Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Popcycle Maryarmas
Popcycle Maryarmas
Program
Pre/Observation/Post Cycle Form (POP)
Revised 4.20.17
Directions for Preparation for POP Cycle
1. New Teacher (NT) and Mentor (ME) identify date for lesson observation and set dates/times for pre- and post-observation conferences.
2. Minimum three days before lesson delivery, NT prepares POP Cycle Form.
3. NT completes Section 1: New Teacher Information, lesson plan, and Section 2, Part A NT Reflection .
4. NT emails POP Cycle Form and Lesson Plan to ME.
Directions for Pre-Observation
5. Minimum 48 hours before lesson delivery, ME reviews Lesson Plan and Section 2, Part A: New Teacher Reflection; completes Section 2, Part B: ME Feedback.
6. ME shares feedback with NT during pre-observation conference. Lesson plan is adjusted as needed and finalized for delivery.
Directions for Observation and Preparation for Post-Observation Conference
7. During lesson delivery, ME completes Section 3A: ME Observation of Lesson Delivery, noting both Teacher Actions and Student Actions.
8. Prior to Post-Observation Conference, NT reflects on lesson outcomes and completes Part 3B: NT Reflection on Lesson Delivery.
Post Observation Conference Directions:
9. Within 48 hours, NT and ME share notes; discuss lesson observations and outcomes; complete Section 4. All parts should be transcribed into one document and submitted to course instructor. Information is used for
ILP.
Section 1: New Teacher Information
New Teacher Email Subject Area Grade Level
Transitional
Mary Armas Marmas@bousd.us Math
Kindergarten
Mentor Email School/District Date
Rachel Fessler RFessler@bousd.us Mariposa-Brea 10/9/22
Content Standard Lesson Objectives Unit Topic Lesson Title
1.4, 1.5 (Preschool Learning Foundations) CCSS-C.C.B.4
a-b CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.K.CC.B.4
Understand the relationship between numbers and
quantities; connect counting to cardinality.
Math: Number Pumpkin seed -number
https://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/cd/re/documents/preschoollf.pdf 1:1 Correspondence
sense, cardinality sense 1-5
ELD K.1.A.1 Exchanging information and ideas with others
through oral collaborative conversations on a range of social
and academic topics
CSTP Element(s) Focus for POP Cycle (In semesters 2, 3, 4, copy pertinent elements from ILP for POP Cycle focus.)
1 - Emerging 2 - Exploring 3 - Applying 4 - Integrating 5 – Innovating
NT pedagogical skills are newly formed and just coming into prominence Skills are developing as NT Skills are applied as NT Skills are refined as NT Skills are polished as NT
investigates and examines makes increased relevant and combines elements into a expands ability to add new
pedagogical practices suitable use of pedagogical cohesive and unified methods and strategies into
choices pedagogical repertoire pedagogical repertoire
Initial Rating Description (Identify both teacher and student rating
CSTP Element
Rating for CSTP 1 and 2.)
“Establishes procedures, routines, or norms
Employing classroom routines, procedures, norms, for single lessons to support student learning.
2.6 and supports for positive behavior to ensure a Emerging Responds to disruptive behavior. Students
climate in which all students can learn. are aware of procedures, routines, and
classroom norms.”
Explore using additional real-life
connections to subject matter in single
lessons or sequence of lessons to support
understanding.
Connecting subject matter to meaningful, real-life
1.3 Exploring
contexts
Students make use of real-life connections
provided in single lessons or sequence of
lessons to support understanding of subject
matter.
Section 2: Pre-Observation Conference
Focus Student 2: Student
Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 3: Your Choice
w/ILP/504
Student Female 5yrs-New student Student Male 5.7yrs . Student Male, EL
Focus Students who enrolled late in the year. She Recently moved from learner advanced
● Summarize critical needs and how you will address them during this understands some English, but Kindergarten to TK due 4.11yrs. This student is
lesson.
mostly speaks Tamil and returned to academic and social incredibly bright and
from India only a few weeks ago. development. He is will often speed
She has just been tested for ELPAC. currently on our SST through his work if it is
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 1 of 8
and we are waiting for results. She list, and we are working not rigorous enough
enjoys learning and has great fine on getting him services. for him. I will focus on
motor skills. I will use visual aids He is a tactile learner so differentiating his
during the lesson to help her we will be using several learning during our
understand concepts. And directions hands-on approaches to table time/centers. I
during our lesson. help him be more will expand his 1:1
successful. Correspondence
activities to include
numbers up to 20.
Part A: NT Reflection Part B: ME Feedback
Use questions to guide reflection on the Provide feedback on lesson plan
lesson plan. reflection.
