Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Impacto Da Dieta Materna Na Composição Do Leite Materno - BRAVI Et Al., 2020
Impacto Da Dieta Materna Na Composição Do Leite Materno - BRAVI Et Al., 2020
a systematic review1,2
Francesca Bravi,3* Frank Wiens,5 Adriano Decarli,3,6 Alessia Dal Pont,3 Carlo Agostoni,4,7 and Monica Ferraroni3
3
Laboratory of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Epidemiology “G.A. Maccacaro,” and 4Pediatric Clinic, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community
646 Am J Clin Nutr 2016;104:646–62. Printed in USA. Ó 2016 American Society for Nutrition
MATERNAL NUTRITION AND BREAST-MILK COMPOSITION 647
nutritional features of breast milk produced by mothers under inclusion and exclusion criteria. Disagreements were resolved
normal circumstances. by discussion and/or involving a third author (MF). For descriptive
purposes, we extracted information on study design, geographical
area, description of participants (including sample size, age of
METHODS
mothers, if available, and age of children), milk sample collection
Search strategy (including number of samples, characteristics of collection and
storage, and exclusivity of breastfeeding, if reported), maternal
We performed a PubMed and Medline (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
dietary assessment, nutritional properties in breast milk, and
pubmed) search for articles published up to January 2015 with the
quantitative estimates on the relation between maternal diet and
use of combinations of the terms “breastfeed,” “breast feed,”
nutritional properties in breast milk from each publication. The
“breastfed,” “breast fed,” “lactation,” “maternal milk,” “human
main results were summarized in tables according to the fol-
milk,” “breast milk,” “maternal diet,” “maternal nutrition,” “mother
lowing criteria: we reported any quantitative information on the
diet,” and “mother nutrition” following the PRISMA (Preferred
direct relation between maternal diet and breast-milk composi-
Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses)
Aitchison,1977 USA 6 11 mothers, aged 1 sample, collected in the morning Self-administered, 1-wk Pearson’s correlation coefficient (P) between PUFA-to-SFA ratio in
(17) 25–35 y before breakfast after nursing the dietary record; for 3 d maternal diet and milk (% of total FAs): 0.46 considering diet and
infant, for 1 wk between 4th a duplicate of each day’s milk in the same evening; 0.43 (,0.05) considering milk in the next
and 17th month of lactation (all 11 food consumption was morning; other specific FAs were considered
women) and a second sample, collected in a separate
collected in the evening after container and frozen at
nursing, for 1 wk between fourth ,2208C
and sixth month of lactation (only 5
women); all samples were
collected by using whatever
method each subject preferred and
were then frozen; milk FA
composition was examined
Alberti- Italy 5 29 mothers, aged 23– Collected 3, 8, and 20 d postpartum Dietary history was collected Spearman rank correlation coefficient (P) between maternal dietary intake
Fidanza, 42 y, exclusively by manual expression; milk by a dietitian in the third and milk oxygen radical absorption capacity (mmol/L trolox eq.): retinol,
2002 (18) breastfeeding vitamin C, vitamin E, retinol, and trimester of pregnancy and 0.39 (,0.05); retinol equivalent, 0.46 (,0.05); b-carotene, 0.45
