, Lord Hastings succeeded in establishing in unmistakable terms the political sovereignty of England
over the whole of India. He fought 28 battles and won 120 fortresses.
Completion of the task of conquering the whole of India (1818 to 1857):
By 1818, the entire Indian sub-continent except the Punjab and Sindh had been brought under British
control.
9
Henry Hardinge started Sikh war and annexed William Bentinck annexed Cachar and Coorg.
Sutlej (Punjab)
Lord Dalhousie (1848-56):
He was an imperialist. He was not prepared to leave any opportunity of acquiring territory. His annexations
were both ‘War’ and ‘Peace’.
Annexation of war was based on the right of conquest and peace came by application of the Doctrine of
Lapse.
He advanced the policy of annexations by conquest:
1. Punjab (1849)- by 2nd Anglo Sikh war.
10
Annexation on the pretext of Misrule: Oudh was the unfortunate state that fell a victim to this instrument
of Dalhousie (1856).
Case of Berar: The arrears of the subsidy due against the Nawab went on accumulating. So, Dalhousie took
away the cotton-producing province of Berar from the Nizam in 1853.
Thus, Dalhousie went too far and too fast. His annexations and escheats worsened the situation. It burst out
in 1857, a year after lord Dalhousie left India.
11
The first link of railway communication was completed in 1855, and well-considered plans mapped out the
course of other lines and their method of administration.
Dalhousie encouraged private enterprise to develop railways in India for the good of the people and also to
reduce absolute dependence on the government.
However, as an authoritarian, utilitarian ruler, Dalhousie brought the railways under state control-attempting
to bring the greatest benefit to India from the expanding network.
Railway helped to transport a large number of natural resources like coal and metal from inland to export to
Britain.
Ganges Canal was completed; and despite the cost of wars in the Punjab and Burma, liberal provision was
made for metalled roads and bridges.
The construction of massive irrigation works such as the 350-mile Ganges Canal, which contains thousands
of miles of distributaries was a substantial project that was particularly beneficial for the largely agricultural
India.
Increasing irrigated area resulted in an increase in population.
Reforms to improve the condition of the increased population such as immunisation and establishment of
educational institutions were never implemented.
Set up a separate Public Works department (earlier with the military) and laid down a modern postal system.
Europeanization and consolidation of authority were the keynote of his policy.
In his administration Dalhousie vigorously asserted his control over even minor military affairs:
Sir Charles Napier resignation over dearness allowance to sepoys,
He was equally careful of the well-being of the European soldiers, providing them with healthy
recreations and public gardens.
He created an imperial system of post-offices and he also worked on reducing the rates of carrying letters
and introducing postage stamps.
He created the department of public instruction.
He freed converts to other religions from the loss of their civil rights
He inaugurated the system of administrative reports and enlarged the Legislative Council of India.
He played a significant role in the welfare of British economic interests
He gave encouragement to the culture of tea.
He worked in the protection of forests, Dalhousie also worked on the preservation of ancient and historic
monuments.
With the object of making the civil administration more European, he closed what he considered to be the
useless college in Calcutta for the education of young civilians:
He established a European system of training, training them in mufassal stations and subjecting them to
departmental examinations.
13
Bengal, long ruled by the Governor-General or his delegate, was placed under its own Lieutenant-
Governor in May 1854.
The military boards were swept away:
The higher commands in an army selection took the place of seniority
The clothing and a stud department were created.
The medical service underwent complete reorganisation.
A department of public works was established in each presidency, and engineering colleges were provided.
Important Battles at a Glance:
Battle of Khed (1707) Sahu defeated Tara Bai
Battle of Buxar (Oct 1764) The English defeated the combined forces of
Mir Qasim, Shuja Ud-daulah and Shah Alam
II
First Anglo-Mysore war Fought between Haider Ali and the English.
(1766-69) Finally, peace was restored
Second Anglo Mysore War Fought between the English and Haider Ali
later carried on by Tipu Sultan
(1780-84)
Second Anglo-Sikh War The English defeated the Sikhs and finally
(1848-49) annexed Punjab
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 10
Various Acts till 1858
2
Some, including Pitt, held that the crown should now take over the governmental authority which the
company has now assumed, but this view was held by few.
In 1767, the first intervention of parliament in the company affairs came in the form of a demand for a share
of the plunder to the extent of £ 4,00,000 (pound) per annum.
However, under the dual system, the Nawab was limited to the position of a figurehead and the
administration was in the hands of the Deputy Nawab, whose was the nominee of the company and an
English resident posted at the Durbar and the used to decide every matter of significance in the arrangement
(Dual Government) a fatal divorce of power from responsibility was inherent which led to most of the
scandals and abuses speedily to their appearances.
3
The abuses of private trade reached its peak because the Indian administrators in this arrangement were
open to illegitimate pressure, and unable to restrict the misconduct of the company's servants.
The ongoing demands of the company for increasing the revenue eventually resulted in gross oppression
of the peasantry.
In 1769, when the company was in debt of about £ 6 million, a dividend of 12.5% was declared, though
the Directors had to conceal facts and falsify accounts. And when the News of the famine in Bengal 1770 and
Haider Ali's successful onslaught into the Carnatic war reached England,
The company's stock showed a spectacular decline and before long rumours got abroad of the company's
true financial position.
In sheer desperation, the Directors of the company applied to the Bank of England for a loan of £
1,000,000 and while doing so they signed the death warrant of the company's independence.
As this resulted in the appointment of a select committee to enquire into the company's affairs which was
presided over by General Burgoyne who while proposing a resolution for the appointment of the committee
declared: "The most atrocious abuses that even stained the name of civil government called for redress… if
by some means sovereignty and law are not separated from trade, India and Great Britain will be suck &
overwhelmed never to rise again".
In 1772, they declared another dividend of 12.5% and they asked the Government for a loan of £ 1 million.
The Discrepancy was so glaring
that it caused the House of
Commons to appoint a second
(secret) committee to investigate
the reasons for it.
It became a very debatable and
interesting question that why
should a company go bankrupt,
when its servants were returning
with their pockets bulging with
gold.
Consequently, the committee
issued their reports. As expected, these were highly condemnatory in nature. Subsequently two Acts of
Parliament were passed.
The first granted the company a loan of £ 140,000 at 4% interest on certain terms and conditions.
While the second was the Regulation Act of 1773.
Lot of opposition came from the East India Company and its supporters.
This act is of great constitutional significance as it was the first move by the British Government towards
the centralization of administration in India and to control and regulate the affairs of the East India
Company.
4
○ They were to hold office for a period of five years and could be removed earlier only by the king on
the recommendation of the Court of Directors (Quorum - 3 members).
○ Further, the Governor General in council was vested with the civil and military government of the
Presidency of Fort William in Bengal (Bengal, Bihar and Orissa).
○ It made the Governors of Bombay and Madras presidencies subordinate to the Governor of
Bengal who were supposed to send reports with respect to revenue, government.
1773 Act:
“And be it enacted by the authority aforesaid, That in all cases whatsoever wherein any difference of opinion
shall arise upon any question proposed in any consultation, the said governor-general and council shall be
bound and concluded by the opinion and decision of the major part of those present: and if it shall
happen that, by the death or removal, or by the absence, of any of the members of the said council, such
governor-general and council shall happen to be equally divided; then, and in every such case, the said
governor-general, or in his absence, the eldest counsellor present, shall have a casting voice, and his opinion
shall be decisive and conclusive.”
The Act also prohibited the servants of the company from engaging in any private trade or accepting
gifts or bribes from the natives. Thus, laying down the foundational principle of honest administration. Also
provided liberal salaries.
The Act for the establishment of a Supreme Court at Calcutta in 1774, so as to create an independent
judiciary to check the executive.
Jurisdiction - Civil, criminal, admiralty and ecclesiastical matters.
All public servants of the company were answerable to it.
All British subjects (European/Indian) could seek redressal against any sort of oppression.
Appeal against the decision could be made to the King in Council in England.
○ Sir Elijah Impey as Chief Justice.
○ Chambers, Lemaister and Hyde as the puisne judges.
Summary:
The Act was the initiation of the centralization system.
It was the first step of the British Parliament to control and regulate the affairs of the East India Company.
It recognised the political as well as the administrative functions of East India Company.
It laid the foundation of central administration in India.
Amending Act of 1781:
This Act was remedial and supplementary in nature.
This act exempted the actions of the public servants of the company done by them in their official capacity
from the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
Assessment of the Act of 1773:
The Act was based on the principles of check and balances.
The Regulating Act of 1773, tried to sail in an uncharted sea. It left the details of administration in India to
the devices of the company.
6
However, it tried to organise an honest and efficient supreme authority in Bengal, Madras & Bombay and to
protect against the abuse of their powers by the servants of the company.
It was a failure and only added to Hasting’s difficulties instead of strengthening him.
The Act was in operation for 11 years till it was superseded by the Pitt’s India Act of 1784.
The Governor General Council having power over subordinate presidencies now included war,
diplomatic relations and revenue.
The Governor General Council was made subordinate to the British government. Forbidden to declare
war without prior sanction of the Court of Directors.
Introduced non-intervention in Princely states so as to avoid war.
It also modified the councils of Madras and Bombay on the pattern of that of Bengal.
The act was significant mainly for two reasons:
The company's territories in India were for the first time called the British possessions in India.
The British Government was given supreme control over the company's affairs and its
administration in India.
Wars and Treaties were prohibited by this act.
This act separated the Commercial functions of East India Company from Political functions.
○ Court of Directors to manage the Commercial functions.
○ The Board of Control will supervise and direct all operations of civil, revenue and military matters
of British possessions in India.
PW Web/App: https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 11
Various Acts and British
Policies
2
He was not entitled to sit and vote at the meetings of the council but only for the purpose of law making
and on invitation.
Also, a law commission was constituted with the purpose of consolidating, codifying and improving
India laws.
Lord Macaulay was the first Law Member of the council and became president of the law commission.
Bombay, Madras, Bengal and other territories were placed under the complete control of the Governor-
General-in Council.
The Act created a new presidency of Agra.
All revenues were to be raised under the authority of the Governor-General-in Council who was to have
complete control over the expenditure also.
Also brought about legislative centralization.
Governments of Madras and Bombay were drastically deprived of their powers of legislation. They were
left only with the right of proposing to the Governor-General-in-council projects of the laws which they
thought expedient.
It also enjoined the Government of India to take measures of amelioration of the condition of slaves and
abolition of slavery in India. (Act V 1843 Slavery was abolished by Lord Ellenborough)
By this Act, the control of the island of Saint Helena is transferred from the East India Company to the
Crown. (in the South Atlantic Ocean). Hence, it is called the Saint Helena Act as well.
Appointment of a separate governor for the Bengal Presidency so that the governor of Bengal is different
from the Governor-General.
It introduced for the first time, local representation in the India (control) legislative council with no
association of Indian elements.
Council’s conduct of work on the lines of British parliament.
Executive council retained veto power.
Out of the 6 new legislative members of the Governor-General's council, four members were appointed by
the local (provincial) governments of Madras, Bombay, Bengal and North Western Provinces.
Provincial representatives were to be civil servants of the company not less than a standing of 10
years.
The Central legislature was formed. First time legislation treated as a special function of Government.
Distinction between Legislative Councillors and executive councillors.
The Act also empowered the crown to appoint a law commission in England to examine the reports and the
drafts of the Indian law commission which had by then ceased to exist, and recommended legislative
measures.
Summary:
The lease to the company was extended indefinitely till further decision of Parliament.
The Civil Services exams were made open, and for this Macaulay Committee 1854 was appointed.
7
The law member became the permanent member of the executive council.
Additional six members were introduced for legislation.
The Governor General could veto the Legislative Council.
The Act was an Assessment of the Charter Act of 1853:
It was a compromise between two conflicting views.
Those who favoured the retention of the company's territorial authority were satisfied by the pro vision that
the company should continue to govern India in trust for the crown until the Parliament should otherwise
direct.
While those who wanted the substitution of Crown control for that of the company were now satisfied that
the number of directors were reduced from 24 to 18 of whom 6 were to be the nominees of the crown
and that the quorum was fixed at 10 so that when the meetings of the court were thinly attended, the
nominees of the Crown were able to have a majority.
Eventually, the Directors lost their patronage. One of the main shortcomings in the act however was the
continued exclusion of the people of the land with the work of legislation.
Lord Palmerston introduced the Bill for Better Government of India in the House of Commons in
February 1858.
During the second reading the ministry was changed.
Lord Derby, was the then United Kingdom Prime Minister.
Disraeli as the chancellor of the exchequer succeeded and introduced a new Bill.
The Act for the Better Government of India was passed in the British Parliament.
Finally, the act got the Royal assent on August 2, 1858.
Features of the Act:
The Act was also known as the Act for the Good Government of India.
The Act abolished the East India Company.
The Act transferred the powers of government, territories and revenues to the British Crown.
As per the Act, India was to be governed by and in the name of her majesty.
It ended the system of Double Government introduced by Pitt's India Act of 1784.
The Crown appointed a Governor-General and the Governors of the Presidencies.
The Act divided the patronage between the Crown, the Secretary of State and the authorities in India.
It declared the Secretary of State for India as a corporate body, can be sued and be sued in England and
India.
Secretary of State for India:
He was a member of the British Cabinet as well, accountable to parliament.
The Board of control and the Court of director was abolished.
The Act created a new office.
It vested with complete authority and control over Indian administration
The post was regarded as the Communication channel.
The Secretary of State was assisted by a 15-member council of India:
advisory body
chairman - secretary of state.
50% members having at least lived 10 years in India.
The appointment to covenanted civil services were to be made by open competition under the rules laid
down by the secretary of state with the help of civil service commissioners.
Features of the Act:
The post of Governor-General of India became the Viceroy of India.
Direct representative of the crown in India,
Lord Canning became the first Viceroy of India.
9
Act was followed by Queen Victoria’s proclamation to “the Princes, Chiefs and Peoples of India,” in
Allahabad on 1st November 1858 [Magna Carta of the People of India]
“We hereby announce to the Native Princes of India that all treaties, engagements made with them by or under
the authority of the Honorable East India Company are by us accepted, and will be scrupulously maintained, and
We look for a like observance on their part. We desire no extensions of Our present territorial possessions; and
while We will permit no aggression upon Our dominions or Our Rights to be attempted with impunity, We shall
sanction no encroachment on those of others, We shall respect the rights, dignity, and honor of Native Princes
as Our own; and we desire that they—as well as our own subjects—should enjoy prosperity, and that social
advancement, which can only be secured by internal peace and good government. We hold ourselves bound to
the Natives of Our Indian territories by the same obligations of duty, which bind us to all Our other subjects, and
those obligations by the Blessing of God, we shall faithfully and conscientiously fulfill….
……And it is our further will that, so far as may be, our subjects, of whatever race or creed, be freely and
impartially admitted to offices in our service, the duties of which they may be qualified, by their education,
ability, and integrity, duly to discharge….
Major Changes:
The Act made no interference in religion.
The policy towards Princely states was:
10
Subordinate Union
No more annexations of the princely states. Doctrine of lapse was null and void.
Assessment:
The Secretaries of State for India who were appointed according to the act of 1858 were far able men than
the members of the boards of control had been.
The British parliament was content with leaving the secretary of state alone to act as he pleased.
They started managing the affairs of India so efficiently that there were no occasions for the parliament to
give any directions or interfere in their work.
Also, as the most brilliant Englishmen had now entered the Indian Civil Service and were carrying on the
administrative work efficiently. It was thus thought ungenerous and unnecessary from the British point of
view, to criticise them.
Thus, by this way developed the theory of trusting the man on the spot and supporting him and leaving
him alone.
The members of parliament now realised that nothing was to be gained by interfering in the Indian affairs.
Thus, the interest of parliament in Indian affairs slackened after 1858.
Acts after 1858:
The Indian Councils Act 1861
The Indian Councils Act 1892
The Indian Councils Act 1909
The Government of India Act 1919
The Government of India Act 1935
The Indian Independence Act 1947
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture - 12
British Economic Policy
2
Agriculture:
❖ The society was technologically backward.
❖ Peasants were forced to pay an exorbitant amount of rent to the zamindars and jagirdars.
❖ The situation got more intensified during the later Mughal period with the development of the jagirdari crisis
and the fall in state’s revenue.
Position of Women:
❖ Patriarchal society and women possessed little individuality Raja Sawai Jai Singh of Amber and
of their own. Maratha General Parshuram Bhau tried
❖ Purdah, Sati, Child marriage, polygamy, and dowry for promoting widow remarriage but failed.
marriage were highly prevalent.
Slavery:
❖ Accounts of European travellers from the 17th century reveal the widespread prevalence of slavery in India.
❖ Some people were compelled to sell their offspring due to extreme poverty. Higher caste Rajputs and khatris
usually kept slave women for domestic work.
➢ Condition of Slaves:
✓ The condition of slaves in India was better than that in Europe.
✓ Slaves in India were treated as hereditary servants rather than as menials.
✓ Marriage used to take place among slaves and their offspring were considered free citizens.
✓ The advent of Europeans led to an increase in the slave trade in India.
✓ They used to purchase slaves from Bengal, Bihar and Assam and carry them to Europe and
America.
✓ Abyssinian slaves were sold at Surat, Madras and Calcutta.
✓ Declining income from the trade financial base shifted from trade to land revenue, from business of
trade to business of government.
❖ Because of these factors, the Charter Act of 1813 ended the monopoly and complete closure in 1833.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 13
British Policies II
2
British Policies II
Revenue Administration and Economic Policy of the British
The British policies were mainly centered on gaining maximum income from land without caring much about
Indian interests of the cultivators.
After the advent, they adopted three types of land tenures such as Zamindari System, Ryotwari System and
Mahalwari System.
⮚ Zamindari System (Permanent Settlement): Under this 19 per cent of the total area under the British
rule, i.e., Bengal, Bihar, Banaras, division of the Northern Western Provinces and northern Karnataka.
⮚ Ryotwari System: It covered about 51 per cent of the area under British rule comprising part of the
Bombay and Madras Presidencies, Assam and certain other parts of British India.
⮚ Mahalwari System: The third revenue system, called the Mahalwari Settlement, was introduced in 30
per cent of the total area under British rule i.e., the North Western Provinces, Central Provinces and the
Punjab with some variations.
3
Robert Clive did not annex Oudh but created it as a buffer state against Afghans (Ahmad Shah Abdali) and
Marathas. Also, Shuja ud Daula became a grateful ally. Annexation of Oudh would have put the
responsibility of protecting its frontier on the company.
Bengal
Robert Clive introduced the Dual system of government (Company and Nawab).
The Company acquired the real power.
Diwani by the Mughal emperor was given to them.
The Company appointed deputy diwans for collection
Mohd Reza Khan for Bengal
Raja Shitab Roy for Bihar
Earlier they already took Nizamat functions from new Nawab Nazm-ud-Daula.
The responsibility of administration rested on the shoulders of Nawab of Bengal.
The system led to administrative breakdown and proved disastrous for the common people.
Revenue Policy
Warren Hastings resorted to evolving a new system of revenue administration. His idea was centralization.
In 1772, created a 5-year settlement (quinquennial system) of land revenue. Bidding estates to the highest
bidder (Revenue Farming).
5
Assuming Zamindars were mere tax collectors and had no proprietary rights, no preference was given to
zamindar and sometimes they were discouraged from bidding.
In 1773 Corrupt collectors are replaced by Indian Diwans, and 6 provincial councils supervised them. These
are under the control of the Committee of Revenue at Calcutta. (centralization)
Impact
It was a failure, that affected peasants; revenue farmers try to extort max from the cultivators
Officer of East India Company participated in bidding through their servants (Hasting himself)
Over-assessment of the land and very high state demand.
Harshness in the method of collection — heavy arrears — default — revenue cultivators deserted the
field.
After the failure of 1772
In 1776 he changed the revenue admin to annual settlement, and preference was given to zamindars,
based on open auction to the highest bidder.
In 1781, the Office of diwan, and the provincial council were abolished.
The collector was appointed again but without having power in revenue settlement.
Also, Kanungos were appointed again.
The Committee of Revenue of Calcutta was in charge of the entire supervision.
From the above measure we can tell that Warren Hastings failed to provide a satisfactory revenue
administration system.
1. The Permanent Settlement (Cornwallis)
The other names were Jagirdari, Malguzari, Biswedari, and Istemrari Bandobast.
His conspicuous administrative measure was the Permanent Land Revenue Settlement of Bengal. It was
extended to the provinces of Bihar and Orissa.
Cornwallis at the time of his appointment was instructed by the Directors to find a satisfactory and
permanent solution to the problems of the land revenue system in order to protect the interests of both the
Company and the cultivators.
Permanent Settlement was introduced first in Bengal and Bihar and later in the southern district of
Madras and Varanasi.
It eventually spread all over northern India through a series of regulations dated till 1793.
On Cultivators
Taking hereditary rights of the land of peasants and giving it to Zamindars and reduced the status of
cultivators as tenants of Zamindars.
Deprivation of rights included customary rights like the right to use pasture and forest lands,
irrigation, canals, fisheries, and protection against rent enhancement.
High amounts of fixed revenue compelled the cultivators to fall into the misery of rack renting,
indebtedness and ejection.
The illegal method adopted by Zamindars like beating, and non-repaying had crushed cultivators
under distress.
Besides, the land revenue was fixed for a period from 20 to 40 years at a time.
Every peasant was held personally responsible for the direct payment of land revenue to the government.
The average income from different types of soil was estimated, the revenue-paying capacity of the
ryot was assessed and a proportion of the income was fixed as the share of the state.
It was mostly collected in cash.
Reformed system was presented in 1864, which immediately led to agricultural prosperity and expansion
of cultivation. But the system was interrupted by two famines in 1865-66 and 1876-78.
Mechanism Involved
For assessment of land survey of soil quality and field area needed to be conducted. It was a hectic task.
In Madras, no surveys were carried out in many districts assessmentwere decided on the basis of
previous years, (putcut assessment).
Compulsion to ryot to cultivate land against their wish and employ oppressive methods of collection
which led to the setting up of the Madras Torture Commission in 1854.
In madras, Munro was appointed governor because the Madras government was always short of
funds and readily introduced the temporary Ryotwari System.
Impoverishment of peasantry and the ruin of traditional agrarian structure under Ryotwari
contributed to the terrible Madras famine in 1867-78.
Negative Impact
The position of cultivator position became safer still it did not bring a system of peasant ownership of
lands.
The rigid revenue collection system pushed ryots into the hands of moneylenders (chetty).
As the government itself became a large Zamindar, it was entitled to raise revenue at will.
The cultivator was left at the mercy of the collecting officers.
This caused widespread oppression peasantry fell into extreme poverty.
No relaxation to cultivators on high-rate revenue in case of crop failure.
Harsh punishment on delayed payment.
Timeline of Ryotwari System
1820: The 1st revenue settlement in Bombay. The revenue demand was so high that in many places peasants
left villages especially in areas of poor soil and fluctuating rainfall the problem was particularly acute.
The 1830s: the problem became more severe. Steep decline in Prices of agricultural after 1832 and did not
recover for over 15 years which further reduced peasants’ income. At the same time famine struck in the
years 1832-34. 1/3 of the cattle of the Deccan were killed, and half the human population died. Those who
survived had no agricultural stocks to see them through the crisis. Revenue could rarely be paid without a
loan from a moneylender. But once a loan was taken, the ryot found it difficult to pay back. As debt mounted,
and loans remained unpaid, peasants’ dependence on moneylenders increased.
1840s: high level of peasant indebtedness everywhere.
11
Cotton Boom:
Before the 1860s, 3/4 of raw cotton imports into Britain came from America.
1861: American Civil War broke out. Raw cotton imports from America fell < 3% of the normal. Messages
were sent to India and elsewhere to increase cotton exports to Britain. In Bombay, cotton merchants visited
the cotton districts to assess supplies and encourage cultivation and were keen to secure as much cotton a s
possible to meet the British demand. They gave advances to moneylenders who promised to secure the
produce. The ryots in the Deccan villages suddenly found access to seemingly limitless credit.
Between 1860 and 1864 cotton acreage doubled. 1862: 90% cotton imports into Britain came from India.
1865: Civil War ended, cotton production in America revived and Indian cotton exports to Britain steadily
declined. Export merchants and moneylenders in Maharashtra were no longer keen to give credit. Demand
for Indian cotton fall and cotton prices slide downwards. While credit dried up, the revenue demand
increased.
(1st revenue settlement 1820s and 2nd in 1830s). Now it was time for the next demand was increased
dramatically: from 50 to 100%. Moneylender now refused loans as he no longer had confidence in the ryots
capacity to repay. This annoyed the ryots. The movement also got support from the Poona Sarvajanik Sabha
co-founded by M G Ranade.
Deccan Riots of 1875: The movement began at Supa, a village in Poona. (market centre where many
shopkeepers and moneylenders lived). Ryots from surrounding rural areas gathered and attacked the
shopkeepers, demanding their account books and debt bonds. They burnt account books, looted grain shops,
and in some cases set fire to the houses of sahukars. The revolt spread to Ahmednagar and then around 30
villages were affected.
Repression: Police posts were established in villages and forced peasants to submit. Army was called in and
many were convicted. It took several months to bring the situation under control.
Deccan Riots Commission: GOI pressured the Government of Bombay to set up a commission to
investigate the causes. Report was presented to the British Parliament in 1878.
1879: Deccan Agriculturists Relief Act was passed which ensured that the farmers could not be arrested and
imprisoned if they were unable to pay their debts.
3. Mahalwari Settlement
In 1833, the Mahalwari settlement was introduced in Punjab, the Central Provinces and parts of North
Western Provinces and the Gangetic Valley of British India. It was the synthesis of the Zamindari
System and Ryotwari System.
The basic unit of revenue settlement was the village or group of villages or the Mahal.
The ownership rights were vested with the peasants.
As the village lands belonged jointly to the village community, the responsibility of paying the revenue
rested with the entire Mahal or the village community.
So, the entire land of the village was measured at the time of fixing the revenue. Yet its benefit was
largely enjoyed by the government.
Mahal: In British revenue records mahal is a revenue estate which may be a village or group of villages.
12
The British brought Tea from China but China did not want British goods but demand for Indian
goods like ivory, raw cotton and opium. So, the company brought about the commercialisation of
these commodities in India. This trade to be known as the Triangular trade . [Calcutta - Canton -
London]
At the cost of the drain of wealth:
Earlier, there was little demand for British goods in India so the company exchanged goods with
gold and silver bullion. After the conquest of Bengal, the company made this purchase from
revenue collected from Indian subjects this was referred to as the drain of wealth from India.
Home charges:
During colonial rule in India, 'Home Charges' formed an important part of the drain of wealth from India.
It refers to the expenditure incurred in Britain by the Secretary of State on behalf of India which include:
Funds used to support the India Office in London.
Funds used to pay salaries and pensions of British personnel engaged in India.
Funds used for waging wars outside India in the context of neighbours by the British.
Dividends on East India Stock
To pay the interest on Home debt.
In-service and retired pay to members of the Indian Military and Civil Services when at Home
Charges of all descriptions paid in this country connected with the British troops serving in India and a
portion of the cost of transporting the British troops to and from India.
5. Wheat in Punjab
6. Cotton in Maharashtra and Punjab
7. Rice in Madras.
The British used a variety of methods to expand the cultivation of crops that they needed.
Story of Indigo: Does Colour Have a History?
These two images of cotton prints show a kalamkari print created by
weavers of Andhra Pradesh in India.
There is one thing common in the two prints: both use a rich blue
colour – commonly called indigo.
This blue was produced from a plant called indigo.
India was the biggest supplier of indigo in the world at that time.
Why The Demand for Indian Indigo?
Indian indigo was being used by cloth manufacturers in Italy,
France and Britain to dye cloth.
But the price of this was very high for small quantity.
European cloth manufacturers depend on woad plant, which make violet and blue dyes.
It is a temperate zone plant, so easily available in Europe.
Grown in Northern Italy, Southern France, Germany, Britain.
Weary of the competition woad manufacturers pressurized the govt to ban the import of indigo.
Cloth dyers preferred indigo as a dye, because Indigo produced a rich blue colour, whereas the dye from
woad was pale and dull. So,
The French began cultivating indigo in St Domingue in the Caribbean islands,
The Portuguese in Brazil
The English in Jamaica
The Spanish in Venezuela and in many parts of North America.
Between 1783 and 1789 the production of indigo in the world fell by half.
Britain Turns to India
Rising demand for indigo in Europe, the Company expand the area of cultivation
in India.
From the last decades of the eighteenth century, Bengal indigo came to dominate
the world market.
By 1810, the indigo imported into Britain from Bengal gone up to 95% [1788 it
was 30%].
15
Commercial agents, Company officials, Scotsmen and Englishmen came to India and became planters
attracted by the prospect of high profits.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 14
British Policies – Education
2
Robert Clive did not annex Oudh but created it as a buffer state against Afghans (Ahmad Shah Abdali) and
Marathas. Also, Shuja ud Daula became a grateful ally. Annexation of Oudh would have put the
responsibility of protecting its frontier on the company.
3
Bengal
Although the British had captured Bengal in 1757, the responsibility of imparting education remained only in
Indian hands.
The study of ancient texts written in Arabic, Persian and Sanskrit still continued.
In 1781, Warren Hastings established a Madrasa in Calcutta to encourage the study of Muslim laws along
with Arabic and Persian languages.
A decade later in 1791 due to the sincere efforts of the British resident, Jonathan Duncan, a Sanskrit College
was established to promote the study of Hindu laws and philosophy in Banaras .
Fort William College was an academy and learning centre of Oriental studies established by Lord Wellesley.
The East India Company began to adopt a dual policy in the sphere of education but it is discouraged.
The prevalent system of oriental education gave importance to western education and the English language.
The Charter Act of 1813 adopted a provision to spend one lakh rupees per annum for the spread of
education in India. Consequently, not even a single rupee out of the allocated funds could be spent on
education**.
General Committee of Public Instruction 1823: The grant of one lakh rupees provided by the Charter Act
of 1813 was placed at the disposal of the Committee. Most of the members of the Committee were admirers
of classical or oriental learning and Thomas Babington Macaulay was the President.
Contemporary British scholars were divided into two groups on the issue of the development of education in
India.
One group, called the Orientalists, advocated the promotion of oriental subjects through Indian languages.
The other group, called the Anglicists, argued the cause of western sciences and literature in the medium
of the English language.
Orientalist was led by H.T. Princep and the Anglicists by Lord Macaulay.
Bentinck got the resolution passed on 7 March 1835 which declared that henceforth Government funds
would be utilised for the promotion of western literature and science through the medium of the English
language.
“Macaulayian system”
The masses were not the aim. Through the process of Downward Filtration Theory, the English-educated
Indians will teach others and enrich vernaculars.
1. This policy was an attempt to create a system of education which educates only the upper strata of
society through English.
2. English became a court language and Persian was abolished as a court language.
3. Printings of English books were made free and available at a very low price.
4. English education gets more funding as compared to oriental learning.
5. In 1849, JED Bethune founded Bethune School.
6. Agriculture Institute was established at Pusa (Bihar)
7. The Engineering Institute was established at Roorkee.
Under Lord Hardinge English education received an impetus as he passed a resolution according to which
persons with knowledge of western science and of English were to be given preference for public
employment.
James Thomson, Lt Gov of NW Provinces (1843-53) developed a scheme for village education via vernacular
languages.
English Education Act of 1835:
It was based on Macaulay’s minutes.
English as the medium of instruction for higher education.
Called for Stopping the promotion of Oriental institutions (Calcutta Madrasa and Benaras Sanskrit College).
These institutions were regarded as “temples of darkness that were falling of themselves into decay”.
English textbooks produced.
Wood’s Dispatch
Sir Charles Wood was a firm believer in the superiority of the English race and sent his famous Dispatch on
Education of India in 1854.
This Dispatch evolved a comprehensive scheme of education with a larger vision so much so that it has been
styled as 'The Magna Carta of English Education in India.'
Wood served as President of the Board of Control under Lord Aberdeen (1852-1855), in Lord Palmerston's
first administration (1855-1858), and as Secretary of State for India in Palmerston's second government
(1859-1866).
8
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 15
British Policies –
Education II
2
The government accepted the recommendations of the report and the Indian Universities Act was passed
(1904). Secondary and primary education was precluded.
This act, in fact, aimed at tightening the government control over the educational institutions . It
increased the number of nominated members and reduced those of elected ones. In fact, this act reveals fully
the policy of centralization followed by Lord Curzon and was in a large measure responsible for his
unpopularity.
1. Universities were to make provision for:
Promotion of study and Research,
Appoint university professors and lecturers,
Setup University labs and libraries and
Undertake direct instructions of students.
2. Number of fellows of a university shall be:
The number of fellows were 50-100.
Normally hold office for a period of 6 years instead of for life.
Most of the fellows to be nominated by govt. (Calcutta, Mumbai and Madras- 20 each | Others 15).
3. The Governor control over the universities were further increased:
Veto the regulations passed by the Senate of a University.
Government can make additions alterations in the regulations framed by the Senate and
Even frame regulations itself over and above the head of the Senate.
4. Stricter conditions of affiliations for the private colleges were laid along with periodical inspection.
The private colleges were required to keep a proper standard of efficiency; government approval was
necessary for grant of affiliation or disaffiliation of colleges.
5. The Governor General in Council could define the territorial limits of a university or decide the
affiliation of colleges to University.
In 1906, the State of Baroda introduced compulsory primary education throughout its territories. Now
Nationalists thought why not Government of India could do so.
The government of India passed a Resolution on Education on 21st February, 1913.
Government of India refused to recognise the principle of compulsory education:
But accepted the policy of removal of illiteracy and
Advocated the progress of education.
It also recommended the setting up of residential and teaching universities.
Urged provincial govt to provide free elementary education to poor section.
Private efforts to be encouraged.
The government of India set-up a Commission under the chairmanship of Sir Michael Sadler (1917).
4
The first report 1937: It included the basic principles of the Wardha Scheme of education, its
aims, teachers and their training, organisation of schools, administration, inspection and inclusion
of craft centred education regarding handicrafts like spinning, weaving etc.
The second report 1938: It dealt with Agriculture, Metal work, Wood craft and other basic
handicraft. An elaborate curriculum of all those subjects and ways and means to establish their
correlation with other subjects was also suggested.
More conferences were held later and more committees were formed on this important subject. As
a result, more new features were added to this aspect of education which later on took the final
shape.
The conference of 1945 at Sevagram characterised Basic Education as “education for life”.
The conference considered it as a radical and important revolution in social and economic structure
of Indian society, i.e., creating a new way of life. Since then, Basic education came to be known as
‘Nai Talim’.
A conference of education ministers and educational workers was called by B.G. Kher in 1946,
took some important resolutions which affected the quality of Basic Education in different
provinces.
Free, universal and compulsory education should be provided for all boys and girls between the
ages of 7-14.
This education should be imparted in the mother-tongue of the child.
All education should centre round some basic craft chosen with due regard to the capacity of
children and the needs of the locality.
The committee suggested spinning and weaving, cardboard and wood work, leather work, kitchen-
gardening, agriculture and fishery as obviously suitable crafts.
The selected craft should be both taught and practised so that the children are able to produce
articles which can be used and may be sold to meet part of the expenditure on the school.
This craft must not be taught mechanically but its social and scientific implications were to be
studied side by side.
In this craft-centred education all the subjects to be taught were to be integrally related to the
selected craft or the child’s physical and social environment.
Sergeant Plan of Education (1944):
Sir John Sergeant, Educational Advisor to the Government of India made the following recommendations in
his scheme in 1944.
Envisaged establishment of elementary schools and high schools.
Children between the age limit 6-11 should be given compulsory and free education. 6-year course for
11-17.
Adequate technical, commercial & arts education.
9
Only those students should join higher schools that were to profit by higher education.
Admission to colleges should be restricted.
Intermediate classes should be attached to schools while the degree courses were to be of three year
duration.
2 types of high schools:
Academic
Technical and vocational school with different curriculum.
Recommended abolition of intermediate course and the addition of extra year at a high school and
college.
They envisaged a 40-year educational reconstruction plan which was reduced to 16 years by Kher
committee 1950.
Radha Krishnan committee 1948-49 (University Education Commission):
It facilitates Indianisation of education.
Starting rural universities, on the pattern of Jamia Millia Islamia, which was established in Okhla village
Delhi.
Twelve years of pre-university educational courses.
Emphasis was to be on subjects like agriculture, commerce, education, engineering, technology,
medicine and law which would develop the country’s intellectual resources by leaps and bounds.
A university degree should not be considered as essential for the administrative services.
The working days at the university should not be less than 180 days in a year, exclusive of examination days.
Tutorials and seminars should be made a part of university activities to improve the standard of examination.
University education should be placed on the concurrent list and a uniform system of examination should be
implemented.
The salaries of teachers should be raised.
A University Grants Commission should be set up to regulate and finance the universities.
University Grants Commission 1953:
The University Grants Commission (UGC) came into existence on 28th December, 1953 and became a
statutory Organization of the Government of India by an Act of Parliament in 1956, for the
coordination, determination and maintenance of standards of teaching, examination and research in
university education.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture - 16
Revolts Before 1857
2
Civil Rebellions, Tribal Movement, Peasant Movements & Sepoy Mutinies (1757-1856):
Introduction:
Post Battle of Plassey in 1757, the political control of the East India Company consolidated.
The Company gained in the political sphere and it became imperative to introduce and implement
policies in the fields of land revenue, law and order, and set-up an administration.
Implementation of such policies created turmoil in the Indian society and led to changes.
Company’s main aim was to utilise the resources of India for the development of England.
To achieve this East India Company had created dislocation in the socio-cultural, economic
and political life of the people. Some of the changes in Indian economy brought during this
period were:
Promotion of British manufactured goods in Indian markets leading to destruction of
Indian handloom and handicraft industries.
Huge transfer of wealth from India to England (Drain of Wealth).
British Land Revenue Settlements, a heavy burden of new taxes, eviction of peasants
from their lands, encroachment on tribal lands. growth and strengthening of
exploitation in rural society along with the growth of intermediary revenue collectors
and tenants and money-lenders.
Expansion of British revenue administration over tribal territories leading to the loss of
tribal people's hold over agricultural and forest land.
The subsequent turmoil led to an outbreak of rebellion in different parts of the country.
3
Rebellions were not confined to the later period of the British Empire but were a constant feature
of it from its very beginning, culminating in the Revolt of 1857.
Impact:
The appropriation of peasants’ surplus by the company and its agents, the increasing burden of
taxes made the peasants completely dependent on the mercy of the revenue intermediaries and
officials, the merchants and the money-lenders.
The destruction of indigenous industry led to migration of large-scale workers from industry to
agriculture. The pressure on land increased but the land revenue and agricultural policy of the
government allowed little scope for the improvement of Indian agriculture.
Reason for these Uprising:
Zamindars and Poligars: They were antagonised as they lost their land and sources of revenue
due to English.
Power: These Zamindars were also deprived of the power (eg. policing, judge) they used to
enjoy earlier. The power now went to government officials.
Artisans: The British destroyed the Indian handicraft industry. Due to this a large number of
artisans lost their jobs and faced economic distress.
Antagonism: Replacement of Kings and Princes by Colonial Government impoverished the
artisans as they lost their traditional Patrons. This antagonised them.
Priests: Priests, pandits and maulvis were dependent on zamindars, princes and feudal lords. Fall
of these classes directly affected the livelihood of priests.
Foreign character of the British Rule: It always kept hurting the pride of natives.
Civil Rebellion:
The resistance against the British rule which took place before the 1857 can be broadly classified
into four major types:
Civil Rebellion:
It includes those classes of uprisings which were led by the deposed native rulers, their
descendants, former zamindars, land lords, poligars (Land holders in South India), and
religious leaders.
The mass support for the movement used to come from: Peasants (exploited for rent),
Artisans who lost their sources of income, Soldiers who were discriminated against and
mistreated.
4
Poligars:
Feudal title for a class of territorial administrative and military governors appointed by the
Nayaka rulers of South India (notably Vijayanagara Empire, Madurai Nayakas and the
Kakatiya dynasty) during the 16th-18th centuries.
Peasant Movement:
It was protests against evictions, increase in rent of land and moneylenders’ greedy ways.
Its aim was to achieve rights for peasants among other things
Tribal Uprising:
The tribals had been living peacefully and in harmony with nature for hundreds of years.
When the British came and introduced many changes in their way of life and also introduced
outsiders into their turf. This reduced them to the status of labourers and debtors from
masters of their own land.
The uprisings were basically against this unwelcome intrusion and a fight for their
independence.
5
Prominent leaders: Majnu Shah, Chirag Ali, Musa Shah, Bhawani Pathak and Debi
Chaudhurani.
Equal participation of Hindus and Muslims was an important feature of the revolt.
Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay wrote 2 novels referring to them in Anandmath 1881 and
Devi Chaudhurani.
Revolt in Midnapore and Dhalbhum (1766-74):
Chuar Rebellion rose several times in the context of famine and land revenue demands
In 1760 British captured Midnapore.
The bringing in of new colonial rule by the company destroyed the cordial relationship between
the Zamindars and the ryots.
In case of conflict between ryots and English, the Zamindars sided with the ryots.
Important leaders: Damodar Singh, Jagannath Dhal.
Revolt of Moamarias (1769-99):
Moamaries: Low caste peasants inspired by the teachings of Aniruddha Deva (1553-1624)
challenged the authority of Ahom kings.
This weakened the king and others took advantage.
The king of Darrang (Krishna Narayan), assisted by his band of burkandazes (The
demolished soldiers of Muslim armies and zamindars) revolted.
Ahom king was bound to take help from the East India Company.
Maomaries made Bhatiapur their Headquarter.
Rangpur (Presently in Bangladesh) and Jorhat were the most affected regions.
Ahom kingdom survived the rebellion but got weakened and fell to British rule later.
Civil Uprisings of Gorakhpur, Basti and Bahraich (1781):
Warren Hastings in order to earn money to meet war needs against Marathas and Mysore
planned to make English officers as ijaradars (revenue farmers) in Awadh.
Major Alexander Hannay was given the izara of this region. Severe oppression and exaction in
revenue collection.
Hannay secured the izara of Bahraich and Gorakhpur to the amount of 22 Lakhs in 1 year.
Basically, it was a secret experiment of the company to see how much surplus money is available
in practice.
But Zamindars and cultivators revolted.
Later suppressed, Hannay dismissed and Izara forcibly removed.
7
1819 - 1830 he handled the estate but failed to pay the arrears retired in the favour of his son.
His son Dhananjay Bhanj Rose revolted in 1835 on British occupation of Gumsur and Kolaida as
they failed to pay the arrears.
The rebellion greatly diminished the power of the government. Though Dhananjaya died in 1835
the rebellion continued.
Russel was brought in with full discretionary powers to suppress.
Important leader Doora Bisayi was arrested and Gumsur zamindari was forfeited.
Uprisings in Palamu | Jharkhand 1800-02:
There was a crisis of agrarian landlordism and feudal system.
In 1800, Bhukhan Singh, a Chero chief rose in rebellion against landlordism and feudal system.
It took Colonel Jones two years to suppress the revolt when Bhukhan Singh died in 1802 and
subsequently, the insurrection calmed down.
Poligars’ Revolt (1795-1805):
Tinnevelly (TN) was the area of Poligars and they considered themselves independent sovereign
authorities within their respective territories.
Major centres were Tinneveli, Ramanathapuram, Sivaganga, Sivagiri, Madurai and North Arcot.
In 1781, the Nawab of Arcot gave the management and control of Tinnevelly to the East India
Company. This caused resentment among the poligars.
First Phase 1795 - 1799:
The Poligars fought against the Company was over taxation and larger political dimensions.
The English considered and treated the poligars as enemies.
Kattabomman Nayakan:
He led the insurrection.
The Company forces were defeated by Veerapandiya Kattabomman
The Company forces were finally able to defeat and Kattabomman fled into the Pudukottai
forests.
There was a betrayal by Ettappan, the Raja of Pudukottai led to the capture of Kattabomman
and was hanged in a conspicuous place.
A close associate, Subramania Pillai was also hanged and Soundara Pandian, another rebel,
brutally killed.
The Palayam of Panjalanlankurichi and the estates of five other poligars who had joined the
rebellion were confiscated and the prominent poligars executed or sent to prison.
The Second Phase 1801 – 1805 was more violent:
The Poligars imprisoned in the Fort of Palamcottah escaped. They took control over many
forts and even captured Tuticorin.
10
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 17
Revolt before 1857 - II
2
The movement aimed at removing all the un-Islamic practices that had crept into the religion under various
influences. It aimed at revitalising the true spirit of Islam.
It considered India as dar-ul-harb (land of war), to be converted into Dar-ul-Islam (land of Islam).
Initially the movement was directed against sikh but after the annexation of Punjab by the British, it was
directed against the British.
Sithana in the North-West was chosen as the base. Though founded by Syed Ahmad, the movement was led
by Syed Mir Nisar Ali popularly known as Titu Mir. Titu Mir proclaimed the British as illegitimate rulers
and declared Muslims to be the rightful owners of the empire.
Wahhabism significantly spread to Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Bengal and North West. After the death of Sayyid
Ahmad in 1831, Patna became the centre of the Wahabi movement.
The movement turned into an armed struggle during the revolt of 1857. The British undertook many measures
to suppress the Wahabis. The British called Wahabis as traitors and rebels. Military exercises were conducted
against the Wahabis and the British succeeded to subdue the movement by 1870.
Note: Syed Ahmed Barelvi not to be confused with Syed Ahmed Khan (Aligarh Movement).
Kuka Movement (1840):
It was established in Western Punjab by Bhagat Jawahar Mal (also known as Sian Saheb) in 1840.
A significant movement leader after him was Baba Ram Singh (Namdhari Sikh sect was created by him).
The movement was converted from a religious purity campaign to a political campaign after the British took
over Punjab.
The Kuka Movement made the people aware of their serfdom and bondage. It evoked the feelings of self-
respect and sacrifice for the country. Within a few years, the followers of the Kuka Movement increased
manifold.
They called for a boycott of British educational institutions and laws established by them. They were rigid
in their clothing and wore only hand-spun white attire. The Kuka followers actively propagated civil
disobedience.
Surat Salt Agitation (1844):
The raising of salt duty in 1844 caused great discontent among the people.
Salt tax was raised from 50 paise to 1 Rupee.
The anti-government spirit turned into a strong anti-British spirit, even some Europeans were attacked.
To face with the popular Revolt, the government withdrew the additional salt levy.
Similarly in 1848, the government decision to introduce Bengal standard weights and measures had to be
withdrawn against the peoples determined bid to resolve to boycott and passive resistance.
Kolhapur and Sawantwadi Revolt:
The hardships caused by the administrative organisations in the Kolhapur state after 1844 caused deep
resentment.
The Gadkari is the hereditary military class in which garrisoned Maratha forts were disbanded. Faced with the
spectre of unemployment they rose in Revolt and occupied the forts of Samangad and Bhudargad.
Similar discontent causes the Revolt in Sawantwadi.
Several legal regulations were issued by the East India Company to put the area under control.
5
The rebels formed a government of their own, stopped payments of revenue to the existing government
and levied 'insurrection charges'/dhing kharcha to meet the expenses of the rebellion.
Both Hindus and Muslims fought side by side in the insurrection. Ultimately the government's armed forces
took control of the situation and suppressed the revolt.
The Khurda Uprising 1817:
Khurda, a small kingdom built up in the late 16th century in the south-eastern part of Odisha, was a populous
and well-cultivated territory consisting of 105 garhs, 60 large and 1109 small villages at the beginning of the
19th century.
Its king, Raja Birakishore Dev had to earlier give up the possession of four parganas, the superintendence of
the Jagannath Temple and the administration of fourteen garjats (Princely States) to the Marathas under
compulsion.
His son and successor, Mukunda Dev II was greatly disturbed with this loss of fortune.
During the Anglo-Maratha conflict, he had entered into negotiations with the British to get back his lost
territories and the rights over the Jagannath Temple.
After the occupation of Odisha in 1803, the British showed no inclination to oblige him on either score.
Consequently, in alliance with other feudatory chiefs of Odisha and secret support of the Marathas, he tried to
assert his rights by force.
This led to his deposition and annexation of his territories by the British.
As a matter of consolation, he was only given the rights of management of the Jagannath Temple with a
grant amounting to a mere one-tenth of the revenue of his former estate and his residence was fixed at Puri.
This unfair settlement commenced an era of oppressive foreign rule in Odisha, which paved the way for a
serious armed uprising in 1817.
British policies bitterly affected the lives of the ex-militia of the state, the Paiks.
The severity of the measure was compounded on account of an unreasonable increase in the demand of
revenue and also the oppressive ways of its collection.
Consequently, there was large-scale desertion of people from Khurda between 1805 and 1817.
Yet, the British went for a series of short-term settlements, each time increasing the demands, not recognising
either the productive capacity of the land or the paying capacity of the ryots.
No leniency in case of natural calamities.
Lands of defaulters were sold off to scheming revenue officials or speculators from Bengal.
The hereditary Military Commander of the deposed king, Jagabandhu Bidyadhar Mahapatra Bhramarabar Rai
or Buxi Jagabandhu as he was popularly known, was one among the dispossessed land-holders.
He had in effect become a beggar, and for nearly two years survived on voluntary contributions from the
people of Khurda before deciding to fight for their grievances as well as his own.
Over the years, what had added to these grievances were:
The introduction of sicca rupee (silver currency) in the region,
The insistence on payment of revenue in the new currency,
The unprecedented rise in the prices of food-stuff and salt, which had become far-fetched following the
introduction of salt monopoly because of which the traditional salt makers of Odisha were deprived of
making salt,
7
The auction of local estates in Calcutta, which brought in absentee landlords from Bengal to Odisha.
Besides, the insensitive and corrupt police system also made the situation worse for the armed uprising to take
a sinister shape.
The uprising was set off on 29 March 1817 as the Paiks attacked the police station and other government
establishments at Banpur killing more than a hundred men and taking away a large amount of government
money.
Soon, it's ripples spread in different directions with Khurda becoming its epicentre.
The zamindars and ryots alike joined the Paiks with enthusiasm.
Those who did not, were taken to task. A ‘no-rent campaign’ was also started.
The British tried to dislodge the Paiks from their entrenched position but failed.
On 14 April 1817, Buxi Jagabandhu, leading five to ten thousand Paiks and men of the Kandh tribe seized
Puri and declared the hesitant king, Mukunda Dev II as their ruler.
The priests of the Jagannath Temple also extended the Paiks their full support.
Seeing the situation going out of hand, the British clamped Martial Law.
The King was quickly captured and sent to prison in Cuttack with his son.
The Buxi with his close associate, Krushna Chandra Bhramarabar Rai, tried to cut off all communications
between Cuttack and Khurda as the uprising spread to the southern and the north-western parts of Odisha.
Consequently, the British sent Major-General Martindell to clear off the area from the clutches of the Paiks
while at the same time announcing rewards for the arrest of Buxi Jagabandhu and his associates.
In the ensuing operation hundreds of Paiks were killed, many fled to deep jungles and some returned home
under a scheme of amnesty.
By May 1817 the uprising was mostly contained.
However, outside Khurda it was sustained by Buxi Jagabandhu with the help of supporters like the Raja of
Kujung and the unflinching loyalty of the Paiks until his surrender in May 1825.
On their part, the British henceforth adopted a policy of ‘leniency, indulgence and forbearance’ towards the
people of Khurda.
The price of salt was reduced and necessary reforms were made in the police and the justice systems.
Revenue officials found to be corrupt were dismissed and former land-holders were restored to their lands.
The son of the king of Khurda, Ram Chandra Dev III was allowed to move to Puri and take charge of the
affairs of the Jagannath Temple with a grant of rupees twenty-four thousand.
In sum, it was the first such popular anti-British armed uprising in Odisha, which had a far reaching effect on
the future of British administration in that part of the country. To merely call it a ‘Paik Rebellion’ will thus
be an understatement.
PW Web/App: https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture - 18
Tribal Revolts
2
Tribal Revolts
Moplah Uprising:
❖ Moplahs in Malabar revolted against hike in revenue, oppression by officials and reduction in field size.
❖ Between 1836-54, they rebelled 22 times. However, none of them became successful.
❖ Note: The second Moplah revolt occurred in the 1920s during the non-cooperation movement.
Tribal Uprisings:
Some were Hunters and Gatherers:
❖ Some tribal groups lived by hunting animals and gathering forest produce.
❖ They exchanged goods of their need in return for their valuable forest produce, e.g., rice and grains or
they bought goods by small earnings they had.
❖ They used to do odd jobs in nearby villages.
➢ Khonds:
Tribal Uprisings:
❖ These were the most frequent and most violent of all uprisings.
❖ The Tribal uprisings in Colonial India can be broadly classified into two parts:
1. Mainland Tribal Uprisings.
2. Frontier Tribal Revolt - In North- East
❖ Shifting agriculture was curbed, Reserved forests were set up and restrictions were imposed on grazing.
All these combined to aggravate the misery of tribals.
❖ Exploitation at the hands of police, traders and money lenders added to their misery.
❖ Tribals had their own laws and customs. The imposition of general laws on them caused huge resentment.
❖ Intrusion of Christian Missionaries into their customs and tradition was also a major cause of resentment
among tribals.
5
Tilka Manjhi:
❖ He was the revolutionary freedom fighter and tribal leader of Jharkhand.
❖ First Adivasi leader from Paharia (Hill Peoples) Community.
❖ During the severe famine 1770 people were dying of hunger. To save people, Tilka Manjhi looted the treasury
of the Company and distributed it among them. Many other tribes also joined the rebellion, after getting inspired
6
from this noble act of Tilka. He continued to attack the British and their sycophantic allies. From 1771 to 1784,
he never surrendered.
