Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/matlet
Abstract
Hexagonal a-NiS nanocrystals and Ni3S4 nanoplates have been prepared by a colloidal chemical process in oleylamine. X-Ray diffraction
(XRD), transmission electron microscope (TEM), field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM), and X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS) were employed to characterize the products. The self-assembly hollow spheres by a-NiS nanocrystals are observed. XPS
study indicates that the products’ surface contains excess sulfur which would enhance the density of active sites on the catalyst surface for
hydrogenolysis process. Magnetization measurement indicates that the a-NiS and Ni3S4 are no longer antiferromagnetic; both of them show
paramagnetism due to the size effect.
D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
* Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +86 551 3601654. Organometallic precursor, nickel acetylacetone (Ni(acac)2),
E-mail address: chenxh@ustc.edu.cn (X.H. Chen). was prepared following the method reported previously
0167-577X/$ - see front matter D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2005.07.007
H.T. Zhang et al. / Materials Letters 59 (2005) 3728 – 3731 3729
2.3. Synthesis of Ni3S4 Fig. 2. (a) TEM image of the as-prepared a-NiS nanocrystals; (b) the self-
assembled hollow spheres of a-NiS nanocrystals. Inset of (a): SAED
2 mmol Ni(acac)2 and 12 mmol S were added to 20 mL pattern of the a-NiS nanocrystals.
degassed oleylamine under N2. The reaction mixture was
slightly stirred and heated at 180 -C for 3 h, resulting in a age inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrom-
black colloidal solution. The products were separated upon eter (ICP). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was
the addition of equal volume alcohol, and centrifuged. In the performed on a VGESCALAB MKII X-ray photoelectron
end, the products were washed using alcohol and carbon spectrometer, using nonmonochromatized Mg Ka X-rays as
sulfide for several times, and dried under vacuum at room the excitation source. The magnetic susceptibility measure-
temperature. ment in zero-field-cooling (ZFC) and field-cooling (FC)
process at an applied field of 1000 Gauss was carried out
2.4. Characterization with a superconducting quantum interference device
(SQUID) magnetometer (MPMS-5).
Field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM)
images were observed with a JSM-6700F field emission
scanning electron microscope. Transmission electron micro- 3. Results and discussions
scope (TEM) was conducted with a Hitachi H-800, high-
resolution (HR) TEM images and the corresponding Fig. 1a shows the XRD pattern of a-NiS, all the peaks can be
selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) were taken on a indexed as the hexagonal structure of a-NiS (JCPDS NO.75-0613).
JEOL-2010 high-resolution transmission electron micro- No impurities such as Ni, NiOx or other nickel sulfides are detected
in the XRD pattern. XRD pattern of Ni3S4 is shown in Fig. 1b. All
scope operating at 200 KV. Products were characterized by a
peaks can be indexed as the cubic structure (JCPDS NO 76-1813).
Rigaku D/max-A X-Ray diffractometer (XRD) with graph-
ite monochromatized CuKa1 radiation in the 2h range of
20- – 80- with the step of 0.02 degree at room temperature.
The composition was determined by the Atomscan Advant-
Fig. 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of the products: (a) a-NiS, (b) Ni3S4. Fig. 3. HRTEM images of the a-NiS nanocrystals.
3730 H.T. Zhang et al. / Materials Letters 59 (2005) 3728 – 3731
was employed to analyze the products’ surface. Fig. 5a shows the samples contain excess sulfur which would enhance the
Ni 2p3/2 core-level spectra of the samples. The binding energies of density of active sites on the catalyst surface for hydro-
Ni 2 p3/2 core-level for a-NiS and Ni3S4 are 853.4 and 854.3 eV, genolysis process. Magnetization measurement indicates
respectively, which are consistent with the reported value for that both the a-NiS and Ni3S4 nanoplates are no longer
NiS1 + x (Ni 2p3 in NiS 852.80 eV, in Ni2S3 854.30 eV). Fig. 5b
antiferromagnetic; both of them show paramagnetism due to
shows the S 2p core-level spectra of the two samples. The binding
the size effect. In addition, weak ferromagnetic interactions,
energies of S 2p for a-NiS and Ni3S4 are 162.0 and 162.5 eV,
respectively, consistent with the reported values (S 2p in NiS which arise from the increasing uncompensated surface
162.20 eV) [23]. It indicates that the binding energies of Ni 2p3/2 spins, exist in the a-NiS nanocrystals.
and S 2p for a-NiS are smaller than those for Ni3S4. The peak areas
of Ni 2p3/2 and S 2p give the Ni : S ratios of 1 : 1.79 and 1 : 1.5 for
a-NiS and Ni3S4, respectively. The results reveal that surfaces of Acknowledgements
a-NiS contain relatively more sulfur than that of Ni3S4 because the
size of a-NiS nanoparticles is much smaller. These results suggest This work was supported by the National Science
that the surface of both samples contains excess sulfur, which
foundation of China, and the Knowledge Innovation Project
would enhance the density of active sites on the catalyst surface for
of Chinese Academy of Sciences.
hydrogenolysis process [14].
