Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Languages
Assignment
Submitted by:
Shahraz Mushadi
Roll NO: 31466
Subject: FRM
Submitted to: Sir Nadeem
Class: MBA (3.5)4th Evening
Date: 15-05-2020
Content
Elaborate the following terms:
⮚ Market Risk Measurement Management
⮚ Operational risk
Factor-Sensitivity Measures
Basic factor-sensitivity measures offer a somewhat higher level of measurement
sophistication than nominal measures. As the name implies, these measures
gauge the sensitivity of the value of an instrument or portfolio to changes in a
primary risk factor. For example, the price value of a basis point change in yield
and the concept of duration are often used as factor-sensitivity measures in
assessing the interest-rate risk of fixed-income instruments and portfolios. Beta,
or the measure of the systematic risk of equities, is often considered a first-order
sensitivity measure of the change in an equity-related instrument or portfolio to
changes in broad equity indexes.
Duration provides a useful illustration of a factor-sensitivity measure. Duration
measures the sensitivity of the present value or price of a financial instrument
with respect to a change in interest rates. By calculating the weighted average
duration of the instruments held in a portfolio, the price sensitivity of different
instruments can be aggregated using a single basis that converts nominal
positions into an overall price sensitivity for that portfolio. These portfolio
durations can then be used as the primary measure of interest-rate risk exposure.
Alternatively, institutions can express the basic price sensitivities of their holdings
in terms of one representative instrument. Continuing the example using duration,
an institution may convert its positions into the duration equivalents of one
reference instrument such as a four-year U.S. Treasury, three-month Eurodollar,
or some other common financial instrument. For example, all interest-rate risk
exposures might be converted into a dollar amount of a ‘‘two-year’’ U.S. Treasury
security. The institution can then aggregate the instruments and evaluate the risk
as if the instruments were a single position in the common base.
While basic factor-sensitivity measures can provide useful insights, they do have
certain limitations—especially in measuring the exposure of complex instruments
and portfolios. For example, they do not assess an instrument’s convexity or
volatility and can be difficult to understand outside of the context of market
events. Examiners should ensure that factor sensitivity measures are used
appropriately and, where necessary, supported with more sophisticated measures
of market-risk exposure.
To comply with the more stringent regulatory requirements and absorb the higher
capital costs for credit risk, many banks are overhauling their approaches to credit
risk. But banks who view this as strictly a compliance exercise are being short-
sighted. Better credit risk management also presents an opportunity to greatly
improve overall performance and secure a competitive advantage.
Challenges to Successful Credit Risk Management
Inefficient data management. An inability to access the right data when it’s
needed causes problematic delays.
No group wide risk modeling framework. Without it, banks can’t generate
complex, meaningful risk measures and get a big picture of group wide risk.
Constant rework. Analysts can’t change model parameters easily, which
results in too much duplication of effort and negatively affects a bank’s
efficiency ratio.
Insufficient risk tools. Without a robust risk solution, banks can’t identify
portfolio concentrations or re-grade portfolios often enough to effectively
manage risk.
Cumbersome reporting. Manual, spreadsheet-based reporting processes
overburden analysts and IT.
Better model management that spans the entire modeling life cycle.
Real-time scoring and limits monitoring.
Robust stress-testing capabilities.
Data visualization capabilities and business intelligence tools that get
important information into the hands of those who need it, when they need it.
Operational risk
Operational risk is "the risk of a change in value caused by the fact that actual
losses, incurred for inadequate or failed internal processes, people and
systems, or from external events, differ from the expected losses".
One area that may involve operational risk is the maintenance of necessary
systems and equipment. If two maintenance activities are required, but it is
determined that only one can be afforded at the time, making the choice to
perform one over the other alters the operational risk depending on which
system is left in disrepair. If a system fails, the negative impact is associated
directly with the operational risk.
Other areas that qualify as operational risk tend to involve the personal
element within the organization. If a sales-oriented business chooses to
maintain a subpar sales staff, due to its lower salary costs or any other factor,
this behavior is considered an operational risk. The same can be said for failing
to properly maintain a staff to avoid certain risks. In a manufacturing
company, for example, choosing not to have a qualified mechanic on staff, and
having to rely on third parties for that work, can be classified as an operational
risk. Not only does this impact the smooth functioning of a system, but it also
involves additional time delays.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is a financial risk that for a certain period of time a given financial
asset, security or commodity cannot be traded quickly enough in the market
without impacting the market price.
(1) Prospectively assess the need for funds to meet obligations and
(2) Ensure the availability of cash or collateral to fulfill those needs at the
appropriate time by coordinating the various sources of funds available to the
institution under normal and stressed conditions.
Liquidity gap
Culp defines the liquidity gap as the net liquid assets of a firm. The excess value of
the firm's liquid assets over its volatile liabilities. A company with a negative
liquidity gap should focus on their cash balances and possible unexpected changes
in their values.
As a static measure of liquidity risk it gives no indication of how the gap would
change with an increase in the firm's marginal funding cost.
Elasticity
Culp denotes the change of net of assets over funded liabilities that occurs when
the liquidity premium on the bank's marginal funding cost rises by a small
amount as the liquidity risk elasticity. For banks this would be measured as a
spread over labor, for nonfinancial the LRE would be measured as a spread over
commercial paper rates.
Problems with the use of liquidity risk elasticity are that it assumes parallel
changes in funding spread across all maturities and that it is only accurate for
small changes in funding spreads.
Bid-offer spread
The bid-offer spread is used by market participants as an asset liquidity measure.
To compare different products, the ratio of the spread to the product's bid price
can be used. The smaller the ratio the more liquid the asset is.
This spread is composed of operational, administrative, and processing costs as
well as the compensation required for the possibility of trading with a more
informed trader.
Market depth
Hachmeister refers to market depth as the amount of an asset that can be
bought and sold at various bid-ask spreads. Slippage is related to the concept of
market depth. Knight and Satchell mention a flow trader needs to consider the
effect of executing a large order on the market and to adjust the bid-ask spread
accordingly. They calculate the liquidity cost as the difference of the execution
price and the initial execution price.
Immediacy
Immediacy refers to the time needed to successfully trade a certain amount of an
asset at a prescribed cost.
Resilience
Hachmeister identifies the fourth dimension of liquidity as the speed with which
prices return to former levels after a large transaction. Unlike the other measures,
resilience can only be determined over a period of time, i.e., resilience is the
capacity to recover.
Risks can come from various sources including uncertainty in financial markets,
threats from project failures (at any phase in design, development, production,
or sustaining of life-cycles), legal liabilities, credit risk, accidents, natural
causes and disasters, deliberate attack from an adversary, or events of
uncertain or unpredictable root-cause. There are two types of events i.e.
negative events can be classified as risks while positive events are classified as
opportunities. Risk management standards have been developed by various
institutions, including the Project Management Institute, the National Institute
of Standards and Technology, actuarial societies, and ISO standards. Methods,
definitions and goals vary widely according to whether the risk management
method is in the context of project management, security, engineering,
industrial processes, financial portfolios, actuarial assessments, or public
health and safety.
For example, one study found that one in six IT projects were "black swans"
with gigantic overruns (cost overruns averaged 200%, and schedule overruns
70%).
Investment Management
The term most often refers to managing the holdings within an investment
portfolio, and the trading of them to achieve a specific investment objective.
Investment management is also known as money management, portfolio
management, or wealth management.
Professional investment management aims to meet particular investment
goals for the benefit of clients whose money they have the responsibility of
overseeing. These clients may be individual investors or institutional investors
such as pension funds, retirement plans, governments, educational institutions,
and insurance companies.