b-carotene were examined postpartum (,0.05) in colostrum; vitamin C, 0.63 (,0.001); vitamin E, 0.42
(,0.05); b-carotene 0.42 (,0.05) in transitional milk; vitamin C,
0.59 (,0.001); b-carotene, 0.47 (,0.05) in mature milk
Antonakou, Greece 9 64 mothers, 64 samples collected at 20–30 d, 39 Self-administered 3-d dietary Pearson’s correlation coefficient (P) between maternal dietary EI (kcal)
2013 (20) exclusively samples at third month, 24 record at first, third, and and milk FAs (% of total FAs) at first month: DHA, 20.08; AA, 0.10;
breastfeeding; samples at sixth month; all sixth month postpartum LA, 20.09; n–3, 20.08; n–6, 20.01; SFAs, 20.01; MUFAs, 0.02;
mean 6 SD age: samples were collected during PUFAs, 20.03; AA-to-DHA, 0.15; n–6-to-n–3, 0.12; total fat (g/L),
32.5 6 3.1 y morning hours by electric breast 20.04
pump and stored at 2808C; milk Correlation between maternal dietary fat (% of EI) and milk FAs (% of
FA composition and fat were total FAs) at first month: DHA, 0.25 (,0.05); AA, 0.23; LA, 0.15;
examined n–3, 0.24; n–6, 0.17; SFAs, 20.05; MUFAs, 20.05; PUFAs, 0.20;
AA-to-DHA, 0.08; n–6-to-n–3, 0.05; total fat (g/L), 0.12
Correlation between maternal dietary MUFAs (% of EI) and milk FAs
(% of total FAs) at first month: DHA, 0.18; AA, 0.24; LA, 0.26
(,0.05); n–3, 0.18; n–6, 0.27 (,0.05); SFAs, 20.16; MUFAs, 0.01;
PUFAs, 0.29 (,0.05); AA-to-DHA, 0.16; n–6-to-n–3, 0.10; total fat
MATERNAL NUTRITION AND BREAST-MILK COMPOSITION
(g/L), 20.01
Correlation between maternal dietary PUFAs (% of EI) and milk FAs
(% of total FAs) at first month: DHA, 0.27 (,0.05); AA, 0.16; LA,
0.26 (,0.05); n–3, 0.26 (,0.05); n–6, 0.22; SFAs, 20.02; MUFAs,
20.09; PUFAs, 0.25 (,0.05); AA-to-DHA, 0.01; n–6-to-n–3, 0.03;
total fat (g/L), 0.08
Correlation between maternal dietary SFAs (% of EI) and milk FAs (%
of total FAs) at first month: DHA, 0.16; AA, 0.09; LA, 20.15; n–3,
0.15; n–6, 20.08; SFAs, 0.01; MUFAs, 0.01; PUFAs, 20.05; AA-to-
DHA, 20.05; n–6-to-n–3, 20.09; total fat (g/L), 0.10
(Continued)
649
De la Presa- Spain 4 40 mothers, aged Collected between 20 and 30 d Dietary questionnaire Lower LA (% of total FAs) content was observed between mothers
Owens, 18–39 y postpartum, by manual consuming olive oil (n = 15) or sunflower oil (n = 6) as the preferential
1996 (23) expression or electric withdrawal fat source (P , 0.0005); differences in DHA (% of total FAs) and
(foremilk); samples were stored at EPA (% of total FAs) content between mothers reporting high fish
2208C; milk FA composition was consumption and those reporting low or no consumption were highly
examined significant (P , 0.001); other specific FAs were considered
Finley, 1985 USA 7 57 mothers, aged 172 samples collected in the morning 24-h dietary recall at initial Percentage of fat or FAs (6SDs) in breast milk and percentage of FAs
(44) 22–37 y between 1 mo and 31 mo interview, 2-d diet record (6SDs) in milk fat for vegetarians vs. nonvegetarians: milk fat,
postpartum, by hand or manual monthly before breast-milk 3.21 6 1.78 vs. 3.23 6 2.13; lauric acid, 5.98 6 1.81 vs. 5.08 6 1.49;
breast pump extraction; samples collection; women were myristic acid, 8.23 6 2.39 vs. 7.67 6 2.60; palmitic acid, 22.50 6
were stored at 2208C; fat and FA classified as vegetarians, 3.63 vs. 23.96 6 2.92; stearic acid, 7.44 6 1.53 vs. 8.70 6 1.31;
composition in milk was examined semivegetarians (fish oleic acid, 30.74 6 4.13 vs. 32.98 6 3.51; LA, 18.38 6 4.67 vs.
