Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aqliy Hujum Va Keys Study Metodlari Yordamida Funksiya Hosilasi Mavzusini o Qitish
Aqliy Hujum Va Keys Study Metodlari Yordamida Funksiya Hosilasi Mavzusini o Qitish
ISSN: 2181-1601
ANNOTATSIYA
Ushbu maqolada muammoli ta’lim texnologiyalaridan “Aqliy xujum” va “Keys
stadi” metodlari yordamida mulohazalar algebrasi asosiy teng kuchli formulalari
mavzusini o‘qitishda qo‘llash namunalari keltirilgan. Avvalo, shu ikki metod bo‘yicha
umumiy ma’lumotlar, yutuq va kamchiliklari o‘rganilgan. Berilgan topshiriqlar
yechimlari bilan birga tahlil qilinib, dars maqsadiga erishish yo‘llari o‘rganilgan.
Jarayoni o‘rganishda Ta’lim oluvchilarning aktiv qatnashganliklari tufayli mavzu
xotiralarida uzoq saqlanib, faol bilim zahirasini tashkil etishi xaqida aytib o‘tilgan.
Kalit so‘zlar: “Keys stadi” metodi, “Aqliy hujum” metodi, muammoli ta’lim,
teng kuchli formulalar, ta’lim, ta’lim oluvchilar.
ABSTRACT
This article presents examples of the use of problem-oriented learning
technologies when teaching basic, equally powerful formulas of algebra of reasoning
using methods of brainstorming and studying specific situations. First of all, the general
information, advantages and disadvantages of these two methods are studied.
Assignments are analyzed along with solutions, and ways to achieve lesson goals are
explored. It was noted that due to the active participation of students in the study of the
process, the topic remains in memory for a long time and forms an active reserve of
knowledge.
Keywords: Case study method, brainstorming method, problem learning,
equally powerful formulas, education, learners.
1- Jarayonning g
Javob: S t 2
savol kechishi tezligi 2
nima?
2- Oniy tezlik S
Javob: v lim
savol nima bilan t 0 t
xarakterlanadi?
3- Funksiyaning Javob: y f (x) funksiya (a, b) intervalda aniqlangan
savol hosilasi deb bo‘lib, x0 nuqtadagi funksiya y orttirmasining x
nimaga argument orttirmasiga nisbatining, argument orttirmasi
aytiladi?
nolga intilgandagi limitiga, y f (x) funksiyaning x0
nuqtadagi hosilasi deyiladi
4- Hosilaning Javob: y f (x) egri chiziqqa M 0 ( x0 , y 0 )
savol geometrik nuqtadan o‘tkazilgan urinma tenglamasi
ma’nosi nima? y y0 f ( x0 )( x x0 ) bo‘ladi, bunda y 0 f ( x0 ) .
Funksiya grafigiga urinish nuqtasi M 0 ( x0 , y 0 ) da
o‘tkazilgan normalning tenglamasi
1
y y0 ( x x0 ), ( f ( x0 ) 0)
f ( x0 )
bo‘ladi.
5- Ikkinchi tartibli Javob: y f (x) funksiyaning ikkinchi tartibli hosilasi
savol hosila nima? deb, uning hosilasidan olingan hosilaga, ya’ni ( y) ga
aytiladi. Ikkinchi tartibli hosila quyidagilarning biri bilan
belgilanadi: y , f ( x), d 2 y / dx 2 .
6- Differensiallas Javob: x erkli o‘zgaruvchi, u u(x) va v v(x) uning
savol h qoidalari va differensiallanuvchi funksiyalari bo‘lsin.
formulalarini 1., С 0 C o‘zgarmas miqdor.
bilasizmi? 2. x 1 .
3. (u v) u v .
4. (u v) u v uv .
5. (cu ) c u .
u u v u v
6. .
v v2
7- Qanday Javob: y f (x) funksiyaning n -tartibli hosilasi deb
savol hosilaga n - uning (n 1) tartibli hosilasidan olingan hosilaga aytiladi
tartibli hosila va quyidagilarning biri bilan
deyiladi?
belgilanadi y (n ) , f ( n ) ( x) , d n y / dx n . Ta’rifga ko‘ra
y ( n) y ( n1)
dy d 2 y dx d 2 x dy
dy dt d 2 y dt 2 dt dt 2 dt
,
dx dx dx 2 dx
3
dt
dt
formula bilan topiladi.
REFERENCES
1. Умарова У.У. (2020). Роль современных интерактивных методов в изучении
темы «Множества и операции над ними», Вестник науки и образования. 94:16,
часть 2, С. 21-24.
2. Mardanova F.Ya., Rasulov T.H. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of the method
of working in small group in teaching higher mathematics. Academy, 55:4, pp. 65-68.
3. Расулов Х.Р., Джўрақулова Ф.М. (2021). Баъзи динамик системаларнинг сонли
ечимлари ҳақида. Scientific progress, 2:1, С. 455-462.
4. Авезов А.Х. (2016). Некоторые численные результаты исследования
трехмерных турбулентных струй реагирующих газов. Молодой учёный c.1-2.
5. Avezov A.X. (2019). On The Ahhlication of the Finite Element Metod in Dynamic
and Static Problems of the Mechanics of A Deformable Body. International Journal.
WWJMRD; 5(6): 10-14.
6. Boboeva M.N., Rasulov T.H. (2020). The method of using problematic equation in
teaching theory of matrix to students. Academy, 55:4, pp. 68-71.
7. Баҳронов Б.И. (2021). Функциянинг узлуксизлиги ва текис узлуксизлиги
мавзусини ўкитишга доир баъзи методик тавсиялар. Scientific progress. 2:1, 1355-
1363 б.
8. Марданова Ф.Я. (2020). Использование научного наследия великих предков на
уроках математики. Проблемы педагогики, 51:6, С. 40-43.
9. Расулов Т.Ҳ., Расулов Х.Р. (2021). Ўзгариши чегараланган функциялар
бўлимини ўқитишга доир методик тавсиялар, Scientific progress, 2:1, 559-567 б.
10. Тошева Н.А. (2021). Использование метода мозгового штурма на уроке
комплексного анализа и его преимущества. Проблемы педагогики, 53:2, С. 31-34.