TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..... LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF TABLES .. CHAPTER 1: PROJECT BACKGROUND. 41.1 Statement of the problem, 1.2 Project Description and Objective. 1.3 Project Client. Client Specifications. 1.4 Project Scope and Limitations. Scope. Limitations... 15 Project Development Cycle. CHAPTER 2: DESIGN CRITERIA AND REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE... 2.1 Design Input... Demography. Location Map... Vicinity Map Topographic Map. Climate Hazard. Seismic Hazard Assessment Ground Rupture. Ground Shaking. Liquefaction... Volcanic Hazard Assessment Hydro-Meteorological Assessment. 2.2 Review of Related Literature. vi "CHAPTER 3: DESIGN CONSTRAINTS, TRADE OFFS, AND STANDARDS 3.1 Design Constraints Quantitative Constraints Economic Constraint (Project Cost) Constructabilty Constraint (Labor Cost)... Sustainability Constraint (Maintenance Cost) Risk Constraint Uncertainty Constraint Safety Constraint Qualitative Constraints Social Constraint Public Health Constraint Political Constraint 3.2 Design Tradeofts 3.3 Multiple Constraints Using Initial Normalization Method 3.4 Raw Data, 3.5 Normalized Method ..... 3,6 Design Codes and Standards ..... Fa 25 25 6 2 2a 25 26 26 26 a a a a a 37 40 oT 51CHAPTER 4: DESIGN PROCESS 53 4.1 Design Methodology 53 4.2 Design Parameters... 7 eens ercnnenneenneesee 5B 4.3 Design Process for Retaining Wall (Context |) on one B 4.4 Design Load 3 4.5 Structural Analysis 76 4.8 Modeling of Structures... 8 47 Analysis of Safety 81 4.8 Design Process for Flood Gate (Context I) 82 4.9 Design Parameters for Flood Gate (Context I!) . seo BB 4.10 Caleulation of Capatity..... ees sesineninnnenntnnsennesee 8 4.11 Design Process for Dredging (Context Ill) 90 4.12 Bathymettic SUEY ..ccnssnstenstnnse even se sees 9 4.13 Monitoring of Dredged Material Dumping Operations ee 4.14 Disposal Sites 93 4.16 Sensitivity Analysis 94 CHAPTER 5: FINAL DESIGN ..... fen eves sercitnsteteesenaneeee 100 5.1 Rainfall Analysis 110 5.2 Protection to Scouring 110 villREFLECTIVE ESSAYS. 114 CURRICULUM VITAE 118 REFERENCES, APPENDICESList of Figures Figure 1.1; Project Development Cycle Figure 2.1.1: Location Map Figure 2.1.2: Vicinity Map .... Figure 2.1.3: Topographic Map of San Juan River, Quezon City... Figure 2.1.4: Climate Map ofthe Philippines... Figure 2.1.5: Ground Rupture Hazard Map of San Juan, Quezon City Figure 2.1.6: Ground Shaking Hazard Map of San Juan, Quezon City Figure 2.2.1: Sheet Piling River Protection in Pampanga Figure 2.2.1: Retaining Wall in Marikina as River Flood Control Figure 2.2.3: River Wall Protection in Las Pinas Figure 2.2.4: Flood Wall Built to Protect Residents of Flood-Prone Barangay in Ilocos Sur Figure 2.2.5: Vinyl sheet pile as flood protection in Philippines Figure 2.2.6: Flood Control Structure Builtin Negros Occidental Figure 2.2.7: Tonsuya river wall in CAMANAVA Figure 2.2.8: Tulahan River Dredging... Figure 2.2.9: Marikina River Dredging ..... Figure 2.2.10: Laoag River Dredging Figure 2.2.11: Pasig City Pumping Station ........:nsse eves Figure 2.2.12: Valenzuela Pumping Station