Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Psychology
On This Page:
1. Structuralist School of Thought
3. Titchener’s Structuralism
4. Influence on Psychology
Take-home Messages
Structuralism is a theory of consciousness that seeks to analyze the elements of mental
experiences, such as sensations, mental images, and feelings, and how these elements combine
to form more complex experiences.
Structuralism was founded by Wilhelm Wundt, who used controlled methods, such as
introspection,to break down consciousness to its basic elements without sacrificing any of the
properties of the whole.
https://www.simplypsychology.org/structuralism.html 1/8
28/11/2023, 06:11 What Is Structuralism In Psychology?
Structuralism is considered the first school of thought in psychology, and was established in
Germany by Wilhelm Wundt, and mainly associated with Edward B. Titchener.
Structuralism looked to examine the adult mind in terms of analyzing the basic elements of
thoughts and sensations, and afterward to discover the manner by which these segments fit
together in complex structures.
Wundt’s aim was to record thoughts and sensations, and to analyze them into their constituent
elements, in much the same way as a chemist analyses chemical compounds, in order to get at the
underlying structure. The school of psychology founded by Wundt is known as voluntarism, the
process of organizing the mind.
Wundt’s theory was developed and promoted by his one-time student, Edward Titchener (1898),
who described his system as Structuralism, or the analysis of the basic elements that constitute
the mind.
Introspection is the process by which a person looks inward at their own mental
processes to gain insight into how they work. It is the self-observation of one’s
consciousness.
Wundt’s introspection was not a casual affair, but a highly practiced form of self-examination. He
trained psychology students to make observations that were biased by personal interpretation or
previous experience, and used the results to develop a theory of conscious thought.
Highly trained assistants would be given a stimulus such as a ticking metronome and would
reflect on the experience. They would report what the stimulus made them think and feel. The
same stimulus, physical surroundings and instructions were given to each person.
https://www.simplypsychology.org/structuralism.html 2/8
28/11/2023, 06:11 What Is Structuralism In Psychology?
Titchener trained his students to become skilled at trained introspection, and to report only the
sensations as they were experienced without reliance on “meaning words”, which he called a
stimulus error.
Using this approach, Titchener’s students reported various visual, auditory, tactile, etc
experiences: In An Outline of Psychology (1899), he reported over 44,000 elements of sensation,
including 32,820 Visual, 11,600 Auditory, and 4 Taste.
Titchener’s Structuralism
He suggested these components could be dissected into their unique properties, which he
identified as quality, intensity, duration, clearness, and extensity.
https://www.simplypsychology.org/structuralism.html 3/8
28/11/2023, 06:11 What Is Structuralism In Psychology?
Pictures and expressions of warmth could be separated further into just bunches of sensations. It
can therefore be concluded that by following this train of reasoning, all of the thoughts in
question were pictures, which, being developed from rudimentary sensations, implied that all
perplexing thinking and thought could, in the end, be separated into simply the sensations which
he could get at through introspection.
Interaction of Elements
The second issue in Titchener’s hypothesis of structuralism was the topic of how the psychological
components consolidated and interfaced with one another to shape any conscious experience.
Titchener dismissed Wundt’s ideas of apperception and innovative blend (intentional activity),
which were the premise of Wundt’s voluntarism. Titchener contended that consideration was
essentially a sign of the “clearness” property inside sensation.
Specifically, Titchener was keen on the connection between the physical process and the
conscious experience – he wanted to discover specifically what was responsible for most of the
interactions between them.
Titchener accepted that physiological cycles give a nonstop foundation that gives mental cycles a
coherence they in any case would not have. As a result, the sensory system doesn’t cause any form
of conscious experience, yet can be utilized to clarify a few attributes of mental occasions.
Influence On Psychology
Despite the fact that structuralism spoke to the development of psychology as a field separate
from reasoning, the basic school lost significant impact when Titchener eventually passed away.
Over the years Titchener’s approach using introspection became more rigid and limited. By
today’s scientific standards, the experimental methods used to study the structures of the mind
were too subjective; the use of introspection led to a lack of reliability in results.
https://www.simplypsychology.org/structuralism.html 4/8
28/11/2023, 06:11 What Is Structuralism In Psychology?
Other critics argue that structuralism was too concerned with internal behavior, which is not
directly observable and cannot be accurately measured.
Also, because introspection itself is a conscious process it must interfere with the consciousness it
aims to observe.
The development drove, nonetheless, to the advancement of a few countermovements that would
in general respond firmly to European patterns in the field of exploratory psychology.
Conduct and character were past the degree considered by structuralism. In isolating significance
from current realities of involvement, structuralism contradicted the phenomenological
convention of Franz Brentano’s demonstration psychology and Gestalt psychology, just as the
functionalist school and John B. Watson’s behaviorism.
References
Titchener, E. B. (1898). The postulates of a structural psychology. The Philosophical Review, 7
(5), 449-465.
Further Reading
Leahey, T. H. (1981). The mistaken mirror: On Wundt’s and Titchener’s psychologies. Journal of
the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 17(2), 273-282.
Leahey, T. H. (1981). The mistaken mirror: On Wundt’s and Titchener’s psychologies. Journal of
the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 17(2), 273-282.
Titchener, E. B. (1921). Wilhelm Wundt. The American Journal of Psychology, 32(2), 161-178.
FAQs
https://www.simplypsychology.org/structuralism.html 5/8
28/11/2023, 06:11 What Is Structuralism In Psychology?
The goal was to break down mental processes into their most basic elements, such as sensations
and feelings, to understand how they combine to create complex experiences.
Reviewer Author
Saul Mcleod, Ph.D., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years experience of working in
further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the
Journal of Clinical Psychology.
https://www.simplypsychology.org/structuralism.html 6/8
28/11/2023, 06:11 What Is Structuralism In Psychology?
CONTACT
We are committed to engaging with you and taking action based on your suggestions,
complaints, and other feedback.
contact@simplypsychology.org
CATEGORIES
Psychology
Self-Care
Relationships
OUR STAFF
Saul Mcleod
Florence Yeung
Ioanna Stavraki
Haddi Browne
Olivia Guy-Evans
https://www.simplypsychology.org/structuralism.html 7/8
28/11/2023, 06:11 What Is Structuralism In Psychology?
Julia Simkus
Anna Drescher
Karina González
https://www.simplypsychology.org/structuralism.html 8/8