eaters), and omnivores 14.65 6 4.24; ALA, 1.59 6 0.45 vs. 1.51 6 0.41; AA, 0.30 6 0.10
vs. 0.28 6 0.07; DHA, 0.05 6 0.004 vs. 0.06 6 0.004
None of the correlations between FAs in milk and maternal dietary intakes of
total fat, animal fat, and vegetable fat were significant; partial correlation
from stepwise multiple regression analysis between stearic acid in milk
and maternal dietary intake of total fat, r = 0.61; maternal intake of animal
fat, r = 20.02; maternal intake of vegetable fat, r = 20.56
Finley, 1985 USA 7 52 mothers; mean age: 222 samples collected in the morning 24-h dietary recall at initial Pearson’s correlation coefficient between maternal nutrient intake and
(45) 29 y between 3–4 wk postpartum and interview, 2-d diet record breast-milk composition: protein, 0.06; carbohydrate (correlated
20 mo postpartum, by hand or manual monthly before breast-milk with milk lactose), 0.04; fat, 0.03; iron, 20.06; calcium, 0.10;
breast pump extraction; samples collection; women were magnesium, 20.08; potassium, 20.07
were stored at 2208C; protein, classified as vegetarians,
lactose, lipid, minerals, and trace semivegetarians (fish
elements in milk were examined eaters), and omnivores
Kodentsova, Russia 6 25 mothers Collected between 3 and 10 d Dietary regimen was studied Pearson’s correlation coefficient (P) between maternal dietary vitamin
2006 (24) postpartum from fasting mothers in during hospital stay by intake and milk vitamins: vitamin C (mg/L), 0.841 (0.01); thiamin
the morning; samples were stored at master menu (mg/L), 0.751 (0.001); riboflavin (mg/L), 0.739 (0.001)
2208C; milk vitamin C, thiamin,
and riboflavin were examined;
vitamin C was examined in freshly
MATERNAL NUTRITION AND BREAST-MILK COMPOSITION
expressed milk
Lauritzen, Denmark 7 12 mothers Collected w4 mo postpartum; in the Self-administered dietary Mean 6 SD FA composition (% of total FAs) in breast milk with fatty
2002 (25) 7-d study 12 mothers provided 7 record of the day before fish (n = 11) and lean fish (n = 12) vs. no fish (n = 12) consumption:
consecutive hind milk samples; milk sample collection SFAs, 48.9 6 11.6, 43.2 6 4.6 vs. 44.1 6 3.6; MUFAs, 36.6 6
samples were collected after the every day for 1 wk 11.3, 39.5 6 2.6 vs. 39.0 6 2.1; LA, 10.0 6 3.4, 11.0 6 2.3 vs.
first feeding in the morning and 10.2 6 1.6; AA, 0.40 6 0.13, 0.41 6 0.07 vs. 0.42 6 0.06; ALA,
stored at 2808C; milk FA 1.4 6 0.5, 1.5 6 0.5 vs. 1.4 6 0.2; EPA, 0.24 6 0.12**, 0.15 6
composition was examined 0.04 vs. 0.16 6 0.06; DPA, 0.31 6 0.10*, 0.24 6 0.06 vs. 0.25 6
0.06; DHA, 0.73 6 0.36**, 0.49 6 0.14 vs. 0.41 6 0.15; total n–6,
11.0 6 3.7, 12.1 6 2.4 vs. 11.3 6 1.7; total n–3, 2.9 6 1.1*, 2.7 6
0.6 vs. 2.5 6 0.4; total n–6-to-n–3, 3.8 6 1.8, 4.6 6 1.1 vs. 4.7 6
0.8 (different from the no-fish group: *P , 0.05, **P , 0.01)
(Continued)
651
Olang, 2012 Iran 8 106 mothers, aged Collected 8–72 h after delivery by Food-frequency questionnaire Mean 6 SD FA composition (molar % concentration) in breast milk
(31) 14–43 y hand pumping and stored at referring to diet during for non/seldom intakes (n = 64), 1 portion/wk (n = 25), and $2
2208C; milk FA composition was pregnancy administered by portions/wk (n = 17) of fish and seafood during pregnancy—DHA:
examined a researcher 0.52 6 0.23, 0.62 6 0.27, and 0.69 6 0.34*; AA/DHA: 3.2 6 2.4,
2.4 6 1.1*, and 2.45 6 1.6* (different from non/seldom, *P , 0.05)
Ortega, 1999 Spain 8 57 mothers, aged Collected at 13–14 d (transitional 5-d dietary record verified by Mean 6 SD (P) vitamin E (mmol/L) in breast milk among mothers
(32) 18–35 y milk) and 40 d (mature milk); a nutritionist with vitamin E intake ,75% of RI (= 15 mg/d) (n = 39) vs. vitamin
samples were collected during E intake $75% of RI (n = 18): 3.80 6 1.32 vs. 5.01 6 1.81 (,0.05)