❖ Tilka Manjhi attacked Augustus Cleveland, who was an East India Company administrator.
❖ Bhagalpur University was renamed after him as Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University.
Bhils Uprising:
❖ The uprising took place in Khandesh or North West Maharashtra during the period of 1817-19, 1825,1831
and 1846.
❖ They were basically aboriginal tribe in the Western Ghats.
❖ They controlled the mountain passes between Deccan and the north.
❖ Famine, economic distress, and misgovernance caused them to revolt against the company’s rule in 1817-19.
The revolt was led by Sewaram.
❖ Peshwa Bajirao II and his Lieutenant Trimbakji Dandlia are accused of inciting this revolt against the company.
❖ They suffered agrarian hardship and apprehension. Also, they were suppressed by the British.
❖ They got encouraged by the British reverses in Burma war and thus revolted in 1825. After a short span of
time the revolt erupted again in 1831 and 1846.
❖ Again in 1913, Govind Guru helped the Bhils of south Rajasthan to organise themselves against the British.
Koli:
❖ Kolis reside in the Sahyadri Hills of Gujarat-Maharashtra. Mostly concentrated in Ahmednagar district.
❖ The Koli uprising took place in the years 1824, 1829, 1839, 1844-48.
❖ Kolis were living in the neighbourhood and they were the rivals of Bhils.
❖ They were against the imposition of British rule and dismantlement of the forts of the Koli tribes.
❖ There was widespread unemployment under the Britishers.
❖ The revolt was finally suppressed.
Kol Uprising:
❖ The Kol Uprising erupted in the Chotanagpur & Singhbhum region during 1831-32.
❖ They had independent power for centuries but with the British penetration and application of British laws,
soon Raja of Chotanagpur started evicting tribal peasants and gave land to outsiders for higher rent.
❖ The primary reason behind such eviction was large scale transfer of lands from Kol to the British.
❖ The headmen to Hindu, Sikhs and Muslims farmers and money lenders who were oppressive and demanded
heavy taxes. [Outsiders = sud]
❖ Their plea for justice was unheard.
❖ In 1831, under the leadership of Buddho Bhagat, Kol rebels killed and burnt a thousand of outsiders’
properties. Wiped off the Raj from Chotanagpur.
❖ Their revolt was suppressed by large scale military action.
7
➢ Prominent leaders were Madhab Singh, Raja Mohan Singh, Lachman Singh of Dulma, zamindar of
Juriah
✓ 1768: Jagannath Singh: Zamindars of Ghatsila
✓ 1771: Shyam Ganjan of Dhadka, Subla Singh of Kaliapal and Dubraj
✓ 1798: Durjon Singh, zamindar of Raipur
➢ There were disturbances till 1800. However, the British suppressed the revolt through use of force.
❖ Later Birsa also spent some time in the company of a prominent Vaishnav teacher, influenced by his many
ideas.
❖ Reforming the tribal society was the main aim of his movement.
❖ He told the Mundas to give up drinking liquor, clean their village, and stop believing in witchcraft and
sorcery.
❖ In 1895, Birsa talked of a golden age -a satyug (the age of truth), urged his followers to recover that past,
lived a good life, constructed embankments, tapped natural springs, planted trees and orchards, practised
cultivation to earn their living.
❖ Munda Raj - The political aim of the Birsa movement was to drive out missionaries, moneylenders, Hindu
landlords, and the government and set up a Munda Raj with Birsa at its head.
❖ The causes of this misery were the land policies of the British, Hindu landlords and moneylenders taking
over their land, and missionaries criticising their traditional culture.
❖ As the movement spread, the British arrested Birsa in 1895, convicted him on charges of rioting and jailed
him for two years.
❖ In 1897, he was released and again he urged the tribals to destroy “Ravana” (dikus and the Europeans)
and establish a kingdom under his leadership.
❖ They attacked police stations and churches, and raided the property of moneylenders and zamindars.
❖ They raised the white flag as a symbol of Birsa Raj.
❖ In 1900, Birsa died of cholera and the movement came to an end.
❖ This movement was significant in:
1. Colonial government introduced laws so that the land of the tribals could not be easily taken over by
dikus.
2. The tribal people got the capacity to protest against injustice and express their anger against colonial
rule.
Koya Revolt:
❖ They inhabited the eastern Godavari tract.
❖ They revolted in 1803, 1840, 1845, 1858, 1861, 1862, and in 1872 (under Tomma Sora).
❖ The reasons for their uprising were oppression by moneylenders and police, new regulations, denial of
customary rights over forest.
10
Khasi Uprising:
❖ They reside in the Khasi Hills of Assam and Meghalaya and revolted against the British in 1829-32.
❖ The Khasi uprising was led by Tirat Singh and Bar Manik.
❖ The British had occupied The Hills between Khasi and Jaintia and were planning to build a road connecting to
Sylhet.
❖ A large number of outsiders were brought to complete the project.
❖ The ruler of Nunklow, Tirat Singh resented the occupation of Jantia and Garo by the British.
❖ He revolted by organising Khasi, Garo, khamptis, Singphos.
❖ The movement was suppressed in 1833.
Later Revolts:
Bhills:
❖ Bhils revolted in the region of Banswara, Suthi Dungarpur-Rajasthan in 1913.
❖ The revolt was led by Govind Guru.
❖ The revolt began as a temperance and purification movement and developed into a movement for Bhil Raj.
❖ The revolt was suppressed by British armed intervention.
Urban Revolts:
❖ The Calcutta Bhadralok raised the issue of Santhals.
❖ There were Grain riots in 1823-38 against the monopoly of grain dealers and British officials.
❖ Helping them in Western India and Delhi.
❖ There were Rice riots in 1806-1858 in Vellore & South India. There was also a revolt in Vellore against the
threats to convert to Christianity.
❖ There were revolts by Artisans groups at Calcutta in 1789 Calcutta and at Surat in 1790 to 1800.
❖ During the phase of 1809 – 1818 Rohilkhand and Bengal also witnessed such revolts.
13
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 19
Revolt of 1857
2
Revolt of 1857
Sepoys Mutiny:
The East India Company needed a large Army to pursue territorial increase in India.
Its demand for recruits increases its plan for expansion outside the boundaries of India and for Imperial
purposes to check.
However, the sepoys found that the pay allowances and terms of services as they conquered more and more
territories for the master decreased.
They shared all the discontent and grievances social, religious and economic that affected the civilians.
Development of Education:
HISTORY OF SEPOY MUTINY
A sepoy mutiny broke out in Bengal the British suppressed it, blowing away 30 sepoys
1764
from canon.
1806 The sepoy at Vellore mutinied but they were crushed.
1824 The 47th regiment at Barrackpore refused to go to Burma by sea-route.
1844 Seven battalions revolted on the question of salaries and Batta.
29th March 1857 Mangal Pandey, was hanged for firing on senior officers at Barrackpore in Bengal.
The sepoys of the 3rd Native Cavalry stationed at Meerut revolted on the issue of the
10th March 1857
greased cartridges and hence the revolt of 1857 started.
Vellore Mutiny 1806:
In 1805, General Sir John Craddock, who was the Commander-in-Chief of the Madras Army, ordered a
change in the army's uniform that hurt the sentiments of both Hindu as well as Muslim soldiers.
Hindus were prohibited from putting religious marks on their forehead.
Muslims were forced to trim their moustaches and beards. Instead of the turban they were used to
wearing, they were asked to wear a round hat usually associated with Europeans.
This naturally angered the soldiers. Those who protested were punished with whipping and sent out of the
army.
Another trigger point was the defeat of Tipu Sultan in 1799 and after his death, his wives, children and
servants were confined to the city of Vellore.
People were angry about the disrespect shown by the British to the erstwhile ruler's sons. An attack was
planned.
Surprise Strike:
Vellore Fort that housed battalions of the British and Madras Infantry.
That day was the wedding of one of Tipu Sultan's daughters.
3
Soon after midnight, around 500 Indian soldiers broke into the fort and murdered more than 100
unsuspecting soldiers who were sleeping.
The outnumbered British were taken by surprise and they fled.
In a fiercely symbolic gesture, the rebels took down the Union Jack (the flag of the U.K.) and replaced it
with the flag of Tipu Sultan.
They then declared Tipu Sultan's second son as the king. A lack of clear leadership, however, caused the
rebellion to lose focus beyond this point.
Meanwhile, the British started fighting back. Led by Sir Rollo Gillespie, a team of soldiers approached the
fort.
They blew open its doors and shot dead 100 Indian soldiers who were still inside. A total of around 350
Indian sepoys were killed in the counter-attack.
Tipu Sultan's family was eventually shifted to Calcutta. The revolt was suppressed within a day.
The Revolt of 1857:
Pattern of the Rebellion:
Rumours and Prophecies:
Rumours and prophecies played an important part in
moving people into action during the Revolt of 1857.
A rumour spread swiftly that the new cartridges
introduced by Britishers were greased with the fat
of cows and pigs which would pollute their castes and
religion.
The rumours about the British mixing the bone dust
of cows and pigs into the flour led people to avoid
touching the flour.
Fear and suspicion about the British wanting to
convert Indians to Christianity.
The rumour about the British rule coming to an end on
the centenary of the Battle of Plassey also reinforced
the call for a revolt.
Indians believed the British policies to reform Indians
targeted their long-cherished customs and practices.
The activities of Christian missionaries also created doubt and discomfort.
The annexations on the pretext of the Doctrine of Lapse also made the people suspicious of British
intentions.
Circulation of chapattis started (The Chapati Movement).
4
John Sullivan – “The trade languishes, the capital decays, the people are impoverished, the English men
flourishes and acts like a sponge, drawing up riches from the banks of the Ganges and squeezing them down upon
the banks of the Thames.”
5
According to the alliance, the Nawab was required to disband his military force & allow the British to
position their troops within the kingdom and act in accordance with the advice of the British Resident
now attached to the court.
Thus, the Nawab became dependent on the British.
The British were keen to acquire Awadh as its soil was good for growing indigo and cotton and was
ideally located for trade.
By early 1850s, major areas of Maratha land, doab, Punjab, Carnatic and Bengal were captured.
Annexation of Awadh would complete the territorial annexation by the British.
It was annexed on the grounds of maladministration.
"The life was gone out of the body"
Annexation of Awadh resulted in dissatisfaction and disappointment among Indian hearts.
Nawab Wajid Ali Shah was dethroned and exiled to Calcutta.
The British wrongly assumed that the Nawab Wajid Ali Shah was an unpopular ruler; on the contrary he
was widely loved.
"Angrez Bahadur ain, mulk lai linho" song became popular in memory of nawab i.e., Jan-i-Alam.
Dissolution of court and culture of nawab which made many artists losing their livelihood.
Firangi Raj and the end of a world:
In Awadh, the revolt became an expression of popular resistance to an alien order.
The annexation dispossessed the taluqdars of the region.
Before this, taluqdars maintained armed retainers, built forts, and enjoyed a degree of autonomy.
Britishers, unwilling to tolerate the power of the taluqdars, disarmed and destroyed their forts after
annexation.
Britishers introduced the land revenue policy of Summary Settlement in 1856.
This resulted in reduction of land under taluqdars from 67% to 38%.
British land revenue officers believed that by replacing taluqdars with actual owners of the soil would
reduce exploitation of peasants
However, this didn't happen as revenue flows for the state increased but the burden of demand on the
peasants did not decline.
Over assessment of revenue demand by officials.
Dispossession of taluqdars-breakdown of whole social order.
Peasants were now directly exposed to the harsh revenue policies of the British and could no longer avail
loans in times of hardship or crop failure.
Resistance during 1857 in Awadh was carried out by taluqdars and their peasants.
7
Many taluqdars joined Begum Hazrat Mahal (the wife of the Nawab) to fight against Britishers.
Grievances of the peasants were carried by sepoys due to the majority of sepoys belonging to Awadh.
Awadh was called "the nursery of the Bengal Army".
Relationship of the sepoys with their superior white officers was changing. In the1820s both maintained
cordial relations.
Post 1840s, officers developed a sense of superiority and discriminated against sepoys racially. Abuse and
physical violence became common.
The close links existed between the sepoys and the rural world of North India.
Large no. of sepoys of Bengal Army belonged to the villages of Awadh and eastern Uttar Pradesh.
Changes and the threats perceived among sepoys and their family were quickly transmitted to the sepoy lines
and further to villages
When the sepoys took up arms they were joined by the peasants.
Socio-Religious Causes:
The attempts at Socio-religious reform were seen by a large section of the population as interference in the
social and religious domains of Indian society by outsiders.
The introduction of the English education in preference to the Indian education, the abolition of sati, the
change in the Hindu law of inheritance, the abolition of female infanticide and the permission of
widow remarriage perturbed the orthodox mind who now became alarmed. They began to fear that the
Indian religion and purity would be polluted by the civilization of the mlecchas.
Railways had been introduced in the country by Lord Dalhousie. The people of different religions and castes
had to sit in the same compartments and on the same seats. This was quite intolerable for the orthodox
Hindus who considered it a serious inroad upon their pious religion.
It has been a wide practice with the conquerors to degrade the conquered, disrupt their social set-up,
condemn their religion and impoverish them with a view to attracting them to their own religion, thoughts
and practices.
The English authorities encouraged their clergy to come to India as missionaries and to affect a large-scale
conversion of the Indian people to Christianity. Even in the military the bribes, promotions and rewards
were used to convert the sepoys to Christianity.
In fact, the English attempts at conversion were as systematic as the policy of territorial aggression, though
this work had been entrusted to private missionaries mostly.
The Hindu Law of Inheritance that stood in the way of conversion was modified and all the people of India
felt that their religion was in danger. For E.g., Religious Disability Act, 1856, modified Hindu customs
declaring that by changing religion a person is not debarred from inheriting ancestral property. The result
was great discontent and resentment.
8
Dalhousie's refusal to grant adoptions to the rulers of the states who died without any natural male heir added
fuel to the fire. A son, whether natural or adopted, is a religious necessity for a Hindu.
The Hindu shastras define no difference between a natural and an adopted son. Dalhousie's doctrine of
lapse was, thus, taken as a serious inroad upon the Hindu religion by the Indian princes and the
people.
Besides, the confiscation of religious grants and the naked condemnation of the Hindu and Muslim religions
by the English missionaries were greatly resented by the Indian masses.
Influence of Events outside India: There were certain events which coincided with the 1857 revolt in
which British suffered serious losses like - First Afghan War (1838-42), Punjab Wars (1845-49),
Crimean Wars (1854-56), Santhal Rebellion (1855-57). They had psychological repercussions. It was felt
that the British could be defeated.
Discontent among Sepoys:
The causes mentioned above were quite favourable for the revolt, yet nothing worthwhile could have been
achieved until and unless the Indian sepoys had joined it. Fortunately, or unfortunately the army became
dissatisfied and the situation became really dangerous for the English.
The British forces had suffered serious reverses in the first Afghan War, which broke the spell of British
invincibility.
The low salaries of the sepoys and the bad treatment that they were meted out enraged them. They began to
feel dissatisfied.
The certain regulations introduced by Lord Canning intensified the feelings of resentment among the Indian
sepoys. (Post Office Act 1854) He made them pay regular postage for all their letters which were free
previously.
The sepoys declared unfit for foreign service were not given pensions. Thus, the loyalty of the Indian sepoys
began to disappear.
Besides the glaring disproportion between the numbers of British and native soldiers in India, the troops
were not properly distributed. Almost all the strategic points were in the hands of the native sepoys.
Between Allahabad and Calcutta there was only one British regiment at Dinapore while places like Delhi and
Allahabad were in the hands of Indian sepoys. This favourable situation encouraged the Indian sepoys very
much and individual revolts began to spring up.
The army was invariably headed and commanded by English men, but the real strength of the Company's
forces lay in the Indian regiments.
Upon this, the General Services Enlistment Act 1856 of Lord Canning fanned the flame as it required all
the new recruits to serve anywhere in India and abroad.
9
Immediate Cause:
Lastly, the introduction of the Enfield Rifle served as a spark to open the mutiny. The cartridges' which were
used in these rifles were greased with cow's/pig's fat. This was highly objectionable to the Hindus and the
Muslims alike.
Moreover, the soldiers had to bite them with their teeth before loading their guns. So long as the Indian
soldiers did not know about this fact, they used these cartridges. Encouraged by this, English setup factories
in India to manufacture these cartridges.
The sepoys of Dum Dum, a cantonment near Barrackpore, where a factory of cartridges was set up, came
to know of the fact and a current of indignation ran through the rank and file of the army. The Hindus and the
Muslims considered it a deliberated inroad upon their religions.
The country had already reached the ignition point and the greased cartridges precipitated the crisis.
Behrampur (West Bengal) 2nd Feb 1857: 19th Bengal infantry Soldiers refused the new Enfield Rifles.
Barrackpore: Mangal Pandey (29th March 1857) went a step ahead and fired upon the sergeant major of
his unit. He was arrested and executed and his regiment disbanded.
The Revolt Starts:
The revolt began in Meerut on 10 May, 1857.
It soon spreaded to Punjab, Narmada region, Bihar and Rajputana.
90 men of the 3rd Native Cavalry refused to use greased cartridges.
85 of these soldiers were disbanded and imprisoned for 10 years.
This sparked a mutiny among soldiers in Meerut who released the imprisoned soldiers, killed their officers,
unfurled the banner of revolt and set for Delhi.
In Delhi, Local infantry of Delhi joined the infantry coming from Meerut.
Killed European officers including the political agent Simon Fraser, and seized the city.
Bahadur Shah Zafar was proclaimed as the emperor of India.
By recognising Bahadur Shah as emperor, the sepoys transformed a soldier's mutiny into an All-India Revolt.
It led to rulers and chiefs (Rani Laxmi Bai, Nana Sahib) from different parts of India taking part in the revolt
by proclaiming their loyalty to Bahadur Shah.
What the Rebels Wanted?
The Vision of Unity:
The rebel proclamations in 1857 appealed to people to join the rebels.
The rebellion was seen as a war in which both Hindus and Muslims had equally to lose or gain.
Ishtahars issued reflect back pre-British Hindu-Muslim past and coexistence of different communities
earlier.
In Bareilly in western Uttar Pradesh, in December 1857, the British spent Rs 50,000 to incite the Hindu
population against the Muslims but failed.
10
Lucknow: Leader was Begum Hazrat Mahal. Her son Birjis Qadir was proclaimed as Nawab and a regular
administration was organised with offices shared equally between Hindus and Muslims. British resident Sir
Henry Lawrence was killed.
Bareilly: Leader was Khan Bahadur, a descendent of the former ruler of Rohilkhand.
Bihar: Leader here was Kunwar Singh, a zamindar of Jagdishpur. He was deprived of his estate by the East
India Company.
Faizabad: Leader here was Maulvi Ahmadullah, a native of Madras.
Jhansi: Led by Rani Laxmibai. The most outstanding leader of the revolt. Lord Dalhousie had refused to
allow her adopted son to take the throne following the Doctrine of Lapse.
She gave the battle cry: "Main apni jhansi nahi dungi"
Tantia Tope, a close associate of Nana sahib joined her after the loss of Kanpur.
Sacrifices:
Sacrifices were made by the common people and it was also immense:
Shah Mal: A local villager in Pargana Baraut (U.P) organised peasants from 84 villages to rise against
the Britishers. Attacked Government building, sent supplies to sepoys in Delhi and cut all communication
link between British headquarter and Meerut.
He set up headquarters in the bunglow of the irrigation department, which turned into a “hall of justice”,
resolving disputes and passing judgements.
Lines of Communication:
Reason for the similarity in the pattern of the Revolt:
The planning and coordination between different places.
First, 7th Awadh Irregular Cavalry refused to accept the new cartridges.
Sepoys or their emissaries moved from one station to another, planning about the rebellion.
Panchayats occurred at Kanpur sepoy lines every night.
During movement from one place to other, sepoys motivated and encouraged others to join the rebellion.
As in case of captain Hersey of Awadh:
The 41st native infantry stationed at the same place persuaded Indian subordinates of Hersey.
To either kill him or deliver him to prison.
Sepoys lived in lines and shared a common lifestyle.
Despite being of different castes & culture they decided and discussed their future together.
The sepoys were the makers of their own rebellion.
Leadership was not only hailed to members of royal family, ordinary men & women and religious leaders
were also given leadership at some places:
Meerut – A fakir was considered the leader of the rebel.
Lucknow – Many religious leaders and self-styled prophets gave direction to the destruction of British
rule.
Borout, U.P. – Shah Mal mobilised the villagers of pargana.
Singhbhum (Chotanagpur) – Gonoo, a tribal cultivator, became a rebel leader of the Kol tribals of the
region.
12
The Britishers used military power, broke unity among Indians by shaking hands with landlords.
Rebel landlords were dispossessed and loyal were rewarded.
Many landlords died out of starvation and illness.
Failure of the Mutiny:
The Indian Mutiny, though a great effort, could not succeed, the fall of Delhi and the arrest of Emperor
Bahadur Shah marked the beginning of the suppression of the Mutiny.
Lack of Arms and Ammunitions:
The mutineers were very weak in equipment. Though the mutineers were mostly soldiers, yet they
could not expect any fresh supply of arms.
The English had adequate equipment as they had several ordnance factories working for themselves.
Besides, they could get arms and other equipment from England also.
The mutineers lacked discipline while the English forces were perfectly disciplined. This lack of
discipline and equipment was a dominant cause of the failure of the mutiny.
Absence of Leadership:
The mutineers, though they were burning with fervour against the British, had no good generals to
command themselves.
The mutineers were generally sepoys. The leaders of the revolt like Rani Lakshmi Bai, Nana Sahib
were brave but lacked the military genius that makes good generals. On the other hand, the English
had competent generals like Campbell, Nicholson and Outram.
The mutineers needed Baburs and Shivajis to command them, but unfortunately, they had none.
Emperor Bahadur Shah was too old to take the field. Though Bakht Khan and Tatya Tope were good
generals, yet they were commoners and the princes, aristocrats refused to obey them.
The British were able to control an efficient and wide-spread system of telegraphs and postal
communication.
Absence of Common Ideal:
The common ideal of the restoration of Bahadur Shah to the throne of his ancestors had inspired the
mutineers in the beginning, but with the fall of Delhi and capture of the emperor, this ideal
disappeared.
This absence of the common ideal dealt a death blow to the mutiny. Now the only ideal before the
mutineers was the destruction of the East India Company.
This ideal was of a negative nature and could not affect the unity which the presence of the emperor
had done.
The English now were able to sow the seeds of division among the mutineers by inciting the Hindus
and the Muslims against each other. So, the mutiny assumed the shape of individual efforts and
exploits and hence its failure.
Mutual Differences among leaders
Though all the forces of revolt were following the same policy, yet they had their mutual dissensions
which did not let them combine in action.
The numerous units of the mutineers remained as separate armies and could not fight as one collective
whole.
The English siege of Delhi which continued so long stands evidence to this fact. Had the mutineers
been able to sink their mutual differences and combine in their action, the history would have been
altogether different.
Personal jealousies and individual leadership stood in the way of concerted action and hence the
suppression of the revolt.
14
The Doctrine of Lapse was totally discarded. The rulers could have no mutual relations without the British
mediation. A ceiling was fixed for the forces of the Indian states.
The government promised not to interfere in the internal affairs of the state except in case of utter
misgovernment.
The princes who had been helpful to the British in the Mutiny were awarded honorary titles and gifts of
money and land.
The Nizam of Hyderabad was given back some of his territory annexed in 1853. His debt of $500,000
was written off.
The rulers of Nepal, Gwalior, Bhopal, Baroda and Rajputana were amply rewarded. Many of them
were created ‘Knights.’
Nana Sahib, the adopted son of the 1st Peshwa, was fighting for his title of Peshwaship. He ran to the jungles
of Nepal never to return again. Thus, the title of Peshwaship came to an end. A similar fate met the house
of the Mughals. With the death of Bahadur Shah extinguished the line of the emperors.
With the transfer of all powers of the Company to the Crown, the forces of the Company had also been
transferred from the Company’s service to that of the Crown. A portion of the British forces protested against
this transfer as it had been affected without their consent.
They demanded their discharge. Some cantonments at Allahabad, Meerut etc. made serious demonstrations
and there appeared a danger of serious collisions. So, the government was forced to discharge all who
desired so. This mutiny decreased the number of British armies by 10,000 soldiers.
The difficulties of the Indian Mutiny and the White Mutiny necessitated a reconstruction of the army.
The reconstruction which followed was based on two major changes. One was concerned with the future
organisation of the army while the other was related to the proportion between the Indian and the British
troops.
It was decided that this proportion should not exceed 2: 1 and that the field and artillery should be
exclusively in the hands of the Europeans.
The question of the organisation of the army gave rise to a controversy between the Indian and the Home
authorities. The local European troops, and the King’s forces were two wings of the European forces.
While the Indian authorities wanted a majority of local European troops, then home authorities wanted to
amalgamate the two. At last, the amalgamation was affected in 1860 which gave a good sense of solidarity to
the British troops.
Though the mutiny had been suppressed, yet it resulted in an alarming state of finances. The English had lost
the goodwill of the Indian masses and the reorganisation of the finances was not an easy job.
This disorganisation of the finances caused a burden to the Indian people. The Indian debt increased
heavily and the Viceroy was forced to seek the advice of experts on this point.
The mutiny drew the interest and attention of the government from external affairs to internal development.
It now began to think of ways and means for the internal reconstruction of India.
The period from 1861 to 1899 is marked with an outstanding interest for the development of the
administrative policy of the government.
Though this policy always aimed at the reconstruction that could develop India into a storehouse for raw
materials as well as a market for the manufactured goods, yet the period was comparatively calm.
The control of the Secretary of State for India increased over the Indian affairs than it had been under the
Board of Control.
Red Sea Cable was installed in 1870 which brought London and Simla within a few minutes’ reach of each
other.
16
One indirect effect of the Indian Mutiny was the rise of extremism in Indian politics. The excesses practised
during the mutiny created serious feelings of hostility between the Indians and the English which went as far
as to influence the political thought of India.
The mutual estrangement between the two races led to an extremist attitude which manifested itself some
years later. The rise of extremist parties in India was the result of this indirect effect of the Indian Mutiny.
As mentioned above, the mutiny widened the gulf between the Indians and the Europeans.
Mere change of rulers could not remedy it. The Indians now began to think with a vengeance about the plans
and means of ending the British rule, though for the time being their hopes were dashed to the ground.
On the other hand, the Englishmen began to hate the Indians still more. There was no hope of confidence
being restored.
The Mutiny gave rise to a serious gulf between the Hindus and the Muslims. It was, in reality, due to the
incitement by the English given to both the communities during the Mutiny with a view to weakening their
might.
The Muslims had participated more keenly in the Mutiny than the Hindus. Moreover, it was mostly the
Hindu princes who had supported the British.
The Sikhs of Punjab had conquered Delhi and Lucknow. Thus, the Muslims came to have a grudge against
the Hindus. Though both the impressions were untrue, yet the gulf between the two went on widening.
The English directly or indirectly encouraged this estrangement with a view to prolonging their domination
over the region.
The Muslim civilization and culture which was the culture of the rulers was progressing by leaps and
bounds. But the new masters of India gave a set-back to the Muslim civilization. Urdu was replaced by
English and the Western civilization dominated.
The Queen’s Proclamation of 1858 was marked by an assurance of religious freedom and equal treatment to
the Indians. It gave out a policy of justice, benevolence and religious tolerance and promised not to interfere
in the religious beliefs or the modes of worship of the Indians.
Significance of the Revolt:
For the British: It brought out the shortcomings prevalent in the British Administration and Army. Had the
revolt not happened, these shortcomings would have never come to the forefront.
For the Indians: The revolt imparted a major lesson to Indians to carry out the future course of freedom
struggle.
It brought out the future grievances of soldiers and the commoners.
The atrocities committed by both sides during the revolt shocked the Indian intellectuals who were
convinced not to take the route of violence in the future struggle against the British.
The sacrifices made by commoners and leaders of the revolt kept on inspiring the masses. It fuelled them
with the idea of nationalism and new energy, which was ultimately tapped by Gandhi after 1920.
Nature of the Mutiny:
Divergent Views:
British historians like Kaye, Malleson, Trevelyan, Lawrence, Holmes have painted it as ‘a mutiny’
confined to the army which did not command the support of the people at large.
Sir John Lawrence and Seeley thought it to be a Sepoy’s Mutiny and nothing more.
It is difficult to agree with L.E.R. Rees said that the Revolt was ‘a war of fanatic religionists against
Christians.’
Some English historians led by T.R. Holmes popularised the view that the Revolt of 1857 was ‘a conflict
between civilization and barbarism.’
17
Majumdar [1963], has commented, 'on the whole, it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the so-called
First National War of Independence of 1857 is neither first, nor national, nor a war of independence'.
Sir James Outram and W. Tayler described the outbreak as the result of Hindu-Muslim conspiracy.
It was a Regional specific mostly concentrated to North India.
Disunity among the Bengali middle class, Punjab, Prince.
Sepoy mutiny and civil rebellion already happened earlier.
Benjamin Disraeli, [Chancellor of exchequer, 1858, later PM in 1874 -80] described it in the House of
commons in 1857 - ‘Is it a military mutiny or is it a national revolt’.
V.D. Savarkar described it “a planned war of national independence….a war fought for swadharma and
swaraj”.
Karl Marx 1857 described it as “what he [John Bull] considers a military mutiny is in truth a national
revolt”.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture - 20
Social Reform Movement
2
Recent Studies are inclined towards National Revolt though no concept of nation in modern sense.
Unlike earlier peasant revolts there was greater interconnection between the territories and the rebels were
open to influence from outside areas.
Common distaste for British rule brought them against the authority of the company and they became their
target of attack and pitted against the same enemy.
It was back to the old familiar order but not centralized Mughal rule.
⮚ Decentralized political order of the 18th century.
⮚ Provincial rulers with considerable autonomy.
⮚ Mughals as the source of legitimacy.
⮚ “In Memoriam” painted by Joseph Noel Paton - depicts English women and
children huddled in a circle, looking helpless and innocent, seemingly waiting for
the inevitable – dishonour, violence and death.
⮚ Represents the rebels as violent and brutish without depicting them in the picture.
⮚ In some images women were shown as heroic figures. For example in
Ms.Wheeler’s painting where she is seen defending herself against the Sepoys at
Kanpur.
⮚ Also shows a woman's battle to save the honour of Christianity from a wider
perspective (as the bible is shown lying on the floor).
Vengeance and Retribution:
⮚ Visual representations and news about the revolt resulted in anger and shocks in
Britain.
⮚ It was seen for the justice and British honour the
rebels were to be suppressed ruthlessly.
⮚ An image depicts an allegorical female figure of
justice with a sword in one hand and a shield in the
other expressing rage and desire for revenge.
⮚ Innumerable pictures and cartoons were published in
newspapers that sanctioned brutal repression and
violent reprisal.
⮚ “The British Lion’s Vengeance on the Bengal
Tiger” and "Justice” of Punch magazine were the
famous images.
The Performance of Terror:
⮚ The rebels were blown from guns, or hanged from the gallows.
⮚ Images of their execution were circulated through journals.
⮚ For example – Images of executions of Indian soldiers in Peshawar also showed their bravery.
The plight of women was horrible. The birth of a girl was unwelcome, her marriage a burden and her widow
hood inauspicious. Infanticide, child marriage, polygamy, the burning of widows etc. were interpreted as
religiously valid.
The priests exercised an overwhelming and unhealthy influence on the minds of the people. Idolatry and
polytheism helped to reinforce their position.
Various peripatetic groups were stereotyped into the colonial construct called Thugs who were believed to
have been members of a fraternity traditionally involved in robbery & ritual killings in the name of religion.
Humanism: It is a philosophical stance that emphasises the individual and social potential and agency of
human beings. It considers human beings as the starting point for serious moral and philosophical inquiry.
Starting in the 20th century, humanist movements have typically been non-religious and aligned with
secularism. Most frequently, humanism refers to a non-theistic view centered on human agency, and
a reliance on science and reason rather than revelation from a supernatural source to understand the
world.
Rationalism: It is the epistemological view that "regards reason as the chief source and test of knowledge"
or "any view appealing to reason as a source of knowledge or justification".
It is defined as a methodology or a theory "in which the criterion of the truth is not sensory but intellectual
and deductive"
Individualism: It is the belief that individual people in society should have the right to make their own
decisions, etc., rather than being controlled by the government.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
MODERN HISTORY
Lecture – 21
Social Reform Movement
II
2
➢ Education: It includes the spread of education to counter illiteracy and ignorance. Intellectual stressed
education to all sections of society and emphasis on the knowledge of science and technology.
➢ Vernacular Languages: Intellectual emphasis on spread of ideas of change propagated in vernacular
languages to get more penetration into the society and understandable to the common man.
➢ Emphasis on Rationality: Developing the rationalist critique of socio-religious reality by replacing faith
with rationality. Evaluation of socio-religious practices from the point of social utility.
➢ Role of Scripture: As priestly classes were blamed for distorting scripture knowledge, intellectuals
sought scriptural sanction.
❖ Reform through Social Work: Reformers realised that purely intellectual work would not be sufficient; it
should be aligned with social work. Contribution of Vidyasagar is a remarkable example.
▪ D.K Karve also opened a Widow’s Home in Poona to provide vocational training to high caste
widows and give them an interest in life. Karve also set up Indian Women’s University at Bombay
in 1916.
▪ B.M Mabari, M. G. Ranade, K. Natarajan were also among the prominent figures advocating
widow remarriage.
➢ Abolition of Sati: As a result of consistent efforts by reformers like Raja Rammohan Roy, the government
brought Regulation of 1829 abolishing the evil practice of Sati.
➢ Ban on Female Infanticide: The practice was highly prevalent in upper class Bengalis and Rajputs. The
Bengal Regulation Act of 1795 and 1804, declared infanticide illegal.
➢ In 1870, an Act passed to make it compulsory for parents to register the birth of all babies and also made
provision to verify the female children for some years after the birth.
➢ Curbing Child Marriage:
▪ Age of Consent Act (1891): It forbade the marriage of girls below 12 years of age.
▪ Sarda Act, 1930: Extended the marriage age to 18 for boys and 14 for girls.
Women’s Education:
❖ In 1849, JED Bethune founded the Bethune School in Calcutta for girls’ education.
❖ Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar was associated with around 35 girls’ schools and is considered a pioneer in
children’s education.
❖ During this time the Woods Dispatch, 1854 stressed the need for female education.
❖ The Swadesi, and anti-partition movement and Home Rule Movement proved to be a major liberating
experience for women who till now were mainly home centred.
❖ Since non-cooperation women participated neck to neck with men, faced lathis, picked shops and went to jails.
❖ Sarojini Naidu became the first Indian woman to be the President of Indian National Congress.
❖ Thuggee: Campaign against thuggee was initiated in the 1830s by Lord Bentinck. Thuggee Act (XXX), 1836
was passed & Thuggee Department was created for prosecuting gangs seen as perpetrating a crime in the name
of religion but its elimination proved to be a difficult task.
➢ In 1839, Sir William Sleeman as head of Department claimed that thugee had been exterminated but in
reality, he began to realise difficulty in doing this and it was just a face-saving measure.
❖ Brahmo Samaj advocated prayers, meditation and reading of Upanishads as a form of worship. It opposed
idolatry and meaningless rituals.
❖ In order to purify Hinduism, his work was based on two things: Reason and Vedas and Upanishads.
❖ He launched a crusade against the evil practice of Sati. His agitation bore fruit finally in 1829 when Lord
Bentinck enacted a law against that practice.
❖ He also launched a struggle against polygamy and the degraded condition of widows.
❖ He demanded women’s right to property.
❖ Rammohan Roy was a staunch supporter of English language and western science and learning.
❖ Contribution in Education:
➢ He aspired Indians to be benefitted from western scientific knowledge and progress. He emphasised on
fusion of knowledge from East to West.
➢ He assisted David Hare to establish Hindu College (now Presidency University) at Kolkata in 1817.
➢ He established ‘Vedanta College’ in Calcutta in which learning of both Indian and western social and
physical sciences was imparted.
➢ He also opened an English school at Calcutta.
❖ Roy’s attempt to spread modern ideas met with a strong opposition from orthodox elements like Radhakanta
Deb who formed Dharma Sabha to counter Brahmo samaj.
❖ He played an important role in building up public opinion on the political issues in the country. He discouraged
the exploitation practices of Zamindars. He advocated Indianisation of Services, freedom of press,
separation of the executive from judiciary, trial by jury and equality between Indian and European
Judges.
❖ He contributed to unite people and generated the feeling of nationalism which was completely absent in that
era through his journals, writing and debates.
❖ Enriched Bengali language by compiling a Bengali grammar book and evolving a modern elegant prose style.
❖ He was a political visionary and was highly active.
❖ He was an internationalist, libertarian and democrat in his orientation. To celebrate the success of the
Revolution in Spanish America in 1823, gave a public dinner.
❖ In 1830, he went to England as the Mughal Emperor’s representative to support his case.
❖ He died in Bristol (in 1833).
Quotes by Ram Mohan Roy (For Essay):
❖ “Just Consider How Terrible the Day of Your Death Will Be. Others Will Go On Speaking and You Will
Not Be Able to Argue Back.”
❖ “Truth and Virtue do not necessarily belong to wealth and Power and distinctions of big mansions.”
❖ “It is necessary that some change should take place in their religion.”
❖ “The greater our intercourse with European gentlemen, the greater will be our improvement in literary,
social, and political affairs.”
❖ “For wise and good men always feel disinclined to hurt those that are of much less strength than themselves.”
8
❖ Rammohan Roy launched a frontal attack on another evil of Hindu society - Casteism. He realized that the
caste system had reduced the social organism to a purely biological function and impeded growth of unity and
solidarity among the Indian people.
❖ His attitude towards religion and religious matters was utilitarian and he has been assessed as ‘a religious
Benthamite’.
❖ He judged different religions not so much from the point of view of the ‘basic truth’ in them but from their
social usefulness, his emphasis was on the ethico-religious thought common to all religions of the world. That
is why he emphasized the unity underlying all religions.
❖ His practical mind found expression in the foundation of the Brahmo Samaj which aimed at something to
which all religions could subscribe, namely the worship and adoration of the Eternal, Unsearchable and
Immutable Being, who is the Author and Preserver of the Universe’.
❖ Roy accepted British rule as a fait accompli and believed that it would work as a ‘regenerative force’ for the
advancement of India. In this matter Rammohan was a forerunner of the Indian Liberal thinkers of the 19th
century.
❖ Roy did not ask for responsible government, but did demand wide-ranging administrative reforms like a better
judicial set-up, separation of executive from judicial functions, wider share for Indians in the service and,
above all, liberty of the press.
Reforms:
Brahmo Samaj (The Society of God):
❖ Earliest modern Reform movement was founded by Raja Ram Mohan Roy and Dwarkanath Tagore in 1828.
(Initially Brahmo Sabha)
❖ He accepted the concept of one God as propounded by the Upanishads. For him God Was shapeless, invisible,
omnipresent and omnipotent, guiding the spirit of the universe and omniscient.
❖ Main objective of the brahmo Samaj: “the worship and the operation of the eternal unsearchable immutable
being Who is the author and preserver of the universe.
❖ Samaj had declared its opposition to Idol worship, Priesthood and sacrifices of any kind.
❖ Worship was performed through prayer, meditation and reading from the Upanishad.
❖ Emphasis on the “promotion of Charity, morality, piety, benevolence, virtue and strengthening of the bonds of
union between men of all religious persuasions and creed.”
❖ He never wanted to establish a new religion and was interested in purifying Hinduism only. He was a devout
Hindu.
❖ It only attracted intellectuals and educationally enlightened Bengalis of the town.
❖ Orthodox Hindus under the Radhakanta Deb organised Dharam Sabha with the object of countering the
propaganda of Brahmo Samaj
❖ With the death of Raja Ram Mohan Roy there was no guiding leader to the movement.
❖ After the death of Ram Mohan Roy, the Brahmo tradition was carried forward by Debendranath Tagore.
❖ The Brahmo ideas spread in Maharashtra where Paramhansa Sabha was founded in 1849.
❖ Paramhansa Mandali (1840), secret socio-religious group, Bombay.
❖ Brahmo Samaj centres in Madras State were opened in Madras state.
❖ In Punjab the Dayal Singh implanted Brahmo ideas by opening of Dayal Singh College at Lahore in 1910.
10
❖ He brought eminent thinkers within the fold of Samaj, which included- Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar and
Ashwini Kumar Dutt.
❖ Tagore revitalised Brahmo Samaj which started working on newer fronts like: widow remarriage, women’s
education, abolition of polygamy and improvement in ryot’s condition.
❖ He also composed selected passages from the Upanishads, which was known as Brahma Dharma.
11
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 22
Social Reform
Movement III
2
After marrying his daughter at the age of 14 some of his followers broke away, and he organised a new
society Naba Bidhan, or Nava Vidhana (“New Dispensation”) - continuing to preach a mixture of Hindu
philosophy and Christian theology.
Keshab Chandra Sen laid the foundation stone of the mandir called the Tabernacle of New Dispensation.
The newly constructed chapel was consecrated on 22nd August, 1869.
Prarthana Samaj:
The Brahmo idea spread in Maharashtra where the Paramhansa Sabha was founded in 1849.
In 1867, under the guidance of Keshab the Prarthana
Samaj was established in Bombay by Dr. Atmaram
Pandurang.
It became popular after Mahadev Govind Ranade joined.
It was spread to southern India by noted Telugu
Reformer and writer, Kandukuri Veeresalingam.
The followers of Prarthana Samaj never looked upon
themselves simply as a movement within Hinduism.
Apart from the worship of one God in western
India, the main emphasis has been on social reforms
and upon works rather than faith. They believe that
the true love of a God is in the service of God's
children. Their approach was not confrontation with
Hindu orthodoxy but they relied on education and
persuasion.
5
Ramkrishna Paramhansa:
Ramakrishna fought against caste system and orthodoxy.
He was a priest at Dakshineshwar temple of goddess Kali at Calcutta.
He practised various difficult disciplines of the Tantrik path, and attained success in all of them.
He had an observance of various elements from Tantra, Vaishnav Bhakti, and Advaita Vedanta, as well as
affinity with Christianity and Islam.
Under guidance of Totapuri, he attained Nirvikalpa Samadhi, the highest spiritual experience mentioned in
the Hindu scriptures.
He looked upon Jesus and Buddha as incarnations of God, and venerated the ten Sikh Gurus.
10
Ramkrishna Paramhansa:
Vedanta School
Self-realization (Enlightenment) Order.
Founder of Ramakrishna Order.
Philosophy of Advaita Vedanta Bhakti yoga and Tantra.
1. Vivekananda popularized the notion of involution, a term which Vivekananda probably took from
Western Theosophists, notably Helena Blavatsky.
Organisation Association:
In 1880, Narendranath Dutta (Vivekananda) joined Keshab Chandra Sen's Nava Vidhan.
Narendra became a member of a Freemasonry lodge at some point before 1884.
From 1881 to 1884, he was also active in Sen's Band of Hope, which tried to discourage youths from
smoking and drinking.
Subhas Chandra Bose wrote: “So far as Bengal is concerned, Vivekanand may be regarded as the spiritual
father of the modern national movement.”
National Youth Day in India is observed on his birthday, 12 January every year.
The day he delivered his masterful speech at the Parliament of Religions, 11 September 1893, is "World
Brotherhood Day".
Literary Work:
Bartaman Bharat, meaning "Present Day India
Sangeet Kalpataru (with Vaishnav Charan Basak)
Karma Yoga
Raja Yoga
Vedanta Philosophy: An address before the Graduate Philosophical Society and Lectures on Jnâna
Yoga, Vedânta Society, New York.
Lectures from Colombo to Almora
Bartaman Bharat (in Bengali), Udbodhan
My Master
The Baker and Taylor Company, New York.
In 1887 compiled a Bengali song anthology named Sangeet Kalpataru.
Two journals were founded: Prabuddha Bharata in English and Udbodhan in Bengali.
Vivekananda composed "Khandana Bhava–Bandhana", a prayer song dedicated to Ramakrishna, in
1898.
He taught Shukla-Yajur-Veda, Sanskrit grammar and the philosophy of yoga to pupils on his last day.
The Ramakrishna Movement:
The Ramakrishna Mission founded by Swami Vivekananda in 1897, 11 years after the death of Ramkrishna.
Brahmo Samaj appealed to the rationalist Bengali but the average Bengali found more emotional satisfaction
in the cult of Bhakti and yoga.
The teachings of Ramakrishna Mission are based on ancient and traditional concepts amidst increasing
Westernization and modernization.
13
Unlike Arya Samaj they recognised image worship but emphasised on essential spirit not the symbols or
rituals.
He stood for selfless devotion to God with a view to the ultimate absorption in Him. This spirituality and
compassion for suffering humanity inspired all.
Broadly the movement had two Objectives:
1. To establish a band of monks who would be dedicated to a life of renunciation and practical spirituality.
These monks would spread the message of vedanta. (For the fulfilment of the first objective, Paramhans
founded Ramakrishna Math.)
2. To carry on preaching, philanthropic and charitable work with the help of lay disciples. In doing so,
treat everyone equally irrespective of caste, creed, color and gender. (The second objective was taken up
by Swami Vivekananda after founding Ramkrishna Mission in 1897.)
Ramakrishna Movement has as its common characteristics certain traditions and values. Some of these are
enumerated below:
No miracle-mongering.
Modern outlook
Non-sectarian approach
Love and Hospitality
From the Ramakrishna Movement, the Ramakrishna Mission (RKM) evolved. It was founded by
Vivekananda in 1897.
It mainly propagates the Hindu philosophy of Vedanta–Advaita Vedanta and Four Yogic Ideals– Jnana,
Bhakti, Karma, and Raja yoga.
It carries out extensive educational and philanthropic work in India and abroad.
The aims and ideals of the Mission are purely spiritual and humanitarian and have no connection with
politics.
The service activities are based on the message of "Jiva is Shiva" from Ramakrishna and Vivekananda's
message of "Daridra Narayana" to indicate that service to the poor is service to God.
The Motto of the organisation is Atmano Mokshartham Jagad-hitaya Cha (it means For one's own
salvation, and for the good of the world).
The ideology of Ramakrishna Math and mission is that the universe arises and sustains in infinite pure
consciousness or Brahman.
Brahman is immanent in all beings as the Atman which is man's true self and source of all happiness. But
owing to ignorance, he identifies himself with his body and mind and runs after sense pleasures. This is the
cause of all evil and suffering.
14
As ignorance is removed, the Atman manifests itself more and more. This manifestation of potential divinity
is the essence of true religion. This can be realized by one of the 4 yogas or by all of them.
The Vedanta Society of the City of New York, incorporated in 1898, is the oldest branch of the
Ramakrishna Mission in the United States.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture - 23
Social Reformers – IV
2
Social Reformers – IV
Dayanand Saraswati (1824 – 1883):
Dayananda Saraswati or Mulshankar was from a Brahmin family from Gujarat.
His father was a Vedic teacher and scholar so he learned Vedic literature, logic, philosophy, ethics etc. and
yoga. He became ascetic.
He was the first to call Swarajya – “India for Indians”.
He was the founder of Arya Samaj (1875 Bombay). Few years later established the headquarters at Lahore.
He attacked idolatry, polytheism, and superstitions practices.
He believed that Hinduism had been corrupted by divergence from the founding principles of the Vedas and
that Hindus had been misled by the priesthood for the priests' self-aggrandisement. For this mission, he founded
the Arya Samaj.
Dayananda advocated the Doctrine of Karma and Reincarnation.
He emphasised the Vedic ideals of brahmacharya, including celibacy and devotion to God.
However, his bent towards the Vedas which he regarded as infallible gave his teachings an orthodox hue.
He discarded the authority of purana and accused them for spreading evil practices including idol
worship and superstitions. Discarded other practices including idolatry, polytheism, superstitions and
sacrifices.
He created his own interpretation of Veda and published in his famous creation named Satyartha
Prakash.
Dayananda Saraswati rejected the philosophy of Maya (explained that soul is part of God and man’s
objective is to escape the evil world and seek union with God) and supported that God, Soul and Matter
were distinct and eternal entities.
He also rejected the concept of ‘Niyati (Destiny)’ and supported the Doctrine of Karma. He justified
that every individual had to work out his own salvation by right deeds.
Mulashankar denied the caste system based on birth but he supported the Vedic notion of four Varna
Systems based on occupation.
He exhorted Hindus to accept social reforms, including the importance of cows for national prosperity as
well as the adoption of Hindi as the national language for national integration.
He inspired Hindus to aspire for Swarajya (self-governance), nationalism, and spiritualism. He
advocated equal rights and respect to women and advocated for the education of all children, regardless
of gender.
In 1869, he won a debate against 27 scholars and 12 expert pandits, where the main topic was "Do the
Vedas Uphold Deity Worship?”
Shuddhi Movement:
To bring back the individuals to Hinduism who were either voluntarily or involuntarily converted to
other religions like Islam or Christianity.
Shuddhi or purification was imparted to those who sought their way back to Hinduism and the Samaj did an
excellent work in penetrating the various strata of society, taking back the depressed classes into the folds of
Hinduism.
4
Vedic School:
The Vedic School was established between 1869 and 1873.
Dayananda Saraswati established Gurukul (Vedic Schools) which emphasised Vedic Values, Culture.
The schools gave separate education to boys and girls based on ancient Vedic principles. The Vedic School
System was also to relieve Indians from the pattern of a British education.
The first Vedic School was established at Farrukhabad (UP) in 1869.
More emphasis was given to the study of Sanskrit scriptural texts.
According to Dayananda Saraswati, the Vedas were “India's Rock of Ages” - the true original seed of
Hinduism. His motto was “Go back to the Vedas”.
He gave his own interpretation of the Vedas and disregarded the authority of the latter Hindu scriptures like -
The Puranas (the work of lesser men and responsible for the evil practices of Idol worship and other
superstitious beliefs in Hindu religion).
Dayanand condemned Idol worship and praised the unity of Godhead. These views are published in his
Satyartha Prakash.
Dayanand launched a frontal attack on idolatry, polytheism, belief in magic charms, animal sacrifices, feeding
the dead that had kept into Hindu Religion in the 19th Century.
He rejected the popular Hindu philosophy which held that the physical world is an illusion and that man's soul
is merely a part of God, temporarily separated from God. Mulashankar was against this belief; he held that
God, Soul and Matter were distinct and eternal entities and every individual
had to work out his own salvation in the light of the eternal principles governing
human conduct.
In rejecting monism, he also gave a serious blow to the popular belief in
predetermination.
He accepted the Doctrine of Karma but rejected the Theory of Niyati.
He challenged the dominant position of Brahmin in the society and strongly
condemned the Caste System.
He advocated equal status of Women, pleaded for widow remarriage and also
condemned child marriages.
Monism: It is a theory or doctrine that denies the existence of a distinction or duality in a particular sphere,
such as that between matter and mind, or God and the world.
Nature of Reform:
The Reform Movement was divided into two parts:
1. Early Radical Reformers: Jyotiba Phule, Vishnu Bhikaji Gokhale etc. These reformers believe
revolutionary reorganisation of traditional society on the principles of equality and rationality. Their efforts
grew a sense of awareness in the depressed class people regarding various forms of discrimination.
2. Later Moderate Reformers: MG Ranade, Ganesh Venkatesh Joshi etc. who believed in return to past
society with some alteration.
The newspaper Darpan in 1832 was born out of this patriotism and social awareness. It was the first Marathi
newspaper to raise awareness of social change, such as the widow's remarriage, and to introduce more people
to the scientific method of life.
He challenged the Brahmanical orthodox.
His associates in this phase included people like Govind Kunte and Bhau Mahajan.
He attacked theology and tried to convert popular Hinduism.
He founded 'The Bombay Native General Library'.
In 1840, he introduced Digdarshan, which published essays on science and history.
The Bombay Native General Library and the Native Improvement Society was founded by Jambhekar
where the branch was the Students’ Literary as well as Scientific Library.
He was the first Indian to have published research papers in the quarterly journal of the Asiatic Society and
first person to print Dnyaneshwari in 1845.
He was also well known as the first professor of Hindi in the Elphinstone College, Mumbai.
The day of publication of the first issue of Darpan is 6 January and it is celebrated as the Journalist Day in
Maharashtra in his memory.
Paramhans Mandali:
The Paramhans Mandali was founded in 1849 in Maharashtra.
Founders of Paramhans Mandali were Dadoba Pandurang, Durgaram Mehtaji and Balshastri Jambhekar
and their colleagues.
9
It was a secret socio-religious group, it had close links with Manav Dharma Sabha.
They believed in one God and aimed at breaking caste rules.
At their meeting they had food cooked by lower caste people.
Also advocated widow’s remarriage and women's education.
Branches of the Paramhansa Mandalis existed in Poona, Satara etc.
His father was the treasurer of Bapu Gokhale, the general of Bajirao II during the Third Anglo-Maratha War.
He advocated a reorganisation of Indian society on rational principles and modern, humanistic, secular values.
He charged Hindu orthodoxy and supported social and religious equality.
Lokahitawadi wrote, 'Enforced widowhood is a murder of a living human being. It involves the killing of
human passions, feelings and emotions. You are butchering your own daughters in cold blood. Should
not your blood boil with rage?’
He promoted emancipation (liberation) and education of women, and wrote against arranged child marriages,
dowry system, and polygamy, all of which were prevalent in India in his times.
He was the first to consider the factors that contributed to our loss of independence.
He blamed the loss on eight factors, which he dubbed "Hindushashtak" (eight
aggregate causes of the ruin of Hindus).
