Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/267589110
CITATIONS READS
4 3,385
5 authors, including:
Khodayar Javadi
Sharif University of Technology
59 PUBLICATIONS 501 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
1-Quantitative interfacial transport properties (Dynamic IFT, Interfacial rehology of proteins, surfactants, polymers and nanoparticle mixtures ) 2-Nanoparticle protein
interaction 3- Smart water EOR 4- Novel insitue molecular membrane encapsulation View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Aliyar Javadi on 27 July 2016.
IMECE2006-15671
In other words, the total gas mole flow rate out of the reactor
The sum of CH4 and C2H2 in the reactor exhaust (dry basis) (on dry basis) for this case study can be estimated from:
is typically around 1% (Table 2 and 3), therefore these two
compounds can be safely eliminated in Eq. 3 from the
(gasflow)out = GMV* (gasflow)in
stoichimetry, i.e. w ≈ 0 .
= 1.13 × (0.0803 + 0.0048) = 0.085 kmol/s (8)
Both evaporation of the feed and the pyrolysis reaction are
endothermic. Therefore, to maintain the temperature in this
zone part of the furnace, oil is burnt according to the Then, total moles of the carbon dioxide out of reactor can be
following reaction. estimated:
(CO2 ) out = 0.05× 0.085 = 0.00425 kmol/s
C 22 H 20 + aO2 → bCO + cCO2 + dH 2 + eH 2 O (4)
Comparing this value with the carbon dioxide formed during
complete combustion of the fuel, i.e. through Eqns. 1 and 2,
Because of insufficient oxygen and with the presence of
the fresh carbon powder in bulk flow, formation of water in
this reaction is negligible [4], then c ≈ 0, e ≈ 0 . In other (CO 2 ) precombust or = 1.1 × (input fuel ) = 0.005 3 kmol/s
words, exclusion of CO2 and H2O in reactions 4 can be
assumed due to the oxygen deficient condition and the fact reveals that there is no noticeable carbon dioxide production
that the following endothermic reactions are favored in the during pyrolysis which confirms c ≈ 0 in Eq. (4).
prevailing high temperature condition. Similarly, the carbon monoxide concentration in the tail gas is
C + CO 2 → 2CO (5) around 12.7% on dry basis which compares well with the
typical values reported in Tables 2 and 3. Finally, the
CO + H 2 O → CO 2 + H 2 (6) percentage of hydrogen in the output stream is determined as
21.13 % on dry basis which is close to the upper range given
One can observe that the overall transformation is in Table 2. However, it is larger than the typical value in Table
accompanied by an increase in the number of moles. It should 3. One should note that some portion of this hydrogen is in the
Qoil −V = ∫
T2
T1
(0.336 + 4.73 *10 T )dT + Q
−4
λ (15)
45
40
35
30
25
3 4 5 6 7 8
AIR/OIL
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Authors would like to show their appreciation to Staff of
Doodeh Sanati Pars (D.S.P) Carbon Black Company, for their
helpful in access to some Industrial Data.
REFERENCES
1. J. J. Ivie, L. J. Forney, A numerical model of the
synthesis of carbon black by benzene pyrolysis,
AIChE J. vol. 34, No. 11, 1988. 1831-1820.
2. J. B. Donnet, R. C. Bansal, M. -J. Wang, eds, Carbon
Black Science and Technology, Marcel Dekker, New
York, 1993.
3. E. M. Dannenberg, L. Paquin, H. Gwinnel, Carbon
(carbon black) in J. Kroschwitz, M Howe-Grant, eds.