morning hours at the beginning in transitional milk; 2.20 6 0.72 vs. 2.27 6 0.77 in mature milk
and end of feeding by manual
expression and were stored at
2208C; milk vitamin E was
examined
Ortega, 1997 Spain 8 57 mothers, aged Collected at 13–14 d (transitional 5-d dietary record verified by Correlation coefficient (P) between maternal zinc intake and content of
(33) 18–35 y milk) and 40 d (mature milk); a nutritionist zinc in transitional milk (r = 0.35, P , 0.05) and zinc in mature milk
samples were collected during (r = 0.45, P , 0.05)
morning hours at the beginning Mean 6 SD (P) zinc (mmol/L) in breast milk among mothers with zinc
and end of feeding by manual intakes ,50% of RI (= 20 mg/d) (n = 25) vs. vitamin E intake $50%
expression and were stored at of RI (n = 32): 46.7 6 7.3 vs. 51.0 6 9.2 in transitional milk; 28.7 6
2208C; milk zinc was examined 6.2 vs. 33.1 6 8.0 (,0.05) in mature milk
Quinn, 2012 Philippines 6 102 mothers; age A single morning sample collected 0– Single dietary recall R2 from unadjusted linear regression model between maternal EI (kcal/d) and
(34) range: 23–24 y 18 mo postpartum; samples were administered by an breast-milk content: EI (kcal/d), 0.02; fat (% of EI), 0.02; sugar (% of EI),
collected by manual expression and interviewer 0.07
stored at 2358C; milk energy, fat,
protein, and sugar were examined
Rist, 2007 (35) Netherlands 6 312 mothers (mean 6 Collected 1 mo postpartum in the Self-administered food- Mean 6 SD FA composition (% of total FAs) in breast milk among (1)
SD age): (1) morning, before breastfeeding, frequency questionnaire in nonorganic diet (n = 186); (2) 50–90% organic diet, both meat and dairy
nonorganic diet either by manual expression or week 34 of the pregnancy; products (n = 33); (3) .90% organic diet, both meat and dairy products
(32.5 6 3.8 y); (2) electric breast pump; samples were participants specified (n = 37); and (4) other combination of organic meat and organic dairy
50–90% organic, stored at 2808C; milk FA whether the aliments had products (n = 56)—total SFAs: (1) 40.71 6 4.33, (2) 42.25 6 5.82, (3)
both meat and dairy composition was examined originated from 41.91 6 5.36, (4) 42.07 6 4.75; total MUFAs: (1) 40.84 6 3.08, (2)
products (34.2 6 conventional or organic 39.48 6 4.12, (3) 38.57 6 3.20***, (4) 40.28 6 3.97; total PUFAs: (1)
MATERNAL NUTRITION AND BREAST-MILK COMPOSITION
3.6 y); (3) .90% production (,50%, 50– 18.45 6 3.53, (2) 18.27 6 4.36, (3) 19.51 6 4.67, (4) 17.66 6 2.95;
organic, both meat 90% or .90% of the food, ALA: (1) 1.05 6 0.38, (2) 0.89 6 0.41*, (3) 0.82 6 0.28***, (4) 0.93 6
and dairy products within the corresponding 0.27*; LA: (1) 13.73 6 3.19, (2) 13.81 6 4.28, (3) 14.90 6 4.40, (4)
(35.4 6 4.0 y); (4) food group) 13.06 6 2.87; rumenic acid: (1) 0.25 6 0.07, (2) 0.29 6 0.10*, (3)
other combination 0.34 6 0.10***, (4) 0.27 6 0.11; palmitic acid: (1) 22.62 6 2.30, (2)
of organic meat and 22.79 6 2.54, (3) 22.63 6 2.86, (4) 23.21 6 2.57; stearic acid: (1) 7.02 6
organic dairy 1.48, (2) 6.60 6 1.49, (3) 6.87 6 1.15, (4) 6.95 6 1.66; myristic acid: (1)
products (33.9 6 5.63 6 1.50, (2) 6.65 6 1.74**, (3) 6.42 6 1.78*, (4) 6.20 6 1.80*;
3.7 y) lauric acid: (1) 4.56 6 1.70, (2) 4.95 6 1.90, (3) 4.69 6 1.52, (4) 4.61 6
1.57; trans-vaccenic acid: (1) 0.48 6 0.21, (2) 0.54 6 0.26, (3) 0.59 6
0.16***, (4) 0.53 6 0.16* (different from the conventional group: *P ,
0.05, **P , 0.01, ***P , 0.001); other specific FAs were considered
(Continued)
653
Roepke, 1979 USA 5 61 mothers; age range: Collected in the early morning Self-administered 24-h diet Mean 6 SE (P) milk vitamin B-6 (mg/L) among mothers with dietary
(36) 18–37 between 3rd and 14th day recall and a 3-d diet record, intakes of vitamin B-6 #2.5 vs. .2.5 mg/d: 8.1 6 1.5 vs. 16.1 6