He took a leadership role in founding Gyan Prakash, Indu Prakash, and Lokhitwadi
periodicals in Maharashtra.
His popular saying is that ‘If religion does not sanction social reform, then change
the religion.’
He initiated a weekly magazine named as Hitechhu.
He wrote Panipat war, Kalyug, Jatibhed, Lankecha Itihas. He also translated
some English works into Marathi.
The Shatapatree is an outspoken, impatient, and penetrating analysis of society's ills.
He wrote a book called Svadhyaya Athava Aryavidyancha Krama, Vichar ani Pariksana (study of the sequence
of Aryan learnings, thought, and review), which is more moderate in diction and contains the views of an
experienced, mature reformer.
The 'Shatapatree' and the 'Svadhaya' are the keys to unlocking Lok hitwadi's mysteries. Both books
essentially teach the same thing, but the latter is more clearly devoted to the Vedic era.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 24
Social Reform
Movement V
2
As a judge, he exercised his powers to promote equality of the sexes, the spread of education, rescuing
children and widows from social injustices, and protection of agricultural workers and land tenants from
exploitation.
He always advocated the use of constitutional and legal ways for attaining freedom and bringing in social
reforms.
Later, he became involved in the working of a number of institutions aiming at social, economic and political
advancement of India such as the Poona Sarvajanik Sabha, the Social Conference, Industrial Conference and
the Prarthana Samaj.
Prarthana Samaj:
The Samaj was started by Dr. Atmaram Pandurang 1867 with the help of Keshab Chandra Sen.
Emphasised on monotheism and ‘on works’ rather than faith.
It relied on education and persuasion and avoided confrontation with orthodox elements.
The Samaj fought against caste orthodoxy, polytheism and priestly domination.
The Samaj was later joined by Mahadev Govind Ranade, NG Chandravarkar and RG Bhandarkar.
Members held a meeting at the home of Atmaram Pandurang and publicly pledged to certain reforms,
including:
Denunciation of the Caste System
Encouragement of Widow Remarriage
Encouragement of Female Education
Abolition of Child Marriage.
Indian Social Conference:
The Indian Social Conference was founded by M.G Ranade and Raghunath Rao.
The conference met annually and at the same time and place as the Indian National Congress. Its first session
was in Madras.
It could be called the Social Reform Cell of the Indian National Conference.
Issues taken up were mostly on Inter Caste Marriage, Opposition to Polygamy and Kulinism.
It launched pledge movement to inspire people to take pledge against child marriage.
Contribution of MG Ranade:
He was one of the founding members of the Indian National Congress (INC) party.
He helped to establish the Vaktruttvottejak Sabha, the Poona Sarvajanik Sabha, Maharashtra
Granthottejak Sabha, and the Prarthana Samaj, and edited a Bombay Anglo-Marathi daily paper, the
Induprakash, founded on his ideology of social and religious reform.
He founded the Indian National Social Conference with Raghunath Rao in 1887. It integrated with the Indian
National Congress as a social reform cell of the Indian National Congress.
He launched Pledge Movement to create awareness among people for prohibition of child marriage.
6
In 1878, Vishnu Shastri Chiplunkar founded another monthly publication named Kavyetihas Sangraha,
with a vision of better familiarising the readers with the poetry and history of Maharashtra.
He established two printing presses, namely Aryabhushan Press and Chitrashala Press. He also opened a
bookshop named Kitabkhana.
His Contribution:
Publishing Nibandhmala, a monthly Marathi magazine dedicated to reform in society.
Aamachya Deshachi Sthiti (The State of our Nation) and Mudranasvatantry (Freedom of the Press) are
two of his influential political articles.
Along with Bal Gangadhar Tilak, he founded the New English School in Pune.
Both created Deccan Education Society with Gopal Agarkar, Mahadev Ballal Namjoshi and other
prominent reformers at that time.
He also established Fergusson College with Tilak and Agarkar.
Gopal Ganesh Agarkar (1856-95):
He was an Indian social reformer, educationist, and thinker from Maharashtra, India.
He was the co-founder of multiple educational institutes such as the New English School, the Deccan
Education Society and Fergusson College along with Tilak, Vishnushastri Chiplunkar, Mahadev Ballal
Namjoshi, V. S. Apte, V. B. Kelkar, M. S. Gole and N. K. Dharap.
He was the first editor of the weekly Kesari and founder and editor of a periodical, Sudharak.
He was the second Principal of Fergusson College.
He campaigned against the injustices of untouchability and the caste system.
Publications:
Futke Nashib (Biography)
Alankar Mimmansa
Dongarichy Turangatil 101 divas (1882)
Marathi translation of Hamlet
Ganesh Vyankatesh Joshi (1851-1911):
In 1898, the Mumbai government conferred on him the title of Rao Bahadur.
He provided brilliant critique of the economic policy of the colonial government.
He emphasised on the importance of education for the change in society.
Narayan Ganesh Chandavarkar:
He is considered as a pioneer philosopher of his time and emerged as a great
leader of the Prarthana Samaj.
He took the leadership reins from Mahadev Govind Ranade.
He became the Vice chancellor of the University of Bombay.
He presided over the INC session in 1900. After that he took a break from politics
and dedicated his time towards judiciary.
8
He became the head of the All-India Moderates Conference in 1918 along with Surendranath Banerjea
and Dinshaw Wacha.
He was knighted in the 1910 New Year Honours List.
In 1920, he raised his voice against the report of the Hunter Committee on the Jallianwala Bagh
atrocities. Mahatma Gandhi was inspired by his bold step and later on his advice called off his Civil
Disobedience campaign in 1921.
Dhondo Keshav Karve:
Dhondo Keshav Karve was popularly known as Maharshi Karve.
He was a social reformer in India in the field of women's welfare.
He advocated widow remarriage and he himself married a widow.
Karve was a pioneer in promoting widows' education.
In 1896, Karve started the first widow’s school in Pune.
He founded the first women's university in India - SNDT (Shreemati Nathibai Damodar Thackersey)
Women's University in 1916.
During 1891–1914, Karve taught mathematics at Fergusson College in Pune, Maharashtra.
In the year 1896 he established Widow’s Home in Poona where he encouraged women to skill themselves in
teaching and nursing.
Karve wrote two Autobiographical Works: Atmawrutta (1928) in Marathi, and Looking Back (1936) in
English.
The Marathi play Himalayachi Saavli ("The Shadow of the Himalayas") by Vasant Kanetkar, published
in 1972, is loosely based on the life of Karve.
Awards and honours: The Government of India conferred him with Padma Vibhushan in 1955 and Bharat
Ratna in 1958.
Sakharam Ganesh Deuskar (1869-1912):
He was born in a Marathi Family and brought up in Bengal due to this he
became the bridge between reform movements in Bengal and Maharashtra.
He worked as teacher, writer, activist and journalist due to which he was one of
the major architects of the Indian Renaissance.
He was the editor of Hitwadi (Bengali) newspaper.
Aurobindo Ghosh has written that the credit for the first use of the word
'Swarajya' goes to Deuskar.
His political teacher was Bal Gangadhar Tilak.
One of the most influential works which contributed to the enlightened class of
the Renaissance period was his work 'Desher Katha' published in 1904.
In Surat Split when the Congress was divided into the Extremist and the Moderates the owner of the Hitwadi
asked Deuskar to write an editorial in the Hitwadi against the Extremist and Tilak. He refused to write
editorial articles against Tilak as a result he had to resign from the post of editor of Hitavadi.
9
Later, when Hitavadi's managers requested him to become editor again, Deuskar accepted it.
He was appointed as a teacher of Bengali language and Indian history at the National Council of Education,
Calcutta.
Desher Katha:
The book was first published in 1904.
It had an immense impact on young minds during the Swadeshi Movement.
It informed masses about street plays and folk songs and had assumed the status of mandatory reading for an
entire generation of swadeshi activists.
In 1905, its fifth edition launched, looking at its popularity the British government had banned the book in
1910 and confiscated all the copies.
The theme of this book tells the act of Britishers how they exploited India ruthlessly. It also summarised the
work of MG Ranade and D. Naoroji in a popular idiom and warned in its concluding chapters against the
colonial state’s “hypnotic conquest mind”.
Seva Sadan:
In 1885, he founded Seva Sadan along with his friend Diwan Dayaram Gidumal, which took care of those
women who were exploited and neglected by society.
It took care of women exploited and discarded by society.
Provided these women with education, medical services, etc.
Gopal Krishna Gokhale (1866-1915):
He was a prominent social and political leader of India during the Indian
National Movement.
He was honoured with the Most Eminent Order of the Indian Empire.
Being one of the first generations of Indians to receive a university education,
Gokhale graduated from Elphinstone College in 1884.
He was exposed to Western political thought and became a great admirer of
theorists such as John Stuart Mill and Edmund Burke.
He had a great influence on the social works of Justice Mahadev Govind
Ranade in his life. He was named as the ‛Protege Son’ i.e., Manas Putra of
Justice Mahadev Govind Ranade.
Gokhale assisted M.G. Ranade to start the Sarvajanik Sabha Journal.
He is considered as one of the greatest Indian liberal.
Gokhale was a senior leader of the Indian National Congress and the founder of the Servants of India
Society.
In 1889, he joined Congress. In 1905, he was elected the president of Indian National Congress.
He was also the Political Guru of Mahatma Gandhi.
Servant of India Society:
In 1905, Gopal Krishna Gokhale founded Servant of India Society after leaving Deccan Education
Society for the expansion of Indian education.
He believed that India would only be possible when a new generation of Indians became educated as to
their civil and patriotic duty to their country and to each other.
Objective of the Servant of India Society was to provide opportunities to Indians and gain political
education which was not provided by existing educational institutions of Indian Civil Service.
Gokhale wrote that "The Servants of India Society will train men prepared to devote their lives to the
cause of the country in a religious spirit, and will seek to promote, by all constitutional means, the
national interests of the Indian people."
The Servant of India Society actively participated in promotion of education and health and took various
initiatives to fight social evils of poverty, untouchability, exploitation, alcoholism, oppression of
women.
The Servant of India Society in 1911 began to publish its organ the Hitwada in English from Nagpur.
11
Bharat Stree Mahamandal was a women's organisation in India founded by Sarala Devi Chaudhurani in
Allahabad in 1910.
One of the primary goals of the organisation was to promote female education, which at that time was not
well developed.
Its objectives included promotion of education for women, abolition of the purdah system and improvement
in the socio-economic and political status of women all over India.
Ramabai Ranade founded the Ladies Social Conference (Bharat Mahila Parishad).
13
In the 1890s, she founded the Mukti Mission at Kedgaon village, near Pune.
The All-India Women’s Conference (AIWC), was founded in 1927 by Margaret Cousins in order to
improve educational efforts for women and children and has expanded its scope to also tackle other women's
rights issues.
Gyan Prasarak Mandali (1848):
Also known as Students’ Literary and Scientific Society.
Had two Branches - Marathi and Gujarati.
It organised lectures on popular science and social questions.
One of its aims was to start school for girls.
Southern India:
Kandukari Veersalingam Puntulu (1848-1919):
He was a social reformer and Telugu writer from the Madras Presidency, British
India.
He was known as the Father of Modern Telugu Prose.
He had been credited to spread Brahmo activities to South India. Influenced by the
ideology of Brahmo Samaj he constructed a temple known as 'Brahmo Mandir' in
1887.
He started a school in Dowlaiswaram in 1874.
Built the 'Hithakarini School' in 1908 in Andhra Pradesh.
He was one of the early social reformers who encouraged the education of women and the remarriage of
widows.
His novel Rajasekhara Charitramu is considered to be the first novel in Telugu literature.
He is often considered as the Raja Rammohan Roy of Andhra.
Caste Associations in Madras Presidency:
The influence of socio-cultural awakening acquired a distinct form in the Madras Presidency and the
emergence of caste associations of various kinds.
These socio-cultural associations stressed on a common heritage of caste members and aspired to reform in
socio-religious practices.
Some of the associations are as follow:
Kongu Vella Sangam of Gounder Caste
Tamil Nadu Vokkaliga and Lingayat Associations in Mysore
Sri Narayan Guru Dharma Paripalana Yogam of the Ezhavas of Kerala (SNDP Yogam, 1902)
14
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture - 25
Other Religious Movement
2
Rakhmabai Case:
Dr. Rakhmabai was an Indian physician and feminist who was also one of the first woman doctors to practise
in colonial India. She was married as a child bride, which led to a landmark judicial battle during the phase of
1884 and 1888.
She at the young age of eleven married Dadaji Bhikaji of nineteen years old at that time. Twelve years after
their marriage, in 1885, Bhikaji filed a petition with the court seeking the "restitution of conjugal rights."
The Rakhmabai Defense Committee was founded by Pandita Ramabai and Behramji Malabari to defend her.
The litigation went on for four years before Dadji received an out-of-court settlement in 1888.
Thus, the case was instrumental in the development of the Age of Consent Act in 1891.
Theosophical Movement
Theosophy is derived from the Greek word ‘theosophia’ meaning "God's wisdom".
It refers to systems of esoteric philosophy concerning, or seeking direct knowledge of, presumed mysteries of
being and nature, particularly concerning the nature of divinity.
Its essence is in its referring to hidden knowledge or wisdom that offers the individual enlightenment and
salvation.
It was started by Theosophical society.
Theosophical Society
It was founded by Madame H. P. Blavatsky and Colonel Olcott in New York in 1875.
In 1882, the headquarters of the Society were established in Adyar, near Madras (now Chennai) in India.
It was inspired from Indian traditional thought and philosophy.
Objectives
Promote Universal Brotherhood of Humanity, without distinction of race,
creed, sex, caste or colour.
Encourage the study of Comparative Religion, Philosophy and Science.
Investigate unexplained laws of Nature and the powers latent in man.
It welcomes everyone who supports its three objects, regardless of belief,
social custom or marriage status.
3
Philosophical Outlook
Universal Brotherhood
Belief in theory of Karma
Belief in Reincarnation
There exists a Consciousness Universal and Individual
Immortality of Man
Miscellaneous Movements:
Dharma Sabha:
It was formed in 1830 in Calcutta by Radhakanta Deb.
Its objective was to counter the ongoing social reform movements led by protagonists such as Raja Ram
Mohun Roy and Henry Derozio.
It filed an appeal in the Privy Council against the ban on Sati by Lord William Bentinck.
4
Campaigned against the Hindu Widow Remarriage Act, 1856 and submitted a petition against the proposal
with nearly four times more support than the one submitted for it by Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar.
Ved Samaj:
Ved Samaj was established by Keshab Chandra Sen and K. Sridharalu Naidu in 1864.
K. Sridharalu Naidu visited Calcutta and after returning in 1871 he renamed Veda Samaj as Brahmo Samaj of
Southern India.
The Samaj worked on the translation of Brahmo Dharma into Tamil and Telugu.
Radhaswami Movement:
He started in Agra in 1860 by Swami Shiv Dayal Singh (Tulsi Ram).
He believed in supremacy of one God, supremacy of Guru, a company of pious people (satsang) and a
simple social life.
They don’t call for renunciation of worldly life for spiritual attainment.
It rejected the concept of sacred rituals, scripture and pilgrimages. He believed in one supreme being,
supremacy of the guru, company of pious people and simple social life.
It offered a tough and well-planned challenge to Britishers' draconian rule in India from 1830s to 1860s. It was
the first Muslim movement against western influence.
Initially the movement was directed against Sikh but after the annexation of Punjab by the British, it was
directed against the British.
Movement was led by Abdul Wahab of Arabia and Delhi’s saint Shah Waliullah Dehlavi.
In the case of India their ideology was carried out by Syed Ahmad Barelvi (Syed Ahmad of Barelvi) and Shah
Abdul Aziz.
Faraizi Movement:
It was founded by Hazi-Shariat-Allah. In 1818, the movement protected the rights of tenants to a great extent.
It was led by Haji Shariatullah in Eastern Bengal to give up un-Islamic practices and act upon their duties as
Muslims.
The Faraizi movement was widely received in the districts of Dhaka, Faridpur, Barisal,
Mymensingh and Comilla.
They began as a peasant movement but later turned into a religious sect
supporting radical religious and socio-political changes.
After the 1840s the movement became revolutionary under the leadership of Hazi’s
son Dudu Mian.
Dudu Mian propagated an egalitarian ideology.
He organised paramilitary forces armed with clubs to fight Hindu landlords and police.
He opposed the right of the zamindars to collect tax, set up a parallel government
in some parts of Bengal and even established village courts.
The leader of the Faraizis was called Ustad or teacher, and his disciples xagrid or students, instead of using the
terms like pir and murid.
A person so initiated into the Faraizi fold was called Tawbar Muslim or Mumin.
7
Aligarh Movement:
The objective of this movement was to give respectable and dignified status to Muslims in society.
Its main aim was the push to establish a modern system of Western–style scientific education for the
Muslim population of British India.
8
This deficiency led to the Aligarh Movement. The epicentre of the foundation of the Muhammadan Anglo-
Oriental College in 1875.
It was a movement of Muslim renaissance with widespread implication for religion, politics, culture and
society of India.
Main focus of movement
Loyalty to Britishers.
Modern western education for the Muslims to compete with peers.
The movement had a profound impact on the Muslim society compared to the other powerful but less adaptable
movements of the 19th century.
It emerged as a liberal, modern trend among the Muslims intelligentsia based on Mohammedan Anglo
Oriental College, Aligarh (founded by Sir Syed Ahmed Khan in 1875)
Aim of Aligarh Movement:
Spreading modern education among Indian Muslims without weakening their allegiance to Islam.
Bring in social reforms among Muslims related to purdah, polygamy, widow’s remarriage, women’s
education, slavery, divorce, etc.
Its ideology was based on the liberal interpretation of the Quran.
⮚ It sought to harmonise Islam with modern liberal culture.
Social Reform
He opposed the custom of polygamy and purdah system and spread of education among women. He
believed in tolerance policy and rational outlook.
He attacked the system of Piri and muridi (pirs claimed to be followers’ Sufi school) and denounced the
institution of caste discrimination.
He spread progressive social ideas through his magazines Tehzib-ul-Akhlaq.
His other literary work is Tuhfa-i-hasan and the Loyal Muhammadans of India.
Religious Reform
Sayyid Ahmed Khan showed respect to all religions against religious fanaticism and bigotry.
The organization spread western liberation education to Indian Muslims and established a network of
schools and colleges for that purpose.
Mirza Ghulam Ahamad was a supporter of the Deoband school, Shibli Numani, chose to incorporate English
language and European science into education.
He founded Nadwatal Ulama and Darul Uloom in Lucknow in 1894-96.
He believed in the ideology of Congress and the cooperation between Muslims and Hindus in India to
create a world where they could both live in peace.
Muslim Organization/Movements
ORGS & MOVEMENTS FOUNDERS & LEADERS AIM OF FORMATION
1. Wahabi movements Shah Walliulah (Shah Abdul Revivalist in nature it aimed at creating a “homeland
(Tariquah- Aziz. Syed Ahmed Barevli) for Muslims.
Muhammediyan (Punjab 1840).
2. Deoband movement Muhammad Qasim To propagate among the Muslims the teaching of the
(Darul ulum) Wanatavi and Rashid Ahmed Quran. No western education
Gangoli (Deoband-
Saharanpur 1866)
11
3. Nadwah-ul-Ulama Maulana Shibli and others To reorganise Muslim education system, develop
(Lucknow 1894). religious, science, reform Muslim morals and put an
end to the theological controversies within Islam.
4. Ahi-I-Hadis (People of Maulana Syed Nizir Hussain They preach the saying of the prophet and the Quran
the Hadis) (Punjab). as the ultimate authority on Islam.
5. Ahi-i-Quran (People of Maulavi Abdullah Chakralvi To preach the teaching of the Quran as the ultimate
the Quran) (Punjab). authority on Islam.
6. Ahmadiya Movement Mirza Gulam Ahmed The movement was based on the universal religion of
(Quadiani in Punjab 1869). all humanity. It aimed at spreading western liberal
education among the Indian Muslims.
7. Aligarh Movement Sir Syed Ahmed Khan and Based on the liberal interpretation of the Quran. It
others (Aligarh 1870s). aimed at spreading western and scientific education
among the Muslim masses.
8. Arhar Movement Muhammed Ali Hakim They disliked the loyalist policies of Aligarh School
Ajmal Khan. Maulana Zafar and advocated active participation in the national
Ali & Hasan Iman movement.
Nirankari Movement
It was a reform movement founded by Baba Dyal Das in northwest Punjab in 1851. (Present day Rawalpindi).
It sought to restore the practices and beliefs of Sikhs back to the era when Guru Nanak was alive. This
movement emerged in the aftermath of the end of Sikh Empire and the Sikh history after Ranjit Singh's death.
Its principles include:
⮚ Strongly opposing idol worship of human gurus, worship of tombs, graves,and representing the
"formless" God with any image. Instead he re-emphasized the Sikh belief in Nirankar the Formless One.
⮚ Nirankaris strongly oppose representing the "formless" God with any image, and believe that the true
Sikh faith is based on nam simaran (remembering and repeating God's name).
12
They considered the women equal to men and initiated them through baptism and allowed them to remarry
when widowed.
Some violence in Amritsar and Rajkot (on cow slaughtering) clashed with the government and later Ram Singh
was deported to Rangoon.
Importance of Movement
It instils the sense of social, religious and political awakening among the common people and people
belonging to Sikh princely states.
Trained them to organise, protest and how to fight oppression in these princely states.
Post Akali movement people continue to fight under leadership of Sardar Seva Singh Thikriwala.
The Akali Movement was regional but not communal in nature.
Objectives:
For the regeneration of the social condition of the Parsis
Restoration of the Zoroastrian religion to its pristine purity.
Reforms:
The newspaper Rast Goftar spreaded the message of the reform movement.
Rast Goftar ("The Truth Teller") was an Anglo-Gujarati paper operating in Bombay that was started
in 1851 by Dadabhai Naoroji and Khurshedji Cama and championed social reform among Parsis in
Western India.
The Sabha criticised the elaborate ceremonies in marriage and funerals so it stood for uniform laws
of inheritance and marriage for the Parsi community.
Improving the status of Parsi women in society.
It challenged the Purdah system.
It also advocated for an increase in the age of marriage and to support girl education.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 26
Caste
Movements
2
Caste Movements
Caste Movements:
Next to the issue of women emancipation, the caste system became the second most important issue of social
reforms.
The Shudras were subjected to all kinds of social discrimination.
In the beginning of the 19th century the castes of India had been split into innumerable sub castes on the
basis of birth.
In the meantime, a new social consciousness also dawned among the Indians.
Mahatma Gandhi made the removal of untouchability a part of his constructive programme. He brought out
a paper, The Harijan, and also organised the Harijan Sevak Sangh.
Dr. Bhimrao Amzbedkar dedicated his entire life for the welfare of the downtrodden.
In Bombay, he formed a Bahishkrit Hitkarini Sabha in July 1924 for this purpose.
Later, he also organised the Akhil Bharatiya Dalit Varg Sabha to fight against caste oppression.
The leadership of the samaj was provided by the people from backward classes.
Its major aims were Social Services, Women’s education and education of lower caste.
Jyotiba Phule’s aim was the complete abolition of the caste system and socio-economic inequalities.
After the death of Phule it was revived in the early 20th century by the Maratha ruler of the princely state
of Kolhapur, Shahu Maharaj.
Awareness Through Printing Media:
Deen Bandhu, 1877 in Pune: It was a Marathi Journal exposing the oppression attitude of Vedic traditions.
Gulamgiri (Slavery, 1873): It was a book by Phule expressing his views on the roots of Shudras slavery.
Shetkaryacha Asud, 1881: It was a book which provided solutions to farmers and peasant problems.
Isara, 1885: It was a pamphlet that published Jyotiba Phule's idea on economic concern of the agrarian
classes. He is credited to introduce the peasant class in Indian politics.
Other Published Work of Jyotibha Phule:
Tritiya Ratna
Brahmananche Kasab
Powada : Chatrapati Shivaji Raje Bhosle Yancha,
Powada: Vidya Khatya Til Brahman Pantoji
Manav Mahammand (Muhammad) (Abhang)
Gulamgiri,
Shetkaryacha Asud
Satsar Ank
Ishara
Gramjoshya
Sarvajanik Satya Dharma Pustak
Akhand Adi Kavya Rachna
Asprushyanchi Kaifiyat
The Depressed Class Mission Society:
It was founded by Vitthal Ramaji Shinde in 1906 at Bombay.
It was launched by the Prarthana Samaj as an independent association to organize educational facilities
for lower castes.
Aims of Depressed Classes mission were:
To try to get rid of untouchability.
To provide educational facilities to the untouchables.
To start schools, hostels, and hospitals for the untouchables.
To solve their social problems.
5
Bahujan Samaj:
It was founded by Mukundrao Patil in 1910 at Satara, Maharashtra.
It opposed the exploitation of the lower caste by the upper caste Brahmins, landlords, merchants and
moneylenders.
Vitthal Ramji Shinde (1873-1944):
He was one of the most important social and religious reformers in Maharashtra.
His greatest contribution was to attempt to eradicate the practice of untouchability and bring about
equality to the depressed classes in Indian society.
His early spiritual awakening came from his reading of Sant Tukaram, Sant Eknath and Sant Ramdas of
Maharashtra.
He was selected by Prarthana Samaj to go to England in 1901, to study comparative religion at Manchester
College, Oxford.
Contribution of Vitthal Ramji Shinde:
In 1905 he established a night school for the children of untouchables in Pune.
In 1906 he established the Depressed Classes Mission in (Bombay).
In 1910 he founded Murali Pratibandhak Sabha.
In 1912 he organised the Asprushyata Niwaran Parishad.
In 1917 he succeeded in getting the Indian National Congress to pass a resolution condemning the
practice of untouchability.
In 1919 he gave evidence before the Southborough Franchise Committee, asking for special
representation for the untouchable castes.
In 1933 he published his book Bhartiya Asprushyatecha Prashna ("India’s untouchability
question").
B. R. Ambedkar (1891 -1956):
He was born in Mahar (untouchable) caste at Mhow.
His Educational Qualifications:
He completed his Graduation from Elphinstone college.
He did his Masters and Phd from Columbia University.
He did another Phd from London School of Economics.
He completed his Law degree from Grey’s inn.
He was a Jurist by profession.
He had experienced the worst form of casteist discrimination during his
childhood. He fought against upper caste tyranny throughout his life.
He organised the All India Scheduled Castes Federation, while
several other leaders of the depressed classes founded the All-India
Depressed Classes Association.
6
Ambedkar condemned the hierarchical and insular caste system as a whole, and advocated the annihilation
of the institution of caste for the real progress of the nation.
The struggle of the depressed classes led to the provision of special representation for these classes in the
Government of India Act, 1935.
He resorted to methods of agitation and launched Satyagraha to establish the civic right of the untouchables
to enter the Hindu temples and draw water from public wells.
He worked for the moral and material progress of the untouchables throughout his life.
In July 1924, Ambedkar started an organization in Bombay called ‘Bahishkrit Hitkarini Sabha’
[Depressed classes institute] for the moral and material progress of the untouchables.
In 1927 he founded Samaj Samata Sangh to preach social equality.
He published Bahishkrit Bharat, a Marathi fortnightly and Janata, a weekly.
In 1930 founded the Depressed Class Federation, entered national politics and raised the demand of the
sectoral electorate.
He attended all 3 Round Table Conference (also Tej Bahadur Sapru) as official nominee which led to
communal award 1932 and ended with Poona Pact with Gandhiji.
He formed the Independent Labour Party in 1936.
He became a member of Bombay legislative Council in 1937.
In April 1942, he founded the All Scheduled Caste Federation as an all-India party which was the
successor organization of the Independent Labour Party, later it evolved into a Republic Party of India.
He served in the Governor General executive council as a member for labour.
He formed the People's Education Society for teaching untouchables in 1945.
Bhimrao Ambedkar was appointed the Law Minister in the Interim government and also the chairman of the
constituent Assembly Drafting committee.
In 1956 he converted into Buddhism. Later, he announced that Scheduled castes would leave Hindu fold
altogether. He along with many followers embraced Buddhism.
Mahad Satyagraha or Chavdar Tale Satyagraha was a satyagraha led by B. R. Ambedkar on 20 March
1927 to allow untouchables to use water in a public tank in Mahad (currently in Raigad district),
Maharashtra. The day (20 March) is observed as Social Empowerment Day in India.
Literary work of B.R. Ambedkar:
Castes in India
Ambedkar in the Bombay Legislature, with the Simon Commission and at the Round Table
Conferences, 1927–1939
Philosophy of Hinduism
Riddles in Hinduism
7
It claimed to represent the interest of all non-Brahman communities; it also included people from Muslim,
Christians and untouchables.
The Party further broadened his vision to reform and regenerate non-Brahmanical society and culture. To
follow this vision leaders like Ramaswamy Naikar launched a separate Self-
Respect movement.
EV Ramaswamy Naicker (1879-1973):
He opposed the caste system at his young age.
He joined Congress in 1919 and in the year 1924 he became hero of Vaikom
Satyagraha.
He abandoned Hindu mythology.
In 1925 he started the Self-respect Movement.
In 1927 broke off with Gandhi on Varnashrana dharma. His followers are called
(Thantai and Periyar).
The causes of decline
It was limited to upper class non-brahmin castes.
The merging with justice changes the character of Periyar.
Self-Respect Movement:
In 1925, it was started by E.V. Ramaswami Naicker also known as ‘Periyar’
in Madras (Tamil Nadu).
The anti-Brahmin and Hindu Orthodoxy radical movement, which advocated
weddings without priests, forcible temple entry, total defiance of Hindu social
laws and also theism at times.
Periyar and his followers campaigned constantly to influence and pressure the govt. to take measures to
remove the inequality, untouchability, manual scavenging system etc) even while other nationalist
forerunners focused on the struggle for political independence.
The Self-Respect Movement was described from the beginning as "dedicated to the goal of giving non-
Brahmins a sense of pride based on their Dravidian past".
Contribution of Ramasamy
He criticised Brahminical domination and caste system.
He alleged that religion is responsible for exploitation of the lower class and women.
Rejected religion and scriptures as guiding principles of social organisation.
He rejected Hinduism as an instrument of Brahmanical control.
10
Vivah Vidhi explained marriage rights in Telugu and this book talks about the ritual rule for shudras.
11
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 27
Political Awakening
2
Political Awakening
Growth of Modern Political Ideas:
Favoured by -
Industrialization
Urbanisation
Print Capitalism
Act of 1861-1892
Responsible Factors:
Impact of British rule
Coming up with the idea of Nationalism and the right to self-determination.
Political unity of India
Establishment of peace and administrative unification of India
Means of transport and communications
Modern education
Modern Press
Rise of middle class
Historical researches
Contemporary European movements
Socio-religious reforms
Racialism
Economic exploitation
Lord Lytton
Ilbert Bill controversy
Print Capitalism:
It is a theory underlying the concept of a nation, as a group that forms an imagined community, that emerges
with a common language and discourse that is generated from the use of the printing press, proliferated by a
capitalist marketplace.
Capitalist entrepreneurs printed their books and media in the vernacular (instead of exclusive script
languages) in order to maximise circulation.
Factors and Forces that led to the rise of the National Movement:
Indian Nationalism was partly the product of a world-wide upsurge of the concepts of nationalism and
right of self-determination initiated by the French Revolution, partly the results of Indian Renaissance, partly
the offshoot of modernization initiated by the British in India and partly developed as a strong
reaction to British imperial policies in India."
Impact of British Rule: Modern methods of rule to establish their stronghold on the country. Modernisation
came in this package along with the imperial character of the rule which struck at the hearts of Indians.
3
For the first time from the Himalayas to KanyaKumari and from Assam to Khyber Pass came under one rule.
This political unity gave the sense of unification of India. This was never seen before.
1. Peace, Administrative and Economic Unification under British rule played an important role in the
national awakening. Pax Britannica brought prolonged peace. Administration followed a system which did
not change with the change of power or officers.
Indian civil services, unified judicial setup, and codified civil and criminal laws throughout the
country - All this helped in creating the political unity which supplemented the cultural unity which
was already existing in India.
Britishers were successful in creating a state larger than those created by Mauryans and Mughals.
Pax Britannica (Latin for "British Peace", modelled after Pax Romana) was the period of relative peace between
the Great Powers during which the British Empire became the global hegemonic power and adopted the role of a
global police force.
Unification helped in the following ways: The destruction of local self-sufficient economy and the
introduction of modern trade and industries on an all-India scale had increasingly made India’s
economic life a single whole and interlinked the economic fate of the people living in different parts of
country consequently, the economic crisis in one part of the country started being experienced in the
other parts also. The feeling of oneness generated a common set of grievances and prepared them for a
concerted action.
According to A.R. Desai, modern means of transport were a formidable force in unifying the Indian
people. Better railways and posts and telegraphs made it possible for nationalist to meet at a place,
exchange their views and easily correspond with one another.
Why were Britishers interested in developing the modern means of transport?
The necessity of administrative convenience.
Defend its territories in India from external forces.
Urge for economic penetration and economic exploitation of India.
2. Economic Exploitation: Interests of all classes of Indian Society were hurt under the British rule. The
continuous drain of wealth from India resulted in Stagnation of the Indian economy. India came to be one
of the poorest countries of the world and had been reduced to a storehouse of raw material and a market
for manufactured goods. Periodical famines became a regular feature of Indian economic life. The export
of food grains even during famine years alienated even the most loyal supporters of the British regime.
3. Western Thought and Education: It played an important role in the birth and growth of Indian
Nationalism. The introduction and spread of English made it the lingua franca of the country and the
educated persons from different parts of the country began to understand each other well. The writings of
Rousseau, J.S. Mill Voltaire and political deeds of Mazzini, Garibaldi taught them the lessons of freedom
and patriotism.
4
4. Contemporary European movements: It brought Nationalist ideas to India as well. Liberation movement
of Greece and Italy and especially Ireland influenced the nationalists.
5. Rise of new urban Middle class Intelligentia: They learnt English for employment and prestige. Because
of education and proximity to the rulers brought them to the forefront. This middle class also provided
leadership.
According to Percival Spear, “The new middle class was a well-integrated all-India class with varied
backgrounds but a common foreground of knowledge, ideas and values.. It was a minority of Indian
society but a dynamic minority. It had a sense of unity of purpose and of hope.”
6. Socio-religious Movements: The organisation like Brahmo Samaj, Arya Samaj etc. brought Renaissance
in the country. It helped in bringing together different sections of the society by removing the social evils
which was the major cause of split in the society.
7. Role of Press: The latter half of the 19th century saw an unprecedented growth of Indian-owned English and
vernacular newspapers. Newspapers like the Indian Mirror, the Bengali, the Amrita Bazar Patrika, the
Hindu Patriot, Indu Prakash, The Kohinoor etc. created a strong public opinion against the excesses of
the colonial administration and played a significant role in mustering patriotism. The press also helped the
nationalists to convey their views easily to the masses. By 1875, there were 400 Indian owned newspapers.
8. The writings and researches of great scholars: Both European and Indian (like Sir William Jones, Max
Muller, Jacoby, R.D. Bhandarkar, H.P. Shastri, M.G. Ranade etc.) revealed the greatness of India’s past
which filled the people with a sense of pride. They began to look forward to an era when India would again
achieve her glory. The progressive character of socio-religious reform movements sought to remove social
evils which divided the Indian society, e.g., Raja Rammohan Roy.
Timeline of Events:
1850: Lex Loci Act brought the right of converts to inherit ancestral property. [Caste disabilities removal
Act]
1860: It imposed income tax, it reverberated with nationwide protest.
1865: The imposed income tax was withdrawn.
1867: Reimposed as certificate tax 1% on all trades and professions.
1868: Converted to fall fledged income tax.
1870: Increased rates by 3⅛% in 1870.
After 1857: The establishment of universities in 3 Presidencies.
1882: The Education became free enterprise
Number of college students:
1894: 18,571
1874: 4499
5
Swami Dayanand, Swami Vivekananda etc. drew the attention of the Hindu society towards the
greatness of its ancient culture. The confidence so gained helped the nationalists to demolish colonial
myths that Indians were destined to be ruled by foreigners.
There was also another aspect of British rule which aided the growth of Indian nationalism. They
practiced a form of hidden but universal apartheid. They considered Indians uncivilised and inferior.
Even the qualified Indians were not appointed to high posts. They called themselves the “master race”.
However, the theory put forward by the European Scholars which suggested that the Indo-Aryans
belonged to the same ethnic group from which other European nations evolved gave the much-
needed psychological boost to the Indians. The confidence they gained fuelled the national movement.
9. The reactionary policies of Lord Lytton (1876-80): It further gave an impetus to national awakening.
The maximum age limit for the I.C.S. examination was reduced from 21 years to 19 years, thus making
it impossible for Indians to compete for it.
The magnificent Durbar at Delhi in 1877 to proclaim the assumption of imperial title by queen
Victoria, when the country was in the severe grip of famine, solicited the remark from a Calcutta
journalist that ‘Nero was fiddling while Rome was burning’.
The Vernacular Press Act of 1878 imposed restrictions on newspapers and journals printed in Indian
languages.
Lord Lytton (1876-80)
He was undoubtedly a "man of ideas".
He was known in the literary world as "Owen Meredith" Poet. He was a good Novelist and Essayist.
Lord Lytton was the nominee of the conservative government of Disraeli.
To appease the Lancashire lobby, Lytton abolished import duties on 29 Articles and this made the
imports of British textiles cheaper into India.
The Sea Customs Act of 1878 provided the basis for implementing the official
bias in favour of imports from Britain.
The Royal Titles Act (1876) awarding Queen Victoria with the title of Kaiser-
e-hind (Queen Empress of India).
The appointment of the Famine Commission (Strachey) in 1878 during the
period of Lord Lytton, which was reformed later.
The Arms Act (1878) made it a criminal offence to keep an arm without
licence [3 years imprisonment/time/both/racial].
The Vernacular Press Act of 1878 authorised the Post offices to search and siege any Vernacular writings
of seditious nature.
Lytton proposed the closing of Covenanted Civil Services for Indians:
6
Rendition of Mysore.
Florence Nightingale gave him the title of "Saviour of India".
He wanted to remove the disparity in judiciary, thus he brought the llbert Bill (1883-84).
CP llbert was the law member.
Ilbert Bill Controversy
The Ilbert Bill controversy also raised questions.
Ripon's government sought to abolish the racial discrimination and wanted to empower Indian
magistrates to try European subjects.
All the Europeans living in India strongly opposed this, Bill. Ripon had to modify the bill which almost
defeated the original purpose. But it made it amply clear that the British were deeply jealous and full of
hatred for Indians.
This controversy compelled the people to take measures to have an all-Indian National congress, founded in
Dec. 1885, was the first organised expression of the Indian national movement on an all-India Scale. It had,
however, many predecessors.
Predecessors of the Indian National Congress:
In 1818 William Adam was working in Calcutta to master Sanskrit and Bengali.
He was engaged in creating a translation of the New Testament in Bengali.
He worked with Ram Mohan Roy and also a member of the Calcutta Unitarian Society (later eclipsed by
Brahmo Samaj)
Later he returned to Britain.
The primary objective was to secure the welfare and advance the interests of all classes of Indian subjects by
lawful and peaceful means.
It was the rival to Landholders society.
The society was engaged in lobbying the bureaucracy and petitioning the government.
The society also sent petitions urging the government for increasing employment of Indians in public
offices and for judicial reforms.
Objective of Bengal British India Society:
To collect and disseminate information relating to the actual condition of the people in British India.
To employ peaceful and lawful means to secure the welfare and interest of all classes of citizens.
But neither the Bengal British India Society nor the Zamindari Association could achieve much,
although in the growth of political parties in India they played pioneering roles. Both languished by 1850.
British Indian Association 1851
It was created in 1851 in Bengal by combining the objectives of the "Landholders Society" (considered
as aristocracy of wealth) and "British India Society" (aristocracy of intelligence).
The first President of the British Indian Association was Raja Radhakanta Deb, and secretary was
Debendranath Tagore.
In 1852 its branches created:
Bombay (Bombay Association).
Madras (Madras Native Association).
British Indian Association sent a petition to the British Parliament demanding:
Establishment of a separate legislature of popular character.
Separation of executive from judiciary.
Reduction in salaries of higher officials.
Abolition of salt duty, akbari and stamp duties.
These demands were partially accepted in the Charter Act of 1853.
India League (1875)
Indian League was founded by Sisir Kumar Ghosh with the aim of stimulating the sense of nationalism
amongst the people and promoting political education.
It was superseded by The Indian Association.
Sisir Kumar Ghosh
He was the founder of the Amrita Bazar Patrika, a noted Bengali language newspaper in 1868.
He was one of the first batch of students who passed in the first entrance examination of the Calcutta
University in 1857.
10
It led a campaign against the 'Arms Act' and the 'Vernacular Press Act'.
It sponsored an all-India conference in Calcutta in 1883 which was attended by more than 100 delegates
from different parts of the country.
Thus, it can be called the forerunner of Indian National Congress (INC) as an all-India nationalist
organisation.
In 1886, it merged with the Indian National Congress.
Political Association in Bombay:
Bombay Association 1852
It was the first political organisation in the Bombay Presidency founded by Jagannath Shankarsheth in
1852.
It includes the leaders like Sir Jamshedji Jejeebhoy, Naoroji Fursungi, Dr. Bhau Daji Lad, Dadabhai Naoroji
and Vinayak Shankarshet.
Sir Jamshedji Jejibhai was the first president of the organisation.
11
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 28
Moderates Era
1885 - 1905
2
He was the first Indian Wrangler (a student who has completed the third year of the Mathematical
Tripos with first-class honours) of Cambridge University.
In 1878 along with Shibnath Shastri, Sib Chandra Deb, Umesh Chandra Dutta and others founded the
Sadharan Brahmo Samaj. He was elected its first president.
In 1879, founded the Chhatrasamaj, the student's wing of the Sadharan Brahmo Samaj movement.
He was associated with the "Indian League" founded by Sisir Kumar Ghosh.
He protested against the acts like Vernacular Press Act and Civil Services Act.
The campaign was against over imposition of licence Tax and abolishing Import duties.
The campaigns for opposition to the Afghan war (1878-80) and against Lytton’s Afghan adventure.
The campaigns against the Vernacular Press act (1878), Indian arms Act (disarming Indian) 1878
and the Plantation Labour and the Inland Emigration Act (1881-82).
The campaign was also launched against the reduction in maximum age for appearing in Indian Civil
services.
There was a need for a campaign to raise a national fund to promote political agitation in India as
well as in England.
3
Evolution of INC:
Bulk of Resentment Against Colonial Rule: Exploitation and atrocities from
British rule had made place for disaffection. All progress of society was
hampered, the lowest section of society peasants and tribal people were in
continuous revolt. British Policies were against the welfare of people.
Emergence of Intelligentsia: The Failure of revolt, uprising exposed the lack of
leadership. Post 1857 a new educated class emerged which is also referred to as
professional class or English educated elite, intelligentsia. Their way of revolt
was ideological, their minds were full of modernity, pride of their past they
began to identify the evil intention of Britishers.
Inclusion of Art and Culture and media: Including plays, magazines, newspapers, mass rally gained
immense popularity which make people attach personally and somewhere this develops a sense of pride and
affection which ultimately result in nationalism.
For instance Neel Darpan by Dinbandu Mitra Portrayed the pain and deplorable condition of
farmers. Anand Math by Bankim Chandra portrayed the Sanyasi Rebellion.
Political Association: The emergence of various political associations and their work on ground level efforts
to root out evil practices in society had won the confidence of people.
Different Approach: Till 1857 princes, kings, and rebellions were engaged with the British directly but this
time political association was winning over colonial rule by legislation and getting fruitful results motivating
people to rely on political upfront.
Bombay 38
Madras 20
Informed at last moment the representatives: Bengal 4; NWFP + Awadh 7 and Punjab 3
⮚ Though Western lead over Zamindars.
Lord Dufferin:
He served as ambassador to Imperial Russia from 1879 to 1881 and to the
Ottoman Empire from 1881 to 1884.
He served as Governor General of India and Viceroy from 1884 to 1888.
He advanced the cause of the Indian Nationalists greatly during his terms.
During his tenure:
Imperial Service Corps: He laid the foundations for the modern Indian
Army by establishing the Imperial Service Corps, officered by Indians.
The formation of the Indian National Congress in 1885 took place.
Dufferin Report (1888), on the Conditions of the Lower Classes of Population in Bengal.
He portrayed the plight of the poor in Bengal, and was used by nationalists to counter the Anglo-
Indian claim that British rule had been beneficial to the poorest members of Indian society.
On the basis of the report, he recommended the establishment of provincial and central councils with
Indian membership, a key demand of Congress at that time.
Burmese War: The third Burmese war led to annexation of the whole of Burma and Burmese ruler was
exiled to India.
Imperial Service Troops:
The Imperial Service Troops were forces raised by the princely states of the British Indian Empire. All
Indians are led by Indian officers.
They were available for service alongside the Indian Army when such service was requested by the British
government.
In 1900, the total numbers were 18,000 men approx.
They were routinely inspected by British army officers and generally had the same equipment as soldiers
in the British Indian Army.
Panjdeh Incident or the Battle of Kushka (1885) were an armed engagement between Afghanistan and the
Russian Empire, there was a diplomatic crisis
Britain prepared for war but both sides backed down and the matter was settled diplomatically.
7
Moderate’s Approach:
The important moderate leaders include Dadabhai Naoroji, Pherozeshah
Mehta, D.E Wacha, W.C Bonerjee and S.N Banerjee.
Moderates were staunch believers in liberalism and moderate politics.
They believed that British rule was in India’s interest.
They never aimed at directly challenging the colonial rule but to bring it as
close as possible to the national rule.
Their method of struggle is popularly known as 3P’s- Prayer, Petition and
Protest.
They believed that the British wanted to be just to the Indians but were not
aware of the real conditions and if they made the British aware of the real condition they will act in a just
manner.
To achieve this, they worked on two fronts:
1. Create a strong public opinion and educate and unite the masses on common political questions.
2. Persuade the British government to introduce the reforms laid out by them.
In 1889, A British committee of Indian National Congress was established in London as its organ.
Dadabhai Naoroji spent a substantial portion of his life and income campaigning for India’s cause abroad.
Methods of Work: (earned them the name ‘Moderates’)
Constitutional agitation within the four walls of the law
Slow, orderly political progress
Presentation of public demands through resolutions, petitions, meetings etc.
Educating Indian public opinion and British public opinion
Dadabhai Naoroji:
He was known as the “Grand Old man of India”.
In 1866, he founded the East India Association in London to raise the issues of India.
He formed Rehnumai Mazdayasan Sabha and Rast Goftar was the mouthpiece of it.
He became a Liberal Party Member of Parliament in the British House of Commons, representing Finsbury
Central between 1892 and 1895.
He was the second Asian to be a British Member of Parliament.
9
The first Anglo-Indian as well as Asian descent Member of British Parliament was David Ochterlony
Dyce Sombre.
He wrote “Poverty and Un-British rule in India” which propounded drain theory.
⮚ It was the main reason behind the creation of the Royal Commission on Indian Expenditure in 1896.
He was the active congress leader of moderates’ faction and held presidentship for max times i.e., 3 times –
1886; 1893 and 1906.
He was the first to use the term Swaraj in session in 1906.
Major works:
He started the Rast Goftar, an Anglo-Gujarati Newspaper in 1854.
The manners and customs of the Parsees (Bombay, 1864).
The European and Asiatic races (London, 1866).
Admission of educated natives into the Indian Civil Service (London, 1868).
The wants and means of India (London, 1876) Condition of India (Madras, 1882).
Poverty of India.
A Paper Read Before the Bombay Branch of the East India Association, Bombay, Ranima Union Press,
(1876).
Lord Salisbury's Blackman (Lucknow, 1889).
The Parsee Religion (1861).
Poverty and Un-British Rule in India (1902).
He had a great influence on the social works of Justice Mahadev Govind Ranade in his life. Also called as
‘Protégé Son’ i.e., Manas Putr.
Also, he was inspired by the admirers of theorists such as John Stuart Mill and Edmund Burke.
In 1899 he was elected to the Bombay Legislative Council.
In 1901, he was elected to the Imperial Council of the Governor-General of India, and again on 22 May 1903
as non-officiating member representing Bombay Province.
He was the founder of Servants of Indian society for the expansion of Indian education.
In 1905 presided over the Benaras session of Indian National Congress and condemned the Partition of
Bengal.
He rejected the title of knighthood and refused to accept a position in the Council of the Secretary of
State for India.
His last public duty was to serve as a member of the Indian Public Service commission (1912-1915).
“All movements of the kind in which we are concerned pass through several phases as they run their
course. The first is one of ridicule. That is followed, as the movement progresses, by one of abuse, which
is usually succeeded by partial concession and misapprehension of aim, accompanied by warnings against
taking ‘big jumps into the unknown’.
The final stage of all is a substantial adoption of the object of the movement, with some expression of
surprise that it was not adopted before. Well, gentlemen, we have pretty well passed the first two stages.
We have survived the ridicule, the abuse, and the misrepresentation.
We have survived the charge of sedition and disloyalty. We have survived the charge of being a
microscopic minority. We have also survived the charge of being guilty of the atrocious crime of being
educated, and we have even managed to survive the grievous charge of being all Babus in disguise.”
Kadambini Ganguly:
Kadambini Ganguly was one of the first Indian female doctors who practised
with a degree in modern medicine.
She was the first Indian woman to practise medicine in India.
Kadambini Ganguly was the first woman to gain admission to Calcutta
Medical College in 1884.
She was the first woman speaker in the Indian National Congress.
She along with Chandramukhi Basu were the first two female graduates from
India.
Drawbacks of the Moderates:
They failed to reach the masses.
Their influence was limited to the educated elite class.
Somewhere they felt that Britishers presence was necessary for the modernisation of India.
There was widespread dissatisfaction among the extremists and people.
Achievements of Moderates:
Economic Critique:
The most significant historical contribution of the moderates was that they offered an economic critique of
colonialism. It was done by the moderate leaders like Dadabhai Naoroji, R.C Dutt and D.E Wacha.
They made an intensive study of all the aspects of contemporary colonial economic exploitation and arrived
at the conclusion that the sole objective of British economic imperialism was to establish the control of the
British economy over the Indian economy.
12
They complained of India’s growing poverty and economic backwardness. Dadabhai Naoroji declared that
the British rule was “an everlasting, increasing, and every day increasing foreign invasion,” that was “utterly,
though gradually, destroying the country.” Drain theory was the key theme of this economic critique of
colonialism.
Moderates argued that British rule has transformed a self-sufficient Indian economy into a Colonial.
Economy where it has become a supplier of raw materials, food stuffs and importer of finished goods- which
is continuously driving India into poverty.
They were successful in creating All-India public opinion on this.
Constitutional Reforms:
Condition of Legislature: The imperial legislative council formed under the Indian council Act 1861 was an
impotent body with no real power. Its purpose was to disguise official measures as having been passed by the
legislature.
Apart from a few intellectuals such as Syed Ahmed Khan, Kristodas Pal, V.N Mandlik, K.L Nulkar
and Rashbehari Ghosh, those who were nominated to the legislative council were mostly the wealthy
and loyalists.
From 1885-1892 the demands made by nationalists were centred around two aspects:
Council Expansion: There was a greater participation of Indians.
Council Reforms: More power and control over finances.
Under the pressure of the early nationalists, the British parliament passed the Indian councils Act in
1892.
However, the reforms failed to satisfy the nationalists. Now they demanded:
Majority of elected Indians in the Council.
Control over budget: Power to vote and amend. They gave the slogan ‘No taxation without
representation’
Dadabhai Naoroji, G.K Gokhale and B.G Tilak went one step further and demanded self-government on
the lines of self- governing colonies in Australia and Canada.
Although the council was impotent, the Nationalists were able to use it effectively, turning into a platform for
ventilating popular grievances, exposing defects in governance and raising basic economic issues.
Administrative Reforms:
The early nationalists also worked incessantly for the reforms of an administrative system ridden with
corruption, inefficiency and oppression.
Their major demands with respect to administrative reforms included:
13
Indianization of the higher grades of the administrative services on economic, political and moral
grounds.
Separation of the Judiciary from Executive.
They demanded for a Police reform.
They opposed the aggressive foreign policy against India’s neighbours.
They urged the opening of agricultural banks to provide loans to the farmers at the low rate of interest.
They called for an increase in welfare expenditure and gave special focus on elementary education,
irrigation works, etc.
They also demanded the better treatment of Indian labourers abroad in other British colonies.
Civil Reforms:
The early nationalists were conscious of achievements and the need for civil rights. They put up a strong
defence of modern civil rights, namely, the freedoms of speech, the press, thought and association whenever
the government tried to curtail them.
They were successful in making the public conscious about their civil rights. It was the result of this that
the arrest of Tilak and several journalists in 1897 and deportation of Natu Brothers without trial led to huge
public outrage.
However, very few of the reforms for which the early nationalists agitated were introduced by the
government. But we cannot declare them as failures. Their record is quite bright if the immediate difficulties
of the task they had undertaken are kept in view.
They failed to realise that it was only during the freedom struggle and political participation, the masses
were to come together.
Lack of a mass base prevented moderates from taking a strong position against the British Govt.
But, according to Bipan Chandra, “the period from 1858 to 1905 was the seed time of Indian Nationalism
and the early nationalists sowed the Seeds Well and Deep. In spite of their many failures, the early
nationalists laid strong foundations for the national movement to grow upon and that they deserve a high
place among the makers of modern India.”
They were able to create a national awakening with all Indians having a common interest.
They made the Indians rally around a common programme against a common enemy i.e., British and thus
generated a feeling of belonging to one nation.
