Both passages debate the minimum age required to apply
for a driver’s license. On one hand, passage 1 claims that some
safety expert and politicians have proposed raising the minimum driving age to 18. On the other hand, passage 2 agree with that most states require drivers to be 16 or 17, in some states like Alaska, 14-year-olds can apply for their learner’s permit. While both passages make valid points, passage 2, which is in favor of driver’s age does not matter, present the strongest argument. To begin, passage 2 says that the minimum driving age to 18 years old have been proposed by some politicians in order to reduce the number of fatalities each year due to teen-related driving accidents. The leading cause of road accidents and were often cited by the age of young teen drivers. Another powerful point addressed in the text is that data from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety backs this up by showing that raising the driving age does not actually prevent teen driver crashes, it just delays them. Furthermore, he or she begins with zero driving experience, no matter at what age a teenager first begins to drive. According to their statistics, the death rate due to driving accidents in Connecticut (where the driving licensing age is 17), it is the highest among 17-years-old. It is the experience of the driver that leads to some accidents, and it is not the age of driver that matters. Kate Willette of Seattle’s SWERVE Driving school agrees that it’s careful and extensive training, more than age, that prepares teenagers to be safe drivers. However, passage 1 that argues the minimum age for driving license is 18 make some valid points. Scientific evidence shows that the brain of an average teen operates very differently from that of average adult and that younger teens often make careless decision that can put their own lives and the lives of others in danger. Data provided by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety show that twice as many fatal crashes involve 16 to 17 years old than 18 to 19 years old, so it simply make sense to raise the minimum driving age. Passage 1 and 2 both present valid arguments, but passage 2 in favor of the age of driver does not matter provides more reasonable arguements