The document shows the results of three runs analyzing the concentration of components C1 through nC5 in parts per million (ppm) and calculates the percentage error from the nominal values. Run 1 and 2 were most accurate with errors generally under 2% and total values within 0.1% of nominal. Run 3 had higher errors, ranging from 0.3-0.9% with a total value 0.6% lower than nominal.
The document shows the results of three runs analyzing the concentration of components C1 through nC5 in parts per million (ppm) and calculates the percentage error from the nominal values. Run 1 and 2 were most accurate with errors generally under 2% and total values within 0.1% of nominal. Run 3 had higher errors, ranging from 0.3-0.9% with a total value 0.6% lower than nominal.
The document shows the results of three runs analyzing the concentration of components C1 through nC5 in parts per million (ppm) and calculates the percentage error from the nominal values. Run 1 and 2 were most accurate with errors generally under 2% and total values within 0.1% of nominal. Run 3 had higher errors, ranging from 0.3-0.9% with a total value 0.6% lower than nominal.