They popularised modern ideas and trained people with political work.
Most importantly they created a solid base for the upcoming militant and mass-based national movement.
More Achievements:
The Public Service Commission established in 1886 also called Aitchison Commission, under Lieutenant
Governor (Sir Charles Umpherston Aitchison) of Punjab by Lord Dufferin.
Recommendations:
Statutory Service to be abolished.
Examination to be held in Britain only.
Recommendations for strengthening Provincial Services.
Indians also get employed in public service.
Indian Councils Act of 1892 was also passed.
The resolution in the House of commons for simultaneous examinations of ICS in London and India 1893 but
not implemented.
The appointment of the Welby Commission on the matter of Indian expenditure in 1895.
The Royal Commission on the Administration of Expenditure of India was set up to look into Indian
expenditures.
The Membership included Lord Welby, Lord Chaman and T.R. Buchanan as Parliamentary
representatives, and William Wedderburn, Dadabhai Naoroji, and William S. Caine as representatives
of Indian interests.
This improved the economic condition of India by reducing excessive expenditure.
The Drain theory was propounded by Dadabhai Naoroji, RC Dutta and Dinshaw Wacha.
15
Issues:
The extremist faction already was in the pipeline and were annoyed.
International events like the rise of Japan, and the defeat of Italy by Ethiopia.
All these events brought the moderate era towards its ends.
He was the Congress President in both the Bombay Session, 1889, and Allahabad Session, 1910.
He left for India in 1860 and began official duty at Dharwar as an Assistant Collector. He was appointed
Acting Judicial Commissioner in Sindh and Judge of the Sadar Court in 1874. In 1882 he became the District
and Sessions Judge of Poona. At the time of his retirement in 1887, he was the Chief Secretary to the
Government of Bombay.
16
During his service in India, Wedderburn's attention was focussed on famine, the poverty of the Indian
peasantry, the problem of agricultural indebtedness and the question of reviving the ancient village
system. His concern with these problems brought him in touch with the Indian National Congress.
After his retirement, Wedderburn threw his heart and soul into it. He presided over the fourth
Congress held in Bombay in 1889.
He entered British Parliament in 1893 as a Liberal member and sought to voice India's grievances in the
House. He formed the Indian Parliamentary Committee with which he was associated as Chairman
from 1893 to 1900.
In 1895, represented India on the Welby Commission (i.e., Royal Commission) on Indian Expenditure.
He also began participating in the activities of the Indian Famine Union set up in June 1901, for
investigation into famines and proposing preventive measures.
He came to India in 1904 to attend the 20th session of the Indian National Congress in Bombay, which
was presided over by Sir Henry Cotton.
He remained the Chairman of the British Committee of the Congress from July 1889 until his death.
Along with the founders of the Indian National Congress, he believed in the future of India in partnership
with the British Commonwealth and welcomed the formal proclamation made by the British Government
on 20 August 1917, that the goal of British policy in India was the progressive establishment of self-
government.
Wedderburn's main contribution to the promotion of national consciousness was his life - long labour on
behalf of the Indian Reform Movement.
The Montagu - Chelmsford Reforms were regarded by him as the crowning glory of his life's work.
“What are the practical objects of the Congress movement? They are to revive the national life, and to
increase the material prosperity of the country; and what better objects could we have before us? Lastly,
as regards our methods, they are open and constitutional, and based solely on India's reliance upon British
justice and love of fair play.” From the Presidential Address - William Wedderburn I.N.C. Session, 1889,
Bombay.
17
3. Badruddin Tyabji 1887 Madras Appeal made to Muslims to join hands with
other national leaders.
12. Rahimtulla M. Sayani 1896 Calcutta National song “Vande Mataram” sung for the
first time by Rabindranath Tagore.
15. Romesh Chunder Dutt 1899 Lucknow Demand for permanent fixation of land
revenue
17. Dinshaw Eduji Wacha 1901 Calcutta First time Gandhiji appeared on the Congress
platform
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 29
Moderates Achievements
and Lord Curzon
2
The appointment to covenanted civil services were to be made by open competition under the rules
laid down by the sec. of state with the help of civil service commissioners.
The Governor- General of India became the Viceroy of India.
He was the Direct representative of the crown in India,
Lord Canning became the first Viceroy of India.
The Act empowered the Viceroy to make rules for the more convenient transaction of business in
the council. This power was used by Lord Canning to introduce the portfolio system in the
Government of India.
Similar Provision in Constitution of India:
Article 77 talks about the Conduct of business of the Government of India
1. All executive action of the Government of India shall be expressed to be taken in the name of the
President.
2. Orders and other instruments made and executed in the name of the President shall be authenticated in
such manner as may be specified in rules to be made by the President, and the validity of an order or
instrument which is so authenticated shall nor be called in question on the ground that it is not an order
or instrument made or executed by the President.
3. The President shall make rules for the more convenient transaction of the business of the
Government of India, and for the allocation among Ministers of the said business.
The Act also empowered the viceroy to issue ordinances, without the concurrence of the legislative
council, during an emergency. The span of the ordinance was 6 months.
Similar Provision in Constitution of India:
Article 123 in The Constitution of India 1949
Article 123 mandates the Power of President to promulgate Ordinances during recess of Parliament.
1. If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in session, the President is satisfied that
circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such
Ordinance as the circumstances appear to him to require
2. An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of Parliament,
but every such Ordinance.
“Shall be laid before both Houses of Parliament and shall cease to operate at the expiration of six
weeks from the …”
Universities,
District boards,
Municipalities,
Zamindars,
Trade bodies
Chambers of commerce
Above were empowered to recommend to provincial councils.
The rights of the members of the legislatures were also increased.
They were now entitled to express their views on financial statements which were henceforth to be
made on the floor of the legislature and give necessary suggestions for increasing or decreasing
revenue and expenditure.
Although they were not empowered to move resolutions or divide the house in respect of any
financial question.
However, they were empowered to put questions within certain limits to the Government on
matters of public interest after giving a notice of 6 days.
With regards to the provincial legislatures: The Act increased the number of additional members
Bombay and Madras - 8-20
Bengal - 20 max
NWFP and Oudh - max 15
Assessment of the Act of 1892:
It questions the executive.
It gave some powers over financial accounts and a budget. For ex - The general observation on the budget
and give necessary suggestions.
The eminent Indian leaders now found their way in the legislatures. E.g.,
Gopal Krishna Gokhale
Asutosh Mookherji
Ras Bihari Ghosh
Surendra Nath Banerjee
Criticism:
The critics pointed out that the system of election in the Act was a roundabout one.
It was only a nomination.
The government can accept or reject the nomination.
Functions of the legislative councils.
There were no provisions of supplementary questions.
Any question could be disallowed and no remedy against it.
The rules of elections were termed as unsatisfactory because several classes were over represented
while others did not get any representation at all.
9
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
MODERN HISTORY
Lecture – 30
Lord Curzon and the Rise
of Extremism
2
❖ The Department of Commerce and Industry was formed and they look after:
➢ The industrial and commercial interest.
➢ Railways
➢ Mines
➢ Ports
➢ Marines
➢ Factories
➢ PnT
Land Revenue:
❖ The New resolution took place on 16 January 1902.
❖ There was a greater elasticity in revenue collection.
❖ There was a reduction if the crop failed.
❖ Gradual increase of revenue if there is an increase in demand.
Irrigation 1901 Commission - Sir Colin Scott Moncrieff:
❖ The additional expenditure is 4.5 CR over 20 years.
❖ The Jhelum Canal was completed.
❖ Digging started for upper Jhelum, upper Chenab and Lower Bari Doab.
❖ The Punjab land alienation Act 1900 agricultural land could not be transferred for non-agriculture purposes.
❖ The Cooperative Credit Society Act 1904 provides agricultural loans at cheaper rates.
❖ The Imperial agriculture department was set up under the Inspector general.
Indian coinage and Paper currency Act 1899:
❖ The British currency was declared legal tender in India and a pound was declared equivalent to rupees fifteen.
❖ Tried for Gold standard but failed.
❖ Finally, Gold exchange standard Plan but only for foreign remittances.
Judicial Reforms:
❖ It aimed at improving the Judicial set up.
❖ The number of Judges at Calcutta High Court increased.
❖ The Salary and pension benefits of Judges of High Court as well as subordinate courts improved.
❖ The Indian code of Civil Procedure was revised.
❖ Though nothing substantial was done to improve the procedure followed or delay caused in decision of cases.
Army reforms:
❖ In 1902, Lord Kitchener came to India as the Commander-in-Chief and carried out much needed reforms in
the army. [Kitchener test]
➢ Northern command with HQ at Murree
➢ Southern command with HQ at Poona
5
Lord Kitchener:
❖ 1902 appointed Commander-in-Chief, India, and arrived there to take up the position in November, in time to
be in charge during the January 1903 Delhi Durbar.
❖ He immediately began the task of reorganising the Indian Army.
❖ Kitchener's plan "The Reorganisation and Redistribution of the Army in India" recommended preparing
the Indian Army for any potential war by reducing the size of fixed garrisons and reorganising it into two
armies, to be commanded by Generals Sir Bindon Blood and George Luck.
Calcutta Corporation Act 1899:
❖ The act reduced the number of elected legislatures and increased the number of nominated officials to deprive
Indians from self-governance.
➢ 28 members of the Corporation resigned in protest.
Ancient Monuments Act 1904:
❖ The Act established an Archaeological Department under a director.
❖ It was assigned the responsibility of repair, restoration and protection of historical monuments.
❖ Lord Curzon asked the native rulers to take similar measures in their respective states and urged the provincial
governments to open museums for the safe preservation of rare objects.
Railway Reform:
❖ The Curzon era built more railway lines than any other viceroys.
❖ The Robertson Commission (1901) recommended creating a Railway Board.
What should be the ideal land frontier and how to protect it?
❖ According to Curzon it should be the North Western Area or Asiatic Area which comprises Arabia; Persia;
Afghanistan; Tibet; Siam (Thailand).
6
❖ According to him, either the British or their allies should have them else their enemies would take over. He
considered it as the “Menace to our security”.
Persian Gulf:
❖ This region has special interest from the 17th century and also occupied important stations.
❖ British residents acted as arbiters in the Persian Gulf region.
❖ The Navy tackled piracy and enforced peace between fighting chiefs from Aden (Yemen) to Baluchistan.
❖ 1875 – 1900:
➢ European nations competing for colonies or
'spheres of influence'.
➢ Russia was thrusting southward as they needed a
port in the Persian Gulf.
➢ France also needs a cooling station.
➢ Germany wanted to extend the Berlin Baghdad
Railway to the Persian Gulf.
➢ Turkey also wants to re-establish suzerainty over
Kuwait.
➢ In 1892, English claimed to manage the Persian
Gulf but it was not accepted.
➢ In 1898, M. Ottawi, French Consul at Muscat secured a cooling station of Bandar Jissah from the Sultan
of Oman.
➢ Curzon sent Meade, supported by Admiral Douglas to Oman.
➢ Military action against the Sultan revoked the concession.
❖ 3 May 1903
➢ According to Lord Lansdowne, the British needed a naval or fortified base in the Persian Gulf.
➢ Lord Curzon personally visited the Persian Gulf region.
➢ Lord Curzon believed that if Russia succeeded to establish a base there then it would be a huge loss for
us.
➢ Lord Curzon also checked Russian interference in the Perso-Afghan dispute (old treaty of 1857 - Persia
and Afghanistan agreed to settle their differences through the British government.)
➢ In 1902 Curzon dispatched Sir Henry Mac Mohan for arbitration.
Tibet:
Background of English – Tibet Relations:
❖ In the 1770s George Bogle was sent as Company envoy by Lord Wellesley to find a trading opportunity in
Tibet.
❖ In 1866 British tried to obtain the ‘Consent of China’ for trade in this region but failed.
❖ In 1890 there was a dispute between Tibetan – Sikkim over boundary and the English saw this as an
opportunity.
7
❖ During this time Mr. Boodrick was the Secretary of State and he charged the British Indian Government for
disregarding his instructions.
❖ Russia was given assurance that no protectorate would be built and will not intervene in the internal affairs of
Tibet.
❖ British Indian Government defended Younghusband and called it an error of judgement, and thus the treaty
was revised:
❖ Indemnity = 25 lakh
❖ Chumbi valleys = evacuation after 3 years (evacuated in Jan 1908).
❖ In 1907 an Anglo Russian Convention took place and it was decided that any negotiation with Tibet can only
happen through China.
❖ Partition of Bengal:
➢ It was an example of Curzon’s maladministration.
➢ Stirred anger among people and inactivity from moderates raged extremists.
➢ One side Indian leaders were uniting people, Curzon divided.
❖ Rising unemployment: Educated class was rising and many were working with low salaries and others facing
unemployment. This crisis attracted youth to the idea of radical politics of extremists. Educated Indians were
convinced that to root out European imperialism needed European revolutionaries.
❖ Socio-religious and Cultural Reform: The ideas and preaching of Vivekananda, Bankim Chandra and
Dayanand were inspiring people and building new confidence and pride in their culture and values.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture - 31
Extremist Era 1905 -1919
2
❖ He used the Ganesh Chaturthi and Shiv Jayanti (birth anniversary of Shivaji) festivals to create unity and
a national spirit among the people.
❖ Tilak led Swadeshi Movement 1905 during partition of Bengal and to promote it, Tilak with Jamshedji Tata
established Bombay Swadeshi Stores.
❖ He spent 6 years in Mandalay prison from 1908 to 1914 for writing articles
defending Prafulla Chaki and Khudiram Bose.
❖ He was one of the founders of the All-India Home Rule League, along
with Annie Besant and G S Khaparde.
❖ He died at the start of the Non-cooperation movement.
❖ His Literary Work:
⮚ “The Orion or Researches into the Antiquity of the Vedas”.
⮚ “The Arctic Home in the Vedas”.
⮚ “Gita-Rahasya”.
❖ He wrote several articles warning India of the changes happening around the world. Pal wrote under the title
"Our Real Danger".
Aurobindo Ghosh:
❖ He criticised moderates for their methods through his writings in Indu Prakash, New lamps for the old.
❖ He was the editor of the English newspaper Bande Mataram through which he advocated Passive Resistance.
Passive resistance: It commonly refers to actions of nonviolent protest or resistance to authority. The central
feature is the conscious choice by the actors to abstain from a violent response even in the face of violent
aggression.
❖ In the 1906 congress session he assisted in forming the fourfold objective of “Swaraj, Swadesh, Boycott and
National education”.
❖ He became the principal of Bengal National college in Calcutta in 1906.
❖ He was arrested by the British in the Kennedy murder case 1908.
❖ He was arrested in the aftermath of charges of treason for Alipore Conspiracy.
❖ He retired from politics and started his Ashram in Pondicherry.
❖ His publication of articles titled “New Lamps for the Old” in Indu Prakashan
which referred to congress as “proletariat”, “dying of consumption”.
❖ His major writings
⮚ The Life divine
⮚ Synthesis of Yoga
⮚ Savitri - A legend and a symbol and a Monthly Magazine “Arya”.
❖ Attitude towards British: The moderates believed that the British People were just, righteous and freedom
loving. The extremists were neither admirers of western culture and civilization nor did they believe in
the British ruler’s sense of justice and fair play.
❖ Moderates believed in England’s providential mission in India while extremists rejected it as an illusion.
❖ Moderates believed that political connection with the British was in India’s interest, while extremists believed
that any connection with the British would result in exploitation of India.
❖ Moderates professed loyalty to the British crown while extremists believe that Britishers were unworthy of
claiming any loyalty.
❖ Ideology: The moderates derived their ideological inspiration from western liberal thoughts and European
history, While the ideological source of extremists were Indian history, cultural heritage and Hindu
traditional symbols.
Aims Reform of the society was the major Swaraj was the major goal.
goal.
Methods 3 Ps (Prayer, Petition and Protest). Extra constitutional, Boycott, Swadeshi and
Passive Resistance.
Social Base Zamindar, Elites, Middle Class Middle Class Intelligentsia and Urban
Intelligentsia masses.
Activities of Extremism:
❖ The protest against the Age of Consent Bill on the ground that Britishers should not interfere in the personal
life of Indians.
❖ Organising festivals like Ganpati and Shivaji festival to inculcate the feeling of nationalism and propagate
their ideology.
❖ In a big act Tilak took control of “Poona Sarvajanik Sabha” by ousting Gokhale and Ranade. After that
Gokhale created Deccan Sabha which proved the faction between ideologies of both sections.
❖ Appeal to refusal paying revenue to the colonial government.
❖ Absence of Lala Lajpat during 1893 to 1900 congress session.
Hindu Revivalism:
❖ An attempt to define Indian nation in terms and Hindu religious symbols, myths & history.
❖ Reform movements in which various moderate leaders were involved.
❖ Bring changes within religion and bring it on the lines of modern liberal ideas
❖ National social conference was formed.
❖ Revivalism was born out of westernising forces and their critiques of Hindu civilization
8
Bengal:
❖ By 1870’s Brahmo Samaj became weakened and it was the era of Ram Krishna and Vivekanand Movement,
though not a revivalism.
❖ Sasadhar Tarakchudamani were of the view that precedents in past for every modern discovery of west.
❖ There was an existence of missionary zeal.
❖ The orthodox Hindu used to condemn other reform bodies as elitist as they focus more on social service.
❖ The teaching was selectively employed for the revival purpose.
❖ The social service and thoughts on the evil of Hinduism were sidelined.
❖ Thought on the glory of Hindu past was more popular.
❖ Bharat Varsh Arya Dharma Pracharini Sabha worked on reviving Hinduism as per Vedas, Tantras and
Puranas.
❖ Bankim Chandra Chatterjee viewed Krishna as a modern politician and a nation builder. In his Anandmath
(1882), he portrayed the mother goddess as the icon for the nation and wrote the song Vande Mataram.
⮚ Though it was not orthodox ritualistic Hinduism, rather “Reconstituted Hinduism” – a rationalistic
Dharma.
⮚ Recognition of the elasticity and immense internal diversity.
Maharashtra:
❖ By 1890 Ranade and K.T. Telang were sidelined in the Prarthana Samaj.
❖ Between 1884-1887, the Rukhmabai Case was held at Bombay High Court.
❖ She was married as an infant to 22 year old husband Dadaji.
❖ She refused to recognize his conjugal rights.
❖ She lost the case and was threatened with imprisonment.
❖ Behramji Malabari and Pandita Ramabai formed the Rukhmabai Defence Committee.
❖ Pressure was on the British to pass the Consent Bill in 1891 to prevent early consummation of marriage
(garbhdhan).
⮚ The first act was passed in 1860 and had no opposition, it prohibited marriage below 10 years of age.
Later a New Act proposed the minimum age to be 12 years.
❖ All these events invited the powerful Hindu backlash from the orthodox.
❖ Their argument was that foreign rulers had no right to interfere into religion and society.
❖ In Maharashtra it was led by B.G. Tilak and his Poona Sarvajanik Sabha, they viewed that education not
legislation required to oppose evil.
❖ Though it was accepted in case of cow slaughter or recent Rukhmabai court ruling.
9
❖ In 1890 death of all eleven-year-old girl Phulmani because of sexual abuse by her husband.
⮚ But Kesari and Mahratta still upheld the conservative view. This requires Hindu girls to marry before
puberty but consummation has to await puberty.
⮚ Sasadhar Tarakchudamani also wrote about this in Bengali.
❖ The Age of Consent Bill was passed in March 1891.
❖ Prof R.G. Bhandarkar of Poona Deccan College was of the view that Dharmashastra-marriages after puberty
were allowed in Hindu religion.
❖ Arya Samaj started the cow protection movement in 1893.
❖ In 1871, Kakas took up the cow protection issue to win more support from the masses.
❖ Gau Rakshmi Sabhas were established in UP, Madras, Bombay, Bengal, Bihar and also demanded for legal
ban. The first riot in Mau, Azamgarh took place, tension subsided in 1893.
Language controversy:
❖ Hindi and Urdu are more or less the same language in 2 different scripts, but Urdu was officially recognized.
❖ In 1860’s Hindi-Urdu controversy arose in the North Western Provinces and Awadh.
❖ The controversy again, revived in 1882 in Punjab and Central Provinces.
❖ In 1893 Nagari Pracharani Sabha was set up in Benaras.
❖ Bharatenda Harish Chandra he was the proponent of Classical Sanskrit Heritage of Hindi.
❖ But this led to a new rift among Hindu – Hindi and Urdu – Muslim. Later, Madan Mohan Malviya made it
political.
❖ In April, 1900, a Resolution by the government and North Western Provinces and Awadh gave Nagri equal
official status as Urdu. Anjumman-Tarriqqi-e-Urdu was established in response to it.
❖ Ganpati Festival in 1893 and Shivaji festival in 1896 was started by Tilak.
❖ In the 1820s Madras, Vibhuti Sangam was established.
❖ In 1840’s Dharma Sabha and the Theosophical Society was established in 1882 at Madras.
⮚ European Tea planters demanded a Maritime outlet near Calcutta to reduce dependence on Assam-Bengal
railways.
⮚ Also, as per the Census 1901, the population of Bengal reached 78.5 mn.
⮚ Curzon Minute on Territorial Redistribution in India, published as Risley Papers (Dec, 1903).
❖ Partition:
⮚ Assam: Chittagong, Dacca, Mymensingh
⮚ Central Provinces: Chotanagpur
⮚ Bengal: Sambalpur and feudatory states from Central provinces, Ganjam district and Vizagapatnam from
Madras.
❖ Brodrik, the Secretary of State, accepted it but reluctantly.
❖ It was a deliberate blow aimed at a growing solidarity of self-consciousness of the Bengali people. It was a
Machiavellian device to divide the people on the basis of religion. It was a master plan to destroy the nascent
nationalism in Bengal.
❖ Risley, Home secretary to the government of India, wrote in an official note: “Bengal united is a power.
Bengal divide will pull in several different ways.”
On the basis of religion: Western half became Hindu majority and eastern half became Muslim majority. In order
to try to woo the Muslims, Curzon argued that Dacca could become the new capital of eastern Bengal.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 32
Extremist Era II
2
Extremist Era II
Swadeshi Movement (1905):
Anti-Partition movement under ‘Moderates’ 1903-05:
The moderates began to criticize the partition scheme ever since it was declared in December 1903 and
announced in January 1904.
The leadership was provided by Surendranath Banerjee, Krishna Kumar Mitra and Prithwish Chandra Ray
who launched a powerful press campaign against the partition proposals.
Method of protest: Petition, memoranda, propaganda and public meetings - 500 protest meetings were
held.
Journals like Bengalee (Surendranath Banerjee) and Sanjibani (Krishna Kumar mitra) wrote
vehemently against it
Indian National Congress opposed it and protests started all over the Bengal Petitions were signed and sent
to Government of India and Secretary of state.
Rabindranath Tagore composed “Amar Sonar Bangla” and it was sung by the crowds while marching in
the streets.
Bande Mataram from Bankim Chandra’s Anandamath became the theme song of this movement.
Both the Hindus and the Muslims observed Raksha Bandhan. Wristlets of coloured thread were exchanged
as a symbol of brotherhood, and the hearth kept unlit as a sign of mourning, called arandhan urged by
Ramendra Sunder Trivedi.
Surendranath Banerjee and Anand Mohan Bose addressed a huge gathering and within hours Rs 50000 was
raised for the movement.
Ananda Mohan Bose laid the foundation of Federation Hall to mark unity.
Congress Session at Benaras (1905):
Gopal Krishna Gokhale chaired the Congress session.
He condemned the idea of partition and supported the swadeshi and boycott movement.
Mr. Gokhale remarked that:
“Bengal’s heroic stand against the oppression of a harsh and uncontrolled bureaucracy has astonished
and gratified all India, and her sufferings have not been endured in vain, when they have helped to draw
closer all parts of the country in sympathy and aspiration.”
Extremists wanted to:
Extend the Boycott and Swadeshi movement outside Bengal.
Include all forms of associations such as Govt services, law courts, legislative councils, etc. within the
boycott Programme.
A strong resolution to support their programme.
Moderates wanted to:
Confine the movement to Bengal only.
Avoid boycotts of councils.
They rely on the constitutional method of protests.
Compromise Reached: A relatively mild resolution was passed condemning the partition of Bengal and
reactionary policy of Curzon and supporting swadeshi and boycott programmes in Bengal. This helped in
avoiding the split.
Extremists took the command:
They called for Passive resistance along with the Swadeshi and Boycott movement.
Tilak saw it as an opportunity to wage an all India struggle and a mass movement, he used Ganapati a nd
Shivaji festivals to propagate Swadeshi ideas.
The movement sparked to other provinces like Madras, Bombay etc.
5
The Swadeshi and Boycott movement was limited not only to Bengal, it soon spread to the rest of the
country.
Tilak took the movement to different parts of India, especially Poona and Bombay.
Ajit Singh and Lala Lajpat Rai in Punjab and Uttar Pradesh
Syed Haidar Raza in Delhi took the command of this movement.
Chidambaram Pillai and Bipin Chandra Pal contributed greatly in the spread of the movement in
Madras presidency.
Rawalpindi, Kangra, Jammu, Multan and Haridwar witnessed active participation.
Swadeshi Movement:
The anti-partition agitation soon enlarged into a more broad-based movement, known as the Swadeshi
movement.
Never before in the history of British India, was any measure of the government opposed so vehemently or
persistently with such unanimity.
Constructive Swadeshi
Political extremism
Revolutionary developments
Gradually it was realised that a more effective approach would need more precise tools.
The focus was on self-reliance. It gave a boost to Indian industry and business and also helped indigenous
craftsmen.
6
Suhrid
Sadhena Samitis
⮚ In Tamil Nadu, Swadeshi Sangam was formed by V.O Chidambaram Pillai, Subramania Siva to
mobilise the local masses.
⮚ These samitis arose the masses through magic lanterns, swadeshi songs, providing physical and moral
training to the members, social work during famines and epidemics, training in swadeshi crafts and
arbitration courts, organisation of schools.
National Education:
Bhagabat Chatuspathi of Satish chandra Mukherjee,
The Dawn Society,
The Saraswat Ayatan of Brahmabandhab upadhyay
Santiniketan Ashram of Rabindranath Tagore
15th August 1906 - A ‘National council of Education’ was set up.
Its aim was to organize a system of education (literary, scientific and technical on national lines
and under our control.
Bengal National College with Aurobindo Ghose as principal was started in Calcutta.
25 July 1906 Bengal Technical Institute was set up for technical education. (Later became College of
Engineering and Technology, Jadavpur)
Funds were raised to send students to Japan for advanced learning.
Bengal National school and college was established at Calcutta with Aurobindo Ghosh as principal.
Swadeshi Enterprises: Swadeshi textile mills, soap factories, banks, insurance companies, etc. were
established. These enterprises were driven by Swadeshi zeal and not with profit motive.
Mohini mills, Bange Laxmi cotton mills, calcutta potteries, National Tannery.
Impact on culture:
Tagore wrote Amar Sonar Bangla, which later became the national anthem of Bangladesh.
In Tamil Nadu, Subramania Bharti (also known as Bharathiyar) wrote Sudesh Geetam.
Use of Festivals and Melas: Leaders especially Tilak used Shivaji and Ganpati festivals to propagate
nationalist ideas and mobilise the masses.
There was a flowering of nationalist poetry, prose and Journalism.
Folk theatre like Jatras were popularized.
Bengali folk music like Palligeet and Jarigan.
Fairy tales such as Thakurmar Jhuli (written by Dakshinarajan Mitra Majumdar).
In painting, Abanindranath Tagore broke the domination of Victorian naturalism over the Indian art
scene and drew inspiration from Ajanta, Mughal and Rajput paintings.
Indian Society of Oriental Art was founded by brothers Gaganendranath Tagore and
Abanindranath Tagore in Calcutta in 1907. Following annual exhibitions of the Tagore School of
Art, showing the latest works of artists in the new movement in Indian painting (initiated by
Abanindranath Tagore, under the guidance of E.B. Havell) at the Government School of Art, Calcutta,
the Indian Society of Oriental Art was founded in 1907.
Lord Kitchener was President.
Norman Blount and Abanindranath Tagore (Secretaries)
Nandlal Bose became the first recipient of scholarship offered by Indian Society of Oriental Art.
Subramania Bharti
Chinnaswami Subramania Bharathi, also known as Bharathiyar (1882 – 1921), was a Tamil writer, poet,
journalist, Indian independence activist and a social reformer.
The Government of India in 1987 instituted a highest National Subramanyam Bharti Award conferred along
with the Ministry of Human Resource Development, annually confers on writers of outstanding works in Hindi
literature.
His notable works were Achamillai acchamillai, Panchali Sapatham, Pappa Pattu, Kannan Pattu, Kuyil Pattu,
etc. His poems and hymns were based on diverse themes like patriotism, relationship between man and god,
Russian and French revolutions, children, devotional, etc. He translated Vedic hymns, Bhagavad Gita and
Patanjali’s Yoga Sutra into Tamil.
9
Between 1919-24, he was the member of the Viceroy's Executive Council and managed
Education Member, later health and law
Setting up of the Muslim University of Aligarh.
Acting Vice-President of the Governor-General's Executive Council 1922-25.
In 1925, he was honoured with the Knight Commander of the Order of the Star of India (KCSI).
In 1927 Muslim league session in Lahore and supported the government in the Simon commission.
In 1930-31 he attended the first Round Table Conference.
Labour Participation:
1905: 250 Bengali clerks of Burn company, Howrah protested against derogatory work conditions.
There were Strikes in tramways, printing presses and Jute mills.
In October 1905, the Printer’s union (labour union) was formed
1906: Strikes were organised in East India Railway leading to formation of Railwaymen’s union.
1906-08: Frequent strikes in jute mills were observed. Indian Millhands Union, Budge Budge was formed
organised by Ashwini Coomar Bannerji.
In Tuticorin and Tirunelveli, Subramania Siva and Chidambaram Pillai led strikes in foreign-owned cotton
mills.
Lala Lajpat Rai and Ajit Singh led Railway strikes in Rawalpindi (Punjab)
Main Leaders of the Labour Participations were
Ashwini Coomar Bannerjee
Prabhat Kusum Roy Chowdhary
Althanasius Apurba Kumar Ghosh
The participation of peasants was negligible, only Barisal was an exception.
Outside Bengal:
All India reach was a significant feature of the movement. Leaders like Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai, Ajit
Singh (Bhagat Singh’s uncle) played a pivotal role in spreading the movement outside Bengal.
During this time, the extremists’ ideas were propagated by
New India: Bipin Chandra Pal (Editor)
Vande Mataram: Aurobindo Ghosh (Editor)
Sandhya: Brahmabandhab Upadhyay (Editor)
Yugantar: Bhupendranath Dutta (Editor)
12
How the Swadeshi movement proved to be a major turning point in the history of the Indian Freedom
struggle?
Participation: Hitherto untouched sections of society such as students, women workers, etc. participated
actively in the movement. From now on they were to form the base for all the upcoming national
movements.
Techniques of struggle: From moderation to extremism, from revolutionary activities to incipient socialism,
from prayers, petition to passive resistance and non-cooperation, all the techniques of struggle emerged
during the Swadeshi movement.
13
Diversification: The movement was not only confined to the political sphere but also brought in its fold,
literature, art, science and industry.
Readied the masses: It prepared the masses to take bold political positions in future and participate actively
in the upcoming freedom struggles.
Ideology: The movement undermined the colonial ideologies and institutions.
A lesson for future: The future struggle was to draw heavily from the experience gained during the
swadeshi movement.
Moderates Extremists
They were opposed to the idea of an all India They converted it into mass struggle.
struggle. Their popularity helped them to reach masses and
Their methods were not proving fruitful. were more effective. They were demanding Swaraj
They were still negotiating with the British for
reforms while the movement was on.
December 1906:
The Congress session at Calcutta was headed by Dadabhai Naoroji, he was respected by both the Moderates
and the Extremists, so split was avoided
Dadabhai Naoroji declared that the goal of the Indian National Congress is self-government or swaraj
like the U.K or the colonies of Australia or Canada.
14
What made extremists and moderates think that it would be beneficial to part their ways?
After the Calcutta session extremists gave a call for wide passive resistance including boycott of schools,
colleges, councils, courts, etc.
The extremists thought that the people have been aroused and the time has come to drive the Britishers out.
Extremists on the other hand failed to realise that their plan of action needed the shield of protection
from moderates in order to prevent them from Govt repression.
Moderates on the other hand were lured by the council reform about to come and wanted to slow down the
movement.
At this stage moderates thought that it would be dangerous to associate themselves with the extremists.
15
Moderates felt that the activities of extremists would annoy the liberals in power in England which might
affect the council reform about to come.
Moderates here failed to realise that the council reform was only meant to create a divide in the
Congress.
Reaction of the Government:
Government resorted to severe actions to crush the movement.
Even singing of Vande Mataram was banned. Meetings were restricted.
Tilak was tried for sedition in 1908 and sentenced to six years of jail for his writing in Kesari about the
bomb thrown in Muzaffarpur by Khudiram Bose and Prafulla Chaki.
The suppression:
In 1907, Lala Lajpat Rai and Ajit Singh were deported to Mandalay for riots in Punjab. Later Lala left for
Britain.
In 1908 Krishna Kumar Mitra and Ashwini Kumar Dutt were deported.
After being acquitted Aurobindo Ghosh retired to Pondicherry to start his ashrams.
With the loss of Extremists leaders, Congress lost their touch with masses.
December, 1911:
King George V visited India and Delhi Durbar was held for coronation Here it was decided to transfer
the capital and annulment of the partition was announced.
It was hoped that this would restore peace and dampen the spirit of nationalism.
16
Small Concept:
Congress Session of 1907, 1908: Rashbihari Ghosh was the president of Indian National Congress’s Surat
session in 1907 and the Madras session of 1908.
In 1908: The Congress delegate for now to be elected only by the Congress committee and associations
affiliated to the Congress. It resulted in the members of the Extremist party not attending the Congress
session called as Mehta Session/Congress.
He was a politician, lawyer, social activist and philanthropist. He was one of the most vocal opponents of
radicalism or extremism and was part of the moderates.
17
In India, on 24 March 1909, Mr. Satyendra Sinha was appointed a member of the Viceroy in the
Executive Council.
Provisions of the Act: The size of the Legislatures, both at the Centre and in the Provinces, was enlarged
and so were their functions.
Central Legislature: The number of 'additional' members here was now raised at the maximum to 60. The
Legislature was thus to consist of 69 members of whom 37 were to be officials while the remaining 32 non
officials.
Of the officials, 9 were to be the ex-officio members, namely the Governor-General, seven ordinary
members (Executive Councilors) and one extraordinary member [commander-in-chief], while the
remaining 28 were to be nominated by the Governor General. Of the 32 non-officials, 5 were to be
nominated by the Governor-General while the remaining 27 were to be elected.
For the elected members, it was declared that the territorial representation did not suit India and that
representation by classes and interests is the only practicable method of embodying the elective
principle in the constitution of the Indian Legislative Councils.
Thus, of the 27 elected members, 13 were to come from the General Electorates,
consisting of the non-official members of the legislatures of Bombay, Madras, Bengal and United
Provinces, each of which would send two members (=8).
the non-official members of the legislatures of the Central Provinces, Assam, Bihar and Orissa, the
Punjab and Burma, each of which would send one member (=5).
Of the remaining 14,
12 were to come from Class Electorates;
Six of them coming one each from the Landholders' constituencies in the six provinces of
Bombay, Madras, Bengal, Bihar and Orissa, United Provinces and the Central Provinces; and
Six being returned by the separate Muslim constituencies—one each from Madras, Bombay,
United Provinces and Bihar and Orissa (=4) and two from Bengal.
The remaining 2 were to be returned from the Special electorates, one each from the Bengal and
Bombay Chambers of Commerce.
Provincial Legislatures:
The membership of the Legislative Councils of the different provinces was enlarged under the Act of
1909 was as follows: Burma, 16; Eastern Bengal and Assam, 41, Bengal, 52; Madras, Bombay and
United Provinces, 47 each; and Punjab, 25.
19
The Act provided for non-official majorities in the provinces. However, this did not mean non-official
elected majorities, as some of the non-officials were to be nominated by the Governors and through
these the official control over the Council was retained.
In Madras, for example, the number of the non-officials was 26, while that of the officials 21. Of the
non- officials, however, only 21 were to be elected, while the remaining five were to be nominated by
the Governor.
As these nominated members always sided with the Government, the officials were 'in a manner of
speaking in the majority'. The same was true of all other provinces.
The elected members in the Provincial Legislatures were to be returned by different constituencies.
In Bombay, for instance, out of the 21 elected members,
6 were to be returned by the Special electorates consisting of the Bombay Corporation and the
Bombay University etc.,
8 were to be returned by the General electorates consisting of District Boards and Municipalities
etc. and
The remaining 7 were to be returned by Class electorates consisting of Muslims (returning 4) and
the Landlords (returning 3).
The membership of the Executive Councils of Bengal, Madras and Bombay was raised to 4 and the
Government was empowered to constitute similar Councils for the Lieutenant-Governors as well.
Rules were also laid down concerning discussion of matters of general public interest.
Members could discuss these matters, moving resolutions on them and could also vote,
Though the President was empowered to disallow the whole or a part of such resolutions, without
assigning any reason.
Nor was the Government obliged to accept such resolutions, even if passed, whether concerning public
interest or concerning financial statements.
There were, however, certain subjects which the members could not discuss under the Act. They could
not discuss the foreign relations of the Government of India and its relations with the Indian Princes, a
matter under adjudication of a court of law, expenditure on state railways, interest on debt etc.
Assessment of the Act: The Reform of 1909 afforded no answer and could afford no answer to the Indian
political problem.
Narrow franchises, indirect elections, limited powers of the Legislative Councils made a hotchpotch
of representative government. The real power remained with the Government and the Councils were left
with no functions but criticism.
The Reforms created new problems in Indian politics. One such problem was the introduction of
separate electorates for Muslims , by which, according to Jawaharlal Nehru, a "political barrier was
created around them, isolating them from the rest of India and reversing the unifying and amalgamating
process which had been going on for centuries”.
The Reforms of 1909 gave to the people of the country "the shadow rather than the substance." They
granted influence and not power. It left responsibility for government on one set of men while rapidly
transferring power to another set of men. It created a situation eminently calculated to exasperate the
executive and legislature with each other and thereby threw the British Government and the Indian
community at large into a posture of mutual antagonism.
This act was certainly a landmark in the history of India. Only eight years later the British Government had to
declare that she aimed at giving responsible government to India.
The inclusion of Indians in the legislative and Executive Councils of the Governor-General gave them a good
chance to give publicity to the ideas that had come into existence as a result of the national awakening in
India.
Thus, the act has a great significance, though it did not introduce any responsible government. But it was a
milestone in the direction of a responsible government.
Criticism of the Indian Council Act 1909:
The Minto-Morley Reforms of 1909 aimed at winning the cooperation of the Congress and at suppressing the
revolutionaries.
Though, at first, this act assured great hopes to the Indian leaders , yet it came to be criticized severely on
account of its serious defects. The restricted and communal electorates duped all hopes.
This act has been criticized on the following grounds:
1. No Responsible Government: The act did not establish any responsible government. Lord Morley never
aimed at granting responsible government to India. The Legislative Councils were given some more
powers only. The people got nothing and all the power remained still centralized.
Lord Morley said — “If it could be said that this chapter of reforms led directly or necessarily upto
the establishment of the parliamentary system in India, I, for me, would have nothing at all to do
with it.”
The people remained dissatisfied as they got nothing worthwhile. These reforms introduced
parliamentary structure but the responsibility remained absent. The executive was not made
responsible to the legislature.
2. Communal Electorates: This act introduced communal electorates. The Muslims came to have separate
electorates. They could vote for Muslim candidates only. Thus, the seeds of communalism were sown.
The elected candidates were never nationalist leaders. Later on Muslims came to have separate reserved
seats in the government jobs even. This communa l feeling went on gathering momentum. The acts of
1919 and 1935 extended these communal electorates to Sikhs and Indian Christians also. This communal
feeling reached its climax in course of time and culminated in the partition of India in 1947.
3. Narrow Franchise: This act introduced the system of indirect elections. The people got the right of
sending their representatives to Legislative Councils but they got no share in the government. Very few
people had the right to vote. The qualification for vote varied from place to place and from religion to
religion. Moreover, the elected candidates had no voice. They were kept in minority. The women were
not given any representation.
22
4. Indirect Elections: The indirect system of election was another crowning defect of this act. The people
elected members for the local bodies and they further elected for Legislative Councils of the provinces.
These provincial legislators elected members for the Central Legislative Councils. Thus, people got no
representation in the government indeed. These elections were a mere shadow and had no reality or
substance in them.
5. Limited Powers of the Legislatures: Though the powers of the legislative councils were increased, yet
this increase was only nominal. In reality the powers of these councils were very limited. The legislators
could ask questions from the executive who were not bound to give answers. The legislators could pass
resolutions on public matters but their resolutions were no more than recommendations as the
government was not bound to accept them. They could discuss the budgets but with no powers to have a
direct control on the finance. Thus, the powers of the Legislature were very narrow and the government
was autocratic in nature.
6. Weakness of Non-official Members: Though in the provincial council, the non-official members were
to be in majority, yet they possessed no power. The official and nominated non-official members were
together more than the elected members and they were easily outvoted. However advisable arguments or
proposals might be advanced by these non-official members, at the time of voting they were opposed by
the official and nominated members. The main function of the official members was — “to vote with the
government and to vote against the non-official opposition.”
7. No Encouragement to Self-government: The people could directly vote for the local bodies and so the
people wanted the government to announce that the ultimate aim of the reforms was to grant self-
government to Indians. But it is a pity that these reforms remained silent on this point.
8. Curtailed Rights: The Governor-General-in-Council and the Governors-in-Council could frame rules
and regulations for the division of duties. These rules were so framed as to deprive the non-official
members of any substantial rights. These rules disabled several revolutionary members to fight elections.
Thus, these reforms could not alter the despotic nature of the government with the result that the masses
remained discontented and hence the short life of the act.
The communal electorates forced the elected members even to be faithful to the government so that they
might secure the interests of their communities. The Indians had little share in the government. The local
bodies which had been subjected to strict government control under the reactionary government of Curzon
were not emancipated so far.
So, these reforms could not meet the satisfaction of the Indians. The extremists felt all the more disgusted
and carried on their activities of terrorism. The demand of Swaraj gathered momentum as a result of the utter
failure of these reforms.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture - 33
Extremists Era III – Home Rule
and Government of India Act
1919
2
Extremists Era III – Home Rule and Government of India Act 1919
⮚ She came to attend the Madras Session of the Congress in 1914, which was presided by
Bhupendranath Bose.
⮚ She said quite candidly that India neither wants to live like a baby in the imperialist creche nor does she
pray for independence in return for her tears. The movement demanded justice from the Empire as a
sovereign state and considered freedom as her birthright.
Tilak’s League:
❖ It was set up in April 1916 and was restricted to Maharashtra, Karnataka,
Central provinces and Berar.
❖ Poona was the headquarters of Tilak’s league.
❖ It had six branches.
❖ Its demands were Swaraj, formation of linguistic state and education
in vernacular.
Besant’s League:
❖ It was set up in September, 1916 in Madras and covered the rest of India
(including Bombay city).
❖ George Arundale was its organising secretary.
❖ B.W Wadia and C.P Ramaswamy Aiyer were also associated with it
❖ It had 200 branches and was loosely organised as compared to Tilak’s league.
❖ Mrs. Besant through her papers ‘New India’ and ‘Common Weal’ and Tilak through ‘Kesari’ and
‘Maratha’ started the propagation of the Home Rule Movement.
❖ It carried a much wider appeal than the earlier movements did.
❖ It also attracted the politically backward regions of Gujarat and Sindh.
❖ The main objectives were -
⮚ To attain Home rule for India within British empire
⮚ Same as that of Australia and New Zealand.
⮚ Tilak declared “Swaraj of today is within the empire and not independent of it”.
4
⮚ It spread its ideas through political discussions, organising reading rooms and libraries, newspaper,
posters, religious songs.
Realisation:
❖ Moderates
⮚ They realised the importance of masses into any struggle.
⮚ They needed extremists so as to reach the masses.
⮚ Tilak was already active in the Home Rule Movement.
⮚ Gokhale and Ferozeshah Mehta had died in 1915.
❖ Congress
⮚ They recognised the importance of Muslim League.
⮚ They needed a united front to counter the British.
❖ Extremists
⮚ Tilak realised that he needed the shield of moderates.
⮚ He also requires the all-India political network for the success of any movement.
❖ Muslim League
⮚ They realised that the welfare of Muslims was not possible under the Imperial regime.
⮚ The global events shifted the alliance of Muslims away from the British.
⮚ Partition of Bengal was finally annulled in 1911.
Lucknow Pact:
❖ The Congress and Muslim League decided to resolve their differences.
❖ The gulf between Hindus and Muslims was bridged.
❖ A joint scheme of reforms was adopted by both parties.
❖ The congress agreed to separate electorates for the Muslims and the league accepted the congress creed
of Swaraj.
❖ But it happened to be a temporary truce as Dr. R.C. Mazumdar has rightly remarked. “it laid the foundation on
which Pakistan was built thirty years later”.
❖ Tried to develop public opinion through discussion, reading, pamphlets and lectures on mass scale and with
high intensity.
❖ Fresh groups of people joined the national movement like urban professionals
⮚ Also, the new generation of Nehru joined the struggle
⮚ Many leaders like Motilal Nehru, Jawaharlal Nehru, Bhulabhai Desai, C.R. Das, Madan Mohan
Malaviya, Mohammad Ali Jinnah, Tej Bahadur Sapru and Lala Lajpat Rai also joined this movement.
❖ The government got worried at the wide popularity of the movement and it came down with severe repression.
Mohammad Ali Jinnah, for his untiring effort to forge unity between Hindu and Muslim Indians, Sarojini Naidu gave
him the title of “The Ambassador of Hindu-Muslim Unity”.
3. Help in War remained unrewarded: The Indians had given unconditional co-operation to the English in
World War I. Huge assistance in men and money was given to the British. The Indian soldiers went overseas
to fight for the English. The Indian Exchequer was utilized by the British. The native princes made huge
contributions. The Indians now expected extensive rights of self-government in return.
4. Home Rule Movements: The British government, against the wishes of the Indian people, showed no sign of
giving anything to the Indians. Tilak and Mrs. Annie Besant started the Home Rule Movement. Tilak asserted
that freedom was the birthright of Indians. This movement alarmed the British as the Indians attacked their
sympathies with the movement. A general discontent prevailed.
August Declaration:
❖ As discussed earlier it was declared on 20 Aug 1917 by the Secretary of State Edwin Montague in the House
of commons regarding future political reforms.
❖ The Declaration Titled
⮚ “Increasing association of Indians in every branch of administration, and the Gradual development of self-
governing Institutions with a view to the progressive realization of responsible governments in India as
an Integral part of the British Empire”.
❖ The Secretary of State came to India in November 1917 and discussed his scheme of reforms with the Viceroy,
Lord Chelmsford, and some eminent British civil servants and Indian politicians of all shades of opinion.
❖ A committee was appointed consisting of
⮚ Sir William Duke,
⮚ Earl of Donoughmore,
⮚ Bhupendra Nath Basu and
10
⮚ Charles Robert
❖ The MP who had put the Question in the Commons in reply to which the Secretary of State had made the
Declaration which together with the Viceroy, helped Montagu to prepare the draft of a reform scheme which
was published in July 1918 and is called the Montagu-Chelmsford (the Montford) Report on the basis of which
the Government of India Act 1919 was drafted.
Margaret Cousins:
❖ Margaret Cousins, the General Secretary of WIA responded to the Commission's
decision in a letter to the editor of The Hindu:
⮚ "On behalf of the members of the 46 Branches of the Women's Indian
Association, all of which have signed requisitions in favour of women
suffrage, I protest vigorously against the decision of the Southborough
Committee that the franchisee shall not be extended to women because,
forsooth, "the social conditions of India make it premature". Is this
handful of men better able to judge these conditions than were the thousands
of Indian delegates to the Bombay and Delhi Congresses? These latter were
the fathers, husbands, brothers, and sons of the women concerned and
knowing at first hand their social conditions, with full understanding of what
the necessary steps to women's voting would be... Are the considered
opinions of these representative bodies of Indian men and women to be flouted by these few Committee
members, some of the Englishmen already known to be opposed to the grant of the vote even to their own
Englishwomen and who are thus dated as behind the times?"
2. Home Administration: Headed by Robert Crewe-Milnes, 1st Marquess of Crewe, and recommended "the
reorganisation of the Council of India, the appointment of High Commissioner for India in London, and placing
of charges on account of political and administrative work of Indian office on the British exchequer.
3. Feetham Function Committee: headed by Richard Feetham, and recommended "the allocation of subjects
between the centre and the provinces", as well as "the division of provincial subjects into the Reserved and
Transferred categories.
❖ The Act laid down in its Preamble the principles on which the reforms were to be progressively carried out in
India. These principles were more or less the same as embodied in the Declaration of August 20, 1917.
❖ An analysis of the Preamble brings out the following points:
⮚ British India is to remain an integral part of the British Empire.
⮚ Responsible Government in British India is the objective of the declared policy of Parliament.
⮚ Responsible Government is capable of progressive realisation only.
12
The curtailment of the powers and functions of the Secretary of State was done; it appears, in deference to the wishes
of the Congress which had passed a resolution at the 1916 session that "India must be governed from Delhi and
Shimla and not from Whitehall and Downing Street." The Act, however, met these wishes in a very small way.
▪ These were borrowing and taxing powers of local self-governing bodies, supplies and irrigation,
industrial matters including factories, electricity, etc.
✓ The chief executive authority still remained with the Governor General, who was a
representative of the Crown and was constantly in correspondence with the Secretary of State for
India.
✓ He exercised full control over his Councillors and enjoyed vast powers over the country. Thus, the
wishes of the people of the country in respect of the appointment, powers and functions of the
Governor-General were ignored in the Act.
❖ Changes on the Legislative side:
⮚ The Act set up a bicameral legislature at the Centre in place of the Imperial Council consisting of one
House. The two Houses now were to be the Council of State and the Central Legislative Assembly.
✓ The Council of State which was to be the Upper House was to consist of 60 members, 26 of
whom were to be nominated by the Governor-General and 34 were to be elected, introducing thereby
an elected majority.
▪ The 26 nominated members were to consist of 20 officials and 6 non-officials, while of the 34
elected members, 20 were to be elected by General constituencies, 10 by the Muslims, 3 by the
Europeans, and 1 by the Sikh constituencies.
▪ The Council of State was renewed partially every year, though a member held his seat for five
years.
▪ Its President was to be nominated by the Viceroy and its members were called "Honourable".
▪ Women were not entitled to become its members.
▪ The Governor-General could address the House, and he could summon, prorogue or dissolve
the house.
⮚ The franchise was extremely restricted.
✓ Income tax on the minimum income of Rs 10,000 a year or those paying minimum land revenue of Rs.
750 a year were entitled to vote.
✓ Either a person must be on the Senate of a University or he must have some past experience in some
Legislative Council of India, or he must be a title-holder.
✓ In 1920 the Population was 24 crores, but eligible to vote not more than 17,364
15
⮚ The Act did not grant women suffrage, but included a clause that Indian provinces could enfranchise
women if they chose to do so. Furthermore, it did not allow women to stand in elections.
⮚ The Legislative Assembly which was to constitute the Lower House was to consist of
✓ 145 members, of whom 41 were to be nominated and 104 elected. Of the 41 nominated members,
26 were officials and 15 non-officials.
✓ Of the 104 elected members, 52 were to be returned by the General constituencies, 32 by the
Communal constituencies 30 by the Muslims and 2 by the Sikhs, and 20 by the Special
constituencies, 7 by the landholders, 9 by the Europeans and 4 by the Indian Commercial community.
✓ The life of the Assembly was to be three years but it could be extended by the Governor-General.
✓ NOTE: the last Assembly elected in 1936 was dissolved after ten years.
✓ The franchise here was much restricted though as compared to the Council of State it was not so
high.
✓ The minimum qualifications
▪ Either a person must be an occupant or an owner of a house of the minimum annual rental value
of Rs. 180, or
▪ He must be paying the municipal tax of Rs. 15 a year, or
▪ Must be paying an income tax on an income of not less than Rs. 2,000 a year or
▪ He must be paying a land revenue of at least Rs. 50 a year.
16
▪ The number of persons who thus became entitled to vote stood at 909,874 in 1920.
➢ Distribution of seats among the different provinces was made on the basis of their so-called importance
and not on the basis of their population.
▪ For instance, both the Punjab and Bihar and Orissa were granted 12 seats each though the
population of the Punjab was only 2\3rd of that of Bihar and Orissa. The reason was the military
importance of the Punjab.
▪ Bombay and Madras were granted 16 seats each though the population of Bombay was only
half of that of Madras. The reason here was the commercial importance of Bombay.
Comparative Study of the Various Acts after Government of India Act 1858:
Indian Council Act 1861 Indian Council Act 1892 Indian Council Act Government of India Act
1909 1919
❖ Forbidden to transact ❖ Express their views on ❖ The budgets could ❖ The Central Legislature,
any business except the financial statements now be discussed constituted of the
consideration and which were henceforth elaborately. above-mentioned two
enactment of legislative to be made on the floor ❖ Resolutions on Houses, was supposed
measures before them. of the legislature, taxation, loans etc. to have been given very
❖ Can't entertain any ❖ Although they were not could be moved. wide powers.
motion except a motion empowered to move ❖ The members could ❖ It could legislate for the
for leave to introduce a resolutions or divide ask questions and whole of British India,
bill or having reference the house in respect of supplementary for the Indian subjects
to a bill actually any financial question. questions. -- and servants of the
introduced. ❖ However, they were Matters of public Government, whether
❖ Can't inquire into empowered to put interest could be inside or outside the
grievances, call for questions within certain discussed. country.
information or examine limits to the ❖ Though no ❖ It could repeal or amend
the conduct of the Government on matters discussion could any law already existing
executive. of public interest after take place on in the country.