postpartum, by manual expression; in accordance with 3.0 (0.02) at 3 d postpartum; 40.1 6 1.03 vs. 57.4 6 7.2 (0.05) at 14
samples were stored at 2308C; instructions given by d postpartum
milk vitamin B-6 was examined a dietitian
Salmenpera, Finland 7 47 mothers All collected at 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12 mo 7-d food consumption record Pearson’s correlation coefficient (P) between maternal dietary intake
1984 (37) and in the exclusively breastfed collected on 2 occasions: and breast-milk concentration of vitamin C (mg/100 mL): 0.39
infants also at 7.5, 10, and 11 mo; 1–2 and 4–5 mo (,0.01) at 1–2 mo; 0.46 (,0.01) at 4–5 mo
in addition a maternal sample was postpartum, in accordance
collected on the third or fourth day with instructions given by
postpartum; all samples were a dietitian
obtained after breakfast and before
mother’s lunch; milk vitamin C
was examined
Scopesi, 2001 Italy 7 34 mothers, aged Collected on day 1 postpartum 6 dietary questionnaires Pearson’s correlation coefficient (P) between maternal dietary intake
(38) 25–35 y (colostrum); days 4 and 7 administered 1 d postpartum and corresponding breast-milk concentrations (% of total FAs):
(transitional milk); and days 14, 21, and on days 4, 7, 14, 21, and SFAs, 0.60 (,0.01) in transitional milk; MUFAs, 0.63 (,0.01) in
and 28 (mature milk) after 28 after colostrum transitional milk; PUFAs, 0.65 (P , 0.01) in mature milk
colostrum appearance by manual appearance; referred to
expression and stored at 2208C; maternal dietary intake from
milk FA composition was the previous day
examined
Valent, 2011 Italy 8 100 mothers (82 Collected 3 mo postpartum, without Semistructured questionnaire Spearman’s correlation coefficients (P) between weekly intakes of food
BRAVI ET AL.
(39) exclusively indication of the time of the day or administered by trained items/groups during pregnancy and selenium breast-milk
breastfeeding), with regard to the infant’s feeding; interviewers w3 mo concentrations: vegetables (servings), 20.02 (0.80); fruit (servings),
aged 18–42 y samples were collected by manual postpartum referred to 20.18 (0.07); milk and dairy products (servings), 20.16 (0.12); meat
expression and stored at 2208C; maternal dietary intake (servings), 20.06 (0.54); all fish and seafood (servings), 0.12 (0.22);
milk selenium was examined during pregnancy and pasta, rice, bread, pizza, and cakes (servings), 20.01 (0.89); eggs (1/wk),
lactation 0.20 (0.04); other food items were considered
Vuori, 1980 Finland 7 15 mothers, aged Collected at the beginning and end of Two self-administered 7-d Correlation coefficient (P) between EI (kcal) and breast-milk minerals
(40) 24–35 y each feeding during 24 h and then food records, in accordance (mg): iron, 0.478 (,0.01); zinc, 0.554 (,0.01)
pooled, 6–8 wk and 17–22 wk with instructions provided,
postpartum; milk iron and zinc collected 6–8 wk and 17–22
were examined wk postpartum
Xiang, 2005 China and 5 23 Chinese mothers; A single sample collected 3 mo Self-administered 3-d dietary Pearson’s correlation coefficient (P) between dietary intake of DHA
(41) Sweden mean 6 SD age: postpartum by manual expression record collected at third (g/d) and breast-milk DHA (% of total FAs): 0.71 (,0.001) among
27.4 6 0.8 y; 17 and stored at 2708C; milk FA month postpartum Chinese mothers and 0.54 (,0.05) among Swedish mothers
Swedish mothers; composition was examined
mean 6 SD age:
29.5 6 1.0; all
exclusively
breastfeeding
1
Significant results (when not otherwise specified, P , 0.05) are shown in bold type. AA, arachidonic acid; ALA, a-linolenic acid; DPA, docosapentaenoic acid, EI, energy intake; FA, fatty acid, LA,
linoleic acid; ref, reference; RI, recommended intake; TFA, trans fatty acid.
