Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://manualpost.com/download/toyota-lexus-epc-02-2019-spare-parts-catalogue
/
TOYOTA & LEXUS EPC [02.2019] Spare Parts Catalogue Winrar Size: 6.9GB Full
extract package Size: 23,5GB Type: TOYOTA & LEXUS PARTS CATALOG
Region: All region (Europe, General, Japan, Overseas, USA) Language : EN Year
/ Release Date : 2019/02 Version : 02.2019 Win: Windows 7 Year: 02.2019
Version : 02-2019 Developer : Toyota motor corporation Medicine : Not required
Description : The original directory on the selection of spare parts Toyota & Lexus.
Lexus is already active (just in case 16030117). Electronic parts catalogue for
Toyota vehicles - full. Toyota / Lexus EPC3 02-2019 covers all Toyota models for
all markets. Toyota / Lexus EPC 02-2019 includes: Toyota / Lexus Parts Catalog
02-2019 for Europe Toyota / Lexus Parts Catalog 02-2019 for General Toyota /
Lexus Parts Catalog 02-2019 for USA Toyota / Lexus Parts Catalog 03-2018 for
Japan
Download all on: manualpost.com.
But the secret, and, perhaps, the yet obscure influence of the
press, must often have been apparent to Henry the Eighth, when the
king sat in council. There he marked the alarms of Wolsey, and the
terrified remonstrances of the entire body of “the Papelins;” and
when the day came that their ejectors filled their seats, the king
discovered, that though the objects were changed, the same dread
of the press continued. The war against books commenced; an
expurgatory index, or a catalogue of prohibited books, chiefly
English, was sent forth before Henry had broken with the papal
power; subsequently, the fresher proclamation declared the books of
the Papelins to be “seditious,” as the use of “the new learning” had
been anathematized as “heretical.”
Henry the Eighth left the age he had himself created, with its
awakened spirit. The three succeeding reigns, acting in direct
opposition to each other, disturbed the minds of the people;
controversies raged, and books multiplied. The sphere of publication
widened, in this vertiginous era, printers greatly increased in the
reign of Edward the Sixth. But the craft did not flourish, when the
craftsmen had become numerous. We have the contemporary
authority of one of the most eminent printers, that the practice of
the art, and the cost of the materials, had become so exceedingly
chargeable, that the printers were driven by necessity to throw
themselves into the hands of “the Stationers,” or booksellers, for
“small gains.”5 It is probable that at this period, the printers
perceived that vending their books at the printing-office was not a
mode which made them sufficiently public. This is the first indication
that the printing, and the publication or the sale of books, were
becoming separate trades.
The rage of government in this war against books was still sharper
at a later period, provoked by the spread of the Mar-prelate
pamphlets. A decree of the Star-chamber in 1586, among other
orders, allows no printer to have an additional press without license;
awards that there shall be no printing in any obscure part of a
house; nor any printer out of the city of London, excepting at the
two Universities; and till “the excessive multitude of printers be
abated, diminished, or by death given over,” no one shall resume
that trade; and that the wardens of the Stationers’ Company, with
assistants, shall enter at all times warehouses, shops, &c., to seize
all “letter-presses, and other printing instruments, to be defaced,
melted, sawed in pieces, broken or battered at the smith’s forge.”10
Amid all this book-phobia, a curious circumstance occurred. The
learned could not prosecute their studies for the prohibition against
many excellent works, written by those who were “addicted to the
errors of Popery in foreign parts,” and which also contained “matters
against the state of this land.” In this dilemma, a singular expedient
was adopted. The archbishop allowed “Ascanius de Renialme, a
merchant bookseller, to bring into this realm some few copies of
every such sort of books, upon this condition only, that they be first
brought to me, and so delivered only to such persons whom we
deem most meet men to have the reading of them.” At this time it
must have been an affair of considerable delicacy and difficulty to
obtain a quotation, without first hastening to Lambeth Palace, there
to be questioned!
If the freedom of the press had been wholly wrested from the
printers, it was not the sole grievance in the present state of our
literature, for another custom had been assumed which hung on the
royal prerogative—that of granting letters patent, or privileged
licenses, under the broad seal to individuals, to deal in a specific
class of books, to the exclusion of every other publisher. Possibly the
same secret motive which had contrived the absolute control of the
press, suggested the grants of these privileges. One enjoyed the
privilege of printing Bibles; another all law-books; another
grammars; another “almanacks and prognostications;” and another,
ballads and books in prose and metre. These privileges assuredly
increased the patronage of the great, and the dispensations of these
favours were doubtless often abused. A singing man had the license
for printing music-books, which he extended to that of being the
sole vendor of all ruled paper, on the plea that where there were
ruled lines, musical notes might be pricked down; and a private
gentleman, who was neither printer nor stationer, had the privilege
of printing grammars and other things, which he farmed out for a
considerable annual revenue, by which means these books were
necessarily enhanced in price.
In this war against books, the severe decree of the Star Chamber,
1586, was renewed with stricter prohibitions, and more penal
severity by a decree of the Star Chamber, under Charles the First, in
1637. Printing and printers were now placed under the supervision of
the great officers of state; law-books were to be judiciously
approved by the lord chief-justice; historical works were to be
submitted to the secretaries of state; heraldry was left to the lord
marshal; divinity, physic, philosophy, and poetry, were to be
sanctioned by the Archbishop of Canterbury or the Bishop of
London. Two copies of every work were to be preserved in custody,
to prevent any alterations being made in the published volumes,
which would be detected on their comparison. Admirable
preparatory and preventive measures! Here would ensue a general
purgation of every atom in the human system, occasioning
obstructions to the doctrines and discipline of the Church of England,
and the state of government. The aim of all these decrees and
proclamations was to abridge the number of printers, and to
invigorate the absolute power conferred on the Stationers’ Company,
who had long delivered themselves, bound hand and foot, to the
government, for the servile possession of their privileges. Printers
were still limited to twenty, as in the reign of Elizabeth, and only four
letter-founders allowed. Every printed book on paper was to bear
the impress of the printer’s name, on pain of corporal punishment.
