Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kate MacDonald
Professor Beard
03 December 2023
Having to line up at a local food drive in order to get food for the week, was a practice
my family had to take part in when I was growing up. Experiencing this struggle myself, allowed
for my eyes to widen at a young age and recognize that not only was my family experiencing
food insecurity, but so was a great number of American citizens. The Food Justice movement can
be defined as a cultural, economic, and social movement that tackles issues such as workers
rights, land ownership, indigenous rights, etc., in relation to the accessibility and production of
food. However, a key issue that has plagued many American citizens, including myself and my
family, is the topic of food insecurity and the harsh reality that it brings to people across the
nation. Times such as the Great Depression and the financial crisis of 2008 brought great stress
to Americans, however, indigenous groups have been facing food insecurity far longer than most
majority groups as they have experienced historical pressures that pigeonholed them into the
disruption of cultural practices. In response, there has been a rise in indigenous food sovereignty,
which is defined as the push for individual food sustainability within indigenous groups. Native
cultures have been left to fight food insecurity as a result of historical displacement that has
plagued cultural traditions, long-term health, and economic stability, thus leading indigenous
groups to push for food sovereignty as colonial imposition is forcing a vast population of
indigenous people to face hunger and poverty in the United States today.
MacDonald 2
Western colonization has impacted indigenous food systems, and has forced indigenous
groups to compromise cultural practices. Prior to the introduction and negative impact of
European colonizers, Indigenous Andeans developed their practices around their “kinship with
nature,” meaning that they respected their land and developed their culture in regards to that
respect (Malli). This directly impacted the way that they were able to produce and access food.
Traditionally, “subsistence activities, such as hunting, fishing, and gathering, have upheld
traditional Indigenous food systems for thousands of years, ensuring the components of a
nutritionally adequate and sustainable diet” (Malli). A typical diet would consist of protein from
hunted game and fish, but more importantly of crops that were cultivated and harvested from
specific areas of land that were inhabited by indigenous groups. Popular crops that helped
maintain a successful diet included yams, squash, beans, pumpkins, strawberries, as well as
many other crops that were known to first be successfully harvested by Indigenous Andeans.
However, this was forced to change when colonizers forcefully displaced native peoples to
infertile and unsustainable land for harvesting, causing “disengagement with subsistence
activities, including hunting, because of colonial policies has resulted in increasingly sedentary
lifestyles and an inevitable push towards consumption of market foods with higher levels of
sugar, salt, and additives” (Malli). This complete alteration of lifestyle and diet affected their
culture directly, specifically seen through the shove into the capitalist marketplace rather than the
natural collection of food. In the book, Braiding Sweetgrass, author Robin Kimmerer discusses
an example of this shift when they state “I experienced the world in that time as a gift economy,
‘goods and services’ not purchased but received as gifts from the earth ” (Kimmerer). This idea
of a gift economy is explored further within the text when the author states that “they had given
MacDonald 3
us a gift, an ongoing relationship opened between us,” the the subject being the strawberries and
the gift was fruitful sustenance in return for the harvesting of the plant (Kimmerer). Directory
showing a parallel the author then tells the reader that “farmers around us grew a lot of
strawberries and frequently hired kids to pick for them,” thus showing the introduction of the
capitalist market, cultivating goods for a direct profit rather than the natural benefit of the
harvest, of which was decaying the indigenous practice of receiving from the earth and giving
back to it without the intention of commerce (Kimmerer). The historical context of forcing
indigenous groups into infertile land directly relates to food insecurity and the deterioration of
cultural practices, as native peoples were forced to live somewhere that prevented the practice of
hunting and harvesting, and pigeonholed groups to partake in a Western market, which was not
typical to the indigenous lifestyle. Because of this forced change, getting access to food became
extremely difficult and their diets that previously contained natural nutrients, now possessed
processed foods and sugars that were for sale, not for trade, forcing indigenous groups into the
Western labor force, forcefully abandoning their way of life. With the imposition of
industrialization brought over by colonizers, indigenous groups have pushed to claim food
sovereignty which means that groups have now begun the push to control the way that they
receive and distribute food in relation to and respect of their cultural traditions.
