D-Day’s Historic Beaches Face a

New Onslaught: Rising Seas

As climate change speeds coastal erosion in France, can memory be preserved if the famous
landing sites of the Allied invasion disappear?

By Catherine Porter

Catherine Porter, based in Paris, spent three days traveling across the D- Day landing sites in
northern France to report this story.

• Published June 6, 2023Updated June 9, 2023

POINTE DU HOC, France — Even filled with grass and wildflowers, the craters remain so deep
and wide that you can still sense the blasts of bombs that carved them 79 years ago.
Listen to This Article
Listen 15:32

Open this article in the New York Times Audio app on iOS.
At the pockmarked entrance of an old German bunker, you can almost feel the rattle of machine-
gun fire. Peering over the 100-foot cliff to the ocean below, you see clearly how exposed the young
American men were as they climbed up grappling ropes early that morning of June 6, 1944.

Of all the D-Day sites, none quite conveys the horror and heroism of that pivotal moment during
World War II as the Pointe du Hoc.

But it is disappearing, fast.

The Nazi defense and lookout point between two landing beaches in Normandy, which American
Rangers conquered, suffered another three landslides this spring. Inspections revealed that waves
had chewed a cavity more than two and a half yards deep into their base.

“There is absolutely no doubt we are going to lose more of our cliff,” said Scott Desjardins, the
American Battle Monuments Commission’s superintendent of the site that receives an estimated
900,000 visitors annually. “We know we are not going to fight Mother Nature. What’s frightening
now, is the speed at which it is happening.”

Climate change and erosion are eating at the French coasts, raising gnawing questions about
property rights, safety and sustainable development. But along the northern ribbon of beaches and
cliffs in Normandy, where 150,000 Allied soldiers landed to confront machine guns and fascism,
history, memory and even identity are at risk too.

When the sites are gone, how will France recount to itself, and the rest of the world, the impact of
that moment? Alternatively, at what cost should they be saved?
“If I don’t have the site, I lose the history of what happened here,” said Mr. Desjardins, looking
down at frothy waves pounding into the cliffs. “You may as well stay at home on the couch and
read a book.”

A World War II memorial in Ste.-Marie-du-Mont. Built on the spot where American troops landed, it is now
threatened by coastal erosion.Credit...Andrea Mantovani for The New York Times
A defensive fighting position, called a Tobruk, that has fallen from the cliffs in Grandcamp-Maisy, around the coast
from Ste.-Marie-du-Mont.Credit...Andrea Mantovani for The New York Times

Even for a country with an official “memorial adviser” to the president, the 50-mile stretch that
witnessed the Allied arrival takes commemoration to an exultant level. The Normandy tourism
office lists more than 90 official D-Day sites, including 44 museums, drawing more than five
million visitors annually.

The edges of the country roads are decorated by tributary statues and banners flashing the faces of
Allied soldiers who died in the fight. Village squares are named June 6, main roads are labeled
“Libération” and tourist shops are packed with D-Day magnets and antique army paraphernalia.

All of that is threatened: Two-thirds of these coasts are already eroding, according to the
Normandy climate change report, and experts predict worse to come with the swelling sea levels,
increasing storms and higher tides heralded by climate change.

“The shore will go inland. We are sure of that,” said Stéphane Costa, a geography professor at
University of Caen, and a leading local expert on climate change.

The French government is already declaring defeat. After centuries of bracing against the ocean’s
outbursts with stony protections, it now pushes the principle of “living with the sea, not against it.”
Communities around the country’s edges, including a number along D-Day beaches, are working
on adaptation plans, which will include the prospect of moving.

For many, the idea of abandoning a site of such potent history is not acceptable.

“This is a symbolic place; It’s mythical,” said Charles de Vallavieille, standing on the shore of
Madeleine Beach, which, starting June 6, 1944, became known as “Utah.”
“Everyone must come here once in their life to understand what happened here,” said Mr. de
Vallavieille, the local mayor.
Image

Charles de Vallavieille, mayor of Ste.-Marie-du-Mont, looking over war remnants on Utah Beach.Credit...Andrea
Mantovani for The New York Times

The town of Arromanches-les-Bains. The Normandy tourism office lists more than 90 official D-Day sites, including
44 museums, drawing more than five million visitors annually.Credit...Andrea Mantovani for The New York Times
The farthest west of the five D-Day beaches, Utah Beach was quickly conquered by American
soldiers who then pushed inland to the central square of Ste.-Marie-du-Mont, where American
paratroopers — dropped in the night by plane — were already battling German soldiers.

“An American paratrooper hid in the recess behind this pump,” reads a sign over two water
faucets. “He held his rifle in the crook of his elbow, like a hunter,” it continues, firing at German
soldiers and killing around 10 of them.

Across the street, a large black-and-white photo of American soldiers praying during Mass hangs
by the entrance of the village’s 11th-century church.

Like many residents, Mr. de Vallavieille’s personal story is intimately linked to D-Day. American
paratroopers shot his father, Michel, in the back five times that morning. They then rushed him to
an army tent for lifesaving surgery and to England for further operations. Later, Michel de
Vallavieille became mayor and opened one of the region’s first D-Day museums inside a former
German bunker on Utah Beach.