17
❖ The powers of the provinces were enlarged. Though the diarchy introduced by it and the encouragement
given by it to the communal electoral system constitute serious defects of this act, yet this act is an important
milestone in the constitutional development of India.
❖ It promised responsible government to the Indians and extended the powers of the provinces. The elected
members came to be in majority in the provincial Legislature.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 34
Gandhian Era
2
Gandhian Era
Albert Einstein on Mahatma Gandhi:
”A leader of his people, unsupported by any outward authority; a politician whose success rests not upon craft
nor the mastery of technical devices, but simply on the convincing power of his personality; a victorious
fighter who has always scorned the use of force; a man of wisdom and humility, armed with resolve and
inflexible consistency, who has devoted all his strength to the uplifting of his people and the betterment of
their lot; a man who has confronted the brutality of Europe with the dignity of the simple human being, and
thus at all times risen superior.”
Early Life of Gandhiji:
Mahatma Gandhi (1869-1948), so pervasively dominated the
Indian scenario from 1919 to 1948 that this period is called the
‘Gandhian era’ in Indian history.
He was born at Porbandar on 2nd Oct 1869.
He married at 13 years of age to Kasturba Bai.
He completed a degree of law from England. He joined the Bar
in England in 1891.
Gandhiji’s patriotic sentiments were markedly reinforced by
his long stay abroad.
He spent about three years-from October 1888 to June 1891- as a student in England.
He was in South Africa almost continuously from 1893 to 1914.
According to Sumit Sarkar,
“The South African experience contributed in a number of different ways to the foundations of
Gandhian ideology and methods as well as to his later achievement in India. This involved careful
training of disciplined cadres (in the phoenix settlement and the Tolstoy Farm), non-violent
Satyagraha involving peaceful violation of specific laws (compulsory registration, entry permits, trade
licences etc.), mass courting of arrests, and occasional hartals and spectacular marches”.
Personal Life:
He belonged to the Vaishya family and was highly influenced by Jainism and due to this he adopted
vegetarianism.
Early Phase
Inspired by plays Shravana Pitrabhakti Nataka and Harishchandra.
Married to Kasturbai at the age of 13.
3
In England
In 1884 went to England to study law, vegetarianism was a sizzling topic there inspired from “A plea
for Vegetarianism” by HS Salts. Gandhi joined the Vegetarian Society in England.
During the time with the theologist he was asked to join it, he declined by saying “With my meagre
knowledge of my own religion I do not want to belong to any religious body”.
He came in contact with theosophists like Madame Blavatsky and Mrs. Besant. Edwin Arnold’s translation
work “The Song Celestial” and “The light of Asia”, “Key to Theosophy” by Blavatsky.
He met Narayan Hemachandra (Gujarati poet) and Debendranath Tagore.
Trying some temporary jobs in India, in 1893 he went to Durban (Natal Province) in connection
with the Dada Abdullah and Co. case.
Indentured Labour
During the 1860s, to work in sugarcane cultivation in South Africa, white planters asked permission from
the Indian Government to recruit workers over native Zulus for cultivation in Natal under indenture of 5
years. After expiration they can settle and enjoy full rights.
As time passed Indian outgrew and became enterprising, held on trade and became owner of land that
antagonised Europeans.
In South Africa:
In 1893 reached South Africa (1st Indian Barrister to arrive in South Africa) and
stayed for 20 years there fighting against apartheid and fighting for the rights of the
Indian community.
Dada Abdulla, an Indian businessman invited him to become legal advisor. Gandhiji
faced severe racism there and decided to take a stand.
Indians in South Africa: There were mainly 3 categories of Indians:
a. The Indentured labour mainly from South and North India who migrated to
South Africa after 1890 to work in sugar plantations. They were known as
Girmitiyas (closely related to word agreement).
b. The Merchants, mainly the Muslims.
c. The ex-indentured labourers who had settled there with their children after the
expiry of their contract.
4
Indians in South Africa were subject to inhuman racial discrimination. They were:
called coolies
marriages were not recognised
undue taxes were laid. (According to Transvaal legislation of 1885 Indians had to pay 3 Euro for entry
into Transvaal.
derogatory rules were imposed. For Ex- Denial of right to vote , they could reside in certain prescribed
locations only which were congested and insanitary, they couldn’t stay outdoors after 9 pm, could not use
public footpaths, etc.
Moderate Phase:
Launched Protest against discriminatory Natal Assembly Bill of 1894 also known as Disfranchisement Bill
or Franchise Bill which aimed to snatch the rights of Indians to elect members at Natal Legislative
Assembly. But the Natal government passed an amendment form.
5
Gandhi constituted a committee for formulating a plan that was considered as Gandhi’s first struggle in
South Africa., Gandhi sent a petition to England signed by Indians to the Secretary of State for colonies
(Lord Ripon) got support from masses and the media bill vetoed. Bill was passed with amendment ignoring
Indian opposition.
The formation of Natal Indian Congress (NIC) in 1894 for association of Indians in struggle against
discrimination. A debating society named Colonial-born Indian Educational Association formed as an
offshoot of NIC.
During the Formation of Natal Indian Congress, Gandhi wrote two pamphlets.
1. An appeal to every Briton in South Africa.
2. Indian Franchise-An Appeal
Frustrated by the growing trade by Indians in Natal. The Natal government imposed an annual tax of 25
Euro on each indentured Indian. NIC raised this issue and the Indian government (Viceroy Elgin) put down
this proposal but allowed the Natal government to impose a poll tax of 3 Euro. After 20 years this tax was
abolished under Indian Relief Act 1914.
Gathering support from India for the condition of indentured Indians in SA Gandhi went to India in 1896 and
wrote Green Pamphlet (green colour). He met various leaders, reformers, media, newspapers publishers to
raise the issue and as a result it gained attention in various parts of the world. Aftermath of this step Gandhi
was caught and lynched by European mob.
During the Boer war (1899-1902) Gandhi formed a group of volunteers known as Natal Indian Ambulance
Corps to take care of the wounded for which Gandhiji was awarded the 'Kaiser-i-Hind'.
In 1902, Gandhi resumed his struggle, established office in Johannesburg (largest population of Indian
concentrated) and later shifted to Phoenix, Durban. In 1903 started the journal Indian Opinion published by
Mansukhlal Nazar.
Gandhi’s Ambulance Corps also contributed to the war between the Zulu Rebellion (Bambatha) and
Britishers in 1906.
Autobiography of Gandhi “My Experiment with Truth” is a combination of weekly articles published by him
in Navjivan.
It finally led to negotiations between Gandhi and Hardinge, General Smut and C.F. Andrews.
The South African government considered major demands.
General smuts passed India Relief Act 1914 by which:
abolished poll tax on freed labours
marriages accepted
domicile certificate only required for entering in Union of South Africa
Techniques of Gandhiji:
It means invitation It’s the duty of Disobey unjust laws Hindu-Muslim unity
or holding on to virtuous man to not and tyrants. program.
truth. to cooperate with Extreme political Upliftment of women.
Based on doctrines evil doers. agitation. Village reconstructions.
of truth and non- It is a mild form of As per him, more Harijan welfare.
violence. agitation. dangerous than
● Promotion of Khadi.
Inspired by armed rebellion.
Thoreau, Emerson
and Tolstoy.
It involved Fasting
and Hartal.
9
Gandhi's Ideology:
For Ashis Nandy, he was a “counter modernist critic of the west.”.
For Bhikhu Parekh, “a critique of modern civilization”.
He made Satya and Ahimsa as the basis of the new social order that he envisaged.
Freedom for India was to be won through non-violence and non-cooperation with the evil-doer.
He believed in the superiority of the means and laid emphasis on practice than on theory.
Gandhi’s Philosophy
His Philosophy was based on
Vaishnav and Jainism
Henry David Thoreau
John Ruskin
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Leo Tolstoy
He believed that philosophy must be rooted in India and its ancient civilization.
The religion also had strong influence over him, he used religious idioms to mobilise masses (But it was not
revivalism of extremist phase).
His Goal was moral and utopian, also unattainable and ever elusive.
Swaraj, according to him, was a political goal, but never defined.
Spiritualistic thoughts:
His method was highly empirical and pragmatic
Various Aspects of Gandhian Ideology
Satyagraha
Ahimsa
Swaraj
Swadeshi
Sarvodaya
Gandhi’s method of Mass Mobilisation:
Trained and disciplined cadres
Adopting Satyagraha
Social reform and constructive program
10
World War - I
During this time, quintessentially the defence expenditure increased.
There was a huge national debt that was more than 3 mn (1914-1923). In the form of War loans and takes.
There were under production of food crops because of crop failures in 1918-19 and 1920-21 that affected UP,
Punjab, Bombay, Central Province, Bihar, Orissa along with the food exports to war fronts and outbreak of
influenza epidemic
In the 1921 Census it is estimated that nearly 12 - 13 mn people died.
To counter this financial crisis the Britishers put indirect taxation on trade and industry and also imposed
higher custom duties on companies excess profit tax.
There was a forced recruitment to army
11
The Price/Profit from Agricultural export did not increase at same pace, hence,
decline in export
stockpiles
commercial crops acreage
Market crisis arose in 1917-19 and it led to various peasants’ protests, for example the Kisan Sabha
movement in UP in 1918.
Growth of Industries took place Jute in the British Capital and Textiles in the Indian capital in Bombay and
Ahmedabad.
Both the fiscal requirement and nationalist pressure forced the British to change in official policy towards
industrialisation.
Business magnates were loyal to the British.
Growth of the working class rose between 1911 – 1921 to 575K. They were affected by price rise and
frequent strikes affected all the centres.
Gandhi was awarded the Kaisar-e-Hind Gold Medal in 1915 by lord Hardinge (returned in 1920 for the
Jallianwala massacre).
He met with Sarojini Naidu and motivated her to put all efforts in her club the Lyceum which was
manufacturing clothes for soldiers.
Then Gandhi had an attack of pleurisy and was advised by Dr. Jivraj Mehta to return to India. Gandhi was
still ill when Gokhale returned to India. Gandhiji returned as well.
Kaisar-i-Hind Medal awarded by the British monarch to civilians of any nationality who rendered
distinguished service in the advancement of the interests of the British Raj.
Return of Gandhiji:
9th Jan 1915: He came back to India at the call of Gokhale
(his political Guru) and was given a warm welcome for his
partial victory in South Africa. Henceforth, irrespective of the
ebbs and peaks of the national struggle, Gandhiji acquired an
almost legendary fame and popularity among the Indian
masses that cut across religions, regional and communal lines.
Initially he took little interest in political matters.
Incident of Gandhi-1:
Viramgam Custom line, a tariff cordon between Kathiawar and British states, railway passengers was
harassed. Gandhi took this case and met with Lord Chelmsford after which cordon was removed this
marked the advent of Satyagraha in India.
13
Incident of Gandhi-2
Tax on immigrants was abolished in 1914 in Natal. To abolish indenture labour Madan Mohan Malviya
passed a resolution in the Imperial Legislative Council for abolition but put it down. Gandhi started
touring India and raised this issue, feeling pressured by the government to abolish it. This was the second
case when the objective was achieved by the preparedness of Satyagraha.
Analysis
Champaran was considered the first battle of civil disobedience in India.
Massive supporters gathered from the peasant class along with the educated middle class.
15
Gandhiji got an understanding of the ground level culture like communication in local languages,
psychological analysis to gain support.
Gandhi emerged as leader of the downtrodden.
Brajkishore Prasad or "vakil babu" went on to become one of Gandhi’s most "esteemed" co-workers in
Champaran.
She went to England in 1912 to take a medical degree, but switched to the London School of Economics when
she realised the animal dissection involved in obtaining a medical degree was in violation of her Jain beliefs.
Whilst in England, she was influenced by the Fabian Society, and got involved in the Suffragette
movement.
She decided to get involved in the labour movement after witnessing exhausted female mill workers returning
home after a 36-hour shift.
She was the aunt of Indian scientist Vikram Sarabhai who is regarded as the father of the Indian space
program.
Fabian Society:
It is a British socialist organisation whose purpose is to advance the principles of democratic socialism via
gradualist and reformist effort in democracies, rather than by revolutionary overthrow.
Kheda Satyagraha:
Kharif Crop had failed but the government was insisting on the payment of the revenue.
The Rule was if <25% production then complete remission. At Bombay Barristers VJ Patel and JK Parekh
had already enquired and stated that it was the case of remission.
Gandhiji asked them to hold the payment of taxes.
Gandhiji along with Vallabhbhai Patel, Indulal Yagnik and many others toured the villages to encourage
the peasants. Sardar Vallabhai Patel joined Gandhiji here.
Leaders like Narhari Parikh, Mohanlal Pandya, Ravi Shankar Vyas helped Gandhi in the movement. The
movement was highly disciplined and unity was maintained. Later the government took revenue only from
those who could pay.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
MODERN HISTORY
Lecture – 35
Non-Cooperation and
Khilafat Movement
2
Rowlatt Satyagraha:
On April 6, 1919, hartals were organised in almost all the important cities of the country. (In Delhi, a hartal
was observed on 30 March and then people were killed in police firing)
Gandhiji started propagating his ideas and aimed even at peasants, poor and villages. A new energy was
imparted to the struggle. Political awakening started in the country.
Gandhi intensified the agitation on 7th April. He selected four books including Hind Swaraj, Sarvodaya or
Universal Dawn (a paraphrase of John Ruskin’s Unto This Last), The Story of a Satyagrahi (a
paraphrase of the Defense and Death of Socrates by Plato), and The Life and Address of
Mustafa Kemal Pasha for Sale as an action of defiance against the government. Subsequently Gandhi was
arrested.
Finally, a call for hartal was given on 8th April.
4
On 18th April, Gandhi decided to call off the Satyagraha because of the widespread violence particularly in
his home state in Ahmedabad city. He confessed publicly that he committed a ‘Himalayan blunder’ by offering
civil disobedience to people who were insufficiently prepared for the discipline of Satyagraha.
Saifuddin Kitchlew:
He was a lawyer and Muslim Nationalist leader.
Saifuddin Kitchlew was a member of Indian National Congress, head and later
the General Secretary of the AICC (All India Congress Committee) in 1924.
He was most remembered for the protests in Punjab after the implementation of
Rowlatt Act in March 1919, after which on 10 April, he and another leader
Satyapal, were secretly sent to Dharamsala.
He was the founding member of Jamia Millia Islamia. He was awarded the
Stalin Peace Prize (now known as Lenin Peace Prize) in 1952.
He was also the founding leader of the Naujawan Bharat Sabha (Indian Youth Congress), which rallied
hundreds of thousands of students and young Indians to nationalist causes.
He started an Urdu daily Tanzim and was instrumental in the establishment of Swaraj Ashram in 1921
at Amritsar to train young men for national work and to promote Hindu-Muslim unity.
Kitchlew supported a united Indian nationalism against British colonial rule and opposed the partition of
India, holding that a divided India would weaken Muslims, both economically and
politically.
Satyapal:
He was a physician and political leader in Punjab.
During the First World War, he received a temporary King's Commission as a
lieutenant in the Indian Medical Service, serving with distinction.
Following the Rowlatt Act, he became active in the movement of non-cooperation
and non-violent resistance to British rule.
5
Analysis
What emerged from this
agitation was that organizational
preparation was extremely
limited and patchy.
The congress as an organization was hardly in the picture at all.
The Satyagraha was more intense in cities than in rural areas.
But the most important outcome of this agitation was the emergence of Gandhi as an all-India leader. It forced
him to plunge into national politics in a forceful manner.
Hunter Commission:
To inquire into the Jallianwala massacre, the British Government appointed a Disorders Inquiry committee,
popularly known as hunter commission after the name of its chairman Lord William Hunter.
Purpose: To inquire into the recent disturbances in Bombay, Delhi and Punjab.
The commission had three Indian members: Sir Chimanlal Harilal Setalvad, Pt Jagat Narayan, Sardar
Sahibzada Sultan Ahmed Khan.
Before the committee, General Dyer confessed that his intention was to strike terror throughout the Punjab and
reduce the morale of rebels.
The report of the committee unanimously condemned Dyer’s action.
However, the commission did not take any disciplinary action against Dyer because his actions were endorsed
by various superiors and later upheld by the Army Council.
Also, before the Hunter Commission began its proceedings the Government passed the Indemnity Act for the
protection of its officers. The Act was termed as White Washing Bill by Motilal Nehru and others.
In Britain Churchill condemned Dyer’s action and called it monstrous.
In the end Dyer was found guilty for a ‘mistaken notion of duty’ and dismissed from his post. He was called
back to England but no legal action was taken against him.
The Morning Post raised a sum of 26,000 pounds for Dyer. Rudyard Kipling was a famous contributor to the
fund.
Strangely enough, the clergy of Golden temple, led by Arur Singh, honoured Dyer by declaring him as Sikh.
A large number of citizens of Amritsar were subjected to the humiliation of crawling on their bellies along the
streets. It was followed by indiscriminate arrests, confiscation of properties and whipping of thousands of
innocent people.
This national tragedy moved the whole nation.
The great poet Rabindranath Tagore gave up his Knighthood and Gandhi gave up his title of Kaiser-i-
hind (Given for his work during the World War)
Sir Shankaran Nayer resigned from the Governor General Executive council
Mahatma Gandhi made up his mind to launch a Non-cooperation movement against the government.
The Hunter commission report on the Punjab disturbances was described by Gandhi as a ‘white wash’.
Congress appointed its own committee including Motilal Nehru, Gandhi, C.R Das, Abbas Tyabji, and M.R
Jaykar. It strongly condemned the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre.
The Congress supported the Khilafat Movement.
The Jallianwala Massacre made Gandhi realise that India’s Independence from Britain was morally righteous.
According to A.P.J Taylor, Jallianwala Bagh was a decisive moment when Indians were alienated from
British rule.
Later Udham Singh, assassinated Michael O’Dwyer (the Lt Gov who presided over the British suppression
of 1919 in Punjab).
The two brothers, Muhammad Ali and Shaukat Ali, and Maulana Abul Kalam Azad organized a mass
movement of the Muslims known as the Khilafat movement.
In 1918 Muslim League at Delhi session was held, where M.A. Ansari demanded the restoration of Arab lands
to the Caliph.
Non-Cooperation Movement:
Common demands-
Congress and Khilafat Committee zeroed
down to three common demands:
Swaraj
Redressal of khilafat issue
Redressal of Punjab wrongs
In this session Gandhi gave hope that with proper implementation of non-cooperation programmes, then
“Swaraj in one year” is possible to achieve.
Many revolutionary groups also supported the non-cooperation movement and decided to suspend
their activities.
Some prominent leaders left congress on the basis of methods of congress they believe in traditional
methods of Agitation leaders including Jinnah, GS Khaparde, Bipin Chandra Pal and Annie Besant.
Surendranath Banerjee expressed no support and formed the Indian National Liberation Federation.
Under destructive programme came: Surrender of titles and honorary offices, and resignation from
nominated seats in local bodies, refusal to attend official and non-official functions, gradual withdrawal of
children from government schools and colleges, boycott of British courts by lawyers and litigants, refusal on
the part of military clerical and labour classes to offer themselves as recruits for service in Mesopotamia,
boycott of elections to the legislative councils by candidates and voters and boycott of foreign goods.
The constructive programme of the Non-cooperation movement comprised: founding of National schools
and colleges, promotion of Swadeshi, setting up of arbitration boards to take the place of courts, popularization
of charkha and Khadi and raising a volunteer corps.
The AICC meeting at Vijaywada on March 31, 1921 outlined two more programmes:
1. To collect one crore rupees for the Tilak Swarajya Fund.
2. To introduce 20 lakh charkhas into Indian households, Gandhiji had promised that if the programme
was fully implemented, Swaraj would be ushered in within the year.
Congress volunteer corps emerged as volunteer police.
The movement was launched formally on 1 August, 1920 but according to Sumit Sarkar, “Four Phases may
be distinguished in what may be termed the official movement, specifically responding to successive calls
from the working committee”.
No tax movement against union board taxes started in Midnapore (Bengal) and Guntur (A.P)
In Assam, strikes were organised in Tea Plantation, steamer services and Assam-Bengal services. J.M
Sengupta was a prominent leader of these strikes.
Many local movements emerged alongside the Non-Cooperation. These included Awadh Kisan Movement
(UP), Eka Movement (UP), Mappila Revolt (Malabar), Sikh Movement against Mahants (Punjab).
Khilafat Committee:
The Khilafat Committee gave a call to Muslims to not to serve in the British Army.
Ali Brothers were arrested for sedition.
Gandhiji gave a call to all Indians not to serve the British.
Prince of Wales was greeted with demonstrations
In December 1921, the Ahmedabad session of the Indian National Congress took place where C R Das
(President) -in prison and Hakim Ajmal Khan played the role of acting president of Indian National
Congress.
The Congress in this session was determined to continue the struggle and remain non-violent.
13
People’s Participation:
Middle Class
Middle class led the movement in the beginning but there was a slowdown in their enthusiasm.
In major cities like Calcutta, Bombay and Madras, people’s response to Gandhi’s call was very
limited.
His call for resignation from Government services and surrender of titles and honours was not taken
seriously.
However, the young leaders like Rajendra Prasad (Bihar) and Vallabhai Patel (Gujrat) provided a
solid support base to the movement and helped it sustain.
Business Class
By and large the business class supported the movement as they had been benefited from Nationalists’
emphasis on swadeshi goods.
Peasants
Their participation was massive.
In general, they turned against the landlords and the traders.
Students
They were an active participant of the movement. Thousands left colleges and schools to join national
schools and colleges.
Women
Large number of them gave up purdah to participate in picketing and protest. They offered their ornaments
to raise funds for Tilak swaraj Funds.
Hindu-Muslim
Exceptional representation of unity except certain incidents like Mopila Uprising. At some places even
two-third of those arrested were Muslims.
Government Response:
In May,1921 the Government wanted Gandhi to urge the Ali brothers to remove those portions of speech which
suggested violence. Gandhi refused as he realised that the Government was trying to create a divide. The talks
between him and Lord Reading (1921-26) broke down.
In December 1921, the Government came up with severe repression, Congress and khilafat committee actions
were declared illegal, Volunteer corps were declared illegal, public meetings were banned and press gagged.
Political leaders except Gandhiji were arrested along with their followers.
Andhra
Locals protested against forest laws by releasing cattle to forest and breaking grazing laws.
Alluri Sitaram Raju organised tribals and channelised their demand with Non-Cooperation Movement.
Karnataka
Mild response and Madras Presidency showed a not furious participation like other states.
Orissa
Refusal of payment of Awabs by tenets of Kanika Raj.
Awabs is miscellaneous cess levied on natives on subject of house tax, grazing etc.
Bengal
Gandhian methods were not effective due to elitism.
Tagore appreciated Gandhi’s effort but criticised his narrowness and charkha.
Rajasthan
Non-Cooperation Movement driven by Peasant Movements.
Bijola Movement in Mewar (excessive land revenue)
Bhil Movement by Motilal Tejawat (adivasi movement against jagirdars for unfair taxes).
Punjab
Non-Cooperation Movement linked with local Akali Movement (1920-25) for reform of administration of
gurudwara.
Adopted Non-violence approach.
It manifested tremendous communal unity among Sikh-Hindu-Muslim.
Maharashtra
Due to different views of Tilak from Gandhi, the Non-Cooperation Movement did not gain that flow as was
expected.
Violence occurred in the region like Malegaon.
Decline of Movement:
The day Civil disobedience was going to be launched violence took place at Chauri Chaura in February 1922
as a result of this Gandhi withdrew the movement.
Gandhi advised people to continue to pursue constructive work.
On 12 February 1922 at Bardoli Bardoli resolution passed under which peasants were asked to pay taxes, and
tenants to pay rent. On 10 March Gandhi was arrested in his ashram for six years.
16
On the other side Khilafat also ended under Mustafa Kamal Pasha. Declared Turkey as a secular and
modern state. Pasha abolished the Caliphate itself in 1924.
Gandhiji immediately decided to stop the movement
Bardoli Resolution (12th February 1922): The Congress working Committee was called at Bardoli and
the decision to stop the movement was taken.
It came as a shock to many Congressmen.
Gandhiji was arrested and sentenced for 6-year imprisonment which was same as that of Tilak [trialed by Mr.
Broomfield]
He made his historic speech at the court:
“I am here therefore, to invite and submit cheerfully to the highest penalty that can be inflicted upon me
for what in law is deliberate crime and what appears to me to be the highest duty of a citizen.”
The Khilafat issue
Kemalist revolution in Turkey
Leadership of Mustafa Kemal Pasha
Caliphate was abolished
Turkey turned to secularism
Though all accepted the decision of Gandhiji but a faction was divided on the idea of future course of the
struggle
Subhash Chandra Bose called this as “national calamity” in his autobiography “The Indian Struggle”.
Justice CN broomfield
“It would be impossible to ignore the fact, that you are in a different category from any person I have ever tried
or I'm likely to try. It would be impossible to ignore the fact that in the eyes of the millions of your country man
you are a great patriotic leader even those who differ from use politics look upon you as a man of high ideals
and of even saintly life… if the course of events in India should make it possible for the government to reduce
the period and release you’ no one will the better please then I.”
Overall, it has a significant place in the history of Indian national movement. The congress had become a force
to reckon with and thereafter it went from strength to strength.
The Chauri Chaura incident showed that people are not ready to adopt non-violence.
Movement deviated from original path to no-rent movement against zamindars.
If movement was not stopped Britishers would have used all his force to suppress at any cost.
During 1921 began to show signs of ebbing as people were returning to their respective work.
Struggle-truce-Struggle:
No movement could be sustained forever.
A halt is required to introspect over the weaknesses and to remove them.
Also, to regain the energy to struggle.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 36
Aftermath of the Non-
Cooperation
Movement
2
Role of Swarajist:
In Council
Throw out all proposals by which bureaucracy consolidates its power. Refusing supplies and throwing
out the budget to compel them to recognize their rights.
Support bills for healthy growth of national life and aiming for constructive programs of Congress.
Adopting definite economic policy to prevent drain of wealth.
Protecting the labour rights and lightning the relation between landlords and tenants.
Outside Council
Focus on communal harmony and communal unity.
Eradicating untouchability.
The control of nationalist over municipal affairs.
To gain support of foreign nations for the support of swaraj.
Gaining economic control of resources.
Organisation of agricultural and industrial labour.
Swarajists achievement in legislature:
Political aspirations
The constitutional advancement leading to self-government, civil liberties, release of political prisoners.
Challenging the repressive laws.
Development of indigenous industries.
In the 1924-25 election, the Swarajist formed a coalition with Madan Mohan Malviya, Jinnah and
emerged as Nationalist Party which dominated the proceedings.
Resolutions
Resolution in circulation by C. Vijayaraghavachariar demanding provincial autonomy and dominion
status.
Motilal Nehru recommended a plan of full responsible government for the Round Table conference.
Appointment of Reforms Enquiry Committee by Alexander Muddiman for defects in Act of 1919.
Amendment to the recommendations of Lee Commission by majority votes.
Backing for huge support from Bengal and Central Provinces Swaraj Party it created deadlock and compelled
the government to go with its special powers.
In 1925, Vithalbhai Patel became president of the Central legislative Assembly.
In 1928, they successfully defeated the Public Safety Bill through which the government aimed at deporting
the unwanted foreigners.
The Public Safety Bill was being brought because the government was alarmed by the spread of
communist and socialist ideas. It believed that a crucial role is being played by the British and other
foreign activists sent by the comintern.
They were successful in demonstrating the hollowness of Montford Reform.
The Swarajists suffered a major set-back after the death of C.R. Das in 1925.
For the various reasons in the election of 1926 Swarajist felt a jolt of defeat and lost ground.
6
Continued obstruction of Swarajist led to the spirit of responsive cooperation. Government also became
aware to handle their thinking and further thus led to division of two wings: Responsivist and Non-
Cooperators.
High Hat attitude: Leaders belonging to the high class whose attitude can be predicted by failing of
NCM they attached themselves with parliamentary politics without any concrete ideology. Lacking direct
mass action and distancing themselves from constructive work.
Widen of Communal Angle: Post 1927, Counter of Hindu Mahasabha and Muslim League were giving
challenges. Gandhi tried to settle their ideological conflict by Sabarmati Compromise but it failed.
Fragmentation of Nationalist party into Swaraj Party (Congress party), Independent Party (Jinnah) and
Nationalist party (MMM, LLR, Hindu Mahasabha and some congressmen).
Split in Swarajists
In 1925, following the death of CR Das. Communalism raised its ugly head. Some of the Swarajist legislators
could also not resist the pulls of parliamentary perquisites and position of status.
Very soon, a group of ‘Responsivists’ arose in the party who wanted to work the reforms and to hold office
whenever possible. The Swarajists finally walked out of the Legislature in 1930 as a result of Lahore congress
resolution on Purna Swaraj.
Non- Responsivists
o Motilal Nehru belonged to this group.
o They were accused of practicing such things as opposed to Hinduism.
Responsivists
o Madan Mohan Malviya, Lala Lajpat Rai, N.C Kelkar belonged to this group.
o Hindu Maha Sabha.
o They even offered support to Britishers so as to safeguard the interest of Hindus.
Motilal Nehru 1919 Amritsar Jallianwalla Bagh Massacre was condemned,
Boosted the Khilafat Movement.
Lala Lajpat Rai 1920 Calcutta (Special
Session)
C. Vijayaraghavachariar 1920 Nagpur Gandhian programme was adopted. A new
constitution of the Congress is formed.
Deshbandhu Chittaranjan 1921 Ahmedabad Harsat Mohani demanded for complete
Das (President) independence.
Hakim Ajmal Khan
(Acting President)
Deshbandhu Chittaranjan 1922 Gaya The Swarajya Party formed.
Das
Mohammad Ali Jouhar 1923 Kakinada
8
Abul Kalam Azad 1923 Delhi (Special Maulana Abul Kalalm Azad became the youngest
Session) president of INC
Mohandas Gandhi 1924 Belgaum The only session where Gandhi Ji was the President
of INC
Sarojini Naidu 1925 Kanpur First Indian Woman President of INC
Socialism:
● Social and economic doctrine that calls for public instead of private ownership
or control of property and natural resources. According to the socialist view,
individuals do not live or work in isolation but live in cooperation with one
another.
● Everything that people produce is in some sense a social product, and
everyone who contributes to the production of a good is entitled to a share in
it. Society as a whole, therefore, should own or at least control property for the
benefit of all its members.
● As per socialists, true freedom and true equality require social control of the resources that provide the
basis for prosperity in any society.
● Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels made this point in the Manifesto of the Communist Party (1848) when they
proclaimed that in a socialist society “the condition for the free development of each is the free development
of all”.
Caste Movements:
● These included
Justice Party movement- Madras.
Self-Respect Movement- Madras- E.V Ramaswamy Naicker (Periyar)
Satyashodhak samaj- Satara, Madras.
Mahars under Ambedkar.
Ezhavas under K. Ayyappan and K. Kesavan in Kerala.
Yadavs in Bihar for improvement of Social Status.
Unionist Party under Fazl-i- Hussain - Punjab
9
Composition
Sec. of State (Lord Birkenhead) announced the appointment of a 7 members commission, appointed by
Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin.
7 Members of Simon Commission (7 Members)
1. Sir John Simon (Liberal)
2. Clement Attlee (Labour)
3. Harry Levy-Lawson (Conservative)
4. Edward Cadogan (Conservative)
5. Vernon Hartshorn (Labour)
6. George Lane-Fox (Conservative)
7. Donald Howard (Conservative)
Focus Area of the Commission
To improve the working system of the Government.
To improve the growth of education.
Development of representative institution
Analysis of need, demand of responsible government, restrict or modification of responsible government.
Examining the need for a second chamber of the local legislatures.
Concerns
Not a Single Indian member to represent in the Commission. It was an all-British members Commission
and rejection to all nationalists.
Ignoring Indians in matters related to India.
Whole squad of Englishmen in commission will not put the complete picture of Indians.
The British action was seen as a violation of the principle of self-determination and a deliberate insult to
the self-respect of the Indians.
Reaction
Boycott of commission by Congress, a part of Muslim League, liberal foundation (Tej Bahadur Sapru), The
indian industrial and commercial congress, Hindu Mahasabha.
Simon Boycott Movement:
Madras Congress Session in 1927 (president Dr. Ansari), boycott commission “every stage in every
form”.
In the same session Nehru managed to get a resolution passed declaring Complete Independence as the goal
of the congress.
When the Commission landed, they faced backlash from slogans like “Simon Go Back”. In almost every part
of the country. In Madras T. Prakasham (Andhra Kesari) led a huge protest.
Boycott was welcomed by
Anglo Indians, Hindu Mahasabha, Depressed classes.
A faction of Muslim League under Jinnah, Unionists in Punjab and Justice Party in South.
12
Birkenhead challenged Indian nationalist to come up with a constitution acceptable to all sections of
society.
Conference adopted on the basis of full Dominion responsible government.
To draft a constitution appointment of a sub-committee under Motilal Nehru. Committee included
Motilal Nehru as chairman, Subhash Chandra Bose, Tej Bahadur Sapru, M.S Aney, Mangal Singh,
Ali Imam, Shuab Qureshi and G.R Pradhan.
Presented the report at Lucknow in August 1928.
Nehru Report (1928):
Main Recommendations:
India must be given Dominion Status. However, a section advocated for Complete Independence).
Principle of Separate communal electorates were rejected. Instead, it demanded joint electorate with
reservation of seats for Muslims at centre and in provinces where they were in minority (and not where
they were in majority like Punjab and Bengal)
19 Fundamental Rights which included Universal adult suffrage, Equal right for women, and Right
to form Unions.
Linguistic Provinces.
Responsible government at the centre and provinces.
Indian Parliament at centre to have:
o House of Representative (500 members) elected on Universal Adult Franchise. Term of 5 years.
o Senate (200 members) to have 7 years tenure.
o Central Government to be headed by the Governor General, appointed by British Govt but paid out of
Indian Revenue.
o Provinces to have 5-year tenure, headed by the Governor acting on the advice of the provincial
executive council.
o Full protection to Cultural and religious interests of Muslims.
o Hierarchy of Courts.
o Dissociation of the state from religion in any form.
Characteristics of Nehru Report
Purely national approach and it considered the country as whole not as heterogeneous division.
Idealism spirit and accommodative stance.
Finest and bold attempt by an Indian to tackle communalism.
The Calcutta Session of the congress (1928) approved the Nehru Report and served an ultimatum on the
government to accept the Nehru report on or before December 31, 1929, failing which the party would launch
another mass movement. In the same year, the All Parties Conference at Calcutta failed to pass the
Nehru report.
Objections raised by Muslim League to Nehru Report:
Congress-League Agreement of 1916 was rejected which had provision of ‘separate electorate’.
14
Non-Uniform distribution of seats, Muslim dominant region (N-W, N-E region) would be controlled by
them but in the central region they will always remain in minority.
Jinnah termed the Nehru report as “Parting of the way” with Congress. Above objections were not
entertained. So, Jinnah joined the group of Aga Khan and Md. Shafi.
These concerns had pushed Jinnah towards communalism and made many Muslim leaders hostile towards the
Civil Disobedience Movement.
All Party Conference at Calcutta:
Jinnah opposed a few points. He proposed three amendments (Calcutta Amendment). Those were:
1. 1/3rd representation of Muslims in the central Assembly.
2. Reservation to Muslims in Bengal and Punjab in proportion to their population till adult suffrage was
established.
3. Residual power to provinces.
This was challenged by M R Jayakar of Hindu Mahasabha.
Jinnah’s proposal was not entertained.
Nehru Report failed to satisfy Nationalists: Apart from League, Mahasabha and Sikh community, Nehru
Report failed to satisfy the younger Nationalists in congress like Jawaharlal Nehru and S.C Bose. They
regarded the Dominion status as a step backward.
Dissatisfied with congress, Nehru and Bose together set up the Independence for India League, it was a
pressure group within the Congress.
President - S Srinivas Iyengar
Secretaries - Nehru and Bose
Their Demands were:
o Counter Dominion status demanded.
o Demand for Complete Independence.
o Work for establishing the All Indian Republic on socialist lines.
Issue of Princely States:
In 1927, States of Peoples Conference objective of self-governing institutions princely states felt threatened to
their supremacy and went to Britishers.
Britishers appointed Butler Committee (Harcourt Butler) to emphasise on preserving states through
British paramountcy.
Butler Committee (Indian states committee)
Members: Harcourt Butler chairman, W S Holdsworth and S C Peel.
Enquire into relation of states with Britain
Recommendations:
o Paramountcy must remain supreme.
o States would not be transferred to an Indian government responsible to the Indian legislature without
their consent.
o It must fulfill its obligation, adopting and defining itself according to the shifting necessities of time
and progressive development of the states.
o Viceroy would act as agent of Britain.
15
PW Web/App: https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
MODERN HISTORY
Lecture – 37
Civil Disobedience
Movement
2
❖ Jawaharlal Nehru was now made the president of the congress. The Lahore session occupies a unique
place in the history of Indian freedom struggle. It was during this session that a resolution for complete
Independence (Poorna Swarajya) was passed.
❖ In 1929 on 31 December, Jawaharlal Nehru hoisted the newly adopted flag of tri-colour on the bank of
river Ravi.
❖ 26 January 1930 was fixed as the first Independence Day, which was to be
celebrated every year with the people taking the Independence Pledge that it
was “a crime against man and god to submit any longer” to British rule.
❖ Independence Pledge written by Mahatma Gandhi.
❖ This program met with massive people appeal with great success.
❖ Public meetings were held throughout the country in villages and towns and Independence Day pledge was
read out in local language and the National Flag was hoisted.
Presidential Address at the AICC Session, Lahore, December 29, 1929
“The Congress stands today for full democracy in India and fights for a democratic
state, not for socialism. It is anti-imperialist and strives for great changes in our
political and economic structure. I hope that the logic of events will lead it to
socialism for that seems to me the only remedy for India's ills. But the urgent and
vital problem for us today is political independence and the establishment of a
democratic state. And because of this, the Congress must line up with all the
progressive forces of the world and must stand for world peace....
We have great tasks ahead, great problems to solve both in India and in the
international sphere. Who can face and solve these problems in India but this great
organisation of ours, which has, through fifty years' efforts and sacrifice,
established its unchallengeable right to speak for the millions of India? Has it not
become the mirror of their hopes and desires, their urge to freedom, and the strong arm that will wrest this
freedom from unwilling and resisting hands? It started in a small way with a gallant band of pioneers, but even
then it represented a historic force and it drew to itself the goodwill of the Indian people. From year to year it
grew, faced inner conflicts whenever it wanted to advance and was held back by some of its members. But the
urge to go ahead was too great, the push from below increased, and though a few left us, unable to adjust
themselves to changing conditions, vast numbers of others joined the Congress. It became a great propaganda
machine dominating the public platform of India. But it was an amorphous mass and its organisational side was
weak, and effective action on a large scale was beyond its powers.
The coming of Gandhiji brought the peasant masses to the Congress, and the new constitution that was
adopted at his instance in Nagpur in 1920 tightened up the organisation, limited the number of delegates
according to population, and gave it strength and capacity for joint and effective action. That action followed
soon after on a countrywide scale and was repeated in later years. But the very success and prestige of the
Congress often drew undesirable elements to its fold and accentuated the defects of the Constitution. The
organisation was becoming unwieldy and slow of movement and capable of being exploited in local areas by
particular groups. Two years ago radical changes were made in the Constitution again at Gandhiji's instance.
4
One of these was the fixation of the number of delegates according to membership, a change which has given a
greater reality to our elections and strengthened us organisationally. But still our organisational side lags far
behind the great prestige of the Congress, and there is a tendency for our committees to function in the air, cut
off from the rank and file.
It was partly to remedy this that the mass contacts resolution was passed by the Lucknow Congress, but
unhappily the committee that was in charge of this matter has not reported yet. The problem is a wider one than
was comprised in that resolution for it includes an overhauling of the Congress Constitution with the object of
making it a closer knit body, capable of disciplined and effective action. That action to be effective must be mass
action, and the essence of the strength of the Congress has been this mass basis and mass response to its calls.
But though that mass basis is there, it is not reflected in the organisational side, and hence an inherent weakness
in our activities.
We have seen the gradual transformation of the Congress from a small super-class body to one representing
the great body of the lower middle classes and later the masses of this country. As this drift to the masses
continued the political role of the organisation changed and is changing, for this political role is largely
determined by the economic roots of the organisation.
We are already and inevitably committed to this mass basis for without it there is no power or strength in
us. We have now to bring that into line with the organisation, so as to give our primary members great powers
of initiative and control, and opportunities for day-to-day activities. We have, in other words, to democratise the
Congress still further.”
❖ Gandhiji presented his demands to Lord Irwin and waited for 41 days.
❖ Gandhiji thus related the abstract concept of independence to certain specific grievances; but of all grievances,
salt tax seemed to be the most crucial one for many reasons. It affected all sections of the population and
had no divisive implications. It would not provoke government repression and finally, it could be made into a
highly emotive issue with great publicity value.
5
❖ As Irwin was in no mood to compromise, the civil Disobedience movement was started by Gandhi on 12
March 1930 with his famous Dandi March. Together with 78 Chosen followers, Gandhi Walked nearly 375
km from Sabarmati Ashram to Dandi, a village on the Gujarat Sea-Coast After a 24-day long march, he
symbolically broke the salt laws at Dandi on April 5. This attracted enormous publicity both in India and
overseas.
Dialogues
❖ The Salt March was notable for at least three reasons
➢ First, it was this event that first brought Mahatma Gandhi to world attention.
➢ Second, it was the first nationalist activity in which women participated in large numbers. The socialist
activist Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay had persuaded Gandhiji not to restrict the protests to men alone.
➢ Third, the Salt March made the British realize that their Raj would not last forever, and that they would
have to devolve some power to the Indians.
➢ In Chotanagpur, Bonga Manjhi and Somra Manjhi, influenced by Gandhism, led a movement in
Hazaribagh which combined socio-religious reform along Sanskritising lines in which followers were
asked to give up meat and liquor and wear khadi.
❖ Jawaharlal Nehru was arrested in April 1930 for breaking salt law.
❖ Gandhi was arrested in May 1930 when he announced that he would lead a raid on Dharasana Salt Works on
the west coast.
❖ After Gandhi’s arrest Congress Working Committee sanctioned the following:
➢ Non-Payment of revenue in Ryotwari areas.
➢ No Chowkidari tax campaign in zamindari areas.
➢ Violation of forest laws in central provinces.
❖ Soon this movement spread like wildfire throughout the length
and breadth of the country.
❖ Peshawar: Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan also called Badshah
Khan and frontier Gandhi, organised a volunteer brigade
Khudai Khidmatgars popularly known as red Shirts. He
started the first pashto political monthly Pakhtoon.
➢ On April 23, 1930, the arrest of congress leaders led to a huge mass demonstration in Peshawar.
➢ Martial law was imposed to restore normalcy.
➢ Here a section of Garhwal Rifles soldiers refused to fire on an unarmed crowd.
➢ The upsurge in NWFP with 92% Muslim population left the Britishers nervous as Muslims were
considered loyalists by the British.
❖ Dharsana: On May 21, 1930, Dharasana salt works were raided by Sarojini Naidu, Imam Sahib and Manilal
(Gandhi’s son).
❖ Bihar: No Chowkidari tax campaign was organised. A call was given for resignation of chowkidar and
influential members of chowkidari panchayat.
❖ Bengal: Anti Chowkidari tax and anti-union board tax campaign was organised.
❖ Gujarat: Campaign for non-payment of land revenue was organised.
❖ Maharashtra, Karnataka and Central Provinces: Forest laws were violated.
❖ Assam: Campaign against Cunningham Circular was organised. The circular forced parents, guardians and
students to furnish assurances of good behaviour.
❖ United Provinces: A no-revenue campaign was organised. Also, a call was given to zamindars too to refuse
payment of revenue to the Government.
❖ Manipur and Nagaland: Rani Gaidinliu (13yrs old), a naga spiritual leader, revolted against British rule. She
was captured in 1932 and given life imprisonment. The interim Government of 1946 finally ordered her release
from jail.
Government Suppression:
❖ The British government, as usual, retaliated with repression.
❖ Over 90,000 Satyagrahis, including Gandhiji and other congress leaders, were imprisoned.
❖ The congress was declared illegal. The press was gagged.
9
❖ The private properties and lands of thousands of people were confiscated for non-payment of taxes.
❖ South India in particular experienced repression in its most severe form.
❖ The police often beat up men just for wearing Khadi or Gandhi Caps.
❖ There was a nationwide suppression, lathi charge and firing.
❖ However, accepted the idea of arbitration by Tez Bahadur Sapru and M R Jayakar.
Dharasana Satyagraha:
❖ Dharsana Satyagraha took place on 21st May 1930.
❖ After the arrest of Nehru and Gandhi Sarojini Naidu, Imam Saheb and Manilal with 2000 satyagrahis broke
salt law. As a result, attacked by police and beaten harshly.
❖ It had extended its reach to non-divisive issues;
➢ Boycotting foreign goods and liquor.
➢ Non-payment of revenue in Ryotwari Areas
➢ No revenue no rent campaign- in UP (Agra and Rae Bareilly) No revenue by zamindars and no rent
by tenants.
➢ Campaign against Cunningham Circular- which prohibited students to take part in any political
activity.
➢ Anti-Chowkidari Tax: It began in Zamindari areas of Bihar. Rajendra Prasad and Abdul Bari emerged
as the main leaders.
➢ Forest Satyagraha: In Maharashtra, Karnataka and Central province.
❖ Impact
➢ Decline in foreign goods, Government revenue crashed, election to assembly boycotted.
❖ Muslims: It was nowhere near the non-cooperation movement. Muslim leaders appealed to the Muslim masses
to stay away from the movement. However, areas such as NWFP saw an overwhelming participation.
❖ Traders: They actively participated. In the areas of Tamil Nadu and Punjab they were highly active in
implementing boycotts.
❖ Tribals: Participation was high in Central provinces, Maharashtra and Karnataka.
❖ Workers: Participation was high in industrial areas of Madras, Calcutta, Bombay and Sholapur.
❖ Peasants: Highly active in U.P Bihar and Gujrat.
❖ Business Group: The business group was led by GD Birla, taking a collective oath to not trade in foreign
goods and strengthen indigenous industries.
❖ Forms of Mobilisation: It was carried out through Prabhat Pheris, Vanar Senas, Manjari Senas, Secret Patrikas
and Magic lantern Shows.
❖ Second Round Table Conference (1931): In this conference, Gandhiji participated as the sole representative
of the congress. The session soon got deadlocked on the communal question and demand of separate
electorates. No agreed solution could be formed and Gandhiji returned India empty-handed.
❖ Third Round Table Conference (1932): The Congress boycotted it. Only 46 delegates participated in it and
all of them were the ‘Yes men’ of the British government. Some important decisions on the future constitution
of India were taken in the conference which were published in a white paper. On the basis of this white paper,
the Government of India Act of 1935 was passed.
Issues discussed:
❖ Dr B R Ambedkar demanded separate electorates for the ‘untouchables’.
❖ Federal structure
❖ Provincial constitution
❖ Provinces of Sindh and NWFP
❖ Minorities
❖ Defence services
❖ Franchise
❖ Executive responsibility to the legislature.
12
Outcome:
❖ In the absence of congress leaders many principles on reforms were
agreed upon, not much was implemented and the Congress Party carried
on its civil disobedience.
❖ The Conference was regarded as a failure.
❖ The British government understood the importance and the need for the
Congress Party to make any decision on India’s political future.
❖ The All India Federation of British was formed.
❖ Pitch to responsible government at the centre with reservation and safeguard.
❖ From the period of first Round Table Conference and launch of the second phase of Civil Disobedience it was
categorised as the “Truce Period”.
❖ It was because of a tussle between Congress and Government.
❖ This period will witness the Gandhi-Irwin Pact, Karachi Session and second Round Table Conference.
Government Repression:
❖ In January 1932, the government struck again and arrested many congress leaders. The government had
issued a number of ordinances to crush national activities.
❖ The Government came up with a series of repressive ordinance which created a martial law like situation
arresting a large number of nationalists (more than 1 Lakh)
❖ Congress organisations at all levels were banned.
❖ Gandhi’s ashrams were occupied.
❖ Press was gagged and Nationalist literatures were banned.
❖ The new viceroy Willington had refused to meet Gandhi.
❖ Thus, it became essential to revive the civil disobedience movement against the highly repressive policy of the
government.
❖ A certain number of seats were allotted to Muslims, Europeans and Sikhs, and members of these
communities were to vote in separate constituencies.
❖ There was also provision for separate electorates for Depressed classes as a separate community and separating
from the rest of the Hindus.
❖ It recommended:
➢ Doubling the seat in provincial legislature
➢ Separate electorate for minorities.
➢ Provision of reservation of 3% to women except in NWFP.
➢ Allocate seats to labour, landlords and industrialists.
❖ Congress’s Response: It rejected separate electorates and insisted on universal franchise. Earlier congress had
accepted a separate electorate in 1916 at that time congress did support this. It decided neither to accept nor
to reject the communal award.
❖ Gandhi’s Response: He saw the communal award as an attack on India’s unity and nationalism. He considered
it harmful to both Hinduism and the Depressed Classes since it provided no answer to the socially degraded
position of the depressed classes.
❖ Gandhi argued that the question of abolishing untouchability would get undermined once we start treating the
depressed classes as a separate political entity.
❖ Gandhi demanded that depressed classes should be elected through the joint and universal adult franchise.
He however was in favour of an increased number of reserved seats for the depressed classes.
Gandhiji in order to express the resentment against this award started fast unto death in Yerwada Jail (Pune)
on Sept. 20, 1932.
❖ After his release from the jail, he shifted to Satyagraha Ashram in Wardha and vowed in 1930 not to return
to Sabarmati Ashram unless he gets swaraj.
❖ From Nov 1933 to July 1934, he toured the country propagating his message on Untouchability.
❖ He also set up Harijan Sewak Sangh. He urged political workers to go to the villages and work for the
upliftment of Harijans.
❖ He undertook two fasts during the period to show the seriousness of his efforts. He advocated for throwing
open the temples for the untouchables.
❖ He said “Hinduism dies if untouchability lives, untouchability has to die if hinduism is to live”.
❖ Throughout his campaign he had to face reactions from the orthodox section of the society. One of the most
significant impacts of Gandhi’s Harijan campaign was the increased participation of Harijans in the
national movement.
❖ Sometimes attacked by conservative groups, the government supported them by introducing the Temple Entry
Bill in August 1934.
➢ Aligning with Lancashire out of fear of Japanese competition, British textile will be preferred.
➢ Britishers promise to buy more raw cotton from us.
➢ Sir William Clare-Lees and the Bombay Mill Owners Association (Sir Hormasji Pherozeshah Mody)
to check the rising imports of Japanese textile goods into India.
❖ Due to these factors Gandhi withdrew it in April 1934.
Sources of Act:
❖ Report of Simon Commission
❖ Report of All parties Conference also known as
Nehru Report
❖ Outcome of the discussion of all the three Round
Table Conferences
❖ The white paper published in Round Table
Conference
❖ Joint Selection Committee Report
❖ Lothian report
(b) The aggregate population, which amounted to at least one-half of the total population of all the Indian
States, had acceded to the Federation.
❖ The terms on which a State joined the Federation were to be laid down in the Instrument of Accession.
❖ Federal Assembly: The British Indian members were to be elected, not directly by the people as was to be the
case in regard to the Council of State but indirectly by the members of the Provincial Legislative
Assemblies on the system of proportional representation with the single transferable vote.
❖ States: The members were to be nominated by the Rulers.
❖ Eligibility for women voters was revised
➢ Under the act to include women aged 21 +
➢ Met the same property qualifications as men,
➢ Literate in any language in use in India,
➢ Who were wives or widows of a person who had paid income tax in the prior financial year or had served
in the Royal Military.
Comment
❖ In the Upper House the election was to be direct while in the Lower and theoretically more popular House
it was to be indirect, a feature deviating from the general practice.
22
❖ The princes were to nominate one-third of the representatives in the Lower House and two-fifths in the
Upper House.
❖ For the purpose of choosing persons to fill the women's seats in the Federal Assembly there shall be for British
India electoral college consisting of such women as are members of Legislative Assembly of any Governors'
Province, and the person to fill a woman's seat allotted to any particular Province shall be chosen by the
members of the college.
23
Provincial Autonomy:
Provincial Executive:
❖ As in the case of the Federation, the Executive authority of a province was vested in a Governor appointed to
represent the Crown in the province. His position was largely modelled on that of the Governor-General.
❖ The administration of the provincial affairs was to be ordinarily carried on by a Council of Ministers appointed
by the Governor from among the elected members of the provincial legislature and responsible to that body.
❖ The ministers held office during the Governor's pleasure and as such they carried on the administration with a
double sense of responsibility.
25
❖ The Governor, like the Governor- General, did not only act as the constitutional head of the province merely
acting on the advice of the Council of Ministers.
➢ He had "special responsibilities" regarding certain specified subjects (i.e., the prevention of menace to
the peace or tranquillity of the province or any part thereof), while in the case of particular provinces like
the C.P. and Sind, circumstances necessitated a special rider to his such responsibilities.