Craig- USA 7.5 Crossover 8 mothers, all Collected daily 2 mo postpartum Two 5-d diets (with an Mean 6 common SEM (P) FA composition
Schmidt, experimental study exclusively during the 5 d of both dietary intervening 2-d period) (% of total FAs) in breast milk for diet
1984 (46) breastfeeding, periods, as well as on the day identical except for the with H vs. NH fat source: lauric acid, 2.66
aged 21–36 y after each dietary period; sources of fat: H vs. NH vs. 3.52 6 0.30; myristic acid, 4.24 vs.
samples were collected by 6.58 6 0.23 (,0.01); palmitic acid,
manual expression after the 23.93 vs. 27.85 6 0.87 (,0.01);
first nursing period of the day palmitoleic acid, 2.54 vs. 2.85 6 0.07
and stored at 2808C ; milk FA (,0.05); stearic acid, 7.34 vs. 7.09 6
composition was examined 0.35; elaidic acid, 6.53 vs. 1.84 6 0.33
(,0.01); oleic acid, 33.35 vs. 31.57 6
0.46 (,0.05); LA, 12.98 vs. 14.40 6
0.85; other specific FAs were considered
Forsum, 1980 Sweden 7 Crossover 3 mothers, aged Collected 13–20 wk postpartum 4 d of low-protein diet, 1 d of Mean 6 SD (P) protein content in breast
(47) experimental study 27–30 y on the fourth day of both washout, and then 4 d of milk (g/d) for low-protein diet vs. high-
experimental diets, before and high-protein diet protein diet: true protein, 7.31 6 0.74 vs.
after feeding; samples were 8.83 6 0.44 (,0.05); lactoferrin, 2.52 6
collected by manual 0.17 vs. 3.01 6 0.36; a-lactalbumin,
expression or by a manual 1.50 6 0.20 vs. 1.75 6 0.12; lactose,
breast pump and stored at 58.1 6 13.2 vs. 63.5 6 5.6
2208C; milk protein and
nitrogen composition were
examined
Mellies, 1978 USA 7 Crossover 14 mothers Collected 1 mo postpartum, and 2-wk baseline nutrition history Means 6 SEs for baseline diet vs. diet 1 vs.
BRAVI ET AL.
(48) experimental study subsequently 1 time/wk, at the collected 1 mo postpartum by diet 2: milk cholesterol (mg/g milk fat),
beginning or end of the second a nutritionist; mothers were 2.4 6 0.4 vs. 2.4 6 0.1 vs. 2.5 6 0.2;
nursing period of the day, by randomly assigned to 1 of the milk phytosterols (mg/g milk fat), 0.17 6
either manual expression or diets followed by the other; 0.03 vs. 2.2 6 0.3* vs. 0.7 6 0.1; total
breast pump; samples were diet 1: cholesterol-poor, milk fat, 3.58 6 0.56 vs. 2.69 6 0.16 vs.
frozen; milk cholesterol, phytosterol-rich, 2.66 6 0.16 (*P , 0.0001)
phytosterols, and total fat were polyunsaturated-rich
examined (PUFAs:SFAs: 1.8); diet 2:
cholesterol-rich, phytosterol-
poor, polyunsaturated-poor
(PUFAs:SFAs: 0.12)
Mohammad, USA 7 Crossover 7 mothers; mean 6 Collected between 6 and 14 wk Two 8-d diets (separated by 1–2 Mean 6 SEM (significant at P , 0.05)
2009 (49) experimental study SD age: 29.3 6 postpartum for 4 d and 3 nights; wk): H-F diet (30% breast-milk composition for H-CHO vs.