The museum has expanded along the dune many times to make space for some 1,300 artifacts,
including an original B-26 bomber. But it increasingly finds itself in the cross hairs of climate
change.

Over the past number of years, Mr. de Vallavieille has been given permission to pad the beach
before the museum with dump loads of sand. But the state permit to do ends in 2026, and declares
it can only be renewed if the museum has developed a long-term plan to move — a proposition Mr.
de Vallavieille passionately rejects.

“For me, we absolutely have to protect it,” he said, pointing out that Dutch cities like Rotterdam
had mastered dike-building. “The museum has to be here. It’s the importance of this place.”

Directors at the Landing Museum in Arromanches-les-Bains felt the same way. They just reopened
after a massive renovation to their building costing 11 million euros, or about $11.8 million. The
museum’s internal risk assessment showed the site was unlikely to flood or erode, even given
climate change, the director Frédéric Sommier said.

If government politics bend, the price tag could still prove unsurmountable. In 2010, American
engineers spent $6 million to secure the observation bunker at the tip of Pointe du Hoc,
implanting concrete blocks at the cliff’s base and anchoring them into bedrock deep below.
Sensors show the construction worked — the observation bunker has not budged since. However,
pounding waves have eaten all around the concrete blocks below, said Mr. Desjardins. He is
planning another $10 million renovation to better serve the site’s swarm of visitors, but even that
does not include securing it against ocean storms.
Image
Scott Desjardins, superintendent of the American Battle Monuments Commission, at Pointe du Hoc in Normandy.
“There is absolutely no doubt we are going to lose more of our cliff,” he said.Credit...Andrea Mantovani for The New
York Times

U.S. troops landing on Utah Beach in 1944.Credit...via Musée du Débarquement de Utah Beach
Utah Beach in the aftermath of D-Day.Credit...via Musée du Débarquement de Utah Beach

“We will have to change how we do things,” he said, adding that the region might want to “draw
back” the sheer number of visitors to the area.

An ongoing study by local university professors into social perceptions of climate change and the
D-Day sites reveals mixed sentiments — many people living close to a site feel protective of it, but
overall, Normans accept that most will have to move, said Xavier Michel, an assistant geography
professor from the University of Caen who was leading the study.

Cécile Dumont, 92, is one of the few D-Day witnesses still alive. She considers Utah Beach sacred
ground, and would like to see the museum stay there. But, she concedes, it’s unlikely.

“The ocean will take it all. We won’t have a choice,” she said from her small stone house in Ste.-
Marie-du-Mont, surrounded by rose bushes and mementos of a long life — including a knee-high
shell casing, which she now uses to store scrap paper.

Ms. Dumont was a young teenager on D-Day, and vividly remembers the sound of planes
overhead, bomb blasts, gunfire. Her father, a dairy farmer, dug a trench next to the house, where
the family spent their nights praying for two weeks. “The bombing never stopped. It didn’t last just
one day,” she said.

She watched in awe as columns of soldiers arrived, first on foot, but quickly followed by tanks,
jeeps, bulldozers. That first day, 23,000 soldiers, 1,700 vehicles and 1,800 tons of supplies were
delivered to Utah Beach. They were followed by nearly half of the U.S. troops heading to the front
— more than 800,000 soldiers — and all the supplies to support them, over the next few months.

“People need to understand what happened here,” she said.

Farther east, a different conversation is unfolding at the Juno Beach Center — a museum set where
14,000 Canadian soldiers landed on D-Day. The beach here has actually thickened over the years,
its dune consuming old German bunkers.
Image
Cécile Dumont, 92, was a teenager when the Americans landed. “The ocean will take it all. We won’t have a choice,”
she said, referring to the sea’s encroachment.Credit...Andrea Mantovani for The New York Times

The Juno Beach Center has been working to build a carbon sink — planting trees in a nearby forest, where Canadian
troops harvested wood in the final year of the war.Credit...Andrea Mantovani for The New York Times

Even so, Nathalie Worthington, the center’s director, said, “It’s not a matter of if we will be
flooded, but a question of when.” Instead of spending money on protection plans, however, the
museum leadership decided instead to invest in the global battle against what it considers the
biggest threat to peace and democracy today — climate change.

In 2020, the staff measured the carbon footprint of the museum, and committed to reducing it by
5 percent a year until 2050, in line with the French government’s climate change strategy.

Since then, the center has introduced a reduced “low carbon” ticket price for visitors arriving by
bicycle, cut its energy usage and ordered Canadian supplies from the gift shop by ship, instead of
plane.

They have also been building a carbon sink — planting trees in a nearby forest, where Canadian
troops harvested wood during the war. Their hope, Ms. Worthington said, is that other museums
will follow.

“They deserve more from us than to just cry over their graves,” Ms. Worthington said of the former
soldiers. “They lost their lives to liberate us, to give us what we enjoy today. So what are we doing
to maintain it?”

The remains of an artificial harbor used in the D-Day landings in the sands at Arromanches-les-
Bains.