➢ In the discharge of his 'special responsibilities', he was authorised to act in several matters at his discretion
without consulting his ministers, in others he exercised his individual judgement, after considering the
advice given to him by his ministers.
❖ If a question arose as to the capacity in which the Governor had to act to a particular case, whether as the
constitutional head or in his discretion or in his individual judgement, his decision on the question in his
discretion was to be final.
❖ In other words, the field of ministerial responsibility with respect to any particular matter was as wide or as
narrow as the Governor might choose to make it. There is no doubt that the Governor under the Act had
enormous powers (which included many legislative powers as well as over non-votable items, comprising
about 40% of the budget).
❖ The Governor could and in several cases actually did dismiss the ministers. He could also by a proclamation
take the entire or partial government of the province into his own hands (in the first instance for six months) if
he was satisfied that the government of the province could not be carried on in accordance with the normal
provisions of the Act.
Provincial Legislatures:
❖ The composition of the Provincial legislature naturally varied from province to province. In all Provincial
Legislative Assemblies all members were directly elected by the people.
❖ But in six provinces (Madras, Bombay, Bengal, the U.P., Bihar and Assam) there was a bicameral
Legislature consisting of a Legislative Council and a Legislative Assembly and in each of these Legislative
Councils a few seats were filled by the Governor through nomination.
26
❖ The separatist system of representation by religious communities and other groups—instead of representation
by the general mass of the people usual in modern democracies—was a prominent feature of the Act of 1935.
❖ The electoral provisions of the Act were governed by the communal award of the British Government, as
modified by the Poona Pact in respect of the Scheduled Castes.
❖ Under it, seats in the legislatures were divided among various communities and groups.
❖ Besides, there were separate constituencies for General, Muslim, European, Anglo Indian, Indian Christian
and Sikh communities.
❖ All qualified electors who were not voters in a Muslim, European, Anglo-Indian, Indian Christian or
Sikh constituency were entitled to vote in a General constituency.
❖ Some of the General seat* were reserved for the Scheduled Castes. All the members of the Scheduled
Castes who were voters in a General constituency were to take part in a primary election for the purpose
of electing four candidates for each reserved seat.
❖ The four persons, so elected, were to be candidates for election by the General electorate.
❖ Except in Assam, seats allowed also were divided among various communities.
❖ Moreover, there were separate constituencies for Labour, Landholders, Commerce and Industry, etc.
❖ This communal award of the British Government accentuated the communal dissensions in the country,
which paved the way for the eventual partition of India.
❖ The number of seats in the various Legislative Assemblies was:
➢ 50 in the North-West Frontier Province,
➢ 60 each in Orissa and Sind,
➢ 108 in Assam,
27
population of British India. Even the workers and women got separate representation although they had
not asked for it.
❖ Reorganisation of provinces
➢ Sindh was separated from Bombay
➢ Split of Bihar and Orissa to become separate individual provinces
➢ New provinces - Sindh and Orissa.
❖ Separation of Burma
➢ Recommended by Simon Commission and it was accepted by the Government of India Act 1935.
➢ In 1935, the Burma Act was passed which proposed for a new Burma office which had the power to
establish Burma as a separate colony.
➢ Burma was separated in 1937.
❖ The Government of India Bill received the Royal assent in August 1935. The British Government decided that
Provincial autonomy would be introduced on April 1, 1937, leaving the Federation in abeyance—in fact the
Federation as visualized in the Act of 1935 never came into being. The electoral provisions began to operate
on July 3, 1936 and the provisions for Provincial autonomy on April 1, 1937.
➢ The operative part of the Act of 1935 remained in force till August 15, 1947, when it was amended by the
Independence of India Act, 1947.
▪ The ultimate authority on almost every subject remained in the hands of the British and the Indians
were unable to run the administration to the benefit of their countrymen.
▪ Whenever the British interests came to be in danger, the Governor-General and the Governors
suppressed the nationalist and revolutionary movements by the use of their special powers. So the
autonomy was only theoretical and a mere illusion. In the words of Dr. Rajendra Prasad—
▪ “The wide powers vested in the Governor, Governor-General and also in the Crown and Parliament,
negative the very essence of the Provincial Autonomy—the great prize awarded to the Indians.”
➢ Communal Electorates:
▪ In spite of the strong protests of the Indian against the communal electorates, this act not only retained
this system but extended it also.
▪ It suited the British who were following a policy of ‘Divide and Rule.’ The Harijans labourers,
women, Anglo-Indians and Christians, came to have separate electorates. This act was injurious to
the interests of the Indians. That is why Y.C. Chintamani has said.
▪ “I venture to describe the Government of India Act as the anti-India Act.”
➢ It denied the Right of Self-determination:
▪ The Act denied the Indians the right of self-determination. How could then they frame an
independent constitution for themselves. This safeguarded the dominance of the British Parliament
and aimed at suppressing the demands of freedom.
▪ The inclusion of safeguards and reservations aimed at providing a cover under which the Governors
and the Governors-General could exercise unlimited powers as agents of the British Parliament.
▪ The above discussion goes as far as to clarify that the Government of India Act of 1935 was not
born for the Indians. The English had in fact no mind to grant independence to India. Even impartial
politicians like Atlee had said that this act had nothing like the Dominion Status even mentioned in
itself much less its grant.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture - 38
Revolutionary
2
Revolutionary
On finding all the avenues of peaceful protest closed and in the light of severe govt repression, the
youth found it meaningful to resort to revolutionary activities and expel the Britishers by force.
The government's brutal suppression of swadeshi aided the growth of revolutionaries.
Revolutionaries’ way of action: At that time the revolutionaries didn’t consider it meaningful to
create a violent mass revolution throughout the country.
3
The Special Plague Committee was formed under the Chairmanship of Rand, he was accused
of forceful steps and exploitation of people.
During this trial Bal Gangadhar Tilak was continuously posting critical articles for their arrest
in his paper “Kesari and Maratha”.
Later, both brothers along with Vasudev Deported without trial and hanged. Tilak was charged
with the incitement of murder and sedition and sentenced to 18 month imprisonment.
Chitpavan Brahmins
They were concentrated at Poona.
Their forefathers served as Peshwas of the rulers of Maharashtra.
Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Savarkar were Chitpavan
Brahmins.
Bal Gangadhar Tilak popularised Ganpati and Shivaji
festival in 1893.
Savarkar Brothers:
Ganesh and Vinayak Savarkar were famously known as Savarkar
Brothers.
They found 2 secret societies:
In 1899, Mitra Mela, a revolutionary organisation, was
founded by Vinayak Savarkar.
In 1904, as Mitra mela gradually expanded it was renamed
Abhinava Bharat on the theme of “Mazzini’s Young Italy”.
Savarkar wrote “Mazzini Charitra”.
Activities of Savarkar
VD Savarkar availed fellowship of Shyamji Krishna Verma’s
fellowship and took accommodation in India House to study
in London.
He founded Free India Society in England, its work based on
the warfare on the lines of revolt of 1857.
V. D. Savarkar was one first writer to recognise the 1857 revolt
as the first war of independence in his book “Indian War of
Independence” which was banned and Bhikaji Cama
circulated to France, Germany and Netherland.
Assasination of Col. William Curzon: A protege of Savarkar, Madan Lal Dhingra shot
William Curzon Wyllie. Later, Madan Lal Dhingra was caught and hanged.
5
Nasik Conspiracy:
AMT Jackson, Magistrate of Nasik was shot dead by Anant Kanhere.
Evidence found the connection to Savarkar for this killing and revealed the existence of Abhinav
Bharat.
Later in charge of murder VD Savarkar was sentenced to life imprisonment and deported to
Andmans in 1910.
Jackson was Indologist due to which, also known as Pandit Jackson because of his study on
India and its culture.
Vinayak Savarkar (1883 – 1966):
He belonged to a Chitpavan Brahmin family.
He was a lawyer and a freedom fighter.
He was an alumni of Fergusson college in Pune.
Later, he went to the United Kingdom to study Law.
He was associated with India House and Free India Society.
He denounced religious and orthodox beliefs.
He assumed the title “Veer” for defending his village from
Muslim mobs.
He was influenced by the Swadeshi Movement and “Lal-Bal-
Pal”.
He wrote the magnum opus, “The Indian War of Independence”. Translated the biography of
Mazzini in Marathi.
He went to Bhikaji Cama House in Paris.
In 1910 he asked for asylum from France but France refused to do so and he was extradited and
brought to Andaman Cellular Jail.
He was prisoned in the Andaman Cellular Jail. In 1922 he was brought to Ratnagiri Jail
(Maharashtra) and finally he was released in 1930.
In 1924, he brought the concept of “Hindutva” ideology.
His other famous literary work:
“Hindutva: Who is a Hindu?”
“Transportation for life”,
“Kale Pani” and “Gandhi Gondhal”.
He was the first person to use the terms like “Hindutva", “Hindu Rashtra" and “Akhand
Bharat”.
He also criticised Gandhi’s policies.
In 1937 he became the president of the Hindu Mahasabha (1937-1943).
6
During the Second world war opposed the Quit India movement and supported armed training to
Hindus and gave the slogan, “Hinduise all politics and Militarise Hindudom”.
Madan Lal Dhingra:
In 1905, he went to England in 1905 for studies and came in contact with independence activists
like Shyamji Krishna Varma and VD Savarkar.
There he shot dead Col. William Wyllie.
He had differences with his father on his political opinion.
Revolutionaries in Bengal:
The militant nationalism developed in Bengal during the 1860s and 1870s.
The primary focus was given on physical movement culture for which many Akhadas or gyms were
developed during this time.
There were psychological attempts to break away from the colonial stereotype of effeminacy
imposed on Bengalis. For instance, Swami Vivekananda had strong muscles and nerves of steel.
In 1902 Calcutta, Gym was started by Sarala Ghosal in Ballygunge. Atmonnatti Samiti by youth.
Anushilan samiti was started by Satish Chandra Basu.
In 1906 Dacca Branch of Anushilan Samiti was started by Pulin Behari Das.
All Bengal Conference of revolutionaries was held in December.
The revolutionary groups also started a Weekly named Yugantar.
In 1902, Midnapur Society was also founded.
Anushilan Samiti:
The Anushilan Samiti was founded in 1902. The meaning of Anushilan
Samiti is “body building society”.
There were three societies under this
By Satish Chandra Basu and P. Mitra
By Sarala Devi
Jatin Banerjee (Niralamba Swami) and Aurobindo Ghosh along
with Barindranath Ghose (Barin).
Barindra Kumar Ghosh founded “Jugantar” along with Bhupendranath
Dutta.
Important leaders were: Barindra Kumar Ghosh (associated with Yugantar); Hemchandra
Qanungo; Jatindranath Banerjee; Pramotha Mitra; Aurobindo Ghosh (associated with Vande
Mataram)
Till 1907 – 08, it remained insignificant and its activities mostly remained confined to giving
physical and moral training to the members.
First Swadeshi Dacoity or robbery took place in Rangpur in August 1906.
7
Later it became a society itself and actively took part in various revolutionary activities.
In 1907, the Yugantar group attempted to assassinate Sir Fuller, a very unpopular British
official and former Lt. Governor of East-Bengal and Assam.
Sandhya and Yugantar (Jugantor) in Bengal and Kal in Maharashtra became journals advocating
revolutionary activities.
In 1906, Yugantar Group had headquarters in Calcutta in western part of Bengal.
It was formed by the inner and core circle of Anushilan Samiti.
Main leaders were Barindra Kumar Ghosh, Bagha Jatin, Bhupendranath Dutta and Rash Behari
Bose.
Out of these Barindra Kumar Ghosh and Bagha Jatin formed the Maniktala group responsible for
manufacturing of bombs.
The members were sent to abroad for political and military training some were sent to:
North America: Surendra Mohan Bose, Guran Ditt Kumar and Tarak Nath Das.
Paris (France): Hemchandra Kanungo training under Russian Revolutionary.
Muzaffarpur Conspiracy:
Prafulla Chaki and Khudiram Bose threw bombs at Carriage occupied by Magistrate Douglas
Kingsford (Dist. Judge) and killed two women instead.
Prafulla Chaki shot himself and Khudiram Bose was hanged to death.
Yugantar planned to revolt Britishers with the help of Germans in the form of an Indo-German plot.
Plan included import of German ammunitions by Birendranath Chattopadhyay also known as
“Chatto” for funding dacoities were done known as “taxicab dacoities” and “boat dacoties”.
Bagha Jatin was killed during this activity.
Khudiram Bose (1889 – 1908):
He was India’s youngest revolutionary, who was martyred in 1908.
He was inspired by the Ghosh Brothers Lectures and teachings.
He joined Anushilan Samiti.
Bhupendranath Dutta (1880-1961):
He was the younger brother of Swami Vivekananda.
He joined Brahmo Samaj led by Keshub Chandra Sen and Debendranath Tagore.
He was an Indian revolutionary and a noted sociologist and anthropologist.
Bhupendranath Dutta was closely associated with the Yugantar movement.
He edited the Yugantar Patrika till his arrest and imprisonment in 1907.
After release, he left India for the United States. After his arrival, he stayed at the "India House"
for a while
9
He took memberships of German Anthropological Society in 1920 and German Asiatic Society
in 1924.
Later he joined the Indian National Congress.
In 1927, he became a member of Bengal Regional Congress in 1927-28.
In 1929, he was a member of the All-India Congress Committee. In the annual conference of Indian
National Congress organised in Karachi in 1930.
Barindra Kumar Ghosh (1880-1959):
He was the brother of Aurobindo Ghosh and born in London.
After returning to India, he started participating in revolutionary activities
with Bagha Jatin, he formed the Maniktala Group which collected arms
and manufactured bombs at Calcutta.
He was among the founding members of Yugantar (Jugantar).
He also worked on publishing Yugantar (Jugantar) in 1906.
He was convicted in the Alipore and Maniktala Bomb Conspiracy case
and deported to Cellular Jail, Andaman.
He was released in 1920 and after that he pursued journalism.
Alipore Bomb Conspiracy:
Aftermath of Muzaffarpur conspiracy revealed Maniktala Bomb Factory.
The Ghosh brothers (Aurobindo Ghosh and Barindra Kumar Ghosh) arrested for this trial known
as Alipore Bomb Conspiracy.
During the trial, members of Yugantar, killed those favouring the Britishers for trial. DSP Samsul
Aslam was shot dead. Bagha Jatin was arrested and released. Again arrested in Howrah-Shibpur
conspiracy case (1910-11).
Narendra Gosain (turned approver) was shot dead by two co accused Satyendranath Bose and
Kanailal Dutta in jail.
Bagha Jatin was charged with conspiring to wage war and tampering loyalty of Indian soldiers (Jat
Regiment). Later Bagha Jatin was released.
Barindra Kumar Ghosh was sentenced to death and Aurobindo was acquitted with the help of
Chittaranjan Das.
Newspapers including the Sandhya, Yugantar in Calcutta and Kal in Maharashtra were
popular.
Pamphlet
Bhavani Mandir: published and penned by Aurobindo Ghosh (anonymously)
Vartaman Rananiti: Barindra Kumar Ghose
Mukti Kon Pathe: Abinah Chandra Bhattacharya
10
In 1907 Punjab was at unrest due to Punjab Colonisation Act 1906 according to which the
government promised to allot free land to ex-serviceman and peasants to arid areas of western
Punjab which were irrigated by drawing water from rivers. Later it refused and passed an Act which
mentioned that property of a person shall be transferred to the government in case the person died
without leaving any heirs.
Affected people went to Lala Lajpat Rai and later accepted the leadership of Sardar Ajit Singh
(uncle of Bhagat Singh) to fight this cause.
In Punjab
The Bharat Mata Society was formed by Sardar Ajit Singh.
It was also known as “Anjuman-e-Muhibban-e-Watan.
To organise people who prefer to go beyond moderate methods of the Congress.
Major members were Mahashay Ghasita Ram and Sufi Amba Prasad.
Planning to re-enact 1857 in 1907.
Pagdi Sambhal Jatta
The organisation was formed by Ajit Singh in 1907.
The primary objective was to oppose the Colonisation Act, by delivering fiery speeches and
mass rallies.
Banke Dayal gave the “Pagdi Sambhal Jatta” song at the Lyallpur rally.
12
Many prominent leaders were arrested, including Lalaji and Ajit and sent to Mandalay. They
were released after mass protests later Lalaji left for the USA and Ajit fled to Persia and
returned to India in March 1947. last breath on 15 August 1947.
Lal Chand Falak, Bhai Parmananda and Lala Hardayal, Sufi Ambaprasad turned into
fully revolutionary.
Delhi
Delhi Conspiracy Case (1912)
In December 1912, Delhi Conspiracy case: Threw bomb at Lord Hardinge while he was
making official entry in the new capital of Delhi in a procession through Chandni Chowk.
Basant Kumar Biswas, Amir Chand and Awadh Behari were convicted and executed.
Rash Behari Bose evaded arrest due to disguise (in Dehradun).
Bhai Parmananda (1876-1947):
He was the prominent leader of the Hindu Mahasabha and missionary with the Arya Samaj
movement.
In 1905, he visited South Africa and stayed with Mahatma Gandhi as a Vedic missionary.
In 1910, he visited Guinea, centre of Arya Samaj in the Caribbean.
In 1911, he met Lala Hardayal and persuaded him to move to the USA.
He was the founding member of the Ghadar Party and wrote a book for the Ghadar Party called
Tarikh-I-Hind.
He was arrested in First Lahore Conspiracy Case and was sentenced to death in 1915 later
converted into imprisonment.
He raised voice for harsh treatment of political prisoners and went on hunger strike.
King-Emperor, George V, released him in 1920 as the result of a general amnesty order.
Madras:
Vanchinathan Iyer (1886-1911), Tamil revolutionary assassinated British officer Ashe responsible
for firing on a crowd who were protesting the arrest of VO Chidambaram.
He aided VVS Aiyar who was associated with Abhinav Bharat Society Pondicherry
branch.
He was associated with Bharatha Matha Association.
V. V. S. Aiyar (1881-1925)
He was an Indian revolutionary from Tamil Nadu.
He was known as the father of modern Tamil short stories. He translated the Ramavatharam of
Kamban and Tirukkural into English.
V.V.S Aiyar was the mentor of Vanchinathan.
In London, Aiyar came into contact with Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, at the India House.
13
Under Savarkar's influence Aiyar began to take an active role in the militant struggle for Indians.
Aiyar wrote the book ‘A Study of Kamba Ramayana’.
He was the editor of the newspaper Desabhaktan (Patriot).
Vanchinatha Iyer (1886 –1911)
Vanchinathan participated in revolutionary activities against the Britishers.
In 1911 he assassinated Robert Ashe, the district collector of Tirunelveli, who was also known as
Collector Dorai by shooting at point-blank range when Ashe's train had stopped at the Maniyachi
Station, enroute to Madras.
He committed suicide thereafter. The railway station has since been renamed Vanchi Maniyachi.
The mastermind behind the assassination was Nilakanta Brahmachari who went around the
Madras presidency in 1910 recruiting cadres and hatching plots against the British.
Nilakanta Bramhachari, Vaanchinathan, and Shankar Krishna Aiyar found an organisation
called Bharatha Matha Association which plots the assassination of influential British men.
Outside India:
London (England)
Shyamaji Krishna Varma
He founded the Indian Home Rule Society 1905 also known as India Home.
The objective was to serve Indian students and promote nationalist, views support by
Dadabhai Naoroji and Madam Cama.
He published a monthly Journal “The Indian Sociologist” later which was banned.
Madan Lal Dhingra
He assassinated Wyllie
After visiting Shyamaji in London, he went to Paris.
USA
Lala Hardayal
The Ghadar Movement was started by Lala Hardayal supported by Ram Chandra
and Barkatullah.
They published a paper named Ghadar on the lines of 1857
Later, Lala Hardayal left the USA.
Germany
Indian Independence Committee at Berlin in 1915, Berlin Committee for Indian
Independence backing of German Foreign Officers.
Virendra Chattopadhyay with Hardayal and Bhupendra Dutta were associated with the
committee.
The objective was to incite rebellion and supply arms.
14
He was the pioneering immigrant in the west coast of North America and organised the Asian
Indian immigrants in favour of the Indian independence movement.
He established Hindustani Association in Vancouver in 1907.
He founded the Swadesh Sevak Home with GD Kumar, for the children of the Asian Indian
immigrants at New Westminster.
Tarak Nath Das was the founding member of the Ghadar Party.
He was one of the first leaders of the Indian community in North America to start a paper called
‘Free Hindustan’.
Other Important Contributions of the Revolutionaries:
Ramanath Puri issued a Circular-e-Azadi [San Francisco, US]
G. D. Kumar set up a Swadeshi Sevak Home in Vancouver.
Raja Mahendra Pratap and Barkatullah, with the support of Germany and Russia, set up the
provisional government of India in Kabul.
With Pandurang Khankhoje (B. G. Tilak’s emissary), Tarak Nath Das founded the Indian
Independence League.
Adhar Laskar arrived from Calcutta with funds sent by Jatin Mukherjee permitting Tarak to start
his journal Free Hindusthan in English as well as in Gurumukhi edition.
Swadeshi Sevak (Servants of the Motherland) by Guran Ditt Kumar who came from Calcutta.
Lala Hardayal (1884-1939)
He was born in Delhi.
Lala Hardayal was an Indian nationalist revolutionary and freedom fighter who turned down a
career in the Indian Civil Service.
He was associated with Shyam Krishna Varma, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and Bhikaiji
Cama. He also drew inspiration from Giuseppe Mazzini, Karl Marx and Mikhail Bakunin.
In 1907, he wrote a letter to “The Indian Sociologist” exploring the anarchist ideas and his critical
article to the government put him in the eye of Britishers.
Lala Lajpat Rai advised him to go to Paris and became editor of the Vande Mataram.
Then he went to Martinique, where he started living a life of austerity. An Arya Samaj Missionary,
Bhai Parmanand went there to look for him and found him lonely and isolated.
In 1911, he then moved to the US and became involved in industrial unionism and served as
secretary of the San Francisco branch of the Industrial Workers of the World. There he came
across the farmers and their exploitation by the Canadians and British Government.
With the passing of anti-immigrant laws by Canada. With the personal help of Teja Singh, Tarak
Nath Das and Arthur Pope he set up the Guru Govind Singh Sahib Educational Scholarship
for Indian students. With Shyamji Krishna Verma's India House in London, he established his
house as a home for these students.
16
On the attempt of throwing a bomb to the viceroy by Basant Biswas he was relieved that
revolutionary fire was still alive in India. He went to the Nalanda Club composed of nationalist
students to cheer up.
In 1914, he was arrested by the United States government for spreading anarchist literature
and fled to Berlin. In Berlin he became instrumental to the formation of the Berlin Committee and
cooperated with the German Intelligence Bureau for the East.
Hindu German Conspiracy:
The Hindu–German Conspiracy was a series of plans between 1914 and 1917 by Indian
nationalist groups to attempt Pan-Indian rebellion against the British Raj during World War I,
formulated between the Indian revolutionary underground and exiled or self-exiled nationalists who
formed, in the United States, the Ghadar Party the Indian independence committee or Berlin
committee
The conspiracy was drawn up at the beginning of the war, with extensive support from the
German Foreign Office, the German consulate in San Francisco, as well as some support from
Ottoman Turkey and the Irish republican movement.
The most prominent plan attempted to foment unrest and trigger a Pan-Indian mutiny in the
British Indian Army from Punjab to Singapore.
This plot was planned to be executed in February 1915 with the aim of overthrowing British
rule over the Indian subcontinent.
The February mutiny was ultimately thwarted when British intelligence infiltrated the
Ghadarite movement and arrested key figures.
17
Virendranath Chattopadhyaya was arrested on 15 July 1937 during the Great Purge of Stalin and
was executed on 2 September 1937.
Government Retaliation
Prevention of Seditious Meeting Act 1907
To make better provision for the prevention of public meetings likely to promote sedition or to
cause a disturbance of public tranquillity was a 1907 act of the Imperial Legislative Council of
the British Raj enabling the government to prohibit political meetings.
The Explosive Substance Act 1908
As per this act, any person with any explosive substance commits any act either rashly or by
negligence that endangers human life or arises a situation that may cause hurt or injury to any
other person, then he/she shall be punished under IPC.
The Indian Criminal Law Amendment Act 1908
This act provided for the more speedy trial of certain offences, and for the prohibition of
“unlawful associations”, dangerous to the public peace.
The Newspaper (Incitement to Offence Act) 1908
It gave the magistrates power to confiscate press property that published objectionable material
likely to cause incitement to murder or acts of violence.
This act was triggered by the Extremist nationalist activity during and after the Swadeshi
movement of 1906.
The Press Act 1910
The Act empowered the Local Governments to issue warrants against any newspaper or book
which contained seditious matters, were to be forfeited to his majesty.
The Defence of India Rules 1915
This act was designed to give the government of British India special powers to deal with
revolutionary and German-inspired threats during World War I (1914–18), especially in the
Punjab.
A special legal tribunal was set up to deal with such cases without prior commitment and with
no appeal. Power was also taken for the internment of suspects.
Bagha Jatin (1879-1915)
He was born as Jatindranath Mukherjee in Bengal.
He was the founder member of Anushalin Samiti.
He faced Royal Bengal Tiger face to face, awarded by the Bengal government, given the title
Bagha.
In 1908, he contributed to found a branch of Anushilan Samiti in Darjeeling known as “Bandhab
Samiti”.
He was the main mastermind behind “India – German” plotting.
19
He was caught and wounded during a faceoff with Britisher and later died in 1915.
He had given the slogan “we shall die to awaken the nation”.
His Contributions:
He revitalised the organisation and strengthened the links of the organisation.
Hideouts at Sunderbans.
Created terror during WWI with the help of Zimmerman Plan or German plot
His plan was to organise Guerrilla force to start an uprising in the country, with seizure of fort
william and mutiny in armed forces.
During WW I, Jugantar (Yugantar) Party arranged to import German arms and ammunition
from abroad.
Jatin asked Rash Behari Bose to take charge of upper India to create an all Indian uprising
under the “Zimmerman plan” or German plot.
Raised funds through docaities called taxicab and boat docaities.
He planned to organise a guerilla force for the same and organised capture of Fort William,
disruption of rail etc.
Police located them while they were waiting for the arms in Balasore
He died fighting in Balasore Orissa Sept 1915.
Rash Behari Bose
He was known as "the most dangerous revolutionary in India”.
He spread his reach in North India and worked in Indian Forest Institute (Dehradun).
In 1912, he threw a bomb at Viceroy Hardinge.
He was interested in revolutionary activities from early on in his life, he left Bengal to shun the
Alipore bomb case trials of (1908). At Dehradun he worked as a head clerk at the Forest Research
Institute.
1912 assassination attempt on Lord Hardinge
The attempt was made on 23 December 1912 after Lord Hardinge was returning from the Delhi
Durbar of King George V. He was attacked by Basanta Kumar Biswas a disciple of Amrendar
Chattarjee, but he missed the target and failed. The bomb was made by Manindra Nath
Nayak. Bose was hunted by the colonial police due to his active participation in the failed
assassination attempt directed at the Governor General and Viceroy Lord Charles Hardinge in
Delhi.
Actually, Bose's aim was to prove to the world that Indians do not accept the subjection of his
country to foreign rule by consent, but by force of military power, which was successful.
Otherwise, he had no personal enmity with Lord Hardinge) He returned to Dehradun by the
night train and joined the office the next day as though nothing had happened. Further, he
20
organised a meeting of loyal citizens of Dehradun to condemn the dastardly attack on the
Viceroy.
Lord Hardinge, in his My Indian Years, described the whole incident in an interesting way. The
investigation following the assassination led to the Delhi Conspiracy Trial in which Besant
Kumar Viswas, Awadh Bihari and Amir Chand were convicted and executed.
Through Amarendra Chatterjee of the Jugantar led by Jatin Mukherjee (Bagha Jatin), he secretly got
involved with the revolutionaries of Bengal and he came across eminent revolutionary members of
the Arya Samaj in the UP and the Punjab.
During the flood relief work in Bengal in 1913, he came in contact with Jatin Mukherjee in whom
he "discovered a real leader of men," who "added a new impulse" to Rash Behari failing zeal.
Thus, during World War I he became extensively involved as one of the leading figures of the
Ghadar Revolution that attempted to trigger a mutiny in India in February 1915. Trusted and
tried Ghadrites were sent to several cantonments to infiltrate into the army. The idea of the Ghadar
leaders was that with the war raging in Europe most of the soldiers had gone out of India and the
rest could be easily won over. The revolution failed and most of the revolutionaries were arrested.
But Rash Behari managed to escape British intelligence and reached Japan in 1915 under the alias
of Priyanath Tagore, a relative of Rabindranath Tagore. There, Bose found shelter with various Pan-
Asian groups.
From 1915–1918, he changed residences and identities numerous times, as the British kept pressing
the Japanese government for his extradition. He married the daughter of Aizo Soma and Kokko
Soma, the owners of Nakamuraya bakery in Tokyo and noted Pan-Asian supporters in 1918, and
became a Japanese citizen in 1923, living as a journalist and writer. It is also significant that he was
instrumental in introducing Indian-style curry in Japan. Though more expensive than the usual
"British-style" curry, it became quite popular, with Rash Bihari becoming known as "Bose of
Nakamuraya".
Rash Behari Bose along with A M Nair was instrumental in persuading the Japanese authorities to
stand by the Indian nationalists and ultimately to officially actively support the Indian independence
struggle abroad. Bose convened a conference in Tokyo on 28–30 March 1942, which decided to
establish the Indian Independence League. At the conference, he moved a motion to raise an army
for Indian independence.
He convened the second conference of the League at Bangkok on 22 June 1942. It was at this
conference that a resolution was adopted to invite Subhas Chandra Bose to join the League and take
its command as its president.
The Indian prisoners of war captured by the Japanese in the Malaya and Burma fronts were
encouraged to join the Indian Independence League and become the soldiers of the Indian
National Army (INA), formed on 1 September 1942 as the military wing of Bose's Indian
21
National League. He selected the flag for the Azad Hind movement and handed over the flag to
Subhas Chandra Bose.
But although he handed over the power, his organisational structure remained, and it was on the
organisational spadework of Rash Behari Bose that Subhas Chandra Bose later built the
Indian National Army (also called 'Azad Hind Fauj'). Prior to his death caused by tuberculosis, the
Japanese Government honoured him with the Order of the Rising Sun (2nd grade).
Ghadar Movement
With the outbreak of World War various revolutionary groups including Tilak’s and Besant’s Home
Rule league and Ghadar revolutionaries took advantage of the engagement of Britain in WWI.
Lala Har Dayal was the moving spirit behind the organization of the Ghadar Party in 1913 at San
Francisco in the USA. Sohan Singh Bhakna was also a founder.
A weekly paper ‘The Ghadar’ was started. It was published in Urdu, Gurumukhi, Marathi and
English.
Ghadar published a series of Articles, entitled “Angrezi Raj Ka Kachcha chittha”. The Ghadritis
intended to bring about a revolt in India.
It highlighted the issues of India like poverty, exploitation, recurring famine and many atrocities
done by Britishers.
Circulated in America, Philippines, China, Hong Kong, Malay states, Singapore, Trunidada and
Honduras.
Their plans were encouraged by two events in 1914 – the Komagata Maru incident and the
outbreak of the First world war.
Komagata Maru was the name of a ship, this incident created an explosive situation in the Punjab.
The revolutionaries associated with Ghadar mainly included ex-soldiers and peasants who migrated
from Punjab to USA and Canada in search of better employment.
They were based in the USA and Canada along the western pacific coast.
They were denied entry to enter the USA and Canada and if they were allowed to settle they faced
many difficulties.
Restrictive measures were imposed on them.
The Secretary of State for India supported restrictive immigration laws, close interaction between
English and White undesirable and damaging British prestige.
In 1908, Indians were restricted from entering Canada.
According to Alien Land Law Indians were prohibited from purchasing land in the US.
All these discrimination at foreign land led to rise in the fire of avenge to throw out British rule in
India.
22
Pre Ghadr Revolutionary Activities: Before 1913, pre Ghadr revolutionary activities had been
carried out by Ramdas Puri, G.D Kumar, Taraknath Das, Sohan Singh Bhakna and Lala Hardayal.
They set-up a Swadesh Sevak Home in Vancouver and United India House Seattle.
In 1913, a priest named Bhagwan Singh openly preached violent means to overthrow British Rule.
The prominent leaders of Ghadr were: Lala Hardayal, Bhai Parmanand, Bhagwan singh,
Kartar Singh Sarabha and Barkatullah.
Formation of Ghadar Party
Pacific Coast Hindustan Association at Portland
It was formed in 1913 and also termed as Hindi Association.
Baba Sohan Singh Bhakna was elected president.
Lala Hardayal was the General secretary.
Pt. Kashi Ram Maroli was the treasurer.
Head Quarter was set up by the name of Yugantar Ashram at San Francisco.
Hindustan Ghadar Party
Hindustani Association changed to Hindustan Ghadar Party.
Members expanded to Japan, China, Philippines, Malay, Singapore, Thailand, South
Africa and Mexico.
Additional members were Baba Gurmukh Singh, Kartar Singh Sarabha, Rahmat Ali Shah
and Bhai Parmanand.
Principle and Ideology
They had Secular Ideology.
The main idea was to wage revolutionary war against the British in India. They believed that
“Indians can never be treated equal in foreign countries if they are enslaved in their own
countries.”
They believed in transmission of Ideas to India and spread within masses.
They also launched campaigns in North American farms and factories.
First Lahore Conspiracy Case (1915)
A series of trials was held in Lahore and in the United States, in the aftermath of the failed Ghadar
conspiracy from 26 April to 13 September 1915.
The backdrop of failed Ghadar Conspiracy, trial held at Lahore by special tribunal under Defence of
Indian Act 1915.
Government jolted Ghaderites Out of a total of 291 convicted conspirators, 42 were executed, 114
got life sentences and 93 got varying terms of imprisonment.
The uncovering of the conspiracy also saw the initiation of the Hindu German Conspiracy trial in
the United States.
23
After the release of some members, they formed Kirti and Communist Movements in Punjab.
Hardayal set up the Indian independence Committee at Berlin with an objective to incite rebellion
within Indian troops and provide ammunition to revolutionaries.
Raja Mahendra Pratap and Barkatullah aided the Amir of Afghanistan.
Kartar Singh Sarabha (1896-1915)
He was an Indian revolutionary. He was 15-years old when he became a member of Ghadar Party.
In 1912 Berkeley, he came into contact with Lala Hardayal, Sohan Singh Bhakna and
Pandurang Sadashiv Khankhoje, an agricultural scientist who formed the Pacific Coast
Hindustan Association in 1913.
Sarabha left his studies and became the Ghadr Party’s youngest founding member.
He worked shoulder to shoulder with the much older Ghadri “babas”, who began to call him
‘BalaJarnail (Boy general)’.
With World War-I breaking out in July 1914, the Ghadris decided to return to India including
Sarabha.
By 1915, the British began to arrest Ghadar party members and Sarabha was also arrested and put
on a trial in what came to be called the Lahore conspiracy case which resulted in the execution of
24 Ghadris.
He was hanged to death in Lahore in 1915 (hardly 19 years old).
Bhagat Singh often says that “Sarabha was his ustad.”
Komagata Maru Incident
The Komagata Maru incident involved the Japanese steamship Komagata Maru on which a group
of citizens of the British Raj attempted to emigrate to Canada in 1914 but were denied entry and
forced to return to Calcutta. There they were fired upon by British police resulting in the deaths of
20 Sikhs.
Komagata Maru sailed from British Hong Kong, via Shanghai, China, and Yokohama, Japan, to
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, in 1914, carrying 376 passengers from Punjab, British India.
Of them, 24 were admitted to Canada, but the other 352 passengers were not allowed to disembark
in Canada, and the ship was forced to return to India. The passengers comprised 340 Sikhs, 24
Muslims, and 12 Hindus, all British subjects. This was one of several incidents in the early 20th
century in which exclusion laws in Canada and the United States were used to exclude immigrants
of Asian origin.
Shore committee was set up under Hussain Rahim, Sohan Lal Pathak and Balwant Singh and
funds were raised and protests organised. But after 2 months the ship was sent back to India.
24
Note
Justin Trudeau issued a formal statement of apology in the House of Commons for the Komagata
Maru incident.
But Britain has not apologised or even accepted the formal responsibility to the massacre of Amritsar.
(Jallianwala Bagh Massacre).
Inflamed by the Komagata Maru Incident and WW1, Ghadarites decided to launch all india violent
attacks to oust the Britishers from India.
Kartar Singh Sarabha and Raghubar Dayal Gupta left for India.
They contacted Bengal revolutionaries and asked Sachin Sanyal and Rash Behari Bose to lead the
movement.
Dacoities were carried out in Punjab to raise funds. The raiders targeted mostly money lenders and
destroyed debt-records.
The Ghadrites fixed the date of Feb 21, 1915 for armed revolt in Ferozpur, Lahore and
Rawalpindi garrison.
However, the plan was foiled due to treachery. Rebellious regiments were disbanded and 45
Ghadrites were hanged.
Rash Behari Bose fled to Japan from where he along with Abani Mukherjee made efforts to send
arms. Sachin Sanyal was transported for life.
Achievements of Ghadar Party
The Ghadar Party successfully popularised the nationalist feeling in people who were divided in
self-interest of Britishers
Raised a group of young members to channelise their energy to expel Britishers.
Adopting secular Ideology, Ghaderites belong to different religions but still they stand together to
throw off British rule.
They adopted the slogan of Bande Matram instead of any religious verses.
Miscellaneous Societies
‘The Arya Bandhav Samaj’ was formed under the inspiration of Tilak.
Anant Laxman Karkare murdered Jackson (DM of Nasik).
In Madras province, Nilkantha Brahmachari and Vanchi Aiyar founded a secret Bharat Mata
Association.
Other Secret revolutionary societies were –
Suhrid Samiti and Sadhana Samiti of Mymensingh,
Swadesh Bandhav Samiti of Barisal,
The Brati Samiti of Faridpur.
25
In 1905, Barindra Kumar Ghose published the Bhavani Mandir followed by the publication of
‘Vartaman Rananiti’.
The Yugantar (edited by Bhupendranath Dutt) and Sandhya (edited by Brahmabandhab
Upadhyay) preached anti-British ideas.
Another pamphlet ‘Mukti Kon Pathe’ (which way lies salvation?) exhorted the Indian soldiers to
supply arms to revolutionaries.
Lala Lajpat Rai, Ajit Singh, Lalchand Falak and Bhai Parmanand were active in Punjab.
Suppression
The suppression meted out to Ghadrites was the most brutal one since the revolt of 1857.
The Defence of India Act was passed primarily with the purpose of quashing the Ghadar movement.
Large scale detention without trial was made.
Special courts were set up to give brutal punishments.
A large no. of army men were court martialed.
Apart from Ghadrites, even radical pan-Islamists were also actively participating in various
revolutionary activities. Ali brothers, Maulana Azad, Hasrat Mohani- were jailed.
Evaluation
The most significant achievement of Ghadr was its achievement on the line of ideology. It preached
militant nationalism with a completely secular approach.
It failed to achieve much because:
Lack of effective organisation.
Underestimation of the extent of preparation at every level- organisational, ideological,
financial and tactical.
Perhaps Lala Hardayal was unsuited for the job of an organiser.
Reasons for declining first phase of revolutionary era
Strong and draconian legislature by government
Fading the response of people
Influence of Gandhian principles
Induction of new constitutional reforms, Act of 1919.
Factor contributed to the rise of second phase of revolutionaries
Failure of Non-Cooperation
Slow motion of the movement.
Old and new organisations erupted in two broad strands one in northern and other in Bengal.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture - 39
Congress Ministries and WW - II
2
Kakori Conspiracy
❖ The most important action of the HRA was the Kakori robbery on 9 August 1925. Here the revolutionaries
held up the 8-Down train at Kakori (near lucknow) and looted the official railway cash.
❖ Conducted by:
⮚ Ram Prasad Bismil
⮚ Ashfaqullah Khan
⮚ Chandrashekhar Azad.
❖ Government crackdown after Kakori was severe.
❖ Four revolutionaries such as Bismil, Ashfaqullah, Roshan Singh and Rajendra Lahiri were hanged.
4
✓ Presenting a spirit of tolerance and considering religion as a matter of personal beliefs of man.
✓ To support this, he had written “Why I am an atheist”.
<
In Bengal
❖ Revolutionaries carried out furious underground activities and openly worked for congress to win the trust of
the masses.
❖ They preferred to work underground at the same time contributing in constructive work with congress.
❖ Chittaranjan Das played a role of link between congress and revolutionaries. After his death congress divided
into two wings one led by SC Bose and other by JM Sengupta.
❖ Revolutionaries divided too in Jugantar (SC Bose supporter) and Anushilan (Sengupta supporter).
❖ Charles Tegart Case: In 1924, Gopinath Saha was arrested for attempting to kill Charles Tegart (Police
commissioner of calcutta), but he erroneously killed Mr. Ernest Day and for this he was hanged later.
⮚ After this a massive arrest of revolutionaries took place and major leaders were arrested.
⮚ After release they re-arranged themselves in a revolting group inspired by Russian and Irish
Revolutionaries.
➢ In Chittagong, several villages were burnt and fines were imposed on many of them.
➢ J.L Nehru was charged with sedition and jailed as praised the revolutionaries.
❖ In 1925, the HRA manifesto declared that it “HRA stood for abolition of all systems which made
exploitation of man by man possible…”.
❖ It decided to work for an organised armed rebellion.
❖ By the late 1920s, the revolution had started to move from individual heroic action to mass politics.
❖ Ramprasad Bismil, during his last days appealed the youth to give up the guns and not to work in
revolutionary conspiracies. Instead, he urged them to work in open movements.
❖ He also urged them to build Hindu- Muslim unity and unite all political groups under the leadership of
congress.
❖ The famous statements of revolutionaries elaborating their positions has been written in the book “The
Philosophy of Bomb” written by Bhagwaticharan Vohra.
Congress Ministries
❖ What to do after the withdrawal of the movement?
⮚ There were basically their perspectives that were put forward:
1. The first one advocated for constructive work on Gandhian lines.
2. The New Swarajists: The second one favored constitutional struggle and participation in the
elections to the Central Legislative Assembly. It was advocated by M.A Ansari, Asaf Ali,
Bhulabhai Desai, B.C Roy, Satytamurthy.
3. The Third one, advocated by leftist within the congress and led by Nehru opposed both constructive
works. They favored continuation of non-constitutional mass struggle.
⮚ Nehru considered the withdrawal of the Civil Disobedience and council entry "a spiritual defeat",
"a surrender of ideas" and "a retreat from revolutionary to reformist mentality."
⮚ Nehru was against the Struggle - Truce - Struggle strategy and instead advocated for Struggle-
Victory Strategy.
⮚ However, ultimately, Nehru’s view was sidelined and congress approved council entry. In the Central
Legislative election of 1934, congress won 45 out of 75 seats.
Way Towards Constitutionalism
9
Manifesto of Congress
❖ It was adopted by AICC in August.
❖ Rejection of Act of 1935.
❖ It declared that independence will give Indians a power to solve their issues.
❖ To end all oppressive acts and regulations was the task of congress.
❖ Promises:
⮚ Political established of civil liberty
⮚ Peasant welfare
⮚ Release of political prisoner
⮚ Untouchability eradication
⮚ Upliftment of women
⮚ Encouragement of indigenous products
⮚ Descent payment to workers and better condition of work
⮚ Protection of labour rights
❖ Resolution passed:
⮚ Condemning Italy’s aggression in Abyssinia and Japanese aggression in China.
⮚ Demanded constitutional assembly to frame a constitution.
❖ Adopted agrarian programme:
⮚ Reduction (50%) in rent & Revenue and exemption of uneconomic holding from it. Root out arrears of
rent.
⮚ Taxation of agricultural income
⮚ Abolition of feudal levies and forced labour
⮚ Promoting Cooperative farming
⮚ Modification of ejectment laws and recognition of peasant unions.
❖ No mention of abolition of Zamindari and Taluqdari System. But it was
a significant achievement of the Faizpur session.
❖ The 1935 Act was condemned by nearly all sections. Congress unanimously rejected the Act and instead
demanded a Constituent Assembly elected on the basis of Universal Adult Franchise to frame a constitution
for Independent India.
❖ Gandhi’s Position: He initially opposed the acceptance of office but later agreed to give it a try. He advised
the congressmen to hold this office lightly and not tightly. He told them to see these offices as ‘Crowns of
thorns’.
❖ In 1936, the Bombay meetings of AICC decided in favour of contesting the election.
❖ AICC postponed their decision on office acceptance to post election.
❖ Federal part never came into force.
❖ Only the provincial part came into force in 1937.
❖ Elections were held in February 1937 in 11 provinces: Madras; Central provinces; Bihar; Orissa; UP;
Bombay; Assam; NWFP; Bengal; Punjab and Sindh.
⮚ Congress won in 6 provinces
⮚ Total seats 1585
⮚ Congress 707
⮚ Muslim league 106
✓ Muslim League lost badly and got only 51 out of 482 seats reserved for Muslims.
✓ Congress refused to share power with Muslim league.
✓ In March 1937, AICC sanctioned office acceptance overriding objections of Nehru and Congress
Socialist Party. [Gandhiji compromised and endorsed]
Rajendra Resolution
❖ The resolution put forward for the “conditional acceptance” of office. Gandhi also accepted.
❖ The Governor will not use special power to intervene in the functioning of ministries.
❖ The time when congress went to form ministries in the majority region, the governor refused to give assurance
on this due to the condition specified by congress.
❖ Government formed interim ministries in these regions (continued only for 6 months because of lack of
majority).
❖ Rajagopalachari and GD Birla, put all their effort to influence Congress Working Committee in favor of Office
acceptance.
❖ Gandhi finally gave a green signal.
Province Congress Prime Minister/Premiers
UP GB Pant
Bihar Krishna Sinha
CP NB Khare
Madras C. Rajagopalachari
Orissa Hare Krishna Mehtab
Bombay BG Kher
NWFP Dr. Khan Saheb
Sind congress supported Ministry of Hidayatullah
Assam Congress Supported Ministry of Gopinath Bordoloi
Bengal Fazlul Haq invited Congress later joined with League
Punjab not dominant to play any role.
Parliamentary Sub-Committee
❖ The Committee acted as central board formed with Sardar Patel, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad and Rajendra
Babu as members.
❖ The primary objective was to counter the acts of Britishers to demolish the provincialization of Congress.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 40
World War Dilemma and
Cripps Mission
2
Bombay/CP and NWFP reform extended security of tenure to tenants were carried out.
Passing of several debtor’s relief act provided regulation on money lender’s business.
Liberating tied serfs (dublas)
Abolition of grazing fees
Major Hindrances:
Ministries did not have enough power and resources.
Due to constraint of time Ministries could not do much to address the issues.
There was a growing war possibility during 1938s.
Also, the Congress runs states dominated by money lenders, capitalists and landlords.
There was also a complex agrarian structure.
Labour Welfare:
There was an advance in workers' interests kept in mind while promoting industrial peace.
Efforts were made in reducing strikes and arbitration before restoring to strikes.
Worked on the balance between labour and capitalists.
Efforts were also made for improved conditions and secured wages.
The Textile Enquiry Committee (Bombay) recommended an increase in wages, implemented.
Industrial Dispute Act, 1938 passed replaces direct action with negotiations and arbitration.
Labour Enquiry Committee (Headed by Rajendra Prasad) recommended increase in wages (min. 15 per
month), benefits and recognition of Left-dominated Majdur Sabha.
Wardha Scheme of Basic Education:
All India National Education Conference (Wardha Educational Conference) held in 1937 and it was
presided by Mahatma Gandhi.
Self-supporting schemes of Basic education (Nai Talim, Wardha Scheme) were put forward.
The main objective was to learn through activity and roam near to manual productive work.
Free and compulsory education in mother tongue for 7 years was promoted.
Emphasis was given to vocational and manual training, production of handicraft.
A Basic Education committee under Zakir Hussain was formed
Introduction of basic craft education through industry and vocation.
Teacher welfare schemes and promoting self-support to students.
Non-inclusion of religion education.
Recommendations were opposed by Muslim league.
Utilization of Office:
According to the office acceptance strategy congress will promote mass mobilization.
Organization of committees in villages.
Setting up of congress grievances committee at district level.
Congress police station and Panchayat for dispensing justice.
Mass petitions to officials, States’ Peoples movement and mass literacy campaign were organized.
4
Evaluation:
The work done by the congress ministries disapproved the myth that Indians were not fit to rule.
Also, people were able to perceive how things were going to be after independence.
Overall, their record was certainly positive. They resigned in October 1939 due to the deadlock created by
WW - II.
Haripura Session, 1938 (58th Session):
Under the presidency of Subhas Chandra Bose, Indian National Congress (INC) was held at Haripura, Gujarat
in 1938.
In this session, a resolution was passed:
A six months ultimatum given to the British Government demanding independence for India, if British
fail then congress should launch an all-out struggle, to throw out the British from India.
It was in this 1938 Haripura session when the differences between Gandhi and Bose surfaced over their
attitudes towards Great Britain.
Tripuri Crisis:
In 1939, Subhash Chandra Bose stood again for the presidential race but as a representative of militant and
radical groups.
This was, however, objected by Patel, Prasad and Kriplani on the ground that the president is the
constitutional head which represents unity of the nation.
With support of Gandhi, leaders put Pattabhi Sitaramayya as presidential candidate.
Bose termed leaders who opposed him as “Gandhists” and accused them of compromising to federalism.
In the same year Bose won election, Gandhi was upset with his ideology and many members resigned
including Congress Working Committee members.
Tripuri Congress Session (near Jabalpur, MP, 1939):
Govind Ballabh Pant passed a resolution, expressing faith in Gandhi’s leadership and old Congress Working
Committee and asked Bose to nominate his working committee on Gandhi’s recommendation.
The resolution was passed by a huge majority, Bose resigned and subsequently Congress lost support from
Communist and Congress Socialists.
Rajendra Prasad was elected as new president.
Subhash Chandra Bose and his followers founded Forward Block (party) within congress.
He called for an all India protest for what happened to him. As a result, he was removed as president of
Bengal Pradesh Congress Committee (PCC) and debarred from holding any office of congress for
three years.
Gandhi on Subhash Victory:
Mahatma Gandhi said,
“I am glad of his (Subhash’s) victory….and since I was instrumental in inducing Dr. Pattabhi not to
withdraw his name after Maulana Azad Sahib done so, the defeat is more mine than his….”.
When Bose was asked to form working committee on recommendation of Gandhi
6
“…after all Subhash Babu is not the enemy of our country…he has suffered for it”. In His opinion, his is
the most forward and boldest policy and programme….the minority can only wish him all the best…”
Supporters included the All-India Depressed Classes Association, Dalit leader B. R. Ambedkar and the
Independent Labour Party, E. V. Ramasami, as well as some Parsis, and Anglo-Indians.
The congress working committee, which met on September 10-14, 1939 at Wardha (Maharashtra) ,
stressed that “the issue of war and peace for India must be decided by the Indian people”.
Congress’s Demand
The Indians' cooperation in the war was possible only if two conditions were fulfilled. These were:
After the war, constituent assembly should be convened to determine the political structure of free India.
Some form of genuinely responsible Govt should be established at the centre immediately.
Congress Stand at Wardha (September 1939):
Gandhiji
His attitude was still that India should not seek her independence out of Britain’s ruin because that
was not the way of non-violence.
He stood against fascism.
He wanted to help allied powers against the axis powers but before that India should be given
freedom.
Nehru
He believed that justice was on the side of Britain, France and Poland.
But he was also convinced that Britain, France and Poland were the imperialist powers and the war
was the result of their inner contradictions of capitalism maturing since WW – I.
He was in favor of no Indian participation till freedom was granted to India. However, he was also
not in favor of mass struggle which could make the situation difficult for Britain.
Subhash Chandra Bose
Subhash Chandra Bose opposed the policy of cooperation and believed that Britain’s peril offered a
rare opportunity to India to achieve freedom.
Both sides were not worth supporting.
Instead, he insisted to use this opportunity against Britain
Similar position by Acharya Narendra Dev and Jayaprakash Narayan
Congress Working Commission Resolution at Wardha:
India could not be a party to war being fought for democratic freedom while that freedom was being denied to
India.
If Britain was fighting for democracy and freedom, it should prove it by ending imperialism in its colonies and
establishing full democracy in India.
Government should declare its war aims and also how the principles of democracy were to be applied to India.
Government Response:
Linlithgow tried to use Muslim League and Princes against the congress.
He refused to define war aims beyond stating that Britain was resisting aggression.
He said that the Government would consult representatives of several communities, parties and princes
and modify the GOI Act 1935 accordingly.
Basically, the Britishers resorted to their old strategy of ‘Divide and Rule’. They had no intention of
loosening their hold in India during or after the war.
In January 1940, Linlithgow stated that “Dominion status of Westminster type, after the war, is the
goal of British policy in India”.
Congress ministries resigned in Oct, 1939.
10
In Jan 1940, Linlithgow stated that “Dominion status of Westminster type, after the war, is the goal of British
policy in India”.
Jinnah and Muslim League celebrated it as the Day of Deliverance and also received support from B.R.
Ambedkar.
Gandhi’s view of mass struggle:
Congress was in a dilemma of mass struggle.
Gandhi’s view on mass struggle
He was not in favor of the mass struggle because he felt:
The Allied cause was just.
Lack of Hindu-Muslim unity could result in communal riots.
Congress’s organization was weak.
Masses were not ready.
Gandhi advocated to strengthen congress’s organization, carrying political work among masses, and resort
to negotiation with Britishers.