1.0 y samples were collected every 3 carbohydrate, 55% fat, 15% H-F diet: EI (kcal/d), 619 6 23 vs. 654 6
h at the beginning, middle, and protein) vs. H-CHO diet 24; lactose (g/dL), 7.3 6 0.2 vs. 7.3 6
end of feeding (8 samples (60% carbohydrate, 25% fat, 0.2; lactose (g/d), 0 6 3 vs. 60 6 2;
daily), by breast pump; milk 15% protein) protein (g/dL), 1.8 6 0.1 vs. 1.9 vs. 0.1;
energy, lactose, protein, and fat protein (g/d), 15 6 0.9 vs. 16 6 0.8; fat
were examined (g/dL), 4.3 6 0.3 vs. 4.8 6 0.3; fat (g/d),
34 6 2 vs. 39 6 2
(Continued)
Nasser, 2010 Canada 7.5 Crossover 14 mothers, Collected between 2 and 6 mo Women were randomly Mean 6 SEM (P) FA composition (% of total
(50) experimental study exclusively postpartum, the third and fourth assigned to receive each FAs) in breast milk for low-fat vs. high-fat
breastfeeding, day of each controlled dietary dietary intervention (low-fat diet: total SFAs, 41.1 6 0.82 vs. 40.40 6
aged 18–40 y period; samples were collected and high-fat diet) for 4 d, 0.85 (0.46); lauric acid, 5.38 6 1.16 vs.
by a manual breast pump and each with a washout period of 3.98 6 0.37 (0.01); myristic acid, 7.31 6
stored at 2708C; milk FA 3 d, during which mothers 0.35 vs. 6.76 6 0.48 (0.07); palmitic acid,
composition was examined consumed their usual diet 22.70 6 0.45 vs. 23.43 6 0.24 (0.43);
(evaluated through a 3-d stearic acid, 5.00 6 0.11 vs. 6.08 6 0.14
dietary record); low-fat (0.01); MUFAs, 38.70 6 0.80 vs. 39.90 6
diet: fat = 17.6% of EI, 0.65 (0.10); palmitoleic acid, 1.95 6 0.29
protein = 14.4% of EI, vs. 1.31 6 0.23 (0.046); oleic acid, 36.16 6
carbohydrate = 68.0 of EI; 0.86 vs. 37.81 6 0.67 (0.08); PUFAs,
high-fat diet: fat = 40.3% of 16.90 6 0.66 vs. 16.40 6 0.48 (0.54); LA,
EI, protein = 14.4% of EI, 14.65 6 0.62 vs. 13.82 6 0.45 (0.27);
carbohydrate = 45.3 of EI ALA, 1.22 6 0.04 vs. 1.69 6 0.06 (0.01);
AA, 0.34 6 0.01 vs. 0.30 6 0.02 (0.02);
DHA, 0.12 6 0.02 vs. 0.14 6 0.04 (0.77);
other specific FAs were considered
Park, 1999 USA 7 Crossover 16 mothers, aged Collected between 1 and 26 mo Women were asked to consume Pearson’s correlation coefficient between
(51) experimental study 21–38 y postpartum on days 3 and 7 in diets low in rumenic acid milk rumenic acid concentration (mmol/g
each period; samples were throughout the experiment fat) and current dietary intake: rumenic
collected by electric breast (3 wk), except during the acid (mg) 0.32; oleic acid (g), 20.41;
pump and stored at 2808C; assigned week; group A: MUFAs (g), 0.38
milk rumenic acid and FA high-fat dairy period during Mean 6 SEM (significant at P , 0.05) FA
composition were examined week 2; group B: high-fat composition (mmol/g fat) in breast milk for
dairy period during week 3; high- vs. low-dairy periods: rumenic acid,
current intakes of rumenic 13.5 6 1.1 vs. 8.2 6 0.4; myristic acid,
acid were estimated by using 264.7 6 34.3 vs. 195.2 6 11.0; palmitic
dietary records during the last acid, 707.0 6 51.5 vs. 511.3 6 16.4;
3 d of each period; usual palmitoleic acid, 81.7 6 10.2 vs. 65.8 6 3.1;
intakes of rumenic acid were stearic acid, 219.0 6 23.1 vs. 154.3 6 7.4;
estimated by using oleic acid, 1055.0 6 103.4 vs. 874.3 6
MATERNAL NUTRITION AND BREAST-MILK COMPOSITION
Uhari, 1985 Finland 7 Experimental study 34 mothers Collected on days 3, 4, and 5 Standard hospital diet (PUFAs: Mean 6 SD (significant at P , 0.001) FA
(52) admitted to 1 of postpartum in the morning, at SFAs = 0.1) vs. experimental composition (% of total FAs) in breast
3 postpartum the end of feeding; samples diet high in PUFAs:SFAs milk for ordinary (n = 15) vs.
