Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Manjit Singh Joginder Kaur Reply

    Uploaded by

    warwithinjustice
    9 views2 pages
    This document is a reply to a partition application regarding Khewat no. 32/31. It raises two preliminary objections: 1) That the partition should be effected by equal sharing of the land to give each shareholder equal value and area. 2) That land abutting passages/roads should be allotted according to shareholding. On the merits, it agrees with paragraphs 1, 2 and 4-5 of the application but denies paragraph 3, asserting that partition should be by equal sharing. It prays that the partition be effected by equal sharing of equal value land to each shareholder and equal frontage, with passages drawn from common areas. The contents are verified by the respondents to

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a reply to a partition application regarding Khewat no. 32/31. It raises two preliminary objections: 1) That the partition should be effected by equal sharing of the land to give each shareholder equal value and area. 2) That land abutting passages/roads should be allotted according to shareholding. On the merits, it agrees with paragraphs 1, 2 and 4-5 of the application but denies paragraph 3, asserting that partition should be by equal sharing. It prays that the partition be effected by equal sharing of equal value land to each shareholder and equal frontage, with passages drawn from common areas. The contents are verified by the respondents to

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Manjit Singh Joginder Kaur Reply

    Uploaded by

    warwithinjustice
    This document is a reply to a partition application regarding Khewat no. 32/31. It raises two preliminary objections: 1) That the partition should be effected by equal sharing of the land to give each shareholder equal value and area. 2) That land abutting passages/roads should be allotted according to shareholding. On the merits, it agrees with paragraphs 1, 2 and 4-5 of the application but denies paragraph 3, asserting that partition should be by equal sharing. It prays that the partition be effected by equal sharing of equal value land to each shareholder and equal frontage, with passages drawn from common areas. The contents are verified by the respondents to

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    In the Hon’ble Court of Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Pathankot

    Re: Manjit Singh Versus Joginder Kaur & others

    ( Partition Application For Khewat no. 32/31)

    Reply to application on behalf of respondent no. 1 to 2.

    Sir,

    Respectfully submit:

    Preliminary Objections:

    1. That the partition is liable to be effected by equal share (KABJA TOD KE)
    with equal value of the land to each share holder.
    2. That land abutting passage/phirni/road be allotted to parties as per their
    share.
    On Merits:

    1. Para 1 of the application is correct that the suit land is joint between the
    replying respondents as well as applicants.
    2. Para 2 of the application is correct.
    3. Para 2 of the application is absolutely incorrect and hence denied. It is
    absolutely incorrect that respondents put the matter pending with one
    pretext with other. It is asserted that the suit land is liable to be
    partitioned by equal share (KABJA TOD KE) with equal value of the
    land to each share holder.

    4. Para 4 of the application is legal.


    5. Para 5 of the application is legal.

    It is therefore prayed that the partition may kindly be effected by equal share
    (KABJA TOD KE) with equal value of the land to each share holder and equal
    frontage as per share of the parties and passages be drawn from the common pool.
    Verified that the contents of the Respondent no 1 and 2
    above application are true and
    Joginder Kaur W/o Sardool Singh
    correct to the best of my
    knowledge and belief. Gurpreet Kaur D/o Sardool Singh

    Verified at:- Pathankot Both residents of Village- Ladpalwan


    Teshil & District Pathankot
    Date:-26-10-2023

    Through counsel

    You might also like