Note: These were the prime reasons why Gandhi later launched Individual satyagraha.
Muslim League (1940)
In March at Lahore – The Muslim League float the idea of Two Nation Theory was
Elevated Muslims from status of ‘Minority’ to Nation. Jinnah became sole spokesperson.
Grouping Muslims majority states as independent states (area not specified).
Safeguard rights where Muslims are in minority.
“Pakistan Resolution” was introduced by Fazlul Haq.
Leftist
However, the leftists within the congress led by S.C. Bose was in favor of an all-out mass struggle. They
felt that the masses were ready and were just waiting for the call.
They accepted the Hindu-Muslim unity factor and weakness of Congress’s organization. But argued that
these would be strengthened only during the course of the movement.
Hitler’s continuous victories in Europe brought Britain at back foot. To seek India’s cooperation in war efforts
and to end the constitutional deadlock, Viceroy Lord Linlithgow made an offer which is known as ‘August
offer’. The main points of this offer were as below—
a) The Governor-General would invite a certain number of Indian representatives to join his Executive
council to set up a ‘War Advisory Council’.
b) The constitution-making body was to be set up after the war where mainly Indians would decide the
constitution subject to fulfillment of Government of India’s obligation regarding Defence, minority rights,
treaty with states, All India services.
c) It also proposed Dominion Status as the objective for India.
d) The British government would not transfer power to any system of government whose authority would
be denied by a “large and powerful element in India’s national life.” This was, in fact, an assurance to the
Muslim League.
Congress rejected the ‘August Offer’. Jawaharlal Nehru said that the whole idea of dominion status, on
which the offer was based, was “as dead as a doornail.”
Muslim league welcomed the veto given to it but reiterated that “it would not be satisfied with anything short
of the partition of India.”
Significance:
For the first time, the inherent right of Indians to frame their constitution was recognised.
Congress’s demand to concede constituent assembly was accepted.
Dominion status was explicitly offered.
July 1941
Viceroy’s executive council was expanded with 8 out of 12 members Indians. However, Britishers
remained in control of Defence, Finance and Home.
The National Defence Council was set up whose function was purely advisory.
Ramgarh (presently Jharkhand) Session of 1940:
Maulana Abul Azad declared that “India cannot endure Nazism and Fascism, but she is more tired of
British imperialism”.
He passed a resolution declaring the need to launch a civil disobedience movement.
Opposed by a coalition of left-wing groups (Congress socialist, communists and members of Kisan Sabha and
Forward block) all these held an anti-compromise conference at Ramgarh at Subhash Chandra Bose and
resolved to resist any adjustment with imperialism and prepare themselves for struggle.
Individual Satyagraha or Delhi Chalo Movement Oct 1940-41 (Ramgarh Congress- May 1940):
Unsatisfied with the August offer, the Congress decided to launch Individual Satyagraha.
Vinoba Bhave was the first to offer the Satyagraha and Nehru, the Second.
About 25,000 people had gone to Jail by June, 1941.
The aim was to show that nationalist patience was not due to Weakness and to express
people’s feeling that they made no distinction between Nazism and the double autocracy
that ruled India.
12
The demand of Satyagrahis would be freedom of speech against the war through an anti-war declaration. If the
Govt did not arrest them they would move into the villages and start a march towards Delhi. Hence the
movement is also called the Delhi Chalo Movement.
Changing equation of war by 1942:
Britain was facing back-to-back defeat. Most disastrous defeat of Britain in the entire history of world power.
On 22nd June 1941, an attack of Germany on Russia took place under Operation Barbarossa.
On 7th Dec, Japan backed Germany and attacked Pearl Harbour and occupied the South East Asia region
including Philippines, Indonesia, Malay, Burma and Indo-China.
Gandhi denounced “Asia for Asiatic” slogan of Japanese and asked Indian to denounce Japanese goods.
In Dec 1941, Congress Working Committee passed a resolution that India would provide full support to Britain
if it agreed to give full independence after the war.
During this time Gandhi stated that “Not Rajaji (Rajgopalchari) but Jawahar will be my successor…I know
that when I am gone, he will speak my language”.
In 1941 the Individual Satyagraha eventually called off.
In 1941, the eight-year-old ban on the communist party of India was revoked on the condition it would support
the government in war.
On the other hand
Germany captured most of Europe and attacked the Soviet Union.
Japan attacked Pearl Harbour, Indonesia, Malaysia, Burma
In March 1942 Japan reached Rangoon.
Congress leaders were released in December 1941 and they were anxious to
defend India against Japan.
The Congress Working Committee passes a resolution offering support if
following condition is fulfilled overriding the views of Gandhi and Nehru:
full independence after war
substance of power to be transferred immediately.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture - 41
Quit India Movement
2
Sir Stafford Cripps was assigned the duty of winning the cooperation of India and to pacify the Indian
leaders.
The pressure exerted from the U.S., particularly after Japan attacked the U.S. Naval base at Pearl Harbor,
also had been responsible for this Cripps Mission.
Sir Stafford Cripps was Chairman Member of the Labour party and Cabinet minister. He Favoured Indian
national Movement.
Jawaharlal Nehru and Maulana Azad were the official negotiators for the congress.
The important proposals offered by the Cripps were as below:
Proposals of Interim settlement .
The responsibility of India’s defence would remain with the British.
To raise the resources of men, money and material with a view to assisting the British in war would
be the task of the Indian government.
Post- War Proposals:
India shall be given dominion status. It would be free to decide its relations with the British
commonwealth and free to participate in the United Nations and other international bodies.
A constitution making body will be created. Members of the Constituent assembly would be partly
elected through proportional representation partly nominated by princes.
Indian states and provinces were given the right of remaining out of the India union in case they did not
approve of the new constitution.
The new constitution making body would negotiate a treaty with the British Government to transfer
power and safeguard racial and religious minorities.
In the meantime, defence of India would remain in British hands and the governor-general’s powers would
remain as it is.
Significance
Constitution making was now solely in the hands of Indians. (Not ‘mainly Indians’ as in August offer).
A concrete plan came into being for the formation of constituent assembly.
Option was made available to provinces to have a separate constitution, thus creating a blueprint for India’s
partition.
Indians were allowed a large share in the administration in the interim period.
3
In May 1942
He urged the British — “Leave India to God or to anarchy. This orderly disciplined anarchy should go,
and if as a result there is complete lawlessness, I would risk it.”
Though the need for non-violence was always reiterated, the famous Quit India resolution was passed by
the Bombay session of the AICC on 8 August 1942.
Scorched-earth policy: It is a military strategy that aims to destroy anything that might be useful to the
enemy while it is advancing through or withdrawing from a location. ... The practice can be carried out by
the military in enemy territory, or in its own home territory.
Three Phases:
1. Urban Revolt: There was an urban revolt such as Strikes, Boycott, picketing, etc.
2. Mid-August
Countrywide peasant rebellion engaged in destruction of the communication system and attacked the
Government building formation of “National Government”also known as parallel governments..
3. Underground Activities:
This was undertaken by the Socialists, Forward Bloc members, Gandhi ashramites, revolutionaries in
Bombay, Poona, Satara, Baroda and parts of UP, Bihar, Delhi, Gujrat, Karnataka, Kerala and Andhra.
Personalities involved: Ram Manohar Lohiya, Jayprakash Narayan, Aruna Asaf Ali, Usha
Mehta, Biju Patnaik, Chhotubhai Puranik, Achyut Patwardhan, Sucheta Kriplani, and R.P
Goenka.
Radical group under J.P. Narayan engaged in guerrilla warfare at Indo – Nepal Border.
Centrist Group under Aruna Asaf Ali (socialist) volunteers for sabotage.
Sucheta Kripalani (Gandhian Group) but engaged in violent activities and sabotaging the war
communication system.
Usha Mehta started an underground radio in Bombay.
Parallel Government:
Many places witnessed temporary seizure of state control and there established a temporary government
often termed as swaraj.
Ballia (August 1942, UP): first parallel government under Chittu Pandey (Sher-e-Ballia). He also
helped many congressmen to come out of jail.
Tamluk (Midnapore, Bengal): Jatiya Sarkar established under Satish Samant. Set up own department
of law and order, health, education, Agriculture etc. Contributing towards relief work, arbitration work
and forming armed Vidyut Vahini.
Satara Maharashtra: formed the longest lasting parallel Government. “Prati Sarkar '' under Nana
Patil. Setup of Nyayadan Mandals (people’s court), set up village libraries and organised Gandhi
Marriage (allowed no ostentation, invited the untouchables etc.). Supported from the ruler of Aundh (a
Gandhian), a constitution framed by Gandhi. Prati Sarkar lasted till 1945.
Talcher: Laxman Nayak important tribal and rebel leader of this region.
Parallel governments were also established at Azamgarh, Ghazipur, Monghyr, Muzaffarpur.
Mass Participation:
Youth: They remained in the forefront of this movement.
Women: Included those like Aruna Asaf Ali, Sucheta Kriplani and Usha Mehta.
Workers: They went on strikes and faced severe repression.
Peasants: They formed the heart of the movement. Some zamindars also participated. This time the peasants
were against the authority and there was complete absence of anti-zamindar violence.
8
Government Officials: Participation was huge especially from those belonging to lower levels in police and
administration. This completely eroded Government loyalty.
Muslims: They gave shelters to underground activists. No communal clashes were seen during the
movement.
Princely states: Response was mild.
Reaction from Various Ends:
Achyut Patwardhan, Ram Manohar Lohia, Jayaprakash Narayan, Sucheta Kriplani and Biju Patnaik
were the prominent leaders.
The British put down the movement with ruthless brutality and the Congress was banned.
The communists did not support the congress policy.
The Hindu Mahasabha also repudiated the Congress policy.
The Muslim League, too, called upon the Muslims to abstain from any participation in the movement.
Main Storm Centres of the movement were eastern UP, Bihar, Midnapur, Maharashtra and Karnataka.
Punjab and N.W.F.P were unusually quiet. The movement was relatively weak in Madras presidency,
except for scattered pockets like Guntur, coastal Andhra, Coimbatore and Ramnad. Among the big states,
Only Mysore was seriously affected.
In one sense the movement of 1942 marked the culmination of the Indian Freedom Movement.
The fire of this movement burnt all the talks of Dominion status into ashes, India now wanted nothing less
than complete independence.
By the end of 1942, the August Revolution thoroughly crushed 92,000 people arrested by 1943.
Bihar:
The most powerful movement as per recent studies was seen in Bihar.
Kisan Sabha did the preparatory work at Patna.
Students mobilized a rally at the secretariat and tried hoisting a flag at the assembly.
Masses burnt railway stations, municipal buildings, post offices, etc.
The local police seemed powerless and the army called on 12th August.
Jamshedpur
Strikes in Local constabulary. Also, 30,000 workers of TISCO participated in the strikes.
Dalmia Nagar labour strikes were evident.
Peasant Revolts broke out in every district.
Students and Zamindars and merchants also supported the movement by supplying funds.
Attacked and looted treasury buildings and Railway stations.
Killed unarmed European officers in Public.
Isolated police thanas were taken over and destroyed.
Participation from all castes including the lower caste were evident.
A Parallel Government set up at Barh by Gops & Dusadhs and announced their own Raj and levied
taxes.
9
Government Actions:
The government resorted to massive suppression and it was most brutal.
Bomb, Machine guns, Tear gas, Wartime emergency powers and Army 57 Battalion were used to
suppress the movement.
There were Military rule at various places.
More than 10000 died and the Government succeeded in suppressing the movement.
Thereafter no revolt till 1945 and created a political vacuum.
By the end of 1942 August Revolution was crushed and 93,000 arrested by 1943.
Opposition to the Movement
Muslim League:
They did not approve of the campaign.
Muslims stood aloof from the movement.
But this opposition was not universal and active.
There were no communal clashes.
B.R. Ambedkar:
He joined Viceroy’s executive council as a Labour member.
He did not support the movement.
There is evidence of Dalits participation and cross caste unity.
Hindu Mahasabha:
Condemned the movement and viewed it as ‘sterile, unjust and injurious to the Hindu cause’
o V.D. Savarkar, B.S. Munje, S.P. Mukherjee supported Britain war efforts, and RSS remained aloof
as well.
o N.C. Chatterjee supported the Quit India Movement and led to a vague official resolution.
CPI:
Soviet Russia joined in December 1941.
Supported the British against ‘People’s war’.
Despite this official stand many individual leaders joined the Quit India Movement.
Trade union and Kisan Sabhas controlled by communists.
Started losing their popularity.
Aftermath of the QIM – Congress drifted towards Constitutionalism
Lessons for British
1. Difficult to tackle such mass movement without wartime emergency powers.
2. Keeping India by force was a very costly affair and readiness for negotiation and Orderly withdrawal.
3. Importance of Congress grew among the masses and also in the larger political spectrum.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
MODERN HISTORY
Lecture – 42
Transfer of Power and INA
2
❖ In Nov 1943, he got Andaman Nicobar from the Japanese Army and renamed it to Shaheed and Swaraj
Dweep.
❖ In 1944, he addressed Gandhi as Father of Nation (first person to call him so) from Azad Hind Radio.
❖ In 1945, INA surrendered with the surrender of Japan.
❖ On Aug 18, 1945, Subash Chandra Bose died mysteriously in a plane crash in Taiwan.
❖ During the closing years of the war, Subhash Bose served to hold up the dropping spirits of the nationalists,
who were feeling helpless and frustrated.
❖ In 1942, he conveyed a conference in Tokyo to Indians living in Malay to Burma and formed the “Indian
Independence League” also known as Bangkok Conference. It elected Rash Behari as president and resolved
to raise the INA.
❖ Mohan Singh was chosen as commander of INA and Subash invited to lead INA.
❖ Also when Bose proclaimed the provisional Govt in 1943 he designated himself as Supreme Commander
of Indian National Army and also named himself as the head of the state, Prime minister and minister of war
and foreign affairs. He anticipated the position of Head of the state in Independent India. This according to
some scholars shows an authoritarian streak in Bose.
❖ In Bose’s opinion the political system of India should be a synthesis of Socialism and Fascism. He wanted
to incorporate the justice and equality of socialism with the discipline of Fascism.” He called this Samyavada.
❖ However Bose was not a Fascist. He stood firm for women empowerment, secularism and other liberal
ideas.
❖ Gandhi’s idea of state can be found in his book Hind Swaraj. He idealised his state as Ramrajya i.e utopia.
His state did not need any representative government, a constitution, army or police force. The idea of India
was modelled on the India of the past which is free of Capitalism, communism, exploitation and religious
violence. Gandhi’s Swaraj laid emphasis on self-government through individual and community
building.
❖ At individual level Gandhi’s swaraj was concerned with the capacity for dispassionate self-assessment,
ceaseless self-purification and growing self reliance.
❖ Gandhi was not in favour of the Party System. He believed that the representative government could not
provide justice. He advocated a stateless society.
❖ Gandhi was opposed to centralisation. He believed in decentralisation- both economic and political.
❖ He imagined the society as composed of a large number of Village Republics. He imagined the village as a
basic unit and the people living there always abiding by the ideas of truth and non-violence.
❖ His idea of a village republic was basically a self-sufficient Panchayat to be governed by a group of 5
people elected annually.
❖ Militarism: Bose was deeply attracted to militarism and military discipline while Gandhi’s Ramrajya
had no place for militarism. It was to be based on Truth and Non-Violence. According to Gandhi, the military
has to be used only in a limited manner and only for the Self-Defence.
❖ Gandhi wanted revival of ancient villages in which agriculture prospered and industry was
decentralised. He never favoured large scale industrialisation.
❖ Gandhi believed that the capitalists who had earned a lot of wealth must share it with the entire society and
spend it on the welfare of people.
❖ For Bose on the other hand, economic freedom was the essence of Social and Political freedom.
❖ He favoured modernisation through industrialisation. Bose was impressed by the success of the Soviet
Union and believed socialism to be the basis of national reconstruction.
❖ Bose categorised industry into Heavy, medium and cottage industry. Heavy industry was to form the
backbone of the national economy.
❖ Caste and Untouchability: Gandhi had mainly three goals for society:
➢ Eradicating untouchability.
➢ Maintaining the Varna System.
➢ Strengthening tolerance, modesty and religiosity.
6
❖ Gandhi found untouchability incompatible with swaraj and advocated for its eradication. He said that if
any Shastra propounded untouchability that shastra should be abandoned.
❖ However, Gandhi supported the Varna System. He believed that the laws of the caste were eternal and were
based on social harmony. He imagined each village of India to be divided into four Varna Systems with every
member of society doing his/her duty.
❖ Bose on the other hand wanted a socialist revolution that would bring about an end to the caste system.
In its place would come an egalitarian, casteless and classless society.
Women:
❖ Gandhi’s View: Gandhi not only brought women into the struggle for swaraj but also opposed various
social ills affecting women like Child Marriages, Dowry System, and Female infanticide and Treatment of
Widows.
❖ He declared men and women to be equal.
❖ However when it comes to roles of men and women Gandhi would be regarded as Patriarch and Traditional.
❖ In 1937 he wrote, “I do believe that women will not make a contribution to the world by mimicking or running
a race with men. She can run the race but she will not rise to great heights by mimicking the man. She has to
be the complement of man”
❖ Gandhi considered women to be the presiding deities of home. It was their dharma to take care of the home.
Gandhi said, “If women don’t follow their Dharma, People would be totally destroyed”.
❖ It is to be noted that Gandhi also said that Dharma did not imply brutish behaviour from men treating
women as a personal possession. Women should not tolerate ill-treatment from their husbands. But he didn’t
ask women to walk out of their homes and launch agitation against the abuse. He said that women should not
look at men for their protection. They must rely on their own strength.
❖ According to British historian Judith Brown Gandhi’s view on women does not represent the ‘Modern
women’ who aspire to be free- socially, economically and physically. She said that Gandhi preached the
female virtues of bravery and independence, and a capacity to bear suffering. The model he offered to Indian
women was a virtuous and faithful wife.
❖ Bose’s view: Bose considered women equal to men. This view is opposite to fascists and Nazis who
considered men as superior. In his Presidential address at the Maharashtra Provincial Conference in 1928 he
declared “The status of women should be raised and the women should be trained to take larger and more
intelligent roles. it is impossible for one half of the nation to win freedom without active participation of the
other half. ”
❖ In 1938, When he was Congress President (Haripura session), he formed a separate planning
commission for women. The commission was chaired by Rani Lakshmi Bai Rajawade.
❖ In 1943, he called women to serve in the INA and formed Rani Jhansi Regiment Commanded by Cpt Lakshmi
Swaminathan. They were neither discriminated against nor given special treatment as compared to men.
❖ Bose believed in Female emancipation. He wanted women to get all-round education which includes not
only literacy but also physical and vocational training.
7
Education:
❖ Gandhi opposed the English system of education and use of English as a medium of instruction. He
advocated free and compulsory education for all boys and girls b/w 7-14 years of age in Vernacular.
❖ Gandhi’s concept of education was not merely imparting literacy. It took a holistic approach covering
physical training, imparting moral principles and personality development.
❖ According to Gandhi, “Literacy in itself is no education”.
❖ Gandhi believed that the purpose of education is not just to make a career and achieve social status. For
him education was a means to enlightenment. He wanted to incorporate Hindu Literature in the education
system as they inculcate discipline and self-restraint.
❖ He conceived the idea of Nai Talim in 1937. Its aim was to impart education which would lead to freedom
from ignorance, illiteracy, superstitions, etc The aim was holistic training of mind and body. Along with
academics, Nai Talim included manual labour, Handicrafts, art and drawing.
❖ Gandhi imagined self-sufficient villages. So wanted the education system to increase the efficiency of
students to take up tasks in those villages in order to make it self sufficient.
Bose’s View:
❖ Bose advocated higher education especially in technical and scientific fields as he visualised an Industrial
India.
❖ He said, “National Reconstruction is possible only with the aid of science and our scientists”.
❖ He wanted Indian students to be sent abroad so that when they return they can take up the task of
Industrialisation of India.
INA Surrender:-
❖ 20000 soldiers interrogated & sent back to India.
Classification
❖ White
➢ Persuaded to misled.
❖ Greys
➢ Released or rehabilitated in Army.
❖ Blacks
➢ To be court martialed.
➢ 10 trials took place.
❖ On 5th Nov 1st trial continued for 2 months.
❖ Mass upheaval took place on this day.
❖ All political parties including Muslim league demanded release.
❖ Communal harmony started then after.
❖ Protest meetings – INA easily got funded and closed shop Violence which led to riots (exp. Calcutta)
❖ American & British establishments attacked.
❖ Students and tax drivers and tramway labourers participated.
8
❖ It was Similar in Karachi, Patna, Bombay all over. But revenue happened.
❖ Press censorship lifted – INA campaign reached public
❖ Demand for release took place.
❖ Congress leaders just released took the cause and became part of election campaign
❖ Subhash – martyred patriot, Political mobilisation
❖ The 1945 AICC meeting decided to define misguided patriots. Defence committee was formed.
INA Surrender:
❖ On 3 Jan 1946 – CIC remitted their sentence and set them free.All three came out of led fall as
heroes..Celebrated.Hear dissension in army and country.
❖ Another Trial – Captain Abdur Rashid Wanted Muslim League to defend him and not Congres Sentenced to 7
year rigorous punishment Sparked agitation in Calcutta again and other parts of the country.
❖ Even the members of armed forces supported the movement and attended meetings demanding release of
prisoners.
❖ Gandhiji called him as “Prince among patriots”
❖ Three major struggles took place in the winter of 1945-46 which changed the course of India’s freedom
struggle. These were:
➢ Nov, 1945 : In calcutta over INA trials.
➢ Feb, 1946 : In calcutta against seven year sentence to INA officer Rashid Ali.
➢ Feb, 1946 : Royal Indian Navy (RIN) mutiny in Bombay
INA Trials:
❖ Use of Indian troops in Indonesia, demanding their withdrawal.
❖ The rebellious ratings hoisted the tricolour, crescent and the hammer and sickle flags on the mast of the rebel
fleet. The strike call in Bombay was given by CPI and was supported by the congress socialists like Aruna
Asaf Ali and Achyut patwardhan. Both congress and league opposed. It was largely due to the efforts of
Vallabhbhai patel (and Jinnah) that the ratings surrendered.
❖ This was not much supported by Gandhiji and Muslim league
❖ The revolt of the Indian Naval ratings at Bombay, widespread discontent and strikes in the Indian Air Force, a
strike by the Indian signal corps at Jabalpur, had all proved that the nation was no longer in a mood to be
satisfied with vague promises.
❖ Sympathetic military strikes were organised in Karachi, Madras, Visakhapatnam, Calcutta, Delhi, Cochin,
Jamnagar, Andaman, Bahrain and Aden.
❖ However the movement was short-lived. Maratha battalion from bombay was called in. The ratings were
rounded up and the normalcy was restored.
❖ Note: RIN mutiny remained confined only to the urban centres while INA agitation reached the remotest
village.
❖ The official enquiry revealed that “majority of rating were politically concious”+influenced by INA.
❖ It was seen as the last nail in the coffin - marking the end of British imperialism in India.
❖ These uprisings compelled the British to give some concessions which included:
➢ The Government announced that only those INA members accused of murder or brutal treatment of fellow
prisoners would be brought to trial.
➢ Imprisonment sentences passed against the first batch were remitted in jan 1947.
➢ Decision was taken to send a cabinet mission to India
❖ Communal unity was witnessed during the movement. Muslim ratings went to the league and rest to congress
and socialists to seek advice.
❖ These upsurges were in the nature of direct and violent conflict with the authority. Thus only more militant
sections could participate.
Why the Congress and the Nationalist leaders did not extended their support to the uprisings?
❖ These uprisings could have gone out of control.
❖ Disciplined armed forces were vital in free India. Congress and Gandhi did not want to set any bad precedent
on which future mutiny in armed forces could be justified.
❖ It is also claimed that had the congress leader surrendered to the power play, a different path to the power play
could have emerged.
❖ These uprisings were significantly different from earlier national movements. They were violent and directly
challenged the authority while earlier movements were peaceful.
❖ Negotiation was an integral part of congress strategy, especially when Britishers were about to leave.
Solution A:
❖ Tebhaga means in 3 parts in 1946 the sharecroppers of Bengal began to assert that they would no longer pay a
half share of their crops to Jotedars but only 1/3rd and that before division.
❖ The crop would be stored in their khamars (Godowns) and not that of the Jotedars.
Muslim League:
❖ It lost to communalism.
❖ It Propagating “Two nation theory”
❖ It became strong during WWII.
❖ The Muslim base grew a lot.
❖ During 1946 elections- >85% votes of muslims.
Transfer of Power:
❖ In 1944 CR FORMULA Gandhi Jinnah spoke.
❖ In 1945 Desai Liaquat pact and Wavell Plan at Shimla conference.
11
❖ Defence of India was to be in the hands of a British authority till Power was transferred.
❖ The executive would work within the existing constitution, but the door would be kept open for discussion on
a new constitution once the war had been finally won.
Plan failed!
❖ Muslim league declared that only the league will speak for Indian Mislims and demanded a communal veto by
the league.
❖ Change in British Attitude towards India The attitude of the British government towards the Indian
national movement underwent a significant change after World War II. In General elections held in
England, Churchill’s conservative party was defeated and the Labour party came into power in England with
Attlee as the new prime minister. Nazi Germany had been destroyed, Japan surrendered after Hiroshima in
August 1945, and a tremendous anti-imperialist wave was sweeping through South-East Asia. The destructive
results of the War rendered England very weak from economic and military points of view. In this context,
Wavell announced general elections in the winter of 1945-46, for the last elections had been held in 1934 for
the centre and Abhishek in 1937 for the provinces. Unlike in 1937, now the league clearly established itself as
the dominant party among Muslims. The decisive shift in British policy really came about under mass pressure
13
in the autumn and winter of 1945-46. The INA release movement and R.I.N. Mutiny had made it crystal clear
that the Indian masses were not ready to bear quietly the unjust policies of the British government any more.
1946:
❖ In July the Labour Party came to power and Clement Attlee became PM, Pethick Lawrence became secretary
of state.
❖ In Aug Central and provincial elections were announced.
❖ In September: it was announced that the constituent assembly would be formed and the govt is working as per
Cripps' offer.
Election results:
Congress:
❖ Congress got 91% non muslim votes.
❖ Congress got 57/102 seats in central assembly
Provincial elections:
❖ majority in most provinces including NWFP and Assam except Bengal, Sindh and Punjab
Muslim League:
❖ Muslim League got 86.6 % muslim votes.
❖ Muslim League got 30 reserved seats in Central assembly
Provincial elections:
❖ Majority in Bengal and Sindh.
❖ In Punjab: Unionist-Congress- Akali coalition under Khizr hayat Khan assumed
❖ Power. This Franchise got 10% seats in provincial and 1% in central election.
Significance of election:
❖ INC emerged as the largest party.
❖ Muslim League won all muslim constituencies.
❖ The League had united muslim votes and established a bargaining power for a separate homeland in the last
general election in British India.
❖ In this context, Wavell announced general elections in the winter of 1945-46, for the last elections had been
held in 1934 for the centre and in 1937 for the provinces.
❖ Unlike in 1937, now the league clearly established itself as the dominant party among Muslims.
❖ The decisive shift in British policy really came about under mass pressure in the autumn and winter of 1945-
46. The INA release movement and R.I.N. Mutiny had made it crystal clear that the Indian masses were not
ready to quietly bear the unjust policies of the British government any more.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
MODERN HISTORY
Lecture – 43
Freedom and
Communalism
2
❖ The League had united Muslim votes and established a bargaining power for a separate homeland.
❖ It was the last general election in British India.
❖ Economic and Administrative problems could have arised. For e.g., Problem of communication between
western and eastern Pakistan.
❖ Division of armed forces could have been dangerous.
Congress Muslim League
❖ Accepted election and constituent assembly. ❖ Accepted 6th June 1946.
❖ Rejected formation of interim government. ❖ Wished to form an interim government.
❖ Accepted 24th June 1946. ❖ Was not called.
❖ Nehru’s statement over grouping ❖ So it rejected the plan.
❖ 12 Aug 1946 at Wavells call to form an interim ❖ Later was called to join
government. ❖ Refused to participate in constituent assembly.
❖ Call for Direct Action from Aug 16.
Direct Action:
❖ It was started from 16 August 1946.
❖ It was called by Muslim League.
❖ Communal riots spread especially in Calcutta, Noakhali, Bihar and Garhmukteshwar and nearly 5000
were dead.
Why did congress agree to dominion status despite its Purna Swaraj resolution way back in 1929?
❖ To ensure a peaceful and quick transfer of power.
❖ Congress considered it more important to assume authority asap in order to check spreading communal
tensions.
❖ It would have ensured the continuity of bureaucracy and army which was the need of the time.
Plan Balkan:
❖ Between March - May 1947, Mountbatten envisaged a plan for power transfer.
❖ According to this, power was to be transferred to the separate provinces or to a confederation (if formed before
the power transfer).
❖ The various units thus formed would have the option to join India or Pakistan or remain independent. The plan
was abandoned after Nehru reacted violently to it.
❖ The name Balkan because the plan would have broken India into numerous independent nations as seen in the
Balkan region.
❖ On July 18, 1947, the British parliament ratified the Mountbatten Plan as the “Independence of India Act,
1947”. The Act was implemented on August 15, 1947. Power was handed over through meticulously planned
rituals and ceremonies.
❖ Pakistan became independent on 14 August. That night the Indian constituent Assembly met in a special
session, where at the stroke of midnight Nehru delivered his now famous “Tryst with Destiny” Speech. When
the rest of the world was fast asleep, India awoke to life and freedom.
India:
❖ Finally, India got freedom on 15 August 1947.
❖ Lord Mountbatten was requested to continue as Governor General and continued till 1948.
❖ Later, Lord Mountbatten was succeeded by C. Rajagopalachari (1948 – 1950).
❖ Finally, the enactment of the Constitution took place on 26th January 1950.
Pakistan:
❖ They got freedom on 14 August, 1947.
❖ M.A. Jinnah became Governor General of Pakistan.
❖ It remained as a dominion till 1956.
Boundary Commission:
❖ Two Boundary commission under Sir Cyril Radcliffe was formed:
➢ Bengal
➢ Punjab
❖ Time frame to outline the boundary was less than 6 weeks
communal interests to further their own economic interests—communalism was a bourgeois question par
excellence.
❖ Communalism was in the form of Nationalist Communalism till 1920.
It stood for common and collective interests. Although its social identity rested on adherence to a particular
religion, communalism was not incompatible with nationalism. Its proponents stressed that though the interests
of different religious groups may be divergent, these interests do not clash.
❖ Thus, it worked within the broader framework of nationalism – the Muslims were hence nationalist Muslims
and Hindus were nationalist Hindus.
❖ Fascism
➢ It is a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often races above the individual
and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic
and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.
❖ From 1920 to 1937 was the phase of Liberal Communalism. The ideology of liberal communalists was that
there were exclusive communal interests which would clash at times, however, these exclusive interests
could be gradually harmonized to work towards a single nation, that is there was a need for accommodating
interests of groups.
❖ The idea of safeguarding interests of different communities, can be related to demands for representation,
reservation etc. by different communal groups. These demands were an important component of communal
politics in this period, still the communal politics did not transcend the confines of India.
❖ Extremist Communalism characterized the period 1937-1947. It had a fascist character and exhibited
aggressive syndrome.
➢ Extremist Communalism was not just an ideology, it acquired the character of a mass movement by
developing mass-base. It proposed that divergent and exclusive communal interests cannot be
harominzed.
➢ Thus, Extremism was anti-coexistence and had elements like fear, hatred, animosity, insecurity and
conflict. Insecurity and antagonism predominated the communalists of this phase.
➢ There was direct confrontation between different communities and communal riots broke out in different
parts of the country.
Timelines of various events that led to Communalism in India during the British Rule:
❖ Wahhabism and revolt of 1857
➢ It was led by the Muslims against the British.
➢ WW Hunter wrote a book named “The Indian Mussalmans”.
➢ Sir Syed Ahmed Khan played a significant role in shifting the goal of Nationalism to communalism. Soon
after, the Britishers went away from the Hindus and developed a close relationship with the Indian
Muslims.
➢ Communalism in approach towards Indian History started with all these events.
❖ Religious reform movements such as Arya Samaj also contributed towards communalism.
❖ New Hero Myths and Communal overtones began, for e.g., Ganapati festivals of Tilak.
12
Hindu Mahasabha
❖ In 1910, the All India Hindu Mahasabha was formed at Allahabad (Leading Hindu).
❖ In 1911- Punjab Hindu Mahasabha organised Hindu conference at Amritsar.
13
❖ Headquarter was set up at Haridwar and organised Akhil Bharatiya Hindu conference at Haridwar on Hindu
fairs. [Not much relevance initially]
❖ In 1915 the First session under the Maharaja of Kasimbazar took place.
❖ In 1922 the Moplah revolt broke out.
❖ Hindu Mahasabha under Madan Mohan Malviya had the objective of Self-defence and fight against
proselytizing. Started the Sangathan and Shuddhi movement to counter the Muslim League’s Tanzeem and
Tabligh.
❖ Savarkar articulated the term "Hindutva”. However, the term was originally coined by Chandranath Basu
1892 in his book "Hindutva-Hindu Prakrit Itihas".
❖ In 1939, V.D. Savarkar (Chairman) succeeded by S.P. Mukherjee, he had a more Nationalist outlook.
MA Jinnah:
❖ The credit for partition should be given to him.
❖ He was a shrewd politician and dominated
❖ He ropes from strength to strength.
❖ He got the epithet of Quaid-e-Azam (Great organiser).
Jawaharlal Nehru:
❖ He blames the delay of growth of the strong Muslim middle class.
❖ Psychology of fear- “Islam in danger” played a significant role to foment the communal issues.
❖ The series of events gave a ripe situation to Muslim League and Jinnah became their Messiah.
❖ The Act of Hindu Mahasabha also played a crucial role in this. Their view was to build India as a Hindu nation
with Muslims as Minority community.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture – 44
Impact of
Socialism
2
Impact of Socialism
Socialism:
Social and economic doctrine that calls for public instead of private ownership or control of property and
natural resources.
According to the socialist view, individuals do not live or work in isolation but live in cooperation with one
another.
Everything that people produce is in some sense a social product, and everyone who contributes to the
production of a good is entitled to a share in it. Society as a whole, therefore, should own or at least control
property for the benefit of all its members.
As per socialists, true freedom and true equality require social control of the resources that provide the basis
for prosperity in any society.
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels made this point in the Manifesto of the Communist Party (1848) when
they proclaimed that in a socialist society “the condition for the free development of each is the free
development of all.”
Features of socialism
Aim to establish a society consisting of complete social and economic equality.
Root out capitalist system by proletariat system.
Without capitalism there is no birth of socialism.
Replaces private ownership with public ownership of means of production.
In Socialist society increase in production should be reflected in the increase in more personal belonging to
everyone not just few people.
Terminate the exploitation of one class by another and create equality.
The equality of socialism includes political, social and economic.
Advocates separation of religion with politics. People can have faith but cannot bring it to the public or
cannot use it in politics.
Ensures basic social rights.
Equality to all genders.
Social benefits to society at minimal cost.
Vision of socialist society seen with respect to downtrodden rather than kings and rulers.
3
Democratic Socialism
The economy is socialist i.e., production and wealth are generally collectively owned but the government is
democratic.
It is opposed to authoritarian forms of governance, and believes that the government should provide basic
needs to all of a country's citizens, such as healthcare and education, for free or at a reduced cost.
Gandhi’s idea of Sarvodaya society was built upon the rock basis of
economic equality. However, unlike Marx, he did not believe in coercion or
application of force; rather, people and rich landowners would voluntarily come
forward to offer or share the surplus land with the needy.
Karl Marx was a conflict theorist, who believed that society was characterized by
two groups or classes, that is, the ‘Haves’ and the ‘Have-Nots’. Whereas Gandhi
proposed the treatment of all forms of work and all types of employees and
workers as equal and important.
Gandhi was a spiritualist. Marx, on the other hand, considered religion as “the
opium of the masses”. He viewed religion as a social evil that needed to be done
away with. To him, religion prevented people from claiming their rights and climbing higher up the social
ladder as they accepted their situation to be preordained and as their ultimate fate.
The Left
The left on the other hand is keener to reduce the gaps in society between the rich and the poor.
They believe society should work together to help everybody, with schemes like the NHS and Benefits.
They argue the rich should pay for this through taxes, thus reducing the gap between rich and poor.
To do this, economically, they need to raise taxes. They also prefer to regulate 'the Market’, which
means distri
buting the wealth created on the stock market and in banks so that it does not all end up in the pockets of
millionaires but some of it goes to the country's problems.
The Right
On a social level, the right generally believes that a hierarchy in society is natural and normal. For
them, the idea of a class system whereby the richer employ the poorer in a triangle is healthy because
everybody benefits and it has historically been the natural order of things.
Their economic policy complements this, by promoting a form of capitalis m which gives more
economic freedom to big businesses. This means fewer regulations and lower taxes. They argue that as
big businesses grow, they create jobs for the working class and gradually everyone gets richer.
Nothing is obtained by working more than what is required. Communism frequently results in low
production, mass poverty and limited advancement. Poverty spread so widely in the Soviet Union in the
1980s that its citizens revolted.
On a social level, the right generally believes that a hierarchy in society is natural and normal. For them, the
idea of a class system whereby the richer employ the poorer in a triangle is healthy because everybody
benefits and it has historically been the natural order of things.
Their economic policy complements this, by promoting a form of capitalism which gives more economic
freedom to big businesses. This means fewer regulations and lower taxes. They argue that as big businesses
grow, they create jobs for the working class and gradually everyone gets richer.
Marxism Vs Communism
Marxism is the political and economic theories of Karl Marx and Friedrich.
Marxism is the theory and Communism is the practical implementation of Marxism.
Communism is the realization of a Stateless society where all are equal and Marxism is the framework by
which such a state is developed.
Marxism is a political ideology based on Karl Marx’s ideas, communism can be called as a political system,
which is based on Marxist ideology.
The Marxist ideology is to prepare the society for communism.
The main difference between communism and Marxism is that communism is an ideology that is based on
common ownership while the absence of social classes, money, and the states, while Marxism is an ideology
by Karl Marx that is a social, political, and fiscal theory by him, that focuses on struggles between capitalists
and working class.
Communism:
It is a philosophical, social, political, and economic ideology and movement whose goal is the establishment
of a communist society, namely a socio-economic order structured upon the ideas of common or social
ownership of all property and the absence of social classes, money, and the state.
It is inspired from the ideas of two German political philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels known as
“Communist Manifesto”.
6
Marxism:
Marxism is a social, political, and economic philosophy named after Karl Marx. It examines the effect of
capitalism on labour, productivity, and economic development and argues for a worker revolution to
overturn capitalism in favour of communism.
Russian Revolution:
The Russian Revolution was a pair of revolutions in Russia in 1917 which dismantled the Tsarist autocracy
and led to the rise of the Soviet Union.
The Russian Empire collapsed with the abdication of Emperor Nicholas II and the old regime was replaced
by a provisional government during the first revolution of February 1917. Alongside it arose grassroots
community assemblies (called 'soviets') which contended for authority.
In the second revolution that October, the Provisional Government was toppled and all power was given to
the soviets.
The Left movements in India developed in two main streams:
⮚ Communism which functioned as a branch of the International Communist Movement and was by and
large controlled by the Comintern.
⮚ Socialism: The Congress Socialist Party which functioned as the left wing of the Indian National
Congress drawing inspiration from the philosophy of Democratic Socialism.
⮚ Both these movements drew support from the anti-imperialist sentiments prevalent in India.
Factors leading to rise of left in India:
Aftermath of WWI
Prices went high but not wages nor was there any legislation to raise their wages this led to unrest in
workers. Workers extended their role to the political arena. Strikes organized by workers against the
Rowlatt Act. In 1920 All India Trade Union Congress was held at Bombay.
Marxist Ideas and Russian Revolution
The Industrial revolution which led to the leftist movement following the ideology of Marx and the
Russian revolution on the lines of socialism inspired the various leaders of India.
Third Communist international (Comintern) (founded 1919)
Formed by the Soviet Union at international level, it aims to catalyse communist movements around the
globe.
Power of trade Union
Industrial development at various places led to the concentration of a large workforce and demand for
better working conditions and better wages.
Gandhi and Mass Mobilisation.
The 1929 depression.
7
Rise of Communism:
1920: The Communist Party of India (CPI) was formed in Tashkent by M.N. Roy, Abani Mukherjee after
the second congress of Comintern. M.N. Roy was the first to be elected to the leadership of Comintern.
1924: Many Communist leaders like S.A. Dange, Muzaffar Ahmed, Shaukat Usmani, Nalini Gupta were
jailed in the Kanpur Bolshevik Conspiracy Case.
1925: The Indian Communist Conference at Kanpur, formalizes the formation of CPI.
8
Peasants’ Agitation:
In United Provinces, peasant agitation were for:
Revision of Tenancy Laws
Lower Rents
Protection against Eviction
Relief from Indebtedness
In Gujarat the Bardoli Satyagraha was led by Sardar Patel.
Similar Peasant agitation took place in Rampa region of Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan and in Ryotwari areas of
Bombay and Madras.
Trade Unionism:
All India Trade union congress (AITUC) was formed in 1920. Lala Lajpat Rai became its 1st President and
Dewan Chamanlal its 1st General secretary. Tilak was also associated. The major strikes during the 1920s
included:
Kharagpur Railway Workshop Strike.
Strike in Tata Iron and steel works in Jamshedpur.
Bombay Textile Mills Strike.
Buckingham Carnatic Mills strikes.
In 1923, the first May Day was celebrated in India in Madras.
Then he went to Russia and formed a favorable impression of Communists leader Vladimir Lenin, met
Joseph Stalin and became a part of the Communist International.
1920: He attended the Second Congress of the Communist International.
Differences on the policies' views, Lenin and Roy work together on the common objectives of providing
support to bourgeois nationalists.
By 1926, he was serving the policy-making bodies of the Communist International and in 1927, he visited
China.
Roy’s mission to make the Chinese Communist Party implement guidelines by the Communist
International failed. Following this, he was expelled from the Communist International in September
1929.
To prepare yeast for revolution he travelled to Tashkent and established a military school for tribes living on
Indian borders and also formed Communist party of India.
Anguished by British attitude towards Turkey’s Sultan, Muslim Mujahris joined Roy’s school while
returning caught in Peshawar and sentenced to harsh imprisonment including Mian Mohammad Akbar
Shah and Gawhar Rahman Khan. This incident is known as “Peshawar Conspiracy”.
In 1922, he Published Vanguard. He also organized a strong group of “Royists”.
In 1940 he founded the Radical democratic Party after disillusionment with Marxism.
Roy was editing a new weekly named ‘Independent India the Marxian Way’.
Early Communist Group:
Virendra Chattopadhyay, Bhupendra Dutt and Barkatullah mostly worked outside India and later turned
into Marxist.
Shripad Amrit Dange, supporter of Non-Cooperation, later turned to communism. In 1921 published
“Gandhi Vs Lenin” (tend towards Lenin). In 1922 founded “Socialist” (the first socialist weekly
magazine in India). In 1924 founded the Indian Socialist Labour Party of the Indian National Congress.
Singaravelu Chettier formed the “Labour Kisan Party of Hindustan” in 1923 and founded “Labour
Kisan Gazette”.
On 1 st September 1924, Satyabhakta in a press note released immediately after the conclusion of the
Kanpur Conspiracy trial announced that he had formed the C.P.I. with himself as the Secretary.
1925: The Indian Communist Conference at Kanpur, formalizes the formation of CPI. Conference included a
central committee of the party with SV Ghate and JP Bergarhatta as Joint Secretaries. British communists
took part to organize the Indian Communist Movement.
1930: CPI was formally affiliated to the Communist International.
The history of the Communist movement can be traced to five distinct phases:
⮚ The movement picked up after the Communist Party of Great Britain took upon itself to supervise
and energize the movement in India. One of its leaders, Philip Spratt arrived in India in December
1926 and organized a number of unions, edited newspapers and launched some youth and front
organizations.
⮚ Workers’ and Peasants’ parties were organized in Bengal, Bombay, the Punjab and the U.P.
⮚ In December 1928 the All India Workers and Peasants’ Party came into existence.
⮚ During 1928-29 the Communist Party organized a series of industrial strikes at Bombay,
culminating in the Girni Kamgar Union.
The magazine was published by Muzaffar Ahmed to propagate his ideas “Navyug”.
The first organization of Indian National Congress consists of peasants and workers.
Peshawar Conspiracy Trial Anguished by British attitude towards Turkey’s Sultan, Muslim Mujahris
(1922 – 33) joined Roy’s school while returning caught in Peshawar and sentenced to
harsh imprisonment including Mian Mohammad Akbar Shah and Gawhar
Rahman Khan.
Kanpur Conspiracy (1924) Government initiated a conspiracy case against four leading communist
Muzaffar Ahmad, Dange, Shaukat Usmani and Nalini Gupta. Charge on them
was “to deprive the King Emperor of his sovereignty of British India, by
complete separation of India from imperialistic Britain by a violent
12
revolution.”
⮚ It attacked the petty-bourgeois-nationalist leadership of Gandhiji and charged him with acting as the
tool of imperialism and thereby betraying the revolutionary struggle of the masses.
⮚ It even denounced the Congress Left wing as a counter-revolutionary force and an obstacle to the
victory of Indian nationalism.
⮚ This tactical approach proved to be totally unrealistic and the Communists found themselves thrown
adrift from the political mainstream.
Bourgeoisie: the middle class, typically with reference to its perceived materialistic values or conventional
attitudes.
⮚ Dutt-Bradley labeled the Indian National Congress as merely the united front of the Indian people in
the nationalist struggle.
⮚ They advised the Communists to join the Indian National Congress, utilize its solid party
organization, strengthen the left-wing within the Congress (C.S.P.) and oust the reactionary right-
wing elements.
⮚ The Communists, the CSP and the Trade Unionists planned to organize a Front Populaire on the
basis of a common minimum programme. The Communist leadership failed to take advantage of the
favourable circumstances or broaden the social base of their movement and the popular front never
came into existence.
⮚ All the same, profiting from the tide of rising mass upsurge and quickening all-round political
activity in the latter half of the 1930’s, the Communists emerged from their political quarantine and
found again a place among the radical elements in politics.
Dutt-Bradley Thesis
1935: In 7th Congress of Comintern communist changed their stance from sectarian politics to participation in
bourgeois led movement in colonial countries by organizing a popular front with all countries who are against
facism.
The theoretical basis of this change is credited to Dutt-Bradley Thesis which stated that “Congress could play a
great part in the work of realizing the anti-imperialist people’s front”.
Communist called their members to strengthen the left wing of congress and oust right wing.
14
4. Fourth Phase: The Second World War and the Communist Somersault
⮚ With the outbreak of the Second World War the Indian Communists, under advice from the
Comintern leaders, continued their United Front Policy against all types of Imperialism (including
Fascism and Nazism).
⮚ Rather the Communists scored a point over the Indian National Congress with the latter’s initial
vacillation and pro-British attitude of leaders like Gandhiji.
⮚ By September 15, 1939 the Congress too described the war as an imperialist war.
⮚ The Indian Communists, however, found themselves in a very awkward position when in June 1941
Hitler attacked the Soviet Union, the Fatherland of Socialism.
⮚ The Communists in India staged a right-about turn and relabeled the war as a ‘people’s war’ and
announced full support for the Allied-Russian war effort.
⮚ The Government of India awarded the CPI by declaring it a legal organization in 1942. The
Communists extended all possible support and even acted as British “spies” in suppressing the
popular revolt of 1942.
⮚ This sudden shift in the Communist policy evoked strong condemnation in nationalist circles and
clearly demonstrated that the CPI’s policy decisions were dictated by outside and international wire-
pullers.
5. Fifth Phase: The Transfer of Power Negotiations and Communists’ Multi-National Plan
⮚ During the period the CPI’s posture was pro-Muslim; it sought to further widen Congress-League
alienation and encourage all separatist elements and work for the division of Indian into a number of
sovereign states.
⮚ Its strategy was to tighten control over at least one such state and to make it as a base for the
liberation of the rest of India.
⮚ However, the Muslim league spurned the idea of an alliance with the Communists. The CPI,
therefore, stood as a discredited organization.
⮚ In 1942 the CPI adopted a resolution declaring India to be a multinational state and identifying as
many as 16 Indian “nation”.
15
⮚ In 1946 they put forward before the Cabinet Mission a plan for division of India into 17 separate
sovereign states on the model of the Balkans or the U.S.S.R. By 1947 the Communist movement in
India had lost whatever place it had in Indian politics and the CPI was in complete disarray.
⮚ When national emancipation from British imperialism was the dominant instinct of the people, the
CPI’s extra-national loyalties and exclusive dependence on European models made it a suspect
organization.
⮚ In fact, the Communists’ concept of Proletarian Internationalism could not be reconciled with India’s
national aspirations. Further, Marxism’s basic articles of faith in ‘class antagonism’ and ‘violence’
are alien to Indian tradition.
⮚ However, Marxist-Leninist philosophy, shorn of its extra-national loyalties, has some relevance to
independent India. The yawning gap between the rich and the poor and the underdeveloped condition
of the Indian economy are favorable climatic conditions in which Marxist-Socialism can take root in
India and serve as the beacon-light for the downtrodden masses.
Subhash Chandra Bose explained that the Congress Leftists were not only anti-imperialists but they also
desired reconstruction of national life on a socialist basis.
For the achievements of their goals, they had to fight at two fronts:
fight foreign imperialism
fight the rightists who were ready to deal with imperialism
In other words, they stood for complete independence and Socialism; they wanted Swaraj not for the classes
but for the masses.
The Right wing of the Congress called Congress Socialists as ‘internationalists’ and thus undependable for
the struggle for national liberation.
The Communists branded the Congress Socialists as Social Fascists and ‘fake socialists.’
The Congress Socialists hit back by describing the Indian Communists as ‘satellites of the U.S.S.R., as
‘social-chauvinists’ and charged them ‘with betraying socialism and distorting Marxian dialectics.’
The CSP disagreed with the Congress offer of conditional help for British war effort as it maintained that the
war was a conflict between the partners of imperialism for repartition of the world. The Congress socialists
wanted the Congress to wage a revolutionary mass struggle for independence. They supported the Quit India
Movement and took a leading part in organizing the quit India Movement, 1942.
The CSP was not in favour of a negotiated settlement for the transfer of power but advocated the need for a
revolutionary struggle to destroy edifices of imperialism, feudalism and communalism in India.
The Congress Socialists described the Muslim League ‘in league with Britain’ and Jinnah as a traitor and
tool of the imperia lists. They hoped for Hindu-Muslim unity not on the basis of temporary pacts or
agreements but “laying emphasis on the economic issues which equally affected the Hindu and Muslim
masses of the country”.
The CSP described the Partition of India as an act of surrender by the Congress leadership.
The Forward Bloc (1939) SC Bose after resigning from presidentship of the Congress. Bose
opposed the policy of Gandhi and went abroad to seek military help
to fight the British in India.
Revolutionary Socialist Party (1940) It is a regional communist party in Kerala and West Bengal.
The party was founded on 19 March 1940 by Tridib Chaudhuri and
has its roots in the Bengali liberation movement, Anushilan Samiti
and the Hindustan Socialist Republican Army.
Revolutionary Communist Party The party was founded as the Communist League by
(1942) Saumyendranath Tagore in 1934, breaking away from the
Communist Party of India.
RCPI led armed uprisings after the independence of India, but later
shifted to parliamentary politics.
Bolshevik-Leninist Party of India Bolshevik–Leninist Party of India, Ceylon and Burma was a
(1942) revolutionary Trotskyist (political ideology and branch of Marxism
developed by Ukrainian-Russian revolutionary Leon Trotsky) party
which campaigned for independence and socialism in South Asia.
The party was formed in 1942 as a unification of two Indian
groups, with the Lanka Sama Samaja Party of Ceylon.
Leftist Camps
The followers of Nehru and Bose generated leftist camps in congress. Discussion on socio-eco justice
attracted youth workers.
Many organizations came forward like Youth League, The Hindustani Seva Dal, The Naujawan Bharat
Sabha, Volunteers Movement and participation of All India Trade Union Congress.
Meanwhile in India at that time debate was going on Swaraj, congress deciphered this as Dominion
Status for India within the sphere of Britishers while according to Nehru it only meant another way of
exploitation by Britishers.
In 1928 All party Conference while declaring the inclusion of Dominion status in the constitution of
India was discussing Nehru and Bose built opposition and gained support for Purna Swaraj and
Complete Independence.
In 1929 President of Lahore Session and delivered a speech which stated that “I am a socialist and a
republican and no believer in kings and princes”. Supported the existence and influence of “Praja
Mandal Movement”.
Literary work in support of Socialism: “Glimpse of World History” in 1934 and “An Autobiography” in
1936.
Advertised the thought that political freedom was meaningless without economic freedom.
Nehru’s Socialism
His socialism was evolutionary, not revolutionary, and it was inclusive, not based on class.
It was democratic and comfortable with heterogeneity.
Egalitarian without leveling, committed to welfare and affirmative action.
Co-operative to contain destructive competition, oriented to rational planning to overcome anarchic
individualism.
Stressed the need for the government to lead through an advanced public sector, valued local democracy and
local management of utilities.
He was attracted to Marxism as a means to historical explanation, but he found it irrelevant to programmes
for progress and even for socialism.
21
Among Indian big business, by the 1920s, two major groupings had emerged, neither fundamentally
antagonistic to the other but pursuing different policies.