I will be focusing on students’
understanding of cardinality and
learning how to accurately count to 5
using manipulatives to represent the
number as they say it. I am using
table time rotations to give students
independent opportunities to express Kindergarten begins our math
the numbers 1-5 using several with one to one correspondence,
different strategies. I don’t want to with numbers to 5. We teach
overwhelm my newer students with modeling with five frames and
Inquiry Focus/Special Emphasis the rotations, and I might keep Focus then work up to 10 frames. We
● What is your inquiry focus and/or special emphasis?
● How will you incorporate the inquiry focus and/or special emphasis into the lesson? student 1 and 2 at the teacher station work on correct number
● What specific feedback do you want from your ME? a bit longer to ensure they are formation and different ways to
confident before they move on to the make 5. Focusing on counting
next center. Specific feedback: I and cardinality to 5 in TK is a
would like to see how Kindergarten good basis for where we begin
starts their unit, since I don’t have a in kindergarten.
school provided curriculum, I want to
ensure I am giving them enough
direct instruction before giving them
more independent work or using
worksheets that require significant
teacher direction.
For my focus student 2: Since the
student does not understand 1:1
correspondence yet and can only rote
count to 3, how can I modify this so
Focus student 2: Try scaffolding
that he is more successful. Should I
the instruction with
limit his place card and counting
Inquiry Focus/Students manipulatives and one on one
● What specific feedback regarding your focus students do you want from your ME? beads to the number 3 as a target
support.
goal?
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 4 of 8
I will close the lesson with a game. I
will say a number and hold up a
number card, the students must grab
the correct number of counting bears
Closure and place them on their place card on
● How will you close your lesson? the table and then sit crisscross
● How will you assess student learning and prepare them for the next lesson?
applesauce on the carpet for me to
check their answer. This will allow
me to assess each student’s
knowledge and prepare them to move
on to larger numerical numbers.
Section 3: Observation of Lesson Delivery
Part 3A: ME Observation of Lesson Delivery Part 3B: NT Reflection on
Teacher Actions Student Actions Lesson Delivery
Student groups answered worksheet questions
Students completed the worksheets and were
that included all levels of Bloom’s (“Identify 6
able to ask questions. Most groups needed
EXAMPLE When teacher reviewed worksheet, she asked additional questions of analysis problem-solving strategies; pick two strategies
revisions for their questions;
CSTP 1: Engaging All Students and evaluation (“which problem-solving strategy do you prefer? How could and identify at least one similarity and one
comparison/contrast was the most common
● In what ways were students engaged? you create a math problem that could be solved with this strategy?”) difference between them”). Groups then
analysis question. I need to give them a
selected a strategy and created two math
Bloom’s question stems handout next time.
problems to exchange tomorrow.
A couple students
struggled with the fine
motor aspects of the tasks
because they are still
developing these skills.
Section 4: Post Observation Conference
To what degree did students achieve lesson objectives? All students were able to consistently meet this lesson objective.
Focus Student 2: Student
Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 3: Your Choice
w/ILP/504
Student was able to model and count Using student preferred Student was adequately
To what degree did focus students achieve lesson objectives?
up to 5 without support or additional materials, he was able to challenged and able to
prompting. She was able to model numbers 1-5 model numbers
communicate accurately. accurately up to 25.
I would change how I created the independent learning centers, so they would not need to
have as much teacher interaction to prove their knowledge. I would instead create a center
What would you do differently next time? rotation with each set of materials available to the students and I would move from table to
table instead of having the students interrupt the teacher table center. That way I could
check for understanding without having to constantly stop and check their work.
1. The lesson was developmentally appropriate and challenging for each student
based on their content understanding.
2. Students were given multiple opportunities using different modalities to show their
What were three top Lesson Strengths? understanding.
3. Behavior management was not an issue because the teacher has developed
appropriate classroom management style, procedures and provides consistency.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 7 of 8
1. Teacher center: Fine motor tweezers addition caused some students difficulty, and
had seeds flying across the table causing distractions. Provide options that are
more appropriate.
What were three top areas for improvement?
2. Independent tables were moderately successful. However, students finished very
quickly and didn’t have access to more materials without teachers' help. Provide
more materials for early finishers.
3. I would provide more procedures for the center time rotations to reduce
interruptions.
What are next steps? Students will continue to improve number sense for numbers 6-10.
Other Comments/Notes
All parts of this form should be transcribed (typed; not hand-written) into a single document and submitted to course instructor.
Information from this POP Cycle should be summarized on the NT ILP as appropriate.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 8 of 8