Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Background
The prestige of any journal is considered by how many abstracting and indexing services cover
that journal. It has been observed in the last few years that authors have started searching for
indexed journals to publish their articles. Probably this is happening because it has become a
mandatory requirement for further promotions of teaching faculty (Dhammi and Ul Haq 2016),
having to Indexed journals, they are usually considered to be of higher scientific quality as
compared to non-indexed journals. This, however, has become a trend, keeping aside the essence
of being indexed. Beginning in the mid 20th century, indexing sought to claim its popularity,
over the years the concept of citation indexing grew to a larger context among different writers
and authors. The study will seek to underline the concept of citation indexing in explaining the
process that is required for research scholars to attain an idea of how it has evolved to be a
source of importance in research publication.
Introduction
Because of the ongoing development of an increase in scientific research and literature, there has
been an intensive growth in the service of citation indexing. Citation is generally understood as
the process of acknowledging or citing the author, year, title, and locus of publication (journal,
book, or other) of a source used in a published work. Citation index breaks down the connection
between different parts of references, for example, its source of publication, editors, reviewers,
and authors. Citations are the formal, explicit linkages between papers that have particular points
in common. A citation index is built around these linkages. It lists publications that have been
cited and identifies the sources of the citations. Anyone conducting a literature search can find
from one to dozens of additional papers on a subject just by knowing one that has been cited.
History
The history of citation indexing can be traced back from the times of the Hebrew writings, but it
is not prominently studied until the 20th century. The concept of citation indexing evolved with
such a significant number of different turns in the history of research and sciences while
perceiving that the estimation of data is controlled by the individuals who use it, the approach to
quantify the nature of the work by estimating the effect it makes subsequently
Walimbe & Gurpur (2017) states that Citation indexing began in the 1950s, and has long been
dominated by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI, which was acquired by and is now
renamed Thomson Reuters). Garfield proposed an index of Impact Factor (IF), which was then
chosen by the Science Citation Index (SCI) in 1960 as a means to specify the influence and by
extension, the value of the indexed journals (Andrew 2003). In 1960, Eugene Garfield's Institute
for Scientific Information (ISI) introduced the first citation index for papers published in
academic journals, first the Science Citation Index (SCI), and later the Social Sciences Citation
Indexing services
It cannot be ascertained which indexation is more accurate and prevalent, and the process to how
indexing is being indexed in different services is a concern, it is notable that indexing has
become prominent, in the context of India, for research scholars under UGC norms, scholars are
mandatorily asked to published an article which has Scopus index, this shows that Scopus is
given more preference over other, the reason how/why couldn’t be brought into the study,
similarly different institutions follow different indexing based on their preferences. The Institute
for Scientific Information (ISI) produces multidisciplinary citation indexes. One is the Science
The reason citation indexes provide multidisciplinary searching capabilities is, once again,
related to the fact that most indexers are not as qualified as the author himself to decide which
Analysis
Citation indexing plays a vital role in the scholarly journey, it has the capability of being
mechanized to an enormous degree. Citation indexing enacts the idea of semantic differences. It
mechanizes the gap that has hindrances in languages. Citation indexing solves the depth versus
cost problem by substituting the authors’ citations for the indexer’s judgments. This approach
has the advantage of eliminating the need for intellectual indexing. An important strength of
indexing is search effectiveness, its quality has two components. One is search productivity,
which is concerned with finding the largest possible number of relevant papers. The other is
search efficiency, which is concerned with minimizing the number of irrelevant papers the
searcher must check out to identify the relevant ones. Garfield(1967) “ The traditional
philosophy of indexing system design implies that individual documents can be treated as though
they were independent entities. This basic fallacy not only results in the loss of important
informational links, but it is basically inefficient.” the author also states that “Citations display
all the properties of word indexing terms because citations are, in fact, alternative and usually
unambiguous symbols for concepts traditionally codified by headings”.