Food insecurity has also affected the long term health of indigenous groups greatly. With
the exponential exclusion of cultural practices, focusing on hunting and farming, indigenous
groups have been exiled to face capitalist food markets as a result of historical displacement. In
the year 1830, former President Andrew Jackson approved the Indian Removal Act, of which
displaced indigenous groups to infertile lands, causing a cataclysmic shift in the daily lifestyle of
MacDonald 4
indigenous peoples in the United States, transitioning their traditional diet down an unhealthy
path of processed foods. According to BMC Public Health, “Food security, and food sovereignty
are significant determinants of Indigenous health and wellbeing,” and recent studies have shown
that the lack of security has led to a great downfall within indigenous health. For example, a
study known as the THRIVE study, analyzed the amount of healthy benefactors found in food
distributed to convenience stores frequented by native peoples. It showed that “the frequency of
food shopping at six locations: grocery store, Wal-Mart, tribal convenience stores, small markets,
Dollar Stores, and farmers' markets,” which leads to a direct correlation between cheaper food,
ScienceDirect). It is proven in the United States that it is “the only country in the world where
malnourished kids are obese why because they're consuming unhealthy food” (Using
American-Owned Convenience Stores: The THRIVE Study - ScienceDirect). Foods that are
mass distributed, especially to smaller markets and convenience stores, typically lack proper
nutrients that sustain a healthy diet, and this can be directly correlated to the rise of health
conditions, specifically type 2 diabetes and obesity within indigenous groups today. “In fact, 48.1
percent of AI/AN adults are obese, and in some Tribal communities, childhood obesity rates
exceed 50 percent,” according to the Department of Health and Human Services. (Department of
Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health, “Obesity and American Indians/Alaska
Natives.” See also Hipp and Pipestem.) In addition to poor access to healthy food from local
stores, tribes also have had historically poor access to food given to them from the government,
MacDonald 5
shown in the Suak and Fox treaty which states the “the federal government emphasized ‘articles
of subsistence,’ not foods with cultural relevance and nutritional value. Rations consisted of
foods such as lard and wheat flour that were foreign to the diets of Tribal communities and
sometimes arrived ‘rancid and rotten’” (Maillacheruvu). The problem has been recognized and
the indigenous food sovereignty movement, defined as “a specific policy approach to addressing
the underlying issues impacting Indigenous peoples and our ability to respond to our own needs
for healthy, culturally adapted Indigenous foods,” has progressed to a great extent (“Indigenous
Food Sovereignty | Indigenous Food Systems Network”). This is important to recognize, as the
movement serves as a reclamation of culture shown through their diet in order to parallel the way
Thomas Mantz, president of Feed Tampa Bay, stated that ““Everyone knows someone
that struggles having food on their table. Every single one of us” (Talks). However, the majority
of the United States population are blind to the hardships of those living on tribal lands, and why
they struggle to have food on their table. One of the reasons is economic hardship, as the price of
food in tribal reservations is exponentially higher than the rest of the United States. A data
collection performed by the Center on Budget Policy and Priorities showed that reservation
prices were much higher than national prices, exemplified by an 85% increase rate on bread,
71% on chicken, 45% on eggs, 41% on apples, and so forth (Maillacheruvu) . The increase in
food prices stem from the cost of transportation to provide food to reservation territories, which
therefore reinforces the harsh conditions that colonial imposition and native displacement had
placed upon indigenous groups. In addition to far transportation for suppliers, indigenous people
also have to travel a great distance in order to reach markets to pay for their food, which is
MacDonald 6
already at a higher price, creating an even more difficult accessibility to food, as many tribes
have limited access, if any, to vehicles. Poor access to vehicles also creates poor access to jobs,
which then results in a budget insufficient for buying groceries that are at a higher index rate.
The lack of equal access to foods that hold nutrition at a lower cost has created further economic
instability as a result of food insecurity across the native population of the United States.
There has been an overall lack of support for food sovereignty by the federal government,
which is why the food justice movement is so important to bring attention to. Although many are
affected by the issue of food insecurity, it is important to recognize the systemic problems that
have caused minority groups, specifically indigenous peoples, to have federally induced limited
accessibility, and it is even more crucial to highlight the food sovereignty movement in order to
combat the issues that these groups have been facing for decades. Further movement into the
indigenous food sovereignty movement would allow for groups to begin to practice culturally
relevant traditions that they have been forced to abandon as a result of the capitalist regime, and
reinstate their intended lifestyle as modern practice rather than forced compliance to current
Works Cited
Joseph, Leigh. “Frontiers | ‘The Old Foods Are the New Foods!’: Erosion and
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/callutheran/detail.action?docID=1212658.
Malli, A., et al. “Impacts of Colonization on Indigenous Food Systems in Canada and the
United States: A Scoping Review.” BMC Public Health, vol. 23, no. 1, Oct. 2023, pp. 1–13.
EBSCOhost
MacDonald 8
“Native Life and Food: Food Is More Than Just What We Eat | Helpful Handout Educator
Talks, TEDx. The Story of Us, Not Them - Food Insecurity | Thomas Mantz |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyA17j-XCjo.
ScienceDirect.Com | Science, Health and Medical Journals, Full Text Articles and Books.,