Figure 2.2.13: Xylem Water System Figure 2.2.14: Flood Control Structure for River Backflow in Pampanga Figure 2.2.15: Mandangoa Spillway 0. evn Figure 2.2.16: Bontoc Spillway Figure 3.2.1; Combination of Reinforced Concrete and Structural Steel as river wall protection .... Figure 3.2.2: Flood bypass filed with nearly annual floods, flood banks to avoid a flood plain Figure 3.2.3: Deepening of Riverbed ... Figure 3.2.4: Mississippi River Spillway Figure 3.2.5: San Antonio River Flood Tunnel Figure 3.2.6; Stormwater Pump Station 4 12, 13 13 14 15 16 wa lT eal 18 19 20 a 22 23 24 28 29 34 33 34 36Figure 4.2.1: Catchment Area Figure 4.2.2: Topographic Map of the Project Site Figure 4.2.3: Topographic Map of the Project Site Basin Figure 4.2.4: Land Cover... Figure 4.2.4; Land Use . vnc even Figure 4.2.5: Soi Cover. Figure 4.2.6: Geometry Model in HEC-RAS ..... Figure 4.2.7: 25-YR Flood Depth Map (Existing Scenario)... Figure 4.2.8: 10-YR Flood Depth Map (Existing Scenario) Figure 4.2.9: 2-YR Flood Depth Map (Existing Scenario) Figure 4.2.10: Flood Points Location Figure 4.2.11: Dredging Area Figure 4.2.12: 25-YR Flood Depth Map (With Proposed Project Scenario) Figure 4.2.13: 10-YR Flood Depth Map (With Proposed Project Scenario) Figure 4.2.14: 2-YR Flood Depth Map (With Proposed Project Scenario) Figure 4.3.1: Design Process for Retaining Wal Figure 4.5.1: Cross Section .. Figure 4.6.1: Geometric Model of Retaining Wall... Figure 4.6.2: Geometric model of cantilever retaining wall and bar placement Figure 4.6.3: Geometric model of Steel Casing on Pile foundation Figure 4.6.4: Geometric model ofthe Steel sheet, Figure 4.6.5: Geometric Model of Pile Foundation and Stee! Sheet Top View Figure 4.8.1: Design Process for Flood Gate Figure 4.10.1: Design Perspective of Proposed Flood Gate System Figure 4.10.2: Floor Plan of Proposed Flood Gate System Figure 4.10.3; Cross Section ..... Figure 4.10.4; Specification of Steel Sheet Pile... Figure 4.10.5: Detail Connection of Steel Sheet Pile .......s.cssssstnse x 87 87 88 88 89Figure 4.11.1: Design Process for Dredging 90 Figure 4.11.2: Design Perspective for Dredging ..... evn sven 9 Figure 4.11.3: Dredge Prism Illustration (Reprinted from US Army Corps of Engineers (2008)... 92 Figure 4.15.1: Sensitivity Analysis Economic Vs. Constructabily 0... evenness Figure 4.15.2: Sensitivity Analysis Economic Vs. Sustainability... ccnannnnennsenee 9B Figure 4.17: Sensitivity Analysis Economic Vs. Uncertainty... 7 . 97 Figure 4.15.4: Sensitivity Analysis Economic Vs. Risk 7 nese even 9B Figure 4.16.5: Sensitivity Analysis Economic Vs, Safely fen ee) Figure 5.1: Bored file elevation 401 Figure 5.2; Revetment Plan 102 Figure 5.3: Capping Beam Rebar Detail 402 Figure 5.4: Typical Section of Revetment 103 Figure 5.5: Bored Pile Detail Figure 5.6: Steel Sheet Pile Connection Detail Figure 5.7: Section 2A Figure 5.8: Section 28 ....... eeseestsae eeceeste eeseeseene cesseneenesnsen OT Figure 5.9: Section View ....... eeseeseene eesteseseene eesetseensenstseeseesot 4 OB Figure 5.10: Front View & Section View ....... seseeseeae cessesnentsaeseeasee 109 Figure 5.11: Front View - 