wards after were collected from mothers (PUFAs:SFAs = 1.5) experimental (n = 19) diets 3 d
delivery with extra excretion and stored postpartum: ALA, 0.60 6 0.07 vs. 0.64 6
at 2608C; milk FA 0.08; AA, 0.70 6 0.17 vs. 0.81 6 0.18;
composition was examined EPA, 0.09 6 0.03 vs. 0.09 6 0.02; DHA,
0.66 6 0.17 vs. 0.62 6 0.16; myristic
acid, 7.68 6 1.14 vs. 7.53 6 1.52;
palmitic acid, 29.95 6 2.14 vs. 26.16 6
2.00; palmitoleic acid, 3.00 6 0.53 vs.
2.92 6 0.59; stearic acid, 9.60 6 1.03 vs.
7.63 6 1.00; oleic acid, 35.79 6 2.32 vs.
31.05 6 2.57; LA, 8.07 6 1.93 vs. 18.66
6 4.52
Mean 6 SD FA composition (% of total
FAs) in breast milk for ordinary (n = 15)
vs. experimental (n = 19) diets 4–5 d
postpartum (significant at P , 0.05):
ALA, 0.60 6 0.18 vs. 0.69 6 0.09; AA,
0.59 6 0.09 vs. 0.68 6 0.18; EPA, 0.09 6
0.02 vs. 0.09 6 0.03; DHA, 0.55 6
0.13 vs 0.59 6 0.14
BRAVI ET AL.
n–6 PUFA content was positively correlated with maternal di- TFAs
etary intakes of total MUFAs (r = 0.27, P , 0.05) but not with An observational study from Malaysia reported no correlations
total energy, total fat, total PUFA, total SFA, carbohydrate, and between maternal dietary intakes of fruit and vegetables and
total protein intakes (20). The Finnish observational study re- breast-milk total TFAs (22). In the same study, a positive as-
ported a higher breast-milk n–6 PUFA content among mothers sociation was reported between breast-milk total TFAs and di-
who consumed vegetable oil–based spreads (12.5% compared etary elaidic acid (r = 0.48, P , 0.05).
with 10.5%; P , 0.0001) (28). However, another study from In a crossover study from the United States, the proportion of
Denmark reported no association between fish consumption and breast-milk elaidic acid was higher with a diet that included
breast-milk n–6 PUFAs (25). hydrogenated fat than with a non–hydrogenated-fat diet (6.53%
An observational study from Iceland showed a positive corre- compared with 1.84%; P , 0.01) (46).
lation between DHA in breast milk and maternal intakes of total A Dutch observational study reported a higher proportion of
protein (r = 0.35, P = 0.002) (30). A Greek observational study breast-milk rumenic acid with a strict organic diet than with
showed a positive correlation between DHA in breast milk and a nonorganic diet (0.34% compared with 0.25%; P , 0.001)
maternal intakes of total fat (r = 0.25, P , 0.05) and total PUFAs