Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jessica Smith
Towson University
Dr. McGinn
December 7, 2021
Introduction:
When deciding what type of article to complete a review upon for this project I knew that
I wanted to take a closer look at research that has been recently conducted which involve studies
directly related to the COVID-19 Pandemic and student achievement. While reviewing the list of
articles that Dr. McGinn suggested to us, I was happy to see that a group of authors (Kuhfeld et
al) had published an article in November of 2020 which was comparing achievement gaps to the
selected article is: Projecting the potential impact of COVID-19 school closures on academic
achievement. I chose to focus on this topic because as educators, including myself, we are living
this reality daily, and I wanted to take a closer look at the findings and conclusions being drawn
Slide” I continue to be interested in the findings that researchers have taken the time to closely
dissect and interpret using mathematical statistics. Thus, making the article recent, relatable, and
reputable.
Research Background:
13, 2020. On this day, students were sent home from school and told they would return after two
weeks, however students never returned to their classrooms in the 2019-2020 school year,
instead March became the new June: the end of the school year. Families were forced to “stop
the spread” and remain indoors, students were receiving instruction through digital devices, and
teachers and school staff were scrambling to activate emergency teaching strategies.
Kuhfeld et. al conducted a study to analyze how productive the three months of virtual
teaching were during these unprecedented times, where learning has gone from there, and how it
will be changed in the future school years to come. In their study, they selected four major areas
to explore: 1. Possible learning scenarios and patterns that evolved as a result from the abnormal
ending of the 2019-2020 school year, 2. The amount of variability in student learning rates
during that time, 3. Predictions of the correlations between out-of-school time and these learning
rates, and 4. Did the COVID-19 school closures affect achievement gaps in student groups.
Since a pandemic of this nature had never affected schools to this degree, researchers
chose to find patterns in instances that they could use for their research. These patterns included:
Summer slides, weather-related school closures, and absenteeism. In the article it was stated that
the reason this study was conducted was so that, “Teachers and schools [could] benefit from
knowing…how much lower achievement might [have been] when student[s] returned[ed] in
person, but also the number of variables there could be” (Kuhfeld et al, pp. 549-550).
The study under review was conducted using a sample of ~5 million students ranging
from grades 3-8, coming from ~19,000 U.S. schools. The sample includes 51% males, 47%
White, 17% Black, 4% Asian, and 18% Hispanic students. Also, these students completed
diagnostic testing in both Reading and Math using the MAP Growth Assessments during the
2017-2018 and 2018-2019 school years. All trends were studied and labeled using standard
deviations (SD).
To begin, seasonal learning, or summer vacation evaluations (or lack thereof) were
analyzed. The purpose of this group studying these seasonal patterns was to compare the
conclusions found between students and extensions of breaks. Thus, the closest extension of time
to compare the sudden extended COVID-19 Pandemic closures to was the school summer
vacation months. Previous educational studies have determined that, “achievement typically
slows/declines over the summer months; with math regression being steeper than those in
literacy.” However, during this study it was also found that “some students actually show
Inclement weather was the next factor to be closely identified. Here, a close focus was
placed upon snow days and an example was also made from the extended closure of schools that
were affected by Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Weather was the closest example that authors had to
explaining and showing trends between “unexpected, disrupted instruction”. In fact, Maryland’s
snow days were used as an example in the article, noting that MD snow days effect student
Absenteeism was next in the sequence. A comparison was made between low-income
students and their peers, noting that low-income students generally tend to miss <10% of
instructional days each school year. Multiple grade-levels, schools, and demographic groups
All in all, a distinct assessment was conducted to detect the similarities and differences
between “regular” out-or-school time and the specific school closure days because of the
The biggest take away from this article’s findings is that there are a variety of external
factors that contributed to student success during the start of the COVID-19 educational recess,
where many continue to impact students during the 2021-2022 school year, daily. Some of these
factors include socioeconomic status (SES), race, cultural, community-based situations, and
Kuhlfeld et al helped to conclude that, “…only one in five school districts met the
American Enterprises Institute’s standards for ‘rigorous’ remote learning” (p. 552). This was due
to the fact that only 50% of low-income families were found to have a sufficient device at home
to access the distance learning tools. Furthermore, 73% of high-SES schools reported that
students were expected to receive remote learning to end the 2019-2020 school year, whereas
Educators and school staff need to continue to consider that economic and social impacts
continue to impact students and their families, even as we are moving closer to the ‘end’ of the
pandemic. Fears, job-loss, elevated stress, daily life disruptions, and isolation continue to be
daily realities for some families within our very own classrooms.
While this article seems as though it was written based many assumptions established
from the collection of authors, all their points continue to be valid and reputable. These authors
found that “student learning gains for the end of the 2019-2020 school year were projected to be
lower than typical predictions. Thus, students would be beginning the next school year (2020-
2021) with only 60-87% of their previous school year’s gains” (p. 556). Again, math
comprehension displayed evidence of larger impacts with an average of 37-50% gain, while
reading comprehension showed between 63-68% of gains. While this shouldn’t be a surprise to
educators that have been fluently teaching since pre-pandemic days, it is still refreshing to have
concrete statistics to show the “COVID Slide” on paper, the actions, complications, and
growth, partial absenteeism, COVID slide, and full absenteeism) many findings were
discovered. Some groups had an advantage during the virtual and hybrid learning models,
while other groups had clear disadvantages. See Figure C1 below for a visual
educate my fifth grades during the 2021-2022 school year. I know that students have experienced
loss in their curriculums, have larger achievement gaps, and that they have experienced outside
trauma(s). However, as large as the educational gaps may present themselves, they may just not
be as large as they are perceived to be. In fact, the classroom struggles may be presenting
themselves because they are more related to expected routines and procedures. With 60-87% of
learning gains presenting themselves between school years, students should have foundations to
help them build and digress throughout the course of the school year. While we know that we are
currently not back to “business as usual”, we are still educating with the hands we have all been
dealt, as we continue to cope, grieve, and change in our new post-pandemic lifestyles. Assessing
students early and frequently is what is going to best explain to educators where their students’
Kuhfeld, M., Soland, J., Tarasawa, B., Johnson, A., Ruzek, E., & Liu, J. (2020). Projecting the