The temperature dependences of magnetization measured under
the ZFC and FC processes at an applied field of 1000 Gauss are
shown in Fig. 6. Fig. 6a shows the temperature dependence of References
magnetization for the as-prepared a-NiS nanocrystals. The magnet-
ization of a-NiS increases with decreasing temperature in both [1] K.J. Klabunde, Nanoscale Materials in Chemistry, VCH, Weinheim,
ZFC and FC processes, indicating a paramagnetic behavior, in 2001.
contrast to antiferromagnetism for its bulk material. It suggests that [2] V.F. Puntes, K.M. Krishnan, A.P. Alivisatos, Science 291 (2001) 2115.
the long-range antiferromagnetic ordering was destroyed in the [3] X. Peng, L. Manna, W. Yang, J. Wickham, E. Scher, A. Kadavanich,
nanoscale materials. The paramagnetic behavior might arise from A.P. Alivisatos, Nature 404 (2000) 59.
[4] A.P. Alivisatos, Science 271 (1996) 933.
the so-called finite-size effect and/or modification of the bulk state
[5] M. Nirmal, B.O. Dabbousi, M.G. Bawendi, J.J. Macklin, J.K.
due to surface effect [24,25]. Compared to the magnetic behavior Trautman, T.D. Harris, L.E. Brus, Nature 383 (1996) 802.
of NiS bulk measured, the magnetization of the as-prepared a-NiS [6] S.H. Sun, C.B. Murray, D. Weller, L. Folks, A. Moser, Science 287
is six times larger than that of the bulk at room temperature [21]. In (2000) 1989.
addition, magnetization of the as-prepared nanoscale a-NiS is [7] C.M. Lieber, MRS Bull. 28 (2003) 486.
about five hundred times larger than that of bulk materials at 5K [8] C.B. Murray, C.R. Kagan, M.G. Bawedi, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 30
[21]. Such enhanced magnetization are often observed in nanoscale (2000) 545.
materials due to the size effect [26]. Inset of Fig. 6a shows the [9] H.T. Zhang, G. Wu, X.H. Chen, Langmuir 21 (2005) 4281.
magnetization versus applied magnetic field (M – H) curve for the [10] K.M. Abraham, J.E. Elliot, J. Electrochem. Soc. 131 (1984) 2211.
[11] O. Weisser, S. Landa, Sulfide catalysts, Their Properties and
as-prepared a-NiS nanocrystals. The hysteresis loop reveals that
Applications, Pergamon, Oxford, 1973, pp. 167 – 171.
the a-NiS nanoparticles have remanent magnetization of 0.00012
[12] H. Vandenborre, Ph. Vermeiren, R. Leysen, Electrochim. Acta. 29
emu/g, and coercivity of 155 Oe. The results indicate that there are (1984) 297.
some weak ferromagnetic interactions, which arise from the [13] W.M. Kriven, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71 (1988) 1021.
uncompensated spins in the surface due the larger ratio of surface [14] A. Olivas, J. Cruz-Reyes, V. Petranovskii, M. Avalos, S. Fuentes, J.
atoms to bulk atoms, exist at low temperature range. Anomalous Vac. Sci. Technol., A, Vac. Surf. Films 16 (1998) 3515.
magnetic properties were also observed on CoO and NiO nano- [15] R.D. Tilley, D.A. Jefferson, J. Phys. Chem., B 106 (2002) 10895.
particles [27,28]. The temperature dependence of magnetization, as [16] G. Kullerud, R.A. Yund, J. Petrol. 3 (1962) 126.
shown in Fig. 6b, for the as-prepared Ni3S4 nanoplates, shows the [17] H. Seim, H. Fjellvag, F. Groenvold, S. Stoelen, J. Solid State Chem.
similar behavior as a-NiS nanocrystals. No hysteresis is observed 121 (1996) 400.
[18] S. Stolen, H. Fjellvag, F. Gronvold, H. Seim, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 26
in the M – H curve as shown in the inset of Fig. 6b for Ni3S4
(1994) 987.
nanoplates. To our knowledge, there is no report on the magnetic
[19] N.H. Kolkmeijer, A.L. Th. Moesveld, Z. Kristallogr. 80 (1931) 91.
properties of bulk Ni3S4. Therefore, we cannot compare the [20] M. Laffite, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. (1959) 1211.
magnetization of the nanoplates to the bulk. [21] J.T. Sparks, T. Komoto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 752 (1968) 46.
[22] R.G. Charles, M.A. Pawlikowski, J. Phys. Chem. 62 (1958) 440.
[23] C.D. Wagner, Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Perkin-
Elmer, Minnesota, 1979.
4. Conclusion
[24] R.H. Kodama, S.A. Makhlouf, A.E. Berkowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79
(1997) 1393.
In summary, metastable hexagonal a-NiS nanocrystals [25] J. Park, E. Kang, S.U. Son, H.M. Park, M.K. Lee, J. Kim, K.W. Kim,
and two-dimensional Ni3S4 nanoplates were successfully H.J. Noh, J.H. Park, C.J. Bae, J.G. Park, T. Hyeon, Adv. Mater. 17
prepared through a colloidal chemical process. It is found (2005) 429.
that the composition and crystal structure can be tuned [26] X.H. Chen, H.T. Zhang, C.H. Wang, X.G. Luo, P.H. Li, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 81 (2002) 4419.
through the modulating Ni(acac)2 : S ratio. Interestingly, the [27] L. Zhang, D. Xue, C. Gao, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 267 (2003) 111.
self-assembly hollow spheres by a-NiS nanocrystals are [28] R.H. Kodama, S.A. Makhlouf, A.E. Berkowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79
observed. XPS study indicates that the surfaces of both (1997) 1393.