6" CHB End Wall es . eeseee eeseeseeneeseen 109 xiList of Tables Table 2.1; Seismic Hazard Assessment of San Juan River, Quezon City... Table 3.2.1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Retaining Wall. Table 3.2.2: Advantages and Disadvantages of Flood Gate system .. Table 3.2, Table 3.2.4: \dvantages and Disadvantages of Dredging ....rn-no \dvantages and Disadvantages of Spillway .. Table 3.2.5: Advantages and Disadvantages of Flood Tunnel Table 3.2.6: Advantages and Disadvantages of Pumping Station Table 3.3.1: Evaluation Raw Designers Data Table 3.3.2: Normalization Raw Evaluation Data coo 28 30 231 34 36 36 38 38 Table 3.3.3: Weighted percentage for the sum of Constraints. which weighted Economical and Safety. Table 3.3.4; Weighted percentage for sum of Constraints which weighted Safety and Economical Table 3.3.5: Weighed percentage fr sum of Cnsns which weighed Rist, Uncen, Eeonomiea and Safety Table 3.4.1: Economic Raw Data Trade off Context (Dredging) Table 3.4.2: Economic Raw Data Trade off Context (Retaining Wall) Table 3.4.3: Economic Raw Data Trade off Context (Flood bypass System / Flood Gate) Table 3.4.4: Actviies Raw Data Forecast in Trade off Context | (Dredging) Table 3.4.5: Gantt Chart for Trade off Context (Dredging) Table 3.4.6: Table 3.4, Table 3.4.8: Activities Raw Data forecast in Trade off Context Ill (Flood Gate) Table 3.4.9: Gantt Chart Trade off Context Ill (Flood Gate) .. Table 3.5.1: Designer's Raw Data tivities Raw Data forecast in Trade off Context (Retaining wall) jantt Chart Trade off Context Il Retaining wal) Table 3.5.2: Normalization of Data of Design of Structural Components Context ..... Table 3.5.3: 1% Weighted sum of Various Percentage for Structural Components... Table 3.5.4: 2° Weighted sum of Various Percentage for Structural Components Table 3.5.5: 3 Weighted sum of Various Percentage for Structural Components Table 4.2.1: Size of Catchment Areas xi 39 39 40 40 42 42 44 45 45 46 GB 47 48 49 49 50 51 54Table 4.2.4.1: Land Use of Project Basin Table 4.2.4.2: Soil Classification of the Project Basin Table 4.2.4.3: Design Hyetographs Table 4.2.4.4: Discharge Results Table 4.2.4.5: Manning's Roughness Coefficient ‘NV... Table 4.2.4.6: Freeboard Criteria for Discharge Table 4.2.4.7: Recommended Freeboard for San Juan River Table 4.4.1: Table 4.4.2: Earth Pressure Coefficient .. Table 4.4.3: Seismic Parameters Table 4.5.1: Assumptions of Primary Section Table 4.10.1: Superimposed Dead Loads for Flood Gate Superimposed Dead Loads for Retaining Wall Table 4.10.2: Sheet Steel Pile Size Table 4,10,3: Shear Wall Size Table 4.15.1: Sensitivity Analysis Economic Vs, Constructabilty Table 4.15.2: Sensitivity Analysis Economic Vs, Sustainability. Table 4.15.3: Sensitivity Analysis Economic Vs. Uncertainty... Table 4.15.4: Sensitivity Analysis Economic Vs. Risk... Table 4.15.5: Sensitivity Analysis Economic Vs, Safety Table 5.1: Bar Bending Diagram ..... Table 5.1.1: Earth Pressure Coefficient Table 6.2.1: Scour Depth Calculation Table 5.2.2: Flood Depth at Cross-Section Per Retumn Period xiv 55 56 62 63 65 wT 70 eon aT 15 7 85 89 89 94 95 96 oT 98 106 110 114 112