Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Berkan 1991
Berkan 1991
57(1991)
(25—30°C). The dried plants were roughly cut and ground to pow-
Abstract der. The weighed powder (230 g) was macerated with distilled
Analgesic activity basic body temperatures. The temperatures of the same animals
were recorded 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4h after DNP administration. The
The analgesic activity of the extract was assessed maximum hyperthermia of DNP was observed 0.5 h after its injec-
in two well established models, the writhing syndrome of the tion, therefore, the extract was administered to the animals in dif-
mouse and the hotplate test. ferent concentrations i.p. 0.5 h after DNP injection. The rectal body
temperatures of the animals were recorded at the same time inter-
In the first model the writhing syndrome was eli- vals mentioned above.
cited by i.p. injection of 3% acetic acid at the dose level of 300 mgI
kg (10 mi/kg), 30 and 60 mm after 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100mg ip. in- In the third model, d-amphetamine sulphate was
jection of the extract. The number of writhes were noted for the administered i.p. to rats fasted for 12 h in a dosage of 10mg/kg (9).
10 mm period between 5 and 15 mm after acetic acid injections (5). The continuation of the test procedure and the temperature mea-
surement time intervals were as in DNP hyperthermia.
In the other model, the analgesic activity was
tested in mice (20—30 g) with the hotplate method (53.5°C), 30 and Results and Discussion
60mm after 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100mg i.p. injection of the extract.
The time when the aminals licked either of their hindpaws was ac- Antiinflammatory effects
cepted as end-point. The cut- off time was 60 sec (6).
The results of the air-pouch granuloma
Antipyretic activity bioassay procedure are given in Table 1. In spite of the ad-
vantages and the disadvantages of the method for evaluat-
The antipyretic effect of the extract was tested in
ing topically applied antiinflammatory preparations as dis-
a No. of rats.
Change in body weight from initial weight.
** Difference (P < 0.01) from controls;' = difference (P < 0.05( from controls.
36 Planta Med. 57(1991) Tayfun Berkan eta!.
Difference (p <0.05) from adjuvant control;• Difference (p <0.01) from adjuvant control, (n = 6).
°C± SE.
Treatment Dose
Initial 0.5h 1.Oh 2.Oh 3.Oh 4.Oh
2,4-Dinitrophenol
(control) 20mg/kg 36.8 0.19 39.3 0.12 39.0 0.13 38.5 0.15 38.1 0.14 37.5 0.21
Extract 1mg 37.0 0.07 — 39.8 0.06 38.7 0.05 38.5 0.04 38.3 0.05
Extract 5mg 37.0 0.02 — 39.1 0.05 38.5 0.05 38.3 0.06 38.1 0.04
Extract 10mg 36.9 0.04 — 39.3 0.06 38.3 0.08 38.2 0.07 38.1 0.05
Extract 50mg 36.9 0.06 — 38.4 0.04* 38.1 0.05* 37.5 0.02' 37.1 0.03
Extract 100mg 36.9 0.06 — 38.1 0.10* 37.6 0.07' 37.2 0.02* 37.0 0.01'
* Difference from DNP control (p <0.05), )n = 9).
°C±S.E.
Treatment Dose
Initial 0.5h 1.Oh 2.Oh 3.Oh 4.Oh
Amphetamine (control) 10 mg/kg 36.8 0.15 38.9 0.20 39.7 0.20 38.9 0.16 37.7 0.09 37.5 0.07
Extract 1.0mg 37.0 0.07 — 39.3 0.09 39.0 0.05 38.2 0.08 37.6 0.07
Extract 5.0mg 36.9 0.03 — 39.1 0.09 38.3 0.08' 38.0 0.05 37.8 0.08
Extract 10 mg 36.5 0.08 — 39.8 0.12 38.5 0.34 38.0 0.05 37.5 0.07
Extract 50 mg 37.0 0.05 — 39.2 0.06' 38.3 0.06' 37.7 0.09 37.0 0.01'
Extract 100 mg 36.8 0.02 — 38.8 0.04' 38.0 0.02 37.2 0.05' 37.0 0.02'
Difference (p <0.05) from amphetamine control, (n = 9).
2,4-Dinitrophenol 36.9 0.40 39.9 0.18 39.3 0.19 39.1 0.16 39.0 0.41 38.7 0.17
Amphetamine 36.5 0.27 39.3 0.26 39.5 0.31 38.9 0.48 38.0 0.17 36.9 0.18
The extract (100 mg) was given i.p. 30 mm before DNP and amphetamine, (n = 9).