Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
The Municipality of Sto. Tomas was named after St. Thomas Aquinas, the high
priest of the Dominican Religious Order in 1666. The Municipality of Sto. Tomas is a
first class Municipality composed of 30 barangays. It is located in the northeastern
portion of the Province of Batangas, bounded on the north by the City of Calamba, on
the northeast by the Municipalities of Los Baños, Bay and Alaminos, on the west portion
of Tanauan City. It has a distance of 60 kilometers from Manila and 45 kilometers from
Batangas City, the provincial capital.
Sto. Tomas, a first class Municipality is within the 3rd District of Batangas and
serves as a gateway to the Province of Batangas and other southern provinces like
Mindoro, Quezon and Bicol. Likewise, it is also the entry of the Southern Tagalog
Access Road (STAR) that goes to Batangas City and the modern Batangas International
Port. Sto. Tomas comprise approximately 10 thousand hectares of land and its
population based on the certification provided by Philippine Statistics Authority with
reference No. 15SSSS-DHSD-244 ranges from 149,000 to 159,900 for the year 2015.
a. Key Officials
Municipal Mayor Edna P. Sanchez
Vice-Mayor Armenius O. Silva
Members of the Sanggunian: Florence M. Mabilangan
Catherine J. Perez
Renante V. Arcillas
Leovino M. Villegas
Gerardo M. Malijan
Cresenciano E. Ramos Jr.
Arlene F. Mañebo
Peter Thomas R. Reyes
Wilfredo M. Maliksi
i
Financial Highlights
The funds of the Municipality for Calendar Year (CY) 2017 totaling
P721,079,423.61 were sourced from local taxes, permits and licenses, service and
business income and internal revenue allotment. To carry out the projects, programs and
activities of the Municipality, the appropriations and allotment for CY 2017 totaled
P1,077,266,739.50, while the obligations at the end of the year amounted to
P627,514,086.21, leaving a balance of P449,752,653.29. The total assets, liabilities,
equity, income and expenses for CY 2017 are as follows:
Increase
CY 2017 CY 2016 (Decrease)
Assets 2,149,737,047.65 P1,589,125,512.81 P560,611,534.84
Liabilities 566,530,274.01 294,331,369.61 154,244,904.40
Equity 1,583,206,773.64 1,294,794,143.20 288,412,630.44
Revenue 721,194,923.61 594,698,328.99 126,496,594.62
Expenses 464,999,561.35 406,337,306.27 90,132,985.08
Scope of Audit
Financial, compliance and value for money audits were conducted on the accounts
and operations of the Municipality for CY 2017. The audit was conducted to ascertain
the fairness of the presentation of the financial statements and compliance of the
Municipality with laws, rules and regulations as well as the economical, efficient and
effective utilization of resources.
ii
3. The accuracy of Inventory Accounts totaling to P26,013,194.14 under the
General Fund (GF) were overstated by P13,520,755.62 and understated the
Government equity/expense account by P12,191,605.62 due to the inability of
the Officer-In-Charge, General Service Office/Municipal Treasurer to prepare
and submit the Summary of Supplies and Materials Issued (SSMI) together
with the Requisition Issue Slip to the Municipal Accountant for recording
issuances in the books of the agency. Likewise, the inventory account included
musical equipment totaling P1,329,150.00, thus understated the Property, Plant
and Equipment, Accumulated Depreciation and Government Equity/expense
accounts.
4. The account balance of Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) amounting to
P1,111,319,784.76 remained doubtful of validity and accuracy, contrary to
Section 156 of the Manual on the New Government Accounting System
(NGAS) for LGUs and Manual on Property Custodianship, due to repeated
failure to create Inventory Committee who will conduct physical inventory,
prepare the Report on Physical Count on Property, Plant and Equipment
(RPCPPE) and reconcile the variance amounting to P547,321,983.63 with the
Accounting and Property Records. Further, the development cost of the
operating system taken up in CY 2015 totaling P3,461,110.80 remained in the
Construction in Progress (CIP) – Infrastructure Assets account as of December
31, 2017, overstated the PPE account and understated the Intangible Asset -
Computer Software account both by the same amount.
iii
2. the Municipal Mayor oblige the Municipal Accountant:
iv
4. the Municipal Mayor:
o reconcile the results of the count with the property and accounting
records; and
• the Municipal Treasurer to notify the creditors about their claims and
require them the presentation of documents to support their claim within a
grace period of five (5) calendar days. If no claim has been made until the
grace period, require the Accountant to revert the payables for a fair
presentation of the account.
v
We recommended that the Municipal Mayor:
• direct the Sanggunian Bayan to pass a resolution creating a task force who
will handle the eviction of the informal family settlers/inhabitants near the
railroad to the relocation site considering that the target dates for the
relocation was March 2015 and the housing units were completed almost
two years ago;
• define the duties and functions of the task force to fast tract clearing of the
railroad area including the dissemination on the availability of affordable
housing loan project to facilitate occupancy of the housing units;
We recommended that the Municipal Mayor direct the GAD Focal Point
Person to properly monitor and report regularly the status of implementation
of the activities stated in the Gender and Development Plan in order to address
the gender issues. Ensure that the programs and projects included in the GAD
Plan are gender responsive processes, procedures are properly followed and
other factors that would affect the implementation is considered to avoid
problems when it comes to implementation. Likewise, utilize the fund solely
for GAD related activities or to specific programs that are gender-responsive
and are aligned to the GAD mandate.
vi
We recommended that the Municipal Mayor create Inspectorate Team
composed of representative from the offices of the Accounting, Treasury,
Budget and General Services in order to strengthen internal control to reduce
the possible risk of manipulation in the procurement of goods.
Further instruct the General Service Officer to direct personnel concerned not
to affix their signature on the lower portion of the canvass sheet which is
specifically for the signature of supplier only.
The concerned officers to look into the root cause of the delay in the
preparation and submission of the financial reports and effect appropriate
action/s when necessary, to make possible the early submission of the same.
5. The Municipal Government was not able to submit within the reglementary
period the Agency Action Plan and Status of Implementation (AAPSI) of
prior year’s audit recommendations contained in the CY 2016 Annual Audit
Report contrary to Section 88 of the General Appropriations Act of 2017
dated December 22, 2016, thus, incurred delay in the monitoring and
validation by the Auditor of their respective implementation as well as in the
submission of Annual Audit Report.
6. The Municipality failed to provide the Audit Team Leader with a list of all
government Program/Projects/Activities (PPAs) that are to be implemented
during the year, contrary to COA Circular No. 2013-004 dated January 30,
vii
2013, thus, transparency on the implementation of government projects was
not achieved and validation by the Audit Team was not undertaken.
• the Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) Chairman thru the BAC
Secretariat and concerned personnel of the General Service Office (GSO),
to submit copies of perfected contracts/purchase orders together with the
required supporting documents and Notice of Delivery, respectively, to the
Office of the Auditor in accordance with the provisions of COA Circular
Nos. 2009-001 and 95-006 for proper evaluation and technical review of
the contracts as well as timely inspection of deliveries; and
viii
The foregoing, together with the observation and recommendation in Part II, of
this report were discussed in an exit conference conducted with the concerned Municipal
officials and employees on July 11, 2018. Management’s view and comments were
considered in the Report, where appropriate.
Of the 23 prior year’s audit recommendations embodied in the 2016 Annual Audit
Report, seven were fully implemented, eight were partially implemented and eight were
not implemented by the Municipality.
ix