This document is an order from a court in Criminal M.A. No. 110/2017. [1] The order denies an application (Exh. 19) for interim protection from arrest, as the prosecution submitted that the applicant had already been arrested by the investigating officer just after their bail application was dismissed. [2] Today in court, the applicant's advocate confirmed that the applicant was arrested and produced before the lower court for remand, making the application for interim protection (Exh. 19) no longer applicable. Therefore, the court rejected application Exh. 19 as being infructuous and not tenable.
This document is an order from a court in Criminal M.A. No. 110/2017. [1] The order denies an application (Exh. 19) for interim protection from arrest, as the prosecution submitted that the applicant had already been arrested by the investigating officer just after their bail application was dismissed. [2] Today in court, the applicant's advocate confirmed that the applicant was arrested and produced before the lower court for remand, making the application for interim protection (Exh. 19) no longer applicable. Therefore, the court rejected application Exh. 19 as being infructuous and not tenable.
This document is an order from a court in Criminal M.A. No. 110/2017. [1] The order denies an application (Exh. 19) for interim protection from arrest, as the prosecution submitted that the applicant had already been arrested by the investigating officer just after their bail application was dismissed. [2] Today in court, the applicant's advocate confirmed that the applicant was arrested and produced before the lower court for remand, making the application for interim protection (Exh. 19) no longer applicable. Therefore, the court rejected application Exh. 19 as being infructuous and not tenable.
Exh.20 on 2/1/2017. Heard Ld.APP Shri.Keskar and the I.O. who have submitted Say Exh.21 to application Exh.19 for giving interim protection for 15 days from arrest of the applicant to enable him to file bail application before the Hon'ble High Court and to bring interim relief but as per submission of prosecution just after dismissal of bail application i.e. Criminal M.A.No.110/2017 that the I.O. had arrested the applicant and therefore the present application Exh.19 is not tenable. The Say Exh.20 and 21 filed in writing clearly show that the applicant was arrested by the I.O. In the circumstances Exh.19 is not tenable.
2. Today Ld.Advocate Shri.Deshmukh for applicant has
appeared and submitted that the applicant was arrested and today produced before the Ld.Subordinate Court for remand which has fortified that the applicant is in the custody of police. In the circumstances the application Exh.19 has become infructuous and not tenable and therefore could not be allowed and stands rejected.
(A.N.Choure) Additional Sessions Judge, Date : 03/01/2018. Ahmednagar.