They held books in such terror, that even those which had formerly
been licensed, were not allowed to be reprinted, without being
“reviewed,” as they express it, and re-watched by placing on guard
this double sentinel. There are some extraordinary clauses which
betray the feeble infancy of the rude policy of that day. The decree
tells us that “printing in corners without license had been usually
done by journeymen out of work,” and to provide against this source
of inquietude, it compels the printers to employ all journeymen out
of employ, “though the printer should be able to do his own work
without these journeymen;” and in the same spirit of compulsion, it
ordains that all such unemployed shall be obliged to work whenever
called on.15 Masters and men were equally amenable to fines
impossible to be paid, and penal pains almost too horrible to endure,
short of life, but not of ruin: a dark, a merciless, a mocking tribunal
where the judges sate the prosecutors, and whose unwritten laws
hung on their own lips; and where to discharge any accused person
as innocent was looked on as a reproach of their negligence, or an
imputation of their sagacity.
The secret design of all these entangling edicts was to hold the
printers in passive obedience to the government, whatever that
government might be; for each separate government, though acting
on opposite principles, manifested a remarkable uniformity in their
proceedings with the press. In the arbitrary days of Charles the
Second, an extraordinary, if not an audacious, attempt was made to
wrest the art of printing out of the hands of its professors, and to
place the press wholly at the disposal of the sovereign. This usurping
doctrine was founded on a startling plea. As our monarchs had
granted privileges to the earliest printers, and, from the introduction
of the art into England, had never ceased their patronage or their
control, it was inferred, that our kings had never yielded the royal
prerogative of printing any more than they had that of coining. The
“mystery” of printing, in the style of the lawyers, was “a flower of
the crown!”—the exercise of the prerogative; and therefore every
printer in England must be a sworn servant of the crown. At such a
period we are not surprised to find an express treatise put forth to
demonstrate to his sacred majesty, that “printing belonged to him, in
his public and private capacity, as supreme magistrate and as
proprietor;” in reality there was to be but one printer for all England,
and that printer the king! This was giving at once the most elevated
and the most degraded notions of “the divine art,” which this servile
assumer describes can “not only bereave the king of his good name,
but of the very hearts of his people.”16
The future licenser of the press, who was throwing his net to haul
in all these fish at a cast, took advantage of this project, which at
once was levelled at the freedom of the trade, and the freedom of
the press. Printers solely working on their own copies, would indeed
check “the ungovernable ambition of the booksellers,” by diminishing
their copyrights; while those “unhappy printers” would be relieved,
who at present have no other work than what “the great dealers in
treasonous or seditious books” furnished them. All these were but
the ostensible motives, for the real object designed was that the
printers should become the creatures of the patronage of
government, and, by the diminution of their number, the contracted
circle would be the more easily managed.
1 See a curious note of Hearne’s in his Glossary to “Peter Langtoft’s Chronicle,” p. 685.
Also Herbert’s “Typog. Antiq.” p. 1435.
3 A curious and a copious catalogue of these books, “though the books themselves are
almost perished,” may be seen in Strype’s “Ecclesiastical Memorials,” i. 165.
4 The book, “De Verâ Differentiâ inter Regiam Potestatem et Ecclesiasticam,” was called
“The King’s Book.” It seems that the scholastic monarch gave some finishing strokes to
what had probably passed through the hands of his most expert casuists.
9 In the Lansdowne Manuscripts, 43, fol. 76, will be found “an act to restrain the
licentious printing of unprofitable and hurtful books,” 1580. After declaring that the art of
printing is “a most happy and profitable invention,” it is pointed at those “who pen or
translate in the English tongue poesies, ditties, and songs, serving for a great part of them
to none other end, what titles soever they bear, but to set up an art of making lascivious
and ungodly love, to the intolerable corruption of life and manners—and to the no small or
sufferable waste of the treasure of this realm, which is thereby consumed in paper, a forren
and chargeable commoditie.” The first paper made in England was at Dartford, in 1588, by
a German, who was knighted by the queen.
11 The privilege of a royal grant to the author was the only protection the author had for
any profits of his work. Henry the Eighth granted Palsgrave his exclusive right for the
printing of his book for seven years. Bishop Cooper obtained a privilege for the sale of his
“Thesaurus” for twelve years; and a translator of Tacitus, for his version, during his natural
life.
We have a list “of books yielded by the richer printers who had licenses from the queen;”
but whether they were only copies bestowed in charity for the poorer “stationers,” or given
up by the monopolists, I do not understand.—Herbert’s “Typographical Antiq.” p. 1672.
16 “The Original and Growth of Printing, collected out of History and the Records of this
Kingdom,” &c., by Richard Atkyns, Esq., 1664. In this rare tract first appeared a narrative of
the introduction of printing into Oxford, before Caxton, by the printer Francis Corsellis, to
prove that printing was brought into England by Henry the Sixth.
17 For “unlicensed books” the printer charged twenty-five per cent. extra, but the
booksellers sold them for double and treble the cost of other books.
“Considerations and Proposals in order to the Regulation of the Press, together with
diverse instances of Treasonous and Seditious Pamphlets, proving the necessity thereof,”
1663.
INDEX.
Aborigines, British, 1—5.