Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Surface Roughness Methods - Lorentzen & Wettre
Surface Roughness Methods - Lorentzen & Wettre
All but the last of these methods are air-leak methods which indicate the roughness of a certain
paper surface by telling how much air passes between the edge of a measuring head and the
surface in question, under specified conditions. The PPS-method has a rather limited measuring
range and is mainly used for smooth grades e.g. for printing. The Bendtsen and Sheffield methods
are air-leak methods with a relatively wide measuring range. They have over the years been found
reliable, simple to use and good all around methods for determination of surface roughness on
many grades. The stylus roughness method uses an entirely different approach.
The first instrument of this type was designed by Dr Julius Bekk in 1927. His instrument was built
around a vacuum chamber. The result was presented as the time used for a certain reduction of the
under pressure due to leakage of air between an annular glass ring and the paper sample.
Bendtsen developed a sensing head in which the width of the ring is 0,15 mm. The rubber behind
the test piece, used in the Bekk instrument, is replaced by a glass plate. The pressure against the
paper is 98 kPa as in the Bekk instrument. The measuring results are expressed in terms of air-
flow rate, Bendtsen units, at a given differential pressure.
The Bendtsen method is an old and well known method but it is not the first air-leak method. In
1940, Mr C. Bendtsen, pointed out that the annular glass ring of the Bekk tester was much bigger
than the cavities in the paper surface.
The above instruments were used successfully for many years but in 1965 the time was due for a
new instrument, the PPS Tester, invented by Dr J.R. Parker. In this instrument the major drawbacks
of the earlier instruments had been eliminated. The measuring pressure is increased to 490–1960
kPa which corresponds with the actual nip pressure in a real printing press. The permeability error
was minimized by a unique design of the measuring head. Another unique feature was that the
instrument was calibrated in absolute units namely µm.
By redesigning the head and backing of the original PPS the PPS flex instrument has been greatly
improved. Roughness may be measured over a wider range, at lower clamping pressures and
without the spuriously high results previously obtained on papers more than 100 µm thick or with a
bending stiffness of more than a few mNm.
To overcome the PPS problems, changes were made to the backing and to the sensing head.
The PPS Flex is basically similar to the PPS. It gives similar readings at comparable clamping
pressures. Also, because the test piece is held flat, it may be used for both thick (stiff) and ordinary
papers. The new backing and head open new fascinating possibilities for understanding and
predicting the relation between surface roughness and the printing properties of paper.
Stylus Roughness
The stylus type measurement allows a great deal more information to be gathered about the paper
surface than does any air leakage measurement. The stylus system takes and records a stylus
vertical position every tenth of a mm it travels across the surface. This information is processed to
reflect printability numbers and the lower the number, the better the print quality.
The instrument records the vertical position of the stylus. The result is reported as Micro Average.
The Standard Deviation Number, which is basically a measure of the general roughness of the
profile closely follows most air leakage numbers.
Login