The first, led by the Tatas and containing such major forces as the Bombay Millowners' Association, was
openly loyal to the British. The second, headed by Birla and containing the various Indian Chambers of
Commerce (formed later into the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry) gave support to
the Right wing of the Congress leadership - at times decisively pressing it toward a deal.
Though neither of the two schools was prepared for an anti-imperialist struggle , they pursued different
strategies in heading it off. Of the two strategies, that of the Birla group was certainly more sophisticated,
and eventually persuaded most of the proponents of the group headed by Tata. Sir Purshottamdas Thakurdas,
22
probably the biggest cotton trader in India, was in a sense a bridge between the two schools - a director of
many Tata firms as well as of many foreign-owned ones (such as Killick Nixon), he was also Birla's closest
confidante.
A few days after the Lucknow Congress A.D.Shroff of Tatas fired off a refutation of Nehru's speech. Three
weeks later, on May 18, 1936, 21 leading Bombay businessmen issued what came to be known as the
"Bombay Manifesto" - against Nehru. Among the signatories were Sir N.Saklatvala, Sir Purshottamdas
Thakurdas, Sir Chimanlal Setalvad, Sir Pheroze Sethna, Sir Cowasji Jehangir, Walchand Hirachand,
Dharamsey Khatau and A.D.Shroff. It began with a quotation from the Lucknow address which advocated
socialism for India, and which gave Russia as an example of the sort of civilisation India should work for.
The signatories then stated:
"We have no hesitation in declaring that we are unequivocally opposed to ideas of this kind being
propagated, as in the present condition of widespread economic misery in the country, they are likely to
find a ready though unthinking reception. We are convinced that there is a grave risk of the masses
being misled by such doctrines into believing that all that is required for the improvement of their well-
being is a total destruction of the present social and economic structure. The inculcation of such ideas
into the minds of unthinking millions of this country would lead to a situation in which not only the
institution of private property but the peaceful observation of religion, and even personal safety, would
be jeopardised."
SC Bose and Socialism:
He rejected the offer to join Civil Services in 1921.
Deshbandhu Chittaranjan Das had been his political mentor.
Deshbandhu who declared that India should attain “swaraj of the
masses and not of the classes”.
Post withdrawal of NCM he joined pro-changers with focus on civic
affairs of Calcutta.
Both Nehru and Bose were the Chief Administrative Officer of Calcutta and Allahabad respectively.
Supported Jawaharlal Nehru on anti-imperialist policies and favored Purna Swaraj.
But he did not support Jawaharlal Nehru’s view on the Gandhian way to achieve it.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
MODERN HISTORY
Lecture – 45
Working Class Movement
and Agrarian Discontent
2
❖ Even though there was a lack of concerted effort, there were some isolated, sporadic efforts directed towards
specific local grievances.
❖ In 1870, Sarispada Banerjea started workingmen’s club and newspaper Bharat Shramjeevi.
❖ In 1878, Sorabjee Shapoorji Bengalee tried to bring a bill, providing better working conditions to labour,
passed in the Bombay Legislative Council.
❖ In 1880, Narain Meghajee Lokhanday started the newspaper Deenbandhu and set up the Bombay Mill and
Millhands Association.
❖ In 1899 The first strike by the Great Indian Peninsular Railways took place and it got widespread support.
❖ Between 1900 – 1910 gave the first ever demonstration of the emerging political consciousness among the
Indian working class.
❖ The Bombay workers went on a political six-day strike over the conviction and imprisonment of Lokamanya
tilak in 1908 a development which elicited Lenin’s comments that “the Indian proletariat has already matured
sufficiently to wage a class-conscious and political mass struggle”.
❖ INC President Lal Lala Lajpat Rai was elected as its 1st President and Dewan Lal Chaman first General
secretary.
❖ Lala Lajpat Rai was the first to link capitalism with imperialism, “imperialism and militarism are the twin
children of capitalism”.
❖ Gaya session of 1922, welcomed the formation of AITUC and a committee was formed to assist it.
❖ CR Das who presided over the 3rd and 4th session of AITUC advocated that INC should take up workers
and peasants cause or else they would get isolated from the movement.
❖ Despite socialistic inclination it remained under the influence of the moderate NM Joshi.
❖ Other important INC leaders involved with AITUC: Jawaharlal Nehru, Subhas Bose, C F Andrews, J M
Sengupta, Satyamurthy, V V Giri and Sarojini Naidu.
❖ They believed in the ideals of democracy and performed under the periphery of Gandhian philosophy of
nonviolence, trusteeship and class collaboration
❖ Ahmedabad Mill strike: Gandhi helped the worker secure 27.5% wage hike which was further increased to
35% by arbitrator’s award.
Progress of trade unions can be marked according to the time period.
❖ Growth Period (1920-1929)
❖ Decline (1929-1935)
❖ Expansion (1935 onwards)
❖ Bengal
➢ 1928: Fort Gloster Mills’ workers went on strike with 15k jute workers for more than 6 months.
❖ Jamshedpur
➢ In 1928, the workers of Tata Steel factory went on strike and formed their Labour Association and forced
employers to recognise it.
➢ Tata was the first modern steel industry by Jamshedji Tata.
❖ Ahmedabad and Madras also witnessed the strike from workers. In 1923 in Madras first Day of May was
celebrated by Singaravelu to honour workers.
Suppression of Communists
❖ Coming together of nationalist and leftists and participation of the working class was concerning the britishers.
8
❖ Adopted a two-pronged strategy repressing labour movement by passing regressive laws (Public Safety and
Trade Disputes) other hand concession in the form of appointment of Royal Commission on Labour in 1929
under John Henry Whitley.
AITUC Division
❖ The Great Depression period impacted India till 1936 this resulted in shutting down of factories, the joblessness
split of AITUC also weakened the labour movement.
❖ First Split
➢ In 1929 Lahore Congress Session Jawaharlal Nehru became President.
➢ Issue of boycotting the Royal Commission on Labour extremists wanted to boycott it moderates wanted
to join it.
➢ Moderates led by NM Joshi and VV Giri formed the All India Trade Union Federation (VV Giri
President) apart from AITUC.
❖ Second Split
➢ In 1931, the Communists left AITUC and formed the Red Trade Union Congress.
➢ A void was created, workers followed congress and participated in Civil Disobedience Movement, it also
got the slogan “workers and peasants hands and feet of congress”.
➢ But this enthusiasm was absent in the second phase of the Civil Disobedience Movement.
❖ Meerut Conspiracy Case, March 1929: Government arrested 31 labour leaders who were later convicted
❖ Some important leaders were: Muzaffer Ahmed, S A Dange, Joglekar, Philip Spratt, Ben Bradley, Shaukat
Usmani and others
9
❖ Even though the trial got worldwide publicity it weakened the worker class movement.
❖ Workers participated in Civil Disobedience Movement 1930 but their participation dipped in 1931 due to the
split AITUC.
❖ The communists detached themselves from the Quit India Movement and advocated the policy of industrial
peace.
❖ M. N. Roy had formed a pro-Government union called the Indian Federation of Labour.
❖ In 1944 Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel organized the Indian National Trade Union Congress.
❖ Between 1945-47, the workers participated actively in post war national upsurges.
❖ In 1945, the workers refused to load ships taking supplies to the warring troops in Indonesia.
❖ In 1946, the workers went on a strike in support of the Naval ratings.
❖ During the later period of foreign rule, workers were involved in various strikes which got polarised on the
basis of political ideologies after independence.
❖ The indigo disturbances started in the autumn of 1859 when peasants refused to accept advances from the
planters in a wide region in the districts of Nadia, Murshidabad, and Pabna.
❖ The Jessore peasants joined hands in the spring sowing season of 1860, by which time the entire delta region
of Bengal had become affected.
❖ The Indigo revolt took place in Nadia district of Bengal in 1859 and was led by Digambar Biswas and
Bishnu Biswas who organized the peasants to resist the force of planter’s lathiyals (armed retainers).
❖ In April 1860, revolt initiated from the village of Gobindpur of Nadia district. Farmers let down the orders of
sowing indigo this stand of farmers also known as “first general strike in the history of Indian peasantry.”
❖ This strike spread to other places like Pabna, Khulna, Birbhum, Burdwan and Murshidabad.
❖ March 1860: The panic-stricken pro-planter lobby in Calcutta had a temporary legislation passed
compelling the peasants to fulfill their contractual obligations to sow indigo. The courts were flooded with
such cases and some of the overzealous magistrates forced the peasants to cultivate indigo.
❖ But Grant refused to extend the legislation beyond its life of 6 months and forbade the magistrates to compel
peasants to accept advances to cultivate indigo.
❖ The peasants also took their cases to courts, which were inundated with such law suites. The movement at this
stage turned into a no- rent campaign and as the planters sought to evict their defaulting tenants, the latter went
to court to establish their right as occupancy ryots under the Rent Act X of 1859. [same plot of land continually
for 12 years, which would entitle them to the protection].
❖ Din Bandhu Mitra authored Neel Darpan published in September 1860 led to the government forming an
Indigo Commission.
➢ Dinbandhu’s play Neel darpan depicted the atrocities of the planters in the boldest possible colour.
Translated into English by the famous Bengali poet Michael Madhusudan Dutta and was published by
Rev. James Long of the Church Missionary Society to bring it to the notice of the liberal political circles
in India and London. Play was later banned.
➢ Revolt was covered regularly by “The Bengalee” and “Hindoo Patriot”.
➢ For this, Long was tried for libel in the Calcutta Supreme Court and was fined Rs. 1,000 with a jail
sentence of one month. This enraged the Calcutta literati, as the Indian press, particularly the Hindoo
Patriot and Somprakash took up the cause of the indigo peasants, and the British Indian Association came
to their side as well.
➢ Thus, middle-class intelligentia succeeded in bringing the peasants' issue to the wider arena of institutional
politics and this resulted in a growing pressure on the planters.
❖ Famous slogan of the revolt - ‘je rakhak se bhakak’ (Protector has become Destroyer).
❖ Features of the revolt –
➢ There was cooperation, organization and discipline of the peasants,
➢ complete unity among Hindu and Muslims and
➢ a substantial role was played by Intelligentsia.
➢ Support from middle class section of Bengal
➢ Support from nationalists
13
Deccan Riots
❖ The Deccan region experencied heavy taxation under the Ryotwari system.
❖ Peasants found themselves trapped in an endless network with the moneylender as the exploiter and the main
beneficiary.
15
❖ Money lenders, whether Marwaris or Gujaratis, were often outsiders. A social boycott movement organized
by the ryots against the "outsider" moneylenders culminated in the increasing friction between the
moneylenders and the peasants in 1874.
❖ A situation for open conflict was soon created when the government increased the revenue rates in 1867 on
grounds of extension of cultivation and rise in agricultural prices. [50% - 200%]
❖ The cotton boom in Deccan, created by the artificial demand generated by the American Civil War, had just
crashed after the end of the war.
❖ The movement began at Supa, a village in Poona. (market centre where many shopkeepers and moneylenders
lived).
❖ Ryots from surrounding rural areas gathered and attacked the shopkeepers, demanding their account books and
debt bonds.
❖ They burnt account books, looted grain shops, and in some cases set fire to the houses of sahukars. The revolt
spread to Ahmednagar and then around 30 villages were affected.
❖ The movement spread rapidly to the villages of Poona, Ahmednagar, Solapur and Satara.
❖ It got transformed into agrarian riots with systematic attacks on the moneylender’s houses and shops.
❖ Repression: Police posts were established in villages and forced peasants to submit. Army was called in and
many were convicted. It took several months to bring the situation under control.
❖ Deccan Riots Commission: GOI pressurized the Bombay Government to set up a commission to investigate
into causes. The report was presented to the British parliament in 1878.
❖ The Deccan Agriculturists Relief Act was passed in 1879 in order to maintain peace and harmony.
Timeline of events:
❖ 1820: The 1st revenue settlement in Bombay. The revenue demand was so high that in many places peasants
left villages especially in areas of poor soil and fluctuating rainfall the problem was particularly acute.
16
❖ 1830s: Problem became more severe. Steep decline in Prices of agriculture after 1832 and did not recover for
over 15 years which further reduced peasants’ income.
➢ At the same time famine struck in the years 1832-34. 1/3 of the cattle of the Deccan were killed, and half
the human population died.
➢ Those who survived had no agricultural stocks to see them through the crisis.
Revenue could rarely be paid without a loan from a moneylender. But once a loan was taken, the ryot
found it difficult to pay back.
➢ As debt mounted, and loans remained unpaid, peasants’ dependence on moneylenders increased.
❖ 1840s: High level of peasant indebtedness observed everywhere.
❖ Cotton Boom: Before the 1860s, 3/4 of raw cotton imports into Britain came from America.
➢ 1861: American Civil War broke out. Raw cotton imports from America fell < 3% of the normal.
Messages were sent to India and elsewhere to increase cotton exports to Britain.
➢ In Bombay, cotton merchants visited the cotton districts to assess supplies and encourage cultivation and
were keen to secure as much cotton as possible to meet the British demand. They gave advances to
moneylenders who promised to secure the produce. The ryots in the Deccan villages suddenly found
access to seemingly limitless credit. Between 1860 and 1864 cotton acreage doubled.
➢ 1862: 90% cotton imports into Britain came from India.
➢ 1865: Civil War ended, cotton production in America revived and Indian cotton exports to Britain steadily
declined. Export merchants and moneylenders in Maharashtra were no longer keen to give credit. Demand
for Indian cotton fell and cotton prices slide downwards. While credit dried up, the revenue demand
increased.
➢ 1874 December: Riot was initiated from the village Kardah when a moneylender evicted Baba Saheb
Deshmukh. Villagers got anguished from this and organized a massive campaign. Boycotting outside
moneylender and social sanction who refuse to join movements especially on “balutedars” (who would
not join movement).
▪ 1st revenue settlement 1820s and 2nd in 1830s.
▪ Now it was time for the next demand to increase dramatically: from 50 to 100%. Moneylender now
refused loans as he no longer had confidence in the ryots capacity to repay. This annoyed the ryots.
▪ The movement also got support from the Poona Sarvajanik Sabha co-founded by M G Ranade.
1850s – 1950s:
❖ Such occurrences of peasant protests against moneylenders were quite common throughout India, as colonial
rule had significantly altered the relationship between the two groups in the political economy of the village.
❖ Similar patterns of peasant behaviour, i.e., little violence against persons, but destruction of the legal debt
bonds of the moneylenders.
➢ Saharanpur district of western UP in 1857
➢ Nasik in 1868,
➢ in the ghat regions between Bombay and Poona in 1874
➢ Ajmer district of Rajasthan in 1891
17
➢ Punjab in 1914
➢ East Bengal in 1930.
❖ Very clearly such disturbances were the reactions of Indian rural society against the adverse impact of the
British land system, the laws of property rights and courts, which appeared as alien impositions from above
that tended to turn their world upside down.
❖ No tax campaigns were reported in this period from different parts of India-from Awadh in the north in 1879,
from Cambay state in Gujarat in the west in 1890, from Tanjore district in the south in 1892-93 and from
Assam in the northeast in 1893-94.
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
MODERN HISTORY
Lecture – 46
Various British Policies
2
United Province Baba Ram Chandra organised the peasants of Oudh against the oppressive policies
by Zamindars and taluqdars.
It merged with NCM and became more militant in nature in Rae Bareli, Faizabad
and Sultanpur and compelled the colonial government to amend the rigorous Oudh
Rent Act of 1921.
Eka Movement, by Madari Pasi.
Bengal In 1921, no tax agitation started and refused to pay the Union Board taxes.
Midnapore emerged as the main centre of agitation.
Malabar In 1921, the revolt of Moplah or Mapilla against continued landlord oppression and
government stand towards anti-Khilafat activities.
Gujarat The non-violent Bardoli Satyagraha movement started in 1928 by Sardar Vallabhai
Patel.
The meetings of the Eka or the Unity Movement involved a symbolic religious ritual in which the assembled
peasants vowed that they would:
Pay only the recorded rent but would pay it on time.
Not leave when evicted.
Refuse to do forced labour.
Give no help to criminals.
Abide by panchayat decisions.
The Eka Movement's grassroots leadership came from Madari Pasi and other low-caste leaders and
several small Zamindars.
In March 1922, the rebellion was brought to an end by serious persecution by the government.
During popular movements in the late 1920s in northern India, two prominent figures were influencing
the people, they were Madari Pasi and Bhagat Singh.
Initially, the movement was supported by some Congress and Khilafat leaders and activists, but as soon
as the movement took a militant turn, the Congress-Khilafat leaders withdrew their support.
In such an environment, Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi, the editor of Hindi daily Pratap, who regularly
covered the Eka revolt.
One of the leaders of the Kisan Sabha in Kanpur, and had reported on the Baba Ramchandra-led Awadh
Peasant Revolt in great detail.
It is likely that through the daily Pratap, (Bhagat Singh served as its sub-editor), a lot of young
revolutionaries would have come to understand the peasant issue, which is later reflected in their political
writings and speeches.
Bhagat Singh and his companion stayed with Madari for a
few days as he was organising tribal peasants at this time
because he was by now sidelined in the tenants‘ struggle.
Madari Pasi dreamt of waging a guerrilla war against the
British. But the revolutionaries couldn‘t make use of his army
as they couldn‘t afford to blow the cover on their
underground movement owing to Madari‘s growing
impatience.
Revolutionaries of the HRA grew sympathetic to the cause of workers and peasants.
In 1928, they added the word ‗socialist‘ to their organisation‘s name. This shift was not merely a result of a
theoretical engagement with socialist and Marxist literature, rather it was also a product of engagement with
the everyday lives of peasants and workers.
4
Indian journalist, a leader of the Indian National Congress and an independence movement activist.
He became a prominent figure of the well-known revolutionary Hindi and Urdu journals – Karamyogi and
Swarajya and also began to contribute to them.
In 1928, he also founded the Mazdur Sabha and led it until his death in 1931.
Mappila Revolt:
The Mappilas were the Muslim tenants who occupied the land where Hindus were most of the landlords.
The Mappilas demonstrated their indignation during the nineteenth century against the injustice of the
landlords as well.
Lack of security of tenure, high rents, renewal fees and other oppressive conditions were their grievances.
The Mappila tenants were especially encouraged by the demand from the local Congress body for a
government legislation which regulates tenant-landlord relationships.
Soon, with the ongoing Khilafat agitation, the Mappila movement merged.
The leadership passed into the hands of local Mappila leaders after the arrest of the national leaders.
In August 1921, when the arrest of a revered chief priest, Ali Musaliar, triggered large-scale riots, things took
a turn for the worse.
Initially, British authority symbols such as courts, police stations, treasuries and offices and unpopular
landlords (jenmies, mostly Hindus) were targeted.
But once the British declared martial law and repression began in
earnest, the character of the rebellion underwent a definite change.
The communalization of the rebellion completed the isolation of the Mappilas from the Khilafat-Non-
Cooperation Movement.
A report submitted to the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR) in 2016 had recommended the de-
listing of Wagon Tragedy victims and Malabar Rebellion leaders Ali Musliyar, Variamkunnath Ahmad Haji,
and the latter's two brothers from a book on martyrs of India's freedom struggle. In all, the report had sought
the removal of names of 387 'Moplah rioters' from the list.
Wagon Tragedy
In 1921, the death of 70 prisoners in the Malabar region of Kerala state of India.
The prisoners had been taken into custody following the Mappila Rebellion against the British in various parts
of Malappuram district.
On 19 November 1921, when the uprising was near its end, almost 100 people were sent by train from Tirur to
the Central Prison, Bellary in the Madras Presidency. When they opened the wagon in Podanur, 70 of them had
died.
Their deaths through apparent negligence discredited the British Raj and generated sympathy for the Indian
independence movement.
In Eranad and Walluvanad taluks, it took the form of an armed rebellion by the Muslim Mappila community.
In Surat district, the nucleus of this highly politicized peasant movement was the Bardoli taluqa.
Vallabhai Patel led the movement. For his leadership, the locals gave him the title of 'Sardar.'
When the British government, in present- day Gujarat, raised the land revenue by 30 percent, resistance was
shown by the people.
This led to the organization of a ‗No-Revenue Campaign‘ by the Bardoli peasants including women.
An intelligence wing was set up to ensure tenants support the resolution and follow it.
The publication of ―
Bardoli Satyagraha Patrika‖ took place for awareness.
Lalji Naranji and K. M. Munshi resigned from the Bombay Legislative Council in support of the
movement.
There were unsuccessful attempts by the British to suppress the movement. But finally, a Bardoli Enquiry
committee was appointed to look into the matter. It found the hike unjustified.
6
Kisan Manifesto adopted in this sabha influenced the agrarian program in the Faizpur session. The
Manifesto was edited by Indulal Yagnik.
Objectives
Abolition of landlordism like Zamindari and Taluqdari.
Protection of peasants from exploitation and reduction in revenue.
Licensing of Moneylenders
Providing minimum wages.
Fair price of commodities
The Second Session at Faizpur
The President was NG Ranga.
Jawahar Lal Nehru, M.N Roy, Narendra Dev, SA Dange, MR Masani, Yusuf Mehrally, Bankim
Mukherjee were some of the prominent leaders of the session.
Swami Sahajanand (1889-1950):
An ascetic, a nationalist and a peasant leader of India.
He was born in Uttar Pradesh (Ghazipur).
Some of his Notable events:
In 1937-1938, he organised Bakasht Movement in Bihar.
"Bakasht" means self-cultivated.
It was against the eviction of tenants from Bakasht lands by zamindars and led to the passing of the Bihar
Tenancy Act and the Bakasht Land Tax.
He also led the successful struggle in the Dalmia Sugar Mill at Bihta, UP, where peasant-worker unity
was the most important characteristic.
On Saraswati's arrest during the Quit India Movement, SC Bose and All India Forward Bloc decided to
observe 28 April as All-India Swami Sahajanand Day in protest of his incarceration by the British Raj.
His notable literary works were Bhumihar Brahmin Parichay, Jhootha Bhay Mithya Abhiman,
Karmakalap, in Sanskrit and Hindi.
Peasant Movement in 1930s:
Problems
This phase witnessed the aftermath of the Great Depression and Civil Disobedience Movement.
In spite of the global slowdown due to the Great Depression, the government did not bring down the
taxes and neither ordered zamindars to lower their taxes.
The workers participated in the Civil Disobedience Movement which took the theme of the no-rent, no-
tax movement.
8
The formation of the Congress Socialist Party and the growth of the leftist movement further
strengthened their stand.
Movements in various regions:
United Province:
It was the main centre for revolt.
No-revenue and no-rent movement. The No-revenue movement was against the government. And no-rent
against Zamindar.
Kalka Prasad of Rae Bareli urged peasant refugees to pay any kind of payment.
Bengal and Bihar
No-tax agitation.
Peasants of Manbhum, Singbhum and Dijnapur came together to join Salt Satygraha.
Agitation against chowkidar tax.
⮚ Madras
Andhra Ryots Association by NG Ranga for anti-zamindari struggle, reduction of rent
Venkatgiri zamindari at Nellore was the first target.
Movement along with CDM consolidated its stand in Tanjore, Madua and Salem.
Organisation of Summer School of Economics and Politics for peasant activities.
Kerala
Peasants mobilized mainly by the Congress socialist activists.
Existence of Karsak Sangams like Peasants Organisations organised strong agitations against the
Karakkattidam janmi and Kallyatt Janmi.
The popular methods were marching of jaths to the landlords for their acceptance of demands.
Malabar Tenancy Act 1938 was the result of the significant campaign by the peasants.
Bihar
Sahjanand Saraswati was joined by Yadunandan Sharma, Karyanand Sharma, Rahul Sankritayan,
Jamun Karjiti, Panchartan Sharma.
In 1935, the Provincial Kisan Conference adopted the anti-Zamindari slogan.
The Provincial Kisan Sabha developed a rift with the Congress over the bakasht land (self-cultivated)
issue because of an unfavorable government resolution which was not acceptable to the sabha.
The movement ceased to exist by August 1939.
Andhra
Many provincial ryot associations were active.
9
K. B. Hedgewar (1889-1940)
He was known as Doctorji.
In 1925, he founded the RSS in Nagpur based on the ideology of Hindutva with the intention of creating a
Hindu Rashtra.
He joined the Anushilan Samiti in Bengal.
The movement was against imposing Canal Tax after the construction of the Damodar Canal.
The sharecroppers were poor peasants who worked on the landlord's farm and were given a portion of
produce.
Hali Movement
The farms were leased in Bengal by rich farmers (Jotedars) to sharecroppers known as Bargadar or
Bagchasi or Adhyar.
Tebhaga was recommended by the Floud Commission, in which the Bargadars (sharecropper) should get
2/3 of crop share and the Jotedar (landlord) should get 1/3 of crop yield share.
The goal of the Tebhaga movement was to enforce the recommendations of the Floud Commission through
mass struggle.
It was led by Kisan Sabha, Bengal Provincial [BPKS], against the Zamindars, wealthy farmers (Jotedars),
moneylenders, local bureaucrats and traders.
12
In September 1946 - BPKS decided to launch the Tebhaga movement and soon it spread to a wide
region where peasants harvested the paddy and took it to their own khamar (storehouse) and then invited
the landlords to come and take their one-third share.
Although north Bengal districts were the worst affected by this sharecroppers' agitation, contrary to popular
notion, Tebhaga movement touched a wider region, covering almost every district in eastern, central and
western Bengal. Here the peasants carved out their Tebhaga Elaka or liberated zones, where they instituted
alternative administrations and arbitration courts.
The Muslim League government led by the Suharwardy proposed the Bargardari Bill along with repression
by force but the bill was dropped due to opposition by Congress and League.
Telangana Movement:
This took place in the princely state of Hyderabad under Asafjahi Nizams.
Total lack of political and civil liberties, grossest forms of forced exploitation by Deshmukhs, Jagirdars,
Doras i.e., Landlords in forms of forced labour i.e., Vethi and illegal exactions became the causes for this
movement.
The wartime exactions, abuse of rationing, excessive rent and Vethi further deepen the crisis for peasants.
In July 1946, Deshmukh‘s thug murdered a village militant in Jangaon Taluq of Nalgonda.
Then the movement spread to Warangal and Khammam. The peasants organized themselves into village
sanghams, and attacked using lathis, stone slings and chilli powder.
It was at its greatest intensity between August 1947 and September 1948.
The peasants brought about a rout of the Razakars, the Nizam‘s storm troopers.
Major accomplishments:
The tradition of fituri survived in the hills of Gudem and Rampa, but by the 1920s it was seeking to extend to
the outer world by trying to connect itself to the wider tradition of Gandhian mass movements.
In 1922, the Second Rampa Rebellion led by Alluri Sitaram Raju in Madras presidency against the laws
created by the English on the subjects of forest rights, condition on ―pod
u‖ (slash and burn) and forced
labour.
Raju died in 1924 in a guerrilla warfare struggle.
Komaram Bheem (11901–1940) was a revolutionary leader in Hyderabad from the Gond tribes. Bheem in
association with other Gond leaders and communist revolutionaries led a protracted low intensity rebellion
against the feudal Nizams of Hyderabad and the British Raj in the eastern part of the princely state during the
1930s which contributed to the culmination of the Telangana Rebellion of 1946.
He was killed by armed policemen in 1940, subsequently lionised as a symbol of rebellion and eulogised in
Adivasi and Telugu folklore. Bheem is deified as a pen in Gond culture and is credited for coining the slogan
Jal, Jangal, Zameen (Water, Forest, Land) which symbolising a sentiment against encroachment and
exploitation, has been adopted by Adivasi movements as a call to action. He is also closely associated with
the movement for Telangana statehood.
Protests in Princely States:
If the local rulers tried to enforce restrictions on shifting cultivation, the tribal peasants resisted
In 1910, Marias and Murias of Bastar openly attacked the police stations and killed foreigners and
could be brought under control only if a British army contingent was called in.
The tribal peasants on the fringes of settled agricultural areas were affected equally by forest laws.
In Madras Presidency, forest crimes increased manifold.
In Travancore, the peasants refused to cooperate with the forest department officials.
Thane district of coastal Maharashtra witnessed violent protests.
In Jungle Mahal in Midnapur district of Bengal, Santhals looted village markets and fisheries.
In the Himalayan Forest tracts of UP
Tehri Garhwal (a princely state): The Peasants followed the old tradition of dhandak, which was
protesting against the tyranny of the officials and appealing for justice to the sovereign. When the local
raja tried to enforce stricter conservancy laws, the peasants protested in 1886 and then again in 1904.
Some concessions from the raja failed to satisfy the peasants and in December 1906 they became violent
in their protest against the local conservator and the raja had to appeal to the British for assistance.
In Kumaun (directly under the British): The protests were directly against the British, as the peasants
resisted the system of utar or forced labour and the tyrannous forest management. Mostly this
protest was of non-confrontational nature, like the defiance of law, theft of timber, incendiarism and
finally, purposefully firing the reserved forests.
16
Oraons (Chotanagpur 1914- It was led by Jatra Bhagat and Tana Bhagat.
15) The revolt was started by Jatra Bhagat for monotheism.
Abstention from meat, liquor and tribal dances and return to shifting
cultivation.
It developed links with Gandhian nationalism but was suppressed.
Koya Rebellion (1879-80) Eastern Godavari region present day Andhra Pradesh and Odisha.
The root causes of the revolt were corrosion of forest rights, high interest
rates, and torches from moneylenders.
The prominent leader of the revolt was Tomma Dora (hailed as King of
Malkangiri.
They started capturing the police station.
17
Assam Revolt Chain of revolt in Assam during the time period from 1893-1900)
Kuka Uprising in Punjab Kuka, were also referred to as Namdharis, who were a sect within Sikhism.
(1872) It was started by Baba Ram Singh.
The movement received a political overtone with the established aim of
restoring Sikh rule in Punjab and ousting the foreign powers.
In 1872, Ram Singh was captured and exiled to Rangoon and 65 Kukas
were blown away from canons by the British.
Ramosi Uprising It was led by Vasudev Balwant Phadke in counter act to oppression by
moneylenders.
Hos and Munda | Chota Nagpur & Singhbhum (1820, 1822 & 1831):
The occupation of Singhbhum by the British and exploitation of tribals.
Raja of Parahat organised Ho initially.
The Hos tribals were suppressed by the British.
Later joined by Mundas in 1831 when Hos revolted again against the newly introduced revenue policy and
entry of Bengalis into their region.
They challenged the Britishers and there was disturbance till 1837.
1890-1900:
Mundas rose again under Birsa Munda.
It was also known as Ulgulan, meaning revolt.
There was massive uprising in 1899-1900
Birsa raj and Birsaite religion
It was against the erosion of their Khunt Katti land system (joint ownership or holding of land by tribal
lineage).
The recruitment of forced labour (beth-begari) and the activities of Christian missionaries.
They attacked churches and police stations.
18
Birsa Munda ("Dharthi Aba"= father of the earth), as known amongst tribal, waged a massive war
against the British rule in mid-1890's.
After the suppression of the first rising in 1895 the Birsa gave a call to the Munda of a decisive war against
the British.
After a series of concerted attacks for nearly two years on the places loyal to the British, the Munda warriors
started congregating on " Dombari Hill " at village "Sail Rakab " on the call of Birsa. Adopted Guerilla
warfare, attacked the British in Ranchi and Khunti.
Several persons, mostly policemen, were killed and nearly 100 buildings
were set on fire.
Struggle (Ulgulan) & "Abua Disun" (self-rule):
Subsequently the British forces attacked heavily and created ―
Topped
Buru" - mound of dead.
Birsa Munda was nabbed while he was fast asleep at "Jamkopai‖ forest
in Chakradharpur on March 3, 1900.
Birsa Munda died in Ranchi jail on 9th June 1900.
Munda Rebellion (1874-1901):
It was led by Birsa Munda from 1895.
Root causes were loss of land in hand to moneylenders, intrusion of jagirdars,
revenue farmers and merchant moneylenders.
Christianity touch: Tribal accepted Christianity believing that German
missionaries will help against the zamindars failing to turn to catholic mission.
The Munda sardars turned rebellious against outsiders and rose in rebellion as
``ulgulan‖.
1899: The Munda declared the establishment of Munda rule by killing
jagirdars, rajas and hakims (rulers), Christians.
This movement witnessed the active participation of women.
In counter-suppression by the English, Munda died in 1900.
Characteristics of Peasant and Tribal Revolts Post 1857:
Most of the revolts were localised ones.
The revolt was based on community rather than class.
Role of the middle class played a significant role.
There was a contribution of Indian Intelligentsia.
There was a communal connection to revolt.
19
Wellesley blocked the free flow of the press and kept the siege and halt in growth of newspapers from the
time of Wellesley to Minto.
In 1807, this act was extended to cover journals, pamphlets and even books.
The objective was to shut down the criticism and suppress the power of the press.
This regulation was abolished by Hastings in 1818.
Lord Hastings was in favour of a free Press and encouraged the Press to perform its duties in a responsible
manner. In 1818, pre-censorship was suspended. New regulations were issued which made the Press almost
free, though at the same time prohibited it from publishing offensive and objectionable criticism.
He refused to cancel the licence of James Buckingham (Calcutta Journal editor) or deport him against the
wishes of his council, especially John Adams.
Newspaper in India in the time period of 1818-1857:
This phase witnessed a number of print materials on daily, weekly and monthly basis.
The Serampore missionary press (William Carey) was a pioneer in Indian Journalism.
In 1818, the First Indian Vernacular newspaper ―D
igdarshan‖ was started by them and then Samachar
Darpan.
―T
he Friend of India‖ acted as the precursor of ―T
he Statesman‖ was also started.
James Silk Buckingham started ―C
alcutta Journal‖.
First Indian owned newspaper ―
Bengal Gazette‖ was started by Gangadhar Bhattacharya in 1816.
Adam‘s Regulation of 1818 passed for surveillance of newspapers.
In 1821, Weekly journals like Sambad Kaumudi (Bengali), Mirat-ul-Akbar (Persian) were started by
Ram Mohan Roy for discouraging sati pratha. It was later stopped.
In 1823, the Departure of Hasting and the appointment of John Adam as Governor-General. Nothing
reformative took place in his time period in fact more stringent rules were imposed known as ―A
dam‘s
Gag‖.
Press Regulations of 1823 [Licencing Regulation]:
A Commission had been appointed under Sir Thomas Munro to investigate and report the problem of the
Indian Press.
The report of the Commission favoured the retention of censorship as the Press could incite the native people
to be disaffected towards British rule and excite them to drive out the foreigners. John Adams (acting
Governor-General) accepted the recommendations of the Commission and made new regulations in 1823.
Every printer was bound now to acquire a government license and
Every publication was to be submitted to the government for inspection.
Penalty for printing without licence.
⮚ Governor General can revoke the licence
22
It was directed against the Indian press. Raja Ram Mohan Roy‘s Mirat ul Akbar was stopped. Only 3 Bengali
and 1 Persian newspaper continued in Calcutta.
JS Buckingham was deported to England.
Regulation of 1825 (Lord Amherst):
Adam was succeeded by Amherst following their predecessor's policy of gagging press.
Lord William Bentinck did not revoke the laws of Adams but had a liberal attitude towards the press.
Bentinck understood the role played by the vernacular press and due to this the vernacular press started
making rapid strides under him.
Introduced licensing of press for the first time and free press ordinance. Ordinance stated that prior
requirement of licensing except for commercial matters.
Prohibited EIC staff from indulging in any relation with the printing press.
Press Act of 1835 by Lord Metcalfe (liberator of Indian Press) - Licensing Abolished:
Metcalfe supported a strong view on freedom of the press.
Invited Macaulay for drafting Press Act, the proposal included abolishing of licensing regulations, and
freedom of publication without permission.
Metcalfe‘s Act of 1835 is considered as the most liberal press act in the history of British India.
Licensing was replaced by providing precise information about the publication.
In 1835, the growing period, and newspaper ran till 1875.
He was succeeded by Auckland who continued Metcalfe's legacy.
Licensing Act of 1857 by Lord Canning:
The licensing act came in the outbreak of 1857.
The Licensing Act of 1857 imposed licensing restrictions again due to mutiny, though they were withdrawn
soon after the Mutiny. The condition of the licence was removed.
Lord Canning re-introduced licensing.
The regulation or prohibition of press and printed material applicable to Indian and Anglo-Indian.
Canning allowed the act to expire in 1858.
After revoking, the press began to flow again.
Indian Penal Code:
It was equipped with offences like defamation and obscenity by the writers.
It extended to sensitive issues like public threat.
1870: Sedition (section 124) added.
1898: Promoting enmity between classes (sec.153A).
23
Decision of the DM was final and no appeal could be made in the court.
Proceedings against Som Prakash, The Bharat Mihir, the Dacca Prakash and The Sahachar.
Except for the restrictions placed by Sections 124 A and 121 A, the press remained almost free till 1908.
The reactionary policy of Lord Curzon had caused a stir among the Indians.
The Indian Official Secrets Act (Act XIV), 1889 was brought in, with the objective of muzzling the voice
of a large number of newspapers that had come up in several languages, and were opposing the British
policies.
The Act XIV was amended and made more stringent in the form of The Indian Official Secrets Act, 1904,
during Lord Curzon‘s tenure as Viceroy of India.
In 1923, a newer version was notified, the Indian Official Secrets Act (Act No XIX of 1923).
It was extended to all matters of secrecy and confidentiality in governance in the country.
His educational policy and partition of Bengal had really disaffected the Indian people and the Indian press
launched an open anti-British campaign. So, the Newspapers (Incitement to Offences) Act was passed in
1908.
Local Govt can annul the declaration made by the publisher of the offending newspaper.
The Act of 1908 failed to produce the desired effect and hence the enactment of the Indian Press Act 1910.
It revived the worst of Lytton acts like deposition of security. It passed to control sentiments after partition of
Bengal.
Local governments could demand at the time of registration security (Rs.500- Rs.2000) from the keeper
of the printing press or publisher of a newspaper.
Forfeit the security and annul the declaration of registration of an offending newspaper.
The government may allow fresh registration (security Rs.1000-10000) and forfeit the fresh security and
annul the fresh declaration, confiscate press and all copies if offence persists.
Aggrieved parties can appeal to Special Tribunals of High courts within 2 months.
This act gave rise to strong protests. But during World War – I, it was enforced stringently resulting in the
confiscation of $ 40,000 of security deposited by about 300 papers.
However, in 1921 a Press Enquiry Committee was appointed under Sir Tej Bahadur Sapru. On the
recommendations of the Committee the act of 1908 and 1910 were repealed.
27
The Commission, recommended the establishment of the Council on a statutory basis on the ground that
the Council should have the legal authority to make inquiries as otherwise each member, as well as the
Council as a whole, would be subject to the threat of legal action from those whom it sought to punish by
exposure.
The Commission said that the Council should consist of men who would command general confidence
and respect of the profession and should have 25 members excluding the Chairman. The Chairman was to be
a person who was or had been a Judge of the High Court and was to be nominated by the Chief Justice of
India.
The Press Council of India was first constituted on 4th July 1966 as an autonomous, statutory, quasi-judicial
body, with Shri Justice J R Mudholkar, then a Judge of the Supreme Court, as Chairman.
Working Journalists and Other Newspaper Employees (Condition of Service) and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act, 1955 passed to implement the recommendation of the first press commission which sought
to modify the condition of services of journalists and newspaper employees.
PW Web/App: https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Modern History
Lecture - 47
Various British Policies II
2
Famine Policy
The committee held Government system responsible for creating the famine like conditions.
It proposed that the Government during famine times must organize the relief measures.
Steps should be taken for employment generation immediately so that the impact of famine could be
mitigated.
The recommendations of Campbell committee were not given much attention.
The great famine of 1876-78 was perhaps the most grievous calamity experienced since the beginning of
the 19th century.
It affected Madras, Bombay, Uttar Pradesh and the Punjab.
About five million people perished in a single year.
The Government made half-hearted efforts to help the famine-stricken.
The government famine machinery was inadequate and ineffective and the unwise policy was amply clear,
In 1880 the Government of Lytton appointed a Commission under the presidency of Sir Richard Strachey
to formulate general principles and suggest particular measures of a preventive or protective character.
Sir Richard Strachey Commission 1880
It should be the duty of the state to provide gratuitous relief to the poor and listed the category of persons
entitled to receive it.
Supplies of food in the distressed areas should be carefully watched.
Suspensions and remissions of land revenue and rents.
The cost of famine relief should be borne by the provincial governments.
However, Central assistance was to be made available whenever necessary.
In times of excessive drought, facilities should be provided for migration of cattle to grassy forest areas
where abundant pasturage was available.
Employment on work must be offered before physical efficiency is impaired.
A famine code should be formulated.
Irrigation facilities should be developed.
Data should be collected about the conditions of Indian peasantry and agriculture. A famine fund should be
set up.
The Government accepted in general the Commission’s recommendations and steps were taken to find new
resources for the creation of Famine Fund (1 cr) to meet extraordinary charges. In 1883 [Rippon] the
provisional famine code was formulated which formed a guide to and basis for the provincial famine codes.
The code provided for precautions to be taken in ordinary times,
The instructions to be followed during relief campaign and the duties of all concerned when the famine
actually began.
Districts might be declared by the provincial government as scarcity or famine areas.
Duties of all concern during actual famine
4
Closely following this came the famine of 1896 - 97. It affected almost every province though in varying
degrees of intensity and the total population affected was estimated at 34 million. The relief measures were
conducted with a fair degree of success. Expensive relief operations were undertaken and in many parts of
the country, people were relieved in their own homes.
A commission presided over by Sir James Lyall, ex-Lt Governor of Punjab, adhered to largely the views
expressed by their predecessors in 1880 suggesting some alterations which were designed to impart greater
flexibility to the maxims then adopted.
Following the famine of 1899-1900, and the failure of the government of Lord Curzon appointed Sir
Anthony MacDonnell who submitted its report in 1901 in which it summarized accepted principles of relief
suggesting variations wherever necessary.
MacDonnell Commission 1901
Relief reported was excessive
A famine code should be formulated for the administration of relief.
Preventive measures to be taken:
Suspension and remission of land revenue.
Agricultural banks
Advances by the Government
Indebtedness in Bombay presidency
Agricultural development
Railways me be good for famine relief
But irrigation is good for famine protection.
Recommended payment by task force for able-bodied.
The commission emphasized the benefits of a policy of moral strategy, early distribution of advances for
purchase of seed and cattle and sinking of temporary wells.
It also advocated the appointment of a famine commissioner in a province when relief operations were
expected to be extensive.
It also emphasized enlistment of non-official assistance on a larger scale and preference in particular
circumstances of village works to large public works which had hitherto been the backbone of relief
schemes.
The commission also stressed the importance of better transport facilities, opening of agricultural banks,
improvement of irrigation facilities, and vigorous measures to faster improved methods of agriculture.
Most of the recommendations of the commission were accepted and before Curzon left India, he had taken
various measures to prevent and combat famine.
With the enactment of the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms, the famine relief measures and
responsibility was entrusted to the provincial government in the year 1921. Though, the British took the
above said measures, on famine they proved inadequate to provide relief to the millions.
5
The vastness of the country, diverse causes for famines and supervisory approach by the government
failed to bring out desired results. And above all the basic culture of a colonial rule with its exploitation
and extractive orientation prevented any whole-hearted effort in this sphere and failed to provide relief
and easy recovery to the millions in India.
The Great Bengal Famine of 1942-43 took a heavy toll of life. This famine might be called “more
man-made than an act of God”.
Root causes were failure of crops at Bengal and normal rice imports from Burma stopped.
Famine Commissions
Viceroy Year Chairman Objectives
Lytton (1876-1880) 1880 Richard Strachey Providing relief of famine stricken
Civil Services
Cornwallis’ Role (1786-93)
Wellesley’s Role
Charter Act of 1853
Indian Civil Service Act 1861
Statutory Civil Services
Aitchison Committee on Public services 1886
Montford Reforms
Lee Commission 1924
Government of India Act 1935
Warren Hastings made first attempt to separate Administrative and Commercial branches.
He appointed European collectors & created nucleus of Civil Services.
Civil Services under EIC
East India Company had servants with Low salary and for that reason they carried private trade.
Later they assumed administrative duties.
They were highly corrupt
Oppressed zamindars, merchants, local weavers and artisans
Extorted gifts and bribes from Nawabs and Raja’s
Carried illegal private Trade and remitted wealth to Britain
Robert Clive and Warren Hastings tried to end corruption but failed, Cornwallis maintained the Patronage
System till 1858.
18th cent. Recruitment system was built on the existing tradition of military labour market [non-Indian]
along with colonial stereotypes.
Rice eating was preferred over wheat eating and Caste rules were fall on High caste army [Brahmins and
Rajputs].
Lucrative for Indian
Regular wages
Allowances
Person – prestige
Cornwallis followed Warren Hastings for the recruitment of Hill tribes 1802 and Gorkha soldiers 1815.
In 1820 there was stable empire and Company’s finances was in trouble and attempts to streamline the army
administration with stricter control on the army.
Reforms in 1830 took place with universal military culture and infringed high caste status but discontent
grew.
In 1840s disaffection and prepared the backdrop of 1857 revolt.
After 1857, systematic organisation of Army was observed. Main reason was to prevent another 1857 like
revolt. Another reason was to reorganise Indian Army in order to use it to defend its territories in India from
foreign powers like Russia, France, etc.
The Reorganisation:
The India section of the Indian Army was to be used for expansion in Asia and Africa while the British
section was to be used to retain its hold, India.
The proportion of English to Indian soldiers in the Army was fixed at 1: 2 in Bengal and 2: 5 in Madras
and Bombay.
European control was established over important locations and departments of the army such as
Artillery, Tanks, etc.
11
While reorganizing the Indian army in the post-1857 revolt, the Jonathan Peel Commission had the task of
identifying social groups and regions from which ‘loyal’ soldiers could be recruited.
The principle it emphasized was that the native army should be composed of different nationalities and
castes and mixed promiscuously through each regiment.
Regiments which had mutinied were disbanded, castes were more evenly mixed, Punjab became more
important and regional elements like Punjab, Hindustan, Bombay and Madras were kept separate.
Recruiting of soldiers was seen more in terms of the communities to which they belonged rather than as
individuals. Caste, religion and ethnicity or race became more crucial while enlisting a soldier. Punjab now
became a major catchment area for the Bengal Army.
By late 1870s, the Bombay Army and Madras Army began to be looked upon as being definitely inferior to
the Bengal Army.
1879: The Ashley Eden [Army] Commission set up reconfirmed the policy enunciated by the Peel
Commission and following doctrine was stated.
1880s, a doctrine was spelt out, which divided Indian society into two broad categories, namely, martial and
non-martial.
According to this, good soldiers can only come from specific communities.
The system developed under Lord Roberts, Commander in Chief from 1887-1892.
It was used to justify the discriminatory recruitment policy towards Sikhs, Gurkhas and Pathans who
has supported British in suppressing the 1857 revolt.
Soldiers from Awadh, Bihar, Central India, South India who participated in the revolt were declared
non-martial.
12
Communal, Caste, Tribal, regional consciousness were increased to check the rise of nationalist feeling
among workers.
Canal Colony agitation 1907: At the time of Partition of Bengal (1905), the soldiers of Jat paltan revolted and
sided with Bengali revolutionaries to take over the government treasury. Their revolt was crushed by British
colonists and several Jat soldiers had to suffer long imprisonment sentences.
13
December 1887 session, the Congress demanded that the military service in the commissioned grades
should be opened to the natives of the country and that the government should establish military colleges in
the country where natives could be trained for a military career as officers of the Indian Army.
General Frederick Roberts, C-in-C, rejected the proposal on the ground, saying: “No rank that we could
bestow upon them could cause him to be considered equal by the British Officer, or looked up to by the
British soldier in the same way that he looks up to the last joined British subaltern.”
Till WW I, the highest rank obtained by an Indian in the army was that of Subedar, and that too was given at
a ripe age of 65 to 70 years.
It was only after 1918, Indians were allowed in the commissioned rank.
In June 1925 - Indian Sandhurst Committee or Skeen Committee was appointed.
This committee recommended that the number of vacancies at Sandhurst be increased from 10 to 20.
Visualized 50% Indian officers by 1952
Indians be made eligible as Kings’ Commissioned Officers in Artillery, Signals and Engineers too and that a
military college be opened in India.
The government did not accept the recommendations of the Skeen Committee in full but agreed to increase
the vacancies reserved for Indians at Sandhurst from 10 to 20 per year.
14
Hardinge Royal Commission on Civil 1912 Islington giving 25% high post to Indian
Service
Reading Royal Commission 1924 Lee removing the defects of civil
services
Reading Sandhurst Committee 1926 Andrew Suggest Indianization of Indian
Skeen army
Irwin Butler Committee 1927 Harcourt Examine nature of crown relation
Butler with native states.
15
Economic Committee
Lansdown Harshell Committee 1893 Harshell Suggestion on the matter of
currency
Lansdown Opium Commission 1893 Thomas Brassey Investigate the effect of opium on
health
Elgin Henry Fowler Commission 1898 H. Fowler Examine the currency situation
British Policies
Indian Press
Famine Policy
Evolution of Civil Services
Evolution of Military
Evolution of Judiciary
Administration
Police System
Judicial System in Bengal
Zamindar decided civil and criminal cases
Arbitration was popular and favoured the rich.
Interference by Englishmen was frequent
In 1765 the Acquisition of Diwani took place and civil jurisdiction passed to EIC.
Handled by deputy diwan – Riza Khan and criminal jurisdiction of Nawabs
17720 Warren Hastings = Mughal model
16
In 1774 Supreme court in calcutta was established under Regulating Act. It was competent to try all british
subject.
Issue with new supreme court:
Outside Calcutta- Complaints against or between Indians can be heard only with consent of parties.
Supreme Court used English laws while sadar diwani adalat used religious personal law.
Jurisdiction of SC often clash with other courts.
To avoid friction in 1780 Hastings appointed Impey, chief justice of SC, as superintendent for sardar
diwani adalat but this was disallowed by court of directors and made him to resign in 1782.
So, the dualism continues.
17
1814
As per the COD
Appointment of darogas and subordinates was abolished
Exception: Bengal
22
Bentinck 1828-1935
Abolished the office of Sati Pratha.
Collector/magistrate will lead the police force
Commissioner in each division was to act as Sati Pratha.
Resulted in a bad organised force
Heavy toll on collector and magistrate
Police commission 1860: Recommendations
A system of civil constabulary
Maintaining the village in the present form (i.e., a village watchman to be maintained) but in direct
relationship with the rest of the constabulary
Inspector General as the head in province
Deputy inspector general to head in a range
SP to head a district.
This led to Indian Police Act 1861
They succeeded in curbing the criminal acts
Attitude was not sympathetic towards public
Suppressed the National movement
23
The Mughal police system prevailed, when the East India Company established its control over Bengal, after
acquiring the Diwani rights in 1765. In this system:
Faujdars were in charge of rural districts.
Kotwals were in charge of the towns.
The village watchmen used to look after villages. The village policing was under the control of the
Zamindars who paid and controlled the watchmen.
Cornwallis System
With the expansion of the Company's authority, a need was felt for the introduction of a police set up which
maintained the regulation and order.
The growing crime rates were perceived as challenge by Company to its authority.
The reforms started via replacing the Faujdars with English Magistrates at the district level whilst the
Zamindars retained their police functions, although they had been made subservient to the magistrates.
24
The new device proved to be insufficient in bringing down the crime rate, whilst the Zamindars abused the
device by means of taking gain of its weaknesses.
Lord Cornwallis realized the want for police reforms and he made many modifications in the police
organization. He deprived the Zamindars of their policing powers, divided the district into thanas or devices
of police jurisdiction of twenty to thirty miles. Each unit was once below an officer regarded as the Daroga
who was once appointed via the magistrates and positioned beneath their supervision. This came to be
known as the Cornwallis system.
Functions of Police System
Under the Darogas, the modern police system was an alien feature in the countryside and not completely
independent of the large local-landed magnates. The latter also maintained a large part of their extra-legal
coercive powers, and there was an alliance between the Darogas and the Zamindars in many instances. In
Bengal's rural life in the nineteenth century, the Daroga- Zamindar nexus emerged as the latest instrument of
coercion and oppression. The Daroga system was applied to Madras in 1802 and to the Ceded and
Conquered Upper Provinces in 1803 and 1804, respectively.
The Cornwallis system failed to yield the desired results in maintaining law and order. One of the prime
reasons for its failure was that the system was "not founded in the usages of the country" The colonial
authorities looked for excuses and made the native subordinate officers simple scapegoats if there was a
large-scale breakdown of law and order. They were accused of lack of integrity and morality, which was
focused on their stereotyping.
Other Changes Made
Jonathan Duncan, the resident of Banaras, made more modifications when the regulation was extended to
Banaras in 1795, to make the tehsildars, who were to be in charge of the police units, more subordinate to the
magistrates and the Zamindars in their estates more responsible for crime prevention.
In 1802, the daroga system was applied to Madras and the tehsildar system in 1803 and 1804, respectively, to
the Ceded and Conquered Upper Provinces.
But the system has created catastrophic outcomes everywhere.
Sir Charles Napier System
After conquering Sindh by Sir Charles Napier in 1843, a new system was tested under this model.
The entire region was put under the oversight of the Inspector General (IG). There were Superintendents of
Police (SP) under him, who were made responsible for the district. IG and the District Collector both,
representing the Civilian Authority, were made responsible for the SP.
Although the police department ranks and files were to be Indians, the officers were invariably to be
Europeans. In 1849, when it was defeated, the Sindh model was applied to Punjab, and later to Bombay in
1853 and Madras in 1859, albeit with different modifications.
To counter any political agitation, this model was found to be adequately suited. Military police and civilian
unarmed force, both subservient to the District Collector/civilian Magistrate's authority, were provided for
the system.
25
1