Increased awareness of the usefulness of citation indexing as a tool for retrieval and evaluation
will make this aspect of refereeing more important, and what now passes for minor carelessness
or discourtesy could easily come to be regarded as serious malpractice. (Margolis 1967). The
citation is a precise, unambiguous representation of a subject that requires no interpretation and
Representation
Garfield (1979) emphasized on the factor that an author’s citation behavior might be influenced
to varying degrees by the visibility, prestige, and accessibility of the cited journal; Likewise,
Cronin (1984) suggested that social and psychological factors as well as other external factors,
such as the target audience or the character and status of a cited journal, affect the citing process.
ISI claims that the resultant citation counts are a measure of quality. However, not all disciplines
are equally represented, and the extent to which journals are selected for inclusion in the citation
indexes is dependent on a series of complex factors and policies (Testa, 1998). There is a
complexity that drives when the number of citation among gender is concerned, there are
Conclusion
While referring to other papers an author automatically becomes a contributor not only to the
size of the system but also to its integration. Garfiend(1979)While referring to other papers an
author automatically becomes a contributor not only to the size of the system but also to its
integration. A citation count is based not only on the number of authors who cite another author's
work, but both the original work and the citer's work must be located in the body of literature
indexed by ISI, and to be included in the databases, both journals were subjected to peer review.
Garfield(1967) One of the most frequently expressed criticisms of the citation index is that it is
not a "subject" index. What is really meant, however, is that the citation index is not a "word"
index. Therefore, the question, "What is a subject?" is fundamental not only in evaluating
citation indexing but all types of systems for subject analysis. Garfield also indicates that
“scientific merit is not always the sole reason an author will cite a paper published in a particular
journal ”.
It can be a proof factor to note that Garfield's accomplishment in synthesizing the concept of
citation indexing lay forth in building up the utility and objectivity of a citation index and in
pulling up related papers in distributed writing that from the start probably won't have appeared
to be relevant to the specialist's request. Today, it is viewed as one of the most dependable assets
Reference
Adams, C. (1978). Academic TOL Column: A NEW BIBLIOGRAPHIC TOOL FOR THE ARTS AND
HUMANITIES FIELDS: The University of Chicago Press, URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27946018
Andrew, P. & Kurmis, P, A. (2003). Understanding the Limitations of the Journal Impact Factor, The
Journal Of Bone & Joint Surgery. Volume 85-A · number 12.
Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process: the role and significance of citations in scientific communication.
London: Taylor Graham.
Cronin,B. & Snyder,H,W. (1997) Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal
literature: a study of sociology. Journal documentation, 53(3):263-273.
Dhammi,I,K,. & Ul Haq,R. (2016). What is indexing, Indian Journal of Orthopaedics; 50(2): 115–116.
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.177579
Ferber, M, A. (1988). Citations and networking. Gender and Society; Sage Publications, Inc. pp. 82-89
Garfield, E. (1967). Primordial Concepts, Citation Indexing, and Historio-Bibliography: The Journal of
LibraryHistory,(pp.235-249).
Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing - its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities.
New York: Wiley.
Gurpur, S. (2017). Citation Indices: A Conceptual Review Vidula Walimbel. International Research
Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) Volume: 04 Issue: 04 | Apr -2017 www.irjet.net
Margolis, J. (1967). Citation Indexing and Evaluation of Scientific Papers, Science 1Vol. 155, Issue 3767,
pp. 1213-1219 DOI: 10.1126/science.155.3767.1213
Quint, B. (2006). Elsevier’s Scopus Introduces Citation Tracker: Challenge to Thomson. ISI’s Web of
Science.
Sansison & Alexander (1989). Documentation note: Thinking about citation analysis, J ournal of
Documentation. Volume 45, Number 1, pp. 59-64(6).
Shiffrin, R, M,. & Borner, K. (2004). Mapping knowledge domains, Proceeding of the National. Academy
of Science of the United States of America 101, 5183- 5185
Tescione, M. (1998). A Woman's Name: Implications for Publication, Citation, and Tenure: Educational
ol. 27, No. 8. pp. 38-42.
Researcher, American Educational Research Association, V
Weinstock, M. (1971). Citation Indexes, Encyclopedia of Library and Information sciences, Volume 